political economy of energy subsidy reform (en)
TRANSCRIPT
POLITICAL ECONOMY OF ENERGY SUBSIDY REFORM
SIMON COMMANDER ALTURA PARTNERS & IE BUSINESS SCHOOL
September 9, 2014
MENA Knowledge Sharing and How-‐To in Subsidy Reform: Regional Workshop
2
Why is it so difficult to reform energy subsidies?
• Generally accepted that subsidies are undesirable Ø Fiscally costly, often unsustainable & growth impeding Ø Distort the structure of the economy Ø Create large negative external effects Ø Regressive – mostly appropriated by non-poor Ø Inefficient as instruments of social policy & protection
• Elements of best practice in reform well understood • So why are energy subsidies so difficult to reform? • Answer lies normally not just with technical or
institutional limitations but political factors
3
Reasons for a status quo bias
Ø Governments often lack credibility when promising improvements contingent on reform Ø Unable to address the problem of uncertainty
Ø Inability to identify accurately winners & losers, vested interest & other interested parties
Ø Lack of consultation-based reform strategies that reflect citizens’ preferences Ø è inability to convince of merits of reform
Ø Inability to propose better systems of social assistance Ø Absence of alternative delivery mechanisms & weak
institutional capacity affecting scope & integrity
4
Why citizens & interest groups often favour retention
Ø Self interest – they benefit directly from subsidies Ø Main barrier to reform mostly non-poor
Ø Reform options often perceived as creating only losers – other than government
Ø Perceptions of inequity – benefits of growth seen as accruing to only a minority of citizens - subsidies as offset
Ø Sense of entitlement + longevity of subsidy regime Ø Insufficient attention paid to designing transitional
compensation to non-poor groups Ø Inability to see how alternative systems of social
protection may work Ø Changes to subsidy regimes seen as driven by outsiders Ø Lack of legitimacy/trust between governments & citizens
Strategic consideraIons
Ø IdenIfy main policy objecIves including energy, socio-‐economic & climate change objecIves
Ø IdenIfy principal instruments including; Ø Price adjustments; fuel switching; technology soluIons; differenIated tariffs; compensaIon mechanisms & incidence; funding for renewables; insItuIonal channels
Ø Timing of implementaIon -‐ ex ante/ex post Ø IdenIfy main constraints;
Ø PoliIcal/civic/other opposiIon Ø Shocks to compeIIveness (sectoral dimensions) Ø Macroeconomic, including impact on prices & earnings Ø Impact on poverty
5
Strategic consideraIons
Ø IdenIfy changes to market structure, ownership, compeIIon & regulatory agencies Ø ParIcularly relevant to power sector including extent of
integraIon &/or unbundling Ø Note: such changes may improve performance but
operators can sIll face constraints on pricing Ø IdenIfy which stakeholders to consult
Ø but vested interests can oVen block Ø IdenIfy transparent longer term price seWng
mechanisms/rules
6
7
Key steps in effective policy design
1. Policy scenarios - fiscal & financial parameters, timing/phasing & institutional capacity
2. Consultation with citizens, key constituencies & interested parties/stakeholders to answer: Ø What trade-offs are different interests prepared to make
in reforming existing subsidy regimes? Ø What complementary policies are required to bolster
acceptance of reform (e.g., energy saving technology)? Ø Are changes required to market structure & ownership? Ø Are changes required to existing system of social
protection on a transitional or permanent basis?
8
Key steps in effective policy design
3. Scenario testing with focus groups & other
sampled individuals, firms & other bodies 4. Adaptation of policy scenarios consistent with
consultation-based feasibility analysis 5. Implementation & communications strategy
Ø Elements of a professional communications strategy include: Ø Elaboration of series of messages tailored for
specific outlets & audiences Ø Use of multiple channels – Broadcast/ TV/Radio/
Digital Communications/ Print….