policies for energy systems transformations – chapter 22 mark jaccard simon fraser university,...
TRANSCRIPT
Policies for Energy Systems Transformations – Chapter 22
Mark JaccardSimon Fraser University, Vancouver
www.markjaccard.com / twitter @MarkJaccard
www.globalenergyassessment.org© GEA 2012 2www.globalenergyassessment.org© GEA 2012
GEA’s multiple policy objectives
Ensuring energy access for all - accelerating access in developing countries
Responding to environmental impacts and risks – minimizing environmental effects and reconciling local versus global environmental objectives
Enhancing energy security – managing energy-related risks of geopolitics, technological failures, natural disasters, and market volatility
Addressing market power – regulating or managing natural monopoly (grids and pipelines) and preventing undue market influence (oil, electricity)
Managing energy endowments – benefitting current and future generations by efficiently developing valuable resources, preventing corrupt forms of rent-seeking, and husbanding resources or the wealth they generate
2
www.globalenergyassessment.org© GEA 2012 3www.globalenergyassessment.org© GEA 2012
GEA focus on access and environment
GEA focus on energy access and cleaner energy requires significant:
material development – technologies, infrastructure, buildings, urban form, non-urban land-uses
human development – capacity building in education, law, finance, communication, planning, and governance
Almost all GEA chapters include specific policies for material and human development in their respective fields (transportation, urban areas, buildings, renewables, financing clean energy, system operation, etc.).
Chapter 22 includes a listing of policies, as well as providing policy portfolios that link to the GEA scenarios.
Specific policy chapters address energy access (ch.23), technology innovation (ch.24), and capacity development (ch.25)
3
www.globalenergyassessment.org© GEA 2012 4www.globalenergyassessment.org© GEA 2012
The access-environment challenge
4
China energy access path
OECD must reduce energy use and transform to zero carbon pollution
www.globalenergyassessment.org© GEA 2012 5www.globalenergyassessment.org© GEA 2012
China’s electricity: access + CO2
5
200 million without electricity
Electricity access almost universal
(carbon pollution x 4)projected
www.globalenergyassessment.org© GEA 2012 6www.globalenergyassessment.org© GEA 2012
Policies for cleaner energy access
Integrate energy development within socio-economic development - poverty alleviation, human capacity building, rural development, etc.
Reduce / remove subsidies to fossil fuel development and combustion.
Direct energy-related subsidies to lowest income groups, especially for efficient, low emission devices (stoves) – equipment is key.
Build-in energy efficiency / renewables with new infrastructure, buildings, energy systems (cogen., micro-grids), public transit, and urban form.
Improve attractiveness for domestic and foreign energy investments via transparency and stability of legal-financial-regulatory system.
Link international efforts to reduce greenhouse gases with mechanisms to incentivize zero-emission technologies and fuels in developing countries (CDM, tax transfers, sectoral agreements, linked cap-and-trade)
6
www.globalenergyassessment.org© GEA 2012 7www.globalenergyassessment.org© GEA 2012
Evaluating policies for CO2 reduction
Policy performance depends on trade-off between four criteria:Emission reduction effectivenessEconomic efficiencyPolitical acceptability (including perceptions of fairness)Administrative feasibility
Categories of policies include:Inducing voluntary action (labels, education, ads, training)Subsidies (grants, low-interest loans, tax credits)Standards (prescriptive and detailed, performance-based)Pricing (taxes, cap-and-trade)
7
Compulsory policies
www.globalenergyassessment.org© GEA 2012 8www.globalenergyassessment.org© GEA 2012
Compulsory policies essential
8
climate policy
non-compulsorycompulsory
standards emissions pricing
carbon taxcap-and-trade
- information- labels- subsidies
Any of these can be designed to be effective
These alone cannot
www.globalenergyassessment.org© GEA 2012 9www.globalenergyassessment.org© GEA 2012
Lessons from the climate policy trenches
Climate policy is inherently difficult:Fossil fuels plentiful and low cost with continuous innovationVested interests delude themselves and others about climate sciencePolitical systems rarely reward long-term focusNeed global action but lack effective global governance institutionsPublic concern inevitably fluctuates, and likewise political motivation
Policy advisors need to understand and respond to these monumental constraints.
Following are some suggestions for climate policy-making.
9
www.globalenergyassessment.org© GEA 2012 10www.globalenergyassessment.org© GEA 2012
Suggestions for climate policy-making - 1
Avoid proposals that require a rational model of policy-making.- real-world policy-making is fragmented and chaotic(transport, electricity, industrial policy, trade, urban development)- must seize policy windows quickly!
Assume politicians will avoid compulsory policies- “subsidies and information for efficiency is sufficient”- “renewables will outcompete fossil fuels”- “behavioral change by individuals and groups is the answer”- “corporation social responsibility is the answer”- “we’ll wait for global action!”
10
www.globalenergyassessment.org© GEA 2012 11www.globalenergyassessment.org© GEA 2012
Suggestions for climate policy-making - 2
Understand that politicians must focus on political acceptability- don’t argue that only one type of compulsory policy is valid- instead, design regulations or cap-and-trade for economic efficiency
Pay attention to the likely staying power of policies- cap-and-trade creates supportive constituency (brokers, traders)- RPS or FIT creates supportive constituency (renewable suppliers)- legislate schedule for medium term rising emissions price or decreasing cap, with eventual room for adjustment - revenue-neutral carbon tax constrains future politicians from tax cut- develop trusted institutions to sustain policy effort (California)
The issue of global action- appearance as important as reality in terms of trade effects- voluntarily negotiated agreement unlikely – need leaders and sometimes forceful mechanisms (perhaps trade measures)
11
Chapter 22: Lead AuthorsLawrence Agbemabiese (UNEP)Christian Azar (Chalmers University of Technology, Sweden)Adilson de Oliveira (Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil)Carolyn Fischer (Resources for the Future, USA)Brian Fisher (BAEconomics, Australia)Alison Hughes (University of Cape Town, South Africa)Michael Ohadi (University of Maryland, USA)Kenji Yamaji (University of Tokyo, Japan)Xiliang Zhang (Tsinghua University, China)