physical realizations of qc @ tehran, jan. 2009 1 mikio nakahara, research centre for quantum...
TRANSCRIPT
Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009
1
Liquid State NMR Liquid State NMR Quantum Quantum ComputingComputing
Mikio Nakahara,Mikio Nakahara,
Research Centre for Quantum Research Centre for Quantum Computing, Kinki University, JapanComputing, Kinki University, Japan
Financial supports from Kinki Univ.,
MEXT and JSPS
Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009
2
Plan of Talk
1. Introduction 2. NMR2. NMR 3. NMR Hamiltonian 4. Gate Operations 5. Pseudopure State 6. Measurement 7. DiVincenzo Criteria 8. Summary
Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009
3
1. Introduction
Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009
4
Qubits in NMR Molecule
Trichloroethylene
Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009
5
Plan of Talk
1. Introduction 2. NMR2. NMR 3. NMR Hamiltonian 4. Gate Operations 5. Pseudo-Pure State 6. Measurement 7. DiVincenzo Criteria 8. Summary
Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009
6
NMR (Nuclear Magnetic Resonance ) =MRI (Magnetic Resonance Imaging)
Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009
7
NMR
Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009
8
Schematic of NMR
Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009
9
Molecules used in NMR QC
Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009
10
Plan of Talk
1. Introduction 2. NMR2. NMR 3. NMR Hamiltonian 4. Gate Operations 5. Pseudopure State 6. Measurement 7. DiVincenzo Criteria 8. Summary
Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009
11
3.1 Single-Qubit Hamiltonian
Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009
12
Hamiltonian in Rotating Frame
Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009
13
Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009
14
2-Qubit Hamiltonian
Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009
15
Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009
16
Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009
17
Plan of Talk
1. Introduction 2. NMR2. NMR 3. NMR Hamiltonian 4. Gate Operations 5. Pseudopure State 6. Measurement 7. DiVincenzo Criteria 8. Summary
Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009
18
1-Qubit Gates
Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009
19
Example: Hadamard gate
Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009
20
Example: Hadamard gate 2
Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009
21
Selective addressing
Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009
22
In resonance: .
Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009
23
0 .1
0 .0
0 .1
0 .1
0 .0
0 .1
0 .9900 .9951 .000
Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009
24
0 .05
0 .00
0 .05
0 .05
0 .00
0 .05
0 .9980 .9991 .000
Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009
25
2-Qubit Gates: CNOT
Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009
26
Plan of Talk
1. Introduction 2. NMR2. NMR 3. NMR Hamiltonian 4. Gate Operations 5. Pseudopure State 6. Measurement 7. DiVincenzo Criteria 8. Summary
Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009
27
Spins are in mixed state!
Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009
28
Preparation of a pseudopure state in terms of temporal average method
Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009
29
Temporal average method
Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009
30
Averaging three contributions
Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009
31
Plan of Talk
1. Introduction 2. NMR2. NMR 3. NMR Hamiltonian 4. Gate Operations 5. Pseudopure State 6. Measurement 7. DiVincenzo Criteria 8. Summary
Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009
32
6.1 Free Induction Decay (FID)
|00〉 |01〉
|10〉 |11〉
Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009
33
Free Induction Decay (FID)
Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009
34
Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009
35
6.2 Quantum State Tomography We want to “measure” the density matrix. Measure observable such as
magnetizations to find linear combinations of the matrix elements of the density matrix.
Not enough equations are obtained. Deform the density matrix with pulses to
obtain enough number of equations.
Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009
36
2-Qubit QST
Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009
37
Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009
38
Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009
39
Plan of Talk
1. Introduction 2. NMR2. NMR 3. NMR Hamiltonian 4. Gate Operations 5. Pseudopure State 6. Measurement 7. DiVincenzo Criteria 8. Summary
Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009
40
DiVincenzo Criteria for NMR QCDiVincenzo Criteria for NMR QC A scalable physical system with well charactA scalable physical system with well charact
erized qubits.erized qubits. The ability to initialize the state of the qubits The ability to initialize the state of the qubits
to a simple fiducial state, such as |00…0>.to a simple fiducial state, such as |00…0>. Long decoherence times, much longer than Long decoherence times, much longer than
the gate operation time.the gate operation time. A “universal” set of quantum gates.A “universal” set of quantum gates. A qubit-specific measurement capability.A qubit-specific measurement capability.
Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009
41
Scalability Selective addressing to each qubit becom
es harder and hader as the # of qubits increases. Limited # of nuclear spices and overlap of resonance freqs.
Signal strength is suppressed as the # of qubits increases. Readout problem.
Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009
42
Initialization (pseudopure state) # of steps required to prepare a pseudopur
e state increases exponentially as the # of qubits increases.
No real entanglement
Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009
43
Long decoherence time Decoherence time Single-qubit gate operation time Two-qubit gate op. time May execute Shor’s algorithm for 21=3X7.
Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009
44
A “universal” set of quantum gates.A “universal” set of quantum gates. One-qubit gates by Rabi oscillation. Two-qubit gates by J-coupling. Cannot turn off interactions; reforcusing te
chnique becomes complicated as the # of qubits increases.
Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009
45
Measurement capability.Measurement capability.
FID is a well-established techunique. Quantum State Tomograpy and Quantum
Process Tomography are OK. S/N scales as , which limits
the # of qubits to ~ 10.
Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009
46
Still… NMR QC is commercially available. It can execute small scale quantum algorithms. It serves as a test bed for a real QC to come. May ideas in other realizations are inspired from
NMR. We use NMR QC to demonstrate theoretical
ideas, such as decoherence suppression, optimal control of a Hamiltonian etc.
Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009
47
Plan of Talk
1. Introduction 2. NMR2. NMR 3. NMR Hamiltonian 4. Gate Operations 5. Pseudopure State 6. Measurement 7. DiVincenzo Criteria 8. Summary
Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran, Jan. 2009
48
Liquid state NMR QC is based on a well-established technology. Most of the materials introduced here have been already known in the NMR community for decades.
There are still many papers on NMR QC. It is required to find a breakthrogh for a liquid sta
te NMR to be a candidate of a working QC. ENDOR, Solid state NMR… Thank you for your attention.