planning approval consistency assessment form

33
Unclassified Unclassified Planning Approval Consistency Assessment Form SM-17-00000111 Metro Body of Knowledge (MBoK) Assessment name: S2B Package 4 MCL Single Lane closure - Railway Parade Prepared by: Vanessa Tavares - HSEJV Prepared for: Sydney Metro Assessment number: SWM17 Status: Draft Version: 1.1 Planning approval: SSI 8256 Date required: 28/06/2021 iCentral number: SM-21-00197848 © Sydney Metro 2020 For information – do not alter: Applicable to: Sydney Metro Document Owner: Director, Environment, Sustainability & Planning System Owner: Deputy Chief Executive, Operations, Customer & Place-making Status: Final Version: 3.0 Date of issue: 27 November 2020 © Sydney Metro 2020

Upload: others

Post on 04-Feb-2022

7 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Unclassified

Unclassified

Planning Approval Consistency Assessment Form SM-17-00000111

Metro Body of Knowledge (MBoK)

Assessment name: S2B Package 4 MCL Single Lane closure - Railway Parade

Prepared by: Vanessa Tavares - HSEJV

Prepared for: Sydney Metro

Assessment number: SWM17

Status: Draft

Version: 1.1

Planning approval: SSI 8256

Date required: 28/06/2021

iCentral number: SM-21-00197848

© Sydney Metro 2020

For information – do not alter:

Applicable to: Sydney Metro

Document Owner: Director, Environment, Sustainability & Planning

System Owner: Deputy Chief Executive, Operations, Customer & Place-making

Status: Final

Version: 3.0

Date of issue: 27 November 2020

© Sydney Metro 2020

Unclassified

Metro Body of Knowledge (MBoK)

(Uncontrolled when printed)

© Sydney Metro 2020 Unclassified Page 2 of 23

SM-17-00000111 CA002 Lakemba Lane Closure

Table of contents 1. Existing Approved Project ................................................................................................ 3 

2. Description of proposed development/activity/works ................................................... 7 

3. Timeframe ........................................................................................................................... 8 

4. Site description .................................................................................................................. 8 

5. Site Environmental Characteristics ................................................................................. 9 

6. Justification for the proposed works ............................................................................... 9 

7. Environmental Benefit ..................................................................................................... 10 

8. Control Measures ............................................................................................................. 10 

9. Climate Change Impacts ................................................................................................. 10 

10. Impact Assessment – Construction ............................................................................. 11 

11. Impact Assessment – Operation .................................................................................. 16 

12. Consistency with the Approved Project ...................................................................... 18 

13. Other Environmental Approvals ................................................................................... 19 

Author certification .............................................................................................................. 20 

Environmental Representative Review .............................................................................. 20 

Appendix A ........................................................................................................................... 22 

Appendix B ........................................................................................................................... 23 

Unclassified

Metro Body of Knowledge (MBoK)

(Uncontrolled when printed)

© Sydney Metro 2020 Unclassified Page 3 of 23

SM-17-00000111 CA002 Lakemba Lane Closure

The Planning Approval Consistency Assessment Form should be completed in accordance with SM-17-00000103 Planning Approval Consistency Assessment Procedure.

1. Existing Approved Project

Planning approval reference details (Application/Document No. (including modifications)):

SSI 8256 Sydney Metro City & Southwest – Sydenham to Bankstown (S2B)

Mod 1 Revised station design for Bankstown Station

Date of determination:

Infrastructure Approval date 12 December 2018

Modification 1 Approval date 22 October 2020

Type of planning approval:

Critical State Significant Infrastructure

Unclassified

Metro Body of Knowledge (MBoK)

(Uncontrolled when printed)

© Sydney Metro 2020 Unclassified Page 4 of 23

SM-17-00000111 CA002 Lakemba Lane Closure

Description of existing approved project you are assessing for consistency:

The Marrickville, Canterbury and Lakemba Station Upgrades (MCL) is one of the stages of the Sydenham to Bankstown upgrade (herein referred to as the Southwest Metro (SWM) Project) as described in the project’s delivery strategy. The MCL upgrades to Sydney Metro standards correspond to work package No. 4 which are being undertaken by Haslin / Stephen Edwards Joint Venture(HSE JV). Station Upgrades Below is a description of the Construction scope for the Lakemba Station:

Refurbish and repurpose rooms of existing platform buildings; Refurbish concourse area; Construction of the Sydney Metro Services Building adjacent to Railway Parade; Regrade platform as per SM's requirement and provide drainage, platform screen doors, platform edge screens and mechanical gap

fillers to Platform 1 and 2; New cabling and containment for LV services and lighting; Installation of new glass screens to existing concourse and footbridge; Provide new landscaped plaza at Railway Parade including additional bicycle hoops and feature paving; Installation of new vertical protection screens to both sides of the existing Haldon Street Bridge; Minor refresh of existing entry concourse stairs; Installation of new CSR cable route; and Installation of security fencing. As depicted in the S2B EIS, Compound C14 from the EIS there is a current proposal to use The

Boulevarde The Sydenham to Bankstown Planning Approval currently assesses and permits the establishment of two site compounds at Lakemba to support the Construction of the Project. One of them includes a portion of the carparking area on Railway Parade identified as C14 (refer to Figure below). It is noted that Compound C14, as identified in the EIS, utilises a portion of the proposed Railway Parade car parking area, which has been extended through a consistency assessment (AF-HSE-001). This proposal addresses the request for a lane on Railway Parade to be used for materials loading and unloading to facilitate construction of Lakemba Station Upgrade under the Sydenham to Bankstown upgrade project.

Unclassified

Metro Body of Knowledge (MBoK)

(Uncontrolled when printed)

© Sydney Metro 2020 Unclassified Page 5 of 23

SM-17-00000111 CA002 Lakemba Lane Closure

Unclassified

Metro Body of Knowledge (MBoK)

(Uncontrolled when printed)

© Sydney Metro 2020 Unclassified Page 6 of 23

SM-17-00000111 CA002 Lakemba Lane Closure

Relevant background information (including EA, REF, Submissions Report, Director General’s Report, MCoA):

The Sydney Metro City & Southwest – Sydenham to Bankstown – State Significant Infrastructure Assessment (SSI 8256), dated 12th December 2018

The Sydney Metro City & Southwest – Sydenham to Bankstown - Environmental Impact Statement , dated 7th September 2017;

The Sydney Metro City & Southwest – Sydenham to Bankstown – Submissions and Preferred Infrastructure Report, June 2018;

The Sydney Metro City & Southwest – Sydenham to Bankstown – Submissions Report, September 2018;

The Sydney Metro City & Southwest – Sydenham to Bankstown – Instrument of Approval, dated 12th December 2018

The Sydney Metro City & Southwest – Sydenham to Bankstown – Modification 1 – Bankstown Station, 22nd October 2020

All proposed works identified in this assessment would be undertaken in accordance with the mitigation measures identified in the EIS, Submissions and Preferred Infrastructure Report, the Submission Report and the conditions of approval.

Unclassified

Metro Body of Knowledge (MBoK)

(Uncontrolled when printed)

© Sydney Metro 2020 Unclassified Page 7 of 23

SM-17-00000111 CA002 Lakemba Lane Closure

2. Description of proposed development/activity/works

Describe ancillary activities, duration of work, working hours, machinery, staffing levels, impacts on utilities/authorities, wastes generated or hazardous substances/dangerous goods used.

This Planning Approval Consistency Assessment (PACA) relates to the occupation of portion of Railway Parade, Lakemba between the western end of the commuter carpark and the pedestrian crossing past the junction of Croydon St and Railway Parade. This will require closure of the westbound lane adjacent to the HSE JV compound area.

The proposed area would be used intermittently during the construction period associated with the project, mostly during possessions and shutdowns. This land is located outside, but adjacent to the Project Boundary as defined by the EIS/SPIR. Figure below (see Appendix A) identifies the proposed area in purple.

The temporary use of Railway Parade (lane closest to the train station only) is required for material loading and unloading using bogie trucks.

The proposed area in appendix A is on land owned by the Canterbury-Bankstown City Council and a relevant ROL and Traffic Control Plan has been approved, located in Appendix B. HSE JV have reviewed local bus routes and have determined that there are no impacts to local buses or temporary transport buses. No change to project staffing levels are expected during construction.

Upon completion of works the proposed area would be reinstated to the public.

There are no known utility impacts as part of the full road closure activity.

There will be no waste associated with the lane closure. No hazardous or dangerous goods will be used for the lane closures.

Unclassified

Metro Body of Knowledge (MBoK)

(Uncontrolled when printed)

© Sydney Metro 2020 Unclassified Page 8 of 23

SM-17-00000111 CA002 Lakemba Lane Closure

3. Timeframe

When will the proposed change take place? For how long?

The lane closures will occur intermittently between the 28th of June and the remaining construction period associated with the project, mostly during rail possessions and shutdowns, or when materials deliveries or removal are required in this area.

HSE JV will endeavour to finish the works in as short a time as possible and reopen the lane.

4. Site description

Provide a description of the site on which the proposed works are to be carried out, including, Lot and Deposited Plan details, where available. Map to be included here or as an appendix. Detail of land owner.

The proposed area is located within the road reserve on land owned by the Canterbury-Bankstown City Council. As such there are no Lot and Deposited Plan details.

Unclassified

Metro Body of Knowledge (MBoK)

(Uncontrolled when printed)

© Sydney Metro 2020 Unclassified Page 9 of 23

SM-17-00000111 CA002 Lakemba Lane Closure

5. Site Environmental Characteristics

Describe the environment (i.e., vegetation, nearby waterways, land use, surrounding land use), identify likely presence of protected flora/fauna and sensitive area.

The environment at Railway Parade, Lakemba can be described as typical urban street scape. The roadway is bordered by gutters, footpath, and private property. Nearby vegetation consists of planted trees and weeds on the rail batter. No vegetation would be impacted as a result of the lane closure.

Rainfall runoff from the area enters stormwater pits located within the kerb side gutter. Land surrounding the lane closure area location consists of the commuter car park (currently occupied by HSE JV) to the south and residential property to the north.

Australian Ibis have been known to roost within trees nearby. There will be no known impacts to the ibis.

There is no known protected flora or fauna in the vicinity. There are no known other sensitive receivers in the area.

HSE JV will restore the area to it’s pre-existing condition upon completion of the works.

6. Justification for the proposed works

Address the need for the proposed works, whether there are alternatives to the proposed works (and why these are not appropriate), and the consequences with not proceeding with the proposed work.

This proposal seeks additional space required to provide a safe area for truck movements when loading and unloading materials, achieved by reducing and containing heavy vehicle movement on site to the area described.

Unclassified

Metro Body of Knowledge (MBoK)

(Uncontrolled when printed)

© Sydney Metro 2020 Unclassified Page 10 of 23

SM-17-00000111 CA002 Lakemba Lane Closure

7. Environmental Benefit

Identify whether there are environmental benefits associated with the proposed works. If so, provide details:

The benefit of the road encroachment is to facilitate the works required by HSEJV, the additional space will allow the contractor to work effectively and minimise community interface locations.

8. Control Measures

Will a project and site specific EMP be prepared? Are appropriate control measures already identified in an existing EMP?

Works will be completed under the project Construction Traffic Management Plan (CTMP), Construction Environmental Management Plan (CEMP) and sub-plans, including the Construction Noise and Vibration Management Plan (CNVMP), Construction Heritage Management Plan (CHMP), Construction Soil and Water Management Plan (CSWMP), and Community Consultation Strategy (CCS).

9. Climate Change Impacts

Is the site likely to be adversely affected by the impacts of climate change? If yes, what adaptation/mitigation measures will be incorporated into the design?

No changes to climate change impacts.

Unclassified

Metro Body of Knowledge (MBoK)

(Uncontrolled when printed)

© Sydney Metro 2020 Unclassified Page 11 of 23

SM-17-00000111 CA002 Lakemba Lane Closure

10. Impact Assessment – Construction

Attach supporting evidence in the Appendices if required. Make reference to the relevant Appendix if used.

Aspect

Nature and extent of impacts (negative and positive) during construction (if control

measures implemented) of the proposed/activity, relative to the Approved Project

Proposed Control Measures in addition to project COA and

REMMs

Minimal Impact

Y/N

Endorsed

Y/N Comments

Flora and fauna No change from approved project as detailed in the EIS and SPIR.

No additional measures required. Y

Water

No change from approved project as detailed in the EIS and SPIR.

No change from the EIS and SPIR.

Erosion and Sediment Control Plans shall be updated to include controls required in this area.

Comply with mitigation measures as stated within the CEMP and CEMP sub-plans.

Y

Air quality

There will be minor localised dust impacts from vehicle and material movements, the extent of which is considered to be consistent with the impacts assessed within the EIS/SPIR.

No additional measures required.

Y

Y

Y

Y

Unclassified

Metro Body of Knowledge (MBoK)

(Uncontrolled when printed)

© Sydney Metro 2020 Unclassified Page 12 of 23

SM-17-00000111 CA002 Lakemba Lane Closure

Aspect

Nature and extent of impacts (negative and positive) during construction (if control

measures implemented) of the proposed/activity, relative to the Approved Project

Proposed Control Measures in addition to project COA and

REMMs

Minimal Impact

Y/N

Endorsed

Y/N Comments

Noise vibration

Minimal impacts. Works will be consistent with already approved activities as detailed in the EIS and SPIR.

The controls within the Construction Noise and Vibration Management Plan (CNVMP) address construction material deliveries which are considered relevant to the proposal.

Railway Parade lane would be used intermittently during construction and although the location has a minor reduction in separation from receivers (i.e. approx. 5-10m) the use of the location will not involve construction works but rather facilitate works

on the station intermittently throughout possessions and shutdowns during the construction period.

Implementation of control measures as per the CEMP, CNVMP and OOHW.

Mitigation and respite will be applied in accordance with the CNVMP and Sydney Metro Construction Noise and Vibration Strategy (CNVS).

Y

Indigenous heritage

The temporary use of the Railway Parade does not go below the existing ground surface and therefore no potential to impact Aboriginal Heritage.

The site will operate under an unexpected finds protocol should indigenous heritage be encountered.

No additional measures required.

Y

Non-indigenous heritage

A number of buildings within the Lakemba Station precinct surrounding these works are heritage listed, however the use of Railway Parade will not have an impact to any known heritage items or places. The proposal is considered to be consistent with the assessment within the EIS which considered the visual impact of the road use, noting it is temporary in nature and are unlikely to impact the heritage significance of the station or precinct.

Additionally, the temporary use of this land does not go below the ground surface and therefore no potential to impact Non-Aboriginal archaeology.

No additional measures required.

Y

Y

Y

Y

Unclassified

Metro Body of Knowledge (MBoK)

(Uncontrolled when printed)

© Sydney Metro 2020 Unclassified Page 13 of 23

SM-17-00000111 CA002 Lakemba Lane Closure

Aspect

Nature and extent of impacts (negative and positive) during construction (if control

measures implemented) of the proposed/activity, relative to the Approved Project

Proposed Control Measures in addition to project COA and

REMMs

Minimal Impact

Y/N

Endorsed

Y/N Comments

Community and stakeholder

The proposed lane closure may cause temporary disruption to community members and stakeholders, particularly those that live adjacent to the works. Refer to the Traffic aspect and noise and vibration aspect for further details.

No pedestrian pathways or private property access will be impacted by the proposed lane closure.

Support to utilise the land has been received with the landholder (Canterbury Bankstown City Council). See Appendix C.

Ongoing consultation and notification as per the Community Communications Strategy (CCS).

Implementation of control measures as per the CEMP, CEMP sub-plans, CCS and CTMP

Y

Traffic

The lane closure at Railway Parade will likely cause traffic impacts for vehicles using this road, as only one lane will be accessible for traffic. Signage and traffic controllers will direct traffic along the detour as per the Traffic Control Plans in Appendix B.

Traffic management will be in place during the lane closure and as heavy vehicles access the site.

Construction access route will be consistent with the existing CTMP.

It is noted that no formal pedestrian access (i.e., no footpath) exists on the eastern side of Railway Parade adjacent to the proposed lane. This is considered to have minimal impacts on pedestrians.

Access to private properties will not be impacted by the lane closure, although there is potential for minimal queuing while traffic is reduced to a single lane.

Implementation of control measures as per the CEMP, CTMP. The CTMP will be updated to include the lane area once approved.

A valid ROL issued by CoCB must be in place – any requirements of this permit must be implemented.

Traffic Control Plans must be implemented, including appropriate signage and traffic controllers as required. Consultation with any agencies identified within REMM TC3 will occur.

Pedestrians will be directed to utilise formal pedestrian access areas and roadway crossings located on Railway Parade.

Y

Y

Y

Unclassified

Metro Body of Knowledge (MBoK)

(Uncontrolled when printed)

© Sydney Metro 2020 Unclassified Page 14 of 23

SM-17-00000111 CA002 Lakemba Lane Closure

Aspect

Nature and extent of impacts (negative and positive) during construction (if control

measures implemented) of the proposed/activity, relative to the Approved Project

Proposed Control Measures in addition to project COA and

REMMs

Minimal Impact

Y/N

Endorsed

Y/N Comments

Waste No change from the EIS and SPIR. No additional measures required.

Y

Social As above for Community and Stakeholder. No additional measures required.

Y

Economic No change from the EIS and SPIR. No additional measures required.

Y

Visual

The lane closure, traffic controls and heavy vehicles will be visible. The visual aspects of these activities is to be expected as part of a major construction project and an operating rail corridor. The impacts will be temporary only and are consistent with large infrastructure projects.

Some light spill may occur from the works, either from lighting towers or heavy vehicles. Light spill will be minimised by pointing lights away from residential properties and the roadway, towards the works.

Visual aspects are considered to be consistent with the EIS and SPIR.

No additional measures required.

Visual impacts are to be managed in accordance with the Visual Amenity Management Plan.

Y

Urban design No change from the EIS and SPIR No additional measures required.

Y

Geotechnical No change from the EIS and SPIR No additional measures required.

Y

Land use The temporary occupation of Railway Pde is consistent with information provided within the EIS.

No additional measures required. Y

Climate Change No change from the EIS and SPIR No additional measures required.

Y

Risk No change from the EIS and SPIR No additional measures required.

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Unclassified

Metro Body of Knowledge (MBoK)

(Uncontrolled when printed)

© Sydney Metro 2020 Unclassified Page 15 of 23

SM-17-00000111 CA002 Lakemba Lane Closure

Aspect

Nature and extent of impacts (negative and positive) during construction (if control

measures implemented) of the proposed/activity, relative to the Approved Project

Proposed Control Measures in addition to project COA and

REMMs

Minimal Impact

Y/N

Endorsed

Y/N Comments

Other No change from the EIS and SPIR No additional measures required.

Y

Management and mitigation measures

No change from the EIS and SPIR No additional measures required. Y

Y

Y

Unclassified

Metro Body of Knowledge (MBoK)

(Uncontrolled when printed)

© Sydney Metro 2020 Unclassified Page 16 of 23

SM-17-00000111 CA002 Lakemba Lane Closure

11. Impact Assessment – Operation

Attach supporting evidence in the Appendix if required. Make reference to the relevant Appendix if used.

Aspect

Nature and extent of impacts (negative and positive) during operation (if control measures implemented) of the proposed activity/works,

relative to the Approved Project

Proposed Control Measures in addition to project COA and

REMMs

Minimal Impact

Y/N

Endorsed

Y/N Comments

Flora and fauna No change from the EIS and SPIR N/A

Water No change from the EIS and SPIR N/A

Air quality No change from the EIS and SPIR N/A

Noise vibration No change from the EIS and SPIR N/A

Indigenous heritage No change from the EIS and SPIR N/A

Non-indigenous heritage No change from the EIS and SPIR N/A

Community and stakeholder No change from the EIS and SPIR N/A

Traffic No change from the EIS and SPIR N/A

Waste No change from the EIS and SPIR N/A

Social No change from the EIS and SPIR N/A

Economic No change from the EIS and SPIR N/A

Visual No change from the EIS and SPIR N/A

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Unclassified

Metro Body of Knowledge (MBoK)

(Uncontrolled when printed)

© Sydney Metro 2020 Unclassified Page 17 of 23

SM-17-00000111 CA002 Lakemba Lane Closure

Aspect

Nature and extent of impacts (negative and positive) during operation (if control measures implemented) of the proposed activity/works,

relative to the Approved Project

Proposed Control Measures in addition to project COA and

REMMs

Minimal Impact

Y/N

Endorsed

Y/N Comments

Urban design No change from the EIS and SPIR N/A

Geotechnical No change from the EIS and SPIR N/A

Land use No change from the EIS and SPIR N/A

Climate Change No change from the EIS and SPIR N/A

Risk No change from the EIS and SPIR N/A

Other No change from the EIS and SPIR N/A

Management and mitigation measures

No change from the EIS and SPIR N/A

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Unclassified

Metro Body of Knowledge (MBoK)

(Uncontrolled when printed)

© Sydney Metro 2020 Unclassified Page 18 of 23

SM-17-00000111 CA002 Lakemba Lane Closure

12. Consistency with the Approved Project

Based on a review and understanding of the existing Approved Project and the proposed modifications, is there is a transformation of the Project?

No. The proposed works would not transform the project, they will facilitate it. The project would continue to provide a new metro rail line between Sydenham and Bankstown.

Is the project as modified consistent with the objectives and functions of the Approved Project as a whole?

Yes. The proposed works would be consistent with the objectives and functions of the approved project.

Is the project as modified consistent with the objectives and functions of elements of the Approved Project?

Yes. The changes identified in this assessment are temporary and are consistent with the objectives and functions of the Approved Project.

Are there any new environmental impacts as a result of the proposed works/modifications?

No new environmental impacts are introduced as part of the proposed use of Railway Parade. All impacts are adequately addressed through the application of the mitigation measures in the above tables, the EIS and construction environmental management plan for the project.

Is the project as modified consistent with the conditions of approval?

Yes. The proposed works would be consistent with the conditions of approval.

Are the impacts of the proposed activity/works known and understood?

Yes. The impacts of the proposed works are understood.

Are the impacts of the proposed activity/works able to be managed so as not to have an adverse impact?

Yes. The impacts of the proposed works can be managed so as to avoid an adverse impact.

Unclassified

Metro Body of Knowledge (MBoK)

(Uncontrolled when printed)

© Sydney Metro 2020 Unclassified Page 19 of 23

SM-17-00000111 CA002 Lakemba Lane Closure

13. Other Environmental Approvals

Identify all other approvals required for the project: Consultation with Canterbury Bankstown City Council has been undertaken, and Traffic Control Plans and Road Occupancy Licenses approved. Council has noted support for the temporary use of Railway Parade see Appendix B.

Unclassified

Metro Body of Knowledge (MBoK)

(Uncontrolled when printed)

© Sydney Metro 2020 Unclassified Page 20 of 23

SM-17-00000111 CA002 Lakemba Lane Closure

Author certification

To be completed by person preparing checklist.

I certify that to the best of my knowledge this Consistency Checklist:

Examines and takes into account the fullest extent possible all matters affecting or likely to affectthe environment as a result of activities associated with the Proposed Revision; and

Examines the consistency of the Proposed Revision with the Approved Project; is accurate in allmaterial respects and does not omit any material information.

Name: Vanessa Tavares

Signature:

Title: Environmental Manager

Company: HSE JV Date: 24/06/2021

This section is for Sydney Metro only.

Application supported and submitted by

Name: Yvette Buchli Date:

Title: Associate Director, Planning Approvals

Comments:

Signature:

25/06/2021

Unclassified

Metro Body of Knowledge (MBoK)

(Uncontrolled when printed)

© Sydney Metro 2020 Unclassified Page 21 of 23

SM-17-00000111 CA002 Lakemba Lane Closure

Based on the above assessment, are the impacts and scope of the proposed activity/modification consistent with the existing Approved Project?

Yes � The proposed activity/works are consistent and no further assessment is required.

No � The proposed works/activity is not consistent with the Approved Project. A modification or a newactivity approval/ consent is required. Advise Project Manager of appropriate alternative planning approvals pathway to be undertaken.

Endorsed by

Name: Fil Cerone Date:

Title:

Director, City & Southwest, Sustainability Environment and Planning Comments:

Signature:

x

25 June 2021

Unclassified

Metro Body of Knowledge (MBoK)

(Uncontrolled when printed)

© Sydney Metro 2020 Unclassified Page 22 of 23

SM-17-00000111 CA002 Lakemba Lane Closure

Appendix A – Site Location

Unclassified

Metro Body of Knowledge (MBoK)

(Uncontrolled when printed)

© Sydney Metro 2020 Unclassified Page 23 of 23

SM-17-00000111 CA002 Lakemba Lane Closure

Appendix B – Traffic Control Plan and ROL

SHEET 2

SCALE:

OF

DESIGNER

Plot Date: Cad File No:7 February 2021 - 8:32 PM C:\Users\Alex\OneDrive - USQ\00_Civlink Consulting\07_Projects\20200612 - Wahroonga Station Bridge\10_TCPs\HAS-LAK-40001-P1.dwg

DRAWN BY:

DRW CHECK:

APPROVED:

IND REVIEW:

DRAWING No:

SHEET

REVISIONHEIGHT DATUM:COORDINATE SYSTEM:

CLIENT

HASLIN CONSTRUCTIONS - LAKEMBA STATION UPGRADE

RAILWAY PARADE SHOULDER / PARKING CLOSUREADJACENT STATION AT CROYDON W/ STOP/SLOW

LOCALITY PLAN

HAS-LAK-40001-P1

1 2

P1N/A

LP

LP

LP

SCALE:

OF

DESIGNER

Plot Date: Cad File No:7 February 2021 - 8:32 PM C:\Users\Alex\OneDrive - USQ\00_Civlink Consulting\07_Projects\20200612 - Wahroonga Station Bridge\10_TCPs\HAS-LAK-40001-P1.dwg

DRAWN BY:

DRW CHECK:

APPROVED:

IND REVIEW:

DRAWING No:

SHEET

REVISIONHEIGHT DATUM:COORDINATE SYSTEM:

CLIENT

HASLIN CONSTRUCTIONS - LAKEMBA STATION UPGRADE

RAILWAY PARADE SHOULDER / PARKING CLOSUREADJACENT STATION AT CROYDON W/ STOP/SLOW

TRAFFIC GUIDANCE SCHEME

HAS-LAK-40001-P1

2 2

P1N/A

LP

LP

LP

S

H

E

E

T

2

121 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

A

B

C

D

E

F

G

H

A

B

C

D

E

F

G

H

SCALE:

OF

APPD.DESCRIPTIONBYREV DATE

DESIGNER

Plot Date: Cad File No:7 February 2021 - 5:19 PM C:\Users\Alex\OneDrive - USQ\00_Civlink Consulting\07_Projects\20200612 - Wahroonga Station Bridge\10_TCPs\HAS-LAK-40002-P1.dwg

DRAWN BY:

DRW CHECK:

APPROVED:

IND REVIEW:

DRAWING No:

SHEET

REVISIONHEIGHT DATUM:COORDINATE SYSTEM:

CLIENT

HASLIN CONSTRUCTIONS - LAKEMBA STATION UPGRADE

RAILWAY PARADE LANE CLOSURE W/ STOP/SLOWADJACENT STATION AT CROYDON PLANT DELIVERY

LOCALITY PLAN

HAS-LAK-40002-P1

1 2

P1N/A

LP

LP

LP

LP 07.02.21P1 ORIGINAL ISSUE LP

AutoCAD SHX Text
LOCATION CHECKLIST
AutoCAD SHX Text
ROAD: .......................................... LOCATION: .......................................................................... .......................................... LOCATION: .......................................................................... LOCATION: .......................................................................... .......................................................................... TYPE OF WORK: .............................................................................................................................................. .............................................................................................................................................. DATE: ......../......../20...... TIME: ........:.......... COMPLETED BY: .........................................../......../20...... TIME: ........:.......... COMPLETED BY: ...................................TIME: ........:.......... COMPLETED BY: ...........................................:.......... COMPLETED BY: ...................................COMPLETED BY: ......................................................................
AutoCAD SHX Text
1.
AutoCAD SHX Text
HAS PROVISION BEEN MADE FOR ANY INTERSECTIONS, ON-LOADING OR OFF-LOADING RAMPS WITHIN THE WORKSITE?
AutoCAD SHX Text
YES/NO/NA
AutoCAD SHX Text
2.
AutoCAD SHX Text
WILL VEHICLES BE ENTERING OR LEAVING THE WORKSITE FROM PRIVATE OR COMMERCIAL DRIVEWAYS? HAS PROVISION BEEN MADE FOR THOSE VEHICLES?
AutoCAD SHX Text
YES/NO/NA YES/NO/NA
AutoCAD SHX Text
3.
AutoCAD SHX Text
IS THERE ADEQUATE SIGHT DISTANCE FOR ROAD USERS TO SIGNS AND TRAFFIC CONTROLLERS?
AutoCAD SHX Text
YES/NO/NA
AutoCAD SHX Text
4.
AutoCAD SHX Text
WILL CONTROL MEASURES BE SAFE FOR THE APPROACH SPEEDS OF TRAFFIC?
AutoCAD SHX Text
YES/NO/NA
AutoCAD SHX Text
5.
AutoCAD SHX Text
HAS CONSIDERATION BEEN GIVEN TO TRAFFIC VOLUMES EXPECTED?
AutoCAD SHX Text
YES/NO/NA
AutoCAD SHX Text
6.
AutoCAD SHX Text
HAS PROVISION BEEN MADE FOR BUS STOPS (INCLUDING SCHOOL) ?
AutoCAD SHX Text
YES/NO/NA
AutoCAD SHX Text
7.
AutoCAD SHX Text
HAS PROVISION BEEN MADE FOR PEDESTRIANS INCLUDING THOSE WITH IMPAIRMENTS ?
AutoCAD SHX Text
YES/NO/NA
AutoCAD SHX Text
8.
AutoCAD SHX Text
HAS PROVISION BEEN MADE FOR CYCLISTS?
AutoCAD SHX Text
YES/NO/NA
AutoCAD SHX Text
9.
AutoCAD SHX Text
ARE THERE ANY OVERHEAD POWER LINES THAT MIGHT BE A RISK TO CONSTRUCTION VEHICLES AND PLANT?
AutoCAD SHX Text
YES/NO/NA
AutoCAD SHX Text
10.
AutoCAD SHX Text
HAS THE TIME OF DAY BEEN ADEQUATELY CONSIDERED (IE NIGHT WORK, LOW SETTING SUN) ?
AutoCAD SHX Text
YES/NO/NA
AutoCAD SHX Text
WHERE 'NO' HAS BEEN ANSWERED TO ITEMS 1 - 10 ABOVE, LIST ITEM # BELOW AND CORRECTIVE ACTION TAKEN IN ADDRESSING THE ISSUE.
AutoCAD SHX Text
ITEM #
AutoCAD SHX Text
ACTION TAKEN
AutoCAD SHX Text
APPROVED BY NAME: L. PEAU PWTMP CARD: 0051923852 SIGN: DATE:
AutoCAD SHX Text
1.26.2021
AutoCAD SHX Text
- THIS TCP HAS BEEN PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TCAWS MANUAL V6 2020. THIS TCP HAS BEEN PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TCAWS MANUAL V6 2020. - THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ENSURE ALL ROAD OCCUPANCY PERMITS AND SPEED ZONE THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ENSURE ALL ROAD OCCUPANCY PERMITS AND SPEED ZONE AUTHORISATION REQUIREMENTS ARE SATISFIED PRIOR IMPLEMENTATION OF THIS TCP. -- ANY EXISTING SIGNAGE THAT CONFLICTS WITH THIS TCP MUST BE COVERED AT ANY EXISTING SIGNAGE THAT CONFLICTS WITH THIS TCP MUST BE COVERED AT THE START OF OPERATION AND UNCOVERED AT THE COMPLETION. - THE SITE MUST COMPLY WITH THE TRAFFIC CONTROL AT WORK SITES MANUAL V6 2020 THE SITE MUST COMPLY WITH THE TRAFFIC CONTROL AT WORK SITES MANUAL V6 2020 EDITION AND A.S. 1742.3 - LOCATION CHECKLIST MUST BE COMPLETED FOR ALL WORKSITES LOCATION CHECKLIST MUST BE COMPLETED FOR ALL WORKSITES - SIGNS TO BE POSITIONED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TCAWS MANUAL V6 2020. SIGNS TO BE POSITIONED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TCAWS MANUAL V6 2020. - TRAFFIC CONTROLLERS TO BE POSITIONED WHERE THEY CAN MAINTAIN A CLEAR TRAFFIC CONTROLLERS TO BE POSITIONED WHERE THEY CAN MAINTAIN A CLEAR ESCAPE PATH. - 30km/h SPEED RESTRICTION USED WHERE 1.5m CLEARANCE CANNOT BE ACHIEVED. 30km/h SPEED RESTRICTION USED WHERE 1.5m CLEARANCE CANNOT BE ACHIEVED. - THIS TCP USE IS LIMITED TO THAT OF HASLIN CONSTRUCTIONS AND THEIR ASSOCIATED THIS TCP USE IS LIMITED TO THAT OF HASLIN CONSTRUCTIONS AND THEIR ASSOCIATED SUBCONTRACTORS, TRAFFIC CONTROL PROVIDERS AND FOR THE PROJECT REFERENCED.
AutoCAD SHX Text
GENERAL NOTES

AH

EA

D

RO

AD

WO

RK

AH

EA

D

40

PR

EP

AR

E

TO

ST

OP

RO

AD

WO

RK

40

PREPARE

TO

STOP

ROAD

WORK

40

RO

AD

WO

RK

40

EN

D

RO

AD

WO

RK

50END

ROAD

WORK

50E

ND

RO

AD

WO

RK

50

PR

EP

AR

E

TO

ST

OP

AH

EA

D

RO

AD

WO

RK

AH

EA

D

40

AHEAD

ROAD

WORK

AHEAD

40

AHEAD

ROAD

WORK

AHEAD

40

AHEAD

ROAD

WORK

AHEAD

40

AHEAD

ROAD

WORK

AHEAD

40

121 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

A

B

C

D

E

F

G

H

A

B

C

D

E

F

G

H

SCALE:

OF

APPD.DESCRIPTIONBYREV DATE

DESIGNER

Plot Date: Cad File No:7 February 2021 - 5:19 PM C:\Users\Alex\OneDrive - USQ\00_Civlink Consulting\07_Projects\20200612 - Wahroonga Station Bridge\10_TCPs\HAS-LAK-40002-P1.dwg

DRAWN BY:

DRW CHECK:

APPROVED:

IND REVIEW:

DRAWING No:

SHEET

REVISIONHEIGHT DATUM:COORDINATE SYSTEM:

CLIENT

HASLIN CONSTRUCTIONS - LAKEMBA STATION UPGRADE

RAILWAY PARADE LANE CLOSURE W/ STOP/SLOWADJACENT STATION AT CROYDON PLANT DELIVERY

TRAFFIC GUIDANCE SCHEME

HAS-LAK-40002-P1

2 2

P1N/A

LP

LP

LP

LP 07.02.21P1 ORIGINAL ISSUE LP

AutoCAD SHX Text
THE BOULEVARDE
AutoCAD SHX Text
THE BOULEVARDE
AutoCAD SHX Text
RAILWAY PARADE
AutoCAD SHX Text
RAILWAY PARADE
AutoCAD SHX Text
HALDON ST
AutoCAD SHX Text
CROYDON ST
AutoCAD SHX Text
TM1 GM9-79
AutoCAD SHX Text
T5-5
AutoCAD SHX Text
T1-24 T1-18
AutoCAD SHX Text
T1-5 RM4-212n
AutoCAD SHX Text
T1-24 T1-18
AutoCAD SHX Text
T1-5 RM4-212n
AutoCAD SHX Text
T1-5 RM4-212n
AutoCAD SHX Text
TM2-17 RM4-1
AutoCAD SHX Text
TM2-17 RM4-1
AutoCAD SHX Text
TM2-17 RM4-1
AutoCAD SHX Text
T1-24 T1-18
AutoCAD SHX Text
T5-5
AutoCAD SHX Text
TM1 GM9-79
AutoCAD SHX Text
TM1 GM9-79
AutoCAD SHX Text
TM1 GM9-79
AutoCAD SHX Text
TM1 GM9-79
AutoCAD SHX Text
TM1 GM9-79
AutoCAD SHX Text
LEGEND
AutoCAD SHX Text
WORK AREA
AutoCAD SHX Text
PEDESTRIAN DETOUR ROUTE
AutoCAD SHX Text
CLOSED PEDESTRIAN PATH
AutoCAD SHX Text
PEDESTRIAN BARRICADE / PHYSICAL BARRIER
AutoCAD SHX Text
TRAFFIC CONTROLLER
AutoCAD SHX Text
TRAFFIC CONE / BOLLARD
AutoCAD SHX Text
TEMPORARY SIGN POSITION
AutoCAD SHX Text
SITE ACCESS / EGRESS
AutoCAD SHX Text
APPROVED BY NAME: L. PEAU PWTMP CARD: 0051923852 SIGN: DATE:
AutoCAD SHX Text
1.26.2021
AutoCAD SHX Text
- SIGN INSTALLATION MUST NOT OBSTRUCT EXISTING FOOTPATHS AND SIGHT DISTANCES SIGN INSTALLATION MUST NOT OBSTRUCT EXISTING FOOTPATHS AND SIGHT DISTANCES FOR VEHICLES TURNING OUT OF RESIDENTIAL DRIVEWAYS. - SIGNS SHOULD BE INSTALLED AT APPROXIMATELY 90 DEGREES TO APPROACHING SIGNS SHOULD BE INSTALLED AT APPROXIMATELY 90 DEGREES TO APPROACHING TRAFFIC - WHERE MULTI-MESSAGE SIGNS ARE USED NO PANELS CAN HAVE VOIDS WHERE MULTI-MESSAGE SIGNS ARE USED NO PANELS CAN HAVE VOIDS -
AutoCAD SHX Text
SITE INSTALLATION NOTES

SHEET 2

SCALE:

OF

DESIGNER

Plot Date: Cad File No:29 March 2021 - 7:25 PM C:\Users\Alex\OneDrive - USQ\00_Civlink Consulting\07_Projects\20200612 - Wahroonga Station Bridge\10_TCPs\HAS-LAK-40010-P2.dwg

DRAWN BY:

DRW CHECK:

APPROVED:

IND REVIEW:

DRAWING No:

SHEET

REVISIONHEIGHT DATUM:COORDINATE SYSTEM:

CLIENT

HASLIN CONSTRUCTIONS - LAKEMBA STATION UPGRADE

RAILWAY PARADE SITE LONG TERM SIGNAGEFROM BELLEVUE AVENUE TO CROYDON STREET

LOCALITY PLAN

HAS-LAK-40010-P2

1 2

P2N/A

LP

LP

LP

STOPSTOPSTOP

SCALE:

OF

DESIGNER

Plot Date: Cad File No:29 March 2021 - 7:25 PM C:\Users\Alex\OneDrive - USQ\00_Civlink Consulting\07_Projects\20200612 - Wahroonga Station Bridge\10_TCPs\HAS-LAK-40010-P2.dwg

DRAWN BY:

DRW CHECK:

APPROVED:

IND REVIEW:

DRAWING No:

SHEET

REVISIONHEIGHT DATUM:COORDINATE SYSTEM:

CLIENT

HASLIN CONSTRUCTIONS - LAKEMBA STATION UPGRADE

RAILWAY PARADE SITE LONG TERM SIGNAGEFROM BELLEVUE AVENUE TO CROYDON STREET

SIGNAGE PLAN

HAS-LAK-40010-P2

2 2

P2N/A

LP

LP

LP

S

H

E

E

T

2

121 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

A

B

C

D

E

F

G

H

A

B

C

D

E

F

G

H

SCALE:

OF

APPD.DESCRIPTIONBYREV DATE

DESIGNER

Plot Date: Cad File No:21 March 2021 - 9:08 PM C:\Users\Alex\OneDrive - USQ\00_Civlink Consulting\07_Projects\20200612 - Wahroonga Station Bridge\10_TCPs\HAS-LAK-40025-P1.dwg

DRAWN BY:

DRW CHECK:

APPROVED:

IND REVIEW:

DRAWING No:

SHEET

REVISIONHEIGHT DATUM:COORDINATE SYSTEM:

CLIENT

HASLIN CONSTRUCTIONS - LAKEMBA STATION UPGRADE

RAILWAY PARADE - 3 WAY STOP/SLOW CONTROL(INCLUDING CROYDON STREET) TREE CLEARING

LOCALITY PLAN

HAS-LAK-40025-P1

1 2

P1N/A

LP

LP

LP

LP 21.03.21P1 ORIGINAL ISSUE LP

AutoCAD SHX Text
LOCATION CHECKLIST
AutoCAD SHX Text
ROAD: .......................................... LOCATION: .......................................................................... .......................................... LOCATION: .......................................................................... LOCATION: .......................................................................... .......................................................................... TYPE OF WORK: .............................................................................................................................................. .............................................................................................................................................. DATE: ......../......../20...... TIME: ........:.......... COMPLETED BY: .........................................../......../20...... TIME: ........:.......... COMPLETED BY: ...................................TIME: ........:.......... COMPLETED BY: ...........................................:.......... COMPLETED BY: ...................................COMPLETED BY: ......................................................................
AutoCAD SHX Text
1.
AutoCAD SHX Text
HAS PROVISION BEEN MADE FOR ANY INTERSECTIONS, ON-LOADING OR OFF-LOADING RAMPS WITHIN THE WORKSITE?
AutoCAD SHX Text
YES/NO/NA
AutoCAD SHX Text
2.
AutoCAD SHX Text
WILL VEHICLES BE ENTERING OR LEAVING THE WORKSITE FROM PRIVATE OR COMMERCIAL DRIVEWAYS? HAS PROVISION BEEN MADE FOR THOSE VEHICLES?
AutoCAD SHX Text
YES/NO/NA YES/NO/NA
AutoCAD SHX Text
3.
AutoCAD SHX Text
IS THERE ADEQUATE SIGHT DISTANCE FOR ROAD USERS TO SIGNS AND TRAFFIC CONTROLLERS?
AutoCAD SHX Text
YES/NO/NA
AutoCAD SHX Text
4.
AutoCAD SHX Text
WILL CONTROL MEASURES BE SAFE FOR THE APPROACH SPEEDS OF TRAFFIC?
AutoCAD SHX Text
YES/NO/NA
AutoCAD SHX Text
5.
AutoCAD SHX Text
HAS CONSIDERATION BEEN GIVEN TO TRAFFIC VOLUMES EXPECTED?
AutoCAD SHX Text
YES/NO/NA
AutoCAD SHX Text
6.
AutoCAD SHX Text
HAS PROVISION BEEN MADE FOR BUS STOPS (INCLUDING SCHOOL) ?
AutoCAD SHX Text
YES/NO/NA
AutoCAD SHX Text
7.
AutoCAD SHX Text
HAS PROVISION BEEN MADE FOR PEDESTRIANS INCLUDING THOSE WITH IMPAIRMENTS ?
AutoCAD SHX Text
YES/NO/NA
AutoCAD SHX Text
8.
AutoCAD SHX Text
HAS PROVISION BEEN MADE FOR CYCLISTS?
AutoCAD SHX Text
YES/NO/NA
AutoCAD SHX Text
9.
AutoCAD SHX Text
ARE THERE ANY OVERHEAD POWER LINES THAT MIGHT BE A RISK TO CONSTRUCTION VEHICLES AND PLANT?
AutoCAD SHX Text
YES/NO/NA
AutoCAD SHX Text
10.
AutoCAD SHX Text
HAS THE TIME OF DAY BEEN ADEQUATELY CONSIDERED (IE NIGHT WORK, LOW SETTING SUN) ?
AutoCAD SHX Text
YES/NO/NA
AutoCAD SHX Text
WHERE 'NO' HAS BEEN ANSWERED TO ITEMS 1 - 10 ABOVE, LIST ITEM # BELOW AND CORRECTIVE ACTION TAKEN IN ADDRESSING THE ISSUE.
AutoCAD SHX Text
ITEM #
AutoCAD SHX Text
ACTION TAKEN
AutoCAD SHX Text
APPROVED BY NAME: L. PEAU PWTMP CARD: 0051923852 SIGN: DATE:
AutoCAD SHX Text
1.26.2021
AutoCAD SHX Text
- THIS TCP HAS BEEN PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TCAWS MANUAL V6 2020. THIS TCP HAS BEEN PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TCAWS MANUAL V6 2020. - THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ENSURE ALL ROAD OCCUPANCY PERMITS AND SPEED ZONE THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ENSURE ALL ROAD OCCUPANCY PERMITS AND SPEED ZONE AUTHORISATION REQUIREMENTS ARE SATISFIED PRIOR IMPLEMENTATION OF THIS TCP. -- ANY EXISTING SIGNAGE THAT CONFLICTS WITH THIS TCP MUST BE COVERED AT ANY EXISTING SIGNAGE THAT CONFLICTS WITH THIS TCP MUST BE COVERED AT THE START OF OPERATION AND UNCOVERED AT THE COMPLETION. - THE SITE MUST COMPLY WITH THE TRAFFIC CONTROL AT WORK SITES MANUAL V6 2020 THE SITE MUST COMPLY WITH THE TRAFFIC CONTROL AT WORK SITES MANUAL V6 2020 EDITION AND A.S. 1742.3 - LOCATION CHECKLIST MUST BE COMPLETED FOR ALL WORKSITES LOCATION CHECKLIST MUST BE COMPLETED FOR ALL WORKSITES - SIGNS TO BE POSITIONED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TCAWS MANUAL V6 2020. SIGNS TO BE POSITIONED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TCAWS MANUAL V6 2020. - TRAFFIC CONTROLLERS TO BE POSITIONED WHERE THEY CAN MAINTAIN A CLEAR TRAFFIC CONTROLLERS TO BE POSITIONED WHERE THEY CAN MAINTAIN A CLEAR ESCAPE PATH. - 30km/h SPEED RESTRICTION USED WHERE 1.5m CLEARANCE CANNOT BE ACHIEVED. 30km/h SPEED RESTRICTION USED WHERE 1.5m CLEARANCE CANNOT BE ACHIEVED. - THIS TCP USE IS LIMITED TO THAT OF HASLIN CONSTRUCTIONS AND THEIR ASSOCIATED THIS TCP USE IS LIMITED TO THAT OF HASLIN CONSTRUCTIONS AND THEIR ASSOCIATED SUBCONTRACTORS, TRAFFIC CONTROL PROVIDERS AND FOR THE PROJECT REFERENCED.
AutoCAD SHX Text
GENERAL NOTES

PR

EP

AR

E

TO

ST

OP

RO

AD

WO

RK

40

EN

D

RO

AD

WO

RK

50

AH

EA

D

RO

AD

WO

RK

AH

EA

D

40

PR

EP

AR

E

TO

ST

OP

RO

AD

WO

RK

40

EN

D

RO

AD

WO

RK

50

AH

EA

D

RO

AD

WO

RK

AH

EA

D

40

PR

EP

AR

E

TO

ST

OP

RO

AD

WO

RK

40

EN

D

RO

AD

WO

RK

50

AH

EA

D

RO

AD

WO

RK

AH

EA

D

40

ROAD

WORK

40

AHEAD

ROAD

WORK

AHEAD

40

RO

AD

WO

RK

40

EN

D

RO

AD

WO

RK

50

AH

EA

D

ROAD

WO

RK

AH

EA

D

40

AH

EA

D

RO

AD

WO

RK

AH

EA

D

40

121 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

A

B

C

D

E

F

G

H

A

B

C

D

E

F

G

H

SCALE:

OF

APPD.DESCRIPTIONBYREV DATE

DESIGNER

Plot Date: Cad File No:21 March 2021 - 9:08 PM C:\Users\Alex\OneDrive - USQ\00_Civlink Consulting\07_Projects\20200612 - Wahroonga Station Bridge\10_TCPs\HAS-LAK-40025-P1.dwg

DRAWN BY:

DRW CHECK:

APPROVED:

IND REVIEW:

DRAWING No:

SHEET

REVISIONHEIGHT DATUM:COORDINATE SYSTEM:

CLIENT

HASLIN CONSTRUCTIONS - LAKEMBA STATION UPGRADE

RAILWAY PARADE - 3 WAY STOP/SLOW CONTROL(INCLUDING CROYDON STREET) TREE CLEARING

TRAFFIC GUIDANCE SCHEME

HAS-LAK-40025-P1

2 2

P1N/A

LP

LP

LP

LP 21.03.21P1 ORIGINAL ISSUE LP

AutoCAD SHX Text
THE BOULEVARDE
AutoCAD SHX Text
THE BOULEVARDE
AutoCAD SHX Text
THE BOULEVARDE
AutoCAD SHX Text
RAILWAY PARADE
AutoCAD SHX Text
RAILWAY PARADE
AutoCAD SHX Text
RAILWAY PARADE
AutoCAD SHX Text
HALDON ST
AutoCAD SHX Text
CROYDON ST
AutoCAD SHX Text
T5-5
AutoCAD SHX Text
T1-24 T1-18
AutoCAD SHX Text
T1-5 RM4-212n
AutoCAD SHX Text
TM2-17 RM4-1
AutoCAD SHX Text
T5-5
AutoCAD SHX Text
TM1 GM9-79
AutoCAD SHX Text
T1-24 T1-18
AutoCAD SHX Text
T1-5 RM4-212n
AutoCAD SHX Text
TM2-17 RM4-1
AutoCAD SHX Text
TM1 GM9-79
AutoCAD SHX Text
T1-24 T1-18
AutoCAD SHX Text
T1-5 RM4-212n
AutoCAD SHX Text
TM2-17 RM4-1
AutoCAD SHX Text
TM1 GM9-79
AutoCAD SHX Text
T1-5 RM4-212n
AutoCAD SHX Text
TM1 GM9-79
AutoCAD SHX Text
T1-5 RM4-212n
AutoCAD SHX Text
TM2-17 RM4-1
AutoCAD SHX Text
TM1 GM9-79
AutoCAD SHX Text
TM1 GM9-79
AutoCAD SHX Text
LEGEND
AutoCAD SHX Text
WORK AREA
AutoCAD SHX Text
PEDESTRIAN DETOUR ROUTE
AutoCAD SHX Text
CLOSED PEDESTRIAN PATH
AutoCAD SHX Text
PEDESTRIAN BARRICADE / PHYSICAL BARRIER
AutoCAD SHX Text
TRAFFIC CONTROLLER
AutoCAD SHX Text
TRAFFIC CONE / BOLLARD
AutoCAD SHX Text
TEMPORARY SIGN POSITION
AutoCAD SHX Text
SITE ACCESS / EGRESS
AutoCAD SHX Text
APPROVED BY NAME: L. PEAU PWTMP CARD: 0051923852 SIGN: DATE:
AutoCAD SHX Text
1.26.2021
AutoCAD SHX Text
- SIGN INSTALLATION MUST NOT OBSTRUCT EXISTING FOOTPATHS AND SIGHT DISTANCES SIGN INSTALLATION MUST NOT OBSTRUCT EXISTING FOOTPATHS AND SIGHT DISTANCES FOR VEHICLES TURNING OUT OF RESIDENTIAL DRIVEWAYS. - SIGNS SHOULD BE INSTALLED AT APPROXIMATELY 90 DEGREES TO APPROACHING SIGNS SHOULD BE INSTALLED AT APPROXIMATELY 90 DEGREES TO APPROACHING TRAFFIC - WHERE MULTI-MESSAGE SIGNS ARE USED NO PANELS CAN HAVE VOIDSWHERE MULTI-MESSAGE SIGNS ARE USED NO PANELS CAN HAVE VOIDS
AutoCAD SHX Text
SITE INSTALLATION NOTES

10-Jun-2021 Haslin Constructions Sairam Pilli 2, 2-4 Merton St SUTHERLAND NSW 2232 Dear Sir /Madam: ROAD LANE FOOTPATH CLOSURE PERMIT

Permit Number WP-RLF-1124/2021.

Permit For: One Road Lane & Footpath Closure For Standing Plan & Vehicle Operation Activity

Site Details: Railway Parade, Lakemba

Specific Location: Commuter Carpark (between Croydon St to Bellevue Ave)

DATE AND HOURS OF OPERATION:

Date From: 12/06/21 to 31/07/21 Between: 00:00 & 24:00

Your application for road and footpath closure permit at the above location has been approved and is subject to the following attached conditions. If you have further information or enquiries please contact Work Permit Officer on the above number or email [email protected] Yours faithfully

Dang Bui Work Permit Officer

CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1. If enquired, a Police Permit must be obtained from the Local Police Station. Please present this

letter to the Police when applying for a permit.

1. Carry out all work in accordance with Work Safe NSW Authority’s Requirements. 2. A thoroughfare for emergency vehicles must be provided at all times. 3. All affected residents, businesses, emergency authorities and service providers must be notified

of the work and road occupancy prior to commencement. Any concerns or requirements raised by business proprietors, residents or other occupants must be resolved or accommodated.

4. The applicant must have a Public Liability Insurance Cover of $20 million or over 5. All work is to be carried out and erect barricades and signage in accordance with Australian

Standards AS1742.3 – Traffic Control Devices for Works on Roads.

6. Reference is to be made to the RMS Publication “Traffic Control at Work Sites” for procedures on the provision of a Traffic Control Plan or Traffic Management Plan.

7. All affected business, residents and other occupants must be notified of the road occupancy and

activities prior to commencement. Any concerns or requirements raised by business proprietors, residents or other occupants must be resolved or accommodated

8. A minimum 3 metre The Traffic Control Plan and Traffic Management Details as specified in

your application must be implemented.

9. 3.0m minimum traffic lane widths must be maintained at all time

10. The alternative pedestrian access route must be safe, clear visible, appropriately delineated/ barricaded and signed at all times.

11. All Traffic Controllers must be RMS accredited

12. A copy of this Permit and approved Traffic Control Plan must be kept on the work site for

inspection by relevant Council Officer or the Police.

13. The applicant shall comply with any reasonable directive from Council’s Compliance Officers

14. The areas to be used for the activities must be maintained in a clean and tidy condition to the satisfaction of Council’s Compliance Officer