polylysine as a vehicle for extracellular...

7
Polylysine as a Vehicle for Extracellular Matrix–Targeted Local Drug Delivery, Providing High Accumulation and Long-Term Retention Within the Vascular Wall D.V. Sakharov, A.F.H. Jie, M.E.A. Bekkers, J.J. Emeis, D.C. Rijken Abstract—We present the first steps in the elaboration of an approach of extracellular matrix–targeted local drug delivery (ECM-LDD), designed to provide a high concentration, ubiquitous distribution, and long-term retention of a drug within the vessel wall after local intravascular delivery. The approach is based on the concept of a bifunctional drug comprising a “therapeutic effector” and an “affinity vehicle,” which should bind to an abundant component of the vessel wall. The aim of the present study was to select molecules suitable for the role of affinity vehicles for ECM-LDD and to study their intravascular delivery and retention ex vivo and in an animal model. By use of fluorescence microscopy, the following molecules were selected on the basis of strong binding to cross sections of human vessels: protamine, polylysine, polyarginine, a glycosaminoglycan-binding peptide from vitronectin, and a synthetic dendrimer. With polylysine as a prototypic affinity vehicle, we showed that after intravascular delivery, polylysine was concentrated throughout a luminal layer of the vascular wall to an extremely high concentration of 20 g/L and was retained therein for at least 72 hours of perfusion without noticeable losses. Low molecular weight (fluorescein) and high molecular weight (hirudin) compounds could be chemically conjugated to polylysine and were retained in the vessel wall after intravascular delivery of the conjugates. In conclusion, by use of the ECM-LDD method, an extremely high concentration and long-term retention of locally delivered drug can be reached. Polycationic molecules can be considered as potential affinity vehicles for ECM-LDD. (Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2001;21:943-948.) Key Words: local drug delivery n restenosis n polylysine n hirudin n extracellular matrix L ocal drug delivery (LDD) is a useful approach for treating many localized pathologies. The concentration of systemically administered drugs is often limited by side effects of the drug. With LDD, a much higher local concen- tration of a drug in the site of pathology can be achieved. Treatment/prevention of restenosis after coronary angioplasty is currently one of the most tantalizing targets for intravas- cular LDD. A number of sophisticated catheter-based devices have been developed to maximize the efficiency of intravas- cular LDD; some of these devices do not obstruct the blood flow and, therefore, allow prolonged local delivery. 1 The major problem of the intravascular drug delivery is that after being delivered to the site of pathology, the drug may be washed out from the site of delivery rather rapidly, over minutes to hours. 1,2 Even if the drug interacts with the cells within the vascular wall, only a small fraction of the locally delivered drug would be caught up by the cells; the rest would be rapidly washed away. The fraction of the drug taken up by the cells may be either internalized or shed from the cellular membrane within hours or, at most, days. It would be desirable to keep a drug at the site of potential restenosis for a longer period of time, because restenosis is a long process, the initial phase of which takes a few weeks, and final changes develop after a few months. 1,3 Incorporation of the drug into microparticles or hydrogels with slow (controlled) drug release is suggested as an approach for prolonging drug retention. However, the vessel wall appears to be an anatomic barrier to microparticle delivery; the particles penetrate poorly into the vascular wall and are found mostly in the vasa vasorum and dissections within the intima after angioplasty. 4 A variant of controlled drug release is endoluminal paving with a drug-containing hydrogel. 5 In this technique, the storage of the drug (hydrogel coating) is also located next to the target tissue but is not in it; thus, the drug, after being released from the hydrogel compartment, must penetrate the neighboring vascular tissue. Simulations show that this technique prolongs the intravas- cular presence of the drugs from minutes to hours, but not longer. 6 Besides LDD, another alternative to systemic drug treat- ment is cell-targeted drug delivery. In this approach, focused mostly on the treatment of cancer, 7 a systemically adminis- tered drug, endowed with an affinity to a pathology-specific epitope exposed on the cells, is supposed to find the site of Received December 27, 2000; revision accepted February 1, 2001. From the Gaubius Laboratory (D.V.S., A.F.H.J., M.E.A.B., J.J.E., D.C.R.), TNO Prevention and Health, Leiden, and the Institute for Cardiovascular Research (D.V.S.), Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Correspondence to Dr D.V. Sakharov, Gaubius Laboratory, TNO Prevention and Health, PO Box 2215, 2301 CE Leiden, Netherlands. E-mail [email protected] or [email protected] © 2001 American Heart Association, Inc. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. is available at http://www.atvbaha.org 943 by guest on May 23, 2018 http://atvb.ahajournals.org/ Downloaded from

Upload: letuyen

Post on 26-Mar-2018

221 views

Category:

Documents


3 download

TRANSCRIPT

Polylysine as a Vehicle for Extracellular Matrix–TargetedLocal Drug Delivery, Providing High Accumulation and

Long-Term Retention Within the Vascular WallD.V. Sakharov, A.F.H. Jie, M.E.A. Bekkers, J.J. Emeis, D.C. Rijken

Abstract—We present the first steps in the elaboration of an approach of extracellular matrix–targeted local drug delivery(ECM-LDD), designed to provide a high concentration, ubiquitous distribution, and long-term retention of a drug withinthe vessel wall after local intravascular delivery. The approach is based on the concept of a bifunctional drug comprisinga “therapeutic effector” and an “affinity vehicle,” which should bind to an abundant component of the vessel wall. Theaim of the present study was to select molecules suitable for the role of affinity vehicles for ECM-LDD and to studytheir intravascular delivery and retention ex vivo and in an animal model. By use of fluorescence microscopy, thefollowing molecules were selected on the basis of strong binding to cross sections of human vessels: protamine,polylysine, polyarginine, a glycosaminoglycan-binding peptide from vitronectin, and a synthetic dendrimer. Withpolylysine as a prototypic affinity vehicle, we showed that after intravascular delivery, polylysine was concentratedthroughout a luminal layer of the vascular wall to an extremely high concentration of 20 g/L and was retained thereinfor at least 72 hours of perfusion without noticeable losses. Low molecular weight (fluorescein) and high molecularweight (hirudin) compounds could be chemically conjugated to polylysine and were retained in the vessel wall afterintravascular delivery of the conjugates. In conclusion, by use of the ECM-LDD method, an extremely highconcentration and long-term retention of locally delivered drug can be reached. Polycationic molecules can beconsidered as potential affinity vehicles for ECM-LDD.(Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2001;21:943-948.)

Key Words: local drug deliveryn restenosisn polylysine n hirudin n extracellular matrix

L ocal drug delivery (LDD) is a useful approach fortreating many localized pathologies. The concentration

of systemically administered drugs is often limited by sideeffects of the drug. With LDD, a much higher local concen-tration of a drug in the site of pathology can be achieved.Treatment/prevention of restenosis after coronary angioplastyis currently one of the most tantalizing targets for intravas-cular LDD. A number of sophisticated catheter-based deviceshave been developed to maximize the efficiency of intravas-cular LDD; some of these devices do not obstruct the bloodflow and, therefore, allow prolonged local delivery.1 Themajor problem of the intravascular drug delivery is that afterbeing delivered to the site of pathology, the drug may bewashed out from the site of delivery rather rapidly, overminutes to hours.1,2 Even if the drug interacts with the cellswithin the vascular wall, only a small fraction of the locallydelivered drug would be caught up by the cells; the rest wouldbe rapidly washed away. The fraction of the drug taken up bythe cells may be either internalized or shed from the cellularmembrane within hours or, at most, days. It would bedesirable to keep a drug at the site of potential restenosis fora longer period of time, because restenosis is a long process,

the initial phase of which takes a few weeks, and finalchanges develop after a few months.1,3

Incorporation of the drug into microparticles or hydrogelswith slow (controlled) drug release is suggested as anapproach for prolonging drug retention. However, the vesselwall appears to be an anatomic barrier to microparticledelivery; the particles penetrate poorly into the vascular walland are found mostly in the vasa vasorum and dissectionswithin the intima after angioplasty.4 A variant of controlleddrug release is endoluminal paving with a drug-containinghydrogel.5 In this technique, the storage of the drug (hydrogelcoating) is also located next to the target tissue but is not init; thus, the drug, after being released from the hydrogelcompartment, must penetrate the neighboring vascular tissue.Simulations show that this technique prolongs the intravas-cular presence of the drugs from minutes to hours, but notlonger.6

Besides LDD, another alternative to systemic drug treat-ment is cell-targeted drug delivery. In this approach, focusedmostly on the treatment of cancer,7 a systemically adminis-tered drug, endowed with an affinity to a pathology-specificepitope exposed on the cells, is supposed to find the site of

Received December 27, 2000; revision accepted February 1, 2001.From the Gaubius Laboratory (D.V.S., A.F.H.J., M.E.A.B., J.J.E., D.C.R.), TNO Prevention and Health, Leiden, and the Institute for Cardiovascular

Research (D.V.S.), Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.Correspondence to Dr D.V. Sakharov, Gaubius Laboratory, TNO Prevention and Health, PO Box 2215, 2301 CE Leiden, Netherlands. E-mail

[email protected] or [email protected]© 2001 American Heart Association, Inc.

Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol.is available at http://www.atvbaha.org

943

by guest on May 23, 2018

http://atvb.ahajournals.org/D

ownloaded from

pathology and concentrate there as a result of binding to theseepitopes. The approach is most attractive for the cases inwhich the location of pathology is not precisely known andthe local delivery of the drug is not possible. Normally, ahighly specific antibody should be generated to ensure thespecific delivery of the drug to the targeted cell population inthe presence of a great excess of irrelevant tissue epitopes. Noreliable restenosis-specific epitopes have been identified asyet, so nowadays, this approach is not applicable to theprevention/treatment of restenosis.

In the present study, we report a novel approach ofextracellular matrix (ECM)-directed local drug delivery(ECM-LDD), designed to provide a long-term retention of ahighly concentrated drug within the target tissue after localdelivery. The method is based on a concept of local deliveryof a bifunctional drug comprising an anti-restenotic effectormoiety and an “affinity vehicle” moiety capable of anchoringand retaining the drug within the ECM of the vessel wall. Aprincipal feature of the approach, which distinguishes it fromother drug-targeting and LDD systems, is that not pathology-specific epitopes but abundant structural components oftissue are used as a molecular target. Because such compo-nents are present throughout the tissue at high concentrations,the tissue would be used as a high capacity support foraccumulating a high concentration of the drug.

In the present study, we describe a selection of moleculespotentially suitable for the role of affinity vehicle within theaforementioned ECM-LDD approach.

MethodsMaterialsFluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC), fluorescein-5-maleimide,tetramethylrhodamine-5(6)-isothiocyanate (TRITC),N-succinimidylS-acetylthioacetate (SATA), andN-(e-maleimidocaproyloxy)-succinimide ester (EMCS) were from Pierce. Poly-L-lysine andpoly-L-arginine of different molecular weights, ranging from 3000 to99 000, as well as lactoferrin and bovine albumin were obtained fromSigma Chemical Co. Protamine was from Kabi, and Starburst(PAMAM) dendrimer (generation 4) was from Aldrich. A peptideGRRRGGGRG-amide containing a consensus sequence for bindingto glycosaminoglycans (GAGs)8,9 and the GAG-binding 14-merpeptide from vitronectin with the sequence KKQRFRHRNRKGYR(kindly provided by Dr K. Preissner, Institute of Biochemistry,Germany)10 were both synthesized with an additional cysteine on theN-terminus. The fluorescence-labeled GAG-binding peptide fromAb-amyloid (1-40) was kindly supplied by Dr C. Glabe, Universityof California, Irvine,11 and lipoprotein lipase from bovine milk wasprovided by Dr L. Havekes, Gaubius Laboratory, Leiden, TheNetherlands. Hirudin (Refludan) was purchased from HoechstMarion Roussel; bovine thrombin was from Akzo.

Labeling of Proteins and Peptides WithFluorescein DerivativesThe candidate affinity vehicles (except for the GAG-binding peptidefrom vitronectin and the peptide containing the consensus sequencefor GAG binding) at concentrations of 2 to 4 mg/mL in a buffercontaining 30 mmol/L sodium bicarbonate and 140 mmol/L NaCl,pH 9.2, were incubated for 1 hour in the dark with FITC at a finalconcentration of 60mmol/L. The preparations were then gel-filteredinto saline buffered with 20 mmol/L Tris-HCl (TBS), pH 7.5.Thrombin was labeled with TRITC in a similar manner. TheGAG-binding peptide from vitronectin and the consensus peptidewere synthesized with an additional cysteine at the N-terminus forlabeling with fluorescein-5-maleimide. The peptides at 0.5 mmol/Lin TBS, containing 1 mmol/L EDTA, were incubated with fluores-cein-5-maleimide at 0.5 mmol/L for 1 hour, blocked with 5 mmol/L

N-ethylmaleimide, and separated from unbound fluorescein by gelfiltration into TBS.

Selection of Candidate Affinity Vehicles: Bindingto Cross Sections of Blood VesselsThe fluorescein-labeled candidate affinity vehicles at a concentrationof 30 mg/mL in human citrated plasma were incubated with 8mmfresh-frozen sections of human aorta for 1 hour at room temperature,and binding was assessed by using a fluorescence microscope.

Ex Vivo Intravascular Delivery of FITC-PolylysineInto Human Umbilical ArteryOne end of a 2-cm piece of human umbilical artery was secured ona plastic tube connected to a syringe equipped with a manometer. Toremove any remaining blood, the vessel was rinsed with a fewmilliliters of TBS and pumped through with a few milliliters of air.Then it was rinsed with 200mL of human citrated plasma containing0.5 mg/mL FITC-polylysine. The open end of the vessel was ligated,and the same plasma with FITC-polylysine was pumped in with asyringe and kept under pressure of 0.35 atm for 30 minutes. Then theligation was removed, and the vessel was perfused with TBS at 10mL/min. After the desired time periods, pieces of the distal part ofthe vessel ('0.7 cm long) were cut off and snap-frozen in liquidnitrogen. A similar experiment was performed with FITC-labeledBSA. Cross sections (8mm) of the vessel were dried and viewedunder a fluorescence microscope.

In order to quantify the local concentration of FITC-polylysinebound within the luminal layer, 20-mm cross sections of theumbilical artery were prepared, and the bound FITC-polylysine waseluted from it with TBS, to which NaCl had been added to a finalconcentration of 2 mol/L. The amount of fluorescence in the eluatewas measured with an LS50B spectrofluorometer (Perkin-Elmer),and the amount of eluted FITC-polylysine was determined by usinga calibration curve obtained with dilutions of FITC-polylysine. Thelocal concentration of bound FITC-polylysine was calculated as theratio of the amount of eluted FITC-polylysine and the volume of thesaturated layer of the section. The volume was calculated as aproduct of the thickness of the section, the perimeter of the vessel,and the depth of the layer saturated with polylysine. The experimentwas performed in triplicate. At least 4 sections from each of the 3vessels were used for FITC-polylysine quantification.

In Vivo Intravascular Delivery of FITC-PolylysineInto a Segment of Rat Carotid ArteryMale Wistar rats were anesthetized with pentobarbital sodium(Nembutal) and Hypnorm (0.315 mg fentanyl citrate and 10 mgfluanisone per milliliter), and a 1-cm segment of a common carotidartery was separated with atraumatic vascular clamps, freed of bloodthrough a catheter introduced via the inner carotid artery, and washedwith saline buffered with 20 mmol/L HEPES, pH 7.5. Then thesegment was filled with either FITC-polylysine (99 kDa) or FITC-albumin, both at a concentration of 1 mg/mL in the same buffer, andincubated for 20 minutes under a pressure of 0.35 atm (the pressurewas limited by the strength of the clamps and was severalfold lowerthan the pressure achievable in intravascular catheters12). Then thetip of the catheter was removed, and the bloodstream was restored.The rats were euthanized after timed intervals ranging from 15minutes to 72 hours. The treated segments of the carotid arterieswere removed and snap-frozen. The fluorescence retained wasassessed with a fluorescence microscope and 8-mm frozen crosssections. Some of the frozen pieces of the vessels were thawed andfixed in ice-cold 10% formalin, paraffinized, and sectioned forhistological staining with hematoxylin-phloxine-saffron.

Conjugation of Polylysine With HirudinThe heterobifunctional cross-linking agent EMCS was used forconjugation of polylysine with recombinant hirudin. Hirudin (Mr

7000) at 1 mg/mL was first incubated with 1.5 mmol/L SATA for 1hour to introduce protected sulfhydryl (SH) groups into the hirudinmolecule, and unreacted SATA was removed by gel filtration.Polylysine (99 kDa) at 1 mg/mL was incubated for 1 hour with1.5 mmol/L EMCS to introduce SH-reactive maleimide groups into

944 Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. June 2001

by guest on May 23, 2018

http://atvb.ahajournals.org/D

ownloaded from

polylysine. After removal of free EMCS from the polylysine solution(gel filtration) and deprotection of SH groups in SATA-hirudin(incubation with 0.5 mol/L hydroxylamine HCl for 2 hours, accord-ing to a Pierce protocol), the 2 solutions were mixed at a molar ratioof 10:1 (hirudin:polylysine) and incubated for 1.5 hours, and cysteinewas added to a final concentration of 30 mmol/L to block reactivegroups. The hirudin-polylysine conjugate was separated from freehirudin on a column with CM-Sepharose, which was equilibratedwith a 50 mmol/L phosphate buffer containing 50 mmol/L NaCl, pH7.5. Free hirudin passed through, whereas the conjugate was elutedwith a phosphate buffer containing 1.3 mol/L NaCl and dialyzed intosaline buffered with 20 mmol/L HEPES, pH 7.5. The hirudin activitytest showed that'30% of hirudin was conjugated with polylysine.Thus, '3 hirudin molecules were conjugated to each polylysinemolecule.

Ex Vivo Intravascular Delivery ofHirudin-Polylysine Into Rat Carotid ArteryA segment ('1.5 cm) of the common carotid artery was removedfrom an anesthetized rat and kept for 12 to 18 hours in cell culturemedium at 4°C before the experiment. The polylysine-hirudinconjugate at a concentration 1 mg/mL was delivered into such asegment by using the technique and conditions described above forhuman umbilical arteries. The segments of the arteries were thenperfused with TBS for 20 minutes and frozen, and 8-mm crosssections were prepared. The sections were washed for 20 minuteswith several changes of TBS containing 20 mg/mL BSA (TBS-BSA)and incubated with TRITC-thrombin at 10mg/mL in TBS-BSA for30 minutes. After the unbound fluorescence was washed away, thedistribution of bound TRITC-thrombin was documented with thefluorescence microscope.

Results

Selection of Potential Affinity Vehicles: Binding toCross Sections of Human AortaTo select molecules suitable for the role of affinity vehicle forECM-targeted LDD, we studied the binding of a number ofcandidate molecules to fresh-frozen sections of human aorta.Incubation with the sections was performed in the presence ofhuman plasma to imitate the conditions of delivery in vivo.The following molecules were included in the study on thebasis of their known GAG-binding properties: protaminesulfate, a peptide with a consensus sequence for binding toglycosaminoglycans,8 lactoferrin,13 lipoprotein lipase,14 aGAG-binding peptide from Ab-amyloid,15 and a GAG-binding peptide from vitronectin.10 Polylysine and polyargi-nine of various molecular weights and Starburst dendrimerwere included in the screening as well, because their strongpositive charge suggests that they could also bind to vascularGAGs. Of the molecules tested, only a few showed a strongbinding: namely, protamine sulfate, Figure 1A; polylysine(29, 52, and 99 kDa), shown in Figure 1B for polylysine 99kDa; polyarginine (11 kDa), not shown; a GAG-bindingpeptide from vitronectin, Figure 1C; and the Starburst den-drimer, Figure 1D. These molecules bound to all parts of thevessel wall, although the patterns of their staining showedcertain difference. Polylysine of 10 kDa showed a somewhatweaker binding (not shown), whereas high molecular weightpolyarginine (92 kDa) caused protein aggregation in plasma.The other molecules tested did not bind to the sections:namely, the peptide with a consensus sequence for binding toglycosaminoglycans, lactoferrin, lipoprotein lipase, a GAG-binding peptide from Ab-amyloid, polylysine with a molec-ular weight of 3000 (not shown), and albumin (Figure 1E).

Further experiments reported in the present study wereperformed with polylysine with a molecular weight of99 000, because this molecule showed the most uniformstaining of the sections.

Delivery and Retention of Affinity Vehicle WithinHuman Umbilical Artery Wall Ex VivoHuman umbilical artery was used as a simple ex vivo modelof a middle-sized human artery to study intravascular deliv-ery and retention of polylysine. After 30 minutes of delivery

Figure 2. Binding and retention of FITC-polylysine (A and B) orFITC-BSA (C) in a human umbilical artery ex vivo. Fluorescenceimages of cross sections of human umbilical arteries. A and B,Artery was perfused with buffered saline for 5 minutes (A) and72 hours (B) after intravascular delivery of FITC-polylysine. C,Artery was perfused with buffered saline for 1 hour after intra-vascular delivery of FITC-BSA. Asterisks show the location ofthe lumen. Bar5200 mm.

Figure 1. Binding of candidate affinity vehicles to cross sectionsof human aorta. FITC-labeled molecules were incubated withcross sections in human plasma. A, Protamine sulfate. B, Poly-lysine (99 kDa). C, GAG-binding peptide from vitronectin. D,Starburst PAMAM dendrimer. E, Albumin. Bar5100 mm.

Sakharov et al Extracellular Matrix–Targeted Local Drug Delivery 945

by guest on May 23, 2018

http://atvb.ahajournals.org/D

ownloaded from

under pressure, FITC-polylysine was accumulated in asharply visible luminal layer of'80 mm depth (Figure 2A).The bound material was not washed out noticeably after 72hours of perfusion (Figure 2B). In contrast, FITC-BSA didnot accumulate significantly in the vessel wall and wascompletely washed out after 1 hour (Figure 2C).

To estimate the local concentration of FITC-polylysinebound within the luminal layer, the bound material was elutedfrom 20-mm-thick sections with a buffer containing 2 mol/LNaCl. The greater part of the fluorescence was removed fromthe cross section as a result of such elution. Amounts ofFITC-polylysine in the range of 140 to 260 ng were elutedfrom the sections with a standard variation between differentsections within the same vessel not.6% (n54). The volumesof the fluorescence-bearing areas ranged from 7 to 10 nL. Onthe basis of 3 independent experiments, the concentration ofthe bound polylysine within the stained area was calculated as21.963.8 g/L (n53).

Delivery and Retention of Affinity Vehicle in Wallof Rat Carotid Artery In VivoAfter intravascular delivery in vivo into a rat carotid arteryand restoration of the blood flow through the vessel, boundFITC-polylysine was found throughout the vessel wall (Fig-ure 3A). After 24 hours and 72 hours (Figure 3B and 3C,respectively), a significant part of originally bound fluores-cence could still be found throughout the vessel wall. Incontrast, FITC-albumin was mostly washed away in 90minutes (Figure 3D). Histological examination of the sectionsof rat carotid arteries removed 24 hours (Figure 3E and 3F)and 72 hours (not shown) after delivery of FITC-polylysineor FITC-albumin revealed neither significant changes in themorphology of the vessel wall nor signs of inflammation,immune response, or thrombosis. The state of the endotheli-um was not ideal in either FITC-polylysine–treated or FITC-albumin–treated vessels, probably as a consequence of theintravascular intervention or of the freezing and thawing ofthe vessels before they were embedded in paraffin.

Delivery of Hirudin Into Rat Carotid ArteryEx VivoFigure 4 shows that hirudin coupled to polylysine can befound within a luminal layer of the artery after intravasculardelivery ex vivo. Staining with TRITC-labeled thrombin wasused to visualize the distribution of the bound hirudin withinthe vessel wall and to demonstrate that bound hirudin wasstill functional. The penetration of the conjugate into thevascular wall was somewhat restricted compared with that ofpolylysine (Figure 3A), supposedly because of the largermolecular size of the conjugate. If a mixture of the 2unconjugated components (hirudin and polylysine) was de-livered into the vessel wall in a similar manner, almost nobinding of TRITC-thrombin to the cross sections was ob-served (not shown).

DiscussionIn the present study, we describe a novel approach in drugdelivery, ECM-LDD. The major idea behind this approach,

Figure 3. Binding and retention of FITC-polylysine in a rat carotid artery after intravascular delivery in vivo. Fluorescence images ofcross sections of rat carotid arteries. A through C, Arteries were obtained 15 minutes (A), 24 hours (B), and 72 hours (C) after intravas-cular delivery of FITC-polylysine. D, Artery was obtained 90 minutes after intravascular delivery of FITC-albumin. Asterisks show thelocation of the lumen. E and F, Histological staining of the arteries obtained 24 hours after intravascular delivery of FITC-polylysine (E)and FITC-albumin (F). Bars5100 mm.

Figure 4. Binding of hirudin-polylysine conjugate in a rat carotidartery. The conjugate was delivered intravascularly, and then thecross sections were prepared and stained with TRITC-thrombin.Asterisk shows the location of the lumen. Bar5100 mm.

946 Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. June 2001

by guest on May 23, 2018

http://atvb.ahajournals.org/D

ownloaded from

distinguishing it from other drug-targeting and LDD methods,is that structural extracellular components of tissue are usedas a high-capacity support capable of accumulating a highconcentration of the drug. The bifunctional drug, comprisingan affinity vehicle and a “therapeutic effector” moiety, isdelivered under pressure into a target tissue and is retained bybinding of the affinity vehicle to an abundant and ubiquitouscomponent(s) of the ECM, providing long-term retention ofthe drug in the locus of pathology. The most interestingapplication of the approach is, obviously, prevention/treat-ment of restenosis. Therefore, the present study is focused onthe application of ECM-LDD to intravascular delivery.

An important feature of the ECM-LDD is that the affinityvehicle does not have to show pathology-specific binding,because the drug would be directed to the desired site not bysite/pathology-specific molecular recognition but by localdelivery under pressure via an intravascular catheter. Strongbinding of the affinity vehicle to the target component(s) andalso the abundant and ubiquitous presence of the targetcomponent(s) within the vascular wall are seen as essentialrequirements for the successful realization of the ECM-LDDapproach.

The present study is focused on a selection of potentialaffinity vehicles that meet these requirements and on acharacterization of their local intravascular delivery andretention. Molecular targets for ECM-directed delivery arethe major proteins of the vascular ECM (eg, collagen,laminin, elastin, and fibronectin) and GAGs. Vascular GAGsare distributed throughout all layers of the vessel wall ratherubiquitously16 and, therefore, represent an attractive target fordrug delivery. We screened a number of molecules withknown GAG-binding properties, as well as a few positivelycharged molecules, which might bind to the negativelycharged GAGs.

SelectionOf a number of compounds screened, a few showed signifi-cant binding to cross sections of human aorta in the presenceof plasma. Polylysine with anMr of $29 000 showed themost even and ubiquitous binding in this assay and, therefore,was used in further experiments. A number of other mole-cules, such as protamine, the GAG-binding peptide fromvitronectin, and a Starburst dendrimer, were also positive inthe selection assay and are currently being studied in moredetail. The rest of the molecules did not bind to the sections,although on the basis of the data from the literature, bindingmight have been expected. Among them are the short peptidewith a consensus sequence for GAG binding.8 The lack ofbinding of such peptides is consistent with the recent data byVerrecchio et al,17 who report that 3- and 4-mers of suchpeptides, but not monomers and dimers, show strong bindingto GAGs.

CharacterizationWith polylysine as a model affinity vehicle, we made thefollowing observations, important for characterizing thismethod of drug delivery: (1) After intravascular deliveryunder pressure, bound polylysine is found in a luminal layerat a depth of a few 10s of micrometers. In small vessels (as ratcarotid artery), this results in saturation of the whole depth ofthe vessel wall; in larger vessels (as human umbilical artery),

only a part of the vessel is saturated with bound polylysine.(2) Within the said layer, bound polylysine is distributedevenly and ubiquitously, showing no preferential staining ofany particular structures. Such distribution is consistent withthe hypothesis that polylysine binds mostly to GAGs, whichare present throughout the vascular wall. (3) On bindingwithin the luminal layer, polylysine concentrates up to 20g/L. This gives an estimate of the concentration of the drugthat can be delivered and retained in the vascular wall usingthe method of ECM-LDD. (4) Polylysine bound within theluminal layer of the vessel wall is retained for at least days exvivo under perfusion conditions and in vivo after restorationof the blood flow.

All these observations are consistent with the idea that thebinding sites within the luminal layer of the vascular wallbecome saturated with polylysine as a result of strong bindingand that the layer, saturated with polylysine, slowly extendsalong with pressure/diffusion-driven influx of polylysinefrom the lumen. Polylysine concentrates within this layerbecause of a high concentration of the binding sites.

An important implication of the aforementioned observa-tions is that in addition to increased retention, the ECM-LDDmethod may increase the efficiency of local delivery, ie, thefraction of the substance that leaves the catheter and isdeposited in the vessel wall. In practice, this value isgenerally ,1%.1 Because of strong binding to the ECM,polylysine molecules entering the vascular wall appear to becaptured therein and, therefore, are prevented from escapingto the systemic circulation. It has been shown recently that theefficiency of intramural delivery of platelet-derived growthfactor18 and tissue factor pathway inhibitor,12 which bothhave moderate binding properties toward the extracellularmatrix, is somewhat higher than that of nonbinding proteins.However, the saturation-like profile has not been observed inthe case of platelet-derived growth factor, probably becausethe binding was not strong enough. Tissue factor pathwayinhibitor was mostly found next to the luminal surface. Howstrong binding to ECM (eg, in the case of polylysine) affectsthe efficiency of catheter-based intravascular delivery is asubject of our further study. We are also studying in a greaterdetail how the concentration of bound affinity vehicle, thedepth of its penetration into the vascular wall, and retentionare affected by properties of the affinity vehicle (size, charge,and affinity) and those of the target component (concentrationand accessibility of the binding sites) as well as by thevariables of local delivery (pressure and duration) and thestate of endothelium.

Accessibility of the subendothelial ECM is an importantcondition for realization of the ECM-LDD. In the case ofanti-restenosis treatment, the method is supposed to be usedin situations in which the endothelium is either destroyed ordamaged by ballooning and preexisting atherosclerosis. In thepresent study, we did not physically remove the endothelium(although it could be damaged, because in all experiments acertain amount of air was bubbled through the vessels, andthe vessels used in ex vivo experiments were stored forcertain time at 4°C before the experiments). Still, this did notprevent accumulation of polylysine within the vessel wall,suggesting that the method can potentially be used also insituations in which the endothelium is not fully removed. Thisis consistent with the data showing that endothelium repre-

Sakharov et al Extracellular Matrix–Targeted Local Drug Delivery 947

by guest on May 23, 2018

http://atvb.ahajournals.org/D

ownloaded from

sents only a relative barrier for the transport of macromole-cules,19 reducing transmural transport of middle-sized pro-teins 4- to 7-fold12,20and that the transendothelial transport ofproteins increases severalfold as a result of pressureapplication.21

In the present study, we have demonstrated that theexample affinity vehicle (polylysine) can deliver either asmall molecule (fluorescein) or a relatively large biologicallyactive polypeptide (hirudin) to the ECM of the vascular wall.Thus, in general, low molecular weight compounds andproteins/enzymes can be tested in the future as therapeuticeffectors within the ECM-LDD approach. The list of potentialtherapeutic effectors includes anticoagulants, antiplateletdrugs, cytostatics, cytoskeletal inhibitors, proapoptotic effec-tors, vasorelaxants, and other substances considered as po-tential anti-restenotic drugs for systemic or local administra-tion. Depending on the desirable mode of action (eg,extracellular or intracellular), the therapeutic effector may beattached to the affinity vehicle either through a stable or anunstable link, respectively, providing, in the latter case, acontrolled release of the drug inside the vascular wall.

The Table summarizes important features of the existingvariants of drug administration compared with the ECM-LDD method. It is to be hoped that this method will open newperspectives in intravascular drug delivery, because it pro-vides a combination of extremely high local concentration,uniform and ubiquitous distribution, and long-term intravas-cular retention of the drug, apparently unachievable withother methods.

AcknowledgmentThis study was supported by grant 98.134 from the NetherlandsHeart Foundation.

References1. Brieger D, Topol E. Local delivery systems and prevention of restenosis.

Cardiovasc Res. 1997;35:405–413.2. Fram DB, Aretz T, Azrin MA, Mitchel JF, Samady H, Gillam LD,

Sahatijan R, Waters D, McKay RG. Localized intramural drug deliveryduring balloon angioplasty using hydrogel-coated balloons and pressure-augmented diffusion.J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994;23:1570–1577.

3. Lefkovits J, Topol EJ. Pharmacological approaches for prevention ofrestenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention.Prog CardiovascDis. 1997;40:141–158.

4. Nasser TK, Wilensky RL, Mehdi K, March KL. Microparticle depositionin periarterial microvasculature and intraluminal dissections after porous

balloon delivery into atherosclerotic vessels.Am Heart J. 1996;131:892–898.

5. Slepian MJ. Polymeric endoluminal gel paving: therapeutic hydrogelbarriers and sustained drug delivery depots for local arterial wall bioma-nipulation.Semin Interv Cardiol. 1996;1:103–116.

6. Lovich MA, Edelman ER. Computational simulations of local vascularheparin deposition and distribution.Am J Physiol. 1996;271:H2014–H2024.

7. Hudson PJ. Recombinant antibody constructs in cancer therapy.CurrOpin Immunol. 1999;11:548–557.

8. Cardin AD, Weintraub HIR. Molecular modeling of protein-glycosami-noglycans interactions.Arteriosclerosis. 1989;9:21–32.

9. Fromm JM, Hileman RE, Caldwell EEO, Weiler JM, Linhardt RJ. Patternand spacing of basic amino acids in heparin-binding sites.Arch BiochemBiophys. 1997;343:92–100.

10. Rosenblatt S, Bassuk JA, Alpers CE, Sage EH, Timpl R, Preissner KT.Differential modulation of cell adhesion by interaction between adhesiveand counter-adhesive proteins: characterization of the binding of vitro-nectin to osteonectin (BM40, SPARC).Biochem J. 1997;324:311–319.

11. Garzon-Rodriguez W, Sepulveda-Becerra M, Milton S, Glabe CG.Soluble amyloid Ab-(1-40) exists as a stable dimer at low concentrations.J Biol Chem. 1997;272:21037–21044.

12. Yang L,-Y, St Pierre J, Scherrer DE, Lasala JM, Walsh RG, AbendscheinDR. Comparison of methods of local delivery of tissue factor pathwayinhibitor to balloon-injured arteries in rabbits.Coron Artery Dis. 1999;10:327–333.

13. Mann DM, Romm E, Migliorini M. Delineation of glycosaminoglycan-binding site in the human inflammatory response protein lactoferrin.J Biol Chem. 1994;269:23661–23667.

14. Margelin D, Pigier AM, Gardette J, Bertrand J, Vu-Dac N, Picard J.Evidence for an interaction of lipoprotein lipase with artery wall proteo-glycans.Int J Biochem. 1989;21:761–768.

15. Snow AD, Kinsella MD, Parks E, Sekiguchi RT, Miller JD, Kimata K,Wight TN. Differential binding of vascular cell-derived proteoglycans(perlecan, biglycan, decorin, and versican) to the beta-amyloid protein ofAlzheimer’s disease.Arch Biochem Biophys. 1995;320:84–95.

16. Wight TN. Cell biology of arterial proteoglycans.Arteriosclerosis. 1989;9:1–20.

17. Verrecchio A, Germann MW, Schick BP, Kung B, Twardowski T, SanAntonio JD. Design of peptides with high affinities for heparin andendothelial cell proteoglycans.J Biol Chem. 2000;275:7701–7707.

18. Wilensky RL, Mehdi K, Sowinski KM, Baek SH, March KL. Increasedintramural retention after local delivery of molecules with increasedbinding properties.J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther. 1999;4:103–112.

19. Chobanian AV, Menzoian JO, Shipman J, Heath K, Haudenschild CC.Effects of endothelial denudation and cholesterol feeding on in vivotransport of albumin, glucose, and water across rabbit carotid artery.CircRes. 1983;53:805–814.

20. Fry DL, Haupt MW, Pap JM. Effect of endothelial integrity, transmuralpressure, and time on the intimal-medial uptake of serum125I-albumin and125I-LDL in an in vitro porcine arterial organ-support system.ArteriosclerThromb. 1992;12:1313–1328.

21. Curmi PA, Juan L, Tedgui A. Effect of transmural pressure on lowdensity lipoprotein and albumin transport and distribution across theintact arterial wall.Circ Res. 1990;66:1692–1702.

Comparison of Existing Methods of Drug Administration With theMethod of ECM-LDD

Potential Advantages

Methods of Drug Delivery

SDA CTDD LDD CDR-LDD ECM-LDD

High concentration in target tissue 2 1/2 1 1/2 1

Uniform distribution in target tissue 1 1/2 1 2 1

Long-term retention 2 1/2 2 1/2 1

Absence of systemic side effects 2 1 1 1 1

No need for pathology-specific epitope 1 2 1 1 1

SDA indicates systemic drug administration; CTDD, cell-targeted drug delivery; and CDR-LDD,controlled drug release after LDD.

948 Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. June 2001

by guest on May 23, 2018

http://atvb.ahajournals.org/D

ownloaded from

D. V. Sakharov, A. F. H. Jie, M. E. A. Bekkers, J. J. Emeis and D. C. RijkenHigh Accumulation and Long-Term Retention Within the Vascular Wall

Targeted Local Drug Delivery, Providing−Polylysine as a Vehicle for Extracellular Matrix

Print ISSN: 1079-5642. Online ISSN: 1524-4636 Copyright © 2001 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved.

Greenville Avenue, Dallas, TX 75231is published by the American Heart Association, 7272Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology

doi: 10.1161/01.ATV.21.6.9432001;21:943-948Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 

http://atvb.ahajournals.org/content/21/6/943World Wide Web at:

The online version of this article, along with updated information and services, is located on the

  http://atvb.ahajournals.org//subscriptions/

at: is onlineArteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology Information about subscribing to Subscriptions:

  http://www.lww.com/reprints

Information about reprints can be found online at: Reprints: 

document. Question and AnswerPermissions and Rightspage under Services. Further information about this process is available in the

which permission is being requested is located, click Request Permissions in the middle column of the WebCopyright Clearance Center, not the Editorial Office. Once the online version of the published article for

can be obtained via RightsLink, a service of theArteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biologyin Requests for permissions to reproduce figures, tables, or portions of articles originally publishedPermissions:

by guest on May 23, 2018

http://atvb.ahajournals.org/D

ownloaded from