polarization integration

49
Conference on Computational Physics, Los Angeles, 2005 http://www.physics.rutgers.edu/~dhv/talks/ccp05.pdf Polarization, electric fields, and dielectric response in insulators David Vanderbilt Rutgers University

Upload: seaee

Post on 12-Mar-2015

114 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Polarization Integration

Conference on Computational Physics, Los Angeles, 2005http://www.physics.rutgers.edu/~dhv/talks/ccp05.pdf

Polarization, electric fields, anddielectric response in insulators

David VanderbiltRutgers University

Page 2: Polarization Integration

Conference on Computational Physics, Los Angeles, 2005http://www.physics.rutgers.edu/~dhv/talks/ccp05.pdf

Outline

• Introduction• Electric polarization

– What is the problem?– What is the solution?

• Electric fields– What is the problem?– What is the solution?

• Localized description:– Wannier functions

• Dielectric and piezoelectric properties– Systematic treatment of E-fields and strains– Mapping energy vs. polarization

• Summary and prospects

Page 3: Polarization Integration

Conference on Computational Physics, Los Angeles, 2005http://www.physics.rutgers.edu/~dhv/talks/ccp05.pdf

Principal Contributors:D. King-Smith PolarizationN. Marzari Wannier functionsR. NunesI. SouzaJ. IniguezN. SaiO. DieguezK. RabeX. WuD. HamannX. Wang DFPT in presence of E-field

Collaborators

Electric fields

Mapping E vs. P

Systematic DFPT in E and strain

Page 4: Polarization Integration

Conference on Computational Physics, Los Angeles, 2005http://www.physics.rutgers.edu/~dhv/talks/ccp05.pdf

Principal References

• Polarization– R.D. King-Smith and D. Vanderbilt, Phys. Rev. B 47, 1651 (1993).

• Review on polarization– R. Resta, Rev. Mod. Phys. 66, 899 (1994).

• Dynamics of polarization– I. Souza, J. Iniguez and D. Vanderbilt, Phys. Rev. B 69, 085106 (2004).

• Finite electric field– R.W. Nunes and X. Gonze, Phys. Rev. B 63, 155107 (2001).– I. Souza, J. Iniguez and D. Vanderbilt, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 117602 (2002).– P. Umari and A. Pasquarello, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 157602 (2002).

• DFPT in E-field– X. Wang and D. Vanderbilt, in preparation.

• Mapping energy vs. polarization– N. Sai, K.M. Rabe, and D. Vanderbilt, Phys. Rev. B 66, 104108 (2002).– O. Dieguez and D. Vanderbilt, in preparation.

• Systematic DFPT for E-fields and strain– X. Wu, D. Vanderbilt, and D.R. Hamann, submitted to Physical Review B.– D.R. Hamann, X. Wu, K.M. Rabe, and D. Vanderbilt, and, Phys. Rev. B. 71, 035117 (2005).

Page 5: Polarization Integration

Conference on Computational Physics, Los Angeles, 2005http://www.physics.rutgers.edu/~dhv/talks/ccp05.pdf

Introduction

• Context: DFT (density functional theory)• By mid-1990s, linear-response (DFPT)

allowed calculation of:– Response of P to any perturbation– Response of anything to E-field perturbation

• However, it was not known how to:– Calculate P itself– Treat finite E-fields

Page 6: Polarization Integration

Conference on Computational Physics, Los Angeles, 2005http://www.physics.rutgers.edu/~dhv/talks/ccp05.pdf

Introduction

• Solutions of these problems are now in hand– Modern theory of polarization (1993)– Treatment of finite E-fields (2002)

• Allows routine calculation of non-linear dielectric,piezoelectric properties of complex materials

This talk:

Emphasis is on methods!

Touch only very briefly onapplications

Page 7: Polarization Integration

Conference on Computational Physics, Los Angeles, 2005http://www.physics.rutgers.edu/~dhv/talks/ccp05.pdf

• Electric polarization:P = d / volume

• How to define as a bulk quantity?a) P = dsample / Vsample ?b) P = dcell / Vcell ?c) P µ Snk ·ynk˙r˙ynkÒ ?

Theory of electric polarization

Page 8: Polarization Integration

Conference on Computational Physics, Los Angeles, 2005http://www.physics.rutgers.edu/~dhv/talks/ccp05.pdf

P = dsample / Vsample ?

+s-s

DP = ( L2 s ) . L / L3

L x L x L sample:

Page 9: Polarization Integration

Conference on Computational Physics, Los Angeles, 2005http://www.physics.rutgers.edu/~dhv/talks/ccp05.pdf

• Electric polarization:P = d / volume

• How to define as a bulk quantity?a) P = dsample / Vsample ?b) P = dcell / Vcell ?c) P µ Snk ·ynk˙r˙ynkÒ ?

Theory of electric polarization

Page 10: Polarization Integration

Conference on Computational Physics, Los Angeles, 2005http://www.physics.rutgers.edu/~dhv/talks/ccp05.pdf

P = dcell / Vcell ?

+–

+–

+–

+–

+–

+–

• Textbook picture(Claussius-Mossotti)

• But does not correspondto reality!

Page 11: Polarization Integration

Ferroelectric PbTiO3 (Courtesy N. Marzari)

Page 12: Polarization Integration

Conference on Computational Physics, Los Angeles, 2005http://www.physics.rutgers.edu/~dhv/talks/ccp05.pdf

P = dcell / Vcell ?

dcell = 0

Page 13: Polarization Integration

Conference on Computational Physics, Los Angeles, 2005http://www.physics.rutgers.edu/~dhv/talks/ccp05.pdf

P = dcell / Vcell ?

dcell =

Page 14: Polarization Integration

Conference on Computational Physics, Los Angeles, 2005http://www.physics.rutgers.edu/~dhv/talks/ccp05.pdf

P = dcell / Vcell ?

dcell =

Page 15: Polarization Integration

Conference on Computational Physics, Los Angeles, 2005http://www.physics.rutgers.edu/~dhv/talks/ccp05.pdf

• Electric polarization:P = d / volume

• How to define as a bulk quantity?a) P = dsample / Vsample ?b) P = dcell / Vcell ?c) P µ Snk ·ynk˙r˙ynkÒ ?

Theory of electric polarization

Page 16: Polarization Integration

Conference on Computational Physics, Los Angeles, 2005http://www.physics.rutgers.edu/~dhv/talks/ccp05.pdf

• Electric polarization:P = d / volume

• How to define as a bulk quantity?a) P = dsample / Vsample ?b) P = dcell / Vcell ?c) P µ Snk ·ynk˙r˙ynkÒ ?

Theory of electric polarization

Page 17: Polarization Integration

Conference on Computational Physics, Los Angeles, 2005http://www.physics.rutgers.edu/~dhv/talks/ccp05.pdf

• Electric polarization:P = d / volume

• How to define as a bulk quantity?a) P = dsample / Vsample ?b) P = dcell / Vcell ?c) P µ Snk ·ynk˙r˙ynkÒ ?d) P µ Snk ·unk˙i—k˙unkÒ ?

Theory of electric polarization

Page 18: Polarization Integration

Conference on Computational Physics, Los Angeles, 2005http://www.physics.rutgers.edu/~dhv/talks/ccp05.pdf

Attempt 4

Page 19: Polarization Integration

Conference on Computational Physics, Los Angeles, 2005http://www.physics.rutgers.edu/~dhv/talks/ccp05.pdf

Page 20: Polarization Integration

Conference on Computational Physics, Los Angeles, 2005http://www.physics.rutgers.edu/~dhv/talks/ccp05.pdf

Simplify: 1 band, 1D

Page 21: Polarization Integration

Conference on Computational Physics, Los Angeles, 2005http://www.physics.rutgers.edu/~dhv/talks/ccp05.pdf

Discrete sampling of k-space

Page 22: Polarization Integration

Conference on Computational Physics, Los Angeles, 2005http://www.physics.rutgers.edu/~dhv/talks/ccp05.pdf

Gauge invariance

Page 23: Polarization Integration

Conference on Computational Physics, Los Angeles, 2005http://www.physics.rutgers.edu/~dhv/talks/ccp05.pdf

Discretized formula in 3D

where

Page 24: Polarization Integration

Conference on Computational Physics, Los Angeles, 2005http://www.physics.rutgers.edu/~dhv/talks/ccp05.pdf

Sample Application: Born Z*

Paraelectric Ferroelectric

+2 e ?

+4 e ?

– 2 e ?

– 2 e ?

Page 25: Polarization Integration

Conference on Computational Physics, Los Angeles, 2005http://www.physics.rutgers.edu/~dhv/talks/ccp05.pdf

Outline

• Introduction• Electric polarization

– What is the problem?– What is the solution?

• Electric fields– What is the problem?– What is the solution?

• Localized description:– Wannier functions

• Dielectric and piezoelectric properties– Mapping energy vs. polarization– Systematic treatment of E-fields and strains

• Summary and prospects

Page 26: Polarization Integration

Conference on Computational Physics, Los Angeles, 2005http://www.physics.rutgers.edu/~dhv/talks/ccp05.pdf

Electric Fields: The Problem

Easy to do in practice:

For small E-fields, tZener >> tUniverse ; is it OK?

But ill-defined in principle:Zener

tunneling

Page 27: Polarization Integration

Conference on Computational Physics, Los Angeles, 2005http://www.physics.rutgers.edu/~dhv/talks/ccp05.pdf

Electric Fields: The Problem

• is not periodic• Bloch’s theorem does not apply• acts as singular perturbation

on eigenfunctions• not bounded from below• There is no ground state

y(x) is verymessy

Page 28: Polarization Integration

Conference on Computational Physics, Los Angeles, 2005http://www.physics.rutgers.edu/~dhv/talks/ccp05.pdf

Electric Fields: The Solution

• Seek long-lived resonance• Described by Bloch functions• Minimizing the electric enthalpy functional

(Nunes and Gonze, 2001)

Usual EKS

Berry phase polarization

• Justification?

Page 29: Polarization Integration

Conference on Computational Physics, Los Angeles, 2005http://www.physics.rutgers.edu/~dhv/talks/ccp05.pdf

Electric Fields: Justification

Seeklong-livedmetastable

periodicsolution

Page 30: Polarization Integration

Conference on Computational Physics, Los Angeles, 2005http://www.physics.rutgers.edu/~dhv/talks/ccp05.pdf

Electric Fields: The Hitch

• There is a hitch!• For given E-field, there is a limit on k-point sampling• Length scale LC = 1/Dk• Meaning: LC = supercell dimension

Nk = 8

Lc = 8a

• Solution: Keep Dk > 1/Lt = e/Eg

Page 31: Polarization Integration

Conference on Computational Physics, Los Angeles, 2005http://www.physics.rutgers.edu/~dhv/talks/ccp05.pdf

Sample Application: Born Z*

Can check that previous resultsfor BaTiO3 are reproduced

Page 32: Polarization Integration

Conference on Computational Physics, Los Angeles, 2005http://www.physics.rutgers.edu/~dhv/talks/ccp05.pdf

Sample Application: Born Z*

(Souza,Iniguez,and Vanderbilt,

2002)

Page 33: Polarization Integration

Conference on Computational Physics, Los Angeles, 2005http://www.physics.rutgers.edu/~dhv/talks/ccp05.pdf

Outline

• Introduction• Electric polarization

– What is the problem?– What is the solution?

• Electric fields– What is the problem?– What is the solution?

• Localized description:– Wannier functions

• Dielectric and piezoelectric properties– Mapping energy vs. polarization– Systematic treatment of E-fields and strains

• Summary and prospects

Page 34: Polarization Integration

Conference on Computational Physics, Los Angeles, 2005http://www.physics.rutgers.edu/~dhv/talks/ccp05.pdf

Wannier function representation

(Marzari andVanderbilt, 1997)

“Wannier center”

Page 35: Polarization Integration

Conference on Computational Physics, Los Angeles, 2005http://www.physics.rutgers.edu/~dhv/talks/ccp05.pdf

Mapping to Wannier centers

Wanniercenter

rn

Page 36: Polarization Integration

Conference on Computational Physics, Los Angeles, 2005http://www.physics.rutgers.edu/~dhv/talks/ccp05.pdf

Wannier dipole theorem

DP = Sion (Zione) Drion

+ Swf (– 2e) Drwf

• Exact!• Gives local description of

dielectric response!

Mapping to Wannier centers

Page 37: Polarization Integration

Ferroelectric BaTiO3 (Courtesy N. Marzari)

Page 38: Polarization Integration

Wannier functionsin a-Si

Fornari et al.

Wannier functionsin l-H2O

Silvestrelli et al.

Page 39: Polarization Integration

S. Nakhmanson et al. (W26.3 2:54pm Thursday)

Wannier analysis of PVDF polymers and copolymers

Page 40: Polarization Integration

Conference on Computational Physics, Los Angeles, 2005http://www.physics.rutgers.edu/~dhv/talks/ccp05.pdf

Outline

• Introduction• Electric polarization

– What is the problem?– What is the solution?

• Electric fields– What is the problem?– What is the solution?

• Localized description:– Wannier functions

• Dielectric and piezoelectric properties– Systematic treatment of E-fields and strains– Mapping energy vs. polarization

• Summary and prospects

Page 41: Polarization Integration

Conference on Computational Physics, Los Angeles, 2005http://www.physics.rutgers.edu/~dhv/talks/ccp05.pdf

Systematic treatment of E-fields and strain

We identify six needed elementary tensors:

tensorricpiezoelection -Frozen

sorstrain ten Internal tensorcharge effective Dynamical

matrixconstant -Force

tnsorelasticion -Frozen

tensordielectricion -Frozen

=

=L==

=

=

j

mj

m

mn

jk

e

ZK

C

a

a

abc

These are computed within ABINIT using DFPT methods.

What are they?

(X. Wu, D. Vanderbilt, and D.R. Hamann, submitted to PRB)

Page 42: Polarization Integration

Conference on Computational Physics, Los Angeles, 2005http://www.physics.rutgers.edu/~dhv/talks/ccp05.pdf

- fieldEStrainDisplacement

-L

-L

c

-e-Z

-e

-ZK

C

- fieldE

Strain

Displacement

They are elements of “big Hessian matrix”

Page 43: Polarization Integration

Conference on Computational Physics, Los Angeles, 2005http://www.physics.rutgers.edu/~dhv/talks/ccp05.pdf

Elementary Tensors

Build from

Relaxed-ion tensors

To

j

mj

m

jk

mn

e

Z

C

K

a

a

abc

L j

jk

e

C

a

abc

Page 44: Polarization Integration

Conference on Computational Physics, Los Angeles, 2005http://www.physics.rutgers.edu/~dhv/talks/ccp05.pdf

)()(

)(

)(

)(

)()()(

)(

)()()(

)(

)(

)(

,,

es

aa

a

a

b

h

aba

b

s

aba

a

e

a

hh

baab

s

ab

b

h

aba

e

aab

s

b

b

eb

cc

b

c

jj

j

j

jj

jj

kjkj

jkjk

kjkj

kjjk

D

jk

S

dk

eh

dg

eSd

CS

eCe

eeCC

=

=

=

=

=

=

+=

+=

-

-

-

1

1

1

jjkcompute toe C ion relaxed Use

Elastic tensor at fixed D

Free-stress dielectric tensor

Elastic compliance tensor

Inverse dielectric tensor

Various piezoelectric tensors

Electromechanical coupling

Page 45: Polarization Integration

Conference on Computational Physics, Los Angeles, 2005http://www.physics.rutgers.edu/~dhv/talks/ccp05.pdf

Metallic

Metallic

Short circuit boundary condition

Apply strain perturbation

Measuring stress response and get CC((ee))

4400000

0430000

0043000

000260114114

000114231144

000114144231Metallic

Metallic

Open circuit boundary condition

Apply strain perturbation

Measuring stress response and get CC((D)D)

CC((D) D) ((GPaGPa))

4400000

0400000

0040000

000242123123

000123226139

000123139226

CC((ee)) ((GPaGPa))

Elastic tensors at different elec. BC’s: ZnO

Page 46: Polarization Integration

Conference on Computational Physics, Los Angeles, 2005http://www.physics.rutgers.edu/~dhv/talks/ccp05.pdf

Outline

• Introduction• Electric polarization

– What is the problem?– What is the solution?

• Electric fields– What is the problem?– What is the solution?

• Localized description:– Wannier functions

• Dielectric and piezoelectric properties– Systematic treatment of E-fields and strains– Mapping energy vs. polarization

• Summary and prospects

Page 47: Polarization Integration

Conference on Computational Physics, Los Angeles, 2005http://www.physics.rutgers.edu/~dhv/talks/ccp05.pdf

Mapping Energy vs. Polarization

BaTiO3 (Courtesy N. Marzari)

Oswaldo Dieguez (W26.7 3:42pm Thursday)

Page 48: Polarization Integration

Conference on Computational Physics, Los Angeles, 2005http://www.physics.rutgers.edu/~dhv/talks/ccp05.pdf

Status of Implementation in Code Packages

• Electric polarization– All major codes: ABINIT, PWSCF, VASP, CPMD, SIESTA, CRYSTAL, etc.

• Electric fields– ABINIT (courtesy I. Souza, J. Iniguez, M. Veithen)

• Maximally localized Wannier functions:– Package at www.wannier.org (courtesy N. Marzari)

• Systematic treatment of E-fields and strains– ABINIT (courtesy X. Wu, D.R. Hamann, K. Rabe)

• DFPT in finite electric field– Coming to ABINIT soon (courtesy X. Wang)

• Mapping energy vs. P– Coming to ABINIT soon (courtesy O. Dieguez)

Page 49: Polarization Integration

Conference on Computational Physics, Los Angeles, 2005http://www.physics.rutgers.edu/~dhv/talks/ccp05.pdf

Summary and Prospects

• Electric polarization– Problem and solution

• Electric fields– Problem and solution

• Localized description:– Wannier functions

• Dielectric and piezoelectric properties– Mapping energy vs. polarization– Systematic treatment of E-fields and strains

• New directions:– Dynamic generalizations of Pberry

(I. Souza, Valley Prize Talk, B3.1 11:15am Monday)– DFPT in finite electric field

(X. Wang, S32.3 2:30pm Wednesday)• Many possible applications