physics 105 { spring 2011 astrophysics...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Physics 105 { Spring 2011 Astrophysics Singularitiesmkruse/PHY105_S11/projects/Jennifer_Molnar… · was on his Special Theory of Relativity, which described the way space and time](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022070919/5fb8d4857e27df1b1d1d3380/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Physics 105 – Spring 2011Astrophysics
SingularitiesJennifer MolnarApril 25, 2011
1 Abstract
It is possible, given a large enough mass within a small enough volume, for an object to collapse under itsown gravitational weight and form a singularity in space-time. Because gravity warps space-time, an effectdescribed by Einstein’s General Theory of Relativity, there is a distance at which even light will be unable tomove quickly enough to escape the singularity; this distance marks the event horizon. It has been proposed(by Penrose, 1969) that it is impossible for any singularities to exist that are not “clothed” by an eventhorizon—in other words, that all singularities must be black holes. The existence of black holes themselveswas only confirmed relatively recently by such discoveries as the galaxy M87 and the stellar companion toCygnus X-1. Given that black holes exist, the possibility of naked singularities is then considered. Severalmathematical models which suggest that naked singularities may be possible, given conditions where theblack hole has sufficient angular momentum, electrical charge, or a small enough mass.
Contents
1 Abstract 1
2 Introduction 2
3 Conclusion 13
A Bibliography 13
List of Figures
1 Space-time Diagram of the Trajectory of Light . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
2 Light Cones Near a Black Hole . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
3 Proportional Relationship of Gravitational Force and Radius . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
4 Model for Increasing the Rotation of a Black Hole . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
1
![Page 2: Physics 105 { Spring 2011 Astrophysics Singularitiesmkruse/PHY105_S11/projects/Jennifer_Molnar… · was on his Special Theory of Relativity, which described the way space and time](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022070919/5fb8d4857e27df1b1d1d3380/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
2 Introduction
Einstein published two papers on his Theories of Relativity: one in 1905 and the other in 1916. The first
was on his Special Theory of Relativity, which described the way space and time necessarily conform to the
requirement that the speed of light be constant in all inertial frames. The second added a correction to the
first, incorporating the effect of gravity on space, time, and light. This was called the theory of General
Relativity. According to Einstein, gravity can be thought of as a description of the topology of space-time
instead of as a force drawing two objects together. Since the consequences of a curved space-time are difficult
to imagine, a classic analogy is used to illustrate: two pilots are flying their airplanes due north. They start
out a fixed distance apart, moving (presumably) parallel to each other. However, they find themselves
getting inexplicably closer and closer together as they continue to fly north. This, clearly, is not the result
of a mysterious force drawing the two sideways, but a natural consequence of the curvature of the earth.
Similarly, gravity can be considered the natural consequence of the topology of space-time, which is affected
by the distribution of mass and energy. This means that light can be affected by gravity, despite being
composed of photons, which are massless particles.
The curvature of space-time can be conveniently described using four-by-four matrices called tensors,
where each row in the tensor maps the dimension variables into another coordinate system. While relativistic
dimensions are generally introduced in Cartesian coordinates (dx, dy, dz, dt), it is often more convenient to
describe the topology of space-time due to gravitational effects using spherical coordinates (dr, dφ, dθ, dt).
This can be done as follows, using the invariant ds2 as an example:
ds2 = c2dt2 − dx2 − dy2 − dz2 (1)
= c2dt2 − dr2 − r2dθ2 − r2sin2θdφ2 (2)
= −gµνdxµdxν (3)
This equation can be rewritten as
dx′0
dx′1
dx′2
dx′3
= −
−1 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 0 r2 0
0 0 0 r2sin2θ
dx0
dx1
dx2
dx3
(4)
where dx0 = cdt, dx1 = dx, dx2 = dy, dx3 = dz, and dx′0 = cdt, dx′1 = dr, dx′2 = dθ, and dx′3 = dφ.
2
![Page 3: Physics 105 { Spring 2011 Astrophysics Singularitiesmkruse/PHY105_S11/projects/Jennifer_Molnar… · was on his Special Theory of Relativity, which described the way space and time](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022070919/5fb8d4857e27df1b1d1d3380/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
According to Einstein’s field equation, Gij = −8πGc4 Tij . In other words, the Einstein gravitational tensor
(Gij), which is related to the curvature of space, is proportional to the energy/momentum tensor (also
known as the stress/energy tensor, Tij). Although this looks like a simple equation, the many simultaneous
equations hidden within the tensors make it complicated to solve. The simplest case is the case of a large,
spherically symmetrical object with mass M , first solved by Swartzschild in 1915. Since space-time is no
longer flat in the region of the object, the tensor gµν changes somewhat:
gµν =
−(1− 2GMr2 0 0 0
0 (1− 2GMr2 )−1 0 0
0 0 r2 0
0 0 0 r2sin2θ
(5)
This is called the Swartzschild metric, and is actually a very useful case to have a solution for since
celestial bodies with masses significant enough to distort space-time tend to pull themselves into spheres by
their own gravity. (The limits of this formula lie more substantially in the fact that it assumes that the
spherical body is non-rotating—an unrealistic assumption for actual systems. However, it still acts as a
good approximation for slowly rotating bodies, such as the Earth and Sun.) This formula enables not only
spatial distortion, but time distortion due to gravity to be quantified, much like the Lorentz transformation
equations enable the quantification of space-time distortion due to motion.
While light always moves at a constant speed according to Einstein’s Theory of Special Relativity, his
General Theory of Relativity states that the time distortion due to gravity may still be significant enough
to prevent light from escaping from a gravitational field, due to frequency distortion. The mathematical
argument proceeds thusly: If a photon is emitted from our object of mass M , it will have a locally observed
wavelength of λ0 = cdτ , where dτ is the proper time (the time as measured by an observer in the inertial
frame of the object). An observer at a good distance away will find that the space-time curvature is essentially
unaffected by the mass of M and can be treated as flat. His measurement of the time between wavelengths
(dt) will be equal to the proper time multiplied by the first term of the Schwartzschild metric. In other
words,
cdt =
(1− 2GM
c2rs
)−1/2cdτ (6)
λobs =
(1− 2GM
c2rs
)−1/2λ0 (7)
where rs is equal to the radius at the surface of mass M . This shift in wavelength is usually very small, but in
3
![Page 4: Physics 105 { Spring 2011 Astrophysics Singularitiesmkruse/PHY105_S11/projects/Jennifer_Molnar… · was on his Special Theory of Relativity, which described the way space and time](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022070919/5fb8d4857e27df1b1d1d3380/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
extreme cases (where M is very large and rs is very small), the wavelength can be substantially lengthened.
In particular, as rs approaches 2GMc2 , the observed wavelength approaches infinity and the associated energy
(E = hν = hc/λ) drops to zero. In other words, no light from this radius will be visible to an observer,
and any photons emitted from within this radius will not be able to pass this radius. A little more math
shows that the relativistic escape velocity, found by equating the kinetic and potential energy of a particle,
Thus, the Schwarzschild radius (rs = 2GMc2 ) marks the boundary called the “event horizon” of the spherical
object—which, since it cannot emit any light, is known as a black hole.
This effect can be visualized using space-time diagrams. Imagine space as a flat sheet in the x-y plane,
with progression in time marked along the z-axis. (For ease of visualization, only two dimensions of space are
considered.) When a brief flash of light is emitted from a point source, it extends outwards from the point
equally in all directions, at the speed of c = 3.0× 108 m/s. This trajectory forms a cone on our space-time
diagram, as shown in Figure 11.
Figure 1: Space-time Diagram of the Trajectory of Light
In the presence of a strong gravitational field such as a neutron star, the light cone extending from the
point source starts to tilt toward the center of the star—closer proximities yield greater tilts. In an object as
massive as a black hole, there comes a point where the light cone tilts so much that one side of it is entirely
parallel to the world-line of the point mass (see Figure 2, where the thick line represents the world-line of
1taken from Wikimedia Commons, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:World line.svg on April 16, 2011
4
![Page 5: Physics 105 { Spring 2011 Astrophysics Singularitiesmkruse/PHY105_S11/projects/Jennifer_Molnar… · was on his Special Theory of Relativity, which described the way space and time](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022070919/5fb8d4857e27df1b1d1d3380/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
the black hole and the thin dotted line represents the event horizon, past which no light can escape):
Figure 2: Light Cones Near a Black Hole
Since nothing can travel faster than light, all events in the future of an object or particle must correspond
to a world line that falls entirely within a light cone centered at that object. It is then possible to see, from
Figure 2, that any particle within the event horizon of a black hole must move further toward the center of
mass of the black hole. Even light must converge to this point; there is no other possibility. This rule applies
even to the matter that makes up the black hole itself: it must compress and continue compressing, until
it reaches a point of infinite density and infinitesimal size. There is no coordinate system possible in which
this phenomenon does not occur; the point at which this system reaches a point of infinite density is known
as a “singularity.”
A calculation of infinity in a physics formula is usually an indication that a formula has reached a limit
at which it ceases to apply to the real world. The infinite amount of energy that was calculated to exist
in a black body box was an indication that some information was missing from the classical formulas—
information that was eventually supplied by quantum mechanics. In this case, the “infinity” comes from the
gravitational formula,
F =GMm
r2(8)
or in other words, F ∝ 1r2 , where r is the distance from little mass m to the center of gravity. As the distance
from the center of gravity decreases, the force increases to infinity. But this formula no longer applies once
the distance is smaller than the radius of the object itself. Once the small mass gets close enough to the
center of mass of the large object to be below its surface, a different formula holds (F ∝ r), because the net
gravitational pull on the object is only due to the mass beneath it. (Mass above it will pull on it equally in
all directions, creating a net zero gravitational force.) The general relationship between gravitational force
and radius is illustrated in Figure 3.
Clearly, the infinity shown in the graph only can occur in real life if the radius of the large mass, M , is
equal to zero. At first glance this appears to be an unrealistic scenario, but observe: by keeping the mass
5
![Page 6: Physics 105 { Spring 2011 Astrophysics Singularitiesmkruse/PHY105_S11/projects/Jennifer_Molnar… · was on his Special Theory of Relativity, which described the way space and time](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022070919/5fb8d4857e27df1b1d1d3380/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Figure 3: Proportional Relationship of Gravitational Force and Radius
constant and increasing the density (thereby decreasing the radius), the point at which the transition is made
between the F ∝ 1/r2 formula and the F ∝ r formula moves farther to the left, rising higher and higher
along the dotted line. The star must output a tremendous amount of thermal energy to maintain a high
enough pressure to prevent collapse. As a star uses up fuel and creates less thermal energy, it is conceivable
for the star’s pressure to decrease, the radius to shrink, and the gravitational force to reach a point (the
Schwartzschild radius) where particles on the surface of the star are being pulled inward too strongly for
thermal energy to resist them. This shrinks the star even further, creating a cycle that will inevitably lead
to a black hole.
Any mass can become a singularity if compressed tightly enough. The question then is, is there a feasible
process by which matter can be compressed to this point? Above a certain threshold mass, this level of
compression is practically inevitable. It begins with a main-sequence star, composed mostly of hydrogen
(the most abundant element in our universe), with a mass at least 25 times that of our sun. The star
experiences two opposing forces, which keep it generally in stasis—the force of its own intense gravity,
trying to pull the molecules inward, and the pressure from the thermal energy in its interior, pushing the
particles outwards. If at any time one of these forces becomes more powerful than the other, the star’s size
shifts—either by compressing or expanding, if the shift is gradual, or by explosion/implosion if the change is
rapid (potentially expelling outer layers of gas, further shifting the star’s size), until the star again reaches
equilibrium between the two forces.
At early stages of the star’s life, the thermal energy that prevents the star from collapsing is supplied by
the nuclear fusion of hydrogen atoms. There are several possible reactions that can and do take place, but
6
![Page 7: Physics 105 { Spring 2011 Astrophysics Singularitiesmkruse/PHY105_S11/projects/Jennifer_Molnar… · was on his Special Theory of Relativity, which described the way space and time](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022070919/5fb8d4857e27df1b1d1d3380/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
by far the most common reaction is the PPI chain, which proceeds according the following sequence:
11H +1
1 H → 21H + e+ + νe (9)
21H +1
1 H → 32He + γ (10)
32He +3
2 He → 42He + 211H (11)
The net reaction is the synthesis of four hydrogen atoms into one helium atom and two electrons, two
neutrinos, and two photons. Energy is produced by this reaction and carried away by the neutrinos and
photons.
As more of the hydrogen gets converted to helium, the average particle mass increases and so does the
density. Along with the density, the pressure and temperature also rise, until the star is able to produce
the activation energy necessary to overcome the Coulomb barrier between two helium atoms and fuse them
to produce carbon. This is called the triple alpha reaction, and can only occur at temperatures that are 64
times the temperature required to burn hydrogen. This process again produces energy that is carried away
by photons, and causes the average particle mass (and thus star density and temperature) to continue to
increase.
Not all stars have enough mass to reach the stages at which helium can be fused; fewer still are able to
proceed to the next step to burn carbon and oxygen. At every stage, the amount of energy that needs to be
present for the reaction to proceed increases, and the energy produced diminishes. At a certain size, further
fusion reactions actually absorb energy instead of producing it. The final product of nuclear fusion is 56Fe.
At the point when 56Fe is being generated, the star is running out of fuel and does not have very long to
live.
While the internal structure of the star can be fairly complex at this point, with layers of iron, silicon,
carbon and oxygen near its core, all the way up to helium and hydrogen in its outer layers—each potentially
fusing into heavier particles where densities remain high enough to allow it, near the boundaries of each
level—the important part of this discussion is that nuclear burning cannot go on interminably. At a certain
point, each layer no longer has sufficient temperature and pressure for any more fusion to occur, and the
star runs out of thermal energy.
Without the fuel to sustain it, gravity rapidly overcomes the opposing thermal forces keeping it at bay.
The star collapses quickly and dramatically to a hot and tightly-compressed ball of heavier atoms, rotating
extremely quickly because of the decreased rotational inertia. Depending on the original mass, a star may
compress to a white dwarf or a neutron star, supported against the force of gravity by electron or neutron
7
![Page 8: Physics 105 { Spring 2011 Astrophysics Singularitiesmkruse/PHY105_S11/projects/Jennifer_Molnar… · was on his Special Theory of Relativity, which described the way space and time](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022070919/5fb8d4857e27df1b1d1d3380/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
degeneracy (respectively). However, at masses exceeding 25 solar masses, the star will almost certainly be
too massive for even neutron degeneracy to sustain it. The star shrinks below the Schwartzschild radius
into a black hole, and from then on it is past the point of no return. All light cones point inward, towards
its center, and the matter must remain within the boundaries that those light cones set until the matter
compresses entirely into a point of infinite density and infinitesimal space: the singularity. In this case, the
singularity is known as a space-like singularity.
Roger Penrose proposed another type of singularity, the time-like singularity, in January of 1965. If a
group of celestial bodies is brought close together, the mutual gravity between them all will attract them
towards their center of mass. With a little translational velocity, the bodies will be mostly prevented from
colliding and will instead be on orbital trajectories around this center, subject to deflection by nearby objects.
Occasionally, these deflections impart enough energy to one of the objects to allow it to actually leave the
cluster; conservation of energy states that the remaining matter will then have less energy, move slower, and
be closer together. If the initial mass is high enough and the “evaporation” of matter cooling enough, it
does not matter if the leftover masses do not eventually compress into a single point: the only requirement
for a black hole is that there exist a radius inside of which light cannot escape, and this conglomeration of
stars may provide that.
Despite having plausible mechanisms for how a black hole could be created, scientists have been cautious
to accept their existence. A singularity is a point at which the universe apparently ceases to exist. There
are no known physical laws that describe such points, and no way of testing any hypotheses that allows for
the experimental results to return to the rest of humanity. However, significant evidence has been found
for the existence of black holes. M87, a galaxy in the Virgo constellation, shows an extremely dense cluster
of stars in its center—evidence of a stronger attraction than could be accounted for by the stars’ collective
mass. The existence of a black hole at the center of the galaxy became a well-founded explanation when the
Hubble telescope provided images that showed spiral-shaped gas rotating rapidly around a central object.
The angular speed of the gas at its outer edges was 550,000 m/s, suggesting that the mass of the central
object was over three billion times the mass of our Sun and yet occupied a space no larger than the Milky
Way. This was the first definitive discovery of a black hole.
Other potential black holes have been discovered in binary star systems. Cygnus X-1 is a star in the
Cygnus constellation, which orbits its companion every five-and-a-half days, as is determined by analyzing
the periodicity of its red- and blue-shifts. The companion star is dark, but a heavy emitter of x-rays; this and
the low periodicity of Cygnus X-1, which is a blue supergiant of high mass, suggest that the companion star
is small but massive: either a neutron star or a black hole. Cygnus X-1’s luminosity and the hue distortion
8
![Page 9: Physics 105 { Spring 2011 Astrophysics Singularitiesmkruse/PHY105_S11/projects/Jennifer_Molnar… · was on his Special Theory of Relativity, which described the way space and time](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022070919/5fb8d4857e27df1b1d1d3380/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
due to light absorption by interstellar dust reveal its radius and distance from Earth, which can be used to
estimate the radius of its companion star. The estimation places this mass at somewhere between 8 and 18
solar masses, which is much more massive than a neutron star: Cygnus X-1’s stellar companion is almost
certainly a black hole.
Singularities, then, do exist. The implications of this statement are unknown. At a point where space-time
no longer exists, what can occur? Speculation ranges from worm-holes to entrances to alternate universes,
but regardless, there is no way for us to find out. Whatever strange things go on near a singularity do not
affect the rest of the universe, because the singularity is “clothed” by its event horizon. Roger Penrose, in his
paper on gravitational collapse in 1969, made the famous speculation that singularities may all be clothed—
that there may be some sort of “cosmic censor” that prevents them from ever being visible (”naked”) to a
far-away observer. However, he stated that mathematically, solutions can be found that allow light to escape
from a singular point in space-time—there is a possibility that naked singularities exist. However, it is yet
to be determined whether or not these solutions have any physical basis.
The Schwartzschild metric that considers the case of an uncharged, non-rotating black hole has already
been discussed. Realistically, however, neither of these conditions are likely to be met. Any system is likely
to have some initial rotational velocity, and as this matter gets compressed, the decrease in rotational inertia
causes the angular velocity to speed up. The effect is exactly comparable to an ice skater pulling her hands
in to her chest during a spin. The presence of charge also adds some conditions to the metric, since charge
presumably must still be conserved, even in the vicinity of black holes. The more complicated equations
that apply to this type of singularity are known as the Kerr-Newman solutions, where Kerr’s contribution
was to consider rotation and Newman’s was to take charge into account.
For reference, the equation describing the Schwartzschild metric is shown below:
ds2 = −[1− 2m
r
]dt2 +
dr2
1− 2m/r+ r2dθ2 + r2sin2θdφ2 (12)
where m is the mass of the central object and ds2 refers to the proper distance between two points. For
reference, compare this to Equation 2, the formula describing ds2 for flat space. When m = 0, the formula
reduces to the flat space formula.
The original form for Kerr’s equations was written
ds2 =
[1
2mr
r2 + a2cos2θ
](du+a sin2θdφ)2+2(du+a sin2θdφ)(dr+a sin2θdφ)+(r2+a2cos2θ)(dθ2+sin2θdφ2)
(13)
9
![Page 10: Physics 105 { Spring 2011 Astrophysics Singularitiesmkruse/PHY105_S11/projects/Jennifer_Molnar… · was on his Special Theory of Relativity, which described the way space and time](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022070919/5fb8d4857e27df1b1d1d3380/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Again, by plugging in m = 0, one again derives the formula as it corresponds to flat space-time. Plugging
in a = 0, where a is the parameter describing the rotation of the main mass body (am represents the
magnitude of the angular momentum), yields the original Schwartzschild metric. Arriving at this solution
was no mean feat: the Kerr solution was published by Roy Kerr in 1963, 48 years after Einstein published his
general theory of relativity. Karl Schwartzschild’s solution was first published within two months. Such an
eminent person as Chandrasekhar extolled Kerr’s solution as “splendorous, joyful, and immensely ornate,”
recognizing its importance in astrophysics.
The Newman solution handles the case of a charged mass. In Newman’s paper, published with five
contemporaries in 1964, the Newman metric was given in matrix form:
gµν =
x(−a2sin2θ x(r2 + a2) 0 −xa
. x[2mr − (r2 + a2)− e2] 0 xa
. . −x 0
. . . x(−sin−2θ)
(14)
gµν =
1 + x(e2 − 2mr) 1 0 x(asin2θ)(2mr − e2)
. 0 0 −asin2θ
. . −x−1 0
. . . −sin2θ(r2 + a2 + ag03)
(15)
where x = (r2 + a2cos2θ)−1. Again observe the connection with the previously shown formulas.
The Kerr-Newman metric predicts an event horizon for all cases in which m ≥ a2 + e2. In cases where
m < a2 + e2, there could conceivably be a singularity which allowed some light to escape and reach outside
observers. Because of the powerful gravity nearby the singularity, the light would be distorted and convo-
luted, so an observer’s ability to interpret the outgoing information might be in question. Regardless of its
intelligibility, however, a naked singularity would allow whatever strangeness can occur there the capability
of extending causal influence on outside parts of the universe. Again, scientists are skeptical that such a
system actually exists; no evidence for one has yet been discovered. On the other hand, without knowing
what goes on in the vicinity of a singularity, it is hard to know what to look for. The question that scientists
ask instead is one of feasibility: what would the structure of the singularity have to be in order for it to be
naked, and is there a mechanism by which that structure can form?
According to the Kerr-Newman equations, all that really has to occur for a naked singularity to form is
for a black hole to gain enough rotation or charge to exceed its mass parameter. However, creating such a
10
![Page 11: Physics 105 { Spring 2011 Astrophysics Singularitiesmkruse/PHY105_S11/projects/Jennifer_Molnar… · was on his Special Theory of Relativity, which described the way space and time](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022070919/5fb8d4857e27df1b1d1d3380/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
black hole or manipulating a pre-existing one in such a way that it is able to meet these conditions seems
to be impossible. In principle, it seems that one could increase the rotation of a black hole by firing a
stream of particles toward its event horizon tangentially, or by dropping a rapidly-rotating mass into the
black hole from the top. However, the rotational inertia acquired by the black hole due to the increase
actually overcompensates for the gain in angular momentum. An attempt to fire massless particles (such
as photons) into the black hole to speed it up will not contribute mass, but will contribute energy, which
still adds to the mass of the hole. However, photons also have spin. An alternative experiment could be
tried wherein photons are not shot tangentially into the black hole but dropped down into it with the spin
in the appropriate direction—much like the mass in Figure 4. By increasing the wavelength, the energy
imparted is decreased, so that the gain in spin is more significant than the gain in energy. Unfortunately,
the wavelengths necessary for this are so large that the photons are more likely to scatter off of the black
hole than to be absorbed by it.
Likewise, it seems possible to increase the charge of a black hole by firing charged particles into it until
a naked singularity forms. However, as the charge inside the black hole builds up, it takes more and more
energy to fire additional charged particles into it, until the energy input into the black hole again outweighs
the increase in charge.
Figure 4: Model for Increasing the Rotation of a Black Hole
Let us abandon for the moment the practical difficulties in trying to defeat the “cosmic censor.” One
purely mathematical example of a naked singularity is E.P.T. Liang’s infinite cylinder. Liang showed that
collapsing matter into a line of infinite density instead of a single point would create a string singularity
without an event horizon. It is difficult to determine whether or not this possibility has any realistic analogs:
the model needs to be validated for cases where the cylinder is finite or has small deviations from being
perfectly symmetrical. Because of the complexity of Einstein’s field equations, this has not yet been done.
Another mathematical model for a naked singularity was generated by Dr H. Muller zum Hagen. His
11
![Page 12: Physics 105 { Spring 2011 Astrophysics Singularitiesmkruse/PHY105_S11/projects/Jennifer_Molnar… · was on his Special Theory of Relativity, which described the way space and time](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022070919/5fb8d4857e27df1b1d1d3380/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
theoretical naked singularity occurs if the outside of a collapsing star moves inward faster than the inside
does. If this is the case, the outer layers may be able to meet the inner layers at a certain radius; then
an infinitely dense shell exists that allows a spherical naked singularity to develop. This model also makes
several idealizations which may make it inapplicable to the real universe, including the assumption that the
matter is able to fuse without producing any pressure to prevent all the layers from combining together at
the critical radius.
One last example of a hypothetical system producing a naked singularity is to remove energy or mass
from a black hole to decrease its Schwartzschild radius. If the mass or energy is reduced to zero, then the
Schwartzschild radius is also zero, and whatever singularity is left will be visible to a far-away observer. This
last model has some promise to it, as black holes do lose mass over time. This mass does not come from
matter that has fallen into the hole; that matter is unable to escape the event horizon. Instead, Stephan
Hawking in 1974 discovered that a moderately-sized black hole can be approximately the size of an atomic
nucleus. At distances so small, quantum mechanics needs to be taken into account, and quantum mechanics
allows a non-zero probability for subatomic particles to pop in and out of existence. These particles include
small units of negative mass-energy. If two particles are created near the event horizon—one with positive
mass-energy and one with negative mass-energy—and the negative particle is absorbed by the black hole
while the positive one escapes, then the mass of the black hole has effectively been reduced slightly. Hawking
further discovered that the radiation of particles out of a black hole increases as the black hole’s size decreases.
This predicts that as the black hole begins to lose mass, the process of its evaporation speeds up more and
more in a positive feedback loop. Thermodynamically speaking, the black hole emits blackbody radiation
with a temperature that increases exponentially as the hole evaporates. This self-propagating cycle implies
that the black hole will eventually evaporate away. When it does, with a final explosion as its temperature
sky-rockets, a naked singularity may be left.
There are theoretical difficulties with this solution. John Wheeler’s no-hair theorem suggests that black
holes are defined by three and only three characteristics from the outside: their mass, their angular momen-
tum, and their charge. This makes black hole radiation independent of whatever specific objects originally
fell into the black hole—the only thing that determines any aspect of the radiated particles is the black
hole’s mass. If the black hole is able to shrink to nothing via radiation, then this violates the principle
of Conservation of Information, which assumes that if the complete state of a system is known, then it is
theoretically possible to reconstruct all its past and future states. The loss of information that occurs when
masses fall into a black hole is called the “information paradox,” and has not yet been resolved.
The other difficulty with this hypothesis is that no evidence has been found of such black hole explosions;
12
![Page 13: Physics 105 { Spring 2011 Astrophysics Singularitiesmkruse/PHY105_S11/projects/Jennifer_Molnar… · was on his Special Theory of Relativity, which described the way space and time](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022070919/5fb8d4857e27df1b1d1d3380/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
this does not rule out the possibility, though, as they may be extremely uncommon. A lower limit to
their prevalence can even be established: if there were more than a few nucleus-sized black holes (about a
billion tons in mass) per 1027 km3, then their mass would exceed the mass of the galaxies of the universe,
producing very obvious effects. Discovery of an exploding black hole is also limited by the sensitivity of our
equipment: even if the explosion is comparable to the detonation of a million megaton bomb, its effects will
be indiscernible unless it is quite close to our solar system. Martin Rees of Cambridge University points
out that it may still be possible to detect an exploding black hole by detecting a byproduct of the explosion
itself: the disturbance in the local electromagnetic field will reach the surface of Earth in the form of a
radio wave. Radio astronomers have found nothing yet, which suggests that if black hole explosions exist,
they occur at a rate of less than one per million cubic light years per year. Any definitive conclusions await
further research.
3 Conclusion
Einstein’s General Theory of Relativity predicted that masses are able to affect the very structure of space-
time, allowing large masses to influence even massless particles such as light. When masses are compressed
to very high densities, the inverse-square law predicts that they may be able to curve space to such an
extent that all matter and energy within an “event horizon” must converge to an infinitely-dense point,
known as a singularity. Though the existence of singularities was debated for some time, current evidence
shows strong evidence for the existence of black holes—singularities that do exhibit this event horizon.
Speculation on naked singularities (singularities without this event horizon) has led to some interesting
models and predictions, but research has not yet been able to provide any evidence of any violations of
Penrose’s “cosmic censorship” hypothesis: that at locations as strange and unpredictable as singularities, it
is impossible for any causal connection to exist between the singularity and the outside universe.
A Bibliography
• Class notes (Physics 105, Duke University, Professor Mark Kruse, Spring 2011)
• Davies, P. C. W. The Edge of Infinity: Where the Universe Came from and How It Will End. New
York: Simon and Schuster, 1981. Print.
• Penrose, Roger. ”Gravitational collapse: the role of general relativity” Rivista del Nuovo Cimento, 1
(1969) pp. 252276
13
![Page 14: Physics 105 { Spring 2011 Astrophysics Singularitiesmkruse/PHY105_S11/projects/Jennifer_Molnar… · was on his Special Theory of Relativity, which described the way space and time](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022070919/5fb8d4857e27df1b1d1d3380/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
• Shapiro, Stuart L., and Saul A. Teukolsky.Black Holes, White Dwarfs, and Neutron Stars: the Physics
of Compact Objects. Weinheim: Wiley, 2004. Print.
• ”Kerr Metric.” Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia. Web. 21 Apr. 2011. <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
Kerr metric>.
• Visser, Matt. ”The Kerr Spacetime: A Brief Introduction.” Apr. 2011. <http://arxiv.org/abs/0706.0622>.
• Shapiro and Teulosky. Formation of Naked Singularities: A Violation of Cosmic Censorship. (1991)
• ”Theory of Relativity.” Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia. Web. 21 Apr. 2011. <http://en.wikipedia.org/
wiki/Theory of relativity>.
• Griffiths, David Jeffrey. Introduction to Electrodynamics. Upper Saddle River, NJ [u.a.: Prentice Hall,
1999. Pages 500-504.
• ”HyperPhysics.” Web. Apr. 2011. <http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/hframe.html>.
• ”HubbleSite - NewsCenter - Hubble Confirms Existence of Massive Black Hole at Heart of Active
Galaxy (05/25/1994) - Release Text.” HubbleSite - Out of the Ordinary...out of This World. Web.
Apr. 2011. <http://hubblesite.org/newscenter/archive/releases/1994/23/text/>.
• E. T. Newman, E. Couch, K. Chinnapared, A. Exton, A. Prakash and R. Torrence: Journ. Math.
Phys., 6, 918 (1965).
• “Eric Weisstein’s World of Physics.” Web. Apr. 2011. <http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/physics/
BlackHoleNoHairTheorem.html>.
14