planning demand and supply in a supply chain
DESCRIPTION
第三單元 (1) : Planning Demand and Supply in a Supply Chain. Planning Demand and Supply in a Supply Chain. 郭瑞祥教授. 【 本著作除另有註明外,採取 創用 CC 「姓名標示-非商業性-相同方式分享」台灣 3.0 版 授權釋出 】. 1. Outline. Part I: Aggregate planning Part II: Managing predictable variability. 2. Manage Predictable Variability. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Andy Guo
Planning Demand and Supply in a Supply Chain
【 本 著 作 除 另 有 註 明 外 , 採 取 創用 CC「姓名標示-非商業性-相同方式分享」台灣 3.0版授權釋出】
第三單元 (1) : Planning Demand and Supply in a Supply Chain
郭瑞祥教授
1
Andy Guo
Outline
►Part I: Aggregate planning
►Part II: Managing predictable variability
2
Andy Guo
Manage Predictable Variability
► Predicable variability is change in demand that can be forecasted.
► A firm must choose two broad options:– Manage supply (manage capacity and manage
inventory)– Manage demand
► Often companies divide the task– Marketing manages demand maximize revenue– Operations manage supply minimize cost
► Separating the supply and demand decisions makes it difficult to coordinate the supply chain
► Designing product flexibility– Lawn mower manufacturers also make snowblowers
3
Andy Guo
Managing Predictable Variability- Managing Supply -
► Managing inventory
– Time flexibility from workforce– Use of seasonal workforce– Use of subcontracting– Use of dual facilities – dedicated and flexible– Designing product flexibility into the production
processes
► Managing capacity
– Using common components across multiple products– Building inventory of high demand or predictable
demand products4
Andy Guo
Managing Predictable Variability- Managing Demand -
► Demand can be influenced using pricing and other forms of promotions.
– Impact of the promotion on demand– Product margins– Cost of holding inventory– Cost of changing capacity
► Demand increase from promotion results from three factors:
► Four key factors influence the timing of a trade promotion:
– Market growth– Stealing market share– Forward buying Microsoft Office 2010多媒體藝廊
5
Andy Guo
Scenario 4: Aggregate Planning and Promotion at Red Tomato
Month Demand ForecastJanuary 3,000February 2,400
March 2,560
April 3,800May 2,200June 2,200
► Consider the discount offering in off-peak month of January. The demand forecast is shown below:
► Discounting a unit from $40 to $39 results in the period demand’s increasing by 10 percent because of increased consumption or substitution. Further, 20 percent of each of the two following months demand is moved forward.
Microsoft Office 2010多媒體藝廊
6
Andy Guo
Scenario 4: Aggregate Planning and Promotion at Red Tomato
Month Demand ForecastJanuary 3,000February 2,400
March 2,560
April 3,800May 2,200June 2,200
► Consider the discount offering in off-peak month of January. The demand forecast is shown below:
► Discounting a unit from $40 to $39 results in the period demand’s increasing by 10 percent because of increased consumption or substitution. Further, 20 percent of each of the two following months demand is moved forward.
7
Andy Guo
Optimal Aggregate Plan for Scenario 4
Periodt
No.Hired
Ht
No. LaidOff Lt
Workforce
Size Wt
OvertimeOt
InventoryIt
StockoutSt
SubcontractCt
TotalProducti
onPt
0 0 0 80 0 1,000 0 0
1 0 15 65 0 610 0 0 2,6102 0 0 65 0 820 0 0 2,6103 0 0 65 0 870 0 0 2,610
4 0 0 65 0 0 320 0 2,6105 0 0 65 0 90 0 0 2,6106 0 0 65 0 500 0 0 2,610
► Total cost over planning horizon = $421,915► Revenue over planning horizon = $643,400► Profit over planning horizon = $221,485
8
Andy Guo
Conclusions based on Scenarios 1, 4 & 5
Scenario 1 Scenario 4 Scenario 5
Cost 422,275 421,915 438,857
Revenue 640,000 643,400 650,140
Profit 217,725 221,485 211,283
9
Andy Guo
Scenario 5: Aggregate Planning and Promotion at Red Tomato
Demand fluctuation has increased relative to the profile in scenario 1.
► Discounting a unit from $40 to $39 results in the period demand’s increasing by 10 percent because of increased consumption or substitution. Further, 20 percent of each of the two following months demand is moved forward.
► Consider the discount offering in peak month of April. The demand forecast is shown below:
Month Demand ForecastJanuary 1,600
February 3,000March 3,200April 5,060
May 1,760June 1,760
Microsoft Office 2010多媒體藝廊
10
Andy Guo
Scenario 5: Aggregate Planning and Promotion at Red Tomato
Demand fluctuation has increased relative to the profile in scenario 1.
► Discounting a unit from $40 to $39 results in the period demand’s increasing by 10 percent because of increased consumption or substitution. Further, 20 percent of each of the two following months demand is moved forward.
► Consider the discount offering in peak month of April. The demand forecast is shown below:
Month Demand ForecastJanuary 1,600
February 3,000March 3,200April 5,060
May 1,760June 1,760
11
Andy Guo
Optimal Aggregate Plan for Scenario 5
Periodt
No.Hired
Ht
No. LaidOff Lt
Workforce
Size Wt
OvertimeOt
InventoryIt
StockoutSt
SubcontractCt
TotalProduc
tionPt
0 0 0 80 0 1,000 0 01 0 14 66 0 2,047 0 0 2,647
2 0 0 66 0 1,693 0 0 2,6473 0 0 66 0 1,140 0 0 2,6474 0 0 66 0 0 1,273 0 2,6475 0 0 66 0 0 387 0 2,647
6 0 0 66 0 500 0 0 2,647
► Total cost over planning horizon = $438,857► Revenue over planning horizon = $650,140► Profit over planning horizon = $211,283
12
Andy Guo
Conclusions based on Scenarios 1, 4 & 5
Scenario 1 Scenario 4 Scenario 5
Cost 422,275 421,915 438,857
Revenue 640,000 643,400 650,140
Profit 217,725 221,485 211,283
13
Andy Guo
Conclusions based on Scenarios 1, 4 & 5
► A price promotion in January (scenario 4) results in a higher profit than no promotion (scenario 1). A promotion in April (scenario 5) results in a lower profit than no promotion (scenario 1).
► Even though revenues are higher when promotions is offered in April, the increase in operating costs makes it a less profitable option.
► Red Tomato should offer the discount in the off-peak month of January.
► The above conclusions could be different if Red Tomato were in a situation in which most of the demand increase comes from market growth or stealing market share rather than forward buying (see scenarios 6 & 7)
► It is not appropriate for a firm to leave pricing decisions solely in the domain of marketing and aggregate planning solely in the domain of operations. It is crucial that forecasts, pricing, and aggregate planning be coordinated in the supply chain.14
Andy Guo
Scenario 6: Aggregate Planning and Promotion at Red Tomato
► Discounting a unit from $40 to $39 results in the period demand’s increasing by 100 percent because of increased consumption or substitution. Further, 20 percent of each of the two following months demand is moved forward.
► Consider the discount offering in off-peak month of January. The demand forecast is shown below:
Month Demand ForecastJanuary 4,440February 2,400
March 2,560April 3,800May 2,200June 2,200
15
Andy Guo
Scenario 6: Aggregate Planning and Promotion at Red Tomato
► Discounting a unit from $40 to $39 results in the period demand’s increasing by 100 percent because of increased consumption or substitution. Further, 20 percent of each of the two following months demand is moved forward.
► Consider the discount offering in off-peak month of January. The demand forecast is shown below:
Month Demand ForecastJanuary 4,440February 2,400
March 2,560April 3,800May 2,200June 2,200
16
Andy Guo
Optimal Aggregate Plan for Scenario 6
Periodt
No.Hired
Ht
No. LaidOff Lt
Workforce
Size Wt
OvertimeOt
InventoryIt
StockoutSt
SubcontractCt
TotalProduc
tionPt
0 0 0 80 0 1,000 0 0
1 0 0 80 0 0 240 0 3,2002 0 11 69 0 140 0 0 2,7803 0 0 69 0 360 0 0 2,780
4 0 0 69 0 0 660 0 2,7805 0 0 69 0 0 80 0 2,7806 0 0 69 0 500 0 0 2,780
► Total cost over planning horizon = $456,750► Revenue over planning horizon = $699,560► Profit over planning horizon = $242,810
17
Andy Guo
Conclusions based on Scenarios 1, 6 & 7
Scenario 1 Scenario 6 Scenario 7
Cost 422,275 456,750 536,200
Revenue 640,000 699,560 783,520
Profit 217,725 242,810 247,320
18
Andy Guo
Scenario 7: Aggregate Planning and Promotion at Red Tomato
Demand fluctuation has increased relative to the profile in scenario 1.
► Discounting a unit from $40 to $39 results in the period demand’s increasing by 100 percent because of increased consumption or substitution. Further, 20 percent of each of the two following months demand is moved forward.
► Consider the discount offering in peak month of April. The demand forecast is shown below:
Month Demand ForecastJanuary 1,600February 3,000
March 3,200April 8,480May 1,760June 1,760
19
Andy Guo
Optimal Aggregate Plan for Scenario 7
Periodt
No.Hired
Ht
No. LaidOff Lt
Workforce
Size Wt
OvertimeOt
InventoryIt
StockoutSt
SubcontractCt
TotalProduction
Pt
0 0 0 80 0 1,000 0 01 0 0 80 0 2,600 0 0 3,200
2 0 0 80 0 2,800 0 0 3,2003 0 0 80 0 2,800 0 0 3,2004 0 0 80 0 0 2,380 100 3,200
5 0 0 80 0 0 940 0 3,2006 0 0 80 0 500 0 0 3,200
► Total cost over planning horizon = $536,200► Revenue over planning horizon = $783,520► Profit over planning horizon = $247,320► When forward buying is a small part of the increase in demand from
discounting, Red Tomato should offer the discount in the peak demand month of April.
20
Andy Guo
Conclusions based on Scenarios 1, 6 & 7
Scenario 1 Scenario 6 Scenario 7
Cost 422,275 456,750 536,200
Revenue 640,000 699,560 783,520
Profit 217,725 242,810 247,320
21
Andy Guo
Performance Under Different Scenarios
Regular Price
Promotion Price
Promotion Period
Percent Increase in
Demand
Percent Forward Buy
Profit Average Inventory
$40 $40 NA NA NA $217,725 895$40 $39 January 20 % 20 % $221,485 523
$40 $39 April 20% 20% $211,283 938$40 $39 January 100% 20% $242,810 208$40 $39 April 100% 20% $247,320 1,492$31 $31 NA NA NA $73,725 895
$31 $30 January 100% 20% $84,410 208$31 $30 April 100% 20% $69,120 1,492
1
4
5
6
7
22
Andy Guo
Conclusions Regarding Promotions
► Pricing and aggregate planning must be done jointly.
► Average inventory increases if a promotion is run during the peak period and decreases if run during off-peak period.
► Promotion during the peak period may decrease overall profitability if a significant fraction of the demand increase results from a forward buy.
► Promotion during the peak period may increase overall profitability if forward buying becomes a smaller fraction of the demand increase.
► As product margin declines, promotion during the peak period becomes less profitable.
23
Andy Guo
Summary of Impact on Promotion Timing
Factor Favored timing
High forward buying Low demand period
High stealing market share High demand period
High growth of market High demand period
High margin High demand period
Low margin Low demand period
High holding costs Low demand period
High cost of changing capacity Low demand period
24
Andy Guo
6, 10本作品轉載自Microsoft Office 2007多媒體藝廊,依據Microsoft 服務合約及著作權法第 46 、 50 、 52 、 65條合理使用。
頁碼 作品 授權條件 作者 /來源
5本作品轉載自Microsoft Office 2007多媒體藝廊,依據Microsoft 服務合約及著作權法第 46 、 50 、 52 、 65條合理使用。
版權聲明
25