population models for ecological risk assessment of ... · population models for ecological risk...

51
Population Models for Ecological Risk Assessment of Chemicals: The Past, CREAM, and the Future CREAM Open Conference June 2013 Leipzig, DE R. Pastorok

Upload: others

Post on 27-Mar-2020

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Population Models for Ecological Risk Assessment of ... · Population Models for Ecological Risk Assessment of Chemicals: The Past, CREAM, and the Future CREAM Open Conference June

Population Models for Ecological

Risk Assessment of Chemicals: The

Past, CREAM, and the Future

CREAM Open Conference

June 2013

Leipzig, DE

R. Pastorok

DRAFT for internal use only – Do Not

Distribute

Page 2: Population Models for Ecological Risk Assessment of ... · Population Models for Ecological Risk Assessment of Chemicals: The Past, CREAM, and the Future CREAM Open Conference June

Fibonacci Sequence in Nature

Page 4: Population Models for Ecological Risk Assessment of ... · Population Models for Ecological Risk Assessment of Chemicals: The Past, CREAM, and the Future CREAM Open Conference June

Today’s Topics

• Roots of population modeling

— Especially as related to ecological risk assessment

(ERA)

• Key milestones in the development of

population modeling for ERA

• Key issues for the future of chemical risk

assessment???

Page 5: Population Models for Ecological Risk Assessment of ... · Population Models for Ecological Risk Assessment of Chemicals: The Past, CREAM, and the Future CREAM Open Conference June

Birth of Scientific Demography: Graunt 1662

Source: Hutchinson 1978 after Guildhall Museum Library in London

Bill of Mortality:

London,11-18 February 1661

Page 6: Population Models for Ecological Risk Assessment of ... · Population Models for Ecological Risk Assessment of Chemicals: The Past, CREAM, and the Future CREAM Open Conference June

Exponential Population Growth – The

Malthusian Model, 1798

dN dt

rmaxN

Page 7: Population Models for Ecological Risk Assessment of ... · Population Models for Ecological Risk Assessment of Chemicals: The Past, CREAM, and the Future CREAM Open Conference June

• “A struggle for existence inevitably follows from the

high rate at which all organic beings tend to increase”

Darwin’s Struggle for Existence:

Geometrical Ratio of Increase, 1859

• From a single pair of elephants,

“after a period of from 740 to

750 years there would be nearly

19 million elephants alive”

Page 8: Population Models for Ecological Risk Assessment of ... · Population Models for Ecological Risk Assessment of Chemicals: The Past, CREAM, and the Future CREAM Open Conference June

There are Limits to Growth, 1683 -1838 -1925

William Petty

Maximum sustainable population size,

now known as ‘carrying capacity’ K

Logistic population growth

St. Paul Island, Alaska

Al. Lotka

Page 9: Population Models for Ecological Risk Assessment of ... · Population Models for Ecological Risk Assessment of Chemicals: The Past, CREAM, and the Future CREAM Open Conference June

The Roots of Population Modeling in ERA (1)

Year 1800

Year 1900

1859 – Darwin: geometric ratio of increase after Sir William Hale 1677

1925 – Elements of Physical Biology, Lotka

1838-1847 – Logistic population growth model, Verhulst

1662 – Birth of scientific demography, Graunt: Natural and Political

Observations… upon the Bill of Mortality

1798 – Exponential population growth model, Malthus

1202 – Fibonacci sequence for rabbit population growth, Leonardo of Pisa

1683 – Maximum sustainable population size, Petty: Another Essay in Political Arithmetic

1925 – The Biology of Population Growth, Pearl

Page 10: Population Models for Ecological Risk Assessment of ... · Population Models for Ecological Risk Assessment of Chemicals: The Past, CREAM, and the Future CREAM Open Conference June

Population Fluctuations can be Oscillatory

or “Chaotic”

Saether et al. 2002

Source: Reid et al. 2012 http://www.arctic.noaa.gov/reportcard/lemmings.html

Lemmings, far North Pied Flycatcher, Netherlands

Page 11: Population Models for Ecological Risk Assessment of ... · Population Models for Ecological Risk Assessment of Chemicals: The Past, CREAM, and the Future CREAM Open Conference June

Stochasticity or Time Delays in Population

Models Produces ‘Chaotic’ Fluctuations

http://www.simulistics.com/files/examples/popdy/pop5c.gif

Early 1970s: Discrete logistic,

Robert M. May

1948: Differential logistic

equation with time delay,

G.E. Hutchinson

Page 12: Population Models for Ecological Risk Assessment of ... · Population Models for Ecological Risk Assessment of Chemicals: The Past, CREAM, and the Future CREAM Open Conference June

1963 IUCN Red List and 1966 Endangered

Species Act Sparked the Bloom of PVA

Page 13: Population Models for Ecological Risk Assessment of ... · Population Models for Ecological Risk Assessment of Chemicals: The Past, CREAM, and the Future CREAM Open Conference June

The Roots of Population Modeling in ERA (2)

1964-1974 – International Biological Program, systems perspective

Mid 1940s – Population ecology blooms

Year 1980

Year 1940

Year 1960 1960s-70s – Community ecology blooms: theory, size-selective predation, keystone spp.

1975 – Simple-delay logistic model applied to data: chaos theory, May

1950s - von Bertalanffy general system theory; Ricker Spawner-Recruit

1945 – On the use of matrices in certain population mathematics, Leslie

Cellular automata, von Neumann

1972 – JABOWA forest model, Botkin et al.

1979 – Fish cohort growth model, DeAngelis et al.

1964 – Douglas fir forest IBM, Newnham

1963, 1966 – ICUN Red List, U.S. Endangered Species Act

1970 – Use of GIS in regional planning sets the stage for spatial models

1978 – Population viability analysis (PVA) minimum population size, Shaffer

Year 1950

Year 1970

1969 – Metapopulation model, Richard Levins

1974 – Ecological Modelling, Sven Jorgensen (ed.)

1950s – Stochastic population modeling

Page 14: Population Models for Ecological Risk Assessment of ... · Population Models for Ecological Risk Assessment of Chemicals: The Past, CREAM, and the Future CREAM Open Conference June

The Modern Era (1)

1986 – User’s Manual for Ecological Risk Assessment, Barnthouse et al.

1980’s – Development of population models for pesticides+, Grant et al. +

Year 1990

Year 1980

1982 – Ecosystem modeling O’Neill et al. 1982

1980s-90s – Population viability analysis (PVA) blooms

1984 – IBM and chemical stress, Kooijman et al. 1983 – Population model for seabird recovery after oil spill, Samnels & Ladino.

1987 – Fish population models: life history, uncertainty and exploitation, Barnthouse et al.

1990s – ATLSS, Across Trophic Level Simulation System, DeAngelis et al.

1982 – Quasi-extinction as a risk concept, Ginzburg et al.

1990 – Density-dependence form and strength affects extinction risk, Ginzburg et al.

1989 – Structured population models: a tool for linking effects at individual and

population level, Nisbet et al.

1982 – The use of life-tables for evaluating the chronic toxicity of pollutants, Gentile et al.

Page 15: Population Models for Ecological Risk Assessment of ... · Population Models for Ecological Risk Assessment of Chemicals: The Past, CREAM, and the Future CREAM Open Conference June

The Modern Era (2)

Year 2000

Year 1990

2002 – Ecological Modeling in Risk Assessment, Pastorok et al.

2000 – Multiple model types applied to pesticide ERA, Bartelll et al.

1997 – First use of population modeling in Superfund ERA, Munns et al.

1996 – Inferring Ecological Risk from Toxicity Bioassays, Ferson et al.

1998 – Action at Distance metapopulation modeling, Spromberg et al.

1998 – EPA Guidelines for Ecological Risk Assessment

2000 – Stochastic population models with endpoint fraction of K, Iwasa et al.

1990s – Population modeling for pesticide risk assessment, Stark et al.

1996 – IBM for pesticide effects on lumbricids, Baveco and DeRoos

2002 – Compensatory response mitigates pesticide effects, Moe et al.

1991 – Use of RAMAS to estimate ecological risk, Ferson et al.

Page 16: Population Models for Ecological Risk Assessment of ... · Population Models for Ecological Risk Assessment of Chemicals: The Past, CREAM, and the Future CREAM Open Conference June

Counter-intuitive Outcomes

“A risk-analytic summary such as the risks

of population decline, rather than any

simple hazard quotient or scalar estimate

of population growth, is the appropriate

endpoint for ecological risk assessment”

Source: Ferson et al. 1996

- - - - = Control Simulation

___ = Decreased Fecundity 20%

Page 17: Population Models for Ecological Risk Assessment of ... · Population Models for Ecological Risk Assessment of Chemicals: The Past, CREAM, and the Future CREAM Open Conference June

Use of Population Modeling in EPA

Superfund Program

Source: Munns et al. 1997

Page 18: Population Models for Ecological Risk Assessment of ... · Population Models for Ecological Risk Assessment of Chemicals: The Past, CREAM, and the Future CREAM Open Conference June

Spatially Explicit Population Modeling

Expands in the 1990s and 2000s

Source: Charles et al. 2009

Source: Topping et al. 2009

Page 19: Population Models for Ecological Risk Assessment of ... · Population Models for Ecological Risk Assessment of Chemicals: The Past, CREAM, and the Future CREAM Open Conference June

The Modern Era (3)

Year 2010

Year 2000

2009-2013 – CREAM: ODD Protocol, TRACE, Grimm et al.

2012-2013 – MODELINK

2007 – LEMTOX workshop, followed by Thorbek et al. 2009, Ecological Models…

2005 – Individual-Based Modelling and Ecology, Grimm and Railsback

2008 – Risk Assessment Forum Technical Workshop on Population-level ERA, USEPA

2005 – DEBtox models with Leslie matrix, Lopes et al.

2007 – Population-level endpoints, Landis et al.

2008 – Population-level Ecological Risk Assessment, Barnthouse et al.

2012 – First ABM in Superfund ERA: mink population, Luxon et al.

2009 – Integration: AChE inhibition, feeding, growth, and population models, Baldwin 2009

2011 – Population models evaluate residual effects of Exxon Valdez, Monson et al. 2011

2002 – Herring gull extinction risk from DDT, DD matrix model, Nakamaru et al. 2002

2004 – First ABM-landscape model combination: skylark, Topping and Odderskaer 2004

2013 – Assessing Risks to Endangered and Threatened Species from Pesticides, NRC

2005 – Pattern-oriented modeling of agent-based complex systems, Grimm et al.

2008 – Demographic Toxicity, Akcakaya et al.

Page 20: Population Models for Ecological Risk Assessment of ... · Population Models for Ecological Risk Assessment of Chemicals: The Past, CREAM, and the Future CREAM Open Conference June

The Future is Here!

• Essential elements for integrating population

modeling into regulatory programs

— Harmonization / Consistency / Credibility of models

— Simplicity of risk communication

— Risk metrics development (precautionary)

— Population-relevant and cost-effective toxicity tests

— Decision framework

— Guidance documents

Page 21: Population Models for Ecological Risk Assessment of ... · Population Models for Ecological Risk Assessment of Chemicals: The Past, CREAM, and the Future CREAM Open Conference June

The Future is Here!

• Research issues

— Behavior of models relative to reality

» Pattern-oriented modeling

— Density dependence

» Form & strength for focal species

» Toxicant interactions

— Landscape effects and scale

— Comparison of different kinds of models

— Quantification of compounding conservatism

Page 22: Population Models for Ecological Risk Assessment of ... · Population Models for Ecological Risk Assessment of Chemicals: The Past, CREAM, and the Future CREAM Open Conference June

Effects of Compounding Conservatism need

to be Explicit

Source: Topping et al. 2009

Page 23: Population Models for Ecological Risk Assessment of ... · Population Models for Ecological Risk Assessment of Chemicals: The Past, CREAM, and the Future CREAM Open Conference June

Creative Exploration of Risk Metrics is

Needed to Address Today’s Issues

Source: Ilwasa et al. 2000 http://www5.ocn.ne.jp/~hakoyama/hiroshi/pdf/Popul_Ecol_2000.pdf

T = Extinction Time

Page 24: Population Models for Ecological Risk Assessment of ... · Population Models for Ecological Risk Assessment of Chemicals: The Past, CREAM, and the Future CREAM Open Conference June

Metric Type Affects Risk Perception

Source: Applied Biomathematics and Woodlot Alternatives 2003

Page 25: Population Models for Ecological Risk Assessment of ... · Population Models for Ecological Risk Assessment of Chemicals: The Past, CREAM, and the Future CREAM Open Conference June

Neq can be used as an Assessment Endpoint

Source: Hayashi et al. 2009

= Brook trout

= Fathead minnow

Note: Neq, equilibrium population size, is

normalized to Neq for 30 ug/L

Page 26: Population Models for Ecological Risk Assessment of ... · Population Models for Ecological Risk Assessment of Chemicals: The Past, CREAM, and the Future CREAM Open Conference June

Is Neq More Sensitive than λ to Toxic Chemicals?

• Uniform density-dependent model for fathead minnow

• Ricker function (e-bN) for all matrix elements

λ = population growth rate

Neq = equilibrium population size

F1, F2, etc = vital rates

Source: Hayashi et al. 2009

Density Independent Uniform Density Dependent

Page 27: Population Models for Ecological Risk Assessment of ... · Population Models for Ecological Risk Assessment of Chemicals: The Past, CREAM, and the Future CREAM Open Conference June

Are Key Metrics Related?

Source: Hendriks et al. 2005

Maybe Not!

Page 28: Population Models for Ecological Risk Assessment of ... · Population Models for Ecological Risk Assessment of Chemicals: The Past, CREAM, and the Future CREAM Open Conference June

Toxicity Test Design Affects Uncertainty

Source: Barnthouse et al. 1990

Concentration-response functions

and uncertainty bands for the effect

of chronic trifluralin exposure on the

average annual recruitment of Gulf

menhaden Brevoortiupatronus.

(A) Life-cycle test data for the

species of interest

(B) Life-cycle test data for a

surrogate species

(C) 96-h LC50 for a surrogate

species

(D) QSARs

Page 29: Population Models for Ecological Risk Assessment of ... · Population Models for Ecological Risk Assessment of Chemicals: The Past, CREAM, and the Future CREAM Open Conference June

Using Demographic Models to Aid Design of

Toxicity Tests

Page 30: Population Models for Ecological Risk Assessment of ... · Population Models for Ecological Risk Assessment of Chemicals: The Past, CREAM, and the Future CREAM Open Conference June

Life History Traits Sensitive to Toxics Have

Low Elasticity for PGR

Source: Forbes et al. 2010

• 4 species

• 54 data sets

Page 31: Population Models for Ecological Risk Assessment of ... · Population Models for Ecological Risk Assessment of Chemicals: The Past, CREAM, and the Future CREAM Open Conference June

Population Modeling of Various Life History

Types Gives Insight to Population Regulation

X = Fish

= Algae

= Benthic macroinvertebrate

+ = Daphnid

Source: Forbes and Calow 2002

Risk Assessment on the Basis

of Simplified Life Histories Calow et al. (1997)

Page 32: Population Models for Ecological Risk Assessment of ... · Population Models for Ecological Risk Assessment of Chemicals: The Past, CREAM, and the Future CREAM Open Conference June

Criteria for Soil, Sediment or Water Quality

Source: Lin and Meng 2009

Comparison of the cumulative distributions of the concentration at λ = 1 for

various dose–response models

Page 33: Population Models for Ecological Risk Assessment of ... · Population Models for Ecological Risk Assessment of Chemicals: The Past, CREAM, and the Future CREAM Open Conference June

First Spatially-Explicit ABM for Mink used to

derive Sediment Criteria at a Superfund Site

Source: Windward Environmental 2013 (related paper by Luxon et al submitted to IEAM)

Page 34: Population Models for Ecological Risk Assessment of ... · Population Models for Ecological Risk Assessment of Chemicals: The Past, CREAM, and the Future CREAM Open Conference June

Mink Spatially-Explicit ABM (cont.)

Note: Additional detailed steps on habitat acquisition removed for brevity.

Source: Windward Environmental 2013 (related paper by Luxon et al submitted to IEAM)

Page 35: Population Models for Ecological Risk Assessment of ... · Population Models for Ecological Risk Assessment of Chemicals: The Past, CREAM, and the Future CREAM Open Conference June

Acceptable Population Risk Translated to

Sediment Remedial Goal for PCBs – Mink ABM

• <30% decrease in kit

production caused no effect

on population size

• Uncertainty in the PCBs

exposure model translated to

95% CI on the remedial goal

(RG)

Source: Windward Environmental 2013 (related paper by

Luxon et al submitted to IEAM)

Zero Effect on

Population Size

Kit Production

NOEL

Tissue Residue

NOEL

Sediment

Remedial Goal

Mean =

85 ug/kg

Page 36: Population Models for Ecological Risk Assessment of ... · Population Models for Ecological Risk Assessment of Chemicals: The Past, CREAM, and the Future CREAM Open Conference June

‘Standard’ Models and Decision Frameworks

for Modeling are Needed

• MODELINK

• Roskilde workshop on Integrating Population

Modeling in Ecological Risk Assessment

• Decision framework for pesticide risk assessment

based on population modeling

Page 37: Population Models for Ecological Risk Assessment of ... · Population Models for Ecological Risk Assessment of Chemicals: The Past, CREAM, and the Future CREAM Open Conference June

Flexibility is Essential

Source: Kapustka et al. (in prep.) for Intrinsik, Inc

Page 38: Population Models for Ecological Risk Assessment of ... · Population Models for Ecological Risk Assessment of Chemicals: The Past, CREAM, and the Future CREAM Open Conference June

Source: Pastorok 2000 SETAC meeting based on DeAngelis et al. 1998

Linking Population Models – The ATLSS

Approach by DeAngelis et al.

Page 39: Population Models for Ecological Risk Assessment of ... · Population Models for Ecological Risk Assessment of Chemicals: The Past, CREAM, and the Future CREAM Open Conference June

Various Model Types for a Pesticide (Diquat

Dibromide) Case Study

Daphnia IBM – based on Hallam et al. 1990

Source: Bartell et al. 2000 and DeAngelis et al. 1989

Bluegill Matrix Model

CASM Ecosystem Model

Page 40: Population Models for Ecological Risk Assessment of ... · Population Models for Ecological Risk Assessment of Chemicals: The Past, CREAM, and the Future CREAM Open Conference June

What Kind of Model and How Complex?

“The issue is not model complexity or population versus

ecosystem models but identifying the necessary and

sufficient model structure and processes that produce

useful and reliable estimates for specific risk assessments

and management decisions based on risk”

Source: http://www.nsf.gov/news/mmg/media/images/daphnia4_h.jpg (left)

http://www.outdooralabama.com/fishing/images/Bluegill400.jpg (middle)

Adapted from DeAngelis et al. 1989 (right)

Page 41: Population Models for Ecological Risk Assessment of ... · Population Models for Ecological Risk Assessment of Chemicals: The Past, CREAM, and the Future CREAM Open Conference June

Climate Change: All Bets are Off

Page 42: Population Models for Ecological Risk Assessment of ... · Population Models for Ecological Risk Assessment of Chemicals: The Past, CREAM, and the Future CREAM Open Conference June

Conclusions

• Population modeling will undoubtedly play a major

role in chemical risk assessments in the near future

• We’ve come a long ways, but significant issues in

risk expression and communication remain

• The effects of climate change will pose new

challenges for risk assessors

• CREAM has already contributed a great deal

• We can look forward to significant ongoing

scientific contributions by CREAM fellows

Page 43: Population Models for Ecological Risk Assessment of ... · Population Models for Ecological Risk Assessment of Chemicals: The Past, CREAM, and the Future CREAM Open Conference June

June 24,2013

Integral Consulting Inc. 1

BIBLIOGRAPHY1

Population Models for Ecological Risk Assessment of Chemicals: The Past, CREAM, and the Future

Akcakaya, H.R., J.D. Stark, and T.S. Bridges (eds). 2008. Demographic toxicity: methods in ecological risk assessment. Oxford University Press, New York, NY.

Anonymous. Undated. The origins of population biology. In: Chapter 1, What is ecology? Available at: web2.uwindsor.ca/courses/biology/weis/55-210/Chapter1.doc

Applied Biomathematics and Woodlot Alternatives. 2003. A stochastic population model incorporating PCB effects for wood frogs (Rana sylvatica) breeding in vernal pools associated with the Housatonic River - Pittsfield to Lenoxdale, Massachusetts. Report to U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 1, Boston, MA. 43 pp.

Aronova, E., K.S. Baker, and N. Oreskes. 2010. Big science and big data in biology: from the international geophysical year through the international biological program to the long term ecological research (LTER) network, 1957–present. Hist. Stud. Nat. Sci. 40:183–224.

Baldwin, D.B., J.A. Spromberg, T.K. Collier, and N.L. Scholz. 2009. A fish of many scales: extrapolating sublethal pesticide exposures to the productivity of wild salmon populations. Ecol. Appl. 19(8):2004–2015.

Barnthouse, L.W., G.W. II Suter, A.E. Rosen, and J.J. Beauchamp. 1987. Estimating responses of fish populations to toxic contaminants. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 6:811–824.

Barnthouse, L.W. 2004. Quantifying population recovery rates for ecological risk assessment. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 23:500–508.

Barnthouse, L.W., G.W. Suter II, and A.E. Rosen. 1989. Inferring population-level significance from individual-level effects: an extrapolation from fisheries science to ecotoxicology. 1989. In: M. Lewis and G.W. Suter II (eds). Aquatic Toxicology and

1 This bibliography is based on the professional experiences of R.A. Pastorok from 1972 to present and is intended to accompany a keynote presentation titled Population Models for Ecological Risk Assessment of Chemicals: The Past, CREAM, and the Future delivered on June 11, 2013 at the CREAM Open Conference in Leipzig, Germany. This bibliography is not comprehensive and is based mainly on references used for the presentation.

Page 44: Population Models for Ecological Risk Assessment of ... · Population Models for Ecological Risk Assessment of Chemicals: The Past, CREAM, and the Future CREAM Open Conference June

Running Head 1 Running Head 2 Month Day, Year

Integral Consulting Inc. 2

Environmental Fate, 11th Volume. STP 1007. American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, PA. pp. 289–300.

Barnthouse, L.W., G.W. Suter II, and A.E. Rosen. 1990. Risks of toxic contaminants to exploited fish populations: influence of life history, data uncertainty and exploitation intensity. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 9:297–311.

Barnthouse, L.W., G.W. Suter II, S.M. Bartell, J.J. Beauchamp, R.H. Gardner, E. Linder, R.V. O’Neill, and A.E. Rosen. 1986. User’s manual for ecological risk assessment. Environmental Sciences Division Publication No. 2679. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Washington, DC, and Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN.

Barnthouse, L.W., W.R. Jr. Munns, and M.T. Sorensen (eds). 2008. Population-level ecological risk assessment. Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton, FL.

Bartell, S.M., K.R. Campbell, C.M. Lovelock, S.K. Nair, and J.L. Shaw. 2000. Characterizing aquatic ecological risks from pesticides using a diquat dibromide case study. III. Ecological process models. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 19(5):1441–1453.

Baveco, J.M., and A.M. de Roos. 1996. Assessing the impact of pesticides on lumbricid populations: an individual-based modelling approach. J. Appl. Ecol. 33:1451−1468.

Botkin, D.B., J.F. Janak, and J.R. Wallis. 1972. Some ecological consequences of a computer model of forest growth. J. Ecol. 60(3):849–872.

Calow P., R. Sibly, and V.E. Forbes. 1997. Risk assessment on the basis of simplified life-history scenarios. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 16:1983-1989.

Caswell, H. 2001. Matrix population models: construction, analysis and interpretation. 2nd ed. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.

Charles S., E. Billoir, C. Lopes, and A. Chaumot. 2009. Matrix population models as relevant modeling tools in ecotoxicology. In: J. Devillers (ed). Ecotoxicology modeling. Springer, NY. pp. 261-298.

Chaumot A., S. Charles, P. Flammarion, and P. Auger. 2003. Do migratory or demographic disruptions rule the population impact of pollution in spatial networks? Theor. Popul. Biol. 64: 473–480.

Daniels, R.E., and J.D. Allan. 1981. Life table evaluation of chronic exposure to a pesticide. Can. J. Fish. Aqua. Sci. 38: 485-494.

Page 45: Population Models for Ecological Risk Assessment of ... · Population Models for Ecological Risk Assessment of Chemicals: The Past, CREAM, and the Future CREAM Open Conference June

Running Head 1 Running Head 2 Month Day, Year

Integral Consulting Inc. 3

Darwin, C. 1859. On the origin of species by means of natural selection. John Murray, London, UK.

DeAngelis, D.L., L.J. Gross, M.A. Huston, W.F. Wolff, D.M. Fleming, E.J. Comiskey, and S.M. Sylvester. 1998. Landscape modeling for everglades ecosystem restoration. Ecosystems 1:64-75.

DeAngelis, D.L., L.J. Svoboda, S.W. Christensen, and D.S. Vaughan. 1979. Stability and return times in Leslie matrices with density-dependent survival: applications to fish populations. Eco. Model. 8:149-163.

DeAngelis, D.L., R.A. Goldstein, and R.V. O’Neill. 1975. A model for trophic interaction. Ecology 56:881–892.

DeAngelis, D.L., S.M. Bartell, and A.L. Brenkert. 1989. Effects of nutrient recycling and food-chain length on resilience. Am. Nat. 134(5):778–805.

Emlen, J.M. 1989. Terrestrial population models for ecological risk assessment: a state-of-the-art review. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 8: 831-842.

Ferson, S., R. Akcakaya, L. Ginzburg, and M Krause. 1991. Use of RAMAS to estimate ecological risk: two fish species case studies. Technical Report AN-7176. Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, CA.

Ferson, S., L.R. Ginzburg, and R.A. Goldstein. 1996. Inferring ecological risk from toxicity bioassays. Water Air Soil Pollut. 90:71–82.

Fibonacci, L. 1202. Liber Abaci, from the Biblioteca Nazionale di Firenze, Florence, Italy.

Foit, K., O. Kaske, and M. Liess. 2012. Competition increases toxicant sensitivity and delays the recovery of two interacting populations. Aq. Toxicol. 106-107: 25-31.

Forbes V.E., and P. Calow. 2002. Population growth rate as a basis for ecological risk assessment of toxic chemicals. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London Ser. B. 357:1299–1306.

Forbes, V.E., and P. Calow. 2012. Promises and problems for the new paradigm for risk assessment and alternative approaches involving predictive systems models. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 31: 2663-2671.

Forbes V.E., M. Olsen, A. Palmqvist, and P. Calow. 2010. Environmentally sensitive life-cycle traits have low elasticity: implications for theory and practice. Ecol. Appl. 20:1449–1455.

Page 46: Population Models for Ecological Risk Assessment of ... · Population Models for Ecological Risk Assessment of Chemicals: The Past, CREAM, and the Future CREAM Open Conference June

Running Head 1 Running Head 2 Month Day, Year

Integral Consulting Inc. 4

Forbes V.E., R.M. Sibly, and P. Calow. 2001. Toxicant impacts on density-limited populations: a critical review of theory, practice and results. Ecol. Appl. 11:1249-1257.

Gentile, J.H., S.M. Gentile, N.G. Hairston, Jr. and B.K. Sullivan. 1982. The use of life-tables for evaluating the chronic toxicity of pollutants to Mysidopsis bahia. Hydrobiologia 93:179-187.

Gergs A., A. Zenker, V. Grimm , and T.G. Preuss. 2013. Chemical and natural stressors combined: from cryptic effects to population extinction. Scientific Reports 3(2036):1-8. DOI:10.1038/srep02036

Ginzburg, L.R., L.B. Slobodkin, K. Johnson, and A.G. Bindman. 1982. Quasiextinction probabilities as a measure of impact on population growth. Risk Anal. 21:171–181.

Ginzburg, L.R., S. Ferson, and H.R. Akçakaya. 1990. Reconstructibility of density dependence and the conservative assessment of extinction risks. Conserv. Biol. 4:63–70.

Grant, A. 1998. Population consequences of chronic toxicity: incorporating density dependence into the analysis of life table response experiments. Ecol. Model. 105:325–335.

Grant, W.E., S.O. Fraser, and K.G. Isakson. 1983. Effect of vertebrate pesticides on non-target wildlife populations: evaluation through modelling. Ecol. Model. 21:85-108.

Graunt, J. 1662. Natural and political observations made upon the bills of mortality. London, UK.

Grimm V., and S.F. Railsback. 2005. Individual-based modelling and ecology. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.

Grimm V., R. Ashauer, V. Forbes, U. Hommen, T.G. Preuss, A. Schmidt, P.J. van den Brink, J. Wogram, and P. Thorbek. 2009. CREAM: a European project on mechanistic effect models for ecological risk assessment of chemicals. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 16:614-617.

Grimm V., U. Berger, F. Bastiansen, et al. 2006. A standard protocol for describing individual-based and agent-based models. Ecol. Model. 198:115-26.

Grimm V., U. Berger, D.L. DeAngelis, G. Polhill, J. Giske, and S.F. Railsback. 2010. The ODD protocol: a review and first update. Ecol. Model. 221:2760–2768.

Grimm, V., and A. Schmolke. 2011. How to read and write TRACE documentations. 1st Draft Report. Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research – UFZ, Department of Ecological Modeling, Leipzig, Germany.

Page 47: Population Models for Ecological Risk Assessment of ... · Population Models for Ecological Risk Assessment of Chemicals: The Past, CREAM, and the Future CREAM Open Conference June

Running Head 1 Running Head 2 Month Day, Year

Integral Consulting Inc. 5

Grimm, V., E. Revilla, U. Berger, F. Jeltsch, W.M. Mooij, S.F. Railsback, H.-H. Thulke, J. Weiner, T. Wiegand, and D.L. DeAngelis. 2005. Pattern-oriented modeling of agent-based complex systems: lessons from ecology. Science 310:987–991.

Hallam T.G., G.A. Canziani, and R.R. Lassiter. 1993. Sublethal narcosis and population persistence: a modeling study on growth effects. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 12:947–954.

Hamda N.T., D.M. Jevtic, and R. Laskowski. 2012. Decomposition analysis of LTREs may help to design short-term ecotoxicological tests. Ecotoxicology 21(5):1504-1512.

Hayashi T., M. Kamo, and Y. Tanaka. 2009. Population-level ecological effect assessment: Estimating the effect of toxic chemicals on density-dependent populations. Ecol. Res. 24(5):945–954.

Hendriks A.J., J.L.M. Maas-Diepeveen, E.H.W. Heugens, and N.M. van Straalen. 2005. Meta-analysis of intrinsic rates of increase and carrying capacity of populations affected by toxic and other stressors. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 24, 2267–2277.

Hutchinson, G.E. 1948. Circular casual systems in ecology. Annal. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 50:221-246.

Iwasa, Y., H. Hakoyama, M. Nakamaru, and J. Nakanishi. 2000. Estimate of population extinction risk and its application to ecological risk management. Popul. Ecol. 42:73−80.

Jager T, E.H.W. Heugens, and S. Kooijman. 2006. Making sense of ecotoxicological test results: towards application of process-based models. Ecotoxicology 15:305–414.

Kapustka, L. et al. 2013. Portion of decision framework for population modeling in pesticide risk assessment. Draft Report in preparation, not for distribution. Prepared for Intrinsik, Inc., Toronto, ON.

Kingsland, S.E. 1995. Modeling nature: episodes in the history of population ecology. University of Chicago Press. Chicago, IL. 267 pp.

Kooijman, S.A.L.M., and J.A.J. Metz. 1984. On the dynamics of chemically stressed populations: the deduction of population consequences from effects on individuals. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 8:254–274.

Lacy, R. C. 2000. Structure of the VORTEX simulation model for population viability analysis. Ecol. Bull. 48:191-203.

Landis, W.G., and L.A. Kaminski. 2007. Population scale assessment endpoints in ecological risk assessment Part 2: selection of assessment endpoint attributes. Integr. Environ. Assess. Manage. 3:450–457.

Page 48: Population Models for Ecological Risk Assessment of ... · Population Models for Ecological Risk Assessment of Chemicals: The Past, CREAM, and the Future CREAM Open Conference June

Running Head 1 Running Head 2 Month Day, Year

Integral Consulting Inc. 6

Leslie P.H. 1945. On the use of matrices in certain population mathematics. Biometrika 33:184–212.

Levins, R. 1969. Some demographic and genetic consequences of environmental heterogeneity for biological control. Bull. Entomol. Soc. Am. 15:237–240.

Liess, M. 2002. Population response to toxicants is altered by intraspecific interaction. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 21 :138–142.

Lin B.L., and Y. Meng. 2009. Extrapolation of available acute and chronic toxicity test data to population-level effects for ecological risk management of chemicals. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 28(7):1557-66. Epub 2009 Feb 24.

Lopes C., A.R.R. P´ery, A. Chaumot, and S. Charles. 2005. Ecotoxicology and population dynamics: using DEBtox models in a Leslie modeling approach. Ecol. Model. 188:30–40.

Lotka, A.J. 1925. Elements of Physical Biology. Reprinted 1956 by Dover Publishing, New York, NY.

Luxon, M. et al. 2012. Manuscript submitted to Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management on an agent-based population model for mink at Portland Harbor Superfund Site. Windward Environmental, Seattle, WA.

Malthus, T.B. 1798 (reprinted 1926). First essay on population (An Essay on the Principle of Population as It Affects the Future Improvement of Society with remarks on the Speculation of Mr. Godwin M. Condorcet and Other Writers). Macmillan & Company, London.

May, R. M. 1974. Biological populations with nonoverlapping generations: stable points, stable cycles, and chaos. Science 186:645–647.

McMenamin, S.K, A.H. Elizabeth, and K.W. Christopher. 2008. Climatic change and wetland desiccation cause amphibian decline in Yellowstone National Park. Proceed. National Acad. Sci. 105(44):16988–16993.

Moe S.J., N.C. Stenseth, and R.H. Smith. 2002. Density-dependent compensation in blowfly populations give indirectly positive effects of a toxicant. Ecology 83:1597–1603.

Moe, S.J. 2006. Density dependence in ecological risk assessment. In: L. W. Barnthouse, W. R. Munns, Jr., and M. T. Sorensen (eds). Population-level ecological risk assessment. SETAC, Pensacola, FL. pp. 69-92.

Page 49: Population Models for Ecological Risk Assessment of ... · Population Models for Ecological Risk Assessment of Chemicals: The Past, CREAM, and the Future CREAM Open Conference June

Running Head 1 Running Head 2 Month Day, Year

Integral Consulting Inc. 7

Monson, D., D. Doak, B.E. Ballachey, and J.L. Bodkin. 2011. Could residual oil from the Exxon Valdez spill create a long-term population ‘‘sink’’ for sea otters in Alaska? Ecol. Appl. 21:2917–2932.

Munns, W.R., Jr., D.E. Black, T.R. Gleason, K. Salomon, D. Bengtson and R. Gutjahr-Gobell. 1997. Evaluation of the effects of dioxin and PCBs on Fundulus heteroclitus populations using a modeling approach. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 16:1074-1081.

Nakamaru, M., Y. Iwasa, and J. Nakanishi. 2002. Extinction risk to Herring Gull populations from DDT exposure. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 21:195-202.

Newnham, R.M. 1964. The development of a stand model for Douglas fir. PhD Thesis. University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC.

Newnham, R. M., and J. H. G. Smith. 1964. Development and testing of stand models for Douglas fir and lodgepole pine. For. Chron. 40(4): 494-502.

Nisbet, R.M., W.S.C. Gurney, W.W. Murdoch, and E. McCauley. 1989. Structured population models: a tool for linking effects at individual and population level. Biol. J. Linnean Soc. 37:79–99.

NRC. 2013. Assessing risks to endangered and threatened species from pesticides. Committee on Ecological Risk Assessment under FIFRA and ESA. National Research Council, National Academy of Sciences, National Academies Press, Washington, DC.

O’Neill, R.V., R.H. Gardner, and L.W. Barnthouse. 1982. Ecosystem risk analysis: a new methodology. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 1:167–177.

O’Neill, R.V., R.H. Gardner, L.W. Barnthouse, G.W. Suter, S.G. Hildebrand, and C.W. Gehrs. 1982. Ecosystem risk analysis: a new methodology. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 1:167-168.

Paine, R.T. 1966. Food web complexity and species diversity. Am. Nat. 100(910):65–75.

Pastorok, R.A. 2000. Evaluation of ecological effects models for use in risk assessment. Diagram of CASM model based on DeAngelis et al. 1989. Presentation at SETAC annual meeting. Nashville, TN.

Pastorok, R.A., S.M. Bartell, S. Ferson, and L.R. Ginsburg (eds). 2002. Ecological modeling in risk assessment. CRC, Boca Raton, FL. 302 pp.

Pearl, R. 1925. The biology of population growth. Alfred Knopf, New York, NY.

Page 50: Population Models for Ecological Risk Assessment of ... · Population Models for Ecological Risk Assessment of Chemicals: The Past, CREAM, and the Future CREAM Open Conference June

Running Head 1 Running Head 2 Month Day, Year

Integral Consulting Inc. 8

Petty, W. 1683. Maximum sustainable population size: another essay in political arithmetic.

Reid D.G., R.A. Ims, N.M. Schmidt, G. Gauthier, and D. Ehrich. 2012. Lemmings (Lemmus and Dicrostonyx spp.). Available at: http://www.arctic.noaa.gov/reportcard/lemmings.html. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, ClimateWatch Magazine, Washington, DC.

Ricker, W.E. 1954. Stock and recruitment. J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 11:559–623.

Sæther, B.E., S. Engen, and E. Matthysen. 2002. Demographic characteristics and population dynamical patterns of solitary birds. Science 295:2070-2073.

Samuals, W.B., and A. Ladino. 1983. Calculations of seabird population recovery from potential oil spills in the mid-Atlantic region of the United States. Ecol. Model. 21:63-84.

Shaffer, M.L. 1978. Determining minimum viable population sizes: a case study of the grizzly bear (Ursus arctos L.). Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. Duke University, Durham, NC.

Sibley, R.M. 1996. Effects of pollutants on individual life histories and population growth rates. In: Ecotoxicology: a hierarchical treatment. M.C. Newman and C.H. Jagoe (eds). Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL. pp. 197–223.

Spromberg, J.A., B.M. Johns, and W.G. Landis. 1998. Metapopulation dynamics: indirect effects and multiple discrete outcomes in ecological risk assessment. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 17:1640–1649.

Stark, J.D., and U. Wennergren. 1995. Can population effects of pesticides be predicted from demographic toxicological studies. J. Econ. Entomol. 88:1089–1096.

Thorbek P., V. Forbes, F. Heimbach, U. Hommen, H.H. Thulke, P.J. van den Brink, J. Wogram, and V. Grimm (eds). 2009. Ecological models for regulatory risk assessments of pesticides: developing a strategy for the future. Soc. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. (SETAC) and CRC Press, Pensacola and Boca Raton, FL.

Tipton, A.R., R.J. Kendall, J.F. Coyle, and P.F. Scanlon. 1980. A model of the impact of methyl parathion spraying on a quail population. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 25:586–593.

Topping C.J., and P. Odderskaer. 2004. Modeling the influence of temporal and spatial factors on the assessment of impacts of pesticides on skylarks. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 23:509–520.

Page 51: Population Models for Ecological Risk Assessment of ... · Population Models for Ecological Risk Assessment of Chemicals: The Past, CREAM, and the Future CREAM Open Conference June

Running Head 1 Running Head 2 Month Day, Year

Integral Consulting Inc. 9

Topping C.J., T. Dalkvist, V.E. Forbes, et al. 2009. The potential for the use of agent-based models in ecotoxicology. In: Devillers, J. (ed). Ecotoxicology modelling, emerging topics in ecotoxicology: principles, approaches and perspectives 2. Springer, New York, NY. pp. 205–235.

USEPA. 1989. Carbofuran: special review technical report document. PB 89 168 884. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA.

USEPA. 1992. Framework for ecological risk assessment. EPA/630/R-92/001. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Risk Assessment Forum, Washington, DC.

USEPA. 1998. Guidelines for ecological risk assessment. EPA/30/R-95/002F. Available at: http://www.epa.gov/raf/publications/pdfs/ECOTXTBX.PDF. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.

USEPA. 2009. Summary report: risk assessment forum technical workshop on population-level ecological risk assessment. EPA/100/R-09/006. Risk Assessment Forum, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.

Verhulst, P.F. 1838. Notice sur la loi que la population suit dans son accroisssement. Corresp. Math. Phys. 10:113–121. [Translation in Kormandy, E.J. 1965. Readings in ecology. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ].

von Bertalanffy, L. 1950s. General systems theory. Discussion available at: http://business.nmsu.edu/~dboje/655/655_overview.htm.

Waller, W.T., M.L. Dahlberg, R.E. Sparks, and J. Cairns, Jr. 1971. A computer simulation of the effects of superimposed mortality due to pollutants on populations of fathead minnows (Pimephales promelas). J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 28:1107–1112.

Walthall, W.K., and J.D. Stark. 1997. Comparison of two population-level ecotoxicological endpoints: the intrinsic (rm) and instantaneous (ri) rates of increase. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 16:1068–1073.