planning for instructional implementation

43
SOURCE: MORRISON, GARY R. DESIGNING EFFECTIVE INSTRUCTION, 6TH EDITION . JOHN WILEY & SONS PLANNING FOR INSTRUCTIONAL IMPLEMENTATION

Upload: leesha-roberts

Post on 05-Dec-2014

712 views

Category:

Education


1 download

DESCRIPTION

this presentation is based on Morrison, Ross, Kalman and Kemp Implementation of Instruction

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Planning for instructional implementation

S O U R C E : M O R R I S O N , G A R Y R . D E S I G N I N G E F F E C T I V E I N S T R U C T I O N , 6 T H E D I T I O N . J O H N W I L E Y & S O N S

PLANNING FOR INSTRUCTIONAL

IMPLEMENTATION

Page 2: Planning for instructional implementation

QUESTIONS TO CONSIDER

• What is planned change?• How do I develop a plan for implementing my

project?• What resources can I use to implement a project? • What else must I consider when implementing a

project?

Page 3: Planning for instructional implementation
Page 4: Planning for instructional implementation

PLANNED CHANGE

• The Adoption of new innovations can be seen as an organizational change.

• New instruction involves changing the perceptions of users.• Bhola (1982) labeled this process planned change. • Selling the new innovation to users can be seen as Diffusion.• Diffusion is the process of communicating information to a client

and target audience about an innovation (i.e., an instructional intervention) (Rogers, 2003).

• Adoption is the decision to use the innovation. • According to Rogers, there are four components of the diffusion

process: • the innovation• communication• time, and • social system.

Page 5: Planning for instructional implementation

INNOVATION

• An innovation is something new to an organization, manager, worker, teacher, or student who is considering using it. • When an Instructional innovation is produced, it

seen as an innovation to users. • If and when the client or users decide to use the

product or Instruction is dependent on the five characteristics of the intervention(Rogers, 2003).

Page 6: Planning for instructional implementation

THE ADVANTAGE OF THE INNOVATION

• Merit of the Training: Each training product is judged on its relative merit. • Perception of the Training: If the users perceive it

as providing useful knowledge, then they are more likely to adopt it. Although the training program might have many advantages and make an employee or student more productive, leading to monetary or efficiency rewards, the user has to perceive it as being advantageous.

Page 7: Planning for instructional implementation

COMPATIBILITY WITH VALUES, NEEDS, AND EXPERIENCES

• Alignment with User Values and Needs: • Users will evaluate a training program or instructional

innovation to determine whether it is compatible with their values, matches their needs, and is compatible with what they have learned in the past.

• For example, in recent years there has been a push for professors and teachers to adopt a more student-centered approach to their teaching. This approach requires the professor or teacher to change his or her role from that of a lecturer to one of a facilitator. Some may perceive this role shift as incompatible with their values—teachers need to lecture to teach the student.

Page 8: Planning for instructional implementation

INNOVATION COMPLEXITY

• Level of Difficulty and Complexity:• If the users perceive the innovation as complex or difficult

to use, they are more likely to resist using it. • perception of complexity can become a major obstacle to

adoption of the innovation. • For example Consider the difficulty you might face

implementing Web-based instruction for instructors who have limited experience with the Internet. If the software requires them to create pages using Hypertext Markup Language (HTML), participate in online chats, and create PowerPoint presentations with streaming video, they will probably view this innovation as too complex to adopt.

• The complexity of such a system could cause the users to resist adopting it.

Page 9: Planning for instructional implementation

ABILITY TO TRY THE INNOVATION

• User Attempt at Innovation Use:• Users often like to try an innovation on a small scale first. • For example, the Ministry of Education might identify a

need to use a wireless network in the schools where all the students have laptop computers. Rather than purchasing equipment for all the schools, the network administrators might install this new innovation in one or two classrooms of schools to determine whether it will meet their needs. If it works, then the administrators may make the decision to install it in all the schools.

Page 10: Planning for instructional implementation

OBSERVABILITY OF RESULTS

• Visible Benefits: • A training program is more likely to be adopted when the users can easily

see the benefits. • For example, if the managers of the accountants can see a benefit of the

training for a new auditing software, they are more likely to send others to the training. However, if an accountant returns from the training and either refuses to use or seldom uses the new software, others will not see the benefits and may not attend the training. Also, if a critical mass of users is not trained, the training may become a wasted resource because those using the software will not have the support of management or other employees.

• Communication of the Advantages of the Innovation:• As we plan an implementation strategy for a new instructional product, we

must consider how to communicate the advantage of the product, its compatibility with existing ways, how the user can try it out with minimal risk, and how to make the results observable. We also must show that it is not a complex process

Page 11: Planning for instructional implementation

COMMUNICATION

• Communication is central to the diffusion process. • We have to communicate information about the innovation to potential

users so they can decide to use it. • The most effective communication occurs between individuals who are

similar, such as those belonging to the same peer group or having similar interests (Rogers, 2003).

• For example, a designer needs to consider who could best communicate information on a new course for plant electricians. Is it the instructional designer, or is it the master electrician who served as the SME for the project who should communicate information about the course? The master electrician is a member of the group of electricians and probably has more in common with group members than the instructional designer. Selecting the master electrician to sell the course may be more productive than having the instructional designer sell it, because the electrician has more in common with the target group.

Page 12: Planning for instructional implementation

TIME

• How and When Users Choose to Adopt Innovations:• Users make decisions to adopt an innovation at different

times in the life of the innovation. • Rogers (1995) classified these adopters into five

categories. These are:• ‘‘first adopters’’• ‘‘early adopters’’ • ‘‘early majority adopters’’. • ‘‘late majority adopters• ‘‘laggards

Page 13: Planning for instructional implementation

SOCIAL SYSTEM

• Relationships Between Users and Implementers:• i.e. networks and relationships between the members of our

target audience. • Opinion leaders can influence the success of the innovation

implementation• Identifying the opinion leaders and other stakeholders early in

the implementation-planning process will identify one group to target with communications.

• Identify the various networks in the social system that can help communicate information about the instructional intervention. These networks of people, however, may also resist the adoption process.

• Understanding the role of the innovation, communication, time, and the social system can help us develop a plan for implementing our product (Malopinsky & Osman, 2006).

Page 14: Planning for instructional implementation

THE CLER MODEL

• The implementation strategy is a means of specifying how to communicate information about an instructional product and to whom.

• One strategy for preparing an implementation plan is Bhola’s (1982, 1988–1989) CLER model.

• CLER is an acronym for:• Configuration • Linkages • Environment• Resources

• These components are used to facilitate the diffusion and adoption processes to implement an innovation.

• The CLER model, or the configurational theory of innovation diffusion, defines diffusion or implementation of an innovation (D)i as a function of social configurations (C), linkages between the designer system and client system (L), the surrounding environment (E), and resources available to the designer and the client (R):

Di = f (C, L, E, R)

Page 15: Planning for instructional implementation

CONFIGURATION

• Configuration represents the network of relationships of various social units in the organization and the individuals who play a variety of formal and informal roles in the ‘‘in’’ group. These relationships include:• the designer system. • The designer system includes the instructional designer, • the evaluator, and • the manager of the instructional design department.

• The client system includes:

Page 16: Planning for instructional implementation

CONFIGURATION

• the target audience as well as the managers and other stakeholders.

• Identifying these configurational relationships and the roles of the various individuals helps us to develop a communication plan for the implementation strategy.• There are four types of configurational

relationships: • individuals, • groups, • institutions, and • cultures.

Page 17: Planning for instructional implementation

CONFIGURATION

• Groups are formal workgroups within an organization such as the accounting department or the electricians. • Institutions are formal organizations such as

businesses or schools. • Culture describes subcultures or communities.

Page 18: Planning for instructional implementation

CONFIGURATION

• For preparing an implementation plan, the configuration includes both the instructional designer (e.g., innovator) and the client, or adopters.

• Using the four types of configurations, Bhola (1982) identifies 16 possible relationships (Table 15-1).

• Table 15-1 lists the various configurational relationships for interactions between the instructional designer and the client.

• Although Bhola (1982) identified 16 possible configurations, the most effective are those that are one-on-one.

Page 19: Planning for instructional implementation

CONFIGURATIONAL RELATIONSHIPS

Page 20: Planning for instructional implementation

LINKAGES

• Linkages represent networks or relationships between and within the instructional designer and client organizations.• Formal linkages exist within the context of the

group and institutional configurations as defined by the management structure. • Informal linkages result from partnerships,

friendships, and working relationships. These informal relationships often bypass traditional organizational structure.

Page 21: Planning for instructional implementation

ENVIRONMENT

• The environment represents the physical, social, and intellectual forces operating within a configuration.

• Environmental forces can provide a supportive, neutral, or inhibiting atmosphere for adopting an innovation.

• Consider, for example, a school that wants to provide students with their own laptop computers they can use in each classroom. A new school could create a supportive environment by providing training and readily available technical support for the teachers. An older school might have a more difficult time due to the physical environment. For example, a lack of electrical outlets placed around the room could make it difficult to charge the batteries during class. Similarly, the desks or tables may not be ergonomically correct or of the right size to hold the laptops. These environmental variables could hinder the plan’s adoption.

Page 22: Planning for instructional implementation

RESOURCES

• Resources are used to support the implementation process. There are six types of resources an instructional designer can use to support the implementation of a project (Bhola, 1982)

Page 23: Planning for instructional implementation

CONCEPTUAL RESOURCES.

• Technical skills and support are one type of conceptual resource that is often needed for implementing projects involving the use of technology.

• Consider the technical support needed to offer a database administrators’ course at a hotel. The course needs computers, software, and access to the company’s intranet.

• Successful implementation of this course requires networking and technical expertise from a variety of individuals.

• Other conceptual resources include management abilities and planning assistance.

Page 24: Planning for instructional implementation

INFLUENCE RESOURCES.

• Goodwill, brand names, incentives, shaming, and threatening are examples of influence resources one can use in the diffusion of an innovation.

• An instructional designer who has developed goodwill during the development phase will have a resource to act on with the client.

• Other types of influence resources include incentives such as bonuses or monetary incentives; for faculty, release time from teaching a course; and travel benefits.

• Negative-influence resources could include the withholding of monetary or promotional incentives.

Page 25: Planning for instructional implementation

MATERIAL RESOURCES

• Financial backing is one type of resource that is often needed to implement a product. Other material resources include computers, software, books, DVD players, video projectors, and physical facilities that can support the implementation.

Page 26: Planning for instructional implementation

PERSONNEL RESOURCES

• Depending on the size of the project, worker resources can be a critical issue during the implementation phase. Having a number of individuals who can be available at the right time to provide essential training or facilitation is essential if the product implementation is on a short time frame.

Page 27: Planning for instructional implementation

INSTITUTIONAL RESOURCES

• The infrastructure provided by the institution including both the technology/communication and personnel infrastructure is considered an institutional resource.

• Other resources can include institutional capabilities, such as printing and shipping instructional materials.

• For Web-based instruction, a server on either the Internet or intranet is considered an institutional resource necessary for implementation.

• Consider again the introduction of laptop computers. A new school could provide tables for using the laptops that have built-in electrical outlets and network connections. An older school’s building could inhibit the use of laptops because the individual desks are too small to hold the laptops and there are only one or two electrical outlets in the room and a single network connection on the front wall.

Page 28: Planning for instructional implementation

TIME RESOURCE.

• It can take time for all the users to adopt a product. The time needed for the implementation must consider all the adopters, from the innovators to the laggards. Trying to implement the program in an unreasonably short time frame can result in poor results.

Page 29: Planning for instructional implementation

PLANNING THE IMPLEMENTATION WITH THE CLER MODEL

• An implementation plan identifies the various configurational relationships and then identifies ways to manipulate and capitalize on the configurations to facilitate the process.

Page 30: Planning for instructional implementation

IMPLEMENTATION PLAN COMPONENTS

• Implementation Plan according to CLER:• Configuration and Linkages• Environment• Resources• First Course Offerings

Page 31: Planning for instructional implementation

DEVELOPMENTAL STAGES AND INFORMATIONDECISION PROCESS MODELS

• The Concerns-Based Adoption Model (CBAM) (Hall & Hord, 1987; Hord, Ruther- ford, Huling-Austin, & Hall, 1987; Newhouse, 2001) and information-decision process models (Dormant, 1986; Dormant, 1999; Rogers, 1995) describe sequential stages that an individual uses to investigate an innovation and decide whether to adopt or reject it.

• Table 15-2 synthesizes the stages of acceptance. • For CBAM, the individual is initially concerned with

what the change is and how it will personally affect him or her.

• The concerns are informational and personal.

Page 32: Planning for instructional implementation

DEVELOPMENTAL STAGES AND INFORMATIONDECISION PROCESS MODELS

• The next stage is managerial: understanding the mechanics of the change, or ‘‘how to do it.’’

• The last stages of concern consider consequences and collaboration.

• In these later stages, the prospective adopter evaluates whether the change is effective and generates new ideas that refocus the innovation.

• An individual must feel a sense of control; otherwise the change probably will be resisted (Conner, 1992; King & Anderson, 1995). Participation and involvement of supervisors and SMEs can increase a sense of control as well as reduce uncertainty (see Cummings & Worley, 2005).

Page 33: Planning for instructional implementation
Page 34: Planning for instructional implementation

IMPLEMENTATION DECISIONS

• A training program in industry requires an infrastructure to implement and deliver instruction. The following sections describe the implementation decisions related to instructional delivery, instructional materials, scheduling, and instructors.

Page 35: Planning for instructional implementation

• Program Promotion: Often, the instructional designer is responsible for program promotion. This may involve preparing advertising for the employee newsletter, sending a promotional email announcement to supervisors, or posting flyers in the employee lunchroom. The instructional designer may also meet with the human resources department to ensure that the course is included for consideration in employee development plans. Once the course is implemented, the instructional designer might request that the communications department write a feature story for inclusion in internal publications describing how employees have benefited from the course and how the course has contributed toward organizational goals.

• Instructional Delivery: Some training departments have a support person or group that manages the delivery of the instruction. The complexity of this task grows with the number of different sites and the number of courses offered.

Page 36: Planning for instructional implementation

• Classroom Facilities: • Schedule and Reserve Location• Training rooms at a company, university, or school are often

booked months in advance. • Ensure you carefully decided on your room type.• Include equipment resources list in your reservations

• Media Equipment: • Make Arrangements for media equipment, such as DVD

players and video projectors, • Visit the classroom before because this helps with getting

a sense of layout and placement of resources.• If technology is to be used, involve the Information

Technology/Networking staff in the planning process

Page 37: Planning for instructional implementation

• Other Equipment: • Document other equipment needs such as photocopiers, electrical tools etc.

• Transportation: • Make providence for transport to the course• There are two levels of transportation planning.

• First is transportation from the learner’s home to the training site, which might require air transportation and either a shuttle service or rental car. This level also includes transportation for instructors and guest speakers.

• Second is group transportation for field trips during the course. Buses or vans from either the company car pool or from a private company are options for field-trip transportation.

• Housing: Some companies have training facilities resembling a small college campus that include not only classrooms but also dormitories and cafeterias. Other options include using a hotel that can also provide the training rooms. Again, these facilities must be scheduled in advance.

• Food• Make arrangements for meals/snacks etc. for the duration of the instructional

implementation

Page 38: Planning for instructional implementation

• Materials:• Coordinating the instructional materials for a course can

require a substantial amount of time. Ensure ample time is given for packaging, duplication, shipping etc.

Page 39: Planning for instructional implementation

INSTRUCTORS

• The last implementation decision concerns the instructors. • The two primary issues of concern are the

scheduling and training.

Page 40: Planning for instructional implementation

SCHEDULING

• Some companies have a group of professional instructors or rotate employee experts through the training department to serve as instructors. • For example, expert company engineers might serve as

instructors for the network-engineering course described earlier in this chapter.

• Regardless of the source of the instructors, careful planning is required to schedule their time.

• Using company experts as instructors assumes that their manager will allow them to leave their job several times a year to teach a course.

• Scheduling a course requires consideration of their workload to minimize the impact on their productivity.

Page 41: Planning for instructional implementation

INSTRUCTOR TRAINING

• There are three reasons to provide instructor training. • First is to improve the instructors’ teaching and

presentation skills. • Second is to train instructors on how to teach a specific

course. • Last, instructor training ensures that all instructors

consistently facilitate the course the same way.

Page 42: Planning for instructional implementation

ROLE OF SUPERVISORS

• Supervisors play an important role in preparing employees for training.

• Supervisor involvement increases the likelihood that the employee will learn what is expected.

• Ideally, the supervisor should meet with the employee prior to the training to discuss learning goals and after the training to review what was learned.

• During the meeting, the supervisor also makes clear what the employee is expected to do on the job (see Zenger, Folkman, & Sherman, 2006).

• Supervisor follow-up reinforces new behaviors. In some organizations, the instructional designer provides a briefing guide (or sends an email) to supervisors outlining their support role and a set of key points to discuss before and after the employee attends training.

Page 43: Planning for instructional implementation