phonomotor treatment for anomia
DESCRIPTION
Phonomotor treatment for anomia. Diane L. Kendall, PhD Associate Professor, Department of Speech and Hearing Sciences Research Scientist, VAMC Puget Sound. TODAY. Describe study Treatment Results Future. Veterans Affairs (VA) grant 2010- 2013 $850,000 - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Phonomotor treatment for anomia](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062520/568163f6550346895dd58576/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Phonomotor treatment
for anomia
Diane L. Kendall, PhD
Associate Professor, Department of Speech and Hearing Sciences
Research Scientist, VAMC Puget Sound
![Page 2: Phonomotor treatment for anomia](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062520/568163f6550346895dd58576/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
TODAY• Describe study
• Treatment
• Results
• Future
![Page 3: Phonomotor treatment for anomia](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062520/568163f6550346895dd58576/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
• Veterans Affairs (VA) grant
• 2010-2013
• $850,000
• Provide treatment to 30 individuals – aphasia and anomia
![Page 4: Phonomotor treatment for anomia](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062520/568163f6550346895dd58576/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
• Currently, –Data collection finished!!!!!–November 2012
• Analysis of ALL data– Finish June 2013
![Page 5: Phonomotor treatment for anomia](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062520/568163f6550346895dd58576/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
TODAY• Describe study
• Treatment
• Results
• Future
![Page 6: Phonomotor treatment for anomia](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062520/568163f6550346895dd58576/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Participants• N=28• Chronic aphasia
(>6mos)• Left CVA• 18 right-handed, 2
left-handed• 18 Monolingual
English• 2 Bilingual (English
dominant language since childhood)
• Included:– Aphasia – Word retrieval deficits – Impaired phonologic
processing • Excluded– Significant (severe) speech
apraxia– Depression– Degenerative disease– Chronic medical illness
![Page 7: Phonomotor treatment for anomia](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062520/568163f6550346895dd58576/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
N=28 Age (years)
Education Months post
stroke onset
AVE 56 16 47
Range 26-78 12-23 10-211
![Page 8: Phonomotor treatment for anomia](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062520/568163f6550346895dd58576/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Western Aphasia Battery(WAB-AQ)
(out of 100)
Boston Naming Test
(BNT) (spontaneous correct out
of 60)
Standardized Assessment of Phonology in Aphasia
(SAPA) (raw score out of 151)
AVE 79/100 36/60 96/151
General language test
![Page 9: Phonomotor treatment for anomia](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062520/568163f6550346895dd58576/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Western Aphasia Battery(WAB-AQ)
(out of 100)
Boston Naming Test
(BNT) (spontaneous correct out
of 60)
Standardized Assessment of Phonology in Aphasia
(SAPA) (raw score out of 151)
AVE 79/100 36/60 96/151
![Page 10: Phonomotor treatment for anomia](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062520/568163f6550346895dd58576/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Western Aphasia Battery(WAB-AQ)
(out of 100)
Boston Naming Test
(BNT) (spontaneous correct out
of 60)
Standardized Assessment of Phonology in Aphasia
(SAPA) (raw score out of 151)
AVE 79/100 36/60 96/151
Test of ‘sounds”
![Page 11: Phonomotor treatment for anomia](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062520/568163f6550346895dd58576/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Immediate treatment
Immediately post treatment
Testing
Pre-treatment
TestingTreatment
Phase
3-month post treatment testing
1-week 1-week1-week6-weeks 3-m
onth
s
Delayed treatment
Immediately post treatment testing
Pre-treatment
TestingUsual care
control phase
3-months post treatment testing
1-week 1-week1-week6-weeks
Treatment
Phase
6-weeks
Post usual care testing
1-week 3-m
onth
s
N=14
N=14
1-year post testing
1-week1-ye
ar
1-ye
ar
1-week
1-year post testing
![Page 12: Phonomotor treatment for anomia](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062520/568163f6550346895dd58576/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
TODAY• Describe study
• Treatment
• Results
• Future
![Page 13: Phonomotor treatment for anomia](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062520/568163f6550346895dd58576/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
TWO PHASES OF TREATMENT
1) Phonemes in Isolation
2) Phoneme Sequences1-, 2- and 3-syllables
![Page 14: Phonomotor treatment for anomia](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062520/568163f6550346895dd58576/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
How can you tell if treatment works?
![Page 15: Phonomotor treatment for anomia](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062520/568163f6550346895dd58576/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Research Questions
Measures
1. Acquire (learn) PhonologyNaming pictures
2. Does what you learn in therapy generalize to something else??
Naming picturesConversation
3. What about at 3 months and 1 year?
PhonologyNaming pictures
Conversation
![Page 16: Phonomotor treatment for anomia](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062520/568163f6550346895dd58576/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
TODAY• Describe study
• Treatment
• Results
• Future
![Page 17: Phonomotor treatment for anomia](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062520/568163f6550346895dd58576/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Research aim Outcome measureAcquisition
(pre- vs imm post-)N=20
3-mo(pre- vs 3 mo)
N=16
1-yr(pre- vs 1-yr
N=8
LearnTrained nouns P=.000
Pre 64% (SD 26)Post 82% (SD 17)
P=.000Pre 66% (SD 25)Post 79% (SD 22)
P=.016Pre 70% (SD 18)Post 86% (SD 7)
Generalize to phonology
Standardized Assessment of Phonology in Aphasia P= .000
Pre 97 (25)Post 106 (24)
P=.000Pre 97 (25)
Post 106 (26)
P=.010Pre 100 (23)Post 115 (15)
Generalize to words not
seen in therapy
Untrained nouns P=.001Pre 64% (SD 25)Post 70% (SD 25)
P=.033Pre 66% (SD 25)Post 71% (SD 26)
P=.033Pre 68% (SD 20)Post 81% (SD 19)
![Page 18: Phonomotor treatment for anomia](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062520/568163f6550346895dd58576/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Nouns
Pre n=20 Imm n=20 3 mo n=16 1 year n=8 Pre n=20 Imm n=20 3 mo n=16 1 year n=8Real words Trained Real words Untrained
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
* *
*
**
*
Perc
ent a
ccur
acy
![Page 19: Phonomotor treatment for anomia](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062520/568163f6550346895dd58576/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Conversation n=3
• VIDEO
• Productivity (# of clauses, # verbal units, # words): – 2 of 3 more verbal output following therapy – twice the number of clauses, more verbal units, and more words when compared
with before treatment output.
• Grammar (% grammatical clauses): – 0 of 3
• Relevance (% of clauses containing new information, relevance of response to each prompt): – 2 of 3 improved
• Efficiency (self corrections, interjections, irrelevant words): – there was no change in the overall efficiency
![Page 20: Phonomotor treatment for anomia](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062520/568163f6550346895dd58576/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Discussion
• Results support our hypothesis
![Page 21: Phonomotor treatment for anomia](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062520/568163f6550346895dd58576/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
word
“flower”
Idea!
sounds
F + L + OW + R
![Page 22: Phonomotor treatment for anomia](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062520/568163f6550346895dd58576/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
TODAY• Describe study
• Treatment
• Results
• Future
![Page 23: Phonomotor treatment for anomia](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062520/568163f6550346895dd58576/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
New Grant
N=40Phonomotor
treatment
N=40Traditional treatment
(standard of care)
VS.
![Page 24: Phonomotor treatment for anomia](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062520/568163f6550346895dd58576/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
![Page 25: Phonomotor treatment for anomia](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062520/568163f6550346895dd58576/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Acknowledgements• YOU!!!!!• VA RR&D Merit Review Grant
#C6572R• UW Aphasia Lab– Liz Brookshire, MA– Megan Oelke, MA– JoAnn Silkes, PhD– Irene Minkina, BS– Lauren Bislick, MA– Rebecca Pompon, PhC