physiological effects of salicylic acid and thiourea on growth and productivity of maize plants in...
TRANSCRIPT
This article was downloaded by: [University of Chicago]On: 16 March 2013, At: 05:45Publisher: Taylor & FrancisInforma Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House,37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK
Communications in Soil Science and Plant AnalysisPublication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information:http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/lcss20
Physiological Effect of Salicylic Acid and Thiourea onGrowth and Productivity of Maize Plants in Sandy SoilA. A. Amin a , A. A. Abd El-Kader b , Magda A. F. Shalaby a , Fatma A. E. Gharib c , El-Sherbeny M. Rashad a & Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva da Botany Department, National Research Centre, Dokki, Cairo, Egyptb Soils and Water Use Department, National Research Centre, Dokki, Cairo, Egyptc Botany and Microbiology Department, Faculty of Science, Helwan University, Cairo, Egyptd Faculty of Agriculture and Graduate School of Agriculture, Kagawa University, Miki-cho,Ikenobe 2393, Kagawa-Ken, 761-0795, JapanAccepted author version posted online: 22 Jan 2013.
To cite this article: A. A. Amin , A. A. Abd El-Kader , Magda A. F. Shalaby , Fatma A. E. Gharib , El-Sherbeny M. Rashad &Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva (2013): Physiological Effect of Salicylic Acid and Thiourea on Growth and Productivity of MaizePlants in Sandy Soil, Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, DOI:10.1080/00103624.2012.756006
To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00103624.2012.756006
Disclaimer: This is a version of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a serviceto authors and researchers we are providing this version of the accepted manuscript (AM). Copyediting,typesetting, and review of the resulting proof will be undertaken on this manuscript before final publication ofthe Version of Record (VoR). During production and pre-press, errors may be discovered which could affect thecontent, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal relate to this version also.
PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE
Full terms and conditions of use: http://www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and-conditions
This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematicreproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-licensing, systematic supply, or distribution in any form toanyone is expressly forbidden.
The publisher does not give any warranty express or implied or make any representation that the contentswill be complete or accurate or up to date. The accuracy of any instructions, formulae, and drug doses shouldbe independently verified with primary sources. The publisher shall not be liable for any loss, actions, claims,proceedings, demand, or costs or damages whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly inconnection with or arising out of the use of this material.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 1
Physiological Effect of Salicylic Acid and Thiourea 1
on Growth and Productivity of Maize Plants in Sandy 2
Soil 3
A. A. Amin,1 A. A. Abd El-Kader,2 Magda A. F. Shalaby,1 Fatma A. E. Gharib,3 El-Sherbeny M. 4 Rashad,1 and Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva4 5
1 Botany Department, National Research Centre, Dokki, Cairo, Egypt 6
2 Soils and Water Use Department, National Research Centre, Dokki, Cairo, Egypt 7
3 Botany and Microbiology Department, Faculty of Science, Helwan University, Cairo, Egypt 8
4 Faculty of Agriculture and Graduate School of Agriculture, Kagawa University, Miki-cho, 9 Ikenobe 2393, Kagawa-Ken, 761-0795, Japan 10
Address correspondence to El-Sherbeny M. Rashad, Botany Department, National Research 11 Centre, Dokki, Cairo, Egypt; E-mail: [email protected]; or, Jaime A. Teixeira da 12 Silva, Faculty of Agriculture and Graduate School of Agriculture, Kagawa University, Miki-cho, 13 Ikenobe 2393, Kagawa-Ken, 761-0795, Japan; E-mail: [email protected] 14
ABSTRACT 15
This study aimed to investigate the response of vegetative growth, yield and some metabolic 16
constituents of maize grains cv. ‘Single Cross 124’ to a foliar application of salicylic acid (SA; 17
100, 200 and 400 mg L-1) and thiourea (TU; 500, 1000 and 1500 mgL-1), two bioregulators, either 18
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f C
hica
go]
at 0
5:45
16
Mar
ch 2
013
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 2
alone, or in combination. The foliar application of SA and TU alone significantly increased stem 19
diameter, number of leaves/plant, leaf area, total dry weight/plant, leaf area index, net assimilation 20
rate, specific leaf weight, as well as yield (i.e., ear length, ear diameter, number of grains/row, 21
number of rows/ear, 100-grains weight, grain yield/plant, grain yield/fed, harvest index and 22
shelling percentage) by increasing SA or TU concentrations up to 200 and 1500 mg L-1, 23
respectively. Salicylic acid and TU, when applied alone, significantly improved the nutritional 24
value and quality of maize grains by increasing crude protein, total soluble sugars, total free amino 25
acids and total soluble phenols. 26
Keywords: Maize (Zea mays L.), Salicylic acid, SA, Thiourea, TU, Growth characteristics, 27
Photosynthetic pigments, Yield, Biochemical constituents. 28
INTRODUCTION 29
Maize (Zea mays L.) is one of the principal food and forage crops around the world. It is the source 30
of a large number of industrial products and is grown under a wide range of climates (Wang et al., 31
2008). In recent decades, efforts have been made to improve the productivity of low-nutrient soils. 32
Inorganic fertilizers contain not only major elements necessary for plant growth, but also 33
anthropogenic sources of soil contamination with heavy metals (Sabiha-Javied et al., 2009). Maize 34
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f C
hica
go]
at 0
5:45
16
Mar
ch 2
013
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 3
plants are sometimes exposed to drought at different periods of growth. Super absorbent hydrogels 35
resist drought, improve soil quality (Woodhouse and Johnson, 1991), and assist with 36
environmental cleanup by reducing metal phytotoxicity by binding metals into non-toxic forms 37
(Ghanshyam and Swati, 2002). 38
Salicylic acid (SA) is a phenolic compound that occurs naturally in plants at very low 39
concentrations. Phenolics participate to some extent in auxin metabolism by regulating 40
indoleacetic acid (IAA) degradation or by controlling the formation of IAA conjugates in faba 41
bean (Vicia faba L.) and maize (Zea mays L.) (El-Mergawi and Abdel-Wahed, 2007). The 42
sustained level of SA may be a prerequisite for the synthesis of auxin and/or cytokinin, as shown 43
for mustard (Brassica juncea L.) (Syeed et al. 2010). Salicylic acid is a common plant-produced 44
signal molecule responsible for inducing resistance to a number of biotic and abiotic stresses, for 45
example soybean (Glycine max L.) (Karlidag et al., 2009; Syeed and Khan, 2010) and activates the 46
defense system in grapevine berry (Vitis vinifera L. cv. ‘Chardonnay’) (Bao et al., 2009). Salicylic 47
acid participates in the regulation of stomatal closure, nutrient uptake, chlorophyll and protein 48
synthesis, inhibition of ethylene biosynthesis, transpiration, and photosynthesis [e.g., in wheat 49
(Triticum aestivum L.) seedlings (Shakirova et al., 2003) and grapevine leaves (Wang et al., 50
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f C
hica
go]
at 0
5:45
16
Mar
ch 2
013
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 4
2010)]. Salicylic acid induces flowering, increase flower life, retards senescence and increases cell 51
metabolic rate. Salicylic acid treatments at 0.5 mM strongly or completely suppressed the 52
cadmium (Cd)-induced up-regulation of antioxidant enzyme activities in barley (Hordeum 53
vulgare) seedlings (Metwally et al., 2003). 54
Thiourea (TU) has been identified as an effective bioregulator imparting stress tolerance to 55
crops. It imparted salinity tolerance to Brassica juncea under field conditions (Srivastava et al., 56
2009). Thiourea plays several bioregulatory roles in crop plants, as the sulfhydryl group has 57
diverse biological activities (Jocelyn, 1972). It is involved in the phloem transport of sucrose and 58
in the substrate binding site of the amino acid carrier (McCormick and Johnstone, 1990). Thiourea 59
enhances the formation of the ternary complex, sucrose H+ carrier, thus improving translocation of 60
photosynthates while increasing the photosynthetically active leaf surface during grain filling in 61
cereals and stimulating dark fixation of carbon dioxide (CO2) in chickpea (Cicer arietinum) 62
embryos (Hernández et al., 1983). 63
The potent impact of SA and TU on various areas of plant structure and function has prompted 64
many investigators to apply them to several crop plants aiming to control growth patterns and 65
development coupled with enhanced systemic resistance to various harmful agents. Salicylic acid 66
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f C
hica
go]
at 0
5:45
16
Mar
ch 2
013
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 5
promotes some physiological processes and inhibits others depending on its concentration, plant 67
species, developmental stage and environmental conditions (e.g., on tomato (Lycopersicon 68
esculentum Mill. cv. ‘Sun Bright’) plants (Ding and Wang, 2003; Mateo et al., 2006). In faba bean, 69
SA at 1-5 mM increased growth criteria, but application of 3-5 mM SA reduced growth in maize 70
plants (El-Mergawi and Abdel-Wahed, 2007). Salicylic acid increased the number of flowers, 71
pods/plant and seed yield of soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr. cv. ‘Cajeme’] plants 72
(Gutierrez-Coronado et al., 1998) and enhanced the growth of wheat (Shakirova et al., 2003), 73
yellow maize (Abdel-Wahed et al., 2006) and both faba bean and maize (El-Mergawi and 74
Abdel-Wahed, 2007). In contrast, SA at relatively high doses inhibited plant growth and 75
chlorophyll content of lupine (Lupinus termis L.) (Haroun et al 1998) and wheat plants (Iqbal and 76
Ashraf, 2006). Moreover, TU significantly increased vegetative growth, protein content and yield 77
of maize (Sahu et al., 1993), onion (Allium cepa L.) (Abdul Hye et al., 2002), mustard (Sahu et al., 78
2005), clusterbean [Cyamopsis tetragonaloba (L.) Taub] (Garg et al., 2006), and wheat (Anjum, 79
2008). 80
Thus SA and TU are expected to influence the growth and yield of maize plants grown in 81
sandy soil. Therefore, the present investigation was undertaken to study the impact of spraying 82
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f C
hica
go]
at 0
5:45
16
Mar
ch 2
013
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 6
maize (Zea mays L.) cv. ‘Single Cross 124’ plants with different concentrations of SA and TU, 83
individually or in combination, on some morphological criteria, yield as well as some metabolic 84
constituents of the grains in a bid to find one or more suitable levels that could enhance yield 85
relative to the control. 86
MATERIALS AND METHODS 87
Two field experiments were carried out in sandy soil at El-Saff, Giza Governorate, Egypt during 88
two successive seasons of two successive years. 89
Grains of maize (Zea mays L.) cv. ‘Single Cross 124’ were sown on the 15th June in both 90
seasons and in both years. The soil was sandy in texture with low fertility and poor in nitrogen 91
content. According to the F.A.O. (1970) soil classification, it is a Regosol. The main analytical 92
data of the soil was evaluated using standard methods according Black et al. (1965), and selected 93
soil samples were characterized by pH (7.58), electrical conductivity (EC) (2.2 dS m-1), OM 94
(0.12%), total calcium carbonate (CaCO3; 12.15%) and cation exchange capacity (CEC; 4.31 95
meq/100 mg). The selected soil samples had 88.7% sand, 7.50% silt and 3.80% clay and the 96
texture of the soil was sandy. The soil phosphorus (P), Cd, lead (Pb), and iron (Fe) contents were 97
extracted using the method of Cottenie et al. (1982). Available P, Fe, Pb, and Cd soil analysis 98
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f C
hica
go]
at 0
5:45
16
Mar
ch 2
013
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 7
showed that these values were 10, 28.5, 3.5 and 0.26 mg L-1, respectively. The absorbent material 99
used was a mixture of anionic hydrogel (polyacrylamide K, polyacrylated, 30% anionicity) and 100
cationic hydrogel (polyacrylamide, allylamine hydrochloride gel, 20% cationicity) at a ratio of 2:3. 101
The experimental design was a split plot with four replications. The SA treatment occupied the 102
main plots and TU treatments were allocated at random in sub-plots. The plot area was 10.5 m2 103
(3.0 m × 3.5 m) and consisted of four rows 70 cm apart and the hills along rows were 20 cm apart. 104
Calcium super-phosphate (15.5% P2O5) was pre-sown at 100 kg fed-1. to the soil; similarly, 105
nitrogen fertilizer was applied at 120 kg N fed-1. Ammonium nitrate (33.5% N) was applied in two 106
equal doses at 21 and 35 days after sowing. 107
In both seasons, a foliar spray was applied twice to maize plants during vegetative growth (at 108
45 and 60 days from sowing), with SA at 100, 200 and 400 mg L-1 and/or TU at 500, 1000 and 109
1500 mg L-1 (i.e., singly and in combination, in all possible permutations). The interaction of 110
different concentrations of both compounds was also assessed in addition to untreated plants 111
(control). 112
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f C
hica
go]
at 0
5:45
16
Mar
ch 2
013
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 8
Plant growth characters measured at silky (75 days after sowing (DAS)) and milky (90 DAS) 113
stages (i.e., green yield) were: plant height (PH), stem diameter (SD), leaf number (LN), dry 114
weight/plant (DW), leaf area (cm2 plant-1) (LA) according to Bremner and Taha (1966), leaf area 115
index (LAI) according to Watson (1952), specific leaf weight (SLW) (mg cm-2) according to 116
Pearce et al. (1969), crop growth rate (CGR) (mg/cm2/days) according to Abdel-Gawad et al. 117
(1980) and net assimilation rate (NAR) (mg/cm2/day) as given by Watson (1958) 15 days after 118
each spray. The photosynthetic pigment [chlorophylls (Chl) a and b, carotenoids as well as total 119
pigments] content of fresh leaves was also determined (Saric et al., 1967) at both silky and milky 120
stages. 121
At the time of harvest (105 DAS), the mean values of yield and its related parameters, i.e., ear 122
length (EL), ear diameter (ED), row number (RN), grain number (GN), 100-grain weight 123
(100-GW), grain yield/plant (GY/P), grain yield/fed. (GY/F), harvest index (HI) and shelling 124
percentage (SHP) were determined. Grains were harvested from each treatment to determine the 125
fresh weight of grains (GFW) and percentage oil (PO) by a Soxhlet apparatus according to 126
A.O.A.C. (1975). Representative plant samples were taken from each treatment and dried in an 127
electric oven with a drift fan at 70°C for 48 h until constant dry weight was achieved. Dry samples 128
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f C
hica
go]
at 0
5:45
16
Mar
ch 2
013
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 9
of leaves and grains were used to determine total soluble sugars (TSS) and total carbohydrate in 129
grains (GTC) (Dubois et al., 1956). Crude protein percentage (CPP) was calculated by multiplying 130
the values of total nitrogen by 6.25 (A.O.A.C, 1988). Total phenols (TPH) were determined 131
according to Diaz and Martin (1972). The method of Plummer (1978) was used to estimate total 132
free amino acids. 133
Data for both growing seasons was carried out according to Snedecor and Cochran (1990). 134
Data was combined since the CV% for each season’s data was < 5%. Data was analyzed by 135
ANOVA, and treatment means were compared using Fisher’s least significant difference (LSD) at 136
α = 0.05. 137
RESULTS 138
Growth Parameters 139
Data presented in Tables 1, 2, and 3 show that foliar application of SA either separately at 100, 200 140
and 400 mg L-1 and TU at 500, 1000 and 1500 mg L-1 or any of their combinations, promoted 141
almost all growth criteria compared to corresponding untreated control plants (i.e., neither treated 142
with SA or TU). In all cases, the increments in growth parameters were often highly significant in 143
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f C
hica
go]
at 0
5:45
16
Mar
ch 2
013
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 10
comparison with untreated control plants. The most effective treatments on total dry weight/plant 144
were the combination of SA at 200 mg L-1 + TU at 1500 mg L-1 followed by TU alone at 1500 mg 145
L-1 for all growth parameters. 146
Foliar application of SA up to 200 mg L-1 significantly increased SD, LN, 4th LA, DW, LAI, 147
NAR and SLW compared to corresponding untreated control plants. 148
Furthermore, TU was more effective than SA in increasing vegetative growth of maize plants 149
at the two stages of growth (Tables 1 and 2). The increment in growth characters (i.e., PH, LN, 4th 150
LA, DW, LAI, NAR, and SLW was maximum with 1500 mg L-1 TU while Ln and CGR showed an 151
insignificant response compared to control plants at 90 DAS. 152
Regarding the combined effect of SA and TU on vegetative growth, similar significant 153
increases were obtained in some growth parameters using different concentrations of SA and TU. 154
SA at 200 mg L-1 + TU at 1500 mg L-1 enhanced growth parameters the most at the two stages of 155
growth (Table 3). 156
157
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f C
hica
go]
at 0
5:45
16
Mar
ch 2
013
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 11
Yield and Oil Content 158
Data presented in Tables 3 and 4 show that the application of SA increased maize yield (i.e., EL, 159
ED, RN, GN, 100-GW, GY/P, GY/F, HI and SHP) more than control plants. The most promising 160
results were for GY/F (increased 35.74% more than the control) and grain quality by increasing Po 161
(increased 29.32% more than the control) at 200 mg L-1 SA. 162
TU alone significantly increased maize yield and oil content. TU at 1500 mg L-1 increased 163
GY/F (increased 47.354% more than the control) while Po increased 26.35% more than the control 164
with 200 mg L-1 SA (Table 4). In all cases, the increments in maize yield and oil quality were often 165
highly significant in comparison with untreated controls. 166
Furthermore, maize yield was far more sensitive to the interaction between SA and TU. The 167
highest increase in maize yield (100-Gw, GY/P and SHP increased 18.30, 16.27 and 21.24% more 168
than their controls, respectively) were obtained by foliar application of 200 mg L-1 SA + 1500 mg 169
L-1 TU followed by 200 mg L-1 SA + 1000 mg L-1 TU for all parameters (Table 3). 170
171
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f C
hica
go]
at 0
5:45
16
Mar
ch 2
013
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 12
Photosynthetic Pigments 172
Data presented in Tables 5 and 6 show that Chl a and b, carotenoids and TPP in the leaves of maize 173
plants reached a maximum value at 90 DAS. Generally, foliar application of either SA or TU at 174
any concentration or their combination significantly increased the Chl a and b, carotenoids and 175
consequently the TPC more than controls at 75 and 90 DAS. The most effective concentrations 176
were 200 and 1500 mg L-1 of either SA or TU, respectively and their combination at the two stages 177
of growth. 178
Foliar spray of maize plants with SA at 100, 200 and 400 mg L-1 significantly increased 179
photosynthetic pigments compared to untreated plants (Table 5). The highest recorded value of 180
Chl a and b, carotenoids and TPP in the leaves of maize plants was obtained with 200 mg L-1 SA at 181
the two stages of growth, while TU up to 1500 mg L-1 also significantly increased these pigments 182
(Table 5). 183
Moreover, the interaction between SA and TU significantly increased Chl a and b, carotenoids and 184
Tpp content in the leaves of maize plants more than controls at the two stages of growth (Table 6), 185
the most effective treatment being SA at 200 mg L-1 + TU at 1500 mg L-1. 186
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f C
hica
go]
at 0
5:45
16
Mar
ch 2
013
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 13
Chemical Constituents 187
Data presented in Table 7 shows that foliar application of either SA or TU at any concentration 188
significantly increased the crude protein %, total carbohydrates in the grains and Tss percent, total 189
free amino acids and TPH contents (mg g-1) in the leaves and grains of maize compared with 190
controls at 105 DAS (i.e., the harvest date). The most effective treatment was 200 and 1500 mg L-1 191
of either SA or TU, respectively. 192
Furthermore, the results obtained indicate that the highest level of TSS, percent total amino acids 193
and phenolic compounds in maize grains was obtained for either 200 mg L-1 SA or 1500 mg L-1 194
TU. 195
DISCUSSION 196
The present study indicates that the application of SA up to 200 mg L-1 and TU up to 1500 mg L-1, 197
individually or in combination, greatly promotes the vegetative growth and dry matter production 198
of maize plants, possibly through participation in the synthesis of auxin and/or cytokinin, 199
enhancement of cell division and Chl accumulation. In lupine seedlings, SA stimulated the growth 200
through direct interference with the enzymatic activities responsible for biosynthesis and/or 201
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f C
hica
go]
at 0
5:45
16
Mar
ch 2
013
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 14
catabolism of growth-promoting and -inhibiting substances (El-Bahy, 2002). Similarly, low 202
concentrations of SA enhanced the growth of soybean (Gutierrez-Coronda et al., 1998), wheat 203
(Iqbal and Ashraf, 2006; Amin et al., 2008b) and maize (El-Mergawi and Abdel-Wahed, 2007), 204
whereas high concentrations inhibited the growth of lupine (Haroun et al., 1998) and wheat (Iqbal 205
and Ashraf, 2006). Thiourea showed, in this study, a much better ability than SA (200 mg L-1) to 206
promote growth and yield of maize. Thiourea increase nitrogen uptake, metabolic processed and 207
hence increased the clusterbean growth and dry matter accumulation (Burman et al., 2004). 208
Thiourea also promoted growth and photosynthetic pigments in maize (Sahu et al., 1993), onion 209
(Abdul Hye et al., 2002), clusterbean (Garg et al., 2006), two sunflower cultivars (Amin et al., 210
2008a) and wheat (Anjum, 2008). Intuitively, the combination of SA and TU more effectively 211
increased vegetative growth, dry matter production and yield of maize plants than single 212
treatments. 213
Maize yield and the quantity of oil was significantly enhanced by SA, especially at 200 mg L-1. SA 214
increased grains production/ plant and/or PO formation and consequently OY/P and OY/F. 215
Salicylic acid may increase the existing polyamine pool and subsequently retard senescence. Rice 216
grain filling, plumpness and 1000-seed weight were positively correlated with polyamine contents 217
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f C
hica
go]
at 0
5:45
16
Mar
ch 2
013
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 15
(Yang et al., 1996). The application SA has been reported to increase growth, essential oil yield 218
and total polyamine content of basil (Ocimum basilicum L.) and marjoram (Majorana hortensis) 219
plants (Gharib, 2006), yield and components of maize (Abdel-Wahed et al., 2006) and wheat 220
plants (Iqbal and Ashraf, 2006; Amin et al., 2008b). According to several authors, there was a 221
correlation between the stimulatory effect due to lower concentration of salicylate compounds on 222
growth and increases in the content and activity levels of endogenous growth and hormones 223
promoters; indole acetic acid, gibberellin and cytokinins compounds and antagonized the growth 224
inhibitory effect of abcisic acid while high concentration had opposite effect inducing growth 225
promoters. It might attribute to the effect on inhibiting growth promoters biosynthesis and/or 226
promoting its destruction or it might be due to the antagonistic of effect with the stimulatory action 227
of promoters through transformation of active forms into inactive forms, such effect led to the 228
hormonal imbalance thus changes in the endogenous growth hormones control and coordinate 229
plant growth: Zaky (1985) on linum, Leslie and Romani (1986) on radish seedlings, and Kord and 230
Hathout (1992) on tomato plants. Thiourea increased yield more effectively than SA by enhancing 231
photosynthetic activity, accumulating dry matter and, consequently, increased translocation and 232
accumulation of certain metabolites in plant organs, which affected their yield and its components 233
(Tables 2, 5, 7). Thiourea significantly increased the yield of maize (Sahu et al., 1993), onion 234
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f C
hica
go]
at 0
5:45
16
Mar
ch 2
013
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 16
(Abdul Hye et al., 2002), clusterbean (Burman et al., 2004; Garg et al., 2006), mustard (Sahu et al., 235
2005), soybean (Jagetiya and Kaur, 2006) and OY/F of two sunflower cultivars (Iqbal and Asharf, 236
2006; Amin et al., 2008a). 237
In this study, the combination of SA at 200 mg L-1+ TU at 1500 mg L-1 was the best treatment to 238
increase the yield of maize plants. 239
Photosynthetic pigments of maize leaves were significantly enhanced by the application of SA or 240
TU and/or their combination (Tables 5, 6). SA and TU might concomitantly increase cell 241
metabolic rate and retard senescence by protecting and preventing chloroplasts from senescing and 242
retarding Chl destruction and/or increase Chl biosynthesis. SA participates in the regulation of 243
stomatal closure, nutrient uptake and Chl synthesis (Khan et al., 2003; Shakirova et al., 2003). SA 244
significantly increased Chl content in wheat (Amin et al., 2008b), maize (El-Mergawi and 245
Abdel-Wahed, 2007), two mustard cultivars (Syeed et al., 2010) and grapevine (Wang et al., 246
2010), whereas SA at 10-3 and 10-4 M negatively affected stomatal index and stomatal density of 247
pepper (Mendoza et al., 2002). Haroun et al. (1998) working on Lupinus termis showed that 248
salicylates at lower concentration (2.5 mM) caused significant increases in Chl content, while a 249
higher concentration (10 mM) inhibited it. The lower concentration enhanced the total 250
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f C
hica
go]
at 0
5:45
16
Mar
ch 2
013
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 17
photosynthetic activity (either photosystem I or II). Thiourea may increase N levels (structural 251
component of Chl) and enhance Chl accumulation, which would lead to a higher rate of 252
photosynthesis. The promotive effects of TU on photosynthetic pigments were observed for 253
clusterbean (Burman et al., 2004) and sunflower (Amin et al., 2008a). Similarly, in this study, the 254
combination of SA at 200 mg/l and TU at 1500 mg L-1 was the treatment that most increased the 255
photosynthetic pigments of maize leaves. 256
A foliar application of either SA or TU increased the CP, TSS, FAA and TPH in the dry grain of 257
maize, possibly due to the bioregulatory effect on enzymatic activity and translocation processes 258
from leaves to grains, linking or converting to other plant metabolites. A low dose of SA (2.5 mM) 259
significantly increased total carbohydrate content in lupine seeds (Haroun et al. 1998) while higher 260
doses (5 and 10 mM) significantly decreased total carbohydrate content in maize grains 261
(Abdel-Wahed et al., 2006). Salicylic acid increased the level of N, proteins and nitrate reductase 262
activity in Phaseolus vulgaris (Sarangthem and Singh, 2003), enhanced nutrient uptake, total free 263
amino acid as well as total polyamine contents in basil and marjoram plants (Gharib, 2006), and 264
enhanced N, P, K uptake and total soluble sugars of wheat grains (Amin et al., 2008b). Increased 265
mineral nutrient content seem to be involved in the mechanism of stress-tolerance and played an 266
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f C
hica
go]
at 0
5:45
16
Mar
ch 2
013
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 18
important role in enhancing the activity of enzymes responsible for drought resistance (Cherki et 267
al., 2002). On the other hand, TU significantly increased the content of total sugar, protein, and 268
total phenolic compounds (Burman et al., 2004; Garg et al., 2006; Anjum, 2008). Thus, combined 269
treatments of SA at 200 mg L-1 and TU at 1500 mg L-1 may be effective for enhancing TS, TFAA 270
and TPH. Salicylic acid typically alleviates the effects of heavy metal stress, for example, as seen 271
with Bromus tomentellus germination and growth under cadmium stress (Saberi et al., 2011), or 272
salt stress, as seen with Artemisia annua L. (Aftab et al., 2011). SA also serves as an enhancer of in 273
vitro organogenesis, in addition to its stress-modulating role (e.g., Malabadi et al., 2008). 274
In conclusion, SA and TU can be easily applied as a foliar application to maize plants in the field. 275
Application of SA at 200 mg L-1 and TU at 1500 mg L-1, singly or in combination, resulted in a 276
significant increase in every morphological attribute, particularly grain yield and quality. The use 277
of SA and TU as bioregulatory compounds thus open up a new avenue for increasing maize yield, 278
improving quality and provides an easy applicable solution to ensure sustainable agriculture in 279
sandy soil, extending the culture of this crop to other arid and semi-arid zones around the world. 280
281
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f C
hica
go]
at 0
5:45
16
Mar
ch 2
013
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 19
REFERENCES 282
Abdel-Gawad, A.A.; K.A., El-Shouny, S.A. Saleh and M.A. Ahmed (1980). The relation between 283
the efficiency of leaf surface and the growth of some wheat cultivars in Egyptian Research Bulletin 284
1412: 1-17. 285
Abdel-Wahed, M.S.A.; A.A. Amin and S.M El-.Rashad (2006). Physiological effect of some 286
bioregulators on vegetative growth, yield and chemical constituents of yellow maize plants. World 287
Journal of Agricultural Sciences 2 (2): 149-155. 288
Abdul Hye, M.D.; M.D.S. Haque and M. Abdul Karim (2002). Influence of growth regulator and 289
their time of application on yield of onion. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences 5:1021-1023. 290
Aftab, T.; M.M.A. Khan; J.A. Teixeira da Silva; M. Idrees and M. Naeem (2011). Role of salicylic 291
acid in promoting salt stress tolerance and enhanced artemisinin production in Artemisia annua L. 292
Journal of Plant Growth Regulation 30: 425-435. 293
Amin, A.A., El-Sh. M. Rashad and F.A. Gharib (2008a). Response of two sunflower cultivars to 294
foliar application of morphactin CF125 and thiourea. Egyptian Journal of Applied Agricultural 295
Research 1 (1): 1-19. 296
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f C
hica
go]
at 0
5:45
16
Mar
ch 2
013
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 20
Amin, A.A., El-Sh.M. Rashad and F.A. Gharib (2008b). Changes in morphological, physiological 297
and reproductive characters of wheat plants as affected by foliar application with salicylic acid and 298
ascorbic acid. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences 2 (2): 252-261. 299
Anjum, F. (2008). Use of thiourea for improving (Triticum aestivum L.) under contrasting 300
environmental conditions Ph. D. Thesis. Botany Department, University of Agriculture, 301
Faisalabad, Pakistan. 302
A. O. A. C. (1975). Official Methods of Analysis, 12th Ed. Association of Official Analytical 303
Chemists, Washington, D.C., U.S.A. 304
A. O. A. C. (1988). Official Methods of Analysis, 21st Ed. Association of Official Analytical 305
Chemists, Washington, D.C., U.S.A. 306
Bao, W.S.; L. Tian; T.R. Rong; P.Q. Hong; Z.J. Cheng; W.P. Fei; C.J. Ye; Z. Ping; W. Wei and 307
H.W. Dong (2009). Involvement of phospholipase D in the low temperature acclimation-induced 308
thermotolerance in grape berry. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 47 (6): 504-510. 309
Black, C.A.; D.D. Evans; L.E. Ensminger; J.L. White and F.E. Clark (1965). Methods of Soil 310
Analysis. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI, USA. 311
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f C
hica
go]
at 0
5:45
16
Mar
ch 2
013
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 21
Bremner, P.M. and M.A. Taha (1966). Studies in potato agronomy. The effect of variety, seed size 312
and spacing on growth, development and yield. The Journal of Agricultural Science 66: 241-252. 313
Burman, U.; B.K. Garg and S. Kathju (2004). Interactive effect of thiourea and phosphorus on 314
clusterbean under water stress. Biologia Plantarum, 48: 61-65. 315
Cherki, G., A. Foursy, and K. Fares (2002). Effects of salt stress on growth, inorganic ions and 316
proline accumulation in relation to osmotic adjustment in five sugar beet cultivars. Environmental 317
and Experimental Botany 74: 39-50. 318
Cottenie, A.; M. Verloo; L. Kiekens; G. Velgh and R. Camerlynch (1982). Chemical analysis of 319
plants and soils. Laboratory of Analytical and Agrochemistry, Ghent State University, Ghent 320
Belgium, pp:63. 321
Diaz, H.D. and Martin C.G. (1972). Peach sees dormancy in relation to endogenous inhibitors and 322
applied growth substances. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 17: 323
652-654. 324
Ding, C. and C.Y. Wang (2003). The dual effects of methyl salicylate on ripening and expression 325
for ethylene biosynthetic genes in tomato fruits. Plant Science 164: 589. 326
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f C
hica
go]
at 0
5:45
16
Mar
ch 2
013
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 22
Dubois, M.; K.A. Gilles, J. R. Hamilton, P.A. Robers and F. Smith (1956). Colorimetric method 327
for determination of sugar and related substances. Annals of Chemistry 28: 350-356. 328
El-Bahy, M.M. (2002). Metabolic changes, phytohormonal level and activities of certain related 329
enzymes associated with growth of presoaked lupine seeds in salicylic and gallic acid. Bulletin of 330
the Faculty of Science, Assuit University, Egypt 31(2): 259-270. 331
El-Mergawi, R and M. Abdel-Wahed (2007). Diversity in salicylic acid effects on growth criteria 332
and different indole acetic acid forms among faba bean and maize. International Plant Growth 333
Substances Association. 19th Annual meeting, Puerto Vallarta, Mexico, July 21-25, 2007. 334
F.A.O. (1970). Guidelines to soil description. FAO: Rome, Italy. 335
Garg, B.K., U. Burman and S. Kathja (2006). Influence of thiourea on photosynthesis, nitrogen 336
metabolism and yield of clusterbean (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba L. Taub.) under rain fed 337
conditions of Indian arid zone. Plant Growth Regulation 48: 237-245. 338
Ghanshyam, S.C. and M. Swati, (2002). Use of novel hydrogels based on modified cellulosics and 339
methacrylamide for separation of metal ions from water systems. Journal of Applied Polymer 340
Science 86 (3): 667-671. 341
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f C
hica
go]
at 0
5:45
16
Mar
ch 2
013
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 23
Gharib, F.A. (2006). Effect of salicylic acid on the growth, metabolic activities and oil content of 342
basil and marjoram. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology 8 (4): 485-492. 343
Gutierrez-Coronado, M.A.; C. Trejo-Lopez and A. Sharque-Saavedra (1998). Effect of salicylic 344
acid on the growth of roots and shoots in soybean. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 36 (8): 563. 345
Haroun, S.A.; H.S Aldesuqy; W.M. Shukry and A.M. Gaber (1998). Regulation of growth and 346
metabolism in Lupinus termis plant by sodium salicylate. Egyptian Journal of Physiological 347
Sciences 22:75. 348
Hernández, N.; J. Aldasoro; D. Rodríguez; A. Matilla, and G. Nicolas (1983). Effect of thiourea on 349
the ionic content and dark fixation of CO2 in embryonic axes of Cicer arietinum seeds. 350
Physiologia Plantarum 57: 273-278. 351
Iqbal, M. and M. Ashraf (2006). Wheat seed priming in relation to salt tolerance, growth, yield and 352
level of free salicylic acid and polyamines. Annales Botanici Fennici 43 (4): 250-259. 353
Jagetiya, B.L. and M.J. Kaur. (2006). Role of thiourea in improving productivity of soybean. 354
International Journal of Plant Science 1 (2): 308-310. 355
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f C
hica
go]
at 0
5:45
16
Mar
ch 2
013
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 24
Jocelyn, P.C. (1972). Biochemistry of the SH group: the occurrence, chemical properties, 356
metabolism and biological function of thiols and disulphides. Academic Press: London. pp. 357
57-122. 358
Karlidag, H.; Yildirim, E. and M. Turan (2009). Exogenous applications of salicylic acid affect 359
quality and yield of strawberry grown under antifrost heated greenhouse conditions. Journal of 360
Plant Nutrition and Soil Science 172 (2): 270-276. 361
Khan, W.; B. Prithiviraj and D.L. Smith (2003). Photosynthetic response of corn and soybean to 362
foliar application of salicylates. Journal of Plant Physiology 160: 485. 363
Kord M., Hathout T. (1992): Changes in some growth criteria metabolic activates and endogenous 364
hormones in tomato plants consequent to spraying with different concentration of salicylaldehyde. 365
Egyptian Journal of Physiological Sciences 1-2: 117-139. 366
Leslie G.A., Romani R.J. (1986): Salicylic acid a new inhibitor of ethylene biosynthesis. Plant 367
Cell Reports 5, 144. 368
Malabadi, R.B.; J.A. Teixeira da Silva and K. Nataraja (2008). Salicylic acid as a signaling 369
molecule during cloning of mature trees of Pinus roxburghii (Chir pine) using TCL technology. 370
Tree and Forestry Science and Biotechnology 2 (1): 34-39. 371
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f C
hica
go]
at 0
5:45
16
Mar
ch 2
013
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 25
Mateo, A.F.D.; P. Muhlenbock; B. Kular; P.M. Mullineaux and S. Karpinski (2006). Controlled 372
levels of salicylic acid are required for optimal photosynthesis and redox homeostasis. Journal of 373
Experimental Botany 57 (8): 1795-1807. 374
McCormick, J. and R.M. Johnstone (1990). Evidence for an essential sulfhydryl group at the 375
substrate binding site of the A. system transport of Ehrlich cell plasma membranes. Biochemistry 376
and Cell Biology 68: 512-519. 377
Mendoza, A.B.; F.R Godina; V.R. Torres; H.R. Rodríguez and R.K. Maiti, (2002). Chilli seed 378
treatment with salicylic and sulfosalicylic acid modifies seedling epidermal anatomy and cold 379
stress tolerance. Crop Research 24: 19-25. 380
Metwally, A.; I. Finkemeier; M. Georgi and K. Dietz (2003). Salicylic acid alleviates the cadmium 381
toxicity in barley seedlings. Plant Physiology 132: 272-281. 382
Pearce, R.B.; G.E. Carlson, D.K. Barnes; R.H. Host and C.H. Hasson (1969). Specific leaf weight 383
and photosynthesis in alfalfa. Crop Science 9: 423-426. 384
Plummer, D. T. (1978). An Introduction to practical Biochemistry. 2nd Ed p. 144. 385
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f C
hica
go]
at 0
5:45
16
Mar
ch 2
013
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 26
Saberi, M.; A. Shariari; J.A. Teixeira da Silva; F. Tarnian and A. Tavili (2011). Influence of 386
salicylic acid on Bromus tomentellus germination and initial growth properties under cadmium 387
stress. Plant Stress 5 (1): Global Science Books. 388
Sabiha-Javied, T.; M.M. Mehmood; M Chaudhry; M. Tufail, and N. Irfan (2009). Heavy metal 389
pollution from phosphate rock used for the production of fertilizer in Pakistan. Microchemical 390
Journal 91: 94-99. 391
Sahu, M.P., N.S. Solanki, and L.N. Dashora (1993). Effects of thiourea, thiamine and ascorbic acid 392
on growth and yield of maize (Zea mays L.). Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 171: 65-69. 393
Sahu, M.P., SM. Kumawat; S.F. D'Souza; N.K. Ramaswamy and G. Singh (2005). Sulphydryl 394
bioregulator technology for increasing mustard production. Research Bulletin RAU-BARC: 1-52. 395
Sarangthem, K. and T.H.N. Singh (2003). Efficacy of salicylic acid on growth, nitrogen 396
metabolism and flowering of Phaseolus vulgaris. Crop Research 26: 355-360. 397
Saric, M.; R. Katrori; R. Curic; T. Cupina and I. Gric (1967). Chlorophyll Determination. 398
Univerzitet U. Noveon Sadu praktikum iz fiziologize Biljaka-beograd, Hauena Anjiga, p. 215. 399
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f C
hica
go]
at 0
5:45
16
Mar
ch 2
013
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 27
Shakirova, F.M.; A.R. Sakhabutdinova; M.V. Bezrukova; R.A. Fathkutdinova and D.R. 400
Fatkhutdinova (2003). Changes in the hormonal status of wheat seedlings induced by salicylic acid 401
and salinity. Plant Science 164: 317. 402
Snedecor, G.W. and W.G. Cochran (1990). Statistical Methods. 8th Ed. Iowa State Univ. Press 403
Ames, Iowa, U.S.A. p. 609. 404
Srivastava, A.K.; N.K. Ramaswamy; R. Mukopadhyaya; M. G. Chiramal Jincy and S.F. D'Souza 405
(2009). Thiourea modulates the expression and activity profile of mtATPase under salinity stress 406
in seeds of Brassica juncea. Annals of Botany 103 (3): 403-410. 407
Syeed, S.; N.A. Anjum; R. Nazar; N. Iqbal; A. Masood and N.A. Khan (2010). Salicylic 408
acid-mediated changes in photosynthesis, nutrients content and antioxidant metabolism in two 409
mustard (Brassica juncea L.) cultivars in salt tolerance. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum 10: 1007. 410
Syeed, S.; N.A. Khan (2010). Physiological aspects of salicylic acid-mediated salinity tolerance in 411
plants. In: Anjum NA (Ed) Plant Nutrition and Abiotic Stress Tolerance I. Plant Stress 4 (Special 412
Issue 1), 39-46 413
Wang, C.; Yang A; H. Yin and J. Zhang (2008). Influence of water stress on endogenous hormone 414
contents and cell damage of maize seedlings. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology 50 (4): 427-434. 415
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f C
hica
go]
at 0
5:45
16
Mar
ch 2
013
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 28
Wang, L.; I. Fan; W. Loescher; W. Duan; G.J. Liu and J.Z. Cheng (2010). Salicylic acid alleviates 416
decreases in photosynthesis under heat stress and accelerates recovery in grapevine leaves. BMC 417
Plant Biology 10: 34 418
Watson, D.J. (1952). The physiological basis of variation in yield. Advanced Agronomy 4: 419
101-145. 420
Watson, D.J. (1958). The dependence of net assimilation rate on leaf area index. Ann Bot. N. S. 22 421
(85): 37-54. 422
Woodhouse, J. and M.S. Johnson (1991). Effect of super absorbent polymers on survival and 423
growth of crop seedlings. Agricultural Water Management 20 (1): 63-70. 424
Yang, J.; Zhu, Q.; Wang, Z. and X. Cao (1996). Polyamines in developing rice grains their 425
relations with grain filling. Chinese Rice Research Newsletter, 4: 4. 426
Zaky M.L. (1985). Effect of certain chemicals on the physiology of Linum usiatissimum plant. 427
Ph.D. Thesis, Ain Shams University, Faculty of Science, Botany Department, Cairo, Egypt 428
429
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f C
hica
go]
at 0
5:45
16
Mar
ch 2
013
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 29
Table 1. Effect of salicylic acid and thiourea on growth characters of maize plants at (A) 75 and 430 (B) 90 days from sowing (combined analysis of two seasons). 431
432
Growth characters
Treatments (mg L-1)
Total dry
weight (g)
plant-1
4th leaf area
(cm2 )
Number of
leaves
plant-1
Stem
diameter
(cm)
Plant height
(cm)
B A B A B A B A B A
279.0
1
189.0
8
401.2
6
369.1
0
15.7
2
15.0
1
1.9
4
1.6
6
269.8
1
176.0
1
0.0
Salic
ylic
acid
297.1
7
209.6
8
489.6
2
445.2
9
16.9
0
16.2
1
2.2
2
1.7
8
279.2
7
181.1
6
100
333.3239.2496.4466.316.916.42.41.8264.3174.2200
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f C
hica
go]
at 0
5:45
16
Mar
ch 2
013
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 30
4 5 4 8 7 7 1 6 5 5
319.2
6
212.4
9
446.8
0
406.4
7
15.8
9
15.7
0
2.3
6
1.8
1
258.4
6
165.3
4
400
17.09 20.01 41.54 37.08 N.S. 0.66
0.2
8
0.1
1
5.31 1.80 L.S.D. at 5%
282.4
2
190.5
9
413.0
1
376.2
8
15.8
7
15.4
5
1.8
6
1.5
9
266.6
8
177.4
5
0.0
Thio
urea
301.1
5
223.3
0
499.2
9
469.6
1
16.9
8
16.3
6
1.9
9
1.7
2
281.4
9
189.3
6
500
329.6
0
230.1
2
506.3
0
480.4
8
17.3
3
16.6
2
2.1
1
1.7
8
290.2
0
196.2
7
100
0
356.7246.2522.4492.217.617.12.21.8296.9199.1150
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f C
hica
go]
at 0
5:45
16
Mar
ch 2
013
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 31
6 8 1 3 0 1 9 0 1 8 0
19.02 31.80 67.80 49.33 N.S. 0.80
0.1
3
0.1
2
13.81 10.90 L.S.D. at 5%
433
434
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f C
hica
go]
at 0
5:45
16
Mar
ch 2
013
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 32
Table 2. Effect of salicylic acid and thiourea on growth characters of maize plants at (A) 75, (B) 90 435 and (C) 105 days from sowing (combined analysis of two seasons). 436
437
Growth characters
Treatments (mg L-1)
Specific leaf
weight
(mg/cm2/day)
Net assimilation
rate
(mg/cm2/day)
Leaf area
index (LAI)
Crop growth
rate
(mg/cm2/day)
B A B - C A - B B A B - C A - B
5.67 5.38 4.82 4.67 4.68 3.31 5.44 5.52 0.0
Salic
ylic
acid
6.48 5.60 5.69 6.03 5.62 4.49 5.82 6.61 100
6.84 6.72 5.77 6.44 5.76 4.62 5.93 6.70 200
6.79 6.34 5.37 5.86 5.59 4.40 5.71 5.89 400
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f C
hica
go]
at 0
5:45
16
Mar
ch 2
013
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 33
0.69 0.21 0.44 1.15 0.82 1.01 n.s. n.s. L.S.D. at 5%
5.74 5.56 4.90 4.78 4.70 3.48 5.38 5.60 0.0
Thio
urea
7.44 6.60 5.62 5.90 5.84 4.69 6.10 6.47 500
7.54 7.32 5.84 6.11 5.89 5.76 6.22 6.62 1000
8.36 7.68 5.89 6. 54 5.96 5.82 6.34 7.08 1500
1.67 1.02 0.64 1.10 1.11 1.16 n.s. n.s. L.S.D. at 5%
A : Silky stage (at 75 days from sowing)
B : Milky stage (at 90 days from sowing)
C : Ripe stage (at 105 days from sowing)
438
439
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f C
hica
go]
at 0
5:45
16
Mar
ch 2
013
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 34
Table 3. Effect of interaction between salicylic acid and thiourea on growth characters and yield 440 of maize plants at (A) 75, (B) 90 and (C) 105 days from sowing (combined analysis of two 441 seasons). 442
443
Yield of maize plants Growth characters of maize plants
Treatments
(mg L-1) Shelli
ng %
Grai
n
yield
(g)
plant
-1
100
grain
s
weig
ht (g)
Total dry
weight (g)
plant-1
4th leaf area
(cm2 )
Stem
diameter
(cm)
Plant height
(cm)
C C C B A B A B A B A
salicyl
ic acid
Thiour
ea
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f C
hica
go]
at 0
5:45
16
Mar
ch 2
013
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 35
72.31
239.
61
38.8
0
256.
67
189.
70
401.
81
351.
61
1.6
6
1.5
2
259.
11
180.
26
0.0
0.0
76.21
262.
32
39.7
1
278.
58
196.
61
432.
72
360.
30
1.7
9
1.6
7
270.
33
190.
64
100
80.49
271.
84
43.5
4
301.
30
211.
33
469.
45
379.
49
2.2
3
1.7
7
266.
67
187.
45
200
79.30
268.
93
41.6
2
290.
49
199.
42
450.
36
366.
58
2.0
2
1.7
2
264.
56
176.
08
400
76.58
241.
75
39.4
6
267.
21
194.
62
411.
54
359.
21
1.7
2
1.5
9
278.
90
189.
30
0.0
500
80.67
264.
60
41.3
8
296.
12
198.
11
447.
63
376.
39
1.8
0
1.6
9
282.
10
196.
21
100
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f C
hica
go]
at 0
5:45
16
Mar
ch 2
013
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 36
85.82
272.
58
44.6
0
332.
91
230.
97
468.
81
389.
20
2.2
9
1.7
6
270.
40
190.
23
200
82.76
269.
67
42.2
9
312.
06
221.
60
459.
72
380.
61
2.1
2
1.7
0
269.
50
183.
36
400
79.90
244.
49
40.2
1
272.
80
196.
88
426.
90
364.
48
1.7
6
1.5
3
280.
68
194.
47
0.0
1000
81.13
269.
30
42.3
3
337.
70
229.
79
458.
10
378.
75
2.0
5
1.6
6
287.
59
198.
60
100
87.58
276.
51
45.5
5
356.
50
249.
51
472.
26
389.
66
2.3
3
1.8
0
274.
41
191.
23
200
84.60
271.
19
43.6
4
350.
60
238.
60
460.
70
386.
57
2.1
9
1.7
8
270.
13
187.
24
400
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f C
hica
go]
at 0
5:45
16
Mar
ch 2
013
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 37
80.30
248.
33
40.6
6
296.
40
201.
42
433.
30
369.
84
1.7
9
1.5
5
284.
45
196.
63
0.0
1500
82.49
271.
42
42.7
0
339.
30
219.
33
466.
79
372.
11
2.1
6
1.7
1
289.
70
201.
38
100
87.67
278.
60
45.9
0
366.
10
261.
71
482.
61
390.
32
2.3
8
1.8
2
279.
49
194.
63
200
86.21
274.
26
43.8
8
359.
20
244.
52
478.
58
388.
39
2.2
9
1.7
8
276.
31
192.
52
400
4.22 5.71 0.56 9.54 4.88 9.69 7.64
0.1
3
0.0
2
5.34 3.91 L.S.D. at 5%
A : Silky stage (after 75 days from sowing)
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f C
hica
go]
at 0
5:45
16
Mar
ch 2
013
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 38
B : Milky stage (after 90 days from sowing)
C : Ripe stage (after 105 days from sowing)
444
445
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f C
hica
go]
at 0
5:45
16
Mar
ch 2
013
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 39
Table 4. Effect of salicylic acid and thiourea on yield of maize plants at 105 days from sowing 446 (combined analysis of two seasons). 447
448
Yield of maize plants
Treatments (mg L-1) Oi
l %
Shelli
ng %
Harv
est
index
Grain
yield/f
ed.
(ton)
Grain
yield/pl
ant (g)
100
grai
ns
weig
ht
(g)
No.
grai
ns
/ro
w
No.
row
s
/ear
Ear
diame
ter
(cm)
Ear
leng
th
(cm
)
4.9
8
72.54 0.59 3.33 243.80
38.8
0
41.
99
13.
66
1.59
22.3
0
0.0
Salic
ylic
acid
5.7
4
79.36 0.70 3.92 268.36
40.7
8
42.
30
14.
36
2.62
23.6
9
10
0
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f C
hica
go]
at 0
5:45
16
Mar
ch 2
013
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 40
6.4
4
82.37 0.76 4.52 279.22
43.7
2
43.
81
14.
51
2.89
24.7
8
20
0
5.9
0
80.42 0.72 4.11 274.64
42.6
4
43.
62
14.
42
2.76
23.8
7
40
0
0.6
7
5.76 0.11 0.49 24.06 1.93 n.s. n.s. 1.01 0.34 L.S.D. at 5%
5.0
1
73.06 0.60 3.40 244.40
39.3
7
41.
52
13.
80
1.66
22.9
1
0.0
Thio
urea
5.8
7
80.55 0.74 4.09 270.32
41.6
0
43.
69
14.
58
2.56
23.0
9
50
0
6.0
6
83.64 0.76 4.40 276.26
43.5
6
44.
48
16.
69
2.67
24.1
6
10
00
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f C
hica
go]
at 0
5:45
16
Mar
ch 2
013
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 41
6.3
3
86.30 0.79 5.01 281.01
44.5
2
44.
76
16.
70
2.77
24.2
3
15
00
0.7
7
6.62 0.13 0.59 25.55 2.20 n.s. n.s. 0.80 0.17 L.S.D. at 5%
449
450
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f C
hica
go]
at 0
5:45
16
Mar
ch 2
013
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 42
Table 5. Effect of salicylic acid and thiourea on photosynthetic pigments contents (mg/g fresh 451 weight) in the leaves of maize plants at 75 and 90 days from sowing (combined analysis of two 452 seasons). 453
454
Milky stage (90 days after
sowing)
Silky stage (75 days after
sowing)
Treatments (mg L-1) Total
pigmen
ts
Carotenoi
ds
Chl
. b
Chl
. a
Total
pigmen
ts
Carotenoi
ds
Chl
. b
Chl
. a
2.42 0.52
0.4
1
1.4
9
2.17 0.42
0.3
6
1.3
9
0.0
Salic
ylic
acid
2.68 0.61
0.4
8
1.5
9
2.40 0.48
0.4
2
1.5
0
100
3.02 0.70 0.61.72.79 0.58 0.51.6200
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f C
hica
go]
at 0
5:45
16
Mar
ch 2
013
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 43
0 2 2 9
2.87 0.66
0.5
4
1.6
7
2.63 0.52
0.4
9
1.6
2
400
0.12 0.08
0.0
6
0.1
0
0.09 0.04
0.0
5
0.0
9
L.S.D. at 5%
2.44 0.50
0.4
3
1.5
1
2.18 0.43
0.3
5
1.4
0
0.0
Thio
urea
2.75 0.59
0.5
3
1.6
3
2.53 0.49
0.4
8
1.5
6
500
2.95 0.68
0.6
0
1.6
7
2.73 0.56
0.5
3
1.6
4
100
0
3.10 0.72 0.61.72.88 0.59 0.51.7150
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f C
hica
go]
at 0
5:45
16
Mar
ch 2
013
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 44
8 0 7 2 0
0.13 0.09
0.0
9
0.1
1
0.15 0.05
0.1
2
0.1
4
L.S.D. at 5%
455
456
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f C
hica
go]
at 0
5:45
16
Mar
ch 2
013
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 45
Table 6. Effect of interaction between salicylic acid and thiourea on photosynthetic pigments 457 contents (mg/g fresh weight) in the leaves of maize plants at 75 and 90 days from sowing 458 (combined analysis of two seasons). 459
460
Milky stage (90 days after sowing) Silky stage (75 days after sowing)
Treatments (mg
L-1)
Total
pigment
s
Carotenoid
s
Chl.
b
Chl.
a
Total
pigment
s
Carotenoid
s
Chl.
b
Chl.
a
Salicyli
c acid
Thioure
a
2.45 0.54
0.4
2
1.4
9
2.36 0.51
0.3
9
1.4
6
0.0
0.0
2.66 0.56
0.4
6
1.6
4
2.56 0.53
0.4
4
1.5
9
100
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f C
hica
go]
at 0
5:45
16
Mar
ch 2
013
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 46
2.91 0.64
0.5
3
1.7
4
2.81 0.59
0.5
0
1.7
2
200
2.77 0.59
0.4
9
1.6
9
2.69 0.56
0.4
7
1.6
6
400
2.58 0.56
0.4
7
1.5
5
2.48 0.53
0.4
4
1.5
1
0.0
500
2.82 0.60
0.5
1
1.7
1
2.74 0.58
0.4
9
1.6
7
100
3.04 0.67
0.5
6
1.8
1
2.96 0.63
0.5
4
1.7
9
200
2.94 0.65
0.5
3
1.7
6
2.82 0.60
0.5
2
1.7
0
400
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f C
hica
go]
at 0
5:45
16
Mar
ch 2
013
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 47
2.67 0.59
0.4
9
1.5
9
2.58 0.55
0.4
7
1.5
6
0.0
1000
2.96 0.66
0.5
3
1.7
7
2.82 0.59
0.5
1
1.7
2
100
3.13 0.70
0.5
7
1.8
6
3.07 0.67
0.5
6
1.8
4
200
3.04 0.68
0.5
6
1.8
0
2.94 0.64
0.5
3
1.7
7
400
2.79 0.61
0.5
1
1.6
7
2.69 0.58
0.5
0
1.6
1
0.0
1500
3.03 0.68
0.5
4
1.8
1
2.99 0.67
0.5
3
1.7
9
100
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f C
hica
go]
at 0
5:45
16
Mar
ch 2
013
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 48
3.24 0.73
0.6
0
1.9
1
3.17 0.70
0.5
8
1.8
9
200
3.14 0.71
0.5
7
1.8
6
3.06 0.69
0.5
5
1.8
2
400
0.05 0.01
0.0
4
0.0
4
0.06 0.02
0.0
5
0.0
5
L.S.D. at 5%
461
462
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f C
hica
go]
at 0
5:45
16
Mar
ch 2
013
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 49
Table 7. Effect of salicylic acid and thiourea on chemical constituents of maize plants at 105 days 463 from sowing (combined analysis of two seasons). 464
465
Chemical constituents of maize plants
Treatments (mg L-1)
Phenols
(mg/g)
Free amino
acids
Total soluble
sugars %
Total
carbohydra
te
Crude
protei
n %
Grain
s
Leave
s
Grain
s
Leave
s
Grain
s
Leave
s
Grains
Grain
s
4.02 3.81 20.11 19.52 28.09 32.82 75.67 7.69 0.0
Salic
ylic
acid
4.91 5.34 25.41 21.32 31.62 36.71 77.83 8.26 100
5.58 6.51 34.39 26.71 35.28 47.55 80.41 10.44 200
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f C
hica
go]
at 0
5:45
16
Mar
ch 2
013
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 50
3.87 6.40 29.40 24.56 33.46 39.60 79.59 9.39 400
1.01 1.26 5.21 1.44 3.40 4.02 2.01 0.51 L.S.D. at 5%
3.68 2.31 18.90 16.47 22.90 34.40 76.44 7.76 0.0
Thio
urea
4.29 2.72 22.55 17.59 25.61 38.63 78.89 8.39 500
4.30 2.88 26.67 18.36 27.52 43.27 80.01 9.64
100
0
4.36 3.51 32.46 18.93 29.34 50.61 80.39 9.89
150
0
n.s. 0.41 3.43 1.13 3.01 4.20 2.34 0.60 L.S.D. at 5%
466
467
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f C
hica
go]
at 0
5:45
16
Mar
ch 2
013