planning noise impact study, concession 3 part of …...cambium inc. p.o. box 325 52 hunter street...

Cambium Inc.

P.O. Box 325 52 Hunter Street East, Peterborough Ontario, K9H 1G5

Telephone: (866) 217.7900 Facsimile: (705) 742.7907

cambium-inc.com

Planning Noise Impact Study, Concession 3 Part of Lot 18, Brock Road, Pickering

Cambium Reference No.: 7419-001

Prepared for: 2184107 Ontario Inc.

Noise and Vibration Impact Study, Brock Road, Pickering

2184107 Ontario Inc.

Ref. No.: 7419-001

2018-08-16

Cambium Inc. Page i

VERSION CONTROL

Revision Date Revision Description Reviewer

Initials

1.0 2018-05-22 Noise and Vibration Impact Study, Brock Road, Pickering RS Coatings

TMC

2.0 2018-08-16 Update for new site plan TMC

2.1 2018-09-10 Update Client Name TMC



Ref. No.: 7419-001

2018-08-16

Cambium Inc. Page ii

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Cambium Inc. was retained by 2184107 Ontario Inc., to complete a Noise Impact Study for the proposed mixed-

use development at Concession 3 Part of Lot 18, Brock Road, Pickering with respect to potential road noise from

Brock Road, and to potential rail noise and vibration impacts from the CP Rail line that lies north of the property.

This study was completed in response to a request by the City of Pickering for a noise and vibration study, and to

the CP rail requirements due the proposed development being within a 300 metre noise zone of influence of the

rail line. This report has confirmed that a vibration study is not required due to the site being located outside the

75 metre vibration zone of influence published by CP Rail.

Cambium Inc. assessed the impacts from the road and rail line on the proposed development based on applicable

guidelines such as the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation, and Parks document NPC-300 Environmental

Noise Guideline Stationary and Transportation Sources – Approval and Planning, the guideline document

prepared for The Railway Association of Canada and the Federation of Canadian Municipalities titled Guidelines

for New Development in Proximity to Railway Operations, and the CP Rail Principal Main Line Requirements.

Cambium Inc. collected rail traffic data from Canadian Pacific Railway to calculate noise impacts using the

Ministry of the Environmental calculation method Sound from Trains Environmental Analysis Method considering

current rail traffic volumes and estimated future volumes.

The results of the measured and calculated noise impacts were assessed against applicable guidelines to assess

the potential impact on residential dwellings.

The result of the assessment show that the combined rail and road noise impacts at the rooftop outdoor living

area exceed the 55 dBA criterion but remain below the 60 dBA limit. The assessment indicates meeting 55 dBA

is not likely to be economically feasible. Therefore, a warning clause may be provided to prospective buyers

warning them of the potential for elevated noise levels in the event that implementation of noise controls is not

feasible.

Recommendations were provided for various sound transmission class requirements for window assemblies, as

well the provision of central air conditioning for the majority of the building in order to achieve the sound level

criteria for indoor living areas, together with warning clauses to prospective buyers warning them of the potential

for elevated noise levels.



Ref. No.: 7419-001

2018-08-16

Cambium Inc. Page iii

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................................................... 1

2.0 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT ................................................................................ 2

3.0 ASSESSMENT CRITERIA ...................................................................................................................... 3 3.1 ROAD AND RAIL NOISE ......................................................................................................................... 3 3.2 RAIL VIBRATION ..................................................................................................................................... 4 3.3 ROAD VIBRATION .................................................................................................................................. 4

4.0 NOISE ASSESSMENT ............................................................................................................................ 5

5.0 DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS ........................................................................................... 6 5.1 OUTDOOR LIVING SPACES .................................................................................................................. 6 5.2 BUILDING FAÇADE NOISE IMPACTS ................................................................................................... 6

6.0 CONCLUDING COMMENTS ................................................................................................................... 8

REFERENCES

LIST OF APPENDED FIGURES

Figure 1 Site Location Map

LIST OF APPENDED TABLES

Table 1 Results Summary Table 2 STC Calculations

Table 3 Noise Control Summary

LIST OF APPENDICES

Appendix A Rail and Road Traffic Data Requests

Appendix B Steam and Ornament Outputs Appendix C Site Plan

Appendix D Noise Impact Warning Clauses



Ref. No.: 7419-001

2018-08-16

Cambium Inc. Page 1

1.0 INTRODUCTION

Cambium Inc. (Cambium) was retained by 2184107 Ontario Inc. to complete a Noise Impact Study for the

proposed new mixed-use development at Concession 3 Part of Lot 18, Brock Road, Pickering (the Site) with

respect to potential road noise from Brock Road, and to potential rail noise impacts from the CP Rail line that lies

north of the property. This study was completed in response to a request by the City of Pickering for a noise

study, and to the CP rail requirements due the proposed development being within a 300 metre noise zone of

influence of the rail line. A vibration study is not required due to the site being located outside the 75 metre

vibration zone of influence this was confirmed with CP rail staff.

Cambium assessed the impacts from the road and rail line on the proposed development based on applicable

guidelines such as the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation, and Parks (MECP) document NPC-300

Environmental Noise Guideline Stationary and Transportation Sources – Approval and Planning (Ontario Ministry

of the Environment, Conservation, and Parks, 2017), the guideline document prepared for The Railway

Association of Canada and the Federation of Canadian Municipalities titled Guidelines for New Development in

Proximity to Railway Operations (Railway Association of Canada and Federation of Canadian Municipalities,

2013), and the CP Rail Principal Main Line Requirements. (CP Rail).



Ref. No.: 7419-001

2018-08-16

Cambium Inc. Page 2

2.0 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT

The proposed development is new mixed-use development located at Concession 3 Part of Lot 18, Brock Road,

Pickering. The site includes one (1) mixed commercial and residential building at 6 floors in height total, with

underground and at grade parking. The Site fronts onto Brock Road and is adjacent to existing and proposed

residential development. Surrounding land uses are predominantly residential, with proposed commercial use

across Brock road to the west.

The CP Rail mainline is located approximately 200 metres (m) north of the Site, which runs east to west. The

nearest road crossing is an overpass of Brock Road, approximately 200 metres (m) north of the Site.

A site location plan showing nearby transportation noise sources in included as Figure 1.



Ref. No.: 7419-001

2018-08-16

Cambium Inc. Page 3

3.0 ASSESSMENT CRITERIA

3.1 ROAD AND RAIL NOISE

The criteria for acceptable levels of noise at residential developments due to road and rail traffic are provided in

the MECP’s NPC-300 guidance document. The recommended criteria for rail and road noise impacts for different

residential impacts are included in the table below.

Road and Rail Noise Criteria

Type of Space Sound Level Criteria (dBA, Leq)

07:00 to 23:00 23:00 to 07:00 Road Rail Road Rail

Outdoor Living Area 55 (combined)

- -

Living/Dining/Den Areas of Residence Indoor 45 40 45 40

Sleeping Quarters Indoor 45 40 40 35

The NPC-300 guideline defines an outdoor living area (OLA) as part of a noise sensitive land use (e.g. residential

dwelling) that is intended and designed for the quiet enjoyment of the outdoor environment, and is readily

accessible from the building. In the context of low rise developments, examples of OLAs include balconies with a

minimum depth of 4 m, terraces, and common OLAs such as shared terraces, yards, or gardens. In the case of

this development there are no balconies or terraces large enough, the OLA is defined as the shared rooftop patio.

The OLA sound levels are determined from the combination of both road and rail sources.

If the 16-hour equivalent sound level (Leq (16)) for an OLA is greater than 55 dBA and less than or equal to 60 dBA,

then noise control measures may be applied to reduce the sound level to 55 dBA, or, if noise control measures

are not applied, then prospective purchasers or tenants should be informed of potential noise concerns by a

warning clause (Type A as defined in NPC-300).

If the Leq (16) for an OLA is greater than 60 dBA, then noise control measures should be applied to reduce the

sound level to 55 dBA. In cases where noise control measures are not feasible for technical, economic, or

administrative purposes, then an excess above the 55 dBA limit is acceptable with a warning clause (Type A as

defined in NPC-300); however, excesses above 60 dBA are not acceptable.

For indoor living areas and sleeping quarters, the sound level criteria are used to determine transmission loss

requirements for the building façade based on the predicted sound level at the plane of a window. If the Leq (16)

daytime sound level in the plane of a window is less than or equal to 55 dBA, then typical façade constructions

are generally sufficient to achieve the indoor sound level criteria, and additional noise controls may not be

required. If the sound level in the plane of a window is greater than 55 dBA and less than or equal to 65 dBA,

then the dwelling should be designed with a provision for the installation of central air conditioning in the future, at



Ref. No.: 7419-001

2018-08-16

Cambium Inc. Page 4

the occupant’s discretion, and prospective purchasers or tenants should be informed of potential noise concerns

by a warning clause (Type C as defined in NPC-300).

If the daytime Leq (16) in the plane of a window is greater than 65 dBA, installation of central air conditioning should

be implemented, and prospective purchasers or tenants should be informed of potential noise concerns by a

warning clause (Type D as defined in NPC-300). Additionally, building façade components should be designed

so that the indoor sound level criterion can be achieved when doors and windows are closed.

Note that the provision for central air conditioning is to allow the occupant to keep windows and doors closed if

desired to achieve a quiet indoor acoustic environment.

As the site is within 300 metres of the CP rail line, a general warning clause should be used to inform prospective

purchasers or tenants of potential noise concerns.

3.2 RAIL VIBRATION

A vibration study is not required due to the site being located outside the 75 metre vibration zone of influence.

3.3 ROAD VIBRATION

Due to the nature of vehicles, with pneumatic tires and suspension systems, it is generally accepted that road

traffic will not be a significant source of vibration.



Ref. No.: 7419-001

2018-08-16

Cambium Inc. Page 5

4.0 NOISE ASSESSMENT

The noise assessment was conducted using predictive calculations of road and rail noise developed by the

MECP: Ontario Road Noise Analysis Method for Environment and Transportation (ORNAMENT) (Ontario Ministry

of the Environment, Conservation, and Parks, 1999), and Sound from Trains Environmental Analysis Method

(STEAM) (Ontario Ministry of the Environment, Conservation, and Parks, 1999).

Noise impacts were assessed at upper storey plane of window (POW) receptor locations, and at the outdoor living

area (OLA) located on the shared rooftop patio.

• POW – Plane of window receptor representative of the worst case exposure on each side of the proposed

development;

• OLA – Outdoor living area receptor located on the shared rooftop patio;

Based on observations and measurements at the Site, local road noise does contribution to local noise levels.

Traffic data used for the road noise assessment was obtained from data provided by the Regional Municipality of

Durham. In relation to development planning, Brock Road should be considered to have a forecasted Annual

Average Daily Traffic count of 40000, with 5.25% medium sized trucks, and 9.75% heavy trucks. The City of

Ottawa recommended day/night split of 92.5%/7.5% for arterial roads was used.

Rail traffic data was provided by CP Rail. The maximum values were used in the calculation. Future traffic

volumes were predicted using a growth of 2.5% of traffic per year for 10 years.

Traffic data requests and responses are provided in Appendix A. STEAM and ORNAMENT calculations are

provided in Appendix B.

The results of the assessment show rooftop OLA noise levels of approximately 60 dBA, and plane of window

noise levels of between 60 dBA and 75 dBA depending on their location on the building. Details are provided in

Table 1 Results Summary, and are discussed in section 5.0.



Ref. No.: 7419-001

2018-08-16

Cambium Inc. Page 6

5.0 DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS

5.1 OUTDOOR LIVING SPACES

The shared rooftop patio is defined as the OLA for this multi-unit residential building. The noise impact form

combined road and rail is predicted to exceed the 55 dBA criterion but remain below the 60 dBA limit provided

that the rooftop patio is situated on the east side of the building such that west building facade will protect the

outdoor living areas from the noise impact of the road below. Additional noise reduction may be achieved by

providing screening with a building parapet or other rooftop features and barriers. The noise impacts of the road

and of the rail contribute fairly equally to the impacts at the OLA.

Within this noise impact range, it is recommended that options to provide noise reductions be explored such as

positioning of the OLA; however, if noise reduction is determined to be unfeasible, then a warning clause should

be provided to prospective buyers, informing them of the potential for increased noise impacts. The

recommended warning clause Type A is included in Appendix D.

Note that based on the road noise impact results Cambium does not believe that it is feasible to meet 55 dBA or

60 dBA noise limits with any outdoor areas at grade. Basic calculations indicate at the applicable distance, a

barrier of 7.5 m in elevation would be required. Therefore it is recommended that the design continue to define

the shared rooftop patio as the OLA. The only technically feasible way to ensure an OLA at grade, would be to

re-arrange the site so that the building could screen a public green space from the roadway. Given the needs of

the development, this is not seen to be feasible. Furthermore Cambium would suspect that the municipal

authority would not authorize the use of a 7.5 m barrier in this case, most zoning bylaws and fence bylaws restrict

this type of construction.

5.2 BUILDING FAÇADE NOISE IMPACTS

Noise impacts calculated at the building façade are used to estimate façade requirements to achieve the indoor

noise criteria. In in order to determine the worst-case façade requirements, the method outlined in the National

Research Council Canada Publication: Controlling Sound Transmission into Buildings (Quirt, 1985) was used.

The results of Cambium’s analysis indicate that the 24 hour Leq at the plane of window exceeds 60 dBA (75 dBA

daytime, 69 dBA nighttime). The indoor living areas noise limits are defined in section 3.1.

Note that as per NPC-300 and the predicted rail and road traffic levels, air conditioning must be provided for

receptors on the north, south and west side of the building. The east side receptors must be constructed with the

provision for air conditioning to be installed however it is not strictly required to be installed.



Ref. No.: 7419-001

2018-08-16

Cambium Inc. Page 7

Windows must be selected based on acoustic design considerations on all sides of the building, Cambium has

completed basic selection calculations however during detailed building design calculations should be refined

based on window/wall area. Specific STC rating recommendations are provided in Table 2.

Finally all units will require warning clauses on the deeds as outlined in Table 3.



Ref. No.: 7419-001

2018-08-16

Cambium Inc. Page 9

REFERENCES

Bies, D. A. (2003). Engineering Noise Control Theory and Practice. New York: Spon Press.

CP Rail. (n.d.). Principal Main Line Requirements.

Ontario Ministry of the Environment, Conservation, and Parks. (1999). ORNAMENT Ontario Road Noise Analysis

Method for Environment and Transportation.

Ontario Ministry of the Environment, Conservation, and Parks. (1999). STEAM Sound from Trains Environmental

Analysis Method.

Ontario Ministry of the Environment, Conservation, and Parks. (2017). NPC-300 - Environmental Noise Guideline

Stationary and Transportation Sources - Approval and Planning.

Quirt, J. D. (1985). Controlling Sound Transmission into Buildings. NRC Publications Archive.

Railway Association of Canada and Federation of Canadian Municipalities. (2013). Guidelines for New

Development in Proximity to Railway Operations.



Ref. No.: 7419-001

2018-08-16

Cambium Inc.

Appended Figures

P.O. Box 325, 52 Hunter Street EastPeterborough, Ontario, K9H 1G5Tel: (705) 742.7900 Fax: (705) 742.7907www.cambium-inc.comLake Ontario(lac Ontario)

Petticoat C

re

ek

Brougham

Cre

ek

Ganats

ekiagon Creek

Major Creek

Urfé

Cre

ek

Michell Cree

k

Lyn

de

Cree

k

Re

eso

rCree

k

West

Duffin

sC

reek

Wes t DuffinsC

reek

Little Rouge Cre

ek

YO

RK

DU

RH

AM

LIN

E

MCLEVIN AV E

BAYLY ST E

MORNING

SIDE

AV

E

WE

STN

EY

RD

S

NE

ILS

ON

RD

KINGSTON RD W

CO

CH

RA

NE

ST

KINGSTON RD E

RA

VE

NS

CR

OF

TR

D

ROSSLAND RD W

SHEPPARDAVE E

KIN

GSTO

NRD

AU

DLE

YRD

S

LIV

ER

PO

OL

RD

ALT

ON

A R

D

PIC

KE

RIN

G

PKY

BA

LD

WIN

ST

S

LA

KE

DRWY W

FINCH AVE

CH

UR

CH

ST

S

SHEPPARD AVE

WH

ITE

SR

D

BR

OC

K R

D

KIN

SA

LE

RD

CH

UR

CH

ST

N

SALE

M

RD

S

M URISO

N

B LVD

BRAY

MOREBLVD

BR

OC

KRD

WE

ST

NE

YR

DN

3RD CON RD

TAUNTON RD W

ME

AD

OW

VALE

RD

MCQU

AY

BLV

D

DE

LANEYDR

BE

AR

E R

D

CO

UN

TRYLA

NE

FA

IRP

OR

T R

D

WHITEVALE RD

AS

HB

UR

NR

D

RE

ES

OR

RD

C

HAPMAN DR

NO

RT

H R

D

DIX

IE R

D

HA

RW

OO

DA

VE

S

H

ARWOO

DA

VE

N

LA

KE

RID

GE

RD

WE

ST

NE

Y R

D

16TH AVE

AU

DLE

Y R

D N

STEELES AVE E

CO

RO

NA

TIO

NR

D

SA

LEMRD

N

ROSSLAND RD E

RO

SE

BA

NK

RD

SE

WE

LLS

RD

DUNDAS ST W

6TH CON RD

TW

YNR

IVERS DR

SH

OA

L P

OIN

T R

D

5TH CON RD

TAUNTON RD

SC

AR

BO

RO

UG

H P

ICK

ER

ING

TLIN

E

OLD FINCH AVE

GR

EEN

WO

OD

RD

VICTORIA ST W

BAYLY

ST

TAUNTON RD E

SA

ND

Y B

EA

CH

RD

8TH CON RD

9TH CON RD

SLIN

E 2

8

LA

KE

RID

GE

RD

N

14TH AVE

HA

LLS

RD

N

KERR ISON DR EF

INLE

YA

VE

PIN

EG

R

OVE

AVE

SLIN

E 1

4

MO

NA

RC

HAVE

SLIN

E 2

0

M

AJ

OR

O

AKS

RD

SPR

UC

EH

ILL

RD

7TH CON RD

SQ

UIR

ES

BE

AC

H R

D

7TH CON RD

11T

H C

ON

C

LA

KE

RID

GE

RD

S

8TH CON RD

SLIN

E 4

SA

LE

M R

D4TH CON RD

SLIN

E 3

0

SLIN

E 6

HA

LLS

RD

S

SLIN

E 1

2

SLIN

E 2

4

SLIN

E 3

2

SLIN

E 1

6

SLIN

E 2

6

SLIN

E 2

2

SANO

K

DR

HILLS

RD

��

407

��12

��7

��401

��401

��407

��412

Pickering

Locust

Hill

Glen

Grove

Green

River

Brougham

Cedar

Grove

Coronation

Gardens

Dunbarton

Ajax

Squires

Beach

Pickering

Beach

Rosebank

Liverpool

Whitevale

Riverside

June 20181:100,000 Figure:Created by: Checked by:Date:Project No.:Scale: Projection:NAD 1983 UTM Zone 17N

º

0 1 2 3 4 5

km

Highway

Major Road

Minor Road

Railroad

Watercourse

Water Area

Built-Up Area

Wooded Area

LEGEND

SITE

Rev.:

O:\

GIS

\pro

ject_

MX

Ds\7

400

-74

99

\74

19

-00

1 R

S C

oating

s -

Multip

le S

erv

ice

s -

Bro

ck R

oad

Deve

lop

men

t P

ickeri

ng

\201

8-0

6-0

1 F

IG 1

- R

egio

nal Lo

ca

tion P

lan.m

xd

CPM7419-001 NJY 1111

REGIONAL LOCATION PLANNotes:

- Base mapping features are © Queen's Printer of Ontario, 2017 (this doesnot constitute an endorsement by the Ministry of Natural Resources or theOntario Government).- Distances on this plan are in metres and can be converted to feet bydividing by 0.3048.- Cambium Inc. makes every effort to ensure this map is free from errors butcannot be held responsible for any damages due to error or omissions. Thismap should not be used for navigation or legal purposes. It is intended forgeneral reference use only.

PHASE ONE PHASE ONE PHASE ONE PHASE ONE ENVIRONMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENTSITE ASSESSMENTSITE ASSESSMENTSITE ASSESSMENT2184107 ONTARIO INC.Concession 3, Part of Lot 18, Brock Road, Pickering, Ontario



Ref. No.: 7419-001

2018-08-16

Cambium Inc.

Appended Tables

Noise and Vibration Impact Study, Brock Road, Pickering2184107 Ontario Inc.

Ref. No.: 7419-001

Table 1 Noise Prediction Results

Road Rail Combined Controls Road Rail Combined Controls

OLA 56.6 57.0 59.8 WC A - - -POW - South 72.4 60.0 72.6 WC D + Install AC + STC 64.5 62.2 66.5 WC A + WC D + Install AC + STCPOW - East 60.4 48.0 60.6 WC C + Design AC + STC 52.5 50.2 54.5 WC A + WC C + Design AC + STCPOW - North 72.4 60.0 72.6 WC D + Install AC + STC 64.5 62.2 66.5 WC A + WC D + Install AC + STCPOW - West 75.4 63.0 75.6 WC D + Install AC + STC 67.5 65.2 69.5 WC A + WC D + Install AC + STC

Rail noise based on max daily time period counts provided by CP rail with forcasted growth of 2.5% for 10 years

23:00 to 07:00Receptor

Road noise based on traffic forcast provided by the Regional Municipality of Durham, 92.5% day:night split.Note - Predicted Levels for side windows and rear windows based on MOECC assumption of 3 dB reduction for side walls and 15 dB reduction for rear

Noise Impact (dBA, Leq)07:00 to 23:00

Table 1 - Results Summary


Ref. No.: 7419-001

Table 2a: Required STC Calculations (BPN 56 Calculation) notes - North, West, South Facing Facades

Day Time Sound LevelUnits

Outdoor Sound Level 75.6 dBAFree Field Correction 3 dBARequired Indoor Sound Level 40 dBARequired Reduction 38.6 dBA

Incident Sound Angle 0-90 degreesAngle Correction Factor (BPN 56) 0 dB BPN 56 Table 2

Percentage of Transmission Wall 10 %10 dB BPN 56 Table 3

Percentage of Transmission Window 90 %0.5 dB BPN 56 Table 3

Transmission Calculations (assumed dimensions)

Wall Percent of floor 50.00% assumed

Window Percent of floor 50.00% assumed

Room Absorption HardRoom Correction - Wall -2 dB BPN 56 Table 4Room Correction - Window -2 dB BPN 56 Table 4

Spectrum type E BPN 56 Figure 1Component Category d BPN 56 Table 5Frequency correction - Wall 9 dB BPN 56 Table 5Frequency correction - Window 6 dB BPN 56 Table 5

Min Required STC Rating Wall 56Min Required STC Rating Window 43

Table 2a - STC W75


Ref. No.: 7419-001

Nighttime Sound LevelUnits




Percentage of Transmission Window 90 %0.5 dB BPN 56 Table 3


Wall Percent of floor 50.00% assumed

Window Percent of floor 50.00% assumed

Room Absorption HardRoom Correction - Wall -2 dB BPN 56 Table 4Room Correction - Window -2 dB BPN 56 Table 4

Spectrum type E BPN 56 Figure 1Component Category d BPN 56 Table 5Frequency correction - Wall 9 dB BPN 56 Table 5Frequency correction - Window 6 dB


- Calculation process based on National Research Council Canada Publication: Controlling Sound Transmission into Buildings (Quirt, J. David) 1985

Table 2a - STC W75


Ref. No.: 7419-001

Table 2b: Required STC Calculations (BPN 56 Calculation) notes - East Facing Facades

Day Time Sound LevelUnits




Percentage of Transmission Window 50 %3 dB BPN 56 Table 3


Wall Percent of floor 11.82%

Window Percent of floor 19.09%

Room Absorption IntermediateRoom Correction - Wall -8 dB BPN 56 Table 4Room Correction - Window -6 dB BPN 56 Table 4



Table 2b - STC W60


Ref. No.: 7419-001

Nighttime Sound LevelUnits




Percentage of Transmission Window 50 %3 dB BPN 56 Table 3


Wall Percent of floor 11.82%

Window Percent of floor 19.09%

Room Absorption IntermediateRoom Correction - Wall -8 dB BPN 56 Table 4Room Correction - Window -6 dB BPN 56 Table 4



- Calculation process based on National Research Council Canada Publication: Controlling Sound Transmission into Buildings (Quirt, J. David) 1985

Table 2b - STC W60


Ref. No.: 7419-001

Table 3 Summary of Noise Controls

OLA (all units)

POW - North

POW - East

POW - South

POW - West

Recommended Implement Warning Clause A for all units.

Recommended implement Warning Clause D, design and construct with air conditioning included, exterior façade, windows, and doors must have STC design requirements

met.Recommended implement Warning Clause C, design and

construct building to allow for the installation of air conditioning, exterior façade, windows, and doors must

have STC design requirements met.


met.


met.

Table 3 - Noise Controls



Ref. No.: 7419-001

2018-08-16

Cambium Inc.

Appendix A

Rail and Road Traffic Data Requests

ROAD SEGMENT TRAFFIC FORECASTS FOR NOISE ANALYSES

This information is to be used as the basis for assessing the potential impacts of noise, generated by traffic on Provincial Highways and arterial roads, on proposed land uses that are sensitive (e.g., residential subdivisions). Arterial roads include existing and future Type A, B and C, as designated in the Durham Regional Official Plan.

Noise assessment reports recommend specific measures to be integrated into the design of sensitive developments to reduce road noise impacts to acceptable levels.

The Regional Municipality of Durham

Planning and Economic Development Department

Planning Division

605 ROSSLAND RD. E.4TH FLOORP.O. BOX 623WHITBY, ON L1N 6A3CANADA905-668-77111-800-372-1102Fax: 905-666-6208E-Mail: [email protected]

www.durham.ca

Commissioner of Planning andEconomic Development

Brian Bridgeman, MCIP, RPP

Trevor Copeland, Cambrium Inc.

P.O. Box 325, Peterborough, ON K9H 1G5

(705) 742-7900

Brock Road, north of Rex Heath Drive.Please note that future widening to 6 lanes is planned for curbside HOV lanes.

Pickering

April-20-18

April-25-18

Chris Leitch

Brock Road, south of Taunton Road

40,000 6 15 65 35 60

0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0

Provided For:

Name / Name of Firm:

Address:

Telephone: Fax:

Location of Proposal:

Lot(s): Concession:Municipality:

Durham Region File No. (if available):

Name of Property Owner (if available):

Date Request Received: Received By:

Date Forecast Sent:

Name of Road Segment Forecasted AADT*

No. of Lanes

% of Trucks

Heavy : Medium Truck Ratio

Speed (km/h)

* Average Annual Daily Traffic. Forecast based on ultimate development according to the Durham Regional Official Plan.

April-25-18 Page 1 of 1

T 905 803 3429E [email protected]

800 - 1290 Central ParkwayWestMississauga, OntarioCanada L5C 4R3

April 10, 2018

Via email: [email protected]

Trevor CopelandCambium Inc.52 Hunter Street EastP.O. Box 325Peterborough, Ontario K9H 1G5

Dear Sir/Madam:

Re: Rail Traffic Volumes, CP Mileage 186.78, Belleville Subdivision,Brock Road south of Taunton Road

This is in reference to your request for rail traffic data in the vicinity of Brock Road in the City ofPickering. The study area is located at mile 186.78 of our Belleville Subdivision, which is classified as aPrincipal Main line.

The information requested is as follows:

1. Number of freight trains between 0700 & 2300: 6Number of freight trains between 2300 & 0700: 5

2. Average number of cars per train: 88Maximum cars per train freight: 196

3. Number of locomotives per train: 2 (4 Maximum)

4. Maximum permissible train speed is 60 miles per hour (freight)

5. There are no grade crossings through the study area, however, the whistle may be sounded ifdeemed necessary by the train crew for safety reasons.

6. There is one mainline track at his location and a rail bridge over Brock Road which may causemore than normal noise.

The information provided is based on recent rail traffic. Variations of the above may exist on a day-to-day basis. Specific measurements may also vary significantly depending on customer needs.

Yours truly,

Josie Tomei SR/WASpecialist Real Estate Sales & Acquisitions – Ontario



Ref. No.: 7419-001

2018-08-16

Cambium Inc.

Appendix B

Steam and Ornament Outputs

RD1 at 15mSTAMSON 5.0 NORMAL REPORT Date: 14-08-2018 15:13:31MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY / NOISE ASSESSMENT

Filename: Time Period: Day/Night 16/8 hoursDescription: RD1 at 15m

Road data, segment # 1: (day/night)------------------------------------Car traffic volume : 31450/2550 veh/TimePeriod *Medium truck volume : 1943/157 veh/TimePeriod *Heavy truck volume : 3608/292 veh/TimePeriod *Posted speed limit : 60 km/hRoad gradient : 0 %Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete)

* Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input:

24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): 40000 Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 5.25 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 9.75 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : 92.50

Data for Segment # 1: (day/night)----------------------------------Angle1 Angle2 : -90.00 deg 90.00 degWood depth : 0 (No woods.)No of house rows : 0 / 0Surface : 1 (Absorptive ground surface)Receiver source distance : 15.00 / 15.00 mReceiver height : 1.50 / 1.50 mTopography : 1 (Flat/gentle slope; no barrier)Reference angle : 0.00

Results segment # 1: (day)---------------------------

Source height = 1.77 m

ROAD (0.00 + 74.54 + 0.00) = 74.54 dBAAngle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq P.Adj D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj H.Adj B.Adj SubLeq---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -90 90 0.65 75.98 0.00 0.00 -1.44 0.00 0.00 0.00 74.54----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Segment Leq : 74.54 dBA

Total Leq All Segments: 74.54 dBA

Results segment # 1: (night)-----------------------------





TOTAL Leq FROM ALL SOURCES (DAY): 74.54 (NIGHT): 66.63

Page 1

RD6 at 15mSTAMSON 5.0 NORMAL REPORT Date: 14-08-2018 15:14:48MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY / NOISE ASSESSMENT

Filename: Time Period: Day/Night 16/8 hoursDescription: RD6 at 15m




Data for Segment # 1: (day/night)----------------------------------Angle1 Angle2 : -90.00 deg 90.00 degWood depth : 0 (No woods.)No of house rows : 0 / 0Surface : 1 (Absorptive ground surface)Receiver source distance : 15.00 / 15.00 mReceiver height : 16.50 / 16.50 mTopography : 1 (Flat/gentle slope; no barrier)Reference angle : 0.00












Page 1

RD7 OLA 18mb at 27mSTAMSON 5.0 NORMAL REPORT Date: 14-08-2018 15:22:47MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY / NOISE ASSESSMENT

Filename: Time Period: Day/Night 16/8 hoursDescription: RD7 OLA 18mb at 27m




Data for Segment # 1: (day/night)----------------------------------Angle1 Angle2 : -90.00 deg 90.00 degWood depth : 0 (No woods.)No of house rows : 0 / 0Surface : 1 (Absorptive ground surface)Receiver source distance : 27.00 / 27.00 mReceiver height : 19.50 / 19.50 mTopography : 2 (Flat/gentle slope; with barrier)Barrier angle1 : -90.00 deg Angle2 : 90.00 degBarrier height : 18.00 mBarrier receiver distance : 15.00 / 15.00 mSource elevation : 0.00 mReceiver elevation : 0.00 mBarrier elevation : 0.00 mReference angle : 0.00



Barrier height for grazing incidence------------------------------------Source ! Receiver ! Barrier ! Elevation ofHeight (m) ! Height (m) ! Height (m) ! Barrier Top (m)------------+-------------+-------------+-------------- 1.77 ! 19.50 ! 9.65 ! 9.65

ROAD (0.00 + 56.61 + 0.00) = 56.61 dBAAngle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq P.Adj D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj H.Adj B.Adj SubLeq---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -90 90 0.00 75.98 0.00 -2.55 0.00 0.00 0.00 -16.83 56.61----------------------------------------------------------------------------





Barrier height for grazing incidence------------------------------------Source ! Receiver ! Barrier ! Elevation ofHeight (m) ! Height (m) ! Height (m) ! Barrier Top (m)------------+-------------+-------------+-------------- 1.77 ! 19.50 ! 9.65 ! 9.65

ROAD (0.00 + 48.70 + 0.00) = 48.70 dBAAngle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq P.Adj D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj H.Adj B.Adj SubLeq

Page 1

RD7 OLA 18mb at 27m---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -90 90 0.00 68.08 0.00 -2.55 0.00 0.00 0.00 -16.83 48.70----------------------------------------------------------------------------




Page 2

TR1 and OLA at 200mSTAMSON 5.0 NORMAL REPORT Date: 20-04-2018 11:14:02MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY / NOISE ASSESSMENT

Filename: Time Period: Day/Night 16/8 hoursDescription: tr1

Rail data, segment # 1: rail (day/night)----------------------------------------Train ! Trains ! Speed !# loc !# Cars! Eng !ContType ! !(km/h) !/Train!/Train! type !weld-----------------+-------------+-------+------+------+------+----* 1. train ! 7.7/6.4 ! 97.0 ! 4.0 !196.0 !Diesel! No

* The identified number of trains have been adjusted for future growth using the following parameters:

Train type: ! Unadj. ! Annual % ! Years of ! No Name ! Trains ! Increase ! Growth !--------------------+--------+----------+----------+ 1. train ! 6.0/5.0 ! 2.50 ! 10.00 !

Data for Segment # 1: rail (day/night)--------------------------------------Angle1 Angle2 : -90.00 deg 90.00 degWood depth : 0 (No woods.)No of house rows : 0 / 0Surface : 1 (Absorptive ground surface)Receiver source distance : 200.00 / 200.00 mReceiver height : 1.50 / 1.50 mTopography : 1 (Flat/gentle slope; no barrier)No WhistleReference angle : 0.00

Results segment # 1: rail (day)-------------------------------

LOCOMOTIVE (0.00 + 55.86 + 0.00) = 55.86 dBAAngle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj H.Adj B.Adj SubLeq---------------------------------------------------------------------- -90 90 0.58 75.02 -17.83 -1.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 55.86----------------------------------------------------------------------

WHEEL (0.00 + 50.80 + 0.00) = 50.80 dBAAngle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj H.Adj B.Adj SubLeq---------------------------------------------------------------------- -90 90 0.66 70.93 -18.67 -1.46 0.00 0.00 0.00 50.80----------------------------------------------------------------------



Results segment # 1: rail (night)---------------------------------






Page 1

TR1 and OLA at 200m

Page 2

TR6 at 200mSTAMSON 5.0 NORMAL REPORT Date: 20-04-2018 11:46:10MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY / NOISE ASSESSMENT

Filename: Time Period: Day/Night 16/8 hoursDescription: tr6

Rail data, segment # 1: rail (day/night)----------------------------------------Train ! Trains ! Speed !# loc !# Cars! Eng !ContType ! !(km/h) !/Train!/Train! type !weld-----------------+-------------+-------+------+------+------+----* 1. train ! 7.7/6.4 ! 97.0 ! 4.0 !196.0 !Diesel! No

* The identified number of trains have been adjusted for future growth using the following parameters:

Train type: ! Unadj. ! Annual % ! Years of ! No Name ! Trains ! Increase ! Growth !--------------------+--------+----------+----------+ 1. train ! 6.0/5.0 ! 2.50 ! 10.00 !

Data for Segment # 1: rail (day/night)--------------------------------------Angle1 Angle2 : -90.00 deg 90.00 degWood depth : 0 (No woods.)No of house rows : 0 / 0Surface : 1 (Absorptive ground surface)Receiver source distance : 200.00 / 200.00 mReceiver height : 16.50 / 16.50 mTopography : 1 (Flat/gentle slope; no barrier)No WhistleReference angle : 0.00

Results segment # 1: rail (day)-------------------------------





Results segment # 1: rail (night)---------------------------------






Page 1

TR6 at 200m

Page 2



Ref. No.: 7419-001

2018-08-16

Cambium Inc.

Appendix C

Site Plan

RO

AD W

IDEN

ING

BY

DEP

OSI

TED

PLA

N 6

10 (H

WYS

)

SID

EWAL

K

CAR

OU

SEL

DR

IVE

BRO

CK

RO

AD

48.71N71°16'30'' E

N71°17'00'' E 55.36

61.3

5

60.9

6N

18°4

2'40

'' W

N12

°28'

50''

W

PROPOSED SIX-STOREY COMMERCIAL AND

RESIDENTIAL BUILDING

CO

NC

RET

E W

ALK

CONCRETE WALK

EXIS

TIN

G 3

-STO

REY

BR

ICK

TOW

NH

OU

SE

EXISTING 3-STOREY BRICK TOWNHOUSE

FIRE ROUTEHEAVY DUTY ASPHALT

LAN

DSC

APE

PARKETTE

LANDSCAPE

RAMPDN

RIGHT IN RIGHT OUT ONLY

FIR

E R

OU

TEH

EAVY

DU

TY A

SPH

ALT

LOADING / RECEIVING

FS

LANDSCAPE

RET

AIL

PA

RKI

NG

RAMP TO UNDERGROUND PARKING

1260

235

648

1270

3

CO

NC

RET

E W

ALKW

AY

CONCRETE WALKWAY

TRANSFORMER

22000 22533

TWO

-STO

RE

YO

NE-

STO

RE

Y

1362 2848

4209

4209

(TYP)5700 3000

R 12000R 60

00

R 6000

6500

12

FS

6000

LANDSCAPE

4894

7

LANDSCAPE

3800

4500

4500

RESIDENCE ENTRANCE

20000

R 9726

6000

EXISTING TRANSFOMER ON CONC. PAD

TELEPHONE PEDESTAL TO BE RELOCATED

3503

2700

(TYP)5700

(TYP)6500

2228

10138

(TYP

)26

00

CONCRETE WALKWAY

1200

1633

CONCRETE WALKWAY

BASEMENT BELOW

BASEMENT BELOW

BASEMENT BELOW

BASEMENT BELOW

11652

SITE

TAUNTON RD

BRO

CK

Zents Dr

LOT AREA: 3,171 M2 (0.784 ACRE)

GROSS FLOOR AREA (GFA)

PARKING

REQUIRED: 1.0 SPACE PER UNITTOTAL PARKING REQUIRED: 35 SPACESTOTAL PARKING PROVIDED: 40 SPACES

PROPOSED LOT COVERAGE: 27.1%FSI: 1.57

RESIDENTIAL (UNDERGROUND):

VISITOR (UNDERGROUND):

REQUIRED: 0.25 SPACE PER UNITTOTAL PARKING REQUIRED: 8 SPACESTOTAL PARKING PROVIDED: 8 SPACES

SITE

BUILDING AREA: 860 M2 ( 9,261 SF)RETAIL AREA: 598 M2 (6,439 SF)RESIDENTIAL AREA (5 STOREYS): 4,373 M2 (47,070 SF)TOTAL GROSS FLOOR AREA: 4,971 M2 (53,509 SF)

LANDSCAPE AREA: 852 M2 (9,174 SF)LANDSCAPE COVERAGE: 26.8%

PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL UNITS: 35 UNITS.2-BEDROOM: 14 UNITS2-BEDROOM + DEN: 16 UNITS(INCLUDING 5 BARRIER-FREE UNITS)3-BEDROOM + DEN: 5 UNITS

PROPOSED DENSITY: 110 UNITS/HECTARE

RETAIL (SURFACE):

TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED: 19 SPACES( INCLUDING 2 ACCESSIBLE PARKING )

Checked by :

Drawn by :

Date

Scale :

Drawing No :

Project :

Drawing Name :

This drawing is provided by and is the property of AND Architecture Inc..The contractor must verify all dimensions and conditions on site and mustnotify AND Architecture Inc. of any variations from the supplied information.This drawing is not to be scaled. The architect is not responsible for other consultants' information shown on this drawing. Refer to the appropriate consultant's drawings before proceeding with the work. Construction must conform to all applicable codes and requirements of authorities having jurisdiction. The contractor working from drawings not specifically marked 'For Construction' must assume full responsibility and bear costs for any corrections or damages resulting from his work.

Project No :MAY 2017

C:\

User

s\H

enry

Wa

ng\D

ocum

ents

\BRO

CK

ROA

D -

SPA

REV

2_H

enry

Wa

ng.rv

t

As indicated

HW

JWA1.1

SIX-STOREY COMMERCIAL ANDRESIDENTIAL BUILDING

SITE PLAN

BROCK ROAD, PICKERING, ONTARIO

17029

1 : 150SITE PLAN1

KEY PLAN

No. Date: Issued/Revision: By1 MAR. 08/18 ISSUED FOR COORDINATION HW2 MAY 09/18 ISSUED FOR REZONING HW3 MAY 28/18 ISSUED FOR COORDINATION HW4 JULY 24/18 REISSUED FOR REVIEW HW



Ref. No.: 7419-001

2018-08-16

Cambium Inc.

Appendix D

Noise Impact Warning Clauses



Ref. No.: 7419-001

2018-08-16

Cambium Inc.

CP Rail Warning Clause (All units):

Warning: CP Railway or its assigns or successors in interest has or have a rights-of-way within 300 metres from

the land the subject hereof. There may be alterations to or expansions of the railway facilities on such rights-of-

way in the future including the possibility that the railway or its assigns or successors as aforesaid may expand its

operations, which expansion may affect the living environment of the residents in the vicinity, notwithstanding the

inclusion of any noise and vibration attenuating measures in the design of the development and individual

dwelling(s). CP Railway will not be responsible for any complaints or claims arising from the use of such facilities

and/or operations on, over or under the aforesaid rights-of-way.

NPC-300 Type A (All Units):

"Purchasers/tenants are advised that sound levels due to increasing road traffic and rail traffic may occasionally

interfere with some activities of the dwelling occupants as the sound levels exceed the sound level limits of the

Municipality and the Ministry of the Environment.”

NPC 300 Type C: (East Façade only)

"This dwelling unit has been designed with the provision for adding central air conditioning at the occupant's

discretion. Installation of central air conditioning by the occupant in low and medium density developments will

allow windows and exterior doors to remain closed, thereby ensuring that the indoor sound levels are within the

sound level limits of the Municipality and the Ministry of the Environment."

NPC 300 Type D: (All other units)

"This dwelling unit has been supplied with a central air conditioning system which will allow windows and exterior

doors to remain closed, thereby ensuring that the indoor sound levels are within the sound level limits of the

Municipality and the Ministry of the Environment."

planning noise impact study, concession 3 part of …...cambium inc. p.o. box 325 52 hunter street...

Documents