policy debate

35
Policy Debate Core Concepts and Participant Training Michelle Kesling Redford Jaycees

Upload: akiva

Post on 22-Feb-2016

86 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Policy Debate. Core Concepts and Participant Training Michelle Kesling Redford Jaycees . Core Concepts. Who Can Participate in the Policy Debate Competition?. The short answer is anyone!. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Policy Debate

Policy Debate

Core Concepts and Participant Training

Michelle KeslingRedford Jaycees

Page 2: Policy Debate

Core Concepts

Page 3: Policy Debate

Who Can Participate in the Policy Debate Competition?

The short answer is anyone!All are eligible for the Policy Debate Program regardless of profession, experience, or office (in contrast to the limitations set by the existing Jaycee debate program).

But I have no experience.

The main differences between Policy Debate and the existing Jaycee debate are the type of topic and the format. You don’t have to have experience in order to participate.

Page 4: Policy Debate

What is Policy Debate?

• It is similar to Jaycee Debate in terms of difficulty

• There are a few differences:a. Who can participateb. Formatc. Topicd. Use of evidence

Page 5: Policy Debate

Why Should YOU Debate?

• Increases critical thinking skills- it requires participants to critically examine both sides of an issue. Promotes problem solving and innovative thinking

• Increases occupational achievement- participants develop strong listening skills, tact and self confidence which leads to taking on and being successful in leadership roles

• Increases communication and speaking skills- both necessary for career and personal development

Page 6: Policy Debate

What are the Benefits for your Chapter?

• Member Development

• Helps with Blue Chip

• Recruitment Tool

Page 7: Policy Debate

Participants Affirmative

TeamNegative

Team

1st Affirmative Speaker

2nd AffirmativeSpeaker

1st Negative Speaker

2nd NegativeSpeaker

VS.

Page 8: Policy Debate

Speaking Order and Format• 1st Affirmative Constructive – 4 minutes

– Cross Examination – 2 minutes• 1st Negative Constructive – 5 minutes

– Cross Examination – 2 minutes• 2nd Affirmative Constructive – 5 minutes

– Cross Examination – 2 minutes• 2nd Negative Constructive – 5 minutes

– Cross Examination – 2 minutes• 1st Negative Rebuttal – 3 minutes• 1st Affirmative Rebuttal – 4 minutes• 2nd Negative Rebuttal – 3 minutes• 2nd Affirmative Rebuttal – 3 minutes

• In round preparation time – 5 minutes/team that can be used anytime during the debate.

Page 9: Policy Debate

Type of Topics and Use of Evidence

• Topics are real world, policy oriented.

• Topics are announced weeks ahead of the competition.

• Use of evidence is permitted and encouraged although not required.

Page 10: Policy Debate

Affirmative Side

• Upholds the resolution• Promotes change to the status quo• Questions they answer– Why have we not done the proposed change yet?– Why is change good? What benefits will happen or

what harms will we change?– How the change will solve the problems or cause

the benefits to occur?

Page 11: Policy Debate

Negative Side

• Upholds the status quo• Says change proposed is a bad idea• Questions they answer– Are we already doing the proposed change? Do

we actually need to do anything different?– What negative things could happen because of the

proposed change?– Will the proposed change actually work?

Page 12: Policy Debate

Remember- Policy Debate is Switch Side

• You have an equal chance of having to defend either side

• Prepare to defend both

Aff Neg

Page 13: Policy Debate

What is a Constructive?

• Constructive speeches are used to set up the issues for the debate.

• This is the speech where new arguments are made.

• This is when you use your evidence to help build your arguments.

Page 14: Policy Debate

What is a Rebuttal?

• Rebuttal speeches are used to answer your opponents arguments.

• They are used to develop and deepen your own arguments.

• They should narrow down the debate to the few key arguments necessary for your side to win.

Page 15: Policy Debate

What is Cross-Examination?

• Cross-examination, or cross-ex, is a question and answer period between constructives.

• Cross-ex time is used to:– Ask clarifying questions– Set up your arguments for your next speech– Poke holes in your opponents arguments

Page 16: Policy Debate

But how do I know what arguments the other team is making?

• Flowing is a form of shorthand- it is a way to take notes of what the debaters say.

• It allows you to keep track of what your opponents are saying in order to know what arguments you have to answer in your next speech.

Page 17: Policy Debate

Use of Evidence

• As stated above, evidence is encouraged although not required

• Potential sources of evidence are: news reports, editorials, policy journals, websites, newspaper, etc.

• You can indict opponents evidence

Page 18: Policy Debate

Questions?

Page 19: Policy Debate

The Affirmative

Page 20: Policy Debate

Being Affirmative

• Remember they uphold the resolution

• Does not have to be the whole resolution- you can pick one issue that is part of the resolution

• They speak first and last

Page 21: Policy Debate

How to put together a 1AC

• Inherency

• Plan Text

• Advantage/ Harms

• Solvency

Page 22: Policy Debate

The Negative

Page 23: Policy Debate

Being Negative

• The uphold the present system

• They prove the change the affirmative endorses is a bad idea

• Can use multiple reasons and avenues of argumentation to prove the affirmative is wrong

Page 24: Policy Debate

Case Arguments

• These are usually internal things that are wrong with the affirmative

• Examples:– The affirmative won’t actually fix the problem– The problems are already being solved outside of

the affirmative

Page 25: Policy Debate

Topicality

• Topicality ensures that the debate is actually about the topic

• It utilizes the definition of a word and proves why the affirmative is outside the topic area

TOPICAL AFF

UNTOPICAL AFF

RESOLUTION

Page 26: Policy Debate

Topicality Format

• Definition of the word that they violate• Statement of reason they violate• Why it matters that they violate– Is it not fair?– Does it make it to hard to debate? Or be prepared

for?

Page 27: Policy Debate

Disadvantages

• This is usually an external consequence of the affirmative happening

• Example– If you pass plan, it costs a bunch of money, then

we cant pay for other things– Focusing on this plan means that the government

cant focus on this other important plan

Page 28: Policy Debate

Disadvantage Format

• How things are now

• What the plan does to change it

• What the ultimate consequence is

Page 29: Policy Debate

Turns

• Used by BOTH affirmative and negative• They are an offensive argument• By using it you are saying whatever the other

team says is good, is actually bad, or vice versa• For example:

– They say we should do plan because it makes driving easier which is good. You say making driving easier is bad because its bad for the environment.

Page 30: Policy Debate

Remember Cross-EX

• The point of Cross-ex is to clarify as well as set up arguments

• You will be asked questions after you finish your constructive.

• One member of the other team (the person who does not speak next) will ask you questions.

• You will also have to ask questions of the other team.

Page 31: Policy Debate

Cross- Ex Tips

• Remember to ask questions. Statements followed by the phrase “right?” are not actual questions.

• BE NICE. You can be confident and assertive without being rude.

• Set up arguments, don’t make arguments in cross-ex.

Page 32: Policy Debate

Flowing

• This is a way of keeping track of everything that is said in the debate.

• Each speech is written in a column with following speeches written next to them.

• This format allows you to see the structure and outline of the speech. Assists in organization.

• Developing a shorthand will help you write down everything that is said.

Page 33: Policy Debate

FlowingSee the multiple

columns?

See the shorthand?

Page 34: Policy Debate

Judging- What am I being evaluated on?

• Debate is still a persuasive activity.

• Judging is somewhat subjective- based on logical arguments for why you should be preferred.

• Usually it comes down to a cost benefit analysis of the policy being proposed.

Page 35: Policy Debate

Questions?