phil ward research funding manager university of kent

11
Phil Ward Research Funding Manager University of Kent

Upload: ursula-carroll

Post on 30-Dec-2015

217 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Phil Ward Research Funding Manager University of Kent

Phil Ward Research Funding Manager

University of Kent

Page 2: Phil Ward Research Funding Manager University of Kent

Background

• Adrian Alsop visit, Oct 2010• Dispiriting stats (2007-09):– Standard Grants

• 33 apps, 2 awards, 6% success rate

– Small Grants• 43 apps, 10 awards, 23% success rate

– Majority of both graded A3-A5• Also EPSRC, and noises from other RCs• Pointless playing the ‘numbers game’– ...despite what research says (http://ht.ly/4RmVj)

Page 3: Phil Ward Research Funding Manager University of Kent

Development

• Need to build on good practice– eg Computing: research groups comment on all

applications– eg Biosciences: pro forma– eg Humanities: all applications through FDoR

• Need to build consensus– Supportive– Unbureaucratic

Page 4: Phil Ward Research Funding Manager University of Kent

Kent Peer Review

• Affects:– Research Council applications– First substantial applications– Large grant applications (not EU, partnership,

NIHR)• ‘Intention to Apply’ Form• 2 Reviewers– First: knowledge of discipline– Second: knowledge of funder

Page 5: Phil Ward Research Funding Manager University of Kent

Intention to Apply Form

• 2 aims:– To help reviewer understand application– To help applicant structure application

• Series of progressive, interlinked questions:– What’s your question?– Why’s it important?– Why’s it important to answer it now?– What objectives need to be achieved to answer it?– How will you meet these objectives?– How will you disseminate the findings?

Page 6: Phil Ward Research Funding Manager University of Kent

Reviewer Feedback Form

• 2 aims:– To force the reviewer to answer specific issues– To give applicant specific feedback

• Questions include:– Can you speed read it and understand it?– Is the question important?– Is it timely?– Does it offer value for money?– Is the applicant competent to undertake project?– If you had to, why would you reject it?

Page 7: Phil Ward Research Funding Manager University of Kent

Reasons for Rejection

• Too high risk/leftfield• Too safe/incremental/discipline-specific• Too expensive (for either the research question or the

agency)• Too modest• Too applied• Too theoretical• The methods/objectives are inappropriate• The timeframe is unrealistic• Insufficiently qualified research team• Other (please specify below)

Page 8: Phil Ward Research Funding Manager University of Kent

RCUK Applications

Page 9: Phil Ward Research Funding Manager University of Kent

RCUK Awards

Page 10: Phil Ward Research Funding Manager University of Kent

RCUK Success Rates

Page 11: Phil Ward Research Funding Manager University of Kent

Contact Details

Phil Ward• 01227 827748• [email protected]• http://fundermental.blogspot.com• http://twitter.com/frootle