pomona meth sweep - indictment
TRANSCRIPT
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
June 2012 Grand Jury
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff,
v.
JOSE JUAN GARCIA BARRON, aka “Tokes,”MARTIN BARRON ALCAZAR, aka “Quiniki,” aka “Quini,” aka “Martin Garcia Barron,”RUDY ARMA, JOSE CHAVEZ ESPINOSA, aka “Guerrin,”ENRIQUE CENTENO REYES, aka “Gordo,” aka “Gordito,”JORGE LUIS BARRON ZARATE, aka “Qoi,” aka “Coyote,”TONY LNU,JOSE MARIA CHAVEZ JR., aka “Jose M. Chavez Valencia,” aka “Chema,”JOSE MARIA CHAVEZ, aka “Chemita,”DANIEL LUPIAN, aka “Yogi,” aka “Nariz de Chupon,”INES CASTILLION JOYA,FNU LNU, aka “Borrachin,” aka “Borrachillo,”
))))) ) ) ) ) )))))))))))))))))))))))))))
No. CR 12-
I N D I C T M E N T
[21 U.S.C. § 846: Conspiracy to Manufacture, Possess withIntent to Distribute, andDistribute Methamphetamine; 21U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(A),(b)(1)(B), (b)(1)(C):Distribution of and Possessionwith Intent to DistributeMethamphetamine; 21 U.S.C. § 856(a)(1): Maintaining DrugInvolved Premises]
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
JORGE RUELAS, aka “Fat Boy,”RUDY ZEPEDA, aka “Virolo,” aka “Ojon,”JOSE ALVARADO,DAVID AGUILAR,RAFAEL FAVELA, aka “Chito,”SARA GARRIDO,OSCAR ROBLES, aka “Squeaks,” aka “Squeaky,”MIGUEL SAUCEDO, aka “Blackie,” aka “Blacks,”ANDRES YEPEZ,DANIEL YEPEZ, aka “Chamboogie,”MIGUEL ZARAGOZA, aka “Grumpy,”PETE LNU,CHRISTOPHER ALVARADO,ISAAC CERVANTES, aka “Bill,” aka “Wild Bill,” andMARCOS OREJEL, aka “Piolin,”
Defendants._____________________________
)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
The Grand Jury charges:
COUNT ONE
[21 U.S.C. § 846]
A. OBJECTS OF THE CONSPIRACY
Beginning on an unknown date, and continuing to on or about
June 7, 2012, in Los Angeles County, San Bernardino County,
Orange County, and Riverside County, within the Central District
of California, and elsewhere, defendants JOSE JUAN GARCIA BARRON,
also known as (“aka”) “Tokes” (“BARRON”), MARTIN BARRON ALCAZAR,
aka “Quiniki,” aka “Quini,” aka “Martin Garcia Barron”
(“ALCAZAR”), RUDY ARMA (“ARMA”), JOSE CHAVEZ ESPINOSA, aka
2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
“Guerrin” (“ESPINOSA”), ENRIQUE CENTENO REYES, aka “Gordo,” aka
“Gordito” “REYES”), JORGE LUIS BARRON ZARATE, aka “Qoi,” aka
“Coyote” (“ZARATE”), TONY LNU (“TONY”), JOSE MARIA CHAVEZ JR.,
aka “Jose M. Chavez Valencia,” aka “Chema” (“CHAVEZ JR.”), JOSE
MARIA CHAVEZ, aka “Chemita” (“CHAVEZ”), DANIEL LUPIAN, aka
“Yogi,” aka “Nariz de Chupon” (“LUPIAN”), INES CASTILLION JOYA
(“JOYA”), FNU LNU, aka “Borrachin,” aka “Borrachillo”
(“BORRACHIN”), JORGE RUELAS, aka “Fat Boy” (“RUELAS”), RUDY
ZEPEDA, aka “Virolo,” aka “Ojon” (“ZEPEDA”), JOSE ALVARADO (“J.
ALVARADO”), DAVID AGUILAR (“AGUILAR”), RAFAEL FAVELA, aka “Chito”
(“FAVELA”), SARA GARRIDO (“GARRIDO”), OSCAR ROBLES, aka
“Squeaks,” aka “Squeaky” (“ROBLES”), MIGUEL SAUCEDO, aka
“Blackie,” aka “Blacks” (“SAUCEDO”), ANDRES YEPEZ (“A. YEPEZ”),
DANIEL YEPEZ, aka “Chamboogie” (“D. YEPEZ”), MIGUEL ZARAGOZA, aka
“Grumpy” (“ZARAGOZA”), PETE LNU (“PETE”), CHRISTOPHER ALVARADO
(“C. ALVARADO”), ISAAC CERVANTES, aka “Bill,” aka “Wild Bill”
(“CERVANTES”), and MARCOS OREJEL, aka “Piolin” (“OREJEL”), and
others known and unknown to the Grand Jury, conspired and agreed
with each other to knowingly and intentionally commit the
following offenses defined in Subchapter I of Chapter 13, Title
21, United States Code, namely:
1. To manufacture, possess with intent to distribute, and
distribute at least 500 grams of a mixture or substance
containing a detectable amount of methamphetamine, a Schedule II
controlled substance, in violation of Title 21, United States
Code, Sections 841(a)(1) and (b)(1)(A)(viii);
2. To manufacture, possess with intent to distribute, and
distribute at least 50 grams of methamphetamine, a Schedule II
3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
controlled substance, in violation of Title 21, United States
Code, Sections 841(a)(1) and (b)(1)(A)(viii);
3. To manufacture, possess with intent to distribute, and
distribute at least 50 grams of a mixture or substance containing
a detectable amount of methamphetamine, a Schedule II controlled
substance, in violation of Title 21, United States Code, Sections
841(a)(1) and (b)(1)(B)(viii);
4. To manufacture, possess with intent to distribute, and
distribute at least five grams of methamphetamine, a Schedule II
controlled substance, in violation of Title 21, United States
Code, Sections 841(a)(1) and (b)(1)(B)(viii);
5. To manufacture, possess with intent to distribute, and
distribute methamphetamine, a Schedule II controlled substance,
in violation of Title 21, United States Code, Sections 841(a)(1)
and (b)(1)(C); and
6. To maintain a drug-involved premises, in violation of
Title 21, United States Code, Section 856(a)(1).
B. MEANS BY WHICH THE OBJECTS OF THE CONSPIRACY WERE TO BE
ACCOMPLISHED
The objects of the conspiracy were to be accomplished, in
substance, as follows:
1. Defendant BARRON would obtain methamphetamine from a
supplier in Mexico.
2. Defendant BARRON would arrange for the methamphetamine
to be shipped from Mexico to Southern California.
3. Defendant ALCAZAR would coordinate the receipt of the
methamphetamine from Mexico into Southern California.
4. Defendant ALCAZAR would direct the re-crystallization
4
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
of methamphetamine and the conversion of liquid methamphetamine
into crystallized methamphetamine upon its arrival in California.
5. Defendant ESPINOSA would coordinate the distribution of
methamphetamine to defendant BORRACHIN and other customers.
6. Defendants REYES and ZARATE would maintain a storage
location for methamphetamine at 952 East Nocta Street, Unit B, in
Ontario, California (the “Nocta Street Stash House”).
7. Defendant ZARATE would manufacture methamphetamine at
the direction of defendants ALCAZAR and ESPINOSA by re-
crystallizing the methamphetamine shipped from Mexico to Southern
California.
8. Defendants REYES, ZARATE, and CHAVEZ JR. would
manufacture methamphetamine by converting liquid methamphetamine
into crystallized methamphetamine.
9. Defendant ALCAZAR would direct defendant ZARATE to
distribute methamphetamine to defendants REYES, CHAVEZ JR., and
ZEPEDA.
10. Defendant ALCAZAR would manage the distribution of
methamphetamine to defendants CHAVEZ JR., JOYA, BORRACHIN,
RUELAS, and ZEPEDA.
11. Defendant TONY would distribute methamphetamine to
defendant LUPIAN.
12. Defendant LUPIAN would distribute methamphetamine to
defendants CHAVEZ JR., CHAVEZ, CERVANTES, and OREJEL, and other
unknown customers.
13. Defendant CHAVEZ JR. would distribute methamphetamine
to defendants CHAVEZ, RUELAS, ZEPEDA, J. ALVARDO, AGUILAR,
FAVELA, GARRIDO, ROBLES, SAUCEDO, A. YEPEZ, D. YEPEZ, ZARAGOZA,
5
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
and PETE, and other unknown customers, which they, in turn, would
redistribute.
14. Defendant CHAVEZ would distribute methamphetamine to
defendants CHAVEZ JR. and LUPIAN, and other unknown customers.
15. Defendants JOYA, BORRACHIN, RUELAS, ZEPEDA, J.
ALVARADO, AGUILAR, FAVELA, S. GARRIDO, ROBLES, SAUCEDO, A. YEPEZ,
D. YEPEZ, ZARAGOZA, and PETE would distribute methamphetamine to
unknown customers.
16. Defendant C. ALVARADO would arrange methamphetamine
transactions for defendant OREJEL.
17. Defendant TONY would collect drug proceeds from
defendant LUPIAN for defendant ALCAZAR.
18. Defendants ALCAZAR and ESPINOSA would coordinate the
shipment of drug proceeds to defendant BARRON in Mexico through
defendant ARMA.
19. Defendant ARMA would collect drug proceeds from
defendants ALCAZAR and ESPINOSA on behalf of defendant BARRON.
C. OVERT ACTS
In furtherance of the conspiracy and to accomplish the
objects of the conspiracy, on or about the following dates,
defendants BARRON, ALCAZAR, ARMA, ESPINOSA, REYES, ZARATE, TONY,
CHAVEZ JR., CHAVEZ, LUPIAN, JOYA, BORRACHIN, RUELAS, ZEPEDA, J.
ALVARADO, AGUILAR, FAVELA, GARRIDO, ROBLES, SAUCEDO, A. YEPEZ, D.
YEPEZ, ZARAGOZA, PETE, C. ALVARADO, CERVANTES, and OREJEL, and
others known and unknown to the Grand Jury, committed various
overt acts within the Central District of California, and
elsewhere, including, but not limited to, the following:
1. On April 15, 2011, in coded language during telephone
6
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
calls and text messages, defendant ZEPEDA told a confidential
informant working for the Federal Bureau of Investigation (“the
CI”) that he would sell methamphetamine to the CI for a price of
$1,200 per ounce.
2. On April 15, 2011, in coded language during a telephone
call, defendant ZEPEDA told the CI that defendant ZEPEDA’s
brother-in-law would be bringing the methamphetamine to defendant
ZEPEDA.
3. On April 15, 2011, defendant CHAVEZ JR. supplied
approximately 26.7 grams of a mixture or substance containing a
detectable amount of methamphetamine (containing approximately
26.4 grams of actual methamphetamine) to defendant ZEPEDA for
sale to the CI.
4. On April 15, 2011, defendant ZEPEDA sold approximately
26.7 grams of a mixture or substance containing a detectable
amount of methamphetamine (containing approximately 26.4 of grams
of actual methamphetamine) to the CI in exchange for $1,200.
5. On May 11, 2011, defendant ZEPEDA sold approximately
13.9 grams of a mixture or substance containing a detectable
amount of methamphetamine (containing approximately 13.7 grams of
actual methamphetamine) to the CI in exchange for $600.
6. On June 3, 2011, defendant C. ALVARADO, in coded
language during telephone calls and text messages, arranged to
sell approximately one-half ounce of methamphetamine to the CI.
7. On June 3, 2011, defendant OREJEL drove defendant C.
ALVARADO to pick up the CI to complete the methamphetamine
transaction.
8. On June 3, 2011, defendant OREJEL drove defendant C.
7
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ALVARADO and the CI to defendant LUPIAN’s ranch in Ontario,
California, to complete the methamphetamine transaction.
9. On June 3, 2011, defendant LUPIAN supplied
approximately 12.5 grams of a mixture or substance containing a
detectable amount of methamphetamine (containing approximately
12.3 grams of actual methamphetamine) to defendant OREJEL so it
could be sold to the CI.
10. On June 3, 2011, defendant OREJEL sold approximately
12.5 grams of a mixture or substance containing a detectable
amount of methamphetamine (containing approximately 12.3 grams of
actual methamphetamine) to the CI in exchange for $600.
11. On June 3, 2011, defendant OREJEL paid defendant C.
ALVARADO $50 for arranging the methamphetamine transaction with
the CI.
12. On June 3, 2011, defendant OREJEL told the CI to obtain
his phone number from defendant C. ALVARADO so the CI could
contact him to conduct future methamphetamine transactions.
13. On June 3, 2011, defendant C. ALVARADO gave defendant
OREJEL’S phone number to the CI so the CI could contact defendant
OREJEL to conduct future methamphetamine transactions.
14. On July 6 and 7, 2011, defendant OREJEL, in coded
language during telephone calls, agreed to sell approximately one
ounce of methamphetamine to the CI for $1,000.
15. On July 7, 2011, defendant OREJEL, accompanied by
defendant J. ALVARADO, sold approximately 27.5 grams of a mixture
or substance containing a detectable amount of methamphetamine
(containing approximately 27.2 grams of actual methamphetamine)
to the CI in exchange for $1,000.
8
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
16. From July 9 through July 13, 2011, defendant J.
ALVARADO, in coded language during telephone calls and text
messages, arranged to sell approximately one ounce of
methamphetamine to the CI for $1,000.
17. On July 13, 2011, defendant J. ALVARADO sold
approximately 27.4 grams of a mixture or substance containing a
detectable amount of methamphetamine (containing approximately
26.6 grams of actual methamphetamine) to the CI in exchange for
$1,000.
18. On July 20 and 21, 2011, defendant OREJEL, in coded
language during telephone calls, arranged to sell approximately
one and one-half ounces of methamphetamine to the CI.
19. On July 21, 2011, defendant OREJEL sold approximately
41.5 grams of a mixture or substance containing a detectable
amount of methamphetamine (containing approximately 40.6 grams
of actual methamphetamine) to the CI in exchange for $1,500.
20. On July 27 and 28, 2011, defendant ZEPEDA, in coded
language during telephone calls, arranged to sell approximately
one-half ounce of methamphetamine to the CI for $500.
21. On July 28, 2011, defendant CHAVEZ JR. supplied
approximately 13.9 grams of a mixture or substance containing a
detectable amount of methamphetamine (containing approximately
13.7 grams of actual methamphetamine) to defendant ZEPEDA so it
could be sold to the CI.
22. On July 28, 2011, defendant ZEPEDA sold approximately
13.9 grams of a mixture or substance containing a detectable
amount of methamphetamine (containing approximately 13.7 grams of
actual methamphetamine) to the CI in exchange for $500.
9
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
23. On July 28, 2011, defendant CHAVEZ JR. called the CI,
provided the CI with his phone number, and told the CI that he
could provide whatever amount of methamphetamine that the CI
needed.
24. On August 18 and 19, 2011, defendant CHAVEZ JR., in
coded language during telephone calls, arranged to sell
approximately two ounces of methamphetamine to the CI for $1,700.
25. On August 19, 2011, defendant CHAVEZ JR. distributed
approximately 48.3 grams of a mixture or substance containing a
detectable amount of methamphetamine (containing approximately
46.8 grams of actual methamphetamine) to the CI in exchange for
$1,700.
26. On August 31 and September 1, 2011, defendant J.
ALVARADO, in coded language during telephone calls and text
messages, arranged to sell approximately seven grams of
methamphetamine to the CI for $280.
27. On September 1, 2011, defendant J. ALVARADO sold
approximately 4.6 grams of a mixture or substance containing a
detectable amount of methamphetamine (containing approximately
4.5 grams of actual methamphetamine) to the CI in exchange for
$280.
28. On September 13 and 14, 2011, defendant ZEPEDA, in
coded language during telephone calls, arranged to sell
approximately one ounce of methamphetamine to the CI for $750.
29. On September 14, 2011, defendant ZEPEDA sold
approximately 24.3 grams of a mixture or substance containing a
detectable amount of methamphetamine (containing approximately
23.9 grams of actual methamphetamine) to the CI in exchange for
10
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
$750.
30. From September 20 through September 22, 2011, defendant
CHAVEZ JR., in coded language during telephone calls and text
messages, arranged to sell approximately one and one-half ounces
of methamphetamine to the CI for $1,090.
31. On September 22, 2011, defendant CHAVEZ JR. sold
approximately 36.5 grams of a mixture or substance containing a
detectable amount of methamphetamine (containing approximately
35.4 grams of actual methamphetamine) to the CI in exchange for
$1,090.
32. On September 27 and 28, 2011, defendant CHAVEZ JR., in
coded language during telephone calls and text messages, arranged
to sell approximately one ounce of methamphetamine to the CI for
$725.
33. On September 28, 2011, defendant CHAVEZ JR. sold
approximately 24.3 grams of a mixture or substance containing a
detectable amount of methamphetamine (containing approximately
23.5 grams of actual methamphetamine) to the CI in exchange for
$725.
34. On October 6 and 7, 2011, defendant CHAVEZ JR., in
coded language during telephone calls and text messages, arranged
to sell approximately one and one-half ounces of methamphetamine
to the CI for $1,100.
35. On October 7, 2011, defendant CHAVEZ JR. sold
approximately 49 grams of a mixture or substance containing a
detectable amount of methamphetamine to the CI in exchange
$1,100.
36. On October 7, 2011, defendant CHAVEZ JR., in coded
11
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
language during telephone calls and text messages, told the CI
that there was a problem with the quality of the methamphetamine
defendant CHAVEZ JR. had previously sold to the CI and offered to
exchange it for new, better quality methamphetamine.
37. On October 7, 2011, defendant CHAVEZ JR. distributed
approximately 49.0 grams of a mixture or substance containing a
detectable amount of methamphetamine (containing approximately
48.2 grams of actual methamphetamine) to the CI in exchange for
the previously distributed 49 grams of poor quality
methamphetamine and an additional $180.
38. On October 18 and 19, 2011, defendant CHAVEZ JR., in
coded language during telephone calls and text messages, arranged
to sell approximately one ounce of methamphetamine to the CI for
$725.
39. On October 19, 2011, defendant CHAVEZ JR. sold
approximately 26.0 grams of a mixture or substance containing a
detectable amount of methamphetamine (containing approximately
25.5 grams of actual methamphetamine) to the CI in exchange for
$725.
40. On October 27 and 28, 2011, defendant CHAVEZ JR., in
coded language during telephone calls, arranged to sell
approximately two ounces of methamphetamine to the CI for $1,450.
41. On October 28, 2011, defendant CHAVEZ JR. sold
approximately 53.3 grams of a mixture or substance containing a
detectable amount of methamphetamine (containing approximately
51.6 grams of actual methamphetamine) to the CI in exchange for
$1,450.
42. On November 10, 2011, defendant CHAVEZ JR., in coded
12
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
language during telephone calls and text messages, arranged to
sell $600 worth of methamphetamine to the CI.
43. On November 10, 2011, defendant CHAVEZ JR. sold
approximately 17.0 grams of a mixture or substance containing a
detectable amount of methamphetamine (containing approximately
16.5 grams of actual methamphetamine) to the CI in exchange for
$600.
44. On November 30 and December 1, 2011, defendant CHAVEZ
JR., in coded language during telephone calls and text messages,
arranged to sell approximately three and one-half ounces of
methamphetamine to the CI for $2,360.
45. On December 1, 2011, defendant CHAVEZ JR. sold
approximately 83.9 grams of a mixture or substance containing a
detectable amount of methamphetamine (containing approximately
81.8 grams of actual methamphetamine) to the CI in exchange for
$2,360.
46. On December 15 and 16, 2011, defendant CHAVEZ JR., in
coded language during telephone calls and text messages, arranged
to sell approximately one-half pound of methamphetamine to the CI
for $2,900.
47. On December 16, 2011, defendant CHAVEZ JR. sold
approximately 111.3 grams of a mixture or substance containing a
detectable amount of methamphetamine (containing approximately
111.1 grams of actual methamphetamine) to the CI in exchange for
$2,900.
48. From December 19 through December 21, 2011, defendant
CHAVEZ JR., in coded language during telephone calls and text
messages, arranged to sell approximately two and one-half ounces
13
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
of methamphetamine to the CI for $1,600.
49. On December 21, 2011, defendant CHAVEZ JR. sold
approximately 62.2 grams of a mixture or substance containing a
detectable amount of methamphetamine (containing approximately
61.9 grams of actual methamphetamine) to the CI in exchange for
$1,600.
50. On January 5 and 6, 2012, defendant CHAVEZ JR., in
coded language during telephone calls and text messages, arranged
to sell approximately one-quarter pound of methamphetamine to the
CI for $2,900.
51. On January 6, 2012, defendant CHAVEZ JR. sold
approximately 110.6 grams of a mixture or substance containing a
detectable amount of methamphetamine (containing approximately
110.4 grams of actual methamphetamine) to the CI in exchange for
$2,900.
52. On January 6, 2012, defendant CHAVEZ JR. advised the CI
that defendant CHAVEZ JR. would give the CI a discount in price
for orders of methamphetamine in one-quarter pound quantities or
higher.
53. From January 23 through January 25, 2012, defendant
CHAVEZ JR., in coded language during telephone calls and text
messages, arranged to sell approximately one-quarter pound of
methamphetamine to the CI for $2,700.
54. On January 25, 2012, defendant CHAVEZ JR. sold
approximately 111.3 grams of a mixture or substance containing a
detectable amount of methamphetamine (containing approximately
110.1 grams of actual methamphetamine) to the CI in exchange for
$2,900, which included an additional $200 that defendant CHAVEZ
14
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
JR. claimed the CI owed to him.
55. From February 1 through February 6, 2012, defendant
CHAVEZ JR., in coded language during telephone calls and text
messages, arranged to sell approximately two and one-quarter
ounces of methamphetamine to the CI for $1,600.
56. On February 6, 2012, defendant CHAVEZ JR. sold
approximately 62.2 grams of a mixture or substance containing a
detectable amount of methamphetamine (containing approximately
62.0 grams of actual methamphetamine) to the CI in exchange for
$1,600.
57. On February 16, 2012, defendants CHAVEZ JR. and FAVELA
arranged to meet so that defendant CHAVEZ JR. could provide
defendant FAVELA with approximately one-half ounce of
methamphetamine.
58. On February 16, 2012, defendant CHAVEZ JR. distributed
approximately one-half ounce of methamphetamine to defendant
FAVELA for redistribution by defendant FAVELA.
59. On February 16, 2012, defendant ALCAZAR directed
defendant CHAVEZ JR. to leave $1,500 in drug proceeds with
defendant CHAVEZ JR.’s father to give to defendant BARRON.
60. On February 16, 2012, defendant CHAVEZ JR. delivered
$1,500 in drug proceeds to his father.
61. On February 16, 2012, defendant LUPIAN distributed
approximately one pound of methamphetamine to defendant CHAVEZ
JR. for redistribution by defendant CHAVEZ JR.
62. On February 17, 2012, in coded language during a
telephone call, defendant CHAVEZ JR. offered to sell one-half
ounce of methamphetamine to defendant FAVELA, and defendant
15
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
FAVELA agreed to purchase the methamphetamine from defendant
CHAVEZ JR.
63. On February 17, 2012, defendant CHAVEZ JR. distributed
approximately one-half ounce of methamphetamine to defendant
FAVELA in the area of 285 West Center Street, Pomona, California,
for distribution by defendant FAVELA.
64. On February 18, 2012, in coded language during
telephone calls, defendant SAUCEDO ordered one ounce of
methamphetamine from defendant CHAVEZ JR.
65. On February 19, 2012, defendant CHAVEZ JR. distributed
approximately one ounce of methamphetamine to defendant SAUCEDO
for redistribution by defendant SAUCEDO.
66. On February 19, 2012, in coded language during a
telephone call, defendant ALCAZAR advised defendant CHAVEZ JR.
that defendant ALCAZAR possessed approximately one-half pound of
methamphetamine.
67. On February 20, 2012, defendant SAUCEDO sold
approximately one ounce of methamphetamine to an unknown
customer.
68. On February 20, 2012, defendant SAUCEDO ordered one
ounce of methamphetamine from defendant CHAVEZ JR.
69. On February 20, 2012, defendant CHAVEZ JR. distributed
approximately one ounce of methamphetamine to defendant SAUCEDO
for redistribution by defendant SAUCEDO.
70. On February 20, 2012, in coded language during a
telephone call, defendant CHAVEZ JR. offered one-half ounce of
methamphetamine to defendant FAVELA, and defendant FAVELA agreed
to purchase the methamphetamine from defendant CHAVEZ JR.
16
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
71. On February 21, 2012, in coded language during
telephone calls, defendant ROBLES ordered approximately
one-quarter pound of methamphetamine from defendant CHAVEZ JR.,
and defendant CHAVEZ JR. agreed to sell the methamphetamine to
defendant ROBLES.
72. On February 21, 2012, in coded language during
telephone calls, defendant CHAVEZ JR. arranged to purchase
approximately one-quarter pound of methamphetamine from defendant
LUPIAN for further sale to defendant ROBLES.
73. On February 21, 2012, defendant CHAVEZ JR. obtained
approximately one-quarter pound of methamphetamine from defendant
LUPIAN’s ranch in Ontario, California.
74. On February 21, 2012, defendant CHAVEZ JR. sold
approximately one-quarter pound of methamphetamine to defendant
ROBLES in exchange for $1,700 for redistribution by defendant
ROBLES.
75. From February 17 through February 21, 2012, in coded
language during telephone calls and text messages, defendant
CHAVEZ JR. agreed to sell $3,000 worth of methamphetamine to the
CI.
76. On February 20, 2012, in coded language during a
telephone call, defendant CHAVEZ JR. arranged to obtain
approximately one-quarter pound of methamphetamine from defendant
ALCAZAR for sale to the CI.
77. On February 21, 2012, defendant ALCAZAR distributed
approximately one-quarter pound of methamphetamine to defendant
CHAVEZ JR. in the area of 285 West Center Street, Pomona,
California.
17
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
78. On February 21, 2012, defendant CHAVEZ JR. sold
approximately 124.7 grams of a mixture or substance containing a
detectable amount of methamphetamine (containing 124.7 grams of
actual methamphetamine) to the CI in exchange for $3,000.
79. On February 23, 2012, in coded language during a
telephone call, defendant CHAVEZ JR. offered to sell
approximately one ounce of methamphetamine to defendant SAUCEDO.
80. On February 23, 2012, in coded language during a
telephone call, defendant SAUCEDO asked defendant CHAVEZ JR.
about the quality of the one ounce of methamphetamine that
defendant CHAVEZ JR. had offered for sale, and when defendant
CHAVEZ JR. responded that the methamphetamine was “fire” (good
quality), defendant SAUCEDO agreed to purchase the
methamphetamine.
81. On February 24, 2012, defendant GARRIDO paid $300 to
defendant CHAVEZ JR. in exchange for methamphetamine.
82. On February 24, 2012, defendant FAVELA ordered
approximately one-half ounce of methamphetamine from defendant
CHAVEZ JR.
83. On February 24, 2012, defendant CHAVEZ JR. distributed
approximately one-half ounce of methamphetamine to defendant
FAVELA for redistribution by defendant FAVELA.
84. On February 24, 2012, in coded language during a
telephone call, defendant AGUILAR asked to purchase approximately
one ounce of methamphetamine from defendant CHAVEZ JR. and told
defendant CHAVEZ JR. that he had money for the methamphetamine.
85. On February 24, 2012, defendant CHAVEZ JR. sold
approximately one ounce of methamphetamine to defendant AGUILAR
18
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
for redistribution by defendant AGUILAR.
86. On February 29, 2012, defendant GARRIDO paid $200 to
defendant CHAVEZ JR. for methamphetamine.
87. On March 2, 2012, in coded language during a telephone
call, defendant CHAVEZ JR. asked defendant CHAVEZ for
methamphetamine and advised that he needed approximately two or
two and one-half ounces of methamphetamine.
88. On March 3, 2012, in coded language during a telephone
call, defendant CHAVEZ advised defendant CHAVEZ JR. that he had
approximately one ounce of methamphetamine available to sell to
defendant CHAVEZ JR.
89. On March 3, 2012, in coded language during a telephone
call, defendant CHAVEZ JR. agreed to purchase approximately one
ounce of methamphetamine from defendant CHAVEZ.
90. On March 3, 2012, defendant CHAVEZ distributed
approximately one ounce of methamphetamine to defendant CHAVEZ
JR. for redistribution by defendant CHAVEZ JR.
91. On March 4, 2012, defendant CHAVEZ JR. distributed
approximately one ounce of methamphetamine to defendant SAUCEDO
for redistribution by defendant SAUCEDO.
92. On March 4, 2012, in coded language during a telephone
call, defendant CHAVEZ JR. offered to sell methamphetamine to
defendant GARRIDO, and defendant GARRIDO agreed to purchase
methamphetamine from defendant CHAVEZ JR.
93. From March 3 through March 4, 2012, in coded language
during telephone calls and text messages, defendant J. ALVARADO
asked defendant CHAVEZ JR. for $350 worth of methamphetamine.
94. On March 4, 2012, defendant CHAVEZ JR. sold
19
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
approximately one-quarter ounce of methamphetamine to defendant
J. ALVARADO for redistribution by defendant J. ALVARADO.
95. On March 4, 2012, in coded language during a telephone
call, defendant ROBLES asked to purchase approximately
one-quarter pound of methamphetamine from defendant CHAVEZ JR.
96. On March 4, 2012, in coded language during a telephone
call, defendant CHAVEZ JR. asked to purchase approximately one-
quarter pound of methamphetamine from defendant ALCAZAR to sell
to defendant ROBLES.
97. On March 4, 2012, in coded language during a telephone
call, defendant ALCAZAR advised that he could provide one-quarter
pound of methamphetamine to defendant CHAVEZ JR. in two hours.
98. On March 4, 2012, at the direction of defendant
ALCAZAR, defendant CHAVEZ JR. picked up approximately one-quarter
pound of methamphetamine from the Nocta Street Stash House.
99. On March 4, 2012, defendant CHAVEZ JR. sold
approximately one-quarter pound of methamphetamine to defendant
ROBLES in Pomona, California, for redistribution by defendant
ROBLES.
100. On March 6, 2012, in coded language during a telephone
call, defendant CHAVEZ asked defendant CHAVEZ JR. if defendant
CHAVEZ JR. had the money to pay defendant CHAVEZ for the
approximately one ounce of methamphetamine that defendant CHAVEZ
had provided to defendant CHAVEZ Jr. on March 3, 2012.
101. On March 7, 2012, in coded language during a telephone
call, defendant CHAVEZ JR. agreed to sell approximately
one-quarter pound of methamphetamine to the CI for $3,000.
102. On March 7, 2012, in coded language during a telephone
20
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
call, defendant CHAVEZ JR. told defendant ALCAZAR that he needed
approximately one-quarter pound of methamphetamine and defendant
ALCAZAR agreed to provide it.
103. On March 7, 2012, defendant ALCAZAR distributed
approximately one-quarter pound of methamphetamine to defendant
CHAVEZ JR.
104. On March 7, 2012, defendant CHAVEZ JR. sold
approximately 125.7 grams of a mixture or substance containing a
detectable amount of methamphetamine (containing approximately
123.7 grams of actual methamphetamine) to the CI in exchange for
$3,000.
105. On March 7, 2012, in coded language during a telephone
call, defendant RUELAS asked to purchase approximately two ounces
of methamphetamine from defendant CHAVEZ JR. for an unidentified
customer.
106. On March 7, 2012, in coded language during a telephone
call, defendant ROBLES ordered approximately one-quarter pound of
methamphetamine from defendant CHAVEZ JR. and asked defendant
CHAVEZ JR. to “pick some nice ones” (good quality
methamphetamine).
107. On March 7, 2012, in coded language during a telephone
call, defendant CHAVEZ JR. advised defendant ALCAZAR that he
needed approximately one-quarter pound of methamphetamine to sell
to defendant ROBLES and asked defendant ALCAZAR to make sure the
quality of the methamphetamine was “good” because defendant
ROBLES was “picky.”
108. On March 7, 2012, defendant ALCAZAR distributed
approximately six ounces of methamphetamine to defendant CHAVEZ
21
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
JR.
109. On March 7, 2012, defendant CHAVEZ JR. sold
approximately one-quarter pound of methamphetamine to defendant
ROBLES for redistribution by defendant ROBLES.
110. On March 8, 2012, in coded language during a telephone
call, defendant CHAVEZ JR. asked defendant RUELAS if defendant
RUELAS still needed approximately two ounces of methamphetamine
to sell to a customer, and defendant RUELAS agreed to meet with
defendant CHAVEZ JR. to pick up the methamphetamine.
111. On March 8, 2012, in coded language during telephone
calls, defendant CHAVEZ JR. offered to introduce defendant RUELAS
to defendant ALCAZAR for future purchases of methamphetamine and
advised that defendant ALCAZAR could sell one-quarter pound
quantities of methamphetamine for approximately $2,200.
112. On March 8, 2012, in coded language during a telephone
call, defendant ZARAGOZA complained to defendant CHAVEZ JR. about
the quality of methamphetamine that defendant CHAVEZ JR. had
previously distributed to defendant ZARAGOZA.
113. On March 9, 2012, in coded language during a telephone
call, defendant CHAVEZ JR. arranged to meet with defendant
ZARAGOZA to provide defendant ZARAGOZA with methamphetamine and
described the methamphetamine as “bigger pieces” and “white”.
114. On March 9, 2012, in coded language during a telephone
call, defendant ZARAGOZA agreed to inspect the quality of the
methamphetamine that defendant CHAVEZ JR. was offering to provide
to him.
115. On March 15, 2012, in coded language during a telephone
call, defendant ROBLES asked to purchase approximately
22
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
one-quarter pound of methamphetamine from defendant CHAVEZ JR.
116. On March 15, 2012, in coded language during telephone
calls, defendant CHAVEZ JR. arranged to purchase approximately
one-quarter pound of methamphetamine from defendant ALCAZAR to
sell to defendant ROBLES.
117. On March 15, 2012, in coded language during telephone
calls, defendant ALCAZAR agreed to sell one-quarter pound of
methamphetamine to defendant CHAVEZ JR. and advised defendant
CHAVEZ JR. that defendant ALCAZAR would leave the methamphetamine
at a location on State Street in Montclair, California, for pick
up by defendant CHAVEZ JR.
118. On March 15, 2012, defendant CHAVEZ JR. sold
approximately one-quarter pound of methamphetamine to defendant
ROBLES for redistribution by defendant ROBLES.
119. On March 15, 2012, in coded language during a telephone
call, defendant CHAVEZ JR. arranged to take defendant ROBLES’
payment for the one-quarter pound of methamphetamine to defendant
ALCAZAR.
120. On March 16, 2012, in coded language during a telephone
call, defendant D. YEPEZ asked to purchase approximately one-half
ounce of methamphetamine from defendant CHAVEZ JR.
121. On March 16, 2012, defendant CHAVEZ JR. sold
approximately one-half ounce of methamphetamine to defendant D.
YEPEZ, for redistribution by D. YEPEZ.
122. On March 16, 2012, in coded language during a telephone
call, defendant LUPIAN asked defendant CHAVEZ if defendant CHAVEZ
would “front” defendant LUPIAN approximately one pound of
methamphetamine.
23
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
123. On March 17, 2012, in coded language during a series of
consecutive telephone calls, defendants ALCAZAR, ARMA, and
ESPINOSA arranged the transfer of drug proceeds from the Central
District of California to Mexico.
124. On March 17, 2012, in coded language during telephone
calls, defendant LUPIAN arranged to sell approximately two ounces
of methamphetamine to an unindicted co-conspirator.
125. On March 18, 2012, in coded language during telephone
calls, defendant ESPINOSA arranged for defendant ALCAZAR to sell
approximately one-quarter pound of methamphetamine to an
unindicted co-conspirator for $1,000 with the remainder of the
amount due to be paid later.
126. On March 18, 2012, defendant ALCAZAR sold approximately
one-quarter pound of methamphetamine to the unindicted
co-conspirator and accepted $1,000 as partial payment for the
methamphetamine
127. On March 18, 2012, in coded language during a telephone
call, defendant CHAVEZ complained to defendant LUPIAN about the
quality of one of the four one-quarter pound quantities of
methamphetamine that defendant LUPIAN had distributed to
defendant CHAVEZ.
128. On March 18, 2012, in coded language during a telephone
call, defendant LUPIAN directed defendant CHAVEZ to return the
one-quarter pound of poor quality methamphetamine to defendant
LUPIAN and to keep the other three-quarter pounds of good quality
methamphetamine.
129. On March 19, 2012, defendant ESPINOSA accepted
approximately $800 from an unindicted co-conspirator as
24
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
additional payment for the approximately one-quarter pound of
methamphetamine that defendant ALCAZAR sold to the unindicted co-
conspirator on March 18, 2012.
130. On March 19, 2012, in coded language during a telephone
call, defendant BORRACHIN asked to purchase methamphetamine from
defendant ALCAZAR and specified that he wanted “bigger rocks” and
for defendant ALCAZAR to “handpick” the methamphetamine to ensure
defendant BORRACHIN was receiving good quality methamphetamine.
131. On March 19, 2012, defendant CHAVEZ returned
approximately one-quarter pound of poor quality methamphetamine
to defendant LUPIAN.
132. On March 20, 2012, in coded language during telephone
calls, defendant BORRACHIN asked defendant ALCAZAR if defendant
BORRACHIN could get “more donuts” (pounds of methamphetamine) for
an unidentified customer and advised that the customer wanted
“bigger” pieces.
133. On March 20, 2012, defendant ALCAZAR distributed
approximately two pounds of methamphetamine to defendant
BORRACHIN at a residence in Baldwin Park, California, for
redistribution by defendant BORRACHIN.
134. On March 20, 2012, in coded language during telephone
calls, defendant A. YEPEZ asked to purchase approximately
one-half ounce of methamphetamine from defendant CHAVEZ JR. to
sell to a waiting unidentified customer.
135. On March 20, 2012, defendant CHAVEZ JR. met with
defendant A. YEPEZ and the unidentified customer and distributed
one-half ounce of methamphetamine to the customer.
136. On March 20, 2012, in coded language during telephone
25
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
calls, defendants CHAVEZ JR. and A. YEPEZ discussed how much
defendant A. YEPEZ’ customer had paid for the one-half ounce of
methamphetamine, which of defendant CHAVEZ JR.’s phone numbers to
give to the customer, and the fact that the customer had his own
customers waiting to buy methamphetamine.
137. On March 20, 2012, in coded language during a telephone
call, defendant CERVANTES asked defendant LUPIAN how much two
pounds of methamphetamine would cost.
138. On March 20, 2012, in coded language during a telephone
call, defendant LUPIAN told defendant CERVANTES that two pounds
of methamphetamine would cost $9,800 or $9,600 per pound.
139. On March 20, 2012, in coded language during telephone
calls, defendant CERVANTES advised defendant LUPIAN that
defendant CERVANTES had customers who wanted to buy two pounds of
methamphetamine and who wanted to know if $19,200 was the
cheapest price for the two pounds of methamphetamine.
140. On March 20, 2012, defendant LUPIAN picked up two
pounds of methamphetamine from an unindicted co-conspirator.
141. On March 20, 2012, defendant LUPIAN distributed
approximately two-pounds of methamphetamine to defendant
CERVANTES so that defendant CERVANTES could sell it to his
customers.
142. On March 20, 2012, in coded language during a telephone
call, defendant CERVANTES told defendant LUPIAN that defendant
CERVANTES’ customers were unhappy with the quality of the two
pounds of methamphetamine provided by defendant LUPIAN and had
returned to Arizona without buying them.
143. On March 20, 2012, in coded language during telephone
26
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
calls, defendant LUPIAN told defendant CERVANTES that he would
take back the two pounds of methamphetamine.
144. On March 21, 2012, in coded language during a telephone
call, defendant LUPIAN told the unindicted co-conspirator that
defendant LUPIAN would be returning the two pounds of
methamphetamine so that the unindicted co-conspirator could “fix
the truck” (improve the quality of the methamphetamine).
145. On March 21, 2012, in coded language during a telephone
call, defendants ALCAZAR and ARMA arranged for the transfer of
approximately $12,013 of drug proceeds from the Central District
of California to Mexico.
146. On March 21, 2012, in coded language during telephone
calls, defendant PETE ordered approximately three ounces of
methamphetamine from defendant CHAVEZ JR. and told defendant
CHAVEZ JR. that he had the money to pay for the methamphetamine.
147. On March 21, 2012, defendant CHAVEZ JR. sold
approximately three ounces of methamphetamine to defendant PETE
for redistribution by defendant PETE.
148. On March 22, 2012, in coded language during telephone
calls, defendant ZARAGOZA asked to purchase approximately
one-quarter ounce of methamphetamine from defendant CHAVEZ JR.
and offered to pay defendant CHAVEZ JR. for a previous one-
quarter ounce of methamphetamine defendant CHAVEZ JR. had
supplied to him.
149. On March 22, 2012, defendant CHAVEZ JR. sold
approximately one-quarter ounce of methamphetamine to defendant
ZARAGOZA for redistribution by defendant ZARAGOZA.
150. On March 22, 2012, in coded language during a telephone
27
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
call, defendant ZARAGOZA asked defendant CHAVEZ JR. if the
methamphetamine that defendant CHAVEZ JR. sold to defendant
ZARAGOZA on March 22, 2012, was of the same quality as
methamphetamine defendant CHAVEZ JR. previously sold to defendant
ZARAGOZA because it smelled different.
151. On March 22, 2012, in coded language during a telephone
call, defendant JOYA advised defendant ALCAZAR that a customer
had returned one pound of methamphetamine, defendant JOYA had
exchanged the returned methamphetamine with another pound of
methamphetamine, and defendant JOYA currently possessed two
pounds of methamphetamine.
152. On March 22, 2012, in coded language during a telephone
call, defendants ALCAZAR and ESPINOSA arranged to sell
approximately six ounces of methamphetamine to defendant
BORRACHIN.
153. On March 23, 2012, in coded language during telephone
calls, defendants ALCAZAR and ARMA arranged for the transfer of
$12,583 of drug proceeds from the Central District of California
to Mexico.
154. On March 23, 2012, defendant RUELAS paid approximately
$1,000 in drug proceeds to defendant ZEPEDA for delivery to
defendant ALCAZAR.
155. On March 24, 2012, in coded language during telephone
calls, defendant LUPIAN asked defendant TONY if he had
approximately two pounds of methamphetamine for sale.
156. On March 24, 2012, defendant TONY sold approximately
two pounds of methamphetamine to defendant LUPIAN at a location
on State Street in Montclair, California, for redistribution by
28
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
defendant LUPIAN.
157. On March 26, 2012, in coded language during a telephone
call, defendant ZARAGOZA asked to purchase approximately one-
quarter ounce of methamphetamine from defendant CHAVEZ JR.
158. On March 27, 2012, in coded language during a telephone
call, defendant BARRON informed defendant ALCAZAR that defendant
BARRON would be sending five kilograms of methamphetamine from
Mexico to the Central District of California and instructed
defendant ALCAZAR not to purchase any other methamphetamine.
159. On March 27, 2012, in coded language during a telephone
call, defendant ALCAZAR told defendant BARRON that defendant
ALCAZAR had one-half kilogram of methamphetamine left to sell and
asked defendant BARRON to select good quality methamphetamine for
transport because the quality of the prior methamphetamine that
had been provided had caused their customers to complain.
160. On March 27, 2012, in coded language during a telephone
call, defendants BARRON and ALCAZAR discussed how much in drug
proceeds to leave in the United States to pay expenses and how
much in drug proceeds to send to Mexico for investment in Mexican
real estate.
161. On March 28, 2012, in coded language during a telephone
call, defendant CHAVEZ JR. agreed to sell approximately one-half
pound of methamphetamine to the CI.
162. On March 28, 2012, in coded language during a telephone
call, defendant CHAVEZ JR. arranged to purchase approximately
one-half pound of methamphetamine from defendant ALCAZAR.
163. On March 28, 2012, in coded language during a telephone
call, defendant ALCAZAR instructed defendant CHAVEZ JR. to pick
29
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
up the approximately one-half pound of methamphetamine from
defendant ZARATE at the Nocta Street Stash House.
164. On March 28, 2012, defendant CHAVEZ JR. sold
approximately 222.3 grams of a mixture or substance containing a
detectable amount of methamphetamine (containing approximately
221.6 grams of actual methamphetamine) to the CI in exchange for
$5,000.
165. On March 28, 2012, defendant CHAVEZ JR. delivered
payment for the methamphetamine purchased by the CI to defendant
ALCAZAR.
166. On March 28, 2012, in coded language during telephone
calls, defendant CHAVEZ told defendant LUPIAN that he had money
and was on his way over to defendant LUPIAN’s ranch in Ontario,
California.
167. On March 28, 2012, in coded language during telephone
calls, defendant CHAVEZ told defendant CHAVEZ JR. that he was
picking up two ounces of methamphetamine from defendant LUPIAN
and asked if defendant CHAVEZ JR. wanted any methamphetamine.
168. On March 28, 2012, defendant LUPIAN distributed
approximately 111.5 grams of a mixture or substance containing a
detectable amount of methamphetamine (containing approximately
110.3 grams of actual methamphetamine) to defendant CHAVEZ for
redistribution by defendant CHAVEZ.
169. On March 28, 2012, defendant CHAVEZ possessed with
intent to distribute approximately 111.5 grams of a mixture or
substance containing a detectable amount of methamphetamine
(containing approximately 110.3 grams of actual methamphetamine)
in his car in Ontario, California.
30
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
170. On April 2, 2012, in coded language during a telephone
call and text messages, defendant LUPIAN agreed to sell
approximately one ounce of methamphetamine to an unknown customer
for $600.
171. On April 4, 2012, in coded language during telephone
calls, defendant PETE ordered approximately one ounce of
methamphetamine from defendant CHAVEZ JR. for an unidentified
female customer, but asked defendant CHAVEZ JR. to bring a
different kind because the methamphetamine defendant CHAVEZ JR.
had previously provided “tasted like detergent.”
172. On April 4, 2012, in coded language during telephone
calls, defendant CHAVEZ JR. told defendant PETE that he would
exchange the methamphetamine that “tasted like detergent” for
different methamphetamine.
173. On April 4, 2012, defendant CHAVEZ JR. distributed
approximately one ounce of methamphetamine to defendant PETE for
sale to an unidentified female customer.
174. On April 4, 2012, defendant PETE sold approximately
one-half ounce of methamphetamine to an unidentified female
customer.
175. On April 25, 2012, defendant ZARATE manufactured
methamphetamine.
176. On April 25, 2012, in coded language during a telephone
call, defendant BARRON checked on the quality of the
methamphetamine that defendant ZARATE had manufactured and
defendant ZARATE advised defendant BARRON that most of the
methamphetamine came out in large chunks.
177. On April 26, 2012, defendants REYES and ZARATE obtained
31
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
acetone for the production of methamphetamine.
178. On April 27, 2012, in coded language during a telephone
call, defendant ALCAZAR directed defendant ZARATE to take the
methamphetamine out of the acetone.
179. On April 27, 2012, in coded language during a telephone
call, defendant BARRON directed defendant ZARATE to set aside
approximately one pound of methamphetamine for defendant BARRON.
180. On April 27, 2012, defendant ZARATE manufactured
methamphetamine at the Nocta Street Stash House.
181. On May 2, 2012, in coded language during telephone
calls, defendant ALCAZAR directed defendant ZARATE to drain the
methamphetamine that defendant ZARATE was manufacturing at the
Nocta Street Stash House.
182. On May 5, 2012, defendant ZARATE manufactured
approximately one pound of methamphetamine at the Nocta Street
Stash House.
183. On May 6, 2012, in coded language during a telephone
call, defendant ALCAZAR directed defendant ZARATE to give
approximately one ounce of the methamphetamine defendant ZARATE
had just manufactured to a customer known as “Michael.”
184. On May 6, 2012, defendant ZARATE distributed
approximately one ounce of methamphetamine to the customer known
as “Michael.”
185. On May 7, 2012, in coded language during a telephone
call, defendant ALCAZAR inquired with defendant ZARATE about the
manufacturing of methamphetamine and directed defendant ZARATE to
put aside approximately two ounces of methamphetamine for
defendant ALCAZAR.
32
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
186. On May 7, 2012, defendant ZARATE manufactured
methamphetamine at the Nocta Street Stash House.
187. On May 7, 2012, defendant ZARATE distributed
approximately two ounces of methamphetamine to defendant ALCAZAR.
188. On May 8, 2012, in coded language during a telephone
call, defendant ALCAZAR directed defendant ZARATE to put aside
approximately six ounces of methamphetamine for defendant ZEPEDA.
189. On May 8, 2012, defendant ZARATE distributed
approximately six ounces of methamphetamine to defendant ZEPEDA
for redistribution by defendant ZEPEDA.
190. On May 14, 2012, in coded language during a telephone
call, defendant ALCAZAR directed defendant ZARATE to pull out
approximately one ounce of methamphetamine for him.
191. On May 14, 2012, defendant ZARATE distributed
approximately one ounce of methamphetamine to defendant ALCAZAR
for redistribution by defendant ALCAZAR.
192. On May 15, 2012, in coded language during a telephone
call, defendant ALCAZAR directed defendant ZARATE to bring
approximately one pound of methamphetamine to 285 West Center
Street in Pomona, California.
193. On May 20, 2012, in coded language during a telephone
call, defendant ESPINOSA asked defendant ZARATE to bring
approximately one pound of methamphetamine to 285 West Center
Street in Pomona, California, for a waiting customer.
194. On May 20, 2012, in coded language during a telephone
call, defendant ZARATE told defendant ESPINOSA that he only had
approximately one-half pound of methamphetamine.
195. On May 20, 2012, in coded language during a telephone
33
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
call, defendant ESPINOSA agreed to take the one-half pound of
methamphetamine from defendant ZARATE and directed defendant
ZARATE to bring the methamphetamine to him.
196. On May 30, 2012, defendant REYES delivered liquid
methamphetamine to the Nocta Street stash house.
197. On May 30, 2012, in coded language during a telephone
call, defendant ALCAZAR directed defendants REYES and ZARATE to
wait for defendant CHAVEZ JR. before converting the liquid
methamphetamine into crystallized methamphetamine.
198. On May 30, 2012, defendants REYES and CHAVEZ JR.
carried the liquid methamphetamine from defendant REYES’ car into
the Nocta Street Stash House.
199. On May 30, 3012, defendants REYES, ZARATE, and CHAVEZ
JR. began converting liquid methamphetamine into crystallized
methamphetamine at the Nocta Street Stash House.
200. On May 31, 2012, in coded language during telephone
calls, defendant ZARATE updated defendant ALCAZAR on the progress
of converting the liquid methamphetamine into crystallized
methamphetamine at the Nocta Street Stash House.
201. On May 31, 2012, in coded language during a telephone
call, defendant CHAVEZ JR. asked defendant ZARATE about the
results of the methamphetamine conversion on May 30, 2012.
202. From June 2, 2012 through June 7, 2012, defendant
ZARATE manufactured methamphetamine at the Nocta Street Stash
House.
203. From June 2, 2012 through June 7, 2012, in coded
language during telephone calls, defendant ALCAZAR directed
defendant ZARATE’s manufacturing of methamphetamine.
34
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
204. On June 7, 2012, in coded language during a telephone
call, defendant ALCAZAR directed defendant ZARATE to put aside
approximately one pound of “pretty” methamphetamine for a
customer named “Reynaldo” and approximately one pound of
methamphetamine for defendant REYES.
35
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
COUNT TWO
[21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(B)(viii)]
On or about April 15, 2011, in Los Angeles County, within
the Central District of California, defendants JOSE MARIA CHAVEZ,
JR., also known as (“aka”) “Jose M. Chavez Valencia,” aka
“Chema,” and RUDY ZEPEDA, aka “Virolo,” aka “Ojon,” knowingly and
intentionally distributed at least five grams, that is,
approximately 26.4 grams, of methamphetamine, a Schedule II
controlled substance.
36
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
COUNT THREE
[21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(B)(viii)]
On or about May 11, 2011, in Los Angeles County, within the
Central District of California, defendant RUDY ZEPEDA, also known
as (“aka”) “Virolo,” aka “Ojon,” knowingly and intentionally
distributed at least five grams, that is, approximately 13.7
grams, of methamphetamine, a Schedule II controlled substance.
37
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
COUNT FOUR
[21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(B)(viii)]
On or about June 3, 2011, in San Bernardino County, within
the Central District of California, defendants DANIEL LUPIAN,
also known as (“aka”) “Yogi,” aka “Nariz du Chupon,” CHRISTOPHER
ALVARADO, and MARCOS OREJEL, aka “Piolin,” knowingly and
intentionally distributed at least five grams, that is,
approximately 12.3 grams, of methamphetamine, a Schedule II
controlled substance.
38
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
COUNT FIVE
[21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(B)(viii)]
On or about July 7, 2011, in Los Angeles County, within the
Central District of California, defendant MARCOS OREJEL, also
known as “Piolin,” knowingly and intentionally distributed at
least five grams, that is, approximately 27.2 grams, of
methamphetamine, a Schedule II controlled substance.
39
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
COUNT SIX
[21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(B)(viii)]
On or about July 13, 2011, in Los Angeles County, within the
Central District of California, defendant JOSE ALVARADO knowingly
and intentionally distributed at least five grams, that is,
approximately 26.6 grams, of methamphetamine, a Schedule II
controlled substance.
40
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
COUNT SEVEN
[21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(B)(viii)]
On or about July 21, 2011, in Los Angeles County, within the
Central District of California, defendant MARCOS OREJEL, also
known as “Piolin,” knowingly and intentionally distributed at
least five grams, that is, approximately 40.6 grams, of
methamphetamine, a Schedule II controlled substance.
41
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
COUNT EIGHT
21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(B)(viii)]
On or about July 28, 2011, in Los Angeles County, within the
Central District of California, defendants JOSE MARIA CHAVEZ,
JR., also known as (“aka”) “Jose M. Chavez Valencia,” aka
“Chema,” and RUDY ZEPEDA, aka “Virolo,” aka “Ojon,” knowingly and
intentionally distributed at least five grams, that is,
approximately 13.7 grams, of methamphetamine, a Schedule II
controlled substance.
42
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
COUNT NINE
[21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(B)(viii)]
On or about August 19, 2011, in Los Angeles County, within
the Central District of California, defendant JOSE MARIA CHAVEZ,
JR., also known as (“aka”) “Jose M. Chavez Valencia,” aka
“Chema,” knowingly and intentionally distributed at least five
grams, that is, approximately 46.8 grams, of methamphetamine, a
Schedule II controlled substance.
43
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
COUNT TEN
[21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(C)]
On or about September 1, 2011, in Los Angeles County, within
the Central District of California, defendant JOSE ALVARADO
knowingly and intentionally distributed approximately 4.5 grams
of methamphetamine, a Schedule II controlled substance.
44
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
COUNT ELEVEN
[21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(B)(viii)]
On or about September 14, 2011, in Los Angeles County,
within the Central District of California, defendant RUDY ZEPEDA,
also known as (“aka”) “Virolo,” aka “Ojon,” knowingly and
intentionally distributed at least five grams, that is,
approximately 23.9 grams, of methamphetamine, a Schedule II
controlled substance.
45
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
COUNT TWELVE
[21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(B)(viii)]
On or about September 22, 2011, in Los Angeles County,
within the Central District of California, defendant JOSE MARIA
CHAVEZ, JR., also known as (“aka”) “Jose M. Chavez Valencia,” aka
“Chema,” knowingly and intentionally distributed at least five
grams, that is, approximately 35.4 grams, of methamphetamine, a
Schedule II controlled substance.
46
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
COUNT THIRTEEN
[21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(B)(viii)]
On or about September 28, 2011, in Los Angeles County,
within the Central District of California, defendant JOSE MARIA
CHAVEZ, JR., also known as (“aka”) “Jose M. Chavez Valencia,” aka
“Chema,” knowingly and intentionally distributed at least five
grams, that is, approximately 23.5 grams, of methamphetamine, a
Schedule II controlled substance.
47
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
COUNT FOURTEEN
[21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(B)(viii)]
On or about October 7, 2011, in Los Angeles County, within
the Central District of California, defendant JOSE MARIA CHAVEZ,
JR., also known as (“aka”) “Jose M. Chavez Valencia,” aka
“Chema,” knowingly and intentionally distributed at least five
grams, that is, approximately 48.2 grams, of methamphetamine, a
Schedule II controlled substance.
48
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
COUNT FIFTEEN
[21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(B)(viii)]
On or about October 19, 2011, in Los Angeles County, within
the Central District of California, defendant JOSE MARIA CHAVEZ,
JR., also known as (“aka”) “Jose M. Chavez Valencia,” aka
“Chema,” knowingly and intentionally distributed at least five
grams, that is, approximately 25.5 grams, of methamphetamine, a
Schedule II controlled substance.
49
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
COUNT SIXTEEN
[21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(B)(viii)]
On or about October 28, 2011, in Los Angeles County, within
the Central District of California, defendant JOSE MARIA CHAVEZ,
JR., also known as (“aka”) “Jose M. Chavez Valencia,” aka
“Chema,” knowingly and intentionally distributed at least five
grams, that is, approximately 51.6 grams, of methamphetamine, a
Schedule II controlled substance.
50
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
COUNT SEVENTEEN
[21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(B)(viii)]
On or about November 10, 2011, in Los Angeles County, within
the Central District of California, defendant JOSE MARIA CHAVEZ,
JR., also known as (“aka”) “Jose M. Chavez Valencia,” aka
“Chema,” knowingly and intentionally distributed at least five
grams, that is, approximately 16.5 grams, of methamphetamine, a
Schedule II controlled substance.
51
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
COUNT EIGHTEEN
[21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(A)(viii)]
On or about December 1, 2011, in Los Angeles County, within
the Central District of California, defendant JOSE MARIA CHAVEZ,
JR., also known as (“aka”) “Jose M. Chavez Valencia,” aka
“Chema,” knowingly and intentionally distributed at least fifty
grams, that is, approximately 81.8 grams, of methamphetamine, a
Schedule II controlled substance.
52
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
COUNT NINETEEN
[21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(A)(viii)]
On or about December 16, 2011, in Los Angeles County, within
the Central District of California, defendant JOSE MARIA CHAVEZ,
JR., also known as (“aka”) “Jose M. Chavez Valencia,” aka
“Chema,” knowingly and intentionally distributed at least fifty
grams, that is, approximately 111.1 grams, of methamphetamine, a
Schedule II controlled substance.
53
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
COUNT TWENTY
[21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(A)(viii)]
On or about December 21, 2011, in Los Angeles County, within
the Central District of California, defendant JOSE MARIA CHAVEZ,
JR., also known as (“aka”) “Jose M. Chavez Valencia,” aka
“Chema,” knowingly and intentionally distributed at least fifty
grams, that is, approximately 61.9 grams, of methamphetamine, a
Schedule II controlled substance.
54
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
COUNT TWENTY-ONE
[21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(A)(viii)]
On or about January 6, 2012, in Los Angeles County, within
the Central District of California, defendant JOSE MARIA CHAVEZ,
JR., also known as (“aka”) “Jose M. Chavez Valencia,” aka
“Chema,” knowingly and intentionally distributed at least fifty
grams, that is, approximately 110.4 grams, of methamphetamine, a
Schedule II controlled substance.
55
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
COUNT TWENTY-TWO
[21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(A)(viii)]
On or about January 25, 2012, in Los Angeles County, within
the Central District of California, defendant JOSE MARIA CHAVEZ,
JR., also known as (“aka”) “Jose M. Chavez Valencia,” aka
“Chema,” knowingly and intentionally distributed at least fifty
grams, that is, approximately 110.1 grams, of methamphetamine, a
Schedule II controlled substance.
56
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
COUNT TWENTY-THREE
[21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(A)(viii)]
On or about February 6, 2012, in Los Angeles County, within
the Central District of California, defendant JOSE MARIA CHAVEZ,
JR., also known as (“aka”) “Jose M. Chavez Valencia,” aka
“Chema,” knowingly and intentionally distributed at least fifty
grams, that is, approximately 62.0 grams, of methamphetamine, a
Schedule II controlled substance.
57
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
COUNT TWENTY-FOUR
[21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(A)(viii)]
On or about February 21, 2012, in Los Angeles County, within
the Central District of California, defendants MARTIN BARRON
ALCAZAR, also known as (“aka”) “Quiniki,” aka “Quini,” aka
“Martin Garcia Barron,” and JOSE MARIA CHAVEZ, JR., aka “Jose M.
Chavez Valencia,” aka “Chema,” knowingly and intentionally
distributed at least fifty grams, that is, approximately 124.7
grams, of methamphetamine, a Schedule II controlled substance.
58
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
COUNT TWENTY-FIVE
[21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(A)(viii)]
On or about March 7, 2012, in Los Angeles County, within the
Central District of California, defendants MARTIN BARRON ALCAZAR,
also known as (“aka”) “Quiniki,” aka “Quini,” aka “Martin Garcia
Barron,” and JOSE MARIA CHAVEZ, JR., aka “Jose M. Chavez-
Valencia,” aka “Chema,” knowingly and intentionally distributed
at least fifty grams, that is, approximately 123.7 grams, of
methamphetamine, a Schedule II controlled substance.
59
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
COUNT TWENTY-SIX
[21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(A)(viii)]
On or about March 28, 2012, in Los Angeles County, within
the Central District of California, defendants MARTIN BARRON
ALCAZAR, also known as (“aka”) “Quiniki,” aka “Quini,” aka
“Martin Garcia Barron,” JORGE LUIS BARRON ZARATE, aka “Qoi,” aka
“Coyote,” and JOSE MARIA CHAVEZ, JR., aka “Jose M. Chavez
Valencia,” aka “Chema,” knowingly and intentionally distributed
at least fifty grams, that is, approximately 221.6 grams, of
methamphetamine, a Schedule II controlled substance.
60
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
COUNT TWENTY-SEVEN
[21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(A)(viii)]
On or about March 28, 2012, in San Bernardino County, within
the Central District of California, defendant DANIEL LUPIAN, also
known as (“aka”) “Yogi,” aka “Nariz du Chupon,” knowingly and
intentionally distributed at least fifty grams, that is,
approximately 110.3 grams, of methamphetamine, a Schedule II
controlled substance.
61
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
COUNT TWENTY-EIGHT
[21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(A)(viii)]
On or about March 28, 2012, in San Bernardino and Los
Angeles Counties, within the Central District of California,
defendant JOSE MARIA CHAVEZ, also known as “Chemita,” knowingly
and intentionally possessed with intent to distribute at least
fifty grams, that is, approximately 110.3 grams, of
methamphetamine, a Schedule II controlled substance.
62
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
COUNT TWENTY-NINE
[21 U.S.C. § 856(a)(1)]
Beginning on a date unknown, and continuing until at least
on or about June 7, 2012, in Los Angeles County, within the
Central District of California, defendants JOSE JUAN GARCIA
BARRON, also known as (“aka”) “Tokes,” MARTIN BARRON ALCAZAR, aka
“Quiniki,” aka “Quini,” aka “Martin Garcia Barron,” ENRIQUE
CENTENO REYES, aka “Gordo,” aka “Gordito,” and JORGE LUIS BARRON
ZARATE, aka “Qoi,” aka “Coyote,” knowingly opened, leased,
rented, used, and maintained a place, permanently and
temporarily, to wit, the residence at 952 Nocta Street in Pomona,
California, for the purpose of manufacturing, distributing, and
using methamphetamine, a Schedule II controlled substance.
A TRUE BILL
Foreperson
ANDRÉ BIROTTE JR. United States Attorney
ROBERT E. DUGDALEAssistant United States AttorneyChief, Criminal Division
ELIZABETH R. YANGAssistant United States AttorneyChief, Violent & Organized Crime Section
JOEY L. BLANCHAssistant United States AttorneyDeputy Chief, Violent & Organized Crime Section
SHAWN J. NELSONAssistant United States AttorneysViolent & Organized Crime Section
63