policies for the reduction of gasoline consumption · “rebound effect” offsets 10 percent of...

23
Confronting Global Warming: Confronting Global Warming: Policies for the Reduction of Policies for the Reduction of Gasoline Consumption Gasoline Consumption Sarah E. West Sarah E. West Associate Professor Associate Professor Department of Economics Department of Economics Macalester College Macalester College Email: Email: [email protected] [email protected] Homepage: Homepage: http:// http:// www.macalester.edu/~wests www.macalester.edu/~wests

Upload: others

Post on 21-Sep-2020

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Policies for the Reduction of Gasoline Consumption · “Rebound effect” offsets 10 percent of initial fuel reduction from tighter CAFE standards (Small and Van Dender 2006) Like

Confronting Global Warming:Confronting Global Warming:Policies for the Reduction of Policies for the Reduction of

Gasoline ConsumptionGasoline Consumption

Sarah E. West Sarah E. West Associate ProfessorAssociate Professor

Department of EconomicsDepartment of EconomicsMacalester CollegeMacalester College

Email: Email: [email protected]@macalester.eduHomepage: Homepage: http://http://www.macalester.edu/~westswww.macalester.edu/~wests

Page 2: Policies for the Reduction of Gasoline Consumption · “Rebound effect” offsets 10 percent of initial fuel reduction from tighter CAFE standards (Small and Van Dender 2006) Like

U.S. Carbon Dioxide by Sector (2005)U.S. Carbon Dioxide by Sector (2005)(Data Source: Energy Information Administration)

Residential21%

Commercial17%

Transport 33%

Industrial29%

Page 3: Policies for the Reduction of Gasoline Consumption · “Rebound effect” offsets 10 percent of initial fuel reduction from tighter CAFE standards (Small and Van Dender 2006) Like

OutlineOutline

Gasoline, miles driven, fuel efficiencyGasoline, miles driven, fuel efficiency

Justifications for regulationJustifications for regulation

A few policy optionsA few policy options

Gasoline tax Gasoline tax Carbon tax or tradable carbon permitsCarbon tax or tradable carbon permitsFuel economy standards Fuel economy standards

New research directionsNew research directions

Page 4: Policies for the Reduction of Gasoline Consumption · “Rebound effect” offsets 10 percent of initial fuel reduction from tighter CAFE standards (Small and Van Dender 2006) Like

Gasoline PricesGasoline Prices

Page 5: Policies for the Reduction of Gasoline Consumption · “Rebound effect” offsets 10 percent of initial fuel reduction from tighter CAFE standards (Small and Van Dender 2006) Like

Components of the price of gasolineComponents of the price of gasoline

Page 6: Policies for the Reduction of Gasoline Consumption · “Rebound effect” offsets 10 percent of initial fuel reduction from tighter CAFE standards (Small and Van Dender 2006) Like

Gasoline consumptionGasoline consumptionGasoline and Gasohol Consumption 1990-2004

(Source: FWHA Highway Statistics 2005)

2004: 44

1990: 7.5

1990: 110.2

2004: 136.5Total

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004Year

Bill

ions

of g

allo

ns

Gasoline

Gasohol

Page 7: Policies for the Reduction of Gasoline Consumption · “Rebound effect” offsets 10 percent of initial fuel reduction from tighter CAFE standards (Small and Van Dender 2006) Like

Vehicle miles traveled: 1990Vehicle miles traveled: 1990--20052005(Source: FWHA (Source: FWHA Highway Statistics)Highway Statistics)

Vehicle Miles Traveled (per capita)

2005:10,087

1991:8,586

1990:8,590

7,500

8,000

8,500

9,000

9,500

10,000

10,500

1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005Year

Page 8: Policies for the Reduction of Gasoline Consumption · “Rebound effect” offsets 10 percent of initial fuel reduction from tighter CAFE standards (Small and Van Dender 2006) Like

Vehicle miles traveled: 2006Vehicle miles traveled: 2006--20082008(Source: FWHA (Source: FWHA Traffic Volume Trends)Traffic Volume Trends)

Page 9: Policies for the Reduction of Gasoline Consumption · “Rebound effect” offsets 10 percent of initial fuel reduction from tighter CAFE standards (Small and Van Dender 2006) Like

Changes in the vehicle marketChanges in the vehicle market(Data Sources: (Data Sources: Ward’s Automotive Yearbook, Transportation Energy Data Book)

Share of Total Vehicle Sales

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1984

1987

1990

1993

1996

1999

2002

Year

Shar

e

CarsPickupsVansSUVs

Page 10: Policies for the Reduction of Gasoline Consumption · “Rebound effect” offsets 10 percent of initial fuel reduction from tighter CAFE standards (Small and Van Dender 2006) Like

Falling fuel economyFalling fuel economy(Source: (Source: Transportation Energy Data BookTransportation Energy Data Book))

Fleet Fuel Economy

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

1978

1979

1980

1981

1982

1983

1984

1985

1986

1987

1988

1989

1990

1991

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

YEAR

MP

G

Total FleetPassenger CarsLight-duty Trucks

Page 11: Policies for the Reduction of Gasoline Consumption · “Rebound effect” offsets 10 percent of initial fuel reduction from tighter CAFE standards (Small and Van Dender 2006) Like

Justifications for regulationJustifications for regulation

Per mile externalities

CongestionAccidentsLocal Pollution

Per gallon externalities

Global warmingOil dependence

Interaction with labor market

Possible failures in market for fuel economy

Page 12: Policies for the Reduction of Gasoline Consumption · “Rebound effect” offsets 10 percent of initial fuel reduction from tighter CAFE standards (Small and Van Dender 2006) Like

External costs of vehicle useExternal costs of vehicle useSource: Parry et al. (Source: Parry et al. (JELJEL 2007))2007))

$0.06

$0.12

Per mile externalities

$2.10

Per mile externalities

Global Warming

Oil dependency

Page 13: Policies for the Reduction of Gasoline Consumption · “Rebound effect” offsets 10 percent of initial fuel reduction from tighter CAFE standards (Small and Van Dender 2006) Like

Per mile externalitiesPer mile externalities(Source: Parry et al. (Source: Parry et al. (JEL(JEL 2007))2007))

Accidents$0.63

Local Pollution

$0.42

Congestion $1.05

Congestion

Accidents

Local Pollution

Page 14: Policies for the Reduction of Gasoline Consumption · “Rebound effect” offsets 10 percent of initial fuel reduction from tighter CAFE standards (Small and Van Dender 2006) Like

Interactions with labor marketInteractions with labor market(Source: West and Williams ((Source: West and Williams (JPubEJPubE 2007)2007)

Taxes on labor are inefficient because they reduce work

If a gasoline tax:Reduces work, labor markets become even less efficientIncreases work, labor markets become more efficient

Gasoline and leisure are relative complements—a gasoline tax increases work

Optimal gas tax even higher than external costs

ExternalCosts

LaborMarketInteraction

Page 15: Policies for the Reduction of Gasoline Consumption · “Rebound effect” offsets 10 percent of initial fuel reduction from tighter CAFE standards (Small and Van Dender 2006) Like

Are there failures in the Are there failures in the market for fuel economy?market for fuel economy?

Do consumers undervalue future fuel costs?

Greene (1997): small savings, too much information, boundedly rational consumers → undervaluation

Kleit (Econ. Inquir. 2004) speaking of MPG: “it is difficult to think of an automobile attribute that is better communicated to consumers” (p. 281)

Dreyfus and Viscusi (J. Law Econ. 1995): “consumers do have a long-term perspective with respect to safety and fuel efficiency…” (p. 103)

Page 16: Policies for the Reduction of Gasoline Consumption · “Rebound effect” offsets 10 percent of initial fuel reduction from tighter CAFE standards (Small and Van Dender 2006) Like

Are there failures in the Are there failures in the market for fuel economy?market for fuel economy?

Surprisingly little work has been done to determine the effect of CAFE on producers’ fuel efficiency decisions

Greene (1997) “magic of standards”

Portney et al. (JEP 2003) “manufacturers could undersupply vehicle attributes”—strategic behavior

Page 17: Policies for the Reduction of Gasoline Consumption · “Rebound effect” offsets 10 percent of initial fuel reduction from tighter CAFE standards (Small and Van Dender 2006) Like

Policy optionsPolicy options

Policies that reduce Policies that reduce gasoline consumption gasoline consumption andand miles driven:miles driven:

Gas taxCarbon taxPay-as-you drive insurance premiums

Policies that reduce Policies that reduce gasoline consumption gasoline consumption but but increaseincrease miles driven:miles driven:Fuel economy standardsGas guzzler taxFeebates

Page 18: Policies for the Reduction of Gasoline Consumption · “Rebound effect” offsets 10 percent of initial fuel reduction from tighter CAFE standards (Small and Van Dender 2006) Like

CAFE versus the gas taxCAFE versus the gas tax

“Rebound effect” offsets 10 percent of initial fuel reduction from tighter CAFE standards (Small and Van Dender 2006)

Like gasoline, miles driven are complements to leisure (West and Williams (AER 2005))

Page 19: Policies for the Reduction of Gasoline Consumption · “Rebound effect” offsets 10 percent of initial fuel reduction from tighter CAFE standards (Small and Van Dender 2006) Like

Distributional Effects Distributional Effects

Gasoline tax is regressive, but:

Behavioral effects make tax significantly less regressive (West (JPubE (2004), West and Williams (JEEM (2005))Simple revenue rebate scheme can entirely offset regressivity(West and Williams (JEEM (2005))

CAFE standardsLikely to be progressive on consumer sideEffect on workers?

Page 20: Policies for the Reduction of Gasoline Consumption · “Rebound effect” offsets 10 percent of initial fuel reduction from tighter CAFE standards (Small and Van Dender 2006) Like

CAFE versus gas taxCAFE versus gas taxCAFE standard has major downside

Recent changes in CAFE good move

Potential for failures in market for fuel economy

Need policies that reduce miles driven

Gasoline tax increase administratively simple

Page 21: Policies for the Reduction of Gasoline Consumption · “Rebound effect” offsets 10 percent of initial fuel reduction from tighter CAFE standards (Small and Van Dender 2006) Like

Carbon tax or tradable permitsCarbon tax or tradable permits

Carbon tax or cap-and-trade alone do not internalize all externalities from driving

Carbon tax or cap-and-trade plus congestion pricing attractive

Regional variation in external costs of driving means gas tax should also varyCarbon tax everywhere, congestion pricing only where congestion is present

Page 22: Policies for the Reduction of Gasoline Consumption · “Rebound effect” offsets 10 percent of initial fuel reduction from tighter CAFE standards (Small and Van Dender 2006) Like

New research directionsNew research directions

The effect of gasoline price on fuel economy

West (working paper 2007) Effect of gas price on probability of buying SUV, truck, van, carUsing only contemporaneous price significantly underestimates effect of gas price on vehicle choice

Sallee and West (work in progress)Effect of gasoline prices on new vehicles’ pricesThreshold and duration effects, asymmetriesDealer-level new vehicle transactions, weekly gas prices by city

Page 23: Policies for the Reduction of Gasoline Consumption · “Rebound effect” offsets 10 percent of initial fuel reduction from tighter CAFE standards (Small and Van Dender 2006) Like

New research directionsNew research directionsEthanol demand: Anderson (2007) http://www-personal.umich.edu/~sorenta/

Data from Minnesota

Consumers substitute very easy between fuels

Simulates adoption of national ethanol standard:

Average consumer is willing to pay a small premium for ethanol

This reduces cost of a moderate ethanol content standard

Policy remains quite expensive: Implied cost per gallon of gasoline saved or ton of carbon emissions avoided far in excess of marginal external damages.