pilot plant testing of piperazine (pz) with advanced flash ... library/events/2016/c02 cap...
TRANSCRIPT
Pilot Plant Testing of Piperazine (PZ) with Advanced Flash Regeneration
Gary T. Rochelle (PI) & Eric ChenThe University of Texas at Austin
Katherine Dombrowski (PM), AECOM
Andrew Sexton (TE), Trimeric
Bruce Lani, DOE PM1
86 psia/5.7 bar254 F/123 C
307 F/153 C
240 F/116 C
302 F/150 C
152 F/67 C
Rich25 gpmLdg=0.4
LeanLdg=0.22
Cold BypassExchanger
Condenser
StripperSteamHeater
Hot CrossExchanger
CO2
Cold RichBypass2 gpm
Warm RichBypass9 gpm
242 F/117 C
100 psia Steam319 F/159 C
Advanced Flash Stripper with 5 m PZ for NCCC
2
Outline
• Funding and objectives : NCCC summer 2017• Equipment for NCCC: small stripper • Capital and Energy << MEA• Solvent Management of PZ - prepared
3
Project Budget ($million)
4
Cost share by CO2 Capture Pilot Plant Project (C2P3)
BP1 BP2 TotalFederal 1.6 3.0 4.7Cost Share 1.1 0.3 1.3Total 2.7 3.3 6.0
Objective is to develop PZ with advanced regeneration at 150°C
• Optimize solvent (8m vs 5m)• Demonstrate resistance to
oxidation, nitrosation, & corrosionPZ
• Two stage flash (2SF)• Advanced flash stripper (AFS)Regeneration
• Formation and control• CharacterizationAerosols
5
Phased testing at UT SRP and NCCC to optimize PZ absorption/regeneration
• 2SF• 8m PZ
SRP 2011
• 1SF• 5m PZ• Aerosol
SRP 2013
• AFS• 5 vs 8m• Aerosol
SRP 2015
• AFS• 5m PZ• Aerosol
NCCC 2017
6
Completed Completed Completed Construction in progress
0.1 MW 0.5 MWCO2 in air Flue gas
BP1 BP2
Our test window: Jun-Aug 2017
7
2015 2016 2017Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Activity Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 Q7 Q8 Q9
Skid Process Design
Package for HAZOP
Skid Procurement
Skid Fabrication
Skid Installation
Water Test
Commissioning
Start-Up
Field Campaign
Site Restoration
Analysis/Reporting
8
74 ft18 inch
40 ft Packing
107 ft26 inch
60 ft packing
33 ft10/20 inch
13 ft packing
Contactors (to scale)NCCC AFS
Default 5 m PZ
40 ftpacking
Absorber Absorber StripperStripper
AFS Heat Exchangers
9
Application Q (kBt/uhr)
Side(inches2)
Volume(ft3)
Type
Stm heater 650 32x32 17 Compabloc
Hot Cross 644 85x61 104 P&F
Cold Rich 143 25x51 17 P&f
Condenser 28 22x36 10 P&F
Cold Cross(existing)
102 x 78 147 P&F
Capital Cost < MEA w Simple Stripper
AFS < Simple stripper• Total exchanger duty of AFS ≤ Simple stripper• Total no. of exchangers of AFS ≈ Simple stripper
– Size limited so multiple exchangers are needed– Arrange in series rather than parallel
5 m PZ < 7 m MEA• Absorber for PZ<MEA (2 x faster absorption)• Stripper for PZ<MEA (2-3 x greater P & <Qreb)• Compressor for PZ<MEA (2-3 x greater P)
11
Advanced amine scrubbing gives 50% eff;Limited by capital-energy tradeoff
0
15
30
45
Weq
(kJ/
mol
CO2)
DOE Case 10MEA/SS
(120°C, Pstrp=1.6 bar)
SRP 2015PZ/AFS
(150°C, Pstrp=6 bar)
Wmin,comp
Wmin,sep
Wlost,absorber
Wlost,cross X
Wlost,reboiler
Wlost,comp
Wlost,others
13
Advanced Flash Stripper with other solvents
14
Solvent kg’(10-7mol/Pa-s-m2)
Weq(kJ/mol CO2)
Simple stripper AFS
7m MEA 4.3 36.3 32.7
10m DGA 3.6 37.0 34.2
8m PZ 8.5 34.9 31.4
5m PZ 11.3 36.5 32.3
2m PZ/3m HMPD 10.1 34.9 31.0
• 𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅 𝑃𝑃𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶2∗ = 5 𝑘𝑘𝑃𝑃𝑘𝑘, 𝐿𝐿𝐿𝐿𝑘𝑘𝐿𝐿 𝑃𝑃𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶2
∗ = 0.2 𝑘𝑘𝑃𝑃𝑘𝑘
• Optimum cross exchanger ∆𝑇𝑇𝐿𝐿𝐿𝐿 = 5𝐾𝐾 𝜇𝜇𝜇𝜇𝑀𝑀𝑀𝑀𝑀𝑀
0.175
PZ losses and environmental impact• Resistant to corrosion, use more carbon steel• Moderate volatility
– Manage losses w water wash– Manage impurities with thermal reclaiming
• Resistant to Degradation– Thermally stable to 150°C– Oxidation, 4x less than MEA– Nitrosation, decompose at 150oC
• Manage aerosol w grow and capture• Manage solid precipitation w rich storage 15
Corrosion at stripper T, no O2
17
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
100 110 120 130 140 150 160
Cor
rosi
on R
ate
(µm
/yr)
T (°C)
4 m HTOR PZ, 1010 CS
3 m Tarong PZ316 L SS
3 m Tarong PZ, 1010 CS
8 m SRP PZ, 316 L SS
8 m SRP PZ, 1010 CS
D.O. Consumption and Metals Cycling in HTOR
18
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5
NH
3(m
mol
/kg/
hr) (
FTIR
)
Fe2+ (mmol/kg) (ICP-OES)
0.23 mol NH3/(cycle-mol Fe2+)+ 0.05 mmol NH3/(kg-cycle) due to D.O.
(~50% D.O. consumption per cycle)
+90 mM Inh A
+100 mM Inh A
D.O. Stripping
D.O. Stripping
NH3 rate with D.O. stripping or Inh A
NH3 rate
0.8-1 mole NH3/mole PZ oxidized
Oxidation Mitigation
19
• Reaction w D.O.: 0.05 mmol/kg/cycle in HTOR• Minimize holdup at high temperature before stripper
• Metals cycling: +0.23 mmol/(kg-cycle-mmol/kg Fe2+)• Fe2+ solubilized by accumulation of degradation products
• Oxidation Fe2+ accumulation more oxidation• NO2MNPZ Oxidation in pilots w/ coal flue gas• Prescrub NO2 and reclaim solvent to minimize Fe2+
PZ can be used w/o solid precipitationOn shutdown, drain to rich storage
0
10
20
30
40
50
0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 0.4 0.45
Tran
sitio
n T
(°C)
CO2 loading (mol/mol alkalinity)
5 m PZ 8 m PZ
Solution
PZ∙6H2O (s)
Operating RangeOverstrip Saturation
20
0.22 0.26
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1
Dia
met
er (u
m)
Z/Ztot
Water Wash10 ft RSP250
Intercooling
Absorber2X10 ft RSP 250
Manage PZ aerosol by Grow and captureCalculated Aerosol Growth for SRP run 1
5 m PZ, L/G=3.6, 83% removal
Conclusions
• The Advanced Flash stripper will reduce Weq by 10-20% for PZ and other solvents
• 5 m PZ is a superior solvent• Fast absorption, thermally stable, high P stripper• Good resistance to corrosion, oxidation • Manage aerosol and solids
• 5 m PZ with the AFS will reduce capital cost
22
• Acknowledgement: “This material is based on work supported in part by the Department of Energy under Award Number DE-FE0005654.”
• Disclaimer: “This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof.” 23