physical realizations of qc @ tehran, jan. 2009 1 mikio nakahara, research centre for quantum...

48
Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009 1 Liquid State Liquid State NMR Quantum NMR Quantum Computing Computing Mikio Nakahara, Mikio Nakahara, Research Centre for Quantum Research Centre for Quantum Computing, Kinki University, Computing, Kinki University, Japan Japan Financial supports from Kinki Univ., MEXT and JSPS

Upload: virgil-harris

Post on 25-Dec-2015

215 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009 1 Mikio Nakahara, Research Centre for Quantum Computing, Kinki University, Japan Financial supports from

Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009

1

Liquid State NMR Liquid State NMR Quantum Quantum ComputingComputing

Mikio Nakahara,Mikio Nakahara,

Research Centre for Quantum Research Centre for Quantum Computing, Kinki University, JapanComputing, Kinki University, Japan

Financial supports from Kinki Univ.,

MEXT and JSPS

Page 2: Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009 1 Mikio Nakahara, Research Centre for Quantum Computing, Kinki University, Japan Financial supports from

Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009

2

Plan of Talk

1. Introduction 2. NMR2. NMR 3. NMR Hamiltonian 4. Gate Operations 5. Pseudopure State 6. Measurement 7. DiVincenzo Criteria 8. Summary

Page 3: Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009 1 Mikio Nakahara, Research Centre for Quantum Computing, Kinki University, Japan Financial supports from

Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009

3

1. Introduction

Page 4: Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009 1 Mikio Nakahara, Research Centre for Quantum Computing, Kinki University, Japan Financial supports from

Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009

4

Qubits in NMR Molecule

Trichloroethylene

Page 5: Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009 1 Mikio Nakahara, Research Centre for Quantum Computing, Kinki University, Japan Financial supports from

Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009

5

Plan of Talk

1. Introduction 2. NMR2. NMR 3. NMR Hamiltonian 4. Gate Operations 5. Pseudo-Pure State 6. Measurement 7. DiVincenzo Criteria 8. Summary

Page 6: Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009 1 Mikio Nakahara, Research Centre for Quantum Computing, Kinki University, Japan Financial supports from

Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009

6

NMR (Nuclear Magnetic Resonance ) =MRI (Magnetic Resonance Imaging)

Page 7: Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009 1 Mikio Nakahara, Research Centre for Quantum Computing, Kinki University, Japan Financial supports from

Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009

7

NMR

Page 8: Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009 1 Mikio Nakahara, Research Centre for Quantum Computing, Kinki University, Japan Financial supports from

Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009

8

Schematic of NMR

Page 9: Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009 1 Mikio Nakahara, Research Centre for Quantum Computing, Kinki University, Japan Financial supports from

Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009

9

Molecules used in NMR QC

Page 10: Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009 1 Mikio Nakahara, Research Centre for Quantum Computing, Kinki University, Japan Financial supports from

Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009

10

Plan of Talk

1. Introduction 2. NMR2. NMR 3. NMR Hamiltonian 4. Gate Operations 5. Pseudopure State 6. Measurement 7. DiVincenzo Criteria 8. Summary

Page 11: Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009 1 Mikio Nakahara, Research Centre for Quantum Computing, Kinki University, Japan Financial supports from

Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009

11

3.1 Single-Qubit Hamiltonian

Page 12: Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009 1 Mikio Nakahara, Research Centre for Quantum Computing, Kinki University, Japan Financial supports from

Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009

12

Hamiltonian in Rotating Frame

Page 13: Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009 1 Mikio Nakahara, Research Centre for Quantum Computing, Kinki University, Japan Financial supports from

Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009

13

Page 14: Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009 1 Mikio Nakahara, Research Centre for Quantum Computing, Kinki University, Japan Financial supports from

Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009

14

2-Qubit Hamiltonian

Page 15: Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009 1 Mikio Nakahara, Research Centre for Quantum Computing, Kinki University, Japan Financial supports from

Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009

15

Page 16: Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009 1 Mikio Nakahara, Research Centre for Quantum Computing, Kinki University, Japan Financial supports from

Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009

16

Page 17: Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009 1 Mikio Nakahara, Research Centre for Quantum Computing, Kinki University, Japan Financial supports from

Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009

17

Plan of Talk

1. Introduction 2. NMR2. NMR 3. NMR Hamiltonian 4. Gate Operations 5. Pseudopure State 6. Measurement 7. DiVincenzo Criteria 8. Summary

Page 18: Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009 1 Mikio Nakahara, Research Centre for Quantum Computing, Kinki University, Japan Financial supports from

Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009

18

1-Qubit Gates

Page 19: Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009 1 Mikio Nakahara, Research Centre for Quantum Computing, Kinki University, Japan Financial supports from

Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009

19

Example: Hadamard gate

Page 20: Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009 1 Mikio Nakahara, Research Centre for Quantum Computing, Kinki University, Japan Financial supports from

Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009

20

Example: Hadamard gate 2

Page 21: Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009 1 Mikio Nakahara, Research Centre for Quantum Computing, Kinki University, Japan Financial supports from

Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009

21

Selective addressing

Page 22: Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009 1 Mikio Nakahara, Research Centre for Quantum Computing, Kinki University, Japan Financial supports from

Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009

22

In resonance: .

Page 23: Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009 1 Mikio Nakahara, Research Centre for Quantum Computing, Kinki University, Japan Financial supports from

Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009

23

0 .1

0 .0

0 .1

0 .1

0 .0

0 .1

0 .9900 .9951 .000

Page 24: Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009 1 Mikio Nakahara, Research Centre for Quantum Computing, Kinki University, Japan Financial supports from

Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009

24

0 .05

0 .00

0 .05

0 .05

0 .00

0 .05

0 .9980 .9991 .000

Page 25: Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009 1 Mikio Nakahara, Research Centre for Quantum Computing, Kinki University, Japan Financial supports from

Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009

25

2-Qubit Gates: CNOT

Page 26: Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009 1 Mikio Nakahara, Research Centre for Quantum Computing, Kinki University, Japan Financial supports from

Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009

26

Plan of Talk

1. Introduction 2. NMR2. NMR 3. NMR Hamiltonian 4. Gate Operations 5. Pseudopure State 6. Measurement 7. DiVincenzo Criteria 8. Summary

Page 27: Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009 1 Mikio Nakahara, Research Centre for Quantum Computing, Kinki University, Japan Financial supports from

Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009

27

Spins are in mixed state!

Page 28: Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009 1 Mikio Nakahara, Research Centre for Quantum Computing, Kinki University, Japan Financial supports from

Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009

28

Preparation of a pseudopure state in terms of temporal average method

Page 29: Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009 1 Mikio Nakahara, Research Centre for Quantum Computing, Kinki University, Japan Financial supports from

Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009

29

Temporal average method

Page 30: Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009 1 Mikio Nakahara, Research Centre for Quantum Computing, Kinki University, Japan Financial supports from

Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009

30

Averaging three contributions

Page 31: Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009 1 Mikio Nakahara, Research Centre for Quantum Computing, Kinki University, Japan Financial supports from

Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009

31

Plan of Talk

1. Introduction 2. NMR2. NMR 3. NMR Hamiltonian 4. Gate Operations 5. Pseudopure State 6. Measurement 7. DiVincenzo Criteria 8. Summary

Page 32: Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009 1 Mikio Nakahara, Research Centre for Quantum Computing, Kinki University, Japan Financial supports from

Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009

32

6.1 Free Induction Decay (FID)

|00〉 |01〉

|10〉 |11〉

Page 33: Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009 1 Mikio Nakahara, Research Centre for Quantum Computing, Kinki University, Japan Financial supports from

Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009

33

Free Induction Decay (FID)

Page 34: Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009 1 Mikio Nakahara, Research Centre for Quantum Computing, Kinki University, Japan Financial supports from

Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009

34

Page 35: Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009 1 Mikio Nakahara, Research Centre for Quantum Computing, Kinki University, Japan Financial supports from

Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009

35

6.2 Quantum State Tomography We want to “measure” the density matrix. Measure observable such as

magnetizations to find linear combinations of the matrix elements of the density matrix.

Not enough equations are obtained. Deform the density matrix with pulses to

obtain enough number of equations.

Page 36: Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009 1 Mikio Nakahara, Research Centre for Quantum Computing, Kinki University, Japan Financial supports from

Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009

36

2-Qubit QST

Page 37: Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009 1 Mikio Nakahara, Research Centre for Quantum Computing, Kinki University, Japan Financial supports from

Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009

37

Page 38: Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009 1 Mikio Nakahara, Research Centre for Quantum Computing, Kinki University, Japan Financial supports from

Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009

38

Page 39: Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009 1 Mikio Nakahara, Research Centre for Quantum Computing, Kinki University, Japan Financial supports from

Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009

39

Plan of Talk

1. Introduction 2. NMR2. NMR 3. NMR Hamiltonian 4. Gate Operations 5. Pseudopure State 6. Measurement 7. DiVincenzo Criteria 8. Summary

Page 40: Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009 1 Mikio Nakahara, Research Centre for Quantum Computing, Kinki University, Japan Financial supports from

Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009

40

DiVincenzo Criteria for NMR QCDiVincenzo Criteria for NMR QC A scalable physical system with well charactA scalable physical system with well charact

erized qubits.erized qubits. The ability to initialize the state of the qubits The ability to initialize the state of the qubits

to a simple fiducial state, such as |00…0>.to a simple fiducial state, such as |00…0>. Long decoherence times, much longer than Long decoherence times, much longer than

the gate operation time.the gate operation time. A “universal” set of quantum gates.A “universal” set of quantum gates. A qubit-specific measurement capability.A qubit-specific measurement capability.

Page 41: Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009 1 Mikio Nakahara, Research Centre for Quantum Computing, Kinki University, Japan Financial supports from

Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009

41

Scalability Selective addressing to each qubit becom

es harder and hader as the # of qubits increases. Limited # of nuclear spices and overlap of resonance freqs.

Signal strength is suppressed as the # of qubits increases. Readout problem.

Page 42: Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009 1 Mikio Nakahara, Research Centre for Quantum Computing, Kinki University, Japan Financial supports from

Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009

42

Initialization (pseudopure state) # of steps required to prepare a pseudopur

e state increases exponentially as the # of qubits increases.

No real entanglement

Page 43: Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009 1 Mikio Nakahara, Research Centre for Quantum Computing, Kinki University, Japan Financial supports from

Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009

43

Long decoherence time Decoherence time Single-qubit gate operation time Two-qubit gate op. time May execute Shor’s algorithm for 21=3X7.

Page 44: Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009 1 Mikio Nakahara, Research Centre for Quantum Computing, Kinki University, Japan Financial supports from

Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009

44

A “universal” set of quantum gates.A “universal” set of quantum gates. One-qubit gates by Rabi oscillation. Two-qubit gates by J-coupling. Cannot turn off interactions; reforcusing te

chnique becomes complicated as the # of qubits increases.

Page 45: Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009 1 Mikio Nakahara, Research Centre for Quantum Computing, Kinki University, Japan Financial supports from

Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009

45

Measurement capability.Measurement capability.

FID is a well-established techunique. Quantum State Tomograpy and Quantum

Process Tomography are OK. S/N scales as , which limits

the # of qubits to ~ 10.

Page 46: Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009 1 Mikio Nakahara, Research Centre for Quantum Computing, Kinki University, Japan Financial supports from

Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009

46

Still… NMR QC is commercially available. It can execute small scale quantum algorithms. It serves as a test bed for a real QC to come. May ideas in other realizations are inspired from

NMR. We use NMR QC to demonstrate theoretical

ideas, such as decoherence suppression, optimal control of a Hamiltonian etc.

Page 47: Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009 1 Mikio Nakahara, Research Centre for Quantum Computing, Kinki University, Japan Financial supports from

Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009

47

Plan of Talk

1. Introduction 2. NMR2. NMR 3. NMR Hamiltonian 4. Gate Operations 5. Pseudopure State 6. Measurement 7. DiVincenzo Criteria 8. Summary

Page 48: Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009 1 Mikio Nakahara, Research Centre for Quantum Computing, Kinki University, Japan Financial supports from

Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009

48

Liquid state NMR QC is based on a well-established technology. Most of the materials introduced here have been already known in the NMR community for decades.

There are still many papers on NMR QC. It is required to find a breakthrogh for a liquid sta

te NMR to be a candidate of a working QC. ENDOR, Solid state NMR… Thank you for your attention.