phytoremediation of heavy metals from urban waste leachate by southern cattail (typha domingensis)
DESCRIPTION
Amin Mojiri, Hamidi Abdul Aziz, Mohammad Ali Zahed, Shuokr Qarani Aziz, M. Razip B. SelamatTRANSCRIPT
International Journal of Scientific Research in Environmental Sciences (IJSRES), 1(4), pp. 63-70, 2013 Available online at http://www.ijsrpub.com/ijsres
ISSN: 2322-4983; ©2013 IJSRPUB
63
Full Length Research Paper
Phytoremediation of Heavy Metals from Urban Waste Leachate by Southern Cattail
(Typha domingensis)
Amin Mojiri1*
, Hamidi Abdul Aziz1, Mohammad Ali Zahed
2, Shuokr Qarani Aziz
3, M. Razip B. Selamat
1
1School of Civil Engineering, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 14300 Nibong Tebal, Penang, Malaysia
2Department of Civil Engineering, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849, USA
3Department of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, Salahaddin University, Erbil, Iraq
*Corresponding Author E-Mail: [email protected] Tel: +60169836292, Fax: +60345995999
Received 12 February 2013, Accepted 3 March 2013
Abstract. The effectiveness of southern cattail (Typha domingensis) for phytoremediation of heavy metals from municipal
waste leachate was investigated. Some plants were transplanted into pots containing 10 liters of mixed urban waste leachate
and water (3/1 V: V) and aerated during experiments. Central composite design (CCD) and response surface methodology
(RSM) were used in order to clarify the nature of the response surface in the experimental design and explain the optimal
conditions of the independent variables. In the optimum conditions, the amount of removed Pb, Ni and Cd were 0.9725,
0.4681, and 0.3692 mg/kg, and Translocation Factor (TF) in 24, 48 and 72 h experiment were 1, 1.07, 1.00, 1.11, 1.32, 1.00,
1.5 1.20 and 1.02 for each heavy metal (Pb, Ni, and Cd) respectively. The findings show that Typha domingensis is an effective
accumulator plant for phytoremediation of these heavy metals.
Key words: Heavy metals; Phytoremediation; Typha domingensis; Waste leachate; Cattail
1. INTRODUCTION
The use of plants for remediation of soils and waters
polluted with heavy metals, has gained acceptance in
the past two decades as a cost effective and non-
invasive method (Mojiri, 2012). This approach is
emerging as an innovative tool with great potential
that is most useful when pollutants are within the root
zone of the plants (top three to six feet).
Furthermore, phytoremediation is energy efficient,
cost-effective, aesthetically pleasing technique of
remediation sites with low to moderate levels of
contamination. The method of phytoremediation
exploits the use of either naturally occurring metal
hyper accumulator plants or genetically engineered
plants (Setia et al. 2008). A variety of polluted waters
can be phytoremediated, counting sewage and
municipal wastewater, agricultural runoff/drainage
water, industrial wastewater, coal pile runoff, landfill
leachate, mine drainage, and groundwater
plumes (Olguín and Galván, 2010).
A rising method for polluted area remediation is
phytoextraction (Ok and Kim, 2007). Phytoextraction
is the uptake of pollutants by plant roots and
translocation within the plants. Pollutants are
generally removed by harvesting the plants, and it has
been recognized as an appropriated approach to
remove pollutants from soil, sediment and sludge
(Singh et al., 2011). Plants may play a vital role in
metal removal through absorption, cation exchange,
filtration, and chemical changes through the root.
There is evidence that wetland plants such as
Typhalatifolia, Cyperus malaccensis and etc. can
accumulate heavy metals in their tissues (Yadav and
Chandra, 2011).
Typha is often found close to water, in lakes,
lagoons and riverine areas of numerous regions of the
world, in America, Europe and Asia (Esteves et al.,
2008). Typha is a highly flood-tolerant species with
the capacity for internal pressurized gas flow to
rhizomes through a well-developed aerenchyma
system that provides oxygen for root growth in
anaerobic substrates (Li et al. 2010). Southern cattail
(Typha domingensis) is highly salt-tolerant and
considered as the potential source of pulp and fiber
(Khider et al., 2012).
Dipu et al. (2012) conducted a study to determine
the efficiency of an emergent wetland plant species
Typha sp. and floating wetland macrophytes such as
Pistia sp., Azolla sp., Lemna sp., Salvinia sp., and
Eichhornia sp. in phytoremediation of various heavy
metals with addition of a chelating agent such as
EDTA.
The aims of the study were to investigate the
phytoremediation of heavy metals from urban waste
leachate by Typha domingensis and optimization of
process parameters using the response surface
methodology (RSM). This technique has been
employed for modelling and optimization of plant
uptakes (Hu et al., 2006; Abhilash et al., 2011) as well
as bioremediation (Zahed et al., 2010; Mohajeri et al.,
Mojiri et al.
Phytoremediation of Heavy Metals from Urban Waste Leachate by Southern Cattail (Typha domingensis)
64
2010) and phytoremediation (Cordova et al., 2011;
Akinibile et al., 2012).
2. MATERIALS AND METHODS
2.1. Sample Preparation
The plants were transplanted into pots containing 10
liters of mixed urban waste leachate and water (mixed
75 percentages of waste located with 25 percentage of
water; V: V), and aeration was done in 2011. Central
composite design and response surface methodology
were used in order to clarify the nature of the response
surface in the experimental design and explain the
optimal conditions of the independent variables.
Different number of Typha domingensis transplanting
in each pot (2 to 4 Typha domingensis) and different
lengths of time for taking samples (24 to 72 hours)
were used.
Table 1: Waste leachate and water properties
pH EC
(dS m-1
)
N
(mg/L)
BOD5
(mg/L)
Fe
(mg/L)
Mn
(mg/L)
Zn
(mg/L)
Pb
(mg/L)
Ni
(mg/L)
Cd
(mg/L)
Water
7.00 0.23 ND - ND ND ND ND ND ND
Urban Waste leachate
5.84 28.72 0.71 27.18 80.013 16.011 17.11 2.218 1.092 0.925 ND: Not Detected, MDL: 10 µg/L
Table 2: Experimental variables and results for the removal metals
Run Variables Response
A: number of plants
transplanting
B: Time for taking
samples
(hours)
Amount of Pb
removed.
(mg/kg)
Amount of Ni
removed.
(mg/kg)
Amount of Cd
removed.
(mg/kg)
1 2 48 0.800 0.343 0.300
2 4 48 0.901 0.420 0.341
3 3 48 0.870 0.383 0.314
4 2 24 0.703 0.380 0.282
5 3 48 0.881 0.397 0.322
6 4 72 1.130 0.589 0.447
7 3 48 0.882 0.398 0.322
8 3 72 0.997 0.492 0.386
9 2 72 0.798 0.372 0.300
10 3 48 0.879 0.399 0.327
11 3 48 0.889 0.390 0.318
12 4 24 0.802 0.341 0.301
13 3 24 0.76 0.437 0.310
2.2. Laboratory Analysis
The plant tissues were prepared for laboratory analysis
by Wet Digestion method (Campbell and Plank,
1998). Extractable lead (Pb), nickel (Ni) and cadmium
(Cd) in waste leachate and plant tissues were carried
out using a flame atomic absorption spectrometer
(Varian Spectra 20 Plus, Mulgrave, Australia) in
accordance to the Standard Methods (APHA, 2005).
Waste leachate and water properties are shown in
Table 1.
2.3. Statistical Analysis
Central composite design (CCD) and Response
surface methodology (RSM) were employed in order
to clarify the nature of the response surface in the
experimental design and elucidate the optimal
conditions of the independent variables. CCD was
established through Design Expert Software (6.0.7).
The behavior of the system is described through
equation 1 an empirical second-order polynomial
model:
xxxx ijiji
iji
i
k
iiii
k
i
iY11
2
110
(1)
where Y is the response; Xi and Xj are the
variables; β0 is a constant coefficient; βj, βjj, and βij are
the interaction coefficients of linear, quadratic and
second-order terms, respectively; k is the number of
study factors; and e is the error.
The results were completely analyzed by analysis
of variance (ANOVA) in the Design Expert Software.
Number of Typha domingensis transplanting (2, 3, and
4) and times for taking samples (24, 48, and 72 hours)
were used. To carry out an adequate analysis, three
International Journal of Scientific Research in Environmental Sciences (IJSRES), 1(4), pp. 63-70, 2013
65
dependent parameters (reducing lead, nickel, and
cadmium concentration in leachate) were measured as
responses (Table 2).
Descriptive statistical analysis including mean
comparison of Pb, Ni and Cd accumulation in the
roots and shoots of the plants using Duncan’s Multiple
Range Test (DMRT) was conducted using the SPSS
software.
3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS
Waste leachate properties before the experiment, the
results of the experiments, ANOVA results for
response parameter, and comparing the means of Pb,
Ni and Cd accumulation in Typha domingensis roots,
and shoots are shown in Tables 2.
Table 3: ANOVA results for response parameter
Response Final equation in terms of actual
factors
Prob. R2 Adj.R
2 SD CV PRESS Prob.LOF
Pb
Removal
0.7321-0.0278A-0.003B-0.003AB 0.0001 0.9520 0.9360 0.027 3.15 0.025 0.0033
Ni
Removal
0.05318+0.0788A-0.0152B-
0.0273A2-0.0050B
2-.003AB
0.0001 0.9554 0.9235 0.018 4.46 0.020 0.0113
Cd
Removal
0.3432+0.0157A-0.003B-0.005B-
0.003AB
0.0001 0.9623 0.9354 0.011 3.27 0.030 0.0222
Prob.: Probability of error; R2: Coefficient of determination; Ad. R2: Adjusted R2; Adec. P.: Adequate precision; SD: Standard deviation; CV: Coefficient of
variance; PRESS: Predicted residual error sum of square; Prob. LOF: Probability of lack of fit Where A is number of Typha domingensis transplanting, and B is time for taking samples
Table 4: Comparison the heavy metals TF in Typha domingensis after 24, 48 and 72 hours
Metals(mg/L) Time(h) Plants TF Time(h) Plants TF Time(h) Plants TF
Root Shoot -
48
Root Shoot -
72
Root Shoot -
Pb 24 0.291a+
0.292a 1.00 0.401a 0.448f 1.11 0.700a 0.739f 1.05
Ni 0.102b 0.110b 1.07 0.209b 0.277g 1.32 0.312b 0.375g 1.20
Cd 0.096c 0.096c 1.00 0.128c 0.129h 1.00 0.293c 0.300h 1.02 + Numbers followed by same letters in each column are not significantly (P<0.05) different according to the DMR test
In this work, the RSM was used for analyzing the
correlation between the variables (number of Typha
domingensis transplanting and the lengths of time for
taking samples) and the important process response
(the amount of removed Pb, Ni, and Cd). Predicted vs.
actual values plot for metal removals are shown in
Figures 1. Considerable model terms were preferred to
achieve the best fit in a particular model. CCD
permitted the development of mathematical equations
where predicted results (Y) were evaluated as a
function of the number of Typha domingensis
transplanting (A) and the lengths of time for taking
samples (B). The results were computed as the sum of
a constant, two first order effects (terms in A and B),
one interaction effect (AB), and two second-order
effects (A2 and B
2), as shown in the equation (Table
3). The results were analyzed by ANOVA to
determine the accuracy of fit.
The model was significant at the 5% confidence
level because probability values were less than 0.05.
The lack of fit (LOF) F-test explains variation of the
data around the modified model. LOF would be
significant, if the model did not fit the data well.
Generally, large probability values for LOF (>0.05)
explained that the F-statistic was insignificant,
implying a significant model relationship between
variables and process responses.
3.1. Lead (Pb) Removed
The amount of removed Pb ranged from 0.703 mg/kg
(2 plants transplanting, and 24 hours of time for taking
samples) to 1.130 mg/kg (4 plants transplanting, and
72 hours of time for taking samples). The
phytoremediation of Pb increased when the number of
plants transplanting and time for taking samples were
increased.
3.2. Nickel (Ni) Removed
The amount of removed Ni ranged from 0.341 mg/kg
(3 plants transplanting, and 24 hours of time for taking
samples) to 0.589 mg/kg (4 plants transplanting, and
72 hours of time for taking samples). The
phytoremediation of Ni increased when the number of
plants transplanting and time for taking samples were
increased.
Mojiri et al.
Phytoremediation of Heavy Metals from Urban Waste Leachate by Southern Cattail (Typha domingensis)
66
(a) (b)
(c)
Fig. 1: The design expert statistical plots - predicted versus actual plot: (a) Pb, (b)Ni, (c) Cd
3.3. Cadmium (Cd) Removed
The amount of removed Cd ranged from 0.282 mg/kg
(2 plants transplanting, and 24 hours of time for taking
samples) to 0.447 mg/kg (4 plants transplanting and
72 hours of time for taking samples). The
phytoremediation of Cd increased when the number of
plants transplanting and time for taking samples were
increased.
3.4. Uptake of Heavy Metals by Plant
Soluble metals can enter into the root symplast by
crossing the plasma membrane of the root endodermal
cells, or they can enter the root apoplast through the
space between cells. While it is possible for solutes to
travel up through the plant by apoplastic flow, the
more efficient method of moving up the plant is
through the vasculature of the plant, called the xylem.
To enter the xylem, solutes must cross the Casparian
strip, a waxy coating, which is impermeable to
solutes, unless they pass through the cells of the
endodermis. Therefore, to enter the xylem, metals
must cross a membrane, probably through the action
of a membrane pump or channel. Once loaded into the
xylem, the flow of the xylem sap will transport the
metal to the leaves, where it must be loaded into the
cells of the leaf, again crossing a membrane. The cell
types where the metals are deposited vary between
hyper-accumulator species (Peer et al., 2005).
International Journal of Scientific Research in Environmental Sciences (IJSRES), 1(4), pp. 63-70, 2013
67
(a) (b)
(c)
Fig. 2: The 3D surface plots of heavy metal removal: (a) pb, (b) Ni, (c) Cd
Metal accumulating plant species can concentrate
heavy metals like Cd, Zn, Co, Mn, Ni, and Pb up to
100 or 1000 times more than those taken up by non-
accumulator (excluder) plants. The uptake
performance by plant can be greatly improved
(Tangahu et al., 2011).
The concentrations of lead (ppm) in the roots of
Typha domingensis were 0.291, 0.401, and 0.700, and
in the shoots of Typha domingensis were 0.292, 0.448,
and 0.739, after 24, 48, and 72 hours, respectively.
The lead is not necessary for plant growth and
considered as contaminated at the concentration of 30-
300 μg g-1
in plant tissues Mojiri (2012).
The concentrations of nickel (ppm) in the roots of
Typha domingensis were 0.102, 0.209, and 0.312, and
in the shoots of Typha domingensis were 0.110, 0.277,
and 0.375, after 24, 48, and 72 hours, respectively.
The concentrations of cadmium (ppm) in the roots of
Typha domingensis were 0.096, 0.128, and 0.293 and
in shoots of Typha domingensis were 0.096, 0.129,
and 0.300, after 24, 48, and 72 hours, respectively.
3.5. Translocation factor (TF)
The efficiency of phytoremediation can be quantified
by calculating translocation factor. The TF expresses
the capacity of a plant to store the MTE in its upper
part. This is defined as the ratio of metal concentration
in the upper part to that in the roots (Chakroun et al.,
2010). The translocation factor indicates the efficiency
Mojiri et al.
Phytoremediation of Heavy Metals from Urban Waste Leachate by Southern Cattail (Typha domingensis)
68
of the plant in translocating the accumulated metal
from its roots to shoots. It is calculated as follows
(Padmavathiamma and Li, 2007).
RootC
CTFFactorionTranslocat Shoot)( (2)
where Cshoot is the concentration of the metal in
plant shoots and Croot is the concentration of the metal
in plant roots.
Based on Table 4, translocation factors (TF) were
more than 1 in all treatments. A translocation factor
value greater than 1 indicates the translocation of the
metal from root to above-ground part (Jamil et al.
2009). According to Yoon et al. (2006), only plant
species with TF greater than 1 have the potential to be
used for phytoextraction.
4. CONCLUSION
Phytoremediation of heavy metals from urban waste
leachate by Typha domingensis was studied. CCD and
RSM were used in the design of experiments,
statistical analysis and optimization of the parameters.
The factors were number of Typha domingensis
transplanting (2, 3, and 4) and time for taking samples
(24, 48, and 72 hours); while the responses were
removals of Pb, Ni and Cd. The findings clarified that
the Typha domingensis is an effective accumulator
plant for phytoremediation of Pb, Ni and Cd.
Statistical analysis via Design Expert Software (6.0.7)
showed that the optimum conditions for the number of
Typha domingensis transplanting and the time for
taking samples were 3.33 and 61.90 hours,
respectively. For the optimized factors, the amount of
removed pollutants Pb, Ni and Cd (ppm) were 0.9725,
0.4681, and 0.3692 mg/kg, respectively.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to acknowledge the University
Sains Malaysia (USM) for their supports.
REFERENCES
Abhilash PC, Srivastava S, Srivastava P, Singh B,
Jafri A, Singh N (2011). Influence of
rhizospheric microbial inoculation and tolerant
plant species on the rhizoremediation of
lindane. Environmental and Experimental
Botany, 74: 127-130.
Akinbile CO, Yusoff MS, Shian LM (2012). Leachate
Characterization and Phytoremediation Using
Water Hyacinth (Eichorrnia crassipes) in Pulau
Burung, Malaysia. Bioremediation
Journal, 16(1): 9-18.
APHA (2005) Standard Methods for Examination of
Water and Wastewater. 21th ed. American
Public Health Association, Washington, DC,
USA.
Campbell CR, Plank CO (1998). Preparation of plant
tissue for laboratory analysis. P 37-49. In Y.P.
Kalra (ed) Handbook of Reference Method for
Plant Analysis. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
Chakroun HK, Souissi F, Bouchardon JL, Souissi R,
Moutte J, Faure O, Remon E, Abdeljaoued S
(2010). Transfer and accumulation of lead, zinc,
cadmium and copper in plants growing in
abandoned mining-district area. African Journal
of Environmental Science & Technology,
4(10): 651-659
Córdova FC, León AG, Reyes RG, González MG,
Soto E (2011). Response surface methodology
for lead biosorption on Aspergillus terreus. Int J
Environ Sci Tech, 8(4): 695-704.
Dipu S, Kumar AA, Thanga SG (2012). Effect of
Chelating Agents in Phytoremediation of Heavy
Metals. Remediation Journal, 22(2): 133-146.
Esteves BS, Enrich-Prast A, Suzuki MS (2008).
Allometric relations for Typha domingensis
natural populations. Acta Limnol Bras, 20(4):
305-311.
Hu ZH, Yu HQ, Zheng JC (2006). Application of
response surface methodology for optimization
of acidogenesis of cattail by rumen cultures.
Bioresource technology, 97(16): 2103-2109.
Jamil S, Abhilash PC, Singh N, Sharma PN (2009).
Jatropha curcas: A potential crop for
phytoremediation of coal fly ash. J Hazard
Mater, 172: 269-275.
Khider TO, Omer S, Taha O (2012). Alkaline Pulping
of Typha domingensis stems from Sudan.
World Applied Sciences Journal, 16 (3): 331-
336.
Li S, Lissner J, Mendelssohn LA, Brix H, Lorenzen B,
McKee KL, Miao S (2010). Nutrient and
growth responses of cattail (Typha
domingensis) to redox intensity and phosphate
availability. Annals of Botan 105: 175–184.
Mohajeri L, Aziz HA, Zahed MA, Mohajeri S, Kutty
SRM, Isa MH (2011). Response surface
analysis and modeling of n-alkanes removal
through bioremediation of weathered crude
oil. Water Sci Technol 9(63.4): 9.
Mojiri A (2012). Phytoremediation of heavy metals
from municipal wastewater by Typha
domingensis. African Journal of Microbiology
Research, 6(3): 643-647.
Ok YS, Kim JG (2007). Enhancement of Cadmium
Phytoextraction from Contaminated Soils
with Artemisia princeps var. orientalis. Journal
of Applied Sciences, 7(2): 263-268.
International Journal of Scientific Research in Environmental Sciences (IJSRES), 1(4), pp. 63-70, 2013
69
Olguín EJ, Galván GS (2010). Aquatic
phytoremediation: Novel insights in tropical
and subtropical regions. Pure Appl Chem,
82(1): 27-38.
Padmavathiamma PK, Li LY (2007).
Phytoremediation technology: hyper
accumulation metals in plants. Water Air Soil
Pollut, 184: 105-126.
Peer WA, Baxter IR, Richards, EL, Freeman, JL,
Murphy AS (2005). Phytoremediation and
hyperaccumulator plants. The University of
Chicago, The Science Behind Genetically
Modified Organisms, pp: 43.
Setia RC, Kuar N, Setia N, Nayyar H (2008). Heavy
Metal Toxicity in Plants and Phytoremediation.
Crop Improvement: Strategies and
Applications, I.K. International Publishing
House Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi, pp 206-218.
Singh D, Gupta R, Tiwari A (2011). Phytoremediation
of Lead from Wastewater Using Aquatic Plants.
International Journal of Biomedical Research,
2(7): 411‐421.
Tangahu BV, Abdullah SRS, Basri H, Idris M, Anuar
N, Mukhlisin M (2011). A Review on
HeavyMetals (As, Pb, and Hg) Uptake by
Plants through Phytoremediation. International
Journal of Chemical Engineering, Article ID
939161, 31 pages.
Yadav S, Chandra R (2011). Heavy metals
accumulation and ecophysiological effect on
Typha angustifolia L. and Cyperus esculentus
L. growing in distillery and tannery effluent
polluted natural wetland site, Unnao, India.
Environ. Earth Sci, 62: 1235–1243.
Yoon J, Cao X, Zhou Q, Ma LQ (2006).
Accumulation of Pb, Cu, and Zn in native
plants growing on a contaminated Florida site.
Sci Total Environ, 368: 456-464.
Zahed MA, Aziz HA, Mohajeri L, Mohajeri S, Kutty
SRM, Isa MH (2010). Application of statistical
experimental methodology to optimize
bioremediation of n-alkanes in aquatic
environment. J Hazard Mater, 184(1): 350-356.
Mojiri et al.
Phytoremediation of Heavy Metals from Urban Waste Leachate by Southern Cattail (Typha domingensis)
70
Amin Mojiri is a PhD candidate in environmental engineering, School of Civil Engineering, Universiti
Sains Malaysia (USM), Pulau Pinang. He is fellowship holder and research assistant at the School of Civil
Engineering (USM). He is a member of Young Researchers Club, Islamic Azad University, Iran. He is
editor and reviewer of some international journals. His area of specialization is waste management, waste
recycling, wastewater treatment, wastewater recycling, and soil pollutions.
Dr Aziz is a Professor in environmental engineering at the School of Civil Engineering, Universiti Sains
Malaysia. Dr. Aziz received his Ph.D in civil engineering (environmental engineering) from University of
Strathclyde, Scotland in 1992. He has published over 200 refereed articles in professional
journals/proceedings and currently sits as the Editorial Board Member for 8 International journals. Dr
Aziz's research has focused on alleviating problems associated with water pollution issues from industrial
wastewater discharge and solid waste management via landfilling, especially on leachate pollution. He
also interests in biodegradation and bioremediation of oil spills.
Dr. Mohammad Ali Zahed received PhD in Environmnetal Engineering from Universiti Sains MAlasia
(USM). He is editor and reviewer some international journals.
Dr. Shuokr Qarani Aziz is a lecturer in the Civil Engineering Department, College of Engineering,
University of Salahaddin-Erbil, Iraq. He received B.Sc. degree in Civil Engineering and M.Sc. in Sanitary
Engineering from University of Salahaddin-Erbil, Iraq; Ph.D. in Environmental Engineering from
Universiti Sains Malaysia (USM), Malaysia. He is editor and reviewer of some international journals. His
area of specialization is Water Supply Engineering, Wastewater Engineering, Solid Waste Management,
and Noise Pollution.
Professor M. Razip Selamat is at the School of Civil Engineering, Universiti Sains Malaysia. Dr. M.
Razip received his PhD from University of Queensland, Australia.