physiological links of growth stage and nutrient needs-alfalfa

31
Physiological Links of Growth Stage and Nutrient Needs-Alfalfa Kess Berg Brad Joern, Keith Johnson, Sylvie Brouder, Jeff Volenec Department of Agronomy Purdue University Partial Financial Support Provided by The Potash and Phosphate Institute IMC Global Foundation for Agronomic Research PotashCorp

Upload: others

Post on 09-Dec-2021

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Physiological Links of Growth Stage and Nutrient Needs-Alfalfa

Kess BergBrad Joern, Keith Johnson, Sylvie

Brouder, Jeff VolenecDepartment of Agronomy

Purdue UniversityPartial Financial Support Provided byThe Potash and Phosphate Institute

IMC GlobalFoundation for Agronomic Research

PotashCorp

GoalsConfirm that P and K fertilizer enhances alfalfa growth and yieldDetermine how yield components change in response to improved fertilityExamine the link between root physiology and alfalfa performanceDetermine critical tissue nutrient levels

Experimental Details

Fertilizer treatments: 0, 100, 200, 300, 400 kg K/ha/year0, 25, 50, 75 kg P/ha/year Factorial arrangement: 20 treatments½ applied in May; rest in September

Four forage harvests/yearRoots dug in May and December

CountsLab analyses

Conventional Wisdom Regarding the Impact of P and K on Alfalfa

Addition of P and K will improve alfalfa yield by increasing plant persistence, and as stands thin, increased shoots/plant.Alfalfa plants die primarily during the winter.Addition of K (and P?) increases root reserves, which enhances winter hardiness.Critical values of P and K in alfalfa herbage are 2.5 mg P/g and 20 mg K/g.

24

27

30

33

36

0100

200300

400

050

100150D

ry M

atte

r Yie

ld, t

ons/

acre

Pounds K 2O applied/acre

Pounds P2 O

5 applied/acre

Yield 1998-2002

Potassium, kg/ha0 100 200 300 400

Phos

phor

us, k

g/ha

0

25

50

754000 4500 5000 5500 6000

Potassium, kg/ha0 100 200 300 400

Phos

phor

us, k

g/ha

0

25

50

753400 3600 3800 4000 4200 4400 4600

Potassium, kg/ha0 100 200 300 400

Phos

phor

us, k

g/ha

0

25

50

752800 3000 3200 3400 3600 3800

Potassium, kg/ha0 100 200 300 400

Phos

phor

us, k

g/ha

0

25

50

751600 1800 2000 2200 2400 2600 2800

Harvest 1Harvest 2

Harvest 3 Harvest 4

400 K, 0 P

0 K, 75 P 200 K, 50 P

300 K, 0 P

Concentration, % K1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0

Yiel

d, %

of m

axim

um

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

110

Tissue K and Harvest 1 Yield Response

Concentration, % K0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5

Yiel

d, %

of m

axim

um

50

60

70

80

90

100

110

Tissue K and Harvest 4 Yield Response

Phosphorus Critical Value

Phophorus Concentration, mg P/g tissue0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0

Yiel

d, %

of m

axim

um y

ield

20

40

60

80

100

120

How Does P/K Alter Forage Yield?

Yield=plants/area x shoots/plant x mass/shoot

Conventional Wisdom:“Addition of P and K will improve alfalfa yield by

increasing plant persistenceand as stands thin, increased shoots/plant.”

40 shootsper square

foot

Stems/m2

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800

Yiel

d kg

/ha

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

8000

200020012002

40 shoots/ft2

Forage Yield is Not Associated with Stems/Area

Mass/shoot, g0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0

Yiel

d, k

g/ha

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

80001998 y=5500x.84

R2=0.84

1999 y=4897x.56 R2=0.94

2000 y=4230x.78 R2=0.90

2001 y=3430x.37 R2=0.24

2002 y=3531x.62 R2=0.58

Forage Yield is Associated with High Mass/Shoot

Mass/shoot Increases with K and P

Rapid Shoot Initiation After Harvest

200 K, 0 P 300 K, 0 P

200 K, 25 P 400 K, 50 P

Dec-97May-98

Dec-98May-99

Dec-99May-00

Mar-01May-01

Dec-01May-02

Dec-02

Plan

ts p

er m

2

0

100

200

300

400

500

Plant populations decline over summer (May to Dec.) and not over winter (Dec. to May)

"Critical" densityof 4 plants/ft2

May-99Dec.-99

May-00May-01

Dec.-01May-02

Dec.-02

Plan

ts p

er ft

2

0

5

10

15

20

0 P 25 P50 P75 P

Alfalfa Taproot – Crown Complex

Low P and K High P and K

May-00 Mar-01 May-01 Dec-01 May-02 Dec-02

Plan

ts p

er m

2

0

40

80

120

160

200

2400K 0P0K Plus P200K Plus P

Extensive StandLoss

No K Plus P

May-00 Mar-01 May-01 Dec-01 May-02

Roo

t Sug

ar, m

g/g

dry

wt.

0

40

80

120

160

200

2400K 0P0K Plus P200K Plus P

May-00 Mar-01 May-01 Dec-01 May-02

Roo

t Sta

rch,

mg/

g dr

y w

t.

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

3500K 0P0K Plus P200K Plus P

May-00 May-01 Dec-01 May-02

Roo

t Am

ino

Aci

ds, m

g/g

dry

wt.

0.00

0.05

0.10

0.15

0.20

0.25

0.300K 0P0K Plus P200K Plus P

ConclusionsYield Increased With Added P and K

- Seasonal K Response- Enhanced Mass/shoot- No Change in Shoots/area- Decline in Plants/area With P

Critical Tissue P and K Levels- 2.5 mg/g (0.25%) for P (OK)- 15 mg/g (1.5 %) for K (Low)

ConclusionsPlant Persistence

- Plants Die Over Summer- No K Effect- P Enhances Stand Losses- P x K Imbalance Fatal- Low Starch and Amino Acid

Levels in Taproots

Next PhaseLarger Plots

Frequent Summer SamplingDetailed Root Analyses 0K 0P

0K 75P

0K 0P

400K 75P