pm final presentation

Upload: uzair-mansuri

Post on 02-Jun-2018

224 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/10/2019 PM Final Presentation

    1/23

    Team 7Rohan DeotaRazan FashhoCasey Franz

    Ju Lee HyungUzair Mansuri

    Basrah Childrens Hospital

  • 8/10/2019 PM Final Presentation

    2/23

    Background

    Risks

    Problems Timelines and Costs

    Prevention

    Recovery Lessons Learned

    Overview

  • 8/10/2019 PM Final Presentation

    3/23

    Background

    Basrah Location

    15% Children die before 5years of age

    Children suffering from preventable diseases

    Childhood Leukemia >8% prior to 2000

    Children accounted for 56% of reported Leukemiacases.

  • 8/10/2019 PM Final Presentation

    4/23

    As part of the Iraq Relief and Reconstruction Program, the UnitedStates Agency for International Development (USAID) was taskedwith constructing a State of the Art 50-bed pediatric hospital in

    Basrah, Iraq.

    Background

  • 8/10/2019 PM Final Presentation

    5/23

    Congress authorized $50 million to be spent for project from IraqRelief and Reconstruction Fund by USAID. (November 2003)

    USAID and Project HOPE had Memorandum of Understanding

    (MOU) where Project HOPE would take lead in providing asignificant portion of the hospital equipment and have responsibilityfor training medical and administrative staff. (January 2004)

    USAID awards Bechtel National Incorporated with a design-buildcontract that required the hospital to be completed by December 31,2005 (October 2004)

    July 2005, the design changed to a 94-bed facility including anoncology center at request of Iraqi Ministry of Health

    Background

  • 8/10/2019 PM Final Presentation

    6/23

    Natural: Earthquakes, Termites MitigationStructural Design

    Location: Insufficient Water, Sewage Systems MitigationAdditional water system inlets, new gravity

    conveyance sewage system

    People: Hostility, Rebels MitigationSecurity Personnel

    Risks

  • 8/10/2019 PM Final Presentation

    7/23

    April 2005 USAID reports completion date to be May 31, 2006 (originally

    December 31, 2005)

    October 2005 USAID reports completion date to be October 31, 2006

    March 2006 Bechtel reports completion date to be July 31, 2007 with an

    estimated cost of $98 million (originally $50 million)

    July 2006 Special Inspector General for the Iraq Reconstruction (SIGIR)

    audited the project and found that USAID had insufficientoversight, inadequate accounting systems, and that they failed toreport the increasing budget to congress.

    SIGIR estimated cost of project to be at least $149.5 million

    TimelineProblem Signs

  • 8/10/2019 PM Final Presentation

    8/23

    Problem Signs Bechtels in depth analysis submitted in 2005,

    though BCH consideration was in 2004. Thorough technical feasibilityanalysis was not done

    Error in basic engineering design. (water availability, seismicdesign, pumping stations in parallel)

    Unrealistic timeframefor design and constructionBasrah Childrens Hospital

    Term-Contract or fee contract

    Kadhim Hassan little to no work had been donefor months. James Glanz

  • 8/10/2019 PM Final Presentation

    9/23

    Project Changes

    June 2006 USAID issues a Stop-Work notice to Bechtel

    Program oversight transferred from USAID to the US Army

    Corps of Engineers Gulf Region Division (USACE) Project was approximately 30% complete at time of transfer

    September 2006 New contract awarded to MID Contracting with a new

    completion date of July 21, 2008

  • 8/10/2019 PM Final Presentation

    10/23

    Vendor Evaluation & Finalization Jul-04 to Oct-04

    Detail design started Oct-04

    Actual Construction started 14-Apr-05 (9 Mon ths later than JO date)

    Structural Timeline

  • 8/10/2019 PM Final Presentation

    11/23

    Seismic design did not meet standards Bechtel had to resubmit design for approval

    Soil at sight could not support building

    Bechtel added to foundation, adding 90 days to the schedule and $2.5million to budget

    Security

    By 2005, local militia and gangs had killed 24 on-site workers

    Changing Scope

    50-bed pediatric hospital100-bed facility based on oncology94-bedfacility supporting oncology and pediatrics

    Communication Multi le artners involved fundin sources

    Problems

  • 8/10/2019 PM Final Presentation

    12/23

    Lack of effective oversight No on-site project management by USAID

    Nationwide construction cost escalation 30-40% per year

    Complex chain of subcontractorsused by Bechtel

    Quality Issues

    Civil work was not ready for installation Contract work was poor (cracks in walls and floors)

    Since project was so far delayed, medical equipment providedin 2005 was not longer State of the Art

    In 2009, the hospital had to change slogan to Modern

    Problems

  • 8/10/2019 PM Final Presentation

    13/23

    USGovernment

    Project HOPE(US based

    HealthOpportunities

    PeopleEverywhere)

    USAID (USAgency

    InternationalDevelopment)

    Bechtel(original

    contractor)

    MIDCON, UHS &Hospital Design and

    Planning(HDP)

    Sub-contractors

    Departmentof State(DoS)

    Government ofSpain (GOS) UNDP (United

    NationDevelopment

    Program)

    Ministry ofHealth (MOH)

    Iraq

    USACE (GRD)

    ( US Armycorps of

    Engineers Gulfregion

    division)

    Government ofIraq(GOI) US CommandersEmergency Relief

    Program (USCERP)

    MOU

    Stakeholders/Agencies Involved

  • 8/10/2019 PM Final Presentation

    14/23

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    120

    140

    160

    180

    2004-Jun2006-Jun

    2009-May

    50

    117.4

    165.7

    TotalProjectCost($Millio

    ns)

    Duration

    Origin al Total Project Cos t: $50 m il l ion

    Project Cost

  • 8/10/2019 PM Final Presentation

    15/23

    2003 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2010

    BCH completelyinaugurated

    10/21/10

    Phase opening ofBCH started

    11/30/09

    USACE

    takingoverproject

    fromUSAID

    6/27/06

    USAID issued"Stop Work"

    6/1/06

    Initial ProjectCompletion date

    12/31/05

    JO amendmentwith official

    scope defined7/7/04

    JO released

    on Bechtel

    6/7/04

    USAID awardedcontract to

    Bechtel

    1/5/04

    Conceptualization 2003 - 2004

    Fundamental Scope Change 2004 - 2005

    Bechtel Work: (30% ProjectCompleted, 9 Months Delay with

    cost overrun)

    2004 - 2006

    8 subsequent modifications in scope 2006 - 2007

    United Nations ordering of 18 contracts in process 2007 - 2009

    Phase Opening of BCHstarted

    2009 - 2010

    1 year

    1 year

    2 year

    1 year

    2 year

    1 yr

    Project Timeline

  • 8/10/2019 PM Final Presentation

    16/23

    PMI Areas Matrices

    Level: 1 2 3 4 5

    Requirements

    Definition

    Statement of

    purpose

    Process to

    identify

    requirements

    Stakeholders

    involved in

    requirements

    Functions fully

    documented

    Incorporates

    quality

    improvement

    Deliverable

    Identification

    Names of

    deliverables

    Customer &

    management

    identify deliv.

    Detailed

    description of

    deliverable

    Consistent

    template for all

    projects

    Improvement

    in process

    Scope

    Definition

    Ad hoc, no

    standards

    Defined scope

    statement

    Assumptions

    & constraints

    clear

    Documented &

    monitored

    Project

    experience

    data used

    WBS Basic work

    components

    Third level

    template

    Jointly identify

    all tasks

    Inter-project

    dependencies

    documented

    Regularly

    monitored

    Scope Change

    Control

    Ad hoc

    communi-

    cation

    Documented

    change

    process

    Baselines

    established &

    managed

    Integrated with

    organ.s

    systems

    Lessons

    learned

    Project ScopeManagement

    Level: 1 2 3 4 5

    Activity

    Definition

    Few or no

    activities or

    milestones

    Scope

    statement,

    milestones

    Process,

    assumptions,

    constraints

    Activities

    regularly

    monitored

    Continuously

    improve

    activity defin.

    Activity

    Sequencing

    Ad hoc

    sequencing

    Process for

    precedence

    analysis

    External

    dependencies

    dependencies

    regularly

    monitored

    Improve

    dependency

    analysis

    Schedule

    Development

    No process for

    scheduling

    Process for

    scheduling

    time & costs

    Historical data

    base for

    scheduling

    Resource

    utilization

    maximized

    Improve

    networks,

    resource alloc

    Schedule

    Control

    No baseline

    control or

    reporting

    Schedule

    status, chg.

    control

    Change

    control,

    earned value

    Assess project

    efficiency

    Schedule

    performance

    analysis

    Schedule

    Integration

    Ad hoc

    grouping of

    schedules

    Manual

    grouping of

    schedules

    Organization-

    wide

    schedules

    Decisions

    across

    programs

    Lessons

    learned for

    integration

    Project TimeManagement

  • 8/10/2019 PM Final Presentation

    17/23

    Level: 1 2 3 4 5

    Resource

    Planning

    Individuals

    identify

    resource req.

    Resource

    listing defined

    Project office

    resource

    repository

    Integrated w/

    project office &

    HR

    Improve

    resource

    priorities

    Cost

    Estimating

    Scope

    statement; ad

    hoc estimates

    Top WBS,

    cost-estimate

    template

    Cost analysis

    of alternatives

    Integrated w/

    finance, acct,

    risk mgt

    Improve

    forecasting vs.

    estimates

    Cost

    Budgeting

    No established

    practice

    Baselining

    process not

    org standard

    Time phased

    estimates,

    baselines

    Integrated w/

    finance, acct,

    risk mgt

    Baseline

    lessons

    learned

    Performance

    Management

    Informal, ad

    hoc

    Summary level

    tracking

    Earned value,

    corporate

    financials

    Performance

    indices

    Measure

    efficiency &

    effectiveness

    Cost Control Non-standard

    tracking

    Periodic cost

    reports

    Variance

    analysis, est to

    complete

    Cost reports

    integrated w/

    tech reports

    Cost

    assessments,

    lessons learn

    Level: 1 2 3 4 5

    Risk

    Identification

    Risks not

    identified

    Risk

    identification

    process

    Standards for

    risk/symptom

    identification

    Integrated w/

    cost & time

    mgt, PMO

    Identify org.

    priority,

    lessons learn

    Risk

    Quantification

    Speculate on

    impact if risks

    occur

    Structured

    approach to

    rating risks

    Multiple

    criteria

    prioritization

    Integrated w/

    cost & time

    mgt, finance

    Improve

    quantification

    Risk

    Response

    Development

    Risks

    considered as

    they arise

    Informal

    strategy for

    handling risks

    Contingency

    plans

    Integrated w/

    cost & time

    mgt, PMO

    Tracking

    project

    reserves

    Risk Control Day-to-day

    problem

    solving

    Individualized

    approach to

    managing risk

    Risks routinely

    tracked

    Integrated with

    control

    systems

    Risk assess

    included in

    proj execution

    Risk Docu-

    mentation

    No historical

    database

    Some

    historical data

    Historical data

    on common

    risks

    Interdepen-

    dent risks

    betw projects

    Improve

    collection

    activity

    Project CostManagement

    Project RiskManagement

    PMI Areas Matrices

  • 8/10/2019 PM Final Presentation

    18/23

    Identification

    Scope

    Prior to Design

    Risks

    Location

    Engineering

    Financial

    Contingent Contract

    Realistic Timeframe Cost

    Contract Details

    Management

    Analysis

    Location

    Design

    Funding Allocation

    Technical and FinancialFeasibility

    Monitoring and Reporting

    Identify warning signs for

    potential problems Communication between

    stakeholders

    Prevention

  • 8/10/2019 PM Final Presentation

    19/23

    Evaluate/Audit Project

    Problem areas and flaws

    Review objectives and assumptions

    Feasibility

    Must have versus would like to have

    Determine Tradeoffs

    Urgent changes

    Cost Effective changes

    Feasible changes

    Revise Goals

    Change deliverables

    Update WBS

    Incorporate customers/stakeholders

    Recovery

  • 8/10/2019 PM Final Presentation

    20/23

    Technical feasibility of basic design and approval of those prior to startof work

    Project timeframe should be evaluated and should be realistic

    Evaluate risks and their impact on scheduling and cost

    Ensure availability of resources required for the project and site surveyfor understanding the suitability of surrounding.

    Baseline scheduling, monitoring and reporting for warning signs inproject

    Designated project team with project manager coordinating betweendifferent agencies and taking the accountability of the project progress

    Lessons Learned

  • 8/10/2019 PM Final Presentation

    21/23

    Have personnel for on-site management and project oversight

    Identification and implementation of control process.

    Define a specific communication protocol for stakeholders withthe project management team

    Cost estimation and cash flow to be organized and distributedover the project life cycle

    Understand different local governments budgeting process

    Progress status reporting at regular intervals of time

    Lessons Learned

  • 8/10/2019 PM Final Presentation

    22/23

    Works Cited"Al Basra Children Hospital Historical Records"Enr. Construction.com. N.p., n.d. Web. 10 Apr. 2013.

    Basrah Childrens Hospital Basrah, Iraq. Special Inspector General for Iraq Reconstruction (SIGIR) Report. PA-08-160. 28 July 2009.

    Glanz, James. "SERIES OF WOES MAR IRAQ PROJECT HAILED AS MODEL." The New York Times. The New York

    Times, 28 July 2006. Web. 10 Apr. 2013.

    Kerzner, Harold. Recovery Project Management: Techniques and Tactics for Reversing Failing Projects. InternationalInstitute for Leaning, Inc. www.iil.com. Web. 10 April 2013.

    Rageh, Rawya. "Iraq Hospital Touted by Laura Bush Delayed." The Washington Post. N.p., 28 July 2006. Web. 10 Apr.

    2013.

    Review of the US Agency for International Developments Management of the Basrah Childrens Hospital Project.Special Inspector General for Iraq Reconstruction (SIGIR) Report. SGIR-06-026. 31 July 2006.

    Photos: http://www.fayeandsteve.com/Basrah%20Children's%20Hospital.htm, http://www.army.mil/article/47156

    http://www.fayeandsteve.com/Basrah%20Children's%20Hospital.htmhttp://www.army.mil/article/47156http://www.army.mil/article/47156http://www.fayeandsteve.com/Basrah%20Children's%20Hospital.htm
  • 8/10/2019 PM Final Presentation

    23/23

    Questions