plant life management and r&d activities in japan … · plant life management and r&d...
TRANSCRIPT
Plant Life Management and R&D Activities in Japan
after the Fukushima Daiichi Accident
Prof. Naoto Sekimura, Dr.
Vice President
Professor, Department of Nuclear Engineering and Management
The University of Tokyo
Associate Member of Science Council of Japan
Chairperson, Nuclear Reactor Safety Examination Committee, NRA Japan
Chairperson, Nuclear Safety Division
Chairperson, Nuclear Standard Committee
Atomic Energy Society of Japan
October 25, 2017
PLiM 2017, Lyon
Contents
1. Introduction
• Current Status of Nuclear Power Policy and NPPs in Japan
• Change in Regulatory Requirements
2. Ageing Management and Long Term Operation of NPPs
• Issues and Projects on Materials and Their Systems
• Decommissioning of Fukushima Daiichi NPPs
• Materials and Components from Decommissioning Reactors
3. Future R&D and Collaboration
• Research Roadmap
• Future International Collaboration
4. Summary
2
Current Status of Strategic Energy Plan in Japan
� 4th Strategic Energy Plan has been determined by the
Government on April 11, 2014, to provide basic lines
of energy policy for these 20 years.
� “Nuclear power is an important baseload
electricity source.”
� Long Term Plan on April 27, 2015
� Contribution of nuclear power in 2030
: 20-22% of total electricity source
� Operation of more than 30 nuclear reactors in Japan
� Long term operation
� Possible replacements3
Situations Surrounding the Use of Nuclear Power in Japan
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2025 2030 2050
Interim Storage
Reprocessing
MOX Fuel Processing
Fast Reactors
Electric Market Reform
Nuclear Power
Ov
ers
ea
s
Nu
cle
aP
ow
er
Nuclear Fuel
Cycle
Fukushima Daiichi
New RegulatoryRequirements
Related to Climate Change
Voluntary Efforts
to Improve Safety
Decommissioning
Strategic Energy Plan
Jap
an
New Regulatory
Standards
(July 8, 2013)
Accident at Fukushima Daiichi
Nuclear Power Station
(March 11, 2011)
Fuel Debris Removal
Completion of the Decommission
Mutsu Interim Storage Facility
Rokkasho MOX Fuel Processing Plant
Full Retail Competition
Legal Unbundling of Transmission and Distribution Sectors
Practical application of fast reactors
2nd commitment period of the Kyoto Protocol
Establishment of the Organization for Cross Regional Coordinationof Transmission Operators
Greenhouse gas reduction
Whole world: half
Developed counties: >80%
Rokkasho Reprocessing Plant
Practical Application of
Fast Reactors
Restart
Decommissioning of Reactors
Safety Improvement Evaluation
Submitting Intended Nationally Determined Contribution before COP 21
Total capacity of nuclear Power in the world :to grow by about 10 to 90% by 2030 about 10 to 190% by 2050 (IAEA)
and by about 60% by 2040 (IEA)
Establishment of Japan Nuclear Safety Institute (JANSI) (Nov. 15, 2012)
Proposals for Voluntary and Continuous Improvement of Nuclear Safety (May 30, 2014)
Establishment of Nuclear Risk Research Center (NRRC) (Oct. 1, 2014)
Basic line of Energy policy with a view to an energy supply-demand Structure for the Mid to Longterm (20 years)- - -4th Strategic Energy Plan (April 11, 2014)
Establishment of a Proper Risk Governance Framework
4
The NRA (Nuclear Regulatory Authority) implements new regulatory
systems stipulated in the amended Nuclear Regulation Act ;
�Regulation taking severe accidents into consideration
• Legally request severe accident measures to the licensees
� Introduction of back-fitting system : Regulation applying latest scientific/technical knowledge on safety issues to existing facilities
• Apply new technical requirements to existing licensed nuclear facilities as a legal obligation
� An operation limit of 40 years to deal with aged reactors
• As an exception, extension (<20 years) will be approved, only whencompliance with the regulatory standards by the Government Order is confirmed.
� Special safety regulation in Fukushima Daiichi site
New Nuclear Regulation Systems in Japan Became Effective from July 8, 2013
5
6
Prevention of Core Damage
Seismic/Tsunami Resistance
Natural phenomena
<Previous Requirements>
Reliability of power supply
Function of other SCCs
Ultimate heat sink
Fire protection
Seismic/Tsunami resistance
Ultimate Heat Sink
Fire Protection
Function of other SCCs
Reliability of Components
Natural Phenomena
Prevention of CV Failure
Suppression of Release of Radioactive Materials
Specialized Safety Facility
Reliability of components Reliability of Power Supply
<Current Requirements>
Re
info
rce
dS
ev
ere
Acc
ide
nt
Me
asu
res
(Ne
w)
Re
info
rce
d
3rd Layer of DiD
Requirements for Beyond DBA
4th Layer of DiD
Current Regulatory Requirements in Japan
6
7
Regulatory Systems for Inspection, Periodic Safety Reviewand Ageing Management in Japan
Evaluation of Safety Improvements (Strengthened Periodic Safety Review)
5 Years 5 Years5 Years5 Years
Ageing Management Technical Evaluation (AMTE)before 30 years for Continued Operation
30 Years 10 Years 10 Years
Back Fitting / Regulatory Inspection (ROP)
Start of Commercial Operation
7
10 Years
40 Years
5 Years 5 Years5 Years5 Years
Re-evaluation Every 10 Years
Extended Operation Period
5 Years
Extension can be approved only once up to 60 yeas
8
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010
BWR : 22 unitsPWR : 20 units
Decommissioning BWR
1F-1
1F-2 1F-3 1F-51F-4
1F-6
1F : Fukushima-Daiichi
H : Hamaoka
M : MihamaGCR ATR
H-1
H-2
Tsuruga-1
M-1
M-2
Shimane-1
Genkai-1 Ikata-1
Current Status of Nuclear Power Plants in Japan
Start of Commercial Operation
Ele
ctri
cal
Ou
tpu
t (M
We
)
Decommissioning PWR
8
Sendai-1 Sendai-2 Ikata-3
Takahama-3,4
Takahama
Mihama
Ohi
DecommissioningUnit 1
Unit 1
Unit 1
Unit 2
Unit 2
Unit 2
Unit 3
Unit 3
Unit 3
Unit 4
Unit 4
30 years 40 years
2017
Status of PWRs in KEPCO
Beyond 40 years of operation
Under operation
Re-starting very soon
9
826MWe
826MWe
826MWe
340MWe
500MWe
870MWe
870MWe
1180MWe
1180MWe
1175MWe
1175MWe
� Special Inspections are required in addition to;
• Meet new regulatory requirements
• Ageing Management Technical Evaluation for every 10 years
and Maintenance Program
Special Additional Inspectionsfor Long Term Operation beyond 40 years up to 60 years
Regulatory Requirements of Special Additional Inspections
Components Current Inspection Additional Inspection
Reactor Pressure VesselUltrasonic Tests of
Welded Zone
100% UT Examination of Base
Metal in addition to Welded Zone
Primary Containment Vessel (Steel) Leak Rate Tests
Visual Test
(Appearance of coating film)
Civil Concrete Structure Visual Tests & NDT
Core Sampling
(Strength, Neutralization, Salt
intrusion, etc.) 10
RCS pipe nozzle corner
Core region of RPV
Safe end dissimilar metal joint
RPV head nozzle
UT (base metal)
VTDirect visual inspection from penetration OD
ECT (cladding)
UT (welds)
UT (base metal/welds)
SCC in 600 series Ni-base alloy →Replacement of RV head
SCC in 600 series Ni-base alloy → Apply Water Jet Peening (WJP)
UT (dissimilar metal joint)
Leak test
Special Additional Inspection of Pressure Vessel
BMI nozzle
Nozzle ID: ECTWelds: VT
(video camera)
Blue character ; Routine inspectionRed character; Special additional inspection
11
FY 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Takahama
1 & 2
Mihama
3・Reinforcement of SFP & SFP Re-racking
・Fire Protection Measures
・Replacement of Core Internals
・Replacement of Main Control Panels, etc.
・Installation of CV Upper Shielding
・Fire Protection Measures
・Replacement of Main Control Panels
・Relocation of Seawater Pipes in unit 2, etc.
Safety screening review
against new regulatory
requirements
Review on extension of
operation period
Special
inspection
▼6/20 Approved
▼4/20 Approval of change in reactor installation license
▼6/10 Approval of construction plan
Additional Safety Measures
Pre
-serv
ice in
spectio
n
Resta
rt
Safety screening review
against new regulatory
requirements
Review on extension of
operation period
Special
inspection
▼11/16 Approved
▼10/5 Approval of change in reactor installation license
▼10/26 Approval of construction plan
Additional Safety Measures for Extended Operation
Pre
-serv
ice in
spectio
n
Resta
rt
Additional Safety Measures
12
Pressurizer
Reactor vessel
Concrete structures
Steam generator
Steam GeneratorIn response to the SG tube rupture accident at Mihama 2,
all the SG tubes were replaced with corrosion-resistant material tubes.Takahama 1: FY ‘95-’96, Takahama 2: FY ‘93-’94
Upper Head of RPV It was replaced as the preventive
maintenance against SCC at the upper head nozzle.Takahama 1: FY ‘95-’96Takahama 2: FY ‘96-’97
Refueling water storage tankIt was replaced as the long term maintenance
measure against chlorine type SCC caused by sea salt particles.
Takahama 1: FY ‘04Takahama 2: FY ‘03
CondenserThe tubes were replaced with corrosion resistant titanium tubes to prevent possible sea water leak.
Takahama 1: FY ‘02Takahama 2: FY ‘03
Feed water pump
High pressure feed water heaterThe tubes were replaced with the stainless steel tubes to
improve water quality in the SG. Takahama 1: FY ‘02, Takahama 2: FY ‘00/’03
Low pressure turbineIt was replaced as the preventive maintenance
against SCC at the rotor.Takahama 1: FY ‘92-’94 Takahama 2: FY ‘93-’95
Generator(replacement of stator coil)
The stator coil was replaced as the preventive maintenance against possible degraded insulation.
Takahama 1: FY ‘96Takahama 2: FY ‘93
Low pressure feed water heaterThe tubes were replaced with the stainless steel tubes to improve water quality in the SG.
Takahama 1: FY ‘02/’04Takahama 2: FY ‘03
Heavy Component Replacements in Takahama 1 & 2
KEPCO 13
Upper core
internals
Lower core
internals
・The whole core internals are replaced.
Major ImprovementsMajor Improvements
� Structural change of baffle・ Adoption of square type baffle, longer baffle former bolts, and bolts
with the under head shape modified to reduce stress, and
introduction of bolt cooling holes to lower temperatures, in order to
improve resistance to irradiation assisted SCC.
� Structural change of upper core internals・ To streamline the structure, the upper core support plate is replaced
with the steel circular plate attached to the cylindrical shell,
as adopted by the latest plant.
� Structural change of thermal shielding material・ To streamline the structure, the cylindrical type material is
replaced with the separate type, as adopted by the latest plant.
� Structural change of the radial support・ Adoption of a larger radial support improve the seismic resistance.
Replacement of Core Internals at Mihama 3
before CIR after CIR
KEPCO14
Existing main control panel Digital main control panel
New operating console
Main control panels are replaced with the state-of-the-art digital type
to improve maintainability.
Large display
Replacement of Main Control Panelsin Takahama 1, 2 and Mihama 3
KEPCO 15
Analog Digital
PWR Alliance Agreement (Oct. 19, 2016)
Western Japan 5-company Alliance
(Hokuriku, Kansai, Chugoku, Shikoku & Kyushu)
� Cooperation in the event of a nuclear disaster
� Cooperation in implementing decommissioning
measures, etc.
Mutual Cooperation between
Tokyo Electric Power HD
and Tohoku Electric Power
� Agreement on the Cooperation in
the event of a nuclear disaster
Mutual Technical Cooperation Agreement
(Hokkaido, Kansai, Shikoku, Kyushu)
� Information sharing on Voluntary
Safety Enhancement
� Cooperation to develop new
technologies for next generation light
water reactors and others
Cooperation Agreements for Nuclear Emergencies and
Continuous Improvement of Nuclear Safety Efforts
16
Nuclear EmergencySupport Center
Mutual Cooperation between Chubu, Tokyo and Hokuriku
Mutual Cooperation between Hokkaido and Tohoku
on April 22 and August 5, 2016
Code on Implementation and Review ofNuclear Power Plant Ageing Management Program
English version is
available
Atomic Energy Society of Japan (AESJ) has established the “Code on Implementation
and Review of Nuclear Power Plant Ageing Management Programs” (AESJ-SC-P005:
2008) in 2008 and continuously updated every year.
17
Major input to IAEA
IGALL knowledge-base
Proposal for
Updates
Updating Knowledge-base for Ageing Management in Japan
Operators
of NPPs
(Utilities)
Expert Meeting
from All the
Utilities (JANSI)
Academic
Society
(AESJ)
Regulator
(NRA)
Maintenance
ProgramAgeing Mechanism
Management Charts
Summary Sheets of
Ageing Mechanisms
Endorsement of
the AESJ Code
for Regulatory
Activities
Details of Inspection
and Maintenance Plan
and Activities
Additional Information
including consumables
Operational Experience
AMTE Report
Expert Meeting
Subcommittee for
Plant Life
Management
Evaluation of
Maintenance
Effectiveness Participation
Research for Ageing Management
AMTE : Ageing Management Technical Evaluation before 30 years for Continued Operation
JANSI : Japan Nuclear Safety Institute, AESJ : Atomic Energy Society of Japan
Regulatory Review
18
19
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010
BWR : 22 unitsPWR : 20 units
Decommissioning BWR
1F-1
1F-2 1F-3 1F-51F-4
1F-6
1F : Fukushima-Daiichi
H : Hamaoka
M : MihamaGCR ATR
H-1
H-2
Tsuruga-1
M-1
M-2
Shimane-1
Genkai-1 Ikata-1
Current Status of Nuclear Power Plants in Japan
Start of Commercial Operation
Ele
ctri
cal
Ou
tpu
t (M
We
)
Decommissioning PWR
19
Sendai-1 Sendai-2 Ikata-3
Takahama-3,4
Roadmap for Decommissioning of Fukushima Daiichi
20
Estimation of Fuel Debris Distribution in Units 1, 2 and 3
T. Fukuda, NDF (Nuclear Damage Compensation & Decommissioning Facilitation Corporation), presented at ICAPP2017 20
Strategy for Risk Reduction in Fukushima Daiichi
21T. Fukuda, NDF (Nuclear Damage Compensation & Decommissioning Facilitation Corporation), presented at ICAPP2017
Technical Requirements for Fuel Debris Retrieval
in Fukushima Daiichi
• Safety during Fuel Debris Retrieval Work– Establishment of Containment Function
– Maintenance of Cooling Function
– Criticality Control
– Structural Integrity of PCV and R/B
– Dose Reduction during Operation
– Work Safety
• Fuel Debris Retrieval Method– Development of Equipments/Devices
– Establishment of Access Route
– Establishment of Retrieval Systems and their Space
22T. Fukuda, NDF (Nuclear Damage Compensation & Decommissioning Facilitation Corporation), presented at ICAPP2017
23
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010
BWR : 22 unitsPWR : 20 units
Decommissioning BWR
1F-1
1F-2 1F-3 1F-51F-4
1F-6
1F : Fukushima-Daiichi
H : Hamaoka
M : MihamaGCR ATR
H-1
H-2
Tsuruga-1
M-1
M-2
Shimane-1
Genkai-1 Ikata-1
Current Status of Nuclear Power Plants in Japan
Start of Commercial Operation
Ele
ctri
cal
Ou
tpu
t (M
We
)
Decommissioning PWR
23
Sendai-1 Sendai-2 Ikata-3
Takahama-3,4
Sampling of RPV Materials and Concrete Structure
from the Decommissioning Reactors
計算精度の検証用
ストリーミング等
の影響確認用
中性子束 が 小 さい
箇所 の 計算精度を
確認 する箇所
コアボーリングで
サンプリング
(深さ
1m程度
)
911
28
4
12
3
56
7
8
16
17
1012
13
1415
18
1920
22
2 3
25 24
27 26
31
30
29
33 32
34
3635
37
39
38
44
45
4849
5153
50
52
5455
56
57
58
21
21
21
For confirming calculation
accuracy
For confirming calculation
accuracy
For confirming calculation
accuracy at locations with small
neutron flux
Sampling with core boring
(about 1m in depth)
Instrumentation nozzle
Nut
Vent
RPV top lid
Stud
Guide rod
Flange
Fuel exchanger bellows
Steam dryer
Steam separator
Feedwater inlet nozzle
CRD water return nozzle
Core spray
Shroud lower bracket
PLR water outlet nozzle
CRD guide tube
CRD penetration
Reactor internal structure schematic diagram
Core instrumentation
penetration
RPV support skirt
Support leg
Core pressure differential detector and standby liquid
injection nozzle
Support ring plate
Jet pump instrumentation nozzle
PLR water inlet nozzle
Heat insulator support
Jet pump liner
Core shroud
Shroud head
Heat insulator supportCore spray nozzle
Stabilizer bracket
Steam dryer skirt
Instrumentation nozzle
Steam outlet nozzle
Leakage detection tap
Modification approval
Oct 22, 1971
Instrumentation nozzle
Vent
Instrumentation nozzle
Target for IAEA CRP
Target-1(RPV)
Target-2(Concrete)
Target for IAEA CRP
24
Hamaoka Unit 1
Through Wall Distribution of RPV Embrittlement
Cladding
Distribution of initial T41J
Fast Neutron Fluence
Charpy shift, ΔT41J
due to irradiation
Distribution of T41J
after the irradiation
Base Metal
RPV beltline
Curve not incorporated
initial T41J distribution
(Current Surveillance)Curve with initial
distribution incorporated
Location in thickness
direction of RPV
AESJ 2017 fall meeting (C000596) September 13th, 201725
26
Operation Periods
Comprehensive Soundness Evaluation Methodon Compressive Strength of Concrete
(A-1) Core Sampling
(A-2) Nondestructive Testing
Str
en
gth
Ra
tio
(B)Analysis Results
Data from Aged Structures by Core Sampling and NDT
Cement Hydration Strength of
Concrete
Analysis Conditions of Reactor Building• Material Properties (cement, aggregates etc. )• Mix Proportion, Dimensions of Members• Operation History (temp., humidity, flux, dose rates
Strength of Cement
Paste
Data from Lab Tests
30ys 38ys10ys
(A) Data Collection from Core Sampling and NDT (C) Validation of Analysis Approach
� Core Sampling� Nondestructive Testing� Numerical Analysis Approach
� Assessment of Concrete StrengthStrength Evaluated >= Fc
(D) Comprehensive Soundness Evaluation
Aging Variation of Compressive Strength
Strength ofConcrete during
Operation
(B) Numerical Analysis Approach
Effects of Operation History
Chubu Electric Power Co., Inc. All rights reserved26
Integrity Evaluation of Concrete Structures
Material Basis Evaluation(Strength)
System Member Basis Evaluation (Stress)
Structure Basis Evaluation(Dynamic Properties)
Integrity Evaluation of Concrete Structures
Earthquake
Drying
ShrinkageDecreasing
Trend
Na
tura
l Fre
qu
en
cy
Time
Review of Materials
Properties
Evaluation of Seismic Integrity
of Structures
Microtremor Observation
Forced Vibration test
Core
Sample
Schmidt
Hammer
Strength Evaluation
(Core, NDE, etc.)
Measured>Design
Yes
No
Evaluation of Actual
Load Bearing Capacity
Evaluated>Design
Yes
No
Upgrade
Repair
Seismicity OK?
Yes
No
Upgrade
Repair
Ultra Sonic
Wave
Strength Distributions of
Member Sections
Design
Strength
Axial Forces
Shear Forces
Moments
“IAEA New Coordinated Research Project”, ORNL Meeting ( July 30, 2013) , Osamu Kontani, Kajima Corporation, 27
R&D Strategic Roadmap
for Reactor Safety Technology and Human Resource
[Long-term Objectives of the R&D Roadmap
Safety Foundation
Imp
rov
em
en
t o
f
Ris
k M
an
ag
em
en
t
Ca
pa
bil
ity
Lessons Learnt from the Fukushima Accident,
Current Technology and Human Resources
Continuous
improvement
and progress
A B C D E
Latest Knowledge
and New Findings
in Other Countries
and Related Fields
Nuclear power plants are continuously utilized
as important energy resource to fulfill 3Es,
ensuring safety with the trust from the people
Co
nti
nu
ou
s
En
ha
nce
me
nt
of
Sa
fety
Fo
un
da
tio
n
Tru
st f
rom
th
e S
oci
ety
an
d C
oe
xis
ten
ce
Inte
rna
tio
na
l
Co
op
era
tio
n &
Co
ntr
ibu
tio
n
Tech
nic
al
an
d S
oci
al
Ap
pro
ach
to
wa
rd
Tre
atm
en
t a
nd
Dis
po
sal
of
Ra
dio
act
ive
Wa
ste
s
Sharing and
expansion of
safety foundation
Energy security
Economic efficiency
Environment
3E
28
R&D Strategic Roadmap
for Reactor Safety Technology and Human Resource
Advisory Committee for
Natural Resources and Energy
AESJ’s Special Committee on
Nuclear Safety Research Roadmap
WG on Voluntary Improvement of Safety,
Technology and Human Resource
• IndustriesThe Federation of Electric Power Companies of Japan
Plant Manufacturers
• AcademiaUniversities, JAEA
• Government as observerAgency for Natural Resource and Energy in METI
• Nuclear
Regulation
Authority
(NRA)
Science Council of
Japan
Architectural
Institute of Japan
Japan Association for
Earthquake Engineering
IAEA
OECD/NEA
Organization in
Other countries
Nuclear Standards
Committee of JEA
The Public
Safety Technology and
Human Resource Roadmap
International Community
Nuclear Energy Subcommittee
METI
AESJ : Atomic Energy Society of Japan
Original Plan of
the Roadmap
Request to draft
the Roadmap
Basic Energy Plan in Japan
Positioning of Nuclear Power in Energy Policy
29
Su
b-C
om
mit
tee
Maintenance and
Plant Life Management
Review countermeasures against facility ageing based on
operational experiences and plant maintenance as well as the
challenges related to safe operation.
Safety Improvement
through DesignReview the challenges related to safety improvement through
design activities for fuels, materials, thermal hydraulics, etc.
Accident
ManagementReview the challenges related to accident management.
Earthquake Resistance
and External Events
Review the challenges related to long-term durability of
buildings and structures with taking into account external
events such as earthquakes tsunamis and external events.
Decommissioning (*)Review the challenges related to the processes of safe
decommissioning of the existing reactors and handling of large
wastes, etc.
Nuclear SecurityReview the challenges related to nuclear non-proliferation and
nuclear security as nuclear energy is widely used in
international community.
Sub-Committees in AESJ’s Special Committee on
Nuclear Safety Research Roadmap
* Technology Development related to Decommissioning of TEPCO’s Fukushima Daiichi
NPS is not included in this Roadmap. 30
Milestones in the R&D Strategic Roadmap
for Reactor Technology and Human Resources
(Medium term)
Stage 2(Medium term)
Stage 3(Long Term)
(Short term)
Stage 1(Short term)
2050 1. Innovative Technology to Reduce Risks of Nuclear Power Plant System
associated with Radiation Exposure and Release of Radioactivity
2. Innovative Technology to Reduce the Volume and Toxicity of
Radioactive Waste
3. Global Sharing Latest Knowledge and Technology on Nuclear Safety
2030
2020
1. Nuclear Power as Stable Energy Source with Cost Competitiveness
through Continuous and Risk Reduction of and Trust from the People
2. Advanced Plant Design Technology and Management for Further
Safety Improvement
3. Establishment of International Framework to Cooperation to Share
Human Resources and Technology
1. Voluntary Efforts of Operators with Prime Responsibility to Nuclear Safety and
Dialogue with all the Stakeholders
2. Effective Decision Making to Reduce Risk by both Regulator and Operators
3. Systematic and Harmonized Approach for Disaster Prevention in Japan where
Natural Disasters may induce Large Contribution of Risk
4. Sharing Lessons Learnt from the Fukushima Accident in addition to contribute
Technology Transfer and Knowledgebase for Nuclear Safety 31
Risk
ide
ntifica
tion
Ma
na
ge
me
nt
Human Resource Develop-
ment
Short-Term (S) Medium-Term (M) Long-Term (L)
Asse
ssme
nt o
f
Ex
tern
al E
ve
nt R
iskP
rev
en
tion
of A
ccide
nt P
rog
ressio
n
Comprehensive risk identification and assessment methodology for external events (SI02,SI03,SI13)
Development of systematic earthquake risk assessment framework including ground motion, tsunami, fault displacement and slope failure (SI02,SI14,SI15)
Application of countermeasures against severe accident for existing plant to advanced power plant design (MIII11,MIII12, MIV02)
Development of monitoring & observation framework for natural hazards (SI16)
Application of advanced analysis codes and evaluation tools for risk reduction of existing power plant (including large-scale disaster) (MI01, MIV01)
Development of concept of nuclear
power plant system with enhanced
accident tolerance (LI06, LI08,LII06,
LIII01)
Development of nuclear reactor instrumentation ability under severe accident conditions (SI04,SV01,SII02)
Countermeasures for severe accident (application of risk assessment, mobile equipment, training, etc.) (SI01,SI05, SII01, SIII02, SIV08, SV03)
Development of advanced drill for nuclear accident & disaster (SII01)
Development of advanced analysis codes and evaluation tools for severe accident (SI06,SIV06)
Development of advanced nuclear reactor instrumentation system under any conditions including severe accident conditions (MIII07,MIV03)
Review and reconstruction of organizational structure to cope with critical accident condition (MII03)
Updating and enhancement of monitoring & observation framework for natural
hazards
Continued efforts on research and development of risk assessment framework for rare
natural events for uncertainty reduction of predicted risk (including unidentified events)
(SI02,MI02,LI07)
Building Disaster Resilient Society
Org
an
izat
-ion
etc.
Leadership Education and Human Resource
Development for Accident Management (SII01)
Development of human resources to lead a cross-organizational role for accident and disaster management (MI03)
Development of human resources to fulfill an international role in the area of accident and disaster management (LI08)
Increase of the Human Resources who can apply Scientific Knowledge such as Natural Hazard to Nuclear safety (SII12)
Development and Continuous Attraction of Human Resources who conduct rare event researches on various large scale disasters and also have a motivation to make a contribution for Nuclear Safety (MI02,LI07)
・・・ ・・・ ・・・
Examples of the R&D Roadmap : External Risk Assessment and Severe Accident Management
32
• Change in regulatory requirements to extend the reactor operation beyond 40 years is strict enough to make decisions to shutdown some reactors before 40 years of operation.
• Additional inspection and replacement of important components are currently performed for continuous operation.
• Utilization of materials and components from decommissioning reactors in Japan is one of the major topics for international research collaboration.
• Decommissioning activities in Fukushima Daiichi site include many challenging issues on materials and their systems for many years.
• Knowledge management for all the aspects of nuclear technology can be effectively performed through the construction of Strategic Research Roadmap which includes human capacity building after the Fukushima Accident.
• Knowledge management and knowledge transfer for safety of huge complicated systems like nuclear power plants require additional basis for knowledge-base such as “Resilience”.
Summary
33
Thank you very much for your attention.
We are ready to host next PLiM conference in Japan !
See you again in PLiM 2022.
Resilience of Complex Systems
ANL/DIS-12-1 Resilience: Theory and Applications (Jan. 2012)
Relationship between Components of Resilience and Resilience-enhancing Measures
Crisis
Fu
nct
ion
ali
ty
Time
New Equilibrium
Recovery
Response
Preparedness
Mitigation
36
Resilience and Safety for Knowledge Management
SafetyAccident and
Incidents
ResilienceEveryday Actions and Outcomes –
Risks as well as Opportunities
Erik Hollnagel, “Safety-I and Safety-II” p. 148 (2014, ASHGATE Publishing)
Safety-II
Safety-I
37
Change in Safety Requirements
38
• Regulatory limit,
acceptance criteria,
margin changes:
� Decrease in the previously
proven design safety margin
� Revalidation of original design
basis (e.g., external events)
� Additional research for
justification/confirmation
38Arif Nesimi Kılıç (IAEA, Feb, 2017)
Change in DBE Spectrum
39
Design Basis
Events
Severe Accidents
Beyond Design
Basis Events
Design Basis
Events
Severe Accidents
Beyond Design
Basis Events
� New design basis or
margin for external events
� Updated PSAs
� Regulation of SAM
� “Not beyond” design basis
definition
39Arif Nesimi Kılıç (IAEA, Feb, 2017)
Additional / Reclassified Equipments
40
• Classification/Qualification and
Maintenance of SSCs:
�New design basis for external events
�SBO equipment
�Requirements for PAM
�SFP cooling/inventory equipment,
instrumentation
�Portable/stored equipment
�Permanent structures
40Arif Nesimi Kılıç (IAEA, Feb, 2017)
Cost and Schedule
• Initially, ~ € 200M / NPP unit
attributed to the measures considered
upon Fukushima accident.
– Those measures include additional tanks,
pumps, diesel generators, safety and non-
safety equipment upgrades, hydrogen re-
combiners, and emergency support
centres/teams, etc.
– They do not really include permanent
design changes (new BUUHS etc.)
4141Arif Nesimi Kılıç (IAEA, Feb, 2017)