plainfield fy12 dewitt barlow unified plan 12-22-11

832019 Plainfield FY12 Dewitt Barlow Unified Plan 12-22-11

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullplainfield-fy12-dewitt-barlow-unified-plan-12-22-11 147

FY12 NCLB PLAINFIELD DISTRICT BARLOW (080)

1

2012 TITLE I UNIFIED PLAN TEMPLATE

District and School Information

District PLAINFIELD PUBLIC SCHOOLS

Chief School Administrator ANNA BELIN-PYLES Chief School Administrator E-mail abelinpplainfieldk12njus

NCLB Contact DAWN CICCONE NCLB Contact E-mail dcicconeplainfieldk12njus

School DeWitt D Barlow Elementary School

The school is designated (select one)

Targeted Assistance X Schoolwide

Principal Janet R Grooms Principal Principal E-mail jgroomsplainfieldk12njus

Principal Certification

The following certification must be made by the principal of the school Note Signatures must be kept on file at the school

I certify that I have been included in consultations related to the priority needs of my school and participated in the completion of this Title I Unified Plan I have been

an active member of the planning committee and provided input to the school needs assessment and the selection of priority problems I concur with the informationpresented herein including the identification of programs and activities that are funded by Title I Part A and if applicable SIA Part a

___ Janet R Grooms ______________________________ ___ Janet R Grooms_______________ __12-20-12

Principalrsquos Name Principalrsquos Signature Date




2

School NCLB Committee

Select committee members to develop the Unified PlanNote For continuity some representatives from this needs assessment stakeholder committee should be included in the schoolwide stakeholder group andor the SINIplan committee Identify the stakeholders who participated in the needs assessment andor development of the plan Signatures should be kept on file in the school

office for review Print off a copy of this page to obtain signatures Add lines as necessary

Name Stakeholder GroupParticipated in Needs

AssessmentParticipated in Plan

Development Signature Aurora J Hill School Staff - Administrator X

Kim Moore-Jones School Staff ndash Social Worker X

Fatima Embden School Staff ndash Reading Specialist X X

Margie Barrett School Staff ndash Math Specialist X X

Mary Holt School Staff ndash Special Education

X X

Jesus Peraza School Staff ndash Bilingual LEP X X

Lauren Leaston Parent ndash PTO President X X

Janet R Grooms School Staff ndash Current Administrator

X

Lois K School Staff ndash 5th Grade Teacher X

Debbie Marcelline-Jenkins School Staff ndash 4th GradeTeacher

X

Terica Troutman 21st Century Coordinator X




3

School NCLB Committee Meetings

List the dates of the meetings when the School NCLB Committee discussed the needs assessment and Unified Plan development Add rows as necessary

Date Location Topic Agenda on File Minutes on File

3rd Wednesday of every Month(2010-2011)

Barlow Elementary school X - Yes No X - Yes No

2011-2012 ndash ReorganizedNCLB Committee

Barlow School Library

November 15 2011 Barlow School Library School Action Plan X X

December 1 2011 Barlow School Library School Action Plan X X

January 19 2012 Barlow School Library School Action Plan TBD TBD

February 16 2012 Barlow School Library School Action Plan TBD TBD

March 15 2012 Barlow School Library School Action Plan TBD TBD

April 19 2012 Barlow School Library 2013 Title I Plan TBD TBD

May 17 2012 Barlow School Library 2013 Title I Plan TBD TBD

June 7 2012 Barlow School Library 2013 Title I Plan TBD TBD

Schoolrsquos Vision amp Mission

Provide update or develop the schoolrsquos vision and mission statement Refer to the Introduction for Unified Plan pages for guidance

What is the schoolrsquos vision statement

The staff parents and community of Barlow Elementary School are committed to achieving andmaintaining high academic standards We will maintain effective school leadership that fosters respecttrust and collaboration Collectively we will provide a safe and supportive learning environment thatfosters curiosity inquiry and a life- long passion for learning

What is the schoolrsquos mission Our mission aligns with the district mission The Plainfield Public Schools in partnership with its




4

community shall do whatever it takes for every student to achieve high academic standards No Alibis NoExceptions No Excuses DeWitt D Barlow School has created a school action plan that focuses on thefollowing

2011-2012 Theme ndash ldquoWorking Towards Standardsrdquo

I Student Achievement

Use of rigorous data driven instruction to identify targeted focus areas for instructionre-teaching conferencing data chats and assessment

Recreation of instructional focus calendars

Schedule of lesson plans submitted bi-weekly

Use of model template for standards based bulletin boards

Implementation of the 25 books campaign for a December Kick-off

Encouraging students and parents to read and visit the Plainfield Public Library to get alibrary card at the Rain Forest Childrenrsquos section

Authorrsquos visits and school wide promotion of literacy theme

School based focus learning

Establishment of model classrooms for teachers to visit and observe walks

II Continuous professional development

Sustained professional development on CLI Lucy Calkins and use of cross gradearticulation sessions with Professional Learning Community Protocols for sharing bestpractice and improving instruction

Use of norms as a governing body for all PLC meetings

Review RTI in PLC meetings

III To promote a positive school climate and responsible student behaviorcitizenship

Formation of school discipline committee




5

Creation of school wide student handbook and discipline plan of rules rewards andconsequences

Use of monthly character traits to begin in November 2011

LT Research on positive behavior programs ie) PBIS ndash Positive and

Behavioral Interventions and support at pbisorg

Describe the process for developing or revising theschoolrsquos vision and mission

2010-2011 - Met with staff to come up with agreed upon goals objectives A draft was crafted andsubmitted to staff for input

2011-2012 ndash Through professional learning community meetings we shared the best practice for studentachievement and school climate and addressed areas in need of improvement as they pertain to the TitleI Plan and creation of a school wide action plan The Action Plan is a living document that will continue tobe modified and revised as the school year progresses




6

2012 Comprehensive Needs Assessment amp Data Analysis Summary

Data Collection and Analysis

Table A Multiple Measures Analyzed by the School in the Needs Assessment Process for 2011 Programs Strategies and PracticesResults and outcomes must be measurable

Areas Multiple Measures Analyzed Overall Measurable Results and Outcomes

Academic Achievement ndash Reading NJASK DIA DRA ACUITY End of Unit Assessments Teacher Made Assessments

The majority of students are not meeting grade level standards

LAL

NJASK 2011

Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6

Part Prof 667 632 744 660

Prof 333 368 256 340 Adv Prof 0 0 0 0

Academic Achievement - Writing NJASK ACUITY PPS Writes ndash Benchmark Writing Quarterly Assessments DIA


LAL

NJASK 2011


Part Prof 667 632 744 660

Prof 333 368 256 340

Adv Prof 0 0 0 0

Academic Achievement - Mathematics NJASK End of Unit AssessmentsTeacher Made Assessments

Safe Harbor was achieved in Elementary Math Grades 3-5 The majority of students arenot meeting grade level standards

Math

NJASK 2011


Part Prof 556 289 575 491

Prof 389 632 375 472

Adv Prof 56 79 50 38




7


Parent Involvement Back ndashto-School Night ParentTeacher Conferences PTO Sign-InSheets Global Connect AwardHonor Roll Principal

Luncheon Parent Involvement DayCareer Day Field Trips ConcertsampTheater Events Science FairSpelling Bee Geography Bee andCultural Events

There was high parental involvement at concerts student performances and culturalevents There was low to intermediate participation at PTO Meetings

Professional Development Grade Level and Staff Meeting Agendas and Minutes LucyCaulkins Writing CLI CharlotteDanielsonrsquos Framework for Teaching

Professional development in the area of writing was aligned to instruction and corecontent standards Professional development in Math and Science was minimal Morevertical articulation between grades levels is needed as well as job embeddedprofessional development

Extended Learning Opportunities BEAR After School Program and21st Century Grant Tutoring

Students made little gains as evidence of academic growth on the NJASK

Homeless NA NA

Students with Disabilities NJASK DIA DRA End of Unit Assessments Teacher Made Assessments Resource RoomTeacher Data

See LAL amp Math for Total population

English Language Learners NJASK DIA DRA End of Unit Assessments Teacher Made

Assessments ACCESS TestingData


Economically Disadvantaged NJASK DIA DRA End of Unit Assessments Teacher Made Assessments


School Culture Attendance at School Events High level of participation at most events as evidence by sign in sheets

Leadership District focus walk Evidence of recommended areas of strengths and suggestions for improvement

Highly Qualified Staff Highly Qualified Binder and Forms All teachers are highly qualified




8


School-Based Youth Services NA NA

Evaluation of 2011 Teaching and Learning Strategies amp Programs

Table B Strategies to Increase Student Achievement That Were Implemented in 2011

THIS TABLE IS FOR 2010-2011 OUTCOMES

1

Strategy or Program

2

ContentGroupFocus

3

Effective

Yes-No

4

Documentation of Effectiveness

5

Measurable Outcomes

Read 180 LAL Yes Student Lexile Reports Current Administrator unable to retrieve prior data to ascertain Read 180effectiveness from prior school year

NJASK Coach Test prepProblem Solving notebooks(Grades 3-6)

Mathematics Yes Student data DIA Teacher made Assessments Unit Assessments and NJASK scores

Current Administrator unable to retrieve prior data to ascertain NJASK Prepeffectiveness from prior school year

Students with Disabilities

HomelessMigrant

ELL

Table C Description of Extended DayYear Programs Implemented in 2011 to Address Academic Deficiencies - Do not include SES programs


1

Strategy or Program

2

ContentGroupFocus

3

Effective

Yes-No

4


5

Measurable Outcomes

BEAR After School Program

(Grades 3 4 5 6 belowproficiency)

Math ndash All studentsgrades 3-6 inclusiveof SPED ELL ED

Yes Student data DIA Teacher made assessments Unit Assessments and NJASK scores

Current Administrator unable to retrieve prior data to ascertain Read 180effectiveness from prior school year

BEAR After School Program Language Arts ndash Allstudents grades 3-6inclusive of SPEDELL ED





9

Table D Professional Development That Was Implemented in 2011

1

Strategy or Program

2

ContentGroupFocus

3

Effective

Yes-No

4


5

Measurable Outcomes

Through this series of workshops and modelingsessions teachers were trainedin areas such as creatingpractice NJASK writingprompts poetry promptsexpository prompts and ingetting our students to usecompositional risks to scorehigher on open-ended reading

and writing sections LucyCalkins and CLI Prof Dev

LAL Yes Lesson Plans aligned toNJASK test prep skillsStudent work withcommentary on the writingprocess My Learning PlanProfessional Development for meeting 100 PD hours

As a result of PD teachers gained significantstrategies and collaborated to share best practicesresulting in improvement on the quantity and thewriting process for student published pieces in theportfolio

Incorporation of Problem SolvingNotebooks (3-6)

Mathematics Yes Lesson Plans aligned totargeted skillsStudent work andassessments organized in thedata binder My Learning PlanProfessional Development for meeting 100 PD hours

As a result of PD teachers gained significantstrategies and collaborated to share best practicesresulting in improvement on the assessmentsorganized in the data binder for studentconferencing re-teaching and retesting In additionteachers utilized the Problem Solving Notebooks (3-6)as a tool for increasing student proficiency in this weakarea of math Thus resulting in safe harbor for grades 3-5

in Math for the 2011 NJASK Students withDisabilities

HomelessMigrant

ELL




10

Table E Parent Involvement That Was Implemented in 2011

1

Strategy or Program

2

ContentGroupFocus

3

Effective

Yes-No

4


This could be attendancesheets or any other

documentation you keep

5

Measurable Outcomes

Back to School Night All Content Areas Yes Attendance and Sign-In Sheet High level of parent and student involvement as evidenced by sign insheets for parent attendance

Parent ndash Teacher Conferences

All Content Areas Yes Attendance and Sign-In Sheet High level of parent and student involvement as evidenced by sign insheets for parent attendance

PTO All Content areas Yes Attendance and Sign-In Sheet Low to moderate level of parent attendance and involvement asevidenced by sign in sheets for parent attendanceHigh family involvement at events where students perform

Communications (GlobalConnect LettersProgress Reports)

All Content Areas Yes Attendance and Sign-In Sheet High level of parent and student involvement through electroniccommunications to parents in English and Spanish

Students with Disabilities Attendance and Sign-In Sheets

HomelessMigrant High Student Engagement

ELL Attendance and Sign-In Sheet

LAL Attendance and Sign-In Sheet

Mathematics


HomelessMigrant

ELL




11

2012 Needs Assessment amp Evaluation Summary

When responding to the questions below data from Tables A B C D and E should be used

1 Describe the process and techniques used in the needs assessment

Instructional priorities and program implementations are based on the need of our school The Genesis System enables the teachers to analyze their class data andassess performance of their students at various levels such as class student groups and individual student level This is also used as a tool to identify studentstrengths and weaknesses as related to the core content standards

2 Describe methods used to collect and compile data for student subgroups

Data is disaggregated by clusters class rosters and targeted skills for student subgroups The classroom after school and SES instruction becomes a data drivendecision making in order to differentiate instruction for student individual needs

3 Explain how the data from the collection methods are valid and reliable

The strengths and weaknesses are taken directly from data received from the state The information is reviewed and monitored frequently for accuracy andchanges

4 What did the data analysis reveal regarding classroom instruction

The data revealed that students had to catch up on many skills in third grade Once students became familiar with the skills they began to show improvement

5 What did the data analysis reveal regarding professional development implemented in the previous year(s)

The data revealed that students had made some gains particularly in the area of mathematics Teachers had received training in analyzing data examining studentwork and targeted instruction The data showed that we had made some gains in literacy but more work is needed in this area

6 How are educationally at-risk students identified in a timely manner

The above describe methods of data collection enables us to identify at-risk students In addition practice tests mimicking State tests in format and content are givenregularly These results are analyzed by teachers and administration This helps to further identify and address weakness at the student level

7 How are educationally at-risk students provided with effective assistance

At-risk students are identified at the beginning of the year They receive differentiated instruction in the classroom as well as small group pull-out These samestudents also receive interventions from our after school program or an SES program




12

8 How does the needs assessment address migrant student(s) needs

N A

9 How does the needs assessment address homeless student(s) needs

Students that are deemed homeless received transportation to and from school at the temporary residence while as needed Additionally students andfamilies received in-school counseling and community based social services to address needs

10 How were teachers engaged in decisions regarding the use of academic assessments to provide information on and improvement of the instructionalprogram

Teachers collaborated to develop classroom and benchmark assessments This took place during grade level and faculty meetings

11 Describe the transition plan for preschool to kindergarten if applicable

Barlow School is involved in a year-long planning process with Early Childhood to ensure that students transition to kindergarten smoothly and effectively Preschoolteachers of 4-year olds visit our kindergarten classrooms at the beginning of the school year to receive an overview of the program in order to ensure that their

students will be ready by the end of the year Preschool students visit our kindergarten classrooms and get a glimpse of what to expect in the upcoming school yearWhen time permits Teachers of Kindergarten and Preschool Principals Center Directors and Early Childhood Supervisor and Director visit the preschoolclassrooms together and share feedback relating to observations and reflections

12 Describe the process used to select the priority problems and root causes for this plan

We used information from benchmark and teacher made assessments We also used professional development surveys

13 What did the data analysis reveal regarding the root causes of subgroups not meeting AYP

Many of the students showed weaknesses in comprehension (analyzing and interpreting text) We attributed this to their lack of background knowledge and have

implemented a program to build vocabulary We also implemented strategies to teach students how to respond to open-ended questions In addition severalstudents showed weaknesses in writing We implemented strategies to address one of the root causes which was grammar and punctuation Many of the studentshad poor grammar mostly because they were trying to process two languages The root cause of many of the deficiencies in language arts were due to barriers inunderstanding the English language

14 Describe the evaluation results regarding the status of SMART goal 1 in the action plan

NOT APPLICABLE


NOT APPLICABLE




13


NOT APPLICABLE




14

2012 Needs Assessment ndash Partially Proficient

Provide the number of students at each grade level listed below who scored partially proficient on state assessments for two years or more in Language Arts Literacy andmathematics

Language Arts 2008-2009 2009-2010 Services Provided Describe why services provided did not result in proficiency

Grade 4 15 28 BEAR After School Safety Net Program Lack of end of program report to analyze data for programeffectiveness Need to develop more focused curriculum withtangible amp measureable data targets with technical assistance


Grade 6 NA 19 BEAR After School Safety Net Program Lack of end of program report to analyze data for program

effectiveness Need to develop more focused curriculum withtangible amp measureable data targets with technical assistance

Mathematics 2008-2009 2009-2010 Services Provided Describe why services provided did not result in proficiency


Grade 5 19 30 BEAR After School Safety Net Program Lack of end of program report to analyze data for program


Grade 6 NA 10 BEAR After School Safety Net Program Lack of end of program report to analyze data for programeffectiveness Need to develop more focused curriculum withtangible amp measureable data targets with technical assistance




15

Selection of Priority Problems

School Needs Assessment Summary Matrix Certification For Title I SINIs and SW schools Population Categories A-M have been annually assessed

Using information from the data analysis identify all priority problemsSelect three or four priority problems to address in this plan The selected problems should be checked in column T

When completing the matrix below data from Tables A B C D E and the Needs Assessment Summary should be used

P r i o r i t y P r o b l e m

Priority Problem

Population Categories

A

A l l s t u d e n t s

B

S t u d e n t s w i t h D i s a b i l i t i e s

C

E a r l y c h i l d h o o d

D

E c o n

d i s a d v a n t a g e d

E

N e g l e c t e d d e l i n q u e n t

F

Y o u t h a t r i s k

o f d r o p p i n g o u t

G

R a c i a l e t h n i c

H

H o m e l e s s

I I m m i g r a n t

J

L E P

K

T e a c h e r s

L

P a r a p r o f e s s i o n a l s

M

P a r e n t s

N

S u b s t a n c e a

b u s e r s

O

P e r p e t r a t o r s

o f V i o l e n c e

P

O u t - o f - s c h o o l

Q

M e n t a l h e a l t h

R

G i f t e d amp T a l e n t e d

S

O t h e r ( S p e c

i f y )_

____________

T

S e l e c t e d

P r i o r i t y P r o b l e m s

S t u d

e n t A c a d e m i c N e e d s

1 Closing the achievement gap X

2 Early childhood education

C o r e

C u r r i c u l u m C

o n t e n t

S t a n d a r d s

3a Language arts literacy and reading X X

3b Mathematics X X

3c Science X

3d Social studies X

3e World Languages3f Cross Content Workplace Readiness

4 Technology Literacy X

S t a f f N e e d s

H i g h Q u a l i t y P r o f e s s i o n a l

D e v e l o p m e n t

5

I m p l e m e n t i n g

t h e C C C S 5a Language Arts Literacy

5b Mathematics

5c Science X

5d Social studies X

5e World Languages

5f Cross Content Workplace Readiness

Effective classroom use of X X




16


Priority Problem


A


B

S t u d e n t s w i t h D i s a

b i l i t i e s

C


D

E c o n

d i s a d v a n t a g

e d

E


F

Y o u t h a t r i s k o f d r o

p p i n g o u t

G


H

H o m e l e s s

I I m m i g r a n t

J

L E P

K

T e a c h e r s

L


M

P a r e n t s

N

S u b s t a n c e a b u s e r

s

O

P e r p e t r a t o r s o f V i o l e n c e

P


Q


R


S

O t h e r ( S p e c i f y )_

__

__________

T

S e l e c t e d P r i o r i t y P r o b l e m s

6 technology

7 Standards-based assessment

8 Instructional skills and strategies

9 Mentoring

10 Classroom management

11 Using dataassess to improvelearning X

12 Working with parents

H i r i n g

R e c r u i t i n g a n d

R e t a i n i n g

13 Highly qualified teachers

14 Teachers in shortage areas

15 Teachers in Math and Science

16 Teachers to reduce class size

17 Qualified paraprofessionals

18 Highly qualified personnel

P r o b l e m s I d e n t i f i e d

19 Alcohol use

20 Drug use

21 Tobacco use22 Violence

23 Weapons

24 Gang activity

25 Delinquency

26 Vandalism

27Suspensions removals or expulsions

28Serious or persistent disciplineproblems

29 Bullying




17


Priority Problem


A


B


b i l i t i e s

C


D

E c o n


e d

E


F


p p i n g o u t

G


H

H o m e l e s s

I I m m i g r a n t

J

L E P

K

T e a c h e r s

L


M

P a r e n t s

N


s

O


P


Q


R


S


__

__________

T


30 Victimization

31 Truancyattendance

32 Mental health

33 Sexgender issues

34 Interpersonal conflict

35 Intergroup conflictbias

36 Negative peer influence

37 School safety

38 School climateenvironment

39 Risk factorsQualityTeacher 40 Teacher Quality

Tech amp EdMaterials

41 Technology activities X

42 InstructionalEducational MaterialsStudents with

SpecialNeeds 43 Drop-out rate

Literacy ampAdult Ed

44 Adult literacy

45 Parentcommunity involvement

Leadership46 Leadership Network

47 Leadership PD




18

Description of Priority Problems and Strategies to Address Them

All student subgroups not meeting AYP MUST be considered during the needs assessment process Select at least three priority problemsComplete the information below for each priority problem checked in column T on the previous pages Add additional sections as needed

1 2Population Category Letter ampProblem Number

A ndash 3a A ndash 3b

Name of priority problem Language Arts Literacy Reading Mathematics

Describe the priority problem Students are unable to explain ideas and concepts ReadingComprehensionProblem Solving

Describe the root causes of theproblem

Students have limited background knowledge and vocabularyStudents are unable to comprehend what is read As a result theydemonstrate an inability to analyze text and properly transfer knowledge to demonstrate proficiency

Students are unable to interpret word problems due to a lack of comprehension skills and vocabulary

Subgroup or population addressed ALL STUDENTS ALL STUDENTS

Grade spanK-6 K-6

Related content area missed Mathematics Language Arts Literacy

Name of scientifically researchbased programstrategypracticeto address problem

Childrenrsquos Literacy Initiative Building Academic Vocabulary Everyday Math Program ndash Differentiated small group instruction

How does the programstrategyalign with the NJ CCCS

Students are assessed on NJ literacy standards Students are assessed on NJ math standards

CAPA finding or recommendationrelated to the priority problem

NA NA




19

Description of Priority Problems and Strategies to Address Them (continued)

3 4

Population Category Letter amp

Problem Number

K 6

Name of priority problem Effective classroom use of technology

Describe the priority problem Underuse of technology in the classroom


Many teachers have technology in the classroom but do not embed itin their teaching due to insufficient training

Subgroup or populationaddressed

Teachers

Grade span K-6

Related content area missed ALL

Name of scientifically research

based programstrategypracticeto address problem

New Jersey Educational Technology Plan

Professional development workshops to assist teachers in infusingtechnology into all curriculum areas


This strategy supports New Jerseyrsquos technology mission


NA




20

Action Planning

Check Before Proceeding The action planning section is required for all SINIs

The action plans are developed for the primary strategies and programs selected that address the priority problems At least ten steps must be identified

Action Plan for Strategy Related to Priority Problem 1

Name of Program Strategy or Practice toAddress Priority Problem Extended day program implemented to address deficiencies in Language Arts Literacy building background knowledge

and academic vocabulary for comprehension in LAL are critical components to building proficiency

SMART Goal

(Specific Measurable Achievable Relevant Timely)

By June 2012 40 of all students in grades 3-6 will attain proficiency in Language Arts as a result of participating in

extended day intervention programs and technology infusion that is in alignment with targeted skills Research Supporting Strategy(from IES Practice Guide or What Works Clearinghouse)

The research of Success in Sight on student achievement denotes that data-based decision making refers to anunderstanding of and engagement of activities that use data to support teaching and learning Effective schoolpractices include school improvement strategies shown to be related to improved student achievement and targetedinterventions differentiated instruction based on data safe and orderly school climate and a focus on improvingacademic achievement

Indicators of Success 1 NJASK test results District Interim Assessments2 Read 180 Reading Plus benchmark indicators Teacher made assessmentsauthentic assessments

Description of Action Plan Steps Persons Involved Resources

Needed Due Date - Timeline

1 Conducted Needs Assessment Research for effective selection of programs and benefit tostudents Leadership Team REL Unified Plan NJASKdata 13111 2 Selection of program and confirmation of professional development opportunities attached to the

programs Adoption of the Developmental Studies Program for Writing in Grades 3-6 tosupplement the Lucy Calkins

Leadership Team Vendors and onlineresources

2111

3 Completion of grant and submission to the state for review Principal andTitle I Office

Application and budget 2411

4 Once approved programs will be purchased in a timely manner ensuring effective and timelyimplementation of the ACELLUS programs

Principal Purchase orders March2011

5 Ongoing Grade Level articulation to share and support each other TeachersTeacher Leaders

Lesson plans Weekly




21

6 Distribute permission slips for extended day Principal None February 2011

7 Administer District Interim Assessment and analyze data PrincipalInstructional StaffStudents Testing

Coordinator

District Interim Assessment Oct Feb amp April

8 Extended Day program begins Baseline data collected for review and comparison academicgrowth

Instructional Staff SIA Funds March - Ongoing

9 Review benchmark assessments incorporated within the Extended Day program and chartbenchmark progress to share with instructional staff

PrincipalLeadership Team

Assessment results April-May

10 Student achievement data and anecdotal evidence collected from early implementation of theprogram will be analyzed to measure impact

Leadership Teamand Sub-Committees

Usage reports of theprograms and technologyand data from NJASK and

DIA results

Summer 2011


Name of Program Strategy or Practice toAddress Priority Problem Extended day program implemented to address deficiencies in Mathematics strategic ability to disectanalyze problems and

providing differentiated small group instruction in Mathematics are critical components to building proficiency

SMART Goal (Specific Measurable Achievable Relevant Timely)

By June 2012 55 of all students in grades 3-6 will attain proficiency in Mathematics as a result of participating in extended dayintervention programs small group instruction and technology infusion that is in alignment with targeted skills

Research Supporting Strategy(from IES Practice Guide or What Works Clearinghouse)

The research of Success in Sight on student achievement denotes that data-based decision making refers to anunderstanding of and engagement of activities that use data to support teaching and learning Effective school

practices include school improvement strategies shown to be related to improved student achievement and targetedinterventions differentiated instruction based on data safe and orderly school climate and a focus on improvingacademic achievement

Indicators of Success 1 NJASK test results District Interim Assessments (DIA) in Language Arts Literacy and Mathematics Quarterly WritingBenchmarks (District)

2 Reading Plus benchmark indicators ACELLUS benchmark indicators Teacher made assessments authentic assessments


Needed Due Date - Timeline 1 Conducted Needs Assessment Research for effective selection of programs and

benefit to students Leadership Team REL Unified Plan NJASK

data 13111




22

2 Selection of program and confirmation of professional development opportunitiesattached to the programs


2111



4 Once approved programs will be purchased in a timely manner ensuring effective andtimely implementation of all ACELLUS programs


5 Ongoing Grade Level articulation to share and support each other Teachers Teacher Leaders Lesson plans Weekly

6 Distribute permission slips for extended day Principal None February 2011 7 Administer District Interim Assessment and analyze data Principal Instructional

Staff StudentsTesting Coordinator


8 Extended Day program begins Baseline data collected for review and comparison Instructional Staff SIA Funds March ndash Ongoing

9 Review benchmark assessments incorporated within the Extended Day program andchart benchmark progress to share with instructional staff



10 Student achievement data and anecdotal evidence collected from early implementationof the program will be analyzed to measure impact

Leadership Team andSub-Committees

Usage reports of theprograms and technology

and data from NJASK andDIA results

Summer 2011


Name of Program Strategy or Practice toAddress Priority Problem

In alignment with the New Jersey Educational Technology Plan teachers will receive professional development tosupport their ability to infuse technology into all curriculum areas


By June 2012 40 of all students in grades 3-6 will attain proficiency in Language Arts and 55 will attain proficiency inMathematics as a result of technology infusion that is in alignment with targeted skills


Success in Sight is based on years of research by the Mid-continent Research for Education and Learning (McREL) andhas been presented in the ldquoWhat Worksrdquo books by Marzano -2003 Pickering Pollock-2001 Waters and McNulty-2005)It has been piloted across various grade level settings low and high performing schools including urban and ruralpopulations Pilot test data implementing the Success in Sight model shows 9 of the 11 low performing elementary andmiddle schools were making improvements during the first 2 years either by making AYP after failing to do so or bysignificantly increasing the percentage of students scoring at or above proficiency


2 Reading Plus benchmark indicators ACELLUS benchmark indicators Teacher made assessments authentic




23

assessments




data 13111



2111



4 Once approved programs will be purchased in a timely manner ensuring effective andtimely implementation of all programs


5 Professional development in use of Technology and Acellus up-grades are plannedand implemented

Company vendors PD facilitators March 2011 ndash As needed

6 Ongoing Grade Level articulation to share and support each other Teachers Teacher Leaders

Lesson plans

7 Implementation and dissemination of new technology and programs throughout thebuilding to ensure students and teachers are using the new materials ensure

alignment to NJCCCS and district curriculum

Teachers and PrincipalLeadership Team

Classroom environment Observation tool NJCCCS

curriculum maps

On-going

8 Acellus program begins Baseline data collected for review and comparison Instructional Staff SIA Funds March ndash Ongoing

9 Review Acellus reports and Intervention Plans usage reports to ensure all students arelogged into the programs and chart benchmark progress


On-line report access Ongoing




DIA results

Summer 2011




24

Plan Components for 2012

Table F Proposed 2012 Core Strategies to Address Student Achievement

Name of Strategy

Content Area

Focus TargetPopulation(s)

PersonResponsible

Indicators of Success(Measurable Evaluation Outcomes)

Research Supporting Strategy

(from IES Practice Guide or What WorksClearinghouse)

Building Vocabulary LAL K-6Daily ClassroomTeachers

Reaching our 2011 NJASK targets

Students in grades 3-6 will increase literacyand math NJASK scores by 20 points

Teachers will use benchmark assessments tomake decisions and drive instruction

Teachers will use Total ParticipationTechniques to engage all students in dailyinstruction as reflected in lesson

Building a large vocabulary is essentialwhen learning to read in a secondlanguage Simply put people with largevocabularies are more proficient readersthan those with limited vocabularies(Beglar amp Hunt 1995 Luppescu amp Day1993)

Comprehension Toolkit LALMATH K-6daily Classroomteachers


Teacher Made Common Assessments

Classroom Assessments

DRA levels


Each of the strategies in TheComprehension Toolkit is supported bymultiple research studies that were summarizedby Pearson Dole Duffy and Roehler (1992) as they determined Those strategies that active thoughtfulreaders use when constructing meaningfrom text They found that proficient readers

bull search for connections between whatthey know and the new information in thetext bull ask questions of themselves the authorand the text bull draw inferences during and after reading bull distinguish important and less importantideas in a text bull synthesize information within and acrosstexts




25

Name of Strategy

Content AreaFocus Target

Population(s)Person

Responsible Indicators of Success

(Measurable Evaluation Outcomes)

Research Supporting Strategy (from IES Practice Guide or What Works

Clearinghouse)

bull monitor understanding and repair faulty

comprehension Childrenrsquos LiteracyInitiative

LAL K-3Daily PrincipalCLITrainer

Sign-in sheets handouts and informalobservations


Independent research studies havedemonstrated that CLI interventions aresuccessful in improving childrenrsquos earlyliteracy skills Our programs are rootedin the most current research on bestpractices and our own experience inhundreds of classrooms in high-povertycommunities We help teachers not onlyincrease childrenrsquos scores onstandardized tests but also introduce

their students to the joy of reading andwriting

Responsive Classroom All K-6

Daily

ClassroomTeachers

Fewer Discipline referrals

Less Suspensions

Suspension report

Since the 1990s the ResponsiveClassroom approach has been the focusof considerable research interestFindings have associated the approachwith higher student test scores better social skills and fewer problembehaviors For teachers findings show anincreased sense of efficacy and more

high-quality instruction Lucy Calkinsrsquo Units of Study for Writing

LALWRITING K-5

Daily

ClassroomTeachers


District writing assessments


The TCRWPrsquos belief that there is not asingle string of sequenced lesson thatapplies to every possible classroom

The lessons must be responsive to theindividual needs of the writers in eachclassroom readingandwritingprojectcom




26

Name of Strategy


Population(s)Person




Clearinghouse)

Read 180 LAL 4 Teachers

Principal

Current Administrator unable to retrieve prior

data to ascertain Read 180 effectivenessfrom prior school year

Building a large vocabulary is essential

when learning to read in a secondlanguage Simply put people with largevocabularies are more proficient readersthan those with limited vocabularies(Beglar amp Hunt 1995 Luppescu amp Day1993)

NJASK Coach Testprep Problem Solvingnotebooks (Grades 3-6)

Mathematics 3-6 Teachers

Principal

DIA Teacher made Assessments Unit Assessments and NJASK scores

Tracking Analysis of the same student for

NJASK results to identify patterns and

trends

(Use of the JPM table from Peer Review

model)

Current Administrator unable to retrieveprior data to ascertain NJASK Prepeffectiveness from prior school year

Pilot test data implementing the Successin Sight model shows 9 of the 11 lowperforming elementary and middleschools were making improvementsduring the first 2 years either by making

AYP after failing to do so or bysignificantly increasing the percentage of students scoring at or above proficiency

Use an asterisk to denote new programs

Table G Proposed 2012 Extended Learning Opportunities to Address Academic Deficiencies Do not include SES

Name of Strategy

Content

AreaFocus

TargetPopulation(s)

Person Responsible

Indicators of Success



Clearinghouse)

BEAR After SchoolProgram

ALL 2nd -6th After School Coordinator Literacy amp math proficiency will increaseby 10

There is growing evidence that goodafterschool programming makes adifference in kidsrsquo lives according toHarvard Program in AfterschoolEducation and Research

Summer Enrichment LALMATH 2nd 6th Administration Literacy amp math proficiency will increaseby 10

A review of research demonstrates adominantly positive effect on students




27





28

Table H Proposed 2012 Professional Development to Address Student Achievement and Priority Problems

Name of Strategy

ContentArea

Focus Target

Population(s)Person Responsible Indicators of Success



Clearinghouse)

Childrenrsquos LiteracyInitiative(CLI)

Reading Workshop-Sept 2 Comprehensionstrategies- Sept 22

Writing Workshop-

Oct 5

Literacy K-3 CLI

Administration

Measurable writing skill development andscoring based on the NJ holistic scoringrubric

Evaluations

Sign-in sheets

State Approved Program

CurriculumPlanningAlignment Aug17-31

All K-6 AdministrationLeadershipteam

Curriculum maps

Instructional plans

Instructional focus calendars

Journal of Curriculum Studies v14 n3p267-76 Jul-Sep 1982

Responsive ClassroomSept 2nd

All K-6 Administration Fewer Discipline referrals

Less Suspensions

Suspension report

Since the 1990s the ResponsiveClassroom approach has been thefocus of considerable research interest Findings have associated theapproach with higher student testscores better social skills and fewer problem behaviors For teachersfindings show an increased sense of efficacy and more high-qualityinstruction





29

Table I Proposed 2012 Parent Involvement Strategies to Address Student Achievement and Priority Problems

Name of Strategy

ContentArea

Focus Target

Population(s)Person


(Measurable EvaluationOutcomes)


Clearinghouse)

Back To School Night Parents meet teachers andstaff They also learn about our curriculum and programming PTO and Parentalcommunications global connectletters report cards progressreports etc

ALL K-6 Principal 95 of parents present at Back toSchool Night

Since the 1990s the ResponsiveClassroom approach has been the focusof considerable research interestFindings have associated the approachwith higher student test scores better social skills and fewer problem behaviorsFor teachers findings show an increasedsense of efficacy and more high-quality

instruction Parent Teacher Conferences Teachers and parents meet todiscuss childrsquos progress

ALL K-6 Teachers 95 of parents present at PTC Since the 1990s the ResponsiveClassroom approach has been the focusof considerable research interestFindings have associated the approachwith higher student test scores better social skills and fewer problem behaviorsFor teachers findings show an increasedsense of efficacy and more high-qualityinstruction

Workshops that assist parents

in helping their students inliteracy The workshops willalso cover reading aloud to your child The workshop will alsocover technology available for use at home

LAL K-6 Leadership Team

CLI

60 of our parents will attend at

least 1 literacy workshop



Math Workshops Workshops that assist parentsin helping their studentsimprove math skills The

MATH K-6 Leadership Team 60 of our parents will attend atleast 1 math workshop

Total Participation Techniques MakingEvery Student an Active Learner (Himmele amp Himmele) Aligning Curriculum Instruction and




30

Name of Strategy

ContentArea

Focus Target

Population(s)Person




Clearinghouse)

workshop will also cover

technology available for use athome

Assessment (Wiggins amp Grant)





31

2012 Parent Involvement (PI) Narrative

1 What is the connection between PI and the priority problems identified in the needs assessment

The more parents are involved and aware of our programs the better students will perform

2 Do you have a school-parent compact

Yes

3 Describe the process to ensure that parents receive and review the school-parent compact

They will be given out at back to school night We have about 90 participation Parents that do not attend will be called and the form will be sent home with thechild

4 How is student achievement data reported to the publicThe information is presented at a PTO meeting designated for reviewing school data and programs

5 What is the procedure for notifying parents if the district has not met their annual measurable objectives for Title III

Letters are sent out from the district office

6 Identify procedures for informing parents about the schoolrsquos improvement status

Letters are sent out to parents in August It is also discussed at the Back to School Night and first PTO meeting

7 Identify procedures for informing parents about the schoolrsquos disaggregated assessment results

The information is presented at a PTO meeting designated for reviewing school data and programs

8 How were parents involved in the development of the Unified Plan

Parents will be identified to review the plan Many of the topics were discussed during the previous year during our school leadership council meetings

9 Identify procedures for informing a parent about their childrsquos student assessment results




32

Reports are mailed to parents

10 How were the required PI funds used in 2011

The funds were used to enhance parental involvement activities by providing refreshments and materials

11 How will the required PI funds be used in 2012

The funds will be used to enhance parental involvement activities by providing refreshments and materials




33

Table J-1 2011-2012 Annual Student Targets (Use best available data from One-Year Charts) At least two measurements must be listed

GRADE SPAN amp SUBGROUP LANGUAGE ARTS MATHEMATICS

3-5 State Assessment Baseline 2012 Target State Assessment Baseline 2012 Target

GRADE SPAN ELEMENTARY MIDDLE OR HIGH SCHOOL

Total NJASK 298 368 NJASK 479 531

Students with Disabilities NJASK 0 0 NJASK 0 0

Limited English Proficient Students NJASK 171 254 NJASK 293 364

White NJASK 0 0 NJASK 0 0

African-American NJASK 245 321 NJASK 445 501

AsianPacific Islander NJASK 0 0 NJASK 0 0

American IndianNative American NJASK 0 0 NJASK 0 0

Hispanic NJASK 333 400 NJASK 495 545

Others NJASK 0 0 NJASK 0 0

Economically Disadvantaged NJASK 297 367 NJASK 484 536


Total


Limited English Proficient Students

White

African-American

AsianPacific Islander

American IndianNative American

Hispanic

Others




34



Economically Disadvantaged

Table J-2 2011-2012 Annual Student Targets ndash Other Assessment


3-6 Other Assessment Name Baseline 2012 Target Other Assessment Name Baseline 2012 Target


Total Grades 3-6 DIA ndash District Interim Assessment

75 and 1st DIAcomparisonfor growth

Minimum of 80of StudentsProficient by 3rd DIA

DIA ndash District Interim Assessment

75 and1st DIAcomparison for growth

Minimum of 80 of StudentsProficient by3rd DIA



White

African-American



Hispanic

Others



Total






35



White

African-American



Hispanic

Others





36

Highly Qualified Staff

Table K Strategies to Attract and Retain Highly Qualified Staff

Number amp Percent

Content ampFocus

Description of Process to Meet HighlyQualified

Description of Strategy to Retain HQ Staff

Teachers who meet thequalifications for HQTconsistent with Title II-A

18 100 Strategies we use to retain teachers are using job-embedded professional development We also offer tuition reimbursement and several opportunities for teachers to gain professional development hours duringand after school hours

Teachers who do not meet thequalifications for HQTconsistent with Title II-A

0 NA The strategies used to attract and retainhighly qualified teachers are participationin college base job fairs

Paraprofessionals who meet thequalifications required by NCLB(education ParaPro testportfolio assessment)

2 NA

Paraprofessionals who do notmeet the qualifications requiredby NCLB (education ParaProtest portfolio assessment)

0 NA

Description of Strategy To Attract HQ Staff Individuals Responsible

The strategies used to attract and retain highly qualified teachers are participation in college base job fairs Principal




37

Table L Support for Teachers

Use the Table below to describe the 2012 methods for supporting teachers needing assistance with instruction and other problems

Description of Support

ContentArea Focus

Target Group

PersonResponsible


(Evaluation) How are teachers identified

One on One Coaching LALMATH Strugglingteacher

Resource

Teachers

Evidence of improved studentperformance by analysis and reviewof data binder anecdotal andassessments

Classroom Observations

Formalinformal

Lucy Calkins Units of Study Literacy -Writing

K-6 Teachers TCRWP Increased improvement of writing inall genres Use of holistic rubricscores and analysis of data toindicate higher scores on writing

tasks

All Kindergarten ndash 6th Grade teacherswill receive support in year 2 of Unitsof Study Implementation

Read 180 Literacy Grades 3 ndash 6 DistrictPersonnel Aurora J Hill

Increase lexile scores in the databinders and student portfolios

Table M Support for Administrators

Use the Table below to describe how leaders in schools in need of improvement are provided with support and instructional leadership


Content

Area Focus Target Group

Person

Responsible


(Evaluation) How are administrators identified


K-6 Teachers TCRWP Increased improvement of writing inall genres Consistent use of rubricsfor scoring published pieces

Selected by central office to attendPD through instructional services

Read 180 Literacy Grades 3 ndash 6 Caryn Cooper Increase lexile scores in the databinders and student portfolios





38

Student Eligibility and Selection

Table N All Schools Identify the multiple measures used to determine student eligibility in a targeted assistance school and the measures to identify students whoneed additional support in schoolwide programs For targeted assistance schools use the last two columns to designate if the measures are used as criteria for programentrance or exit

Measure

Homeless Migrant Students withDisabilities

EconomicallyDisadvantaged

ELL Other SubGroups

Targeted Assistance Schools

Entrance Criteria () Exit Criteria ()

State Assessment NJASK NA NJASK NJASK NJASK NA NA

Other Assessments DIA NA DIA DRA DIA NA NA

English LanguageProficiency Assessment

ACCESS Teacher DevelopedTests

NA ACCESS Teacher DevelopedTests



NA NA

Classroom Grades ReportCard

NA Report Card Report Card ReportCard

NA NA

Teacher Recommendation Teacher Developed

NA Teacher Developed

Teacher Developed

Teacher Developed

NA NA

Other READ 180 NA READ 180 READ 180 READ 180 NA NA

Support Elements

Ongoing and Sustained Technical Assistance




39

1 What assistance did the NCLB committee determine it needs to implement the 2012 Unified Plan in the schoolrsquos efforts to increase academic achievement

From the district Budgetary support The NCLB Committee was not a functional unit in the 2010-2011 school year so no determinations were made in this areabased due to inoperative group status

From outside experts NA

From others NA

2 Describe the current technical assistance offered to staff at the school Include assistance by district level andor outside experts for example skilledconsultants institutions of higher education (IHE) etc

Skilled consultants in literacy-Childrenrsquos Literacy Initiative

3 How is it targeted to the priority problems identified in the needs assessment

It is directly correlated with the 3aA- Literacy The trainers provide teachers with support in best practices in literacy

4 Identify the person(s) responsible for ensuring this technical assistance is provided

Principal

Technical Assistance is support offered to the school in any form necessary It can include the development of policies procedures and evaluation instrumentsdata analysis coaching program planning budgeting and the provision of specialized information Assistance may be offered directly by district staff the NJDOE or an outside consultant




40

District Support (completed by LEA for SINIs only)

1 Explain why the previous school and district plans did not bring about increased student academic achievement

The district is showing small gains in student academic achievement as reflected in two additional elementary schools making AYP from the previous year We are nothowever making the state benchmark for AYP which is the districtrsquos long term goal for its schools This is due to a lack of full implementation of the Continuous

Improvement Model (CIM) at the school level There is also a lack of complete understanding by school administrators on how to use data to drive instruction andplanning for results Many administrators are new and therefore do not have a full understanding of the best practices in literacy instruction

2 Explain how the district is supporting the school in the following areas

Providing professional development thatfocuses primarily on improving instruction andusing data to inform instruction

The Office of Assessment Data Collection and School Improvement in collaboration with the Office of ProfessionalDevelopment will continue to provide training on the analysis of multiple measures of data for its instructionalimplications and Continuous Improvement Model (CIM) which is based upon an 8 step process that relies heavily onthe use of data to drive decisions relative to teaching and learning

The next phase of the training efforts for the Office of Assessment Data Collection and School Improvement is toincrease teachersrsquo and staff literacy in assessments more specifically expand knowledge of various ways to assessthe purpose of assessments and what should be assessed

The Office of Professional Development will begin training sessions in district for teachers and administrators of grades 3-12 in research-based best practices of Lucy Calkinsrsquo Writing Units of Study

Implementing strategies grounded inscientifically based research that will strengtheninstruction in core academic subjects

The district conducts focus walks to review programming instructional planning and classroom practices The districtalso does not support the purchase or use of programs not grounded in research

The strategies and practices promoted within the district are Continuous Improvement Model (CIM) Writing ndashUnits of Study (Lucy Calkins)

Best Practices of Instructional Leaders and Teachers Assessment for Learning ndash J Chappius

Expanding parental involvement activities thatsupport the schoolrsquos efforts to increase studentachievement

To address parent involvement we will implement the following programsactivities

Increase parent participation at both school and district level SLC (leadership program)

Bring Your Parent to School Day Career Days Parent training in both mathematics and literacy Continue with the support for Parent Empowering Parents (PEP)




41

District and school web sites to inform parents and the community at large Newslettersflyers frequently sent home to parents in English and Spanish School and district functions Parent Institute Parent to parent discussion groups

Reallocating the budget to fund activities thatsupport the schoolrsquos improvement plan and are

most likely to increase student achievement

The district will not reallocate funds within the NCLB budget The allocations will remain intact for each Title BusinessOperations will work collaboratively with the schools to use resources effectively and efficiently Federal State andLocal funds including the city tax levy for education and Federal Entitlement and Competitive Grants State and PrivateGrants will be allocated andor reallocated according to guidelines to fund the activities that support the schoolrsquosimprovement plan

Ensuring that curriculum is aligned to the CCCS Curriculum frameworks have been created that use the NJCCCS as the foundation to help teachers guide instructionwith a specific sequence for facilitating learning New curriculum guides for all subject areas and grades K-12 will beprovided to teachers indicating all grade level expectations




42

2010-2011 Resource Allocation

Resource Allocation ndash Provide the following information regarding the use of the 2010-2011 funds including but not limited to 2010 SIA Part (A)

Type of Funds

Brief Description of Strategy or

Practice Implemented withFunds

Amount

Allocated

SIA Amount

Carried Over

Reallocated Use

of SIA

Outcomes as a Result of

Implementing the Strategy or Practice Evidence

2010 Title I Part A BEAR After School Safety NetProgram

We are aSchoolwideschool withblendedfunds

NOT APPLICABLE

NOT APPLICABLE

To be determined once theSpring 2011 NJASK results arereceived and analyzed

NJASK -Spring 2011

2010 SIA Part A Supplies and materials for extendedday instruction

Laptops for implementation of ACELLUS and

increased utilization of literacyweb-based interventions alreadyin place

$22965 Projected salaries for extended dayinstruction

Laptops and ACELLUS software tobe purchased summer of 2011 for immediate implementation duringthe 2011-12 SY

NA

Spring 2011

Federal SES After School TutorialPrograms for free and reducedstudent below proficiency

NCLB andother federalsources

NOT APPLICABLE

NOT APPLICABLE


NJASKSpring 2011

Local NA City TaxLevy

NOT APPLICABLE

NOT APPLICABLE


NJASKSpring 2011

Other Projected salaries for extended day

instruction

$9000 Projected salaries for extended day

instruction

NJASK

Spring 2012




43

School Budget Pages

School level budget pages in Excel must be completed along with each schoolrsquos Unified Plan identifying the following How the Title I Part A school allocation is budgeted for targeted assistance schools or schools operating schoolwide programs that do not blend

their funds How the SIA Part a allocation is budgeted for all schools receiving this award

Budget Detail pages and a Budget Summary are available as an Excel program at the following location wwwnjgoveducationgrantsentitlementnclb

Complete the Excel budget pages for each school and upload the file to the NCLB Application on EWEG on the Title I Unified Plan upload screen Thesebudget pages are in addition to the Title I Unified Plan for each school required to complete a plan

Budget Detail pages must be uploaded The signature of the Business Administrator must be kept on file at the districtschool




44

Corrective Action Restructuring and School Improvement

Certification For schools in Year 4 hold 5 5 hold 6 6 hold 7 7 hold 8 8 hold 9 9 hold and 10 that have had a CAPA visit Thecorrective action plan corrective actions identified in the CAPA summary report continue to be incorporated into the Unified Plan

Corrective Action (CAPA Recommendations) Status Report This form is completed by all schools in Year 4 and above Schools in corrective action had to implement one or more of the following corrective actions (as identified bythe district) in addition to the SINI andor SW components Identify which corrective action(s) will be taken and describe the implementation and how the action(s) will beincorporated with the other elements of the Title I Plan Note CAPA report prioritized recommendations and action plans must be incorporated into the Unified Plan

Corrective Actions (Recommendations from CAPA Report)

1 Required implementation of a new research-based curriculum or instructional program2 Extension of the school year or school day3 Replacement of staff members not including the principal who were relevant to the schoolrsquos low performance 4 Significant decrease in management authority at the school level5 Replacement of the principal

6 Restructuring the internal organization of the school7 Appointment of an outside expert to advise the school8 Provide for all relevant staff appropriate scientifically research-based professional development that is likely to improve academic achievement of low-

performing students

Corrective actions implemented ________ Complete the table below regarding the corrective actions implemented

CorrectiveAction Description

Effective

Yes - No Evidence of Effectiveness Outcomes

1

2

3

4

NOT APPLICABLE




45

SINI Year 5H and Above Restructuring Implementation NA

Certification For schools in Year 5 hold 6 6 hold 7 7 hold 8 8 hold 9 9 hold and 10 that have completed a restructuring plan theapproved restructuring plan continues to be incorporated into the Unified Plan

Year Restructuring Plan Created _______

The district must develop a restructuring plan for schools in Year 5 The alternative governance actions must be initiated (see below)

Note Districts must also complete the required ldquoSchool Restructuring Planrdquo which includes more detail on the planning process and the restructuring detailswwwnjgovnjdedtitle1accountabilityrestructuredoc

The restructuring options are as follows

1 Implement any major restructuring of the schoolrsquos governance that is consistent with the principles of restructuring as set f orth in the No Child Left Behind Act 2 Re-open the school as a public charter school as defined by state statute and regulation (NJSA 18A36A-1 et seq and NJAC 6A)

3 Replace all or most of the school staff which may include the principal who are relevant to the schoolrsquos inability to make adequate progress (consistent withexisting contractual provisions and applicable statutory protections in Title 18A)

Identify the restructuring option(s) selected ____

For schools in Year 5 hold and above complete the table below Add additional rows as needed

Fundamental Governance ReformsImplemented as Listed in Approved

Restructuring Plan Status of Implementation

Effective

Yes - No Evidence of

Effectiveness

Outcomes

1

2

3

4

5

List revisions made to the original restructuring plan




46

Peer Review

Check Before Proceeding At minimum the peer review must be completed by staff members from a school that is not in federal improvement status Peer reviewers should have expertise in content areas and in school improvement Peer review must contain recommendations PLEASE COMPLETE

1 Describe process used for peer review of the plan (The NJDOE peer review suggested process is available at wwwnjgovnjdedtitle1programpeer_reviewpdf )

The Principal and teachers held a meeting to review discuss and add comments for revision and improvement to the plan

2 Provide the actual date and location the peer review(s) took place

Peer Review took place on November 21 2011 under the leadership of Tammy Bowling-Jenkins EdD Principal

Location - Sunnymead Elementary School - Hillsborough NJ 08844 908-431-6607

3 Provide the information below

Peer Reviewer Name Title Affiliation Area of Expertise Address

Tammy Bowling-JenkinsEdD

Principal Staff Member PrincipalLeadership Sunnymead Elementary SchoolHillsborough NJ 08844

Lynette Ray- ReadingSpecialist

Staff Member Language Arts Sunnymead Elementary SchoolHillsborough NJ 08844

Maureen Mullin 4th

GradeTeacher

Staff Member Mathematics Sunnymead Elementary SchoolHillsborough NJ 08844

Ann Cucchiara SpecialEducationTeacher

Staff Member Special Education Sunnymead Elementary SchoolHillsborough NJ 0884

4 Provide a summary of the recommendations made by the peer review school




47

The plan is very comprehensive The peer reviewers did not have a great deal of feedback because according to them it seems thatthe Principal and Leadership Team have covered everything and for a solid plan There are comments embedded within the planand the JPM data info as a reference for math and literacy individual student tracking in the NJASK

5 List the specific recommendations that were incorporated into the plan as a result of the peer review

Use of the JPM Common teacher Assessments and use of model c lassrooms for in-house professional development Use of PBIS ndash

Positive andBehavioral Interventions and support at pbisorg




2

School NCLB Committee

Select committee members to develop the Unified PlanNote For continuity some representatives from this needs assessment stakeholder committee should be included in the schoolwide stakeholder group andor the SINIplan committee Identify the stakeholders who participated in the needs assessment andor development of the plan Signatures should be kept on file in the school

office for review Print off a copy of this page to obtain signatures Add lines as necessary

Name Stakeholder GroupParticipated in Needs

AssessmentParticipated in Plan

Development Signature Aurora J Hill School Staff - Administrator X

Kim Moore-Jones School Staff ndash Social Worker X

Fatima Embden School Staff ndash Reading Specialist X X

Margie Barrett School Staff ndash Math Specialist X X

Mary Holt School Staff ndash Special Education

X X

Jesus Peraza School Staff ndash Bilingual LEP X X

Lauren Leaston Parent ndash PTO President X X

Janet R Grooms School Staff ndash Current Administrator

X

Lois K School Staff ndash 5th Grade Teacher X

Debbie Marcelline-Jenkins School Staff ndash 4th GradeTeacher

X

Terica Troutman 21st Century Coordinator X




3
























4






















5











6







LAL

NJASK 2011


Part Prof 667 632 744 660

Prof 333 368 256 340 Adv Prof 0 0 0 0



LAL

NJASK 2011


Part Prof 667 632 744 660

Prof 333 368 256 340

Adv Prof 0 0 0 0



Math

NJASK 2011


Part Prof 556 289 575 491

Prof 389 632 375 472

Adv Prof 56 79 50 38




7









Homeless NA NA














8






1

Strategy or Program

2

ContentGroupFocus

3

Effective

Yes-No

4


5

Measurable Outcomes






HomelessMigrant

ELL



1

Strategy or Program

2

ContentGroupFocus

3

Effective

Yes-No

4


5

Measurable Outcomes











9


1

Strategy or Program

2

ContentGroupFocus

3

Effective

Yes-No

4


5

Measurable Outcomes









HomelessMigrant

ELL




10


1

Strategy or Program

2

ContentGroupFocus

3

Effective

Yes-No

4




5

Measurable Outcomes











Mathematics


HomelessMigrant

ELL




11




















12


N A














NOT APPLICABLE


NOT APPLICABLE




13


NOT APPLICABLE




14
















15






Priority Problem


A


B


C


D

E c o n


E


F



G


H

H o m e l e s s

I I m m i g r a n t

J

L E P

K

T e a c h e r s

L


M

P a r e n t s

N

S u b s t a n c e a

b u s e r s

O


o f V i o l e n c e

P


Q


R


S

O t h e r ( S p e c

i f y )_

____________

T

S e l e c t e d


S t u d




C o r e


o n t e n t

S t a n d a r d s


3b Mathematics X X

3c Science X

3d Social studies X



S t a f f N e e d s



5



5b Mathematics

5c Science X

5d Social studies X

5e World Languages






16


Priority Problem


A


B


b i l i t i e s

C


D

E c o n


e d

E


F


p p i n g o u t

G


H

H o m e l e s s

I I m m i g r a n t

J

L E P

K

T e a c h e r s

L


M

P a r e n t s

N


s

O


P


Q


R


S


__

__________

T


6 technology



9 Mentoring




H i r i n g


R e t a i n i n g








19 Alcohol use

20 Drug use


23 Weapons

24 Gang activity

25 Delinquency

26 Vandalism



29 Bullying




17


Priority Problem


A


B


b i l i t i e s

C


D

E c o n


e d

E


F


p p i n g o u t

G


H

H o m e l e s s

I I m m i g r a n t

J

L E P

K

T e a c h e r s

L


M

P a r e n t s

N


s

O


P


Q


R


S


__

__________

T


30 Victimization


32 Mental health

33 Sexgender issues




37 School safety








44 Adult literacy



47 Leadership PD




18











Grade spanK-6 K-6







NA NA




19


3 4


Problem Number

K 6






Teachers

Grade span K-6









NA




20

Action Planning






SMART Goal











2111






Lesson plans Weekly




21



Coordinator










DIA results

Summer 2011














data 13111




22



2111

















Summer 2011













23

assessments




data 13111



2111








Lesson plans





curriculum maps

On-going








DIA results

Summer 2011




24



Name of Strategy

Content Area


PersonResponsible














DRA levels







25

Name of Strategy


Population(s)Person




Clearinghouse)









Daily

ClassroomTeachers


Less Suspensions

Suspension report



LALWRITING K-5

Daily

ClassroomTeachers









26

Name of Strategy


Population(s)Person




Clearinghouse)


Principal







Principal




trends


model)






Name of Strategy

Content

AreaFocus

TargetPopulation(s)

Person Responsible




Clearinghouse)









27





28


Name of Strategy

ContentArea

Focus Target




Clearinghouse)



Writing Workshop-

Oct 5

Literacy K-3 CLI

Administration


Evaluations

Sign-in sheets




Curriculum maps

Instructional plans





Less Suspensions

Suspension report






29


Name of Strategy

ContentArea

Focus Target

Population(s)Person




Clearinghouse)









CLI











30

Name of Strategy

ContentArea

Focus Target

Population(s)Person




Clearinghouse)








31





Yes
















32









33
















Total



White

African-American



Hispanic

Others




34
















White

African-American



Hispanic

Others



Total






35



White

African-American



Hispanic

Others





36



Number amp Percent

Content ampFocus








2 NA


0 NA






37




ContentArea Focus

Target Group

PersonResponsible




Resource

Teachers



Formalinformal



tasks







Content


Person

Responsible











38



Measure



ELL Other SubGroups










NA NA



NA NA



Teacher Developed

Teacher Developed

NA NA


Support Elements





39




From others NA






Principal





40





















41









42



Type of Funds



Amount

Allocated

SIA Amount

Carried Over

Reallocated Use

of SIA





NOT APPLICABLE

NOT APPLICABLE


NJASK -Spring 2011






NA

Spring 2011



NOT APPLICABLE

NOT APPLICABLE


NJASKSpring 2011


NOT APPLICABLE

NOT APPLICABLE


NJASKSpring 2011


instruction


instruction

NJASK

Spring 2012




43

School Budget Pages









44







performing students



Effective


1

2

3

4

NOT APPLICABLE




45













Effective


Effectiveness

Outcomes

1

2

3

4

5





46

Peer Review













Maureen Mullin 4th

GradeTeacher








47








3
























4






















5











6







LAL

NJASK 2011


Part Prof 667 632 744 660

Prof 333 368 256 340 Adv Prof 0 0 0 0



LAL

NJASK 2011


Part Prof 667 632 744 660

Prof 333 368 256 340

Adv Prof 0 0 0 0



Math

NJASK 2011


Part Prof 556 289 575 491

Prof 389 632 375 472

Adv Prof 56 79 50 38




7









Homeless NA NA














8






1

Strategy or Program

2

ContentGroupFocus

3

Effective

Yes-No

4


5

Measurable Outcomes






HomelessMigrant

ELL



1

Strategy or Program

2

ContentGroupFocus

3

Effective

Yes-No

4


5

Measurable Outcomes











9


1

Strategy or Program

2

ContentGroupFocus

3

Effective

Yes-No

4


5

Measurable Outcomes









HomelessMigrant

ELL




10


1

Strategy or Program

2

ContentGroupFocus

3

Effective

Yes-No

4




5

Measurable Outcomes











Mathematics


HomelessMigrant

ELL




11




















12


N A














NOT APPLICABLE


NOT APPLICABLE




13


NOT APPLICABLE




14
















15






Priority Problem


A


B


C


D

E c o n


E


F



G


H

H o m e l e s s

I I m m i g r a n t

J

L E P

K

T e a c h e r s

L


M

P a r e n t s

N

S u b s t a n c e a

b u s e r s

O


o f V i o l e n c e

P


Q


R


S

O t h e r ( S p e c

i f y )_

____________

T

S e l e c t e d


S t u d




C o r e


o n t e n t

S t a n d a r d s


3b Mathematics X X

3c Science X

3d Social studies X



S t a f f N e e d s



5



5b Mathematics

5c Science X

5d Social studies X

5e World Languages






16


Priority Problem


A


B


b i l i t i e s

C


D

E c o n


e d

E


F


p p i n g o u t

G


H

H o m e l e s s

I I m m i g r a n t

J

L E P

K

T e a c h e r s

L


M

P a r e n t s

N


s

O


P


Q


R


S


__

__________

T


6 technology



9 Mentoring




H i r i n g


R e t a i n i n g








19 Alcohol use

20 Drug use


23 Weapons

24 Gang activity

25 Delinquency

26 Vandalism



29 Bullying




17


Priority Problem


A


B


b i l i t i e s

C


D

E c o n


e d

E


F


p p i n g o u t

G


H

H o m e l e s s

I I m m i g r a n t

J

L E P

K

T e a c h e r s

L


M

P a r e n t s

N


s

O


P


Q


R


S


__

__________

T


30 Victimization


32 Mental health

33 Sexgender issues




37 School safety








44 Adult literacy



47 Leadership PD




18











Grade spanK-6 K-6







NA NA




19


3 4


Problem Number

K 6






Teachers

Grade span K-6









NA




20

Action Planning






SMART Goal











2111






Lesson plans Weekly




21



Coordinator










DIA results

Summer 2011














data 13111




22



2111

















Summer 2011













23

assessments




data 13111



2111








Lesson plans





curriculum maps

On-going








DIA results

Summer 2011




24



Name of Strategy

Content Area


PersonResponsible














DRA levels







25

Name of Strategy


Population(s)Person




Clearinghouse)









Daily

ClassroomTeachers


Less Suspensions

Suspension report



LALWRITING K-5

Daily

ClassroomTeachers









26

Name of Strategy


Population(s)Person




Clearinghouse)


Principal







Principal




trends


model)






Name of Strategy

Content

AreaFocus

TargetPopulation(s)

Person Responsible




Clearinghouse)









27





28


Name of Strategy

ContentArea

Focus Target




Clearinghouse)



Writing Workshop-

Oct 5

Literacy K-3 CLI

Administration


Evaluations

Sign-in sheets




Curriculum maps

Instructional plans





Less Suspensions

Suspension report






29


Name of Strategy

ContentArea

Focus Target

Population(s)Person




Clearinghouse)









CLI











30

Name of Strategy

ContentArea

Focus Target

Population(s)Person




Clearinghouse)








31





Yes
















32









33
















Total



White

African-American



Hispanic

Others




34
















White

African-American



Hispanic

Others



Total






35



White

African-American



Hispanic

Others





36



Number amp Percent

Content ampFocus








2 NA


0 NA






37




ContentArea Focus

Target Group

PersonResponsible




Resource

Teachers



Formalinformal



tasks







Content


Person

Responsible











38



Measure



ELL Other SubGroups










NA NA



NA NA



Teacher Developed

Teacher Developed

NA NA


Support Elements





39




From others NA






Principal





40





















41









42



Type of Funds



Amount

Allocated

SIA Amount

Carried Over

Reallocated Use

of SIA





NOT APPLICABLE

NOT APPLICABLE


NJASK -Spring 2011






NA

Spring 2011



NOT APPLICABLE

NOT APPLICABLE


NJASKSpring 2011


NOT APPLICABLE

NOT APPLICABLE


NJASKSpring 2011


instruction


instruction

NJASK

Spring 2012




43

School Budget Pages









44







performing students



Effective


1

2

3

4

NOT APPLICABLE




45













Effective


Effectiveness

Outcomes

1

2

3

4

5





46

Peer Review













Maureen Mullin 4th

GradeTeacher








47








4






















5











6







LAL

NJASK 2011


Part Prof 667 632 744 660

Prof 333 368 256 340 Adv Prof 0 0 0 0



LAL

NJASK 2011


Part Prof 667 632 744 660

Prof 333 368 256 340

Adv Prof 0 0 0 0



Math

NJASK 2011


Part Prof 556 289 575 491

Prof 389 632 375 472

Adv Prof 56 79 50 38




7









Homeless NA NA














8






1

Strategy or Program

2

ContentGroupFocus

3

Effective

Yes-No

4


5

Measurable Outcomes






HomelessMigrant

ELL



1

Strategy or Program

2

ContentGroupFocus

3

Effective

Yes-No

4


5

Measurable Outcomes











9


1

Strategy or Program

2

ContentGroupFocus

3

Effective

Yes-No

4


5

Measurable Outcomes









HomelessMigrant

ELL




10


1

Strategy or Program

2

ContentGroupFocus

3

Effective

Yes-No

4




5

Measurable Outcomes











Mathematics


HomelessMigrant

ELL




11




















12


N A














NOT APPLICABLE


NOT APPLICABLE




13


NOT APPLICABLE




14
















15






Priority Problem


A


B


C


D

E c o n


E


F



G


H

H o m e l e s s

I I m m i g r a n t

J

L E P

K

T e a c h e r s

L


M

P a r e n t s

N

S u b s t a n c e a

b u s e r s

O


o f V i o l e n c e

P


Q


R


S

O t h e r ( S p e c

i f y )_

____________

T

S e l e c t e d


S t u d




C o r e


o n t e n t

S t a n d a r d s


3b Mathematics X X

3c Science X

3d Social studies X



S t a f f N e e d s



5



5b Mathematics

5c Science X

5d Social studies X

5e World Languages






16


Priority Problem


A


B


b i l i t i e s

C


D

E c o n


e d

E


F


p p i n g o u t

G


H

H o m e l e s s

I I m m i g r a n t

J

L E P

K

T e a c h e r s

L


M

P a r e n t s

N


s

O


P


Q


R


S


__

__________

T


6 technology



9 Mentoring




H i r i n g


R e t a i n i n g








19 Alcohol use

20 Drug use


23 Weapons

24 Gang activity

25 Delinquency

26 Vandalism



29 Bullying




17


Priority Problem


A


B


b i l i t i e s

C


D

E c o n


e d

E


F


p p i n g o u t

G


H

H o m e l e s s

I I m m i g r a n t

J

L E P

K

T e a c h e r s

L


M

P a r e n t s

N


s

O


P


Q


R


S


__

__________

T


30 Victimization


32 Mental health

33 Sexgender issues




37 School safety








44 Adult literacy



47 Leadership PD




18











Grade spanK-6 K-6







NA NA




19


3 4


Problem Number

K 6






Teachers

Grade span K-6









NA




20

Action Planning






SMART Goal











2111






Lesson plans Weekly




21



Coordinator










DIA results

Summer 2011














data 13111




22



2111

















Summer 2011













23

assessments




data 13111



2111








Lesson plans





curriculum maps

On-going








DIA results

Summer 2011




24



Name of Strategy

Content Area


PersonResponsible














DRA levels







25

Name of Strategy


Population(s)Person




Clearinghouse)









Daily

ClassroomTeachers


Less Suspensions

Suspension report



LALWRITING K-5

Daily

ClassroomTeachers









26

Name of Strategy


Population(s)Person




Clearinghouse)


Principal







Principal




trends


model)






Name of Strategy

Content

AreaFocus

TargetPopulation(s)

Person Responsible




Clearinghouse)









27





28


Name of Strategy

ContentArea

Focus Target




Clearinghouse)



Writing Workshop-

Oct 5

Literacy K-3 CLI

Administration


Evaluations

Sign-in sheets




Curriculum maps

Instructional plans





Less Suspensions

Suspension report






29


Name of Strategy

ContentArea

Focus Target

Population(s)Person




Clearinghouse)









CLI











30

Name of Strategy

ContentArea

Focus Target

Population(s)Person




Clearinghouse)








31





Yes
















32









33
















Total



White

African-American



Hispanic

Others




34
















White

African-American



Hispanic

Others



Total






35



White

African-American



Hispanic

Others





36



Number amp Percent

Content ampFocus








2 NA


0 NA






37




ContentArea Focus

Target Group

PersonResponsible




Resource

Teachers



Formalinformal



tasks







Content


Person

Responsible











38



Measure



ELL Other SubGroups










NA NA



NA NA



Teacher Developed

Teacher Developed

NA NA


Support Elements





39




From others NA






Principal





40





















41









42



Type of Funds



Amount

Allocated

SIA Amount

Carried Over

Reallocated Use

of SIA





NOT APPLICABLE

NOT APPLICABLE


NJASK -Spring 2011






NA

Spring 2011



NOT APPLICABLE

NOT APPLICABLE


NJASKSpring 2011


NOT APPLICABLE

NOT APPLICABLE


NJASKSpring 2011


instruction


instruction

NJASK

Spring 2012




43

School Budget Pages









44







performing students



Effective


1

2

3

4

NOT APPLICABLE




45













Effective


Effectiveness

Outcomes

1

2

3

4

5





46

Peer Review













Maureen Mullin 4th

GradeTeacher








47








5











6







LAL

NJASK 2011


Part Prof 667 632 744 660

Prof 333 368 256 340 Adv Prof 0 0 0 0



LAL

NJASK 2011


Part Prof 667 632 744 660

Prof 333 368 256 340

Adv Prof 0 0 0 0



Math

NJASK 2011


Part Prof 556 289 575 491

Prof 389 632 375 472

Adv Prof 56 79 50 38




7









Homeless NA NA














8






1

Strategy or Program

2

ContentGroupFocus

3

Effective

Yes-No

4


5

Measurable Outcomes






HomelessMigrant

ELL



1

Strategy or Program

2

ContentGroupFocus

3

Effective

Yes-No

4


5

Measurable Outcomes











9


1

Strategy or Program

2

ContentGroupFocus

3

Effective

Yes-No

4


5

Measurable Outcomes









HomelessMigrant

ELL




10


1

Strategy or Program

2

ContentGroupFocus

3

Effective

Yes-No

4




5

Measurable Outcomes











Mathematics


HomelessMigrant

ELL




11




















12


N A














NOT APPLICABLE


NOT APPLICABLE




13


NOT APPLICABLE




14
















15






Priority Problem


A


B


C


D

E c o n


E


F



G


H

H o m e l e s s

I I m m i g r a n t

J

L E P

K

T e a c h e r s

L


M

P a r e n t s

N

S u b s t a n c e a

b u s e r s

O


o f V i o l e n c e

P


Q


R


S

O t h e r ( S p e c

i f y )_

____________

T

S e l e c t e d


S t u d




C o r e


o n t e n t

S t a n d a r d s


3b Mathematics X X

3c Science X

3d Social studies X



S t a f f N e e d s



5



5b Mathematics

5c Science X

5d Social studies X

5e World Languages






16


Priority Problem


A


B


b i l i t i e s

C


D

E c o n


e d

E


F


p p i n g o u t

G


H

H o m e l e s s

I I m m i g r a n t

J

L E P

K

T e a c h e r s

L


M

P a r e n t s

N


s

O


P


Q


R


S


__

__________

T


6 technology



9 Mentoring




H i r i n g


R e t a i n i n g








19 Alcohol use

20 Drug use


23 Weapons

24 Gang activity

25 Delinquency

26 Vandalism



29 Bullying




17


Priority Problem


A


B


b i l i t i e s

C


D

E c o n


e d

E


F


p p i n g o u t

G


H

H o m e l e s s

I I m m i g r a n t

J

L E P

K

T e a c h e r s

L


M

P a r e n t s

N


s

O


P


Q


R


S


__

__________

T


30 Victimization


32 Mental health

33 Sexgender issues




37 School safety








44 Adult literacy



47 Leadership PD




18











Grade spanK-6 K-6







NA NA




19


3 4


Problem Number

K 6






Teachers

Grade span K-6









NA




20

Action Planning






SMART Goal











2111






Lesson plans Weekly




21



Coordinator










DIA results

Summer 2011














data 13111




22



2111

















Summer 2011













23

assessments




data 13111



2111








Lesson plans





curriculum maps

On-going








DIA results

Summer 2011




24



Name of Strategy

Content Area


PersonResponsible














DRA levels







25

Name of Strategy


Population(s)Person




Clearinghouse)









Daily

ClassroomTeachers


Less Suspensions

Suspension report



LALWRITING K-5

Daily

ClassroomTeachers









26

Name of Strategy


Population(s)Person




Clearinghouse)


Principal







Principal




trends


model)






Name of Strategy

Content

AreaFocus

TargetPopulation(s)

Person Responsible




Clearinghouse)









27





28


Name of Strategy

ContentArea

Focus Target




Clearinghouse)



Writing Workshop-

Oct 5

Literacy K-3 CLI

Administration


Evaluations

Sign-in sheets




Curriculum maps

Instructional plans





Less Suspensions

Suspension report






29


Name of Strategy

ContentArea

Focus Target

Population(s)Person




Clearinghouse)









CLI











30

Name of Strategy

ContentArea

Focus Target

Population(s)Person




Clearinghouse)








31





Yes
















32









33
















Total



White

African-American



Hispanic

Others




34
















White

African-American



Hispanic

Others



Total






35



White

African-American



Hispanic

Others





36



Number amp Percent

Content ampFocus








2 NA


0 NA






37




ContentArea Focus

Target Group

PersonResponsible




Resource

Teachers



Formalinformal



tasks







Content


Person

Responsible











38



Measure



ELL Other SubGroups










NA NA



NA NA



Teacher Developed

Teacher Developed

NA NA


Support Elements





39




From others NA






Principal





40





















41









42



Type of Funds



Amount

Allocated

SIA Amount

Carried Over

Reallocated Use

of SIA





NOT APPLICABLE

NOT APPLICABLE


NJASK -Spring 2011






NA

Spring 2011



NOT APPLICABLE

NOT APPLICABLE


NJASKSpring 2011


NOT APPLICABLE

NOT APPLICABLE


NJASKSpring 2011


instruction


instruction

NJASK

Spring 2012




43

School Budget Pages









44







performing students



Effective


1

2

3

4

NOT APPLICABLE




45













Effective


Effectiveness

Outcomes

1

2

3

4

5





46

Peer Review













Maureen Mullin 4th

GradeTeacher








47








6







LAL

NJASK 2011


Part Prof 667 632 744 660

Prof 333 368 256 340 Adv Prof 0 0 0 0



LAL

NJASK 2011


Part Prof 667 632 744 660

Prof 333 368 256 340

Adv Prof 0 0 0 0



Math

NJASK 2011


Part Prof 556 289 575 491

Prof 389 632 375 472

Adv Prof 56 79 50 38




7









Homeless NA NA














8






1

Strategy or Program

2

ContentGroupFocus

3

Effective

Yes-No

4


5

Measurable Outcomes






HomelessMigrant

ELL



1

Strategy or Program

2

ContentGroupFocus

3

Effective

Yes-No

4


5

Measurable Outcomes











9


1

Strategy or Program

2

ContentGroupFocus

3

Effective

Yes-No

4


5

Measurable Outcomes









HomelessMigrant

ELL




10


1

Strategy or Program

2

ContentGroupFocus

3

Effective

Yes-No

4




5

Measurable Outcomes











Mathematics


HomelessMigrant

ELL




11




















12


N A














NOT APPLICABLE


NOT APPLICABLE




13


NOT APPLICABLE




14
















15






Priority Problem


A


B


C


D

E c o n


E


F



G


H

H o m e l e s s

I I m m i g r a n t

J

L E P

K

T e a c h e r s

L


M

P a r e n t s

N

S u b s t a n c e a

b u s e r s

O


o f V i o l e n c e

P


Q


R


S

O t h e r ( S p e c

i f y )_

____________

T

S e l e c t e d


S t u d




C o r e


o n t e n t

S t a n d a r d s


3b Mathematics X X

3c Science X

3d Social studies X



S t a f f N e e d s



5



5b Mathematics

5c Science X

5d Social studies X

5e World Languages






16


Priority Problem


A


B


b i l i t i e s

C


D

E c o n


e d

E


F


p p i n g o u t

G


H

H o m e l e s s

I I m m i g r a n t

J

L E P

K

T e a c h e r s

L


M

P a r e n t s

N


s

O


P


Q


R


S


__

__________

T


6 technology



9 Mentoring




H i r i n g


R e t a i n i n g








19 Alcohol use

20 Drug use


23 Weapons

24 Gang activity

25 Delinquency

26 Vandalism



29 Bullying




17


Priority Problem


A


B


b i l i t i e s

C


D

E c o n


e d

E


F


p p i n g o u t

G


H

H o m e l e s s

I I m m i g r a n t

J

L E P

K

T e a c h e r s

L


M

P a r e n t s

N


s

O


P


Q


R


S


__

__________

T


30 Victimization


32 Mental health

33 Sexgender issues




37 School safety








44 Adult literacy



47 Leadership PD




18











Grade spanK-6 K-6







NA NA




19


3 4


Problem Number

K 6






Teachers

Grade span K-6









NA




20

Action Planning






SMART Goal











2111






Lesson plans Weekly




21



Coordinator










DIA results

Summer 2011














data 13111




22



2111

















Summer 2011













23

assessments




data 13111



2111








Lesson plans





curriculum maps

On-going








DIA results

Summer 2011




24



Name of Strategy

Content Area


PersonResponsible














DRA levels







25

Name of Strategy


Population(s)Person




Clearinghouse)









Daily

ClassroomTeachers


Less Suspensions

Suspension report



LALWRITING K-5

Daily

ClassroomTeachers









26

Name of Strategy


Population(s)Person




Clearinghouse)


Principal







Principal




trends


model)






Name of Strategy

Content

AreaFocus

TargetPopulation(s)

Person Responsible




Clearinghouse)









27





28


Name of Strategy

ContentArea

Focus Target




Clearinghouse)



Writing Workshop-

Oct 5

Literacy K-3 CLI

Administration


Evaluations

Sign-in sheets




Curriculum maps

Instructional plans





Less Suspensions

Suspension report






29


Name of Strategy

ContentArea

Focus Target

Population(s)Person




Clearinghouse)









CLI











30

Name of Strategy

ContentArea

Focus Target

Population(s)Person




Clearinghouse)








31





Yes
















32









33
















Total



White

African-American



Hispanic

Others




34
















White

African-American



Hispanic

Others



Total






35



White

African-American



Hispanic

Others





36



Number amp Percent

Content ampFocus








2 NA


0 NA






37




ContentArea Focus

Target Group

PersonResponsible




Resource

Teachers



Formalinformal



tasks







Content


Person

Responsible











38



Measure



ELL Other SubGroups










NA NA



NA NA



Teacher Developed

Teacher Developed

NA NA


Support Elements





39




From others NA






Principal





40





















41









42



Type of Funds



Amount

Allocated

SIA Amount

Carried Over

Reallocated Use

of SIA





NOT APPLICABLE

NOT APPLICABLE


NJASK -Spring 2011






NA

Spring 2011



NOT APPLICABLE

NOT APPLICABLE


NJASKSpring 2011


NOT APPLICABLE

NOT APPLICABLE


NJASKSpring 2011


instruction


instruction

NJASK

Spring 2012




43

School Budget Pages









44







performing students



Effective


1

2

3

4

NOT APPLICABLE




45













Effective


Effectiveness

Outcomes

1

2

3

4

5





46

Peer Review













Maureen Mullin 4th

GradeTeacher








47








7









Homeless NA NA














8






1

Strategy or Program

2

ContentGroupFocus

3

Effective

Yes-No

4


5

Measurable Outcomes






HomelessMigrant

ELL



1

Strategy or Program

2

ContentGroupFocus

3

Effective

Yes-No

4


5

Measurable Outcomes











9


1

Strategy or Program

2

ContentGroupFocus

3

Effective

Yes-No

4


5

Measurable Outcomes









HomelessMigrant

ELL




10


1

Strategy or Program

2

ContentGroupFocus

3

Effective

Yes-No

4




5

Measurable Outcomes











Mathematics


HomelessMigrant

ELL




11




















12


N A














NOT APPLICABLE


NOT APPLICABLE




13


NOT APPLICABLE




14
















15






Priority Problem


A


B


C


D

E c o n


E


F



G


H

H o m e l e s s

I I m m i g r a n t

J

L E P

K

T e a c h e r s

L


M

P a r e n t s

N

S u b s t a n c e a

b u s e r s

O


o f V i o l e n c e

P


Q


R


S

O t h e r ( S p e c

i f y )_

____________

T

S e l e c t e d


S t u d




C o r e


o n t e n t

S t a n d a r d s


3b Mathematics X X

3c Science X

3d Social studies X



S t a f f N e e d s



5



5b Mathematics

5c Science X

5d Social studies X

5e World Languages






16


Priority Problem


A


B


b i l i t i e s

C


D

E c o n


e d

E


F


p p i n g o u t

G


H

H o m e l e s s

I I m m i g r a n t

J

L E P

K

T e a c h e r s

L


M

P a r e n t s

N


s

O


P


Q


R


S


__

__________

T


6 technology



9 Mentoring




H i r i n g


R e t a i n i n g








19 Alcohol use

20 Drug use


23 Weapons

24 Gang activity

25 Delinquency

26 Vandalism



29 Bullying




17


Priority Problem


A


B


b i l i t i e s

C


D

E c o n


e d

E


F


p p i n g o u t

G


H

H o m e l e s s

I I m m i g r a n t

J

L E P

K

T e a c h e r s

L


M

P a r e n t s

N


s

O


P


Q


R


S


__

__________

T


30 Victimization


32 Mental health

33 Sexgender issues




37 School safety








44 Adult literacy



47 Leadership PD




18











Grade spanK-6 K-6







NA NA




19


3 4


Problem Number

K 6






Teachers

Grade span K-6









NA




20

Action Planning






SMART Goal











2111






Lesson plans Weekly




21



Coordinator










DIA results

Summer 2011














data 13111




22



2111

















Summer 2011













23

assessments




data 13111



2111








Lesson plans





curriculum maps

On-going








DIA results

Summer 2011




24



Name of Strategy

Content Area


PersonResponsible














DRA levels







25

Name of Strategy


Population(s)Person




Clearinghouse)









Daily

ClassroomTeachers


Less Suspensions

Suspension report



LALWRITING K-5

Daily

ClassroomTeachers









26

Name of Strategy


Population(s)Person




Clearinghouse)


Principal







Principal




trends


model)






Name of Strategy

Content

AreaFocus

TargetPopulation(s)

Person Responsible




Clearinghouse)









27





28


Name of Strategy

ContentArea

Focus Target




Clearinghouse)



Writing Workshop-

Oct 5

Literacy K-3 CLI

Administration


Evaluations

Sign-in sheets




Curriculum maps

Instructional plans





Less Suspensions

Suspension report






29


Name of Strategy

ContentArea

Focus Target

Population(s)Person




Clearinghouse)









CLI











30

Name of Strategy

ContentArea

Focus Target

Population(s)Person




Clearinghouse)








31





Yes
















32









33
















Total



White

African-American



Hispanic

Others




34
















White

African-American



Hispanic

Others



Total






35



White

African-American



Hispanic

Others





36



Number amp Percent

Content ampFocus








2 NA


0 NA






37




ContentArea Focus

Target Group

PersonResponsible




Resource

Teachers



Formalinformal



tasks







Content


Person

Responsible











38



Measure



ELL Other SubGroups










NA NA



NA NA



Teacher Developed

Teacher Developed

NA NA


Support Elements





39




From others NA






Principal





40





















41









42



Type of Funds



Amount

Allocated

SIA Amount

Carried Over

Reallocated Use

of SIA





NOT APPLICABLE

NOT APPLICABLE


NJASK -Spring 2011






NA

Spring 2011



NOT APPLICABLE

NOT APPLICABLE


NJASKSpring 2011


NOT APPLICABLE

NOT APPLICABLE


NJASKSpring 2011


instruction


instruction

NJASK

Spring 2012




43

School Budget Pages









44







performing students



Effective


1

2

3

4

NOT APPLICABLE




45













Effective


Effectiveness

Outcomes

1

2

3

4

5





46

Peer Review













Maureen Mullin 4th

GradeTeacher








47








8






1

Strategy or Program

2

ContentGroupFocus

3

Effective

Yes-No

4


5

Measurable Outcomes






HomelessMigrant

ELL



1

Strategy or Program

2

ContentGroupFocus

3

Effective

Yes-No

4


5

Measurable Outcomes











9


1

Strategy or Program

2

ContentGroupFocus

3

Effective

Yes-No

4


5

Measurable Outcomes









HomelessMigrant

ELL




10


1

Strategy or Program

2

ContentGroupFocus

3

Effective

Yes-No

4




5

Measurable Outcomes











Mathematics


HomelessMigrant

ELL




11




















12


N A














NOT APPLICABLE


NOT APPLICABLE




13


NOT APPLICABLE




14
















15






Priority Problem


A


B


C


D

E c o n


E


F



G


H

H o m e l e s s

I I m m i g r a n t

J

L E P

K

T e a c h e r s

L


M

P a r e n t s

N

S u b s t a n c e a

b u s e r s

O


o f V i o l e n c e

P


Q


R


S

O t h e r ( S p e c

i f y )_

____________

T

S e l e c t e d


S t u d




C o r e


o n t e n t

S t a n d a r d s


3b Mathematics X X

3c Science X

3d Social studies X



S t a f f N e e d s



5



5b Mathematics

5c Science X

5d Social studies X

5e World Languages






16


Priority Problem


A


B


b i l i t i e s

C


D

E c o n


e d

E


F


p p i n g o u t

G


H

H o m e l e s s

I I m m i g r a n t

J

L E P

K

T e a c h e r s

L


M

P a r e n t s

N


s

O


P


Q


R


S


__

__________

T


6 technology



9 Mentoring




H i r i n g


R e t a i n i n g








19 Alcohol use

20 Drug use


23 Weapons

24 Gang activity

25 Delinquency

26 Vandalism



29 Bullying




17


Priority Problem


A


B


b i l i t i e s

C


D

E c o n


e d

E


F


p p i n g o u t

G


H

H o m e l e s s

I I m m i g r a n t

J

L E P

K

T e a c h e r s

L


M

P a r e n t s

N


s

O


P


Q


R


S


__

__________

T


30 Victimization


32 Mental health

33 Sexgender issues




37 School safety








44 Adult literacy



47 Leadership PD




18











Grade spanK-6 K-6







NA NA




19


3 4


Problem Number

K 6






Teachers

Grade span K-6









NA




20

Action Planning






SMART Goal











2111






Lesson plans Weekly




21



Coordinator










DIA results

Summer 2011














data 13111




22



2111

















Summer 2011













23

assessments




data 13111



2111








Lesson plans





curriculum maps

On-going








DIA results

Summer 2011




24



Name of Strategy

Content Area


PersonResponsible














DRA levels







25

Name of Strategy


Population(s)Person




Clearinghouse)









Daily

ClassroomTeachers


Less Suspensions

Suspension report



LALWRITING K-5

Daily

ClassroomTeachers









26

Name of Strategy


Population(s)Person




Clearinghouse)


Principal







Principal




trends


model)






Name of Strategy

Content

AreaFocus

TargetPopulation(s)

Person Responsible




Clearinghouse)









27





28


Name of Strategy

ContentArea

Focus Target




Clearinghouse)



Writing Workshop-

Oct 5

Literacy K-3 CLI

Administration


Evaluations

Sign-in sheets




Curriculum maps

Instructional plans





Less Suspensions

Suspension report






29


Name of Strategy

ContentArea

Focus Target

Population(s)Person




Clearinghouse)









CLI











30

Name of Strategy

ContentArea

Focus Target

Population(s)Person




Clearinghouse)








31





Yes
















32









33
















Total



White

African-American



Hispanic

Others




34
















White

African-American



Hispanic

Others



Total






35



White

African-American



Hispanic

Others





36



Number amp Percent

Content ampFocus








2 NA


0 NA






37




ContentArea Focus

Target Group

PersonResponsible




Resource

Teachers



Formalinformal



tasks







Content


Person

Responsible











38



Measure



ELL Other SubGroups










NA NA



NA NA



Teacher Developed

Teacher Developed

NA NA


Support Elements





39




From others NA






Principal





40





















41









42



Type of Funds



Amount

Allocated

SIA Amount

Carried Over

Reallocated Use

of SIA





NOT APPLICABLE

NOT APPLICABLE


NJASK -Spring 2011






NA

Spring 2011



NOT APPLICABLE

NOT APPLICABLE


NJASKSpring 2011


NOT APPLICABLE

NOT APPLICABLE


NJASKSpring 2011


instruction


instruction

NJASK

Spring 2012




43

School Budget Pages









44







performing students



Effective


1

2

3

4

NOT APPLICABLE




45













Effective


Effectiveness

Outcomes

1

2

3

4

5





46

Peer Review













Maureen Mullin 4th

GradeTeacher








47








9


1

Strategy or Program

2

ContentGroupFocus

3

Effective

Yes-No

4


5

Measurable Outcomes









HomelessMigrant

ELL




10


1

Strategy or Program

2

ContentGroupFocus

3

Effective

Yes-No

4




5

Measurable Outcomes











Mathematics


HomelessMigrant

ELL




11




















12


N A














NOT APPLICABLE


NOT APPLICABLE




13


NOT APPLICABLE




14
















15






Priority Problem


A


B


C


D

E c o n


E


F



G


H

H o m e l e s s

I I m m i g r a n t

J

L E P

K

T e a c h e r s

L


M

P a r e n t s

N

S u b s t a n c e a

b u s e r s

O


o f V i o l e n c e

P


Q


R


S

O t h e r ( S p e c

i f y )_

____________

T

S e l e c t e d


S t u d




C o r e


o n t e n t

S t a n d a r d s


3b Mathematics X X

3c Science X

3d Social studies X



S t a f f N e e d s



5



5b Mathematics

5c Science X

5d Social studies X

5e World Languages






16


Priority Problem


A


B


b i l i t i e s

C


D

E c o n


e d

E


F


p p i n g o u t

G


H

H o m e l e s s

I I m m i g r a n t

J

L E P

K

T e a c h e r s

L


M

P a r e n t s

N


s

O


P


Q


R


S


__

__________

T


6 technology



9 Mentoring




H i r i n g


R e t a i n i n g








19 Alcohol use

20 Drug use


23 Weapons

24 Gang activity

25 Delinquency

26 Vandalism



29 Bullying




17


Priority Problem


A


B


b i l i t i e s

C


D

E c o n


e d

E


F


p p i n g o u t

G


H

H o m e l e s s

I I m m i g r a n t

J

L E P

K

T e a c h e r s

L


M

P a r e n t s

N


s

O


P


Q


R


S


__

__________

T


30 Victimization


32 Mental health

33 Sexgender issues




37 School safety








44 Adult literacy



47 Leadership PD




18











Grade spanK-6 K-6







NA NA




19


3 4


Problem Number

K 6






Teachers

Grade span K-6









NA




20

Action Planning






SMART Goal











2111






Lesson plans Weekly




21



Coordinator










DIA results

Summer 2011














data 13111




22



2111

















Summer 2011













23

assessments




data 13111



2111








Lesson plans





curriculum maps

On-going








DIA results

Summer 2011




24



Name of Strategy

Content Area


PersonResponsible














DRA levels







25

Name of Strategy


Population(s)Person




Clearinghouse)









Daily

ClassroomTeachers


Less Suspensions

Suspension report



LALWRITING K-5

Daily

ClassroomTeachers









26

Name of Strategy


Population(s)Person




Clearinghouse)


Principal







Principal




trends


model)






Name of Strategy

Content

AreaFocus

TargetPopulation(s)

Person Responsible




Clearinghouse)









27





28


Name of Strategy

ContentArea

Focus Target




Clearinghouse)



Writing Workshop-

Oct 5

Literacy K-3 CLI

Administration


Evaluations

Sign-in sheets




Curriculum maps

Instructional plans





Less Suspensions

Suspension report






29


Name of Strategy

ContentArea

Focus Target

Population(s)Person




Clearinghouse)









CLI











30

Name of Strategy

ContentArea

Focus Target

Population(s)Person




Clearinghouse)








31





Yes
















32









33
















Total



White

African-American



Hispanic

Others




34
















White

African-American



Hispanic

Others



Total






35



White

African-American



Hispanic

Others





36



Number amp Percent

Content ampFocus








2 NA


0 NA






37




ContentArea Focus

Target Group

PersonResponsible




Resource

Teachers



Formalinformal



tasks







Content


Person

Responsible











38



Measure



ELL Other SubGroups










NA NA



NA NA



Teacher Developed

Teacher Developed

NA NA


Support Elements





39




From others NA






Principal





40





















41









42



Type of Funds



Amount

Allocated

SIA Amount

Carried Over

Reallocated Use

of SIA





NOT APPLICABLE

NOT APPLICABLE


NJASK -Spring 2011






NA

Spring 2011



NOT APPLICABLE

NOT APPLICABLE


NJASKSpring 2011


NOT APPLICABLE

NOT APPLICABLE


NJASKSpring 2011


instruction


instruction

NJASK

Spring 2012




43

School Budget Pages









44







performing students



Effective


1

2

3

4

NOT APPLICABLE




45













Effective


Effectiveness

Outcomes

1

2

3

4

5





46

Peer Review













Maureen Mullin 4th

GradeTeacher








47








10


1

Strategy or Program

2

ContentGroupFocus

3

Effective

Yes-No

4




5

Measurable Outcomes











Mathematics


HomelessMigrant

ELL




11




















12


N A














NOT APPLICABLE


NOT APPLICABLE




13


NOT APPLICABLE




14
















15






Priority Problem


A


B


C


D

E c o n


E


F



G


H

H o m e l e s s

I I m m i g r a n t

J

L E P

K

T e a c h e r s

L


M

P a r e n t s

N

S u b s t a n c e a

b u s e r s

O


o f V i o l e n c e

P


Q


R


S

O t h e r ( S p e c

i f y )_

____________

T

S e l e c t e d


S t u d




C o r e


o n t e n t

S t a n d a r d s


3b Mathematics X X

3c Science X

3d Social studies X



S t a f f N e e d s



5



5b Mathematics

5c Science X

5d Social studies X

5e World Languages






16


Priority Problem


A


B


b i l i t i e s

C


D

E c o n


e d

E


F


p p i n g o u t

G


H

H o m e l e s s

I I m m i g r a n t

J

L E P

K

T e a c h e r s

L


M

P a r e n t s

N


s

O


P


Q


R


S


__

__________

T


6 technology



9 Mentoring




H i r i n g


R e t a i n i n g








19 Alcohol use

20 Drug use


23 Weapons

24 Gang activity

25 Delinquency

26 Vandalism



29 Bullying




17


Priority Problem


A


B


b i l i t i e s

C


D

E c o n


e d

E


F


p p i n g o u t

G


H

H o m e l e s s

I I m m i g r a n t

J

L E P

K

T e a c h e r s

L


M

P a r e n t s

N


s

O


P


Q


R


S


__

__________

T


30 Victimization


32 Mental health

33 Sexgender issues




37 School safety








44 Adult literacy



47 Leadership PD




18











Grade spanK-6 K-6







NA NA




19


3 4


Problem Number

K 6






Teachers

Grade span K-6









NA




20

Action Planning






SMART Goal











2111






Lesson plans Weekly




21



Coordinator










DIA results

Summer 2011














data 13111




22



2111

















Summer 2011













23

assessments




data 13111



2111








Lesson plans





curriculum maps

On-going








DIA results

Summer 2011




24



Name of Strategy

Content Area


PersonResponsible














DRA levels







25

Name of Strategy


Population(s)Person




Clearinghouse)









Daily

ClassroomTeachers


Less Suspensions

Suspension report



LALWRITING K-5

Daily

ClassroomTeachers









26

Name of Strategy


Population(s)Person




Clearinghouse)


Principal







Principal




trends


model)






Name of Strategy

Content

AreaFocus

TargetPopulation(s)

Person Responsible




Clearinghouse)









27





28


Name of Strategy

ContentArea

Focus Target




Clearinghouse)



Writing Workshop-

Oct 5

Literacy K-3 CLI

Administration


Evaluations

Sign-in sheets




Curriculum maps

Instructional plans





Less Suspensions

Suspension report






29


Name of Strategy

ContentArea

Focus Target

Population(s)Person




Clearinghouse)









CLI











30

Name of Strategy

ContentArea

Focus Target

Population(s)Person




Clearinghouse)








31





Yes
















32









33
















Total



White

African-American



Hispanic

Others




34
















White

African-American



Hispanic

Others



Total






35



White

African-American



Hispanic

Others





36



Number amp Percent

Content ampFocus








2 NA


0 NA






37




ContentArea Focus

Target Group

PersonResponsible




Resource

Teachers



Formalinformal



tasks







Content


Person

Responsible











38



Measure



ELL Other SubGroups










NA NA



NA NA



Teacher Developed

Teacher Developed

NA NA


Support Elements





39




From others NA






Principal





40





















41









42



Type of Funds



Amount

Allocated

SIA Amount

Carried Over

Reallocated Use

of SIA





NOT APPLICABLE

NOT APPLICABLE


NJASK -Spring 2011






NA

Spring 2011



NOT APPLICABLE

NOT APPLICABLE


NJASKSpring 2011


NOT APPLICABLE

NOT APPLICABLE


NJASKSpring 2011


instruction


instruction

NJASK

Spring 2012




43

School Budget Pages









44







performing students



Effective


1

2

3

4

NOT APPLICABLE




45













Effective


Effectiveness

Outcomes

1

2

3

4

5





46

Peer Review













Maureen Mullin 4th

GradeTeacher








47








11




















12


N A














NOT APPLICABLE


NOT APPLICABLE




13


NOT APPLICABLE




14
















15






Priority Problem


A


B


C


D

E c o n


E


F



G


H

H o m e l e s s

I I m m i g r a n t

J

L E P

K

T e a c h e r s

L


M

P a r e n t s

N

S u b s t a n c e a

b u s e r s

O


o f V i o l e n c e

P


Q


R


S

O t h e r ( S p e c

i f y )_

____________

T

S e l e c t e d


S t u d




C o r e


o n t e n t

S t a n d a r d s


3b Mathematics X X

3c Science X

3d Social studies X



S t a f f N e e d s



5



5b Mathematics

5c Science X

5d Social studies X

5e World Languages






16


Priority Problem


A


B


b i l i t i e s

C


D

E c o n


e d

E


F


p p i n g o u t

G


H

H o m e l e s s

I I m m i g r a n t

J

L E P

K

T e a c h e r s

L


M

P a r e n t s

N


s

O


P


Q


R


S


__

__________

T


6 technology



9 Mentoring




H i r i n g


R e t a i n i n g








19 Alcohol use

20 Drug use


23 Weapons

24 Gang activity

25 Delinquency

26 Vandalism



29 Bullying




17


Priority Problem


A


B


b i l i t i e s

C


D

E c o n


e d

E


F


p p i n g o u t

G


H

H o m e l e s s

I I m m i g r a n t

J

L E P

K

T e a c h e r s

L


M

P a r e n t s

N


s

O


P


Q


R


S


__

__________

T


30 Victimization


32 Mental health

33 Sexgender issues




37 School safety








44 Adult literacy



47 Leadership PD




18











Grade spanK-6 K-6







NA NA




19


3 4


Problem Number

K 6






Teachers

Grade span K-6









NA




20

Action Planning






SMART Goal











2111






Lesson plans Weekly




21



Coordinator










DIA results

Summer 2011














data 13111




22



2111

















Summer 2011













23

assessments




data 13111



2111








Lesson plans





curriculum maps

On-going








DIA results

Summer 2011




24



Name of Strategy

Content Area


PersonResponsible














DRA levels







25

Name of Strategy


Population(s)Person




Clearinghouse)









Daily

ClassroomTeachers


Less Suspensions

Suspension report



LALWRITING K-5

Daily

ClassroomTeachers









26

Name of Strategy


Population(s)Person




Clearinghouse)


Principal







Principal




trends


model)






Name of Strategy

Content

AreaFocus

TargetPopulation(s)

Person Responsible




Clearinghouse)









27





28


Name of Strategy

ContentArea

Focus Target




Clearinghouse)



Writing Workshop-

Oct 5

Literacy K-3 CLI

Administration


Evaluations

Sign-in sheets




Curriculum maps

Instructional plans





Less Suspensions

Suspension report






29


Name of Strategy

ContentArea

Focus Target

Population(s)Person




Clearinghouse)









CLI











30

Name of Strategy

ContentArea

Focus Target

Population(s)Person




Clearinghouse)








31





Yes
















32









33
















Total



White

African-American



Hispanic

Others




34
















White

African-American



Hispanic

Others



Total






35



White

African-American



Hispanic

Others





36



Number amp Percent

Content ampFocus








2 NA


0 NA






37




ContentArea Focus

Target Group

PersonResponsible




Resource

Teachers



Formalinformal



tasks







Content


Person

Responsible











38



Measure



ELL Other SubGroups










NA NA



NA NA



Teacher Developed

Teacher Developed

NA NA


Support Elements





39




From others NA






Principal





40





















41









42



Type of Funds



Amount

Allocated

SIA Amount

Carried Over

Reallocated Use

of SIA





NOT APPLICABLE

NOT APPLICABLE


NJASK -Spring 2011






NA

Spring 2011



NOT APPLICABLE

NOT APPLICABLE


NJASKSpring 2011


NOT APPLICABLE

NOT APPLICABLE


NJASKSpring 2011


instruction


instruction

NJASK

Spring 2012




43

School Budget Pages









44







performing students



Effective


1

2

3

4

NOT APPLICABLE




45













Effective


Effectiveness

Outcomes

1

2

3

4

5





46

Peer Review













Maureen Mullin 4th

GradeTeacher








47








12


N A














NOT APPLICABLE


NOT APPLICABLE




13


NOT APPLICABLE




14
















15






Priority Problem


A


B


C


D

E c o n


E


F



G


H

H o m e l e s s

I I m m i g r a n t

J

L E P

K

T e a c h e r s

L


M

P a r e n t s

N

S u b s t a n c e a

b u s e r s

O


o f V i o l e n c e

P


Q


R


S

O t h e r ( S p e c

i f y )_

____________

T

S e l e c t e d


S t u d




C o r e


o n t e n t

S t a n d a r d s


3b Mathematics X X

3c Science X

3d Social studies X



S t a f f N e e d s



5



5b Mathematics

5c Science X

5d Social studies X

5e World Languages






16


Priority Problem


A


B


b i l i t i e s

C


D

E c o n


e d

E


F


p p i n g o u t

G


H

H o m e l e s s

I I m m i g r a n t

J

L E P

K

T e a c h e r s

L


M

P a r e n t s

N


s

O


P


Q


R


S


__

__________

T


6 technology



9 Mentoring




H i r i n g


R e t a i n i n g








19 Alcohol use

20 Drug use


23 Weapons

24 Gang activity

25 Delinquency

26 Vandalism



29 Bullying




17


Priority Problem


A


B


b i l i t i e s

C


D

E c o n


e d

E


F


p p i n g o u t

G


H

H o m e l e s s

I I m m i g r a n t

J

L E P

K

T e a c h e r s

L


M

P a r e n t s

N


s

O


P


Q


R


S


__

__________

T


30 Victimization


32 Mental health

33 Sexgender issues




37 School safety








44 Adult literacy



47 Leadership PD




18











Grade spanK-6 K-6







NA NA




19


3 4


Problem Number

K 6






Teachers

Grade span K-6









NA




20

Action Planning






SMART Goal











2111






Lesson plans Weekly




21



Coordinator










DIA results

Summer 2011














data 13111




22



2111

















Summer 2011













23

assessments




data 13111



2111








Lesson plans





curriculum maps

On-going








DIA results

Summer 2011




24



Name of Strategy

Content Area


PersonResponsible














DRA levels







25

Name of Strategy


Population(s)Person




Clearinghouse)









Daily

ClassroomTeachers


Less Suspensions

Suspension report



LALWRITING K-5

Daily

ClassroomTeachers









26

Name of Strategy


Population(s)Person




Clearinghouse)


Principal







Principal




trends


model)






Name of Strategy

Content

AreaFocus

TargetPopulation(s)

Person Responsible




Clearinghouse)









27





28


Name of Strategy

ContentArea

Focus Target




Clearinghouse)



Writing Workshop-

Oct 5

Literacy K-3 CLI

Administration


Evaluations

Sign-in sheets




Curriculum maps

Instructional plans





Less Suspensions

Suspension report






29


Name of Strategy

ContentArea

Focus Target

Population(s)Person




Clearinghouse)









CLI











30

Name of Strategy

ContentArea

Focus Target

Population(s)Person




Clearinghouse)








31





Yes
















32









33
















Total



White

African-American



Hispanic

Others




34
















White

African-American



Hispanic

Others



Total






35



White

African-American



Hispanic

Others





36



Number amp Percent

Content ampFocus








2 NA


0 NA






37




ContentArea Focus

Target Group

PersonResponsible




Resource

Teachers



Formalinformal



tasks







Content


Person

Responsible











38



Measure



ELL Other SubGroups










NA NA



NA NA



Teacher Developed

Teacher Developed

NA NA


Support Elements





39




From others NA






Principal





40





















41









42



Type of Funds



Amount

Allocated

SIA Amount

Carried Over

Reallocated Use

of SIA





NOT APPLICABLE

NOT APPLICABLE


NJASK -Spring 2011






NA

Spring 2011



NOT APPLICABLE

NOT APPLICABLE


NJASKSpring 2011


NOT APPLICABLE

NOT APPLICABLE


NJASKSpring 2011


instruction


instruction

NJASK

Spring 2012




43

School Budget Pages









44







performing students



Effective


1

2

3

4

NOT APPLICABLE




45













Effective


Effectiveness

Outcomes

1

2

3

4

5





46

Peer Review













Maureen Mullin 4th

GradeTeacher








47








13


NOT APPLICABLE




14
















15






Priority Problem


A


B


C


D

E c o n


E


F



G


H

H o m e l e s s

I I m m i g r a n t

J

L E P

K

T e a c h e r s

L


M

P a r e n t s

N

S u b s t a n c e a

b u s e r s

O


o f V i o l e n c e

P


Q


R


S

O t h e r ( S p e c

i f y )_

____________

T

S e l e c t e d


S t u d




C o r e


o n t e n t

S t a n d a r d s


3b Mathematics X X

3c Science X

3d Social studies X



S t a f f N e e d s



5



5b Mathematics

5c Science X

5d Social studies X

5e World Languages






16


Priority Problem


A


B


b i l i t i e s

C


D

E c o n


e d

E


F


p p i n g o u t

G


H

H o m e l e s s

I I m m i g r a n t

J

L E P

K

T e a c h e r s

L


M

P a r e n t s

N


s

O


P


Q


R


S


__

__________

T


6 technology



9 Mentoring




H i r i n g


R e t a i n i n g








19 Alcohol use

20 Drug use


23 Weapons

24 Gang activity

25 Delinquency

26 Vandalism



29 Bullying




17


Priority Problem


A


B


b i l i t i e s

C


D

E c o n


e d

E


F


p p i n g o u t

G


H

H o m e l e s s

I I m m i g r a n t

J

L E P

K

T e a c h e r s

L


M

P a r e n t s

N


s

O


P


Q


R


S


__

__________

T


30 Victimization


32 Mental health

33 Sexgender issues




37 School safety








44 Adult literacy



47 Leadership PD




18











Grade spanK-6 K-6







NA NA




19


3 4


Problem Number

K 6






Teachers

Grade span K-6









NA




20

Action Planning






SMART Goal











2111






Lesson plans Weekly




21



Coordinator










DIA results

Summer 2011














data 13111




22



2111

















Summer 2011













23

assessments




data 13111



2111








Lesson plans





curriculum maps

On-going








DIA results

Summer 2011




24



Name of Strategy

Content Area


PersonResponsible














DRA levels







25

Name of Strategy


Population(s)Person




Clearinghouse)









Daily

ClassroomTeachers


Less Suspensions

Suspension report



LALWRITING K-5

Daily

ClassroomTeachers









26

Name of Strategy


Population(s)Person




Clearinghouse)


Principal







Principal




trends


model)






Name of Strategy

Content

AreaFocus

TargetPopulation(s)

Person Responsible




Clearinghouse)









27





28


Name of Strategy

ContentArea

Focus Target




Clearinghouse)



Writing Workshop-

Oct 5

Literacy K-3 CLI

Administration


Evaluations

Sign-in sheets




Curriculum maps

Instructional plans





Less Suspensions

Suspension report






29


Name of Strategy

ContentArea

Focus Target

Population(s)Person




Clearinghouse)









CLI











30

Name of Strategy

ContentArea

Focus Target

Population(s)Person




Clearinghouse)








31





Yes
















32









33
















Total



White

African-American



Hispanic

Others




34
















White

African-American



Hispanic

Others



Total






35



White

African-American



Hispanic

Others





36



Number amp Percent

Content ampFocus








2 NA


0 NA






37




ContentArea Focus

Target Group

PersonResponsible




Resource

Teachers



Formalinformal



tasks







Content


Person

Responsible











38



Measure



ELL Other SubGroups










NA NA



NA NA



Teacher Developed

Teacher Developed

NA NA


Support Elements





39




From others NA






Principal





40





















41









42



Type of Funds



Amount

Allocated

SIA Amount

Carried Over

Reallocated Use

of SIA





NOT APPLICABLE

NOT APPLICABLE


NJASK -Spring 2011






NA

Spring 2011



NOT APPLICABLE

NOT APPLICABLE


NJASKSpring 2011


NOT APPLICABLE

NOT APPLICABLE


NJASKSpring 2011


instruction


instruction

NJASK

Spring 2012




43

School Budget Pages









44







performing students



Effective


1

2

3

4

NOT APPLICABLE




45













Effective


Effectiveness

Outcomes

1

2

3

4

5





46

Peer Review













Maureen Mullin 4th

GradeTeacher








47








14
















15






Priority Problem


A


B


C


D

E c o n


E


F



G


H

H o m e l e s s

I I m m i g r a n t

J

L E P

K

T e a c h e r s

L


M

P a r e n t s

N

S u b s t a n c e a

b u s e r s

O


o f V i o l e n c e

P


Q


R


S

O t h e r ( S p e c

i f y )_

____________

T

S e l e c t e d


S t u d




C o r e


o n t e n t

S t a n d a r d s


3b Mathematics X X

3c Science X

3d Social studies X



S t a f f N e e d s



5



5b Mathematics

5c Science X

5d Social studies X

5e World Languages






16


Priority Problem


A


B


b i l i t i e s

C


D

E c o n


e d

E


F


p p i n g o u t

G


H

H o m e l e s s

I I m m i g r a n t

J

L E P

K

T e a c h e r s

L


M

P a r e n t s

N


s

O


P


Q


R


S


__

__________

T


6 technology



9 Mentoring




H i r i n g


R e t a i n i n g








19 Alcohol use

20 Drug use


23 Weapons

24 Gang activity

25 Delinquency

26 Vandalism



29 Bullying




17


Priority Problem


A


B


b i l i t i e s

C


D

E c o n


e d

E


F


p p i n g o u t

G


H

H o m e l e s s

I I m m i g r a n t

J

L E P

K

T e a c h e r s

L


M

P a r e n t s

N


s

O


P


Q


R


S


__

__________

T


30 Victimization


32 Mental health

33 Sexgender issues




37 School safety








44 Adult literacy



47 Leadership PD




18











Grade spanK-6 K-6







NA NA




19


3 4


Problem Number

K 6






Teachers

Grade span K-6









NA




20

Action Planning






SMART Goal











2111






Lesson plans Weekly




21



Coordinator










DIA results

Summer 2011














data 13111




22



2111

















Summer 2011













23

assessments




data 13111



2111








Lesson plans





curriculum maps

On-going








DIA results

Summer 2011




24



Name of Strategy

Content Area


PersonResponsible














DRA levels







25

Name of Strategy


Population(s)Person




Clearinghouse)









Daily

ClassroomTeachers


Less Suspensions

Suspension report



LALWRITING K-5

Daily

ClassroomTeachers









26

Name of Strategy


Population(s)Person




Clearinghouse)


Principal







Principal




trends


model)






Name of Strategy

Content

AreaFocus

TargetPopulation(s)

Person Responsible




Clearinghouse)









27





28


Name of Strategy

ContentArea

Focus Target




Clearinghouse)



Writing Workshop-

Oct 5

Literacy K-3 CLI

Administration


Evaluations

Sign-in sheets




Curriculum maps

Instructional plans





Less Suspensions

Suspension report






29


Name of Strategy

ContentArea

Focus Target

Population(s)Person




Clearinghouse)









CLI











30

Name of Strategy

ContentArea

Focus Target

Population(s)Person




Clearinghouse)








31





Yes
















32









33
















Total



White

African-American



Hispanic

Others




34
















White

African-American



Hispanic

Others



Total






35



White

African-American



Hispanic

Others





36



Number amp Percent

Content ampFocus








2 NA


0 NA






37




ContentArea Focus

Target Group

PersonResponsible




Resource

Teachers



Formalinformal



tasks







Content


Person

Responsible











38



Measure



ELL Other SubGroups










NA NA



NA NA



Teacher Developed

Teacher Developed

NA NA


Support Elements





39




From others NA






Principal





40





















41









42



Type of Funds



Amount

Allocated

SIA Amount

Carried Over

Reallocated Use

of SIA





NOT APPLICABLE

NOT APPLICABLE


NJASK -Spring 2011






NA

Spring 2011



NOT APPLICABLE

NOT APPLICABLE


NJASKSpring 2011


NOT APPLICABLE

NOT APPLICABLE


NJASKSpring 2011


instruction


instruction

NJASK

Spring 2012




43

School Budget Pages









44







performing students



Effective


1

2

3

4

NOT APPLICABLE




45













Effective


Effectiveness

Outcomes

1

2

3

4

5





46

Peer Review













Maureen Mullin 4th

GradeTeacher








47








15






Priority Problem


A


B


C


D

E c o n


E


F



G


H

H o m e l e s s

I I m m i g r a n t

J

L E P

K

T e a c h e r s

L


M

P a r e n t s

N

S u b s t a n c e a

b u s e r s

O


o f V i o l e n c e

P


Q


R


S

O t h e r ( S p e c

i f y )_

____________

T

S e l e c t e d


S t u d




C o r e


o n t e n t

S t a n d a r d s


3b Mathematics X X

3c Science X

3d Social studies X



S t a f f N e e d s



5



5b Mathematics

5c Science X

5d Social studies X

5e World Languages






16


Priority Problem


A


B


b i l i t i e s

C


D

E c o n


e d

E


F


p p i n g o u t

G


H

H o m e l e s s

I I m m i g r a n t

J

L E P

K

T e a c h e r s

L


M

P a r e n t s

N


s

O


P


Q


R


S


__

__________

T


6 technology



9 Mentoring




H i r i n g


R e t a i n i n g








19 Alcohol use

20 Drug use


23 Weapons

24 Gang activity

25 Delinquency

26 Vandalism



29 Bullying




17


Priority Problem


A


B


b i l i t i e s

C


D

E c o n


e d

E


F


p p i n g o u t

G


H

H o m e l e s s

I I m m i g r a n t

J

L E P

K

T e a c h e r s

L


M

P a r e n t s

N


s

O


P


Q


R


S


__

__________

T


30 Victimization


32 Mental health

33 Sexgender issues




37 School safety








44 Adult literacy



47 Leadership PD




18











Grade spanK-6 K-6







NA NA




19


3 4


Problem Number

K 6






Teachers

Grade span K-6









NA




20

Action Planning






SMART Goal











2111






Lesson plans Weekly




21



Coordinator










DIA results

Summer 2011














data 13111




22



2111

















Summer 2011













23

assessments




data 13111



2111








Lesson plans





curriculum maps

On-going








DIA results

Summer 2011




24



Name of Strategy

Content Area


PersonResponsible














DRA levels







25

Name of Strategy


Population(s)Person




Clearinghouse)









Daily

ClassroomTeachers


Less Suspensions

Suspension report



LALWRITING K-5

Daily

ClassroomTeachers









26

Name of Strategy


Population(s)Person




Clearinghouse)


Principal







Principal




trends


model)






Name of Strategy

Content

AreaFocus

TargetPopulation(s)

Person Responsible




Clearinghouse)









27





28


Name of Strategy

ContentArea

Focus Target




Clearinghouse)



Writing Workshop-

Oct 5

Literacy K-3 CLI

Administration


Evaluations

Sign-in sheets




Curriculum maps

Instructional plans





Less Suspensions

Suspension report






29


Name of Strategy

ContentArea

Focus Target

Population(s)Person




Clearinghouse)









CLI











30

Name of Strategy

ContentArea

Focus Target

Population(s)Person




Clearinghouse)








31





Yes
















32









33
















Total



White

African-American



Hispanic

Others




34
















White

African-American



Hispanic

Others



Total






35



White

African-American



Hispanic

Others





36



Number amp Percent

Content ampFocus








2 NA


0 NA






37




ContentArea Focus

Target Group

PersonResponsible




Resource

Teachers



Formalinformal



tasks







Content


Person

Responsible











38



Measure



ELL Other SubGroups










NA NA



NA NA



Teacher Developed

Teacher Developed

NA NA


Support Elements





39




From others NA






Principal





40





















41









42



Type of Funds



Amount

Allocated

SIA Amount

Carried Over

Reallocated Use

of SIA





NOT APPLICABLE

NOT APPLICABLE


NJASK -Spring 2011






NA

Spring 2011



NOT APPLICABLE

NOT APPLICABLE


NJASKSpring 2011


NOT APPLICABLE

NOT APPLICABLE


NJASKSpring 2011


instruction


instruction

NJASK

Spring 2012




43

School Budget Pages









44







performing students



Effective


1

2

3

4

NOT APPLICABLE




45













Effective


Effectiveness

Outcomes

1

2

3

4

5





46

Peer Review













Maureen Mullin 4th

GradeTeacher








47








16


Priority Problem


A


B


b i l i t i e s

C


D

E c o n


e d

E


F


p p i n g o u t

G


H

H o m e l e s s

I I m m i g r a n t

J

L E P

K

T e a c h e r s

L


M

P a r e n t s

N


s

O


P


Q


R


S


__

__________

T


6 technology



9 Mentoring




H i r i n g


R e t a i n i n g








19 Alcohol use

20 Drug use


23 Weapons

24 Gang activity

25 Delinquency

26 Vandalism



29 Bullying




17


Priority Problem


A


B


b i l i t i e s

C


D

E c o n


e d

E


F


p p i n g o u t

G


H

H o m e l e s s

I I m m i g r a n t

J

L E P

K

T e a c h e r s

L


M

P a r e n t s

N


s

O


P


Q


R


S


__

__________

T


30 Victimization


32 Mental health

33 Sexgender issues




37 School safety








44 Adult literacy



47 Leadership PD




18











Grade spanK-6 K-6







NA NA




19


3 4


Problem Number

K 6






Teachers

Grade span K-6









NA




20

Action Planning






SMART Goal











2111






Lesson plans Weekly




21



Coordinator










DIA results

Summer 2011














data 13111




22



2111

















Summer 2011













23

assessments




data 13111



2111








Lesson plans





curriculum maps

On-going








DIA results

Summer 2011




24



Name of Strategy

Content Area


PersonResponsible














DRA levels







25

Name of Strategy


Population(s)Person




Clearinghouse)









Daily

ClassroomTeachers


Less Suspensions

Suspension report



LALWRITING K-5

Daily

ClassroomTeachers









26

Name of Strategy


Population(s)Person




Clearinghouse)


Principal







Principal




trends


model)






Name of Strategy

Content

AreaFocus

TargetPopulation(s)

Person Responsible




Clearinghouse)









27





28


Name of Strategy

ContentArea

Focus Target




Clearinghouse)



Writing Workshop-

Oct 5

Literacy K-3 CLI

Administration


Evaluations

Sign-in sheets




Curriculum maps

Instructional plans





Less Suspensions

Suspension report






29


Name of Strategy

ContentArea

Focus Target

Population(s)Person




Clearinghouse)









CLI











30

Name of Strategy

ContentArea

Focus Target

Population(s)Person




Clearinghouse)








31





Yes
















32









33
















Total



White

African-American



Hispanic

Others




34
















White

African-American



Hispanic

Others



Total






35



White

African-American



Hispanic

Others





36



Number amp Percent

Content ampFocus








2 NA


0 NA






37




ContentArea Focus

Target Group

PersonResponsible




Resource

Teachers



Formalinformal



tasks







Content


Person

Responsible











38



Measure



ELL Other SubGroups










NA NA



NA NA



Teacher Developed

Teacher Developed

NA NA


Support Elements





39




From others NA






Principal





40





















41









42



Type of Funds



Amount

Allocated

SIA Amount

Carried Over

Reallocated Use

of SIA





NOT APPLICABLE

NOT APPLICABLE


NJASK -Spring 2011






NA

Spring 2011



NOT APPLICABLE

NOT APPLICABLE


NJASKSpring 2011


NOT APPLICABLE

NOT APPLICABLE


NJASKSpring 2011


instruction


instruction

NJASK

Spring 2012




43

School Budget Pages









44







performing students



Effective


1

2

3

4

NOT APPLICABLE




45













Effective


Effectiveness

Outcomes

1

2

3

4

5





46

Peer Review













Maureen Mullin 4th

GradeTeacher








47








17


Priority Problem


A


B


b i l i t i e s

C


D

E c o n


e d

E


F


p p i n g o u t

G


H

H o m e l e s s

I I m m i g r a n t

J

L E P

K

T e a c h e r s

L


M

P a r e n t s

N


s

O


P


Q


R


S


__

__________

T


30 Victimization


32 Mental health

33 Sexgender issues




37 School safety








44 Adult literacy



47 Leadership PD




18











Grade spanK-6 K-6







NA NA




19


3 4


Problem Number

K 6






Teachers

Grade span K-6









NA




20

Action Planning






SMART Goal











2111






Lesson plans Weekly




21



Coordinator










DIA results

Summer 2011














data 13111




22



2111

















Summer 2011













23

assessments




data 13111



2111








Lesson plans





curriculum maps

On-going








DIA results

Summer 2011




24



Name of Strategy

Content Area


PersonResponsible














DRA levels







25

Name of Strategy


Population(s)Person




Clearinghouse)









Daily

ClassroomTeachers


Less Suspensions

Suspension report



LALWRITING K-5

Daily

ClassroomTeachers









26

Name of Strategy


Population(s)Person




Clearinghouse)


Principal







Principal




trends


model)






Name of Strategy

Content

AreaFocus

TargetPopulation(s)

Person Responsible




Clearinghouse)









27





28


Name of Strategy

ContentArea

Focus Target




Clearinghouse)



Writing Workshop-

Oct 5

Literacy K-3 CLI

Administration


Evaluations

Sign-in sheets




Curriculum maps

Instructional plans





Less Suspensions

Suspension report






29


Name of Strategy

ContentArea

Focus Target

Population(s)Person




Clearinghouse)









CLI











30

Name of Strategy

ContentArea

Focus Target

Population(s)Person




Clearinghouse)








31





Yes
















32









33
















Total



White

African-American



Hispanic

Others




34
















White

African-American



Hispanic

Others



Total






35



White

African-American



Hispanic

Others





36



Number amp Percent

Content ampFocus








2 NA


0 NA






37




ContentArea Focus

Target Group

PersonResponsible




Resource

Teachers



Formalinformal



tasks







Content


Person

Responsible











38



Measure



ELL Other SubGroups










NA NA



NA NA



Teacher Developed

Teacher Developed

NA NA


Support Elements





39




From others NA






Principal





40





















41









42



Type of Funds



Amount

Allocated

SIA Amount

Carried Over

Reallocated Use

of SIA





NOT APPLICABLE

NOT APPLICABLE


NJASK -Spring 2011






NA

Spring 2011



NOT APPLICABLE

NOT APPLICABLE


NJASKSpring 2011


NOT APPLICABLE

NOT APPLICABLE


NJASKSpring 2011


instruction


instruction

NJASK

Spring 2012




43

School Budget Pages









44







performing students



Effective


1

2

3

4

NOT APPLICABLE




45













Effective


Effectiveness

Outcomes

1

2

3

4

5





46

Peer Review













Maureen Mullin 4th

GradeTeacher








47








18











Grade spanK-6 K-6







NA NA




19


3 4


Problem Number

K 6






Teachers

Grade span K-6









NA




20

Action Planning






SMART Goal











2111






Lesson plans Weekly




21



Coordinator










DIA results

Summer 2011














data 13111




22



2111

















Summer 2011













23

assessments




data 13111



2111








Lesson plans





curriculum maps

On-going








DIA results

Summer 2011




24



Name of Strategy

Content Area


PersonResponsible














DRA levels







25

Name of Strategy


Population(s)Person




Clearinghouse)









Daily

ClassroomTeachers


Less Suspensions

Suspension report



LALWRITING K-5

Daily

ClassroomTeachers









26

Name of Strategy


Population(s)Person




Clearinghouse)


Principal







Principal




trends


model)






Name of Strategy

Content

AreaFocus

TargetPopulation(s)

Person Responsible




Clearinghouse)









27





28


Name of Strategy

ContentArea

Focus Target




Clearinghouse)



Writing Workshop-

Oct 5

Literacy K-3 CLI

Administration


Evaluations

Sign-in sheets




Curriculum maps

Instructional plans





Less Suspensions

Suspension report






29


Name of Strategy

ContentArea

Focus Target

Population(s)Person




Clearinghouse)









CLI











30

Name of Strategy

ContentArea

Focus Target

Population(s)Person




Clearinghouse)








31





Yes
















32









33
















Total



White

African-American



Hispanic

Others




34
















White

African-American



Hispanic

Others



Total






35



White

African-American



Hispanic

Others





36



Number amp Percent

Content ampFocus








2 NA


0 NA






37




ContentArea Focus

Target Group

PersonResponsible




Resource

Teachers



Formalinformal



tasks







Content


Person

Responsible











38



Measure



ELL Other SubGroups










NA NA



NA NA



Teacher Developed

Teacher Developed

NA NA


Support Elements





39




From others NA






Principal





40





















41









42



Type of Funds



Amount

Allocated

SIA Amount

Carried Over

Reallocated Use

of SIA





NOT APPLICABLE

NOT APPLICABLE


NJASK -Spring 2011






NA

Spring 2011



NOT APPLICABLE

NOT APPLICABLE


NJASKSpring 2011


NOT APPLICABLE

NOT APPLICABLE


NJASKSpring 2011


instruction


instruction

NJASK

Spring 2012




43

School Budget Pages









44







performing students



Effective


1

2

3

4

NOT APPLICABLE




45













Effective


Effectiveness

Outcomes

1

2

3

4

5





46

Peer Review













Maureen Mullin 4th

GradeTeacher








47








19


3 4


Problem Number

K 6






Teachers

Grade span K-6









NA




20

Action Planning






SMART Goal











2111






Lesson plans Weekly




21



Coordinator










DIA results

Summer 2011














data 13111




22



2111

















Summer 2011













23

assessments




data 13111



2111








Lesson plans





curriculum maps

On-going








DIA results

Summer 2011




24



Name of Strategy

Content Area


PersonResponsible














DRA levels







25

Name of Strategy


Population(s)Person




Clearinghouse)









Daily

ClassroomTeachers


Less Suspensions

Suspension report



LALWRITING K-5

Daily

ClassroomTeachers









26

Name of Strategy


Population(s)Person




Clearinghouse)


Principal







Principal




trends


model)






Name of Strategy

Content

AreaFocus

TargetPopulation(s)

Person Responsible




Clearinghouse)









27





28


Name of Strategy

ContentArea

Focus Target




Clearinghouse)



Writing Workshop-

Oct 5

Literacy K-3 CLI

Administration


Evaluations

Sign-in sheets




Curriculum maps

Instructional plans





Less Suspensions

Suspension report






29


Name of Strategy

ContentArea

Focus Target

Population(s)Person




Clearinghouse)









CLI











30

Name of Strategy

ContentArea

Focus Target

Population(s)Person




Clearinghouse)








31





Yes
















32









33
















Total



White

African-American



Hispanic

Others




34
















White

African-American



Hispanic

Others



Total






35



White

African-American



Hispanic

Others





36



Number amp Percent

Content ampFocus








2 NA


0 NA






37




ContentArea Focus

Target Group

PersonResponsible




Resource

Teachers



Formalinformal



tasks







Content


Person

Responsible











38



Measure



ELL Other SubGroups










NA NA



NA NA



Teacher Developed

Teacher Developed

NA NA


Support Elements





39




From others NA






Principal





40





















41









42



Type of Funds



Amount

Allocated

SIA Amount

Carried Over

Reallocated Use

of SIA





NOT APPLICABLE

NOT APPLICABLE


NJASK -Spring 2011






NA

Spring 2011



NOT APPLICABLE

NOT APPLICABLE


NJASKSpring 2011


NOT APPLICABLE

NOT APPLICABLE


NJASKSpring 2011


instruction


instruction

NJASK

Spring 2012




43

School Budget Pages









44







performing students



Effective


1

2

3

4

NOT APPLICABLE




45













Effective


Effectiveness

Outcomes

1

2

3

4

5





46

Peer Review













Maureen Mullin 4th

GradeTeacher








47








20

Action Planning






SMART Goal











2111






Lesson plans Weekly




21



Coordinator










DIA results

Summer 2011














data 13111




22



2111

















Summer 2011













23

assessments




data 13111



2111








Lesson plans





curriculum maps

On-going








DIA results

Summer 2011




24



Name of Strategy

Content Area


PersonResponsible














DRA levels







25

Name of Strategy


Population(s)Person




Clearinghouse)









Daily

ClassroomTeachers


Less Suspensions

Suspension report



LALWRITING K-5

Daily

ClassroomTeachers









26

Name of Strategy


Population(s)Person




Clearinghouse)


Principal







Principal




trends


model)






Name of Strategy

Content

AreaFocus

TargetPopulation(s)

Person Responsible




Clearinghouse)









27





28


Name of Strategy

ContentArea

Focus Target




Clearinghouse)



Writing Workshop-

Oct 5

Literacy K-3 CLI

Administration


Evaluations

Sign-in sheets




Curriculum maps

Instructional plans





Less Suspensions

Suspension report






29


Name of Strategy

ContentArea

Focus Target

Population(s)Person




Clearinghouse)









CLI











30

Name of Strategy

ContentArea

Focus Target

Population(s)Person




Clearinghouse)








31





Yes
















32









33
















Total



White

African-American



Hispanic

Others




34
















White

African-American



Hispanic

Others



Total






35



White

African-American



Hispanic

Others





36



Number amp Percent

Content ampFocus








2 NA


0 NA






37




ContentArea Focus

Target Group

PersonResponsible




Resource

Teachers



Formalinformal



tasks







Content


Person

Responsible











38



Measure



ELL Other SubGroups










NA NA



NA NA



Teacher Developed

Teacher Developed

NA NA


Support Elements





39




From others NA






Principal





40





















41









42



Type of Funds



Amount

Allocated

SIA Amount

Carried Over

Reallocated Use

of SIA





NOT APPLICABLE

NOT APPLICABLE


NJASK -Spring 2011






NA

Spring 2011



NOT APPLICABLE

NOT APPLICABLE


NJASKSpring 2011


NOT APPLICABLE

NOT APPLICABLE


NJASKSpring 2011


instruction


instruction

NJASK

Spring 2012




43

School Budget Pages









44







performing students



Effective


1

2

3

4

NOT APPLICABLE




45













Effective


Effectiveness

Outcomes

1

2

3

4

5





46

Peer Review













Maureen Mullin 4th

GradeTeacher








47








21



Coordinator










DIA results

Summer 2011














data 13111




22



2111

















Summer 2011













23

assessments




data 13111



2111








Lesson plans





curriculum maps

On-going








DIA results

Summer 2011




24



Name of Strategy

Content Area


PersonResponsible














DRA levels







25

Name of Strategy


Population(s)Person




Clearinghouse)









Daily

ClassroomTeachers


Less Suspensions

Suspension report



LALWRITING K-5

Daily

ClassroomTeachers









26

Name of Strategy


Population(s)Person




Clearinghouse)


Principal







Principal




trends


model)






Name of Strategy

Content

AreaFocus

TargetPopulation(s)

Person Responsible




Clearinghouse)









27





28


Name of Strategy

ContentArea

Focus Target




Clearinghouse)



Writing Workshop-

Oct 5

Literacy K-3 CLI

Administration


Evaluations

Sign-in sheets




Curriculum maps

Instructional plans





Less Suspensions

Suspension report






29


Name of Strategy

ContentArea

Focus Target

Population(s)Person




Clearinghouse)









CLI











30

Name of Strategy

ContentArea

Focus Target

Population(s)Person




Clearinghouse)








31





Yes
















32









33
















Total



White

African-American



Hispanic

Others




34
















White

African-American



Hispanic

Others



Total






35



White

African-American



Hispanic

Others





36



Number amp Percent

Content ampFocus








2 NA


0 NA






37




ContentArea Focus

Target Group

PersonResponsible




Resource

Teachers



Formalinformal



tasks







Content


Person

Responsible











38



Measure



ELL Other SubGroups










NA NA



NA NA



Teacher Developed

Teacher Developed

NA NA


Support Elements





39




From others NA






Principal





40





















41









42



Type of Funds



Amount

Allocated

SIA Amount

Carried Over

Reallocated Use

of SIA





NOT APPLICABLE

NOT APPLICABLE


NJASK -Spring 2011






NA

Spring 2011



NOT APPLICABLE

NOT APPLICABLE


NJASKSpring 2011


NOT APPLICABLE

NOT APPLICABLE


NJASKSpring 2011


instruction


instruction

NJASK

Spring 2012




43

School Budget Pages









44







performing students



Effective


1

2

3

4

NOT APPLICABLE




45













Effective


Effectiveness

Outcomes

1

2

3

4

5





46

Peer Review













Maureen Mullin 4th

GradeTeacher








47








22



2111

















Summer 2011













23

assessments




data 13111



2111








Lesson plans





curriculum maps

On-going








DIA results

Summer 2011




24



Name of Strategy

Content Area


PersonResponsible














DRA levels







25

Name of Strategy


Population(s)Person




Clearinghouse)









Daily

ClassroomTeachers


Less Suspensions

Suspension report



LALWRITING K-5

Daily

ClassroomTeachers









26

Name of Strategy


Population(s)Person




Clearinghouse)


Principal







Principal




trends


model)






Name of Strategy

Content

AreaFocus

TargetPopulation(s)

Person Responsible




Clearinghouse)









27





28


Name of Strategy

ContentArea

Focus Target




Clearinghouse)



Writing Workshop-

Oct 5

Literacy K-3 CLI

Administration


Evaluations

Sign-in sheets




Curriculum maps

Instructional plans





Less Suspensions

Suspension report






29


Name of Strategy

ContentArea

Focus Target

Population(s)Person




Clearinghouse)









CLI











30

Name of Strategy

ContentArea

Focus Target

Population(s)Person




Clearinghouse)








31





Yes
















32









33
















Total



White

African-American



Hispanic

Others




34
















White

African-American



Hispanic

Others



Total






35



White

African-American



Hispanic

Others





36



Number amp Percent

Content ampFocus








2 NA


0 NA






37




ContentArea Focus

Target Group

PersonResponsible




Resource

Teachers



Formalinformal



tasks







Content


Person

Responsible











38



Measure



ELL Other SubGroups










NA NA



NA NA



Teacher Developed

Teacher Developed

NA NA


Support Elements





39




From others NA






Principal





40





















41









42



Type of Funds



Amount

Allocated

SIA Amount

Carried Over

Reallocated Use

of SIA





NOT APPLICABLE

NOT APPLICABLE


NJASK -Spring 2011






NA

Spring 2011



NOT APPLICABLE

NOT APPLICABLE


NJASKSpring 2011


NOT APPLICABLE

NOT APPLICABLE


NJASKSpring 2011


instruction


instruction

NJASK

Spring 2012




43

School Budget Pages









44







performing students



Effective


1

2

3

4

NOT APPLICABLE




45













Effective


Effectiveness

Outcomes

1

2

3

4

5





46

Peer Review













Maureen Mullin 4th

GradeTeacher








47








23

assessments




data 13111



2111








Lesson plans





curriculum maps

On-going








DIA results

Summer 2011




24



Name of Strategy

Content Area


PersonResponsible














DRA levels







25

Name of Strategy


Population(s)Person




Clearinghouse)









Daily

ClassroomTeachers


Less Suspensions

Suspension report



LALWRITING K-5

Daily

ClassroomTeachers









26

Name of Strategy


Population(s)Person




Clearinghouse)


Principal







Principal




trends


model)






Name of Strategy

Content

AreaFocus

TargetPopulation(s)

Person Responsible




Clearinghouse)









27





28


Name of Strategy

ContentArea

Focus Target




Clearinghouse)



Writing Workshop-

Oct 5

Literacy K-3 CLI

Administration


Evaluations

Sign-in sheets




Curriculum maps

Instructional plans





Less Suspensions

Suspension report






29


Name of Strategy

ContentArea

Focus Target

Population(s)Person




Clearinghouse)









CLI











30

Name of Strategy

ContentArea

Focus Target

Population(s)Person




Clearinghouse)








31





Yes
















32









33
















Total



White

African-American



Hispanic

Others




34
















White

African-American



Hispanic

Others



Total






35



White

African-American



Hispanic

Others





36



Number amp Percent

Content ampFocus








2 NA


0 NA






37




ContentArea Focus

Target Group

PersonResponsible




Resource

Teachers



Formalinformal



tasks







Content


Person

Responsible











38



Measure



ELL Other SubGroups










NA NA



NA NA



Teacher Developed

Teacher Developed

NA NA


Support Elements





39




From others NA






Principal





40





















41









42



Type of Funds



Amount

Allocated

SIA Amount

Carried Over

Reallocated Use

of SIA





NOT APPLICABLE

NOT APPLICABLE


NJASK -Spring 2011






NA

Spring 2011



NOT APPLICABLE

NOT APPLICABLE


NJASKSpring 2011


NOT APPLICABLE

NOT APPLICABLE


NJASKSpring 2011


instruction


instruction

NJASK

Spring 2012




43

School Budget Pages









44







performing students



Effective


1

2

3

4

NOT APPLICABLE




45













Effective


Effectiveness

Outcomes

1

2

3

4

5





46

Peer Review













Maureen Mullin 4th

GradeTeacher








47








24



Name of Strategy

Content Area


PersonResponsible














DRA levels







25

Name of Strategy


Population(s)Person




Clearinghouse)









Daily

ClassroomTeachers


Less Suspensions

Suspension report



LALWRITING K-5

Daily

ClassroomTeachers









26

Name of Strategy


Population(s)Person




Clearinghouse)


Principal







Principal




trends


model)






Name of Strategy

Content

AreaFocus

TargetPopulation(s)

Person Responsible




Clearinghouse)









27





28


Name of Strategy

ContentArea

Focus Target




Clearinghouse)



Writing Workshop-

Oct 5

Literacy K-3 CLI

Administration


Evaluations

Sign-in sheets




Curriculum maps

Instructional plans





Less Suspensions

Suspension report






29


Name of Strategy

ContentArea

Focus Target

Population(s)Person




Clearinghouse)









CLI











30

Name of Strategy

ContentArea

Focus Target

Population(s)Person




Clearinghouse)








31





Yes
















32









33
















Total



White

African-American



Hispanic

Others




34
















White

African-American



Hispanic

Others



Total






35



White

African-American



Hispanic

Others





36



Number amp Percent

Content ampFocus








2 NA


0 NA






37




ContentArea Focus

Target Group

PersonResponsible




Resource

Teachers



Formalinformal



tasks







Content


Person

Responsible











38



Measure



ELL Other SubGroups










NA NA



NA NA



Teacher Developed

Teacher Developed

NA NA


Support Elements





39




From others NA






Principal





40





















41









42



Type of Funds



Amount

Allocated

SIA Amount

Carried Over

Reallocated Use

of SIA





NOT APPLICABLE

NOT APPLICABLE


NJASK -Spring 2011






NA

Spring 2011



NOT APPLICABLE

NOT APPLICABLE


NJASKSpring 2011


NOT APPLICABLE

NOT APPLICABLE


NJASKSpring 2011


instruction


instruction

NJASK

Spring 2012




43

School Budget Pages









44







performing students



Effective


1

2

3

4

NOT APPLICABLE




45













Effective


Effectiveness

Outcomes

1

2

3

4

5





46

Peer Review













Maureen Mullin 4th

GradeTeacher








47








25

Name of Strategy


Population(s)Person




Clearinghouse)









Daily

ClassroomTeachers


Less Suspensions

Suspension report



LALWRITING K-5

Daily

ClassroomTeachers









26

Name of Strategy


Population(s)Person




Clearinghouse)


Principal







Principal




trends


model)






Name of Strategy

Content

AreaFocus

TargetPopulation(s)

Person Responsible




Clearinghouse)









27





28


Name of Strategy

ContentArea

Focus Target




Clearinghouse)



Writing Workshop-

Oct 5

Literacy K-3 CLI

Administration


Evaluations

Sign-in sheets




Curriculum maps

Instructional plans





Less Suspensions

Suspension report






29


Name of Strategy

ContentArea

Focus Target

Population(s)Person




Clearinghouse)









CLI











30

Name of Strategy

ContentArea

Focus Target

Population(s)Person




Clearinghouse)








31





Yes
















32









33
















Total



White

African-American



Hispanic

Others




34
















White

African-American



Hispanic

Others



Total






35



White

African-American



Hispanic

Others





36



Number amp Percent

Content ampFocus








2 NA


0 NA






37




ContentArea Focus

Target Group

PersonResponsible




Resource

Teachers



Formalinformal



tasks







Content


Person

Responsible











38



Measure



ELL Other SubGroups










NA NA



NA NA



Teacher Developed

Teacher Developed

NA NA


Support Elements





39




From others NA






Principal





40





















41









42



Type of Funds



Amount

Allocated

SIA Amount

Carried Over

Reallocated Use

of SIA





NOT APPLICABLE

NOT APPLICABLE


NJASK -Spring 2011






NA

Spring 2011



NOT APPLICABLE

NOT APPLICABLE


NJASKSpring 2011


NOT APPLICABLE

NOT APPLICABLE


NJASKSpring 2011


instruction


instruction

NJASK

Spring 2012




43

School Budget Pages









44







performing students



Effective


1

2

3

4

NOT APPLICABLE




45













Effective


Effectiveness

Outcomes

1

2

3

4

5





46

Peer Review













Maureen Mullin 4th

GradeTeacher








47








26

Name of Strategy


Population(s)Person




Clearinghouse)


Principal







Principal




trends


model)






Name of Strategy

Content

AreaFocus

TargetPopulation(s)

Person Responsible




Clearinghouse)









27





28


Name of Strategy

ContentArea

Focus Target




Clearinghouse)



Writing Workshop-

Oct 5

Literacy K-3 CLI

Administration


Evaluations

Sign-in sheets




Curriculum maps

Instructional plans





Less Suspensions

Suspension report






29


Name of Strategy

ContentArea

Focus Target

Population(s)Person




Clearinghouse)









CLI











30

Name of Strategy

ContentArea

Focus Target

Population(s)Person




Clearinghouse)








31





Yes
















32









33
















Total



White

African-American



Hispanic

Others




34
















White

African-American



Hispanic

Others



Total






35



White

African-American



Hispanic

Others





36



Number amp Percent

Content ampFocus








2 NA


0 NA






37




ContentArea Focus

Target Group

PersonResponsible




Resource

Teachers



Formalinformal



tasks







Content


Person

Responsible











38



Measure



ELL Other SubGroups










NA NA



NA NA



Teacher Developed

Teacher Developed

NA NA


Support Elements





39




From others NA






Principal





40





















41









42



Type of Funds



Amount

Allocated

SIA Amount

Carried Over

Reallocated Use

of SIA





NOT APPLICABLE

NOT APPLICABLE


NJASK -Spring 2011






NA

Spring 2011



NOT APPLICABLE

NOT APPLICABLE


NJASKSpring 2011


NOT APPLICABLE

NOT APPLICABLE


NJASKSpring 2011


instruction


instruction

NJASK

Spring 2012




43

School Budget Pages









44







performing students



Effective


1

2

3

4

NOT APPLICABLE




45













Effective


Effectiveness

Outcomes

1

2

3

4

5





46

Peer Review













Maureen Mullin 4th

GradeTeacher








47








27





28


Name of Strategy

ContentArea

Focus Target




Clearinghouse)



Writing Workshop-

Oct 5

Literacy K-3 CLI

Administration


Evaluations

Sign-in sheets




Curriculum maps

Instructional plans





Less Suspensions

Suspension report






29


Name of Strategy

ContentArea

Focus Target

Population(s)Person




Clearinghouse)









CLI











30

Name of Strategy

ContentArea

Focus Target

Population(s)Person




Clearinghouse)








31





Yes
















32









33
















Total



White

African-American



Hispanic

Others




34
















White

African-American



Hispanic

Others



Total






35



White

African-American



Hispanic

Others





36



Number amp Percent

Content ampFocus








2 NA


0 NA






37




ContentArea Focus

Target Group

PersonResponsible




Resource

Teachers



Formalinformal



tasks







Content


Person

Responsible











38



Measure



ELL Other SubGroups










NA NA



NA NA



Teacher Developed

Teacher Developed

NA NA


Support Elements





39




From others NA






Principal





40





















41









42



Type of Funds



Amount

Allocated

SIA Amount

Carried Over

Reallocated Use

of SIA





NOT APPLICABLE

NOT APPLICABLE


NJASK -Spring 2011






NA

Spring 2011



NOT APPLICABLE

NOT APPLICABLE


NJASKSpring 2011


NOT APPLICABLE

NOT APPLICABLE


NJASKSpring 2011


instruction


instruction

NJASK

Spring 2012




43

School Budget Pages









44







performing students



Effective


1

2

3

4

NOT APPLICABLE




45













Effective


Effectiveness

Outcomes

1

2

3

4

5





46

Peer Review













Maureen Mullin 4th

GradeTeacher








47








28


Name of Strategy

ContentArea

Focus Target




Clearinghouse)



Writing Workshop-

Oct 5

Literacy K-3 CLI

Administration


Evaluations

Sign-in sheets




Curriculum maps

Instructional plans





Less Suspensions

Suspension report






29


Name of Strategy

ContentArea

Focus Target

Population(s)Person




Clearinghouse)









CLI











30

Name of Strategy

ContentArea

Focus Target

Population(s)Person




Clearinghouse)








31





Yes
















32









33
















Total



White

African-American



Hispanic

Others




34
















White

African-American



Hispanic

Others



Total






35



White

African-American



Hispanic

Others





36



Number amp Percent

Content ampFocus








2 NA


0 NA






37




ContentArea Focus

Target Group

PersonResponsible




Resource

Teachers



Formalinformal



tasks







Content


Person

Responsible











38



Measure



ELL Other SubGroups










NA NA



NA NA



Teacher Developed

Teacher Developed

NA NA


Support Elements





39




From others NA






Principal





40





















41









42



Type of Funds



Amount

Allocated

SIA Amount

Carried Over

Reallocated Use

of SIA





NOT APPLICABLE

NOT APPLICABLE


NJASK -Spring 2011






NA

Spring 2011



NOT APPLICABLE

NOT APPLICABLE


NJASKSpring 2011


NOT APPLICABLE

NOT APPLICABLE


NJASKSpring 2011


instruction


instruction

NJASK

Spring 2012




43

School Budget Pages









44







performing students



Effective


1

2

3

4

NOT APPLICABLE




45













Effective


Effectiveness

Outcomes

1

2

3

4

5





46

Peer Review













Maureen Mullin 4th

GradeTeacher








47








29


Name of Strategy

ContentArea

Focus Target

Population(s)Person




Clearinghouse)









CLI











30

Name of Strategy

ContentArea

Focus Target

Population(s)Person




Clearinghouse)








31





Yes
















32









33
















Total



White

African-American



Hispanic

Others




34
















White

African-American



Hispanic

Others



Total






35



White

African-American



Hispanic

Others





36



Number amp Percent

Content ampFocus








2 NA


0 NA






37




ContentArea Focus

Target Group

PersonResponsible




Resource

Teachers



Formalinformal



tasks







Content


Person

Responsible











38



Measure



ELL Other SubGroups










NA NA



NA NA



Teacher Developed

Teacher Developed

NA NA


Support Elements





39




From others NA






Principal





40





















41









42



Type of Funds



Amount

Allocated

SIA Amount

Carried Over

Reallocated Use

of SIA





NOT APPLICABLE

NOT APPLICABLE


NJASK -Spring 2011






NA

Spring 2011



NOT APPLICABLE

NOT APPLICABLE


NJASKSpring 2011


NOT APPLICABLE

NOT APPLICABLE


NJASKSpring 2011


instruction


instruction

NJASK

Spring 2012




43

School Budget Pages









44







performing students



Effective


1

2

3

4

NOT APPLICABLE




45













Effective


Effectiveness

Outcomes

1

2

3

4

5





46

Peer Review













Maureen Mullin 4th

GradeTeacher








47








30

Name of Strategy

ContentArea

Focus Target

Population(s)Person




Clearinghouse)








31





Yes
















32









33
















Total



White

African-American



Hispanic

Others




34
















White

African-American



Hispanic

Others



Total






35



White

African-American



Hispanic

Others





36



Number amp Percent

Content ampFocus








2 NA


0 NA






37




ContentArea Focus

Target Group

PersonResponsible




Resource

Teachers



Formalinformal



tasks







Content


Person

Responsible











38



Measure



ELL Other SubGroups










NA NA



NA NA



Teacher Developed

Teacher Developed

NA NA


Support Elements





39




From others NA






Principal





40





















41









42



Type of Funds



Amount

Allocated

SIA Amount

Carried Over

Reallocated Use

of SIA





NOT APPLICABLE

NOT APPLICABLE


NJASK -Spring 2011






NA

Spring 2011



NOT APPLICABLE

NOT APPLICABLE


NJASKSpring 2011


NOT APPLICABLE

NOT APPLICABLE


NJASKSpring 2011


instruction


instruction

NJASK

Spring 2012




43

School Budget Pages









44







performing students



Effective


1

2

3

4

NOT APPLICABLE




45













Effective


Effectiveness

Outcomes

1

2

3

4

5





46

Peer Review













Maureen Mullin 4th

GradeTeacher








47








31





Yes
















32









33
















Total



White

African-American



Hispanic

Others




34
















White

African-American



Hispanic

Others



Total






35



White

African-American



Hispanic

Others





36



Number amp Percent

Content ampFocus








2 NA


0 NA






37




ContentArea Focus

Target Group

PersonResponsible




Resource

Teachers



Formalinformal



tasks







Content


Person

Responsible











38



Measure



ELL Other SubGroups










NA NA



NA NA



Teacher Developed

Teacher Developed

NA NA


Support Elements





39




From others NA






Principal





40





















41









42



Type of Funds



Amount

Allocated

SIA Amount

Carried Over

Reallocated Use

of SIA





NOT APPLICABLE

NOT APPLICABLE


NJASK -Spring 2011






NA

Spring 2011



NOT APPLICABLE

NOT APPLICABLE


NJASKSpring 2011


NOT APPLICABLE

NOT APPLICABLE


NJASKSpring 2011


instruction


instruction

NJASK

Spring 2012




43

School Budget Pages









44







performing students



Effective


1

2

3

4

NOT APPLICABLE




45













Effective


Effectiveness

Outcomes

1

2

3

4

5





46

Peer Review













Maureen Mullin 4th

GradeTeacher








47








32









33
















Total



White

African-American



Hispanic

Others




34
















White

African-American



Hispanic

Others



Total






35



White

African-American



Hispanic

Others





36



Number amp Percent

Content ampFocus








2 NA


0 NA






37




ContentArea Focus

Target Group

PersonResponsible




Resource

Teachers



Formalinformal



tasks







Content


Person

Responsible











38



Measure



ELL Other SubGroups










NA NA



NA NA



Teacher Developed

Teacher Developed

NA NA


Support Elements





39




From others NA






Principal





40





















41









42



Type of Funds



Amount

Allocated

SIA Amount

Carried Over

Reallocated Use

of SIA





NOT APPLICABLE

NOT APPLICABLE


NJASK -Spring 2011






NA

Spring 2011



NOT APPLICABLE

NOT APPLICABLE


NJASKSpring 2011


NOT APPLICABLE

NOT APPLICABLE


NJASKSpring 2011


instruction


instruction

NJASK

Spring 2012




43

School Budget Pages









44







performing students



Effective


1

2

3

4

NOT APPLICABLE




45













Effective


Effectiveness

Outcomes

1

2

3

4

5





46

Peer Review













Maureen Mullin 4th

GradeTeacher








47








33
















Total



White

African-American



Hispanic

Others




34
















White

African-American



Hispanic

Others



Total






35



White

African-American



Hispanic

Others





36



Number amp Percent

Content ampFocus








2 NA


0 NA






37




ContentArea Focus

Target Group

PersonResponsible




Resource

Teachers



Formalinformal



tasks







Content


Person

Responsible











38



Measure



ELL Other SubGroups










NA NA



NA NA



Teacher Developed

Teacher Developed

NA NA


Support Elements





39




From others NA






Principal





40





















41









42



Type of Funds



Amount

Allocated

SIA Amount

Carried Over

Reallocated Use

of SIA





NOT APPLICABLE

NOT APPLICABLE


NJASK -Spring 2011






NA

Spring 2011



NOT APPLICABLE

NOT APPLICABLE


NJASKSpring 2011


NOT APPLICABLE

NOT APPLICABLE


NJASKSpring 2011


instruction


instruction

NJASK

Spring 2012




43

School Budget Pages









44







performing students



Effective


1

2

3

4

NOT APPLICABLE




45













Effective


Effectiveness

Outcomes

1

2

3

4

5





46

Peer Review













Maureen Mullin 4th

GradeTeacher








47








34
















White

African-American



Hispanic

Others



Total






35



White

African-American



Hispanic

Others





36



Number amp Percent

Content ampFocus








2 NA


0 NA






37




ContentArea Focus

Target Group

PersonResponsible




Resource

Teachers



Formalinformal



tasks







Content


Person

Responsible











38



Measure



ELL Other SubGroups










NA NA



NA NA



Teacher Developed

Teacher Developed

NA NA


Support Elements





39




From others NA






Principal





40





















41









42



Type of Funds



Amount

Allocated

SIA Amount

Carried Over

Reallocated Use

of SIA





NOT APPLICABLE

NOT APPLICABLE


NJASK -Spring 2011






NA

Spring 2011



NOT APPLICABLE

NOT APPLICABLE


NJASKSpring 2011


NOT APPLICABLE

NOT APPLICABLE


NJASKSpring 2011


instruction


instruction

NJASK

Spring 2012




43

School Budget Pages









44







performing students



Effective


1

2

3

4

NOT APPLICABLE




45













Effective


Effectiveness

Outcomes

1

2

3

4

5





46

Peer Review













Maureen Mullin 4th

GradeTeacher








47








35



White

African-American



Hispanic

Others





36



Number amp Percent

Content ampFocus








2 NA


0 NA






37




ContentArea Focus

Target Group

PersonResponsible




Resource

Teachers



Formalinformal



tasks







Content


Person

Responsible











38



Measure



ELL Other SubGroups










NA NA



NA NA



Teacher Developed

Teacher Developed

NA NA


Support Elements





39




From others NA






Principal





40





















41









42



Type of Funds



Amount

Allocated

SIA Amount

Carried Over

Reallocated Use

of SIA





NOT APPLICABLE

NOT APPLICABLE


NJASK -Spring 2011






NA

Spring 2011



NOT APPLICABLE

NOT APPLICABLE


NJASKSpring 2011


NOT APPLICABLE

NOT APPLICABLE


NJASKSpring 2011


instruction


instruction

NJASK

Spring 2012




43

School Budget Pages









44







performing students



Effective


1

2

3

4

NOT APPLICABLE




45













Effective


Effectiveness

Outcomes

1

2

3

4

5





46

Peer Review













Maureen Mullin 4th

GradeTeacher








47








36



Number amp Percent

Content ampFocus








2 NA


0 NA






37




ContentArea Focus

Target Group

PersonResponsible




Resource

Teachers



Formalinformal



tasks







Content


Person

Responsible











38



Measure



ELL Other SubGroups










NA NA



NA NA



Teacher Developed

Teacher Developed

NA NA


Support Elements





39




From others NA






Principal





40





















41









42



Type of Funds



Amount

Allocated

SIA Amount

Carried Over

Reallocated Use

of SIA





NOT APPLICABLE

NOT APPLICABLE


NJASK -Spring 2011






NA

Spring 2011



NOT APPLICABLE

NOT APPLICABLE


NJASKSpring 2011


NOT APPLICABLE

NOT APPLICABLE


NJASKSpring 2011


instruction


instruction

NJASK

Spring 2012




43

School Budget Pages









44







performing students



Effective


1

2

3

4

NOT APPLICABLE




45













Effective


Effectiveness

Outcomes

1

2

3

4

5





46

Peer Review













Maureen Mullin 4th

GradeTeacher








47








37




ContentArea Focus

Target Group

PersonResponsible




Resource

Teachers



Formalinformal



tasks







Content


Person

Responsible











38



Measure



ELL Other SubGroups










NA NA



NA NA



Teacher Developed

Teacher Developed

NA NA


Support Elements





39




From others NA






Principal





40





















41









42



Type of Funds



Amount

Allocated

SIA Amount

Carried Over

Reallocated Use

of SIA





NOT APPLICABLE

NOT APPLICABLE


NJASK -Spring 2011






NA

Spring 2011



NOT APPLICABLE

NOT APPLICABLE


NJASKSpring 2011


NOT APPLICABLE

NOT APPLICABLE


NJASKSpring 2011


instruction


instruction

NJASK

Spring 2012




43

School Budget Pages









44







performing students



Effective


1

2

3

4

NOT APPLICABLE




45













Effective


Effectiveness

Outcomes

1

2

3

4

5





46

Peer Review













Maureen Mullin 4th

GradeTeacher








47








38



Measure



ELL Other SubGroups










NA NA



NA NA



Teacher Developed

Teacher Developed

NA NA


Support Elements





39




From others NA






Principal





40





















41









42



Type of Funds



Amount

Allocated

SIA Amount

Carried Over

Reallocated Use

of SIA





NOT APPLICABLE

NOT APPLICABLE


NJASK -Spring 2011






NA

Spring 2011



NOT APPLICABLE

NOT APPLICABLE


NJASKSpring 2011


NOT APPLICABLE

NOT APPLICABLE


NJASKSpring 2011


instruction


instruction

NJASK

Spring 2012




43

School Budget Pages









44







performing students



Effective


1

2

3

4

NOT APPLICABLE




45













Effective


Effectiveness

Outcomes

1

2

3

4

5





46

Peer Review













Maureen Mullin 4th

GradeTeacher








47








39




From others NA






Principal





40





















41









42



Type of Funds



Amount

Allocated

SIA Amount

Carried Over

Reallocated Use

of SIA





NOT APPLICABLE

NOT APPLICABLE


NJASK -Spring 2011






NA

Spring 2011



NOT APPLICABLE

NOT APPLICABLE


NJASKSpring 2011


NOT APPLICABLE

NOT APPLICABLE


NJASKSpring 2011


instruction


instruction

NJASK

Spring 2012




43

School Budget Pages









44







performing students



Effective


1

2

3

4

NOT APPLICABLE




45













Effective


Effectiveness

Outcomes

1

2

3

4

5





46

Peer Review













Maureen Mullin 4th

GradeTeacher








47








40





















41









42



Type of Funds



Amount

Allocated

SIA Amount

Carried Over

Reallocated Use

of SIA





NOT APPLICABLE

NOT APPLICABLE


NJASK -Spring 2011






NA

Spring 2011



NOT APPLICABLE

NOT APPLICABLE


NJASKSpring 2011


NOT APPLICABLE

NOT APPLICABLE


NJASKSpring 2011


instruction


instruction

NJASK

Spring 2012




43

School Budget Pages









44







performing students



Effective


1

2

3

4

NOT APPLICABLE




45













Effective


Effectiveness

Outcomes

1

2

3

4

5





46

Peer Review













Maureen Mullin 4th

GradeTeacher








47








41









42



Type of Funds



Amount

Allocated

SIA Amount

Carried Over

Reallocated Use

of SIA





NOT APPLICABLE

NOT APPLICABLE


NJASK -Spring 2011






NA

Spring 2011



NOT APPLICABLE

NOT APPLICABLE


NJASKSpring 2011


NOT APPLICABLE

NOT APPLICABLE


NJASKSpring 2011


instruction


instruction

NJASK

Spring 2012




43

School Budget Pages









44







performing students



Effective


1

2

3

4

NOT APPLICABLE




45













Effective


Effectiveness

Outcomes

1

2

3

4

5





46

Peer Review













Maureen Mullin 4th

GradeTeacher








47








42



Type of Funds



Amount

Allocated

SIA Amount

Carried Over

Reallocated Use

of SIA





NOT APPLICABLE

NOT APPLICABLE


NJASK -Spring 2011






NA

Spring 2011



NOT APPLICABLE

NOT APPLICABLE


NJASKSpring 2011


NOT APPLICABLE

NOT APPLICABLE


NJASKSpring 2011


instruction


instruction

NJASK

Spring 2012




43

School Budget Pages









44







performing students



Effective


1

2

3

4

NOT APPLICABLE




45













Effective


Effectiveness

Outcomes

1

2

3

4

5





46

Peer Review













Maureen Mullin 4th

GradeTeacher








47








43

School Budget Pages









44







performing students



Effective


1

2

3

4

NOT APPLICABLE




45













Effective


Effectiveness

Outcomes

1

2

3

4

5





46

Peer Review













Maureen Mullin 4th

GradeTeacher








47








44







performing students



Effective


1

2

3

4

NOT APPLICABLE




45













Effective


Effectiveness

Outcomes

1

2

3

4

5





46

Peer Review













Maureen Mullin 4th

GradeTeacher








47








45













Effective


Effectiveness

Outcomes

1

2

3

4

5





46

Peer Review













Maureen Mullin 4th

GradeTeacher








47








46

Peer Review













Maureen Mullin 4th

GradeTeacher








47








47





plainfield fy12 dewitt barlow unified plan 12-22-11

Documents