Ultrasonic Phased Array Procedures for Rapid Inspection of Piping Welds

1014656

WARNING: Please read the Export Control Agreement on the back cover.

Effective December 6, 2006, this report has been made publicly available in accordance with Section 734.3(b)(3) and published in accordance with Section 734.7 of the U.S. Export Administration Regulations. As a result of this publication, this report is subject to only copyright protection and does not require any license agreement from EPRI. This notice supersedes the export control restrictions and any proprietary licensed material notices embedded in the document prior to publication.

ELECTRIC POWER RESEARCH INSTITUTE 3420 Hillview Avenue, Palo Alto, California 94304-1338 ▪ PO Box 10412, Palo Alto, California 94303-0813 ▪ USA

800.313.3774 ▪ 650.855.2121 ▪ askepri@epri.com ▪ www.epri.com

Ultrasonic Phased Array Procedures for Rapid Inspection of Piping Welds

1014656

Technical Update, December 2006

EPRI Project Managers

D. MacDonald M. Dennis J. Landrum

G. Selby

DISCLAIMER OF WARRANTIES AND LIMITATION OF LIABILITIES

THIS DOCUMENT WAS PREPARED BY THE ORGANIZATION(S) NAMED BELOW AS AN ACCOUNT OF WORK SPONSORED OR COSPONSORED BY THE ELECTRIC POWER RESEARCH INSTITUTE, INC. (EPRI). NEITHER EPRI, ANY MEMBER OF EPRI, ANY COSPONSOR, THE ORGANIZATION(S) BELOW, NOR ANY PERSON ACTING ON BEHALF OF ANY OF THEM:

(A) MAKES ANY WARRANTY OR REPRESENTATION WHATSOEVER, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, (I) WITH RESPECT TO THE USE OF ANY INFORMATION, APPARATUS, METHOD, PROCESS, OR SIMILAR ITEM DISCLOSED IN THIS DOCUMENT, INCLUDING MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, OR (II) THAT SUCH USE DOES NOT INFRINGE ON OR INTERFERE WITH PRIVATELY OWNED RIGHTS, INCLUDING ANY PARTY'S INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, OR (III) THAT THIS DOCUMENT IS SUITABLE TO ANY PARTICULAR USER'S CIRCUMSTANCE; OR

(B) ASSUMES RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY DAMAGES OR OTHER LIABILITY WHATSOEVER (INCLUDING ANY CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES, EVEN IF EPRI OR ANY EPRI REPRESENTATIVE HAS BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES) RESULTING FROM YOUR SELECTION OR USE OF THIS DOCUMENT OR ANY INFORMATION, APPARATUS, METHOD, PROCESS, OR SIMILAR ITEM DISCLOSED IN THIS DOCUMENT.

ORGANIZATION(S) THAT PREPARED THIS DOCUMENT

Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI)

This is an EPRI Technical Update report. A Technical Update report is intended as an informal report of continuing research, a meeting, or a topical study. It is not a final EPRI technical report.

NOTE

For further information about EPRI, call the EPRI Customer Assistance Center at 800.313.3774 or e-mail askepri@epri.com.

Electric Power Research Institute and EPRI are registered service marks of the Electric Power Research Institute, Inc.

Copyright © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.

iii

CITATIONS This document was prepared by

Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) Nondestructive Evaluation (NDE) Center 1300 W.T. Harris Blvd. Charlotte, NC 28262

Principal Investigators D. MacDonald M. Dennis J. Landrum G. Selby

This document describes research sponsored by EPRI.

This publication is a corporate document that should be cited in the literature in the following manner:

Ultrasonic Phased Array Procedures for Rapid Inspection of Piping Welds, EPRI, Palo Alto, CA: 2006. 1014656

v

ABSTRACT In 2001, EPRI NDE Center personnel successfully completed an Appendix VIII qualification of an automated phased array ultrasonic examination procedure for flaw detection and length sizing in austenitic and ferritic piping welds. As demonstrated by the EPRI team, a phased array approach to piping examinations offers improvements in speed, coverage, and reliability. These improvements have the potential of lowering the costs and increasing the confidence in piping examinations by reducing qualification costs, radiation exposure, need for re-scans, and repairs. The automated phased array procedure was further enhanced in 2003, as the EPRI NDE Center reduced this similar metal weld piping examination technique from three to one phased array probe. This single phased array probe approach was successfully qualified through the Performance Demonstrative Initiative in 2004. The qualified procedure and supporting documents can be found in the appendices of this report.

vii

CONTENTS

1 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................1-1

2 QUALIFICATION OF AUTOMATED PHASED ARRAY UT FOR SIMILAR-METAL PIPING WELDS ......................................................................................................................................2-1

Phased Array Probe.............................................................................................................2-1 Circumferential Flaws...........................................................................................................2-2 Axial Flaws...........................................................................................................................2-5 EPRI NDE Center Appendix VIII Qualification .....................................................................2-7 Phased Array Procedure Commercialization .......................................................................2-9

3 SINGLE PHASED ARRAY PROBE FOR PIPING .................................................................3-1 Preliminary Activities ............................................................................................................3-1 Detection and Length Sizing Results ...................................................................................3-7

4 SUMMARY .............................................................................................................................4-1

5 REFERENCES .......................................................................................................................5-1

A PROCEDURE FOR AUTOMATED SINGLE PHASED-ARRAY PROBE ULTRASONIC FLAW DETECTION AND LENGTH SIZING IN AUSTENITIC AND FERRITIC PIPING WELDS (EPRI-SPA-1) ........................................................................................................................... A-1

List 1 - Material & Examination Thickness Ranges............................................................. A-4 List 2- Phased Array System Hardware List ....................................................................... A-6 List 3 Phased Array Transducer Essential Variables .......................................................... A-7 List 4 Phased Array Wedge Essential Parameters ............................................................. A-8 List 5 Phased Array Focal Laws.......................................................................................... A-9 List 6- Material Velocities .................................................................................................. A-19 List 7 Line Scan Examinations .......................................................................................... A-23

B APPENDIX ............................................................................................................................ B-1

C APPENDIX ............................................................................................................................ C-1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... C-1 Experiments ........................................................................................................................ C-2 Conclusions......................................................................................................................... C-5 Recommendations .............................................................................................................. C-5

ix

LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1-1 Probe Motion for Line Scan Technique ....................................................................1-1 Figure 2-1 Examination Volume (A-B-C-D) for Pipe Weld Inspection........................................2-1 Figure 2-2 Phased Array Probe Scan Pattern for Circumferential Flaws...................................2-2 Figure 2-3 Phased Array Probe Scan Pattern for Circumferential Flaws...................................2-3 Figure 2-4 Phased Array Probe Configuration for Circumferential Flaws ..................................2-3 Figure 2-5 Phased Array Imaging of Circumferential IGSCC ....................................................2-4 Figure 2-6 Phased Array Probe/Wedge Design for Axial Flaws (Counter-Clockwise Scan)......2-5 Figure 2-7 Phased Array Probe Counter-Clockwise Scan Pattern for Axial Flaws....................2-6 Figure 2-8 Phased Array Probe Clockwise Scan Pattern for Axial Flaws..................................2-6 Figure 2-9 Phased Array Image of Axial IGSCC........................................................................2-7 Figure 2-10 Phased Array Approach to Similar Metal Pipe Weld Examinations........................2-8 Figure 3-1 Phased Array Probe/Wedge for Circumferential and Axial Flaws ............................3-2 Figure 3-2 Austenitic Weld Sample Containing EDM Notches ..................................................3-3 Figure 3-3 Shear Wave Ultrasonic Image (Circumferential & Axial EDM Notches) ...................3-4 Figure 3-4 Shear Wave Ultrasonic Image (Circumferential & Axial Flaws)................................3-5 Figure 3-5 Longitudinal Wave Ultrasonic Image (Circumferential Flaws) ..................................3-6 Figure 3-6 Drawing of 12-inch Austenitic Pipe Sample..............................................................3-7 Figure 3-7 Axial Flaw E Detection Results (-45° and + 45° Skew Angles) ................................3-8 Figure 3-8 Axial Flaw F Detection Results (-45° and + 45° Skew Angles).................................3-8 Figure 3-9 Circumferential Flaw B Detection & Length Sizing Results (40° to 70° Beam Angles)...................................................................................................................................................3-9 Figure 3-10 Circumferential Flaw C Detection & Length Sizing Results (40° to 70° Beam Angles).................................................................................................................................................3-10

xi

LIST OF TABLES Table 2-1 Probe for Automated Phased Array Examination of Pipe Welds...............................2-1 Table 3-1 Circumferential Flaw Length Sizing Results ............................................................3-12

1-1

1 INTRODUCTION The objective of the EPRI NDE Center phased array program is to exploit the benefits of increased speed, coverage, and accuracy afforded by this technology. To implement this objective, EPRI is assisting NDE service providers by developing and qualifying phased array procedures.

The phased array approach enables acoustic beam steering and focusing. An “array” is a type of ultrasonic transducer that has been segmented into many individual, parallel elements. Each element is operated independently. By controlling the timing, or “phase”, of each element’s excitation, a single array probe can be made to simulate many different conventional probes. In this manner, a region of a component may be scanned electronically in milliseconds instead of scanned mechanically in a few seconds.

Conventional automated UT procedures employ at least five scans on each side of the weld to detect both circumferential and axial flaws. Phased array technology offers a means to reduce the scanning time by simplifying the scan pattern. Instead of the slow, two-dimensional “raster scan” pattern necessary to scan a weld joint using conventional methods, the phased array probe may simply be scanned along the length of the weld in a “line scan” pattern to achieve similar results (see Figure 1-1).

Figure 1-1 Probe Motion for Line Scan Technique

2-1

2 QUALIFICATION OF AUTOMATED PHASED ARRAY UT FOR SIMILAR-METAL PIPING WELDS The EPRI NDE Center has developed automated phased array UT techniques to examine pipe welds. The key advantage of automated inspection is that all the waveforms are recorded, along with the transducer position for each waveform, so that imaging software can produce three-dimensional views of the data volume. These views are the most powerful tools for accurate interpretation of the data and also allow the data to be viewed at any time after the inspection.

Figure 2-1 shows the required examination volume (rectangle, A-B-C-D) for pipe weld inspection.

Figure 2-1 Examination Volume (A-B-C-D) for Pipe Weld Inspection

Phased Array Probe

EPRI’s phased array procedure for detection and length sizing in similar-metal piping welds is based on 4 x 7 1.5 MHz array probes. The array is configured for use with interchangeable plastic wedges. Table 2-1 gives the number of array elements, the frequency, and the relative size of this probe.

Table 2-1 Probe for Automated Phased Array Examination of Pipe Welds

Elements Frequency (MHz) Aperture Size

4 x 7 1.5 12 mm x 20 mm

(0.472-inch x 0.787-inch)

2-2

Circumferential Flaws

For circumferential flaws, two 4 x 7 arrays are mounted on a dual, side-by-side wedge for suppression of internal wedge echoes. The wedge is optimized for production of shear waves. A dual, longitudinal-wave wedge is also used when access is available from only one side of a stainless steel weld.

Probe skewing has been found to be a useful discriminator between intergranular stress corrosion cracking (IGSCC) and geometry responses in conventional ultrasonic inspection. The 4 x 7 arrays provide electronic beam skewing, as well as, beam angle steering. The arrays were used to steer the beam angle between 40° and 70°, in 1°-increments (a sector scan) and skew this fan of beams at three distinct angles: -15°, 0°, and +15° (see Figure 2-2). Additional higher- and lower-gain sector scans at 0° skew are performed to enhance dynamic range.

Figure 2-2 Phased Array Probe Scan Pattern for Circumferential Flaws

The position and number of phased array line scans performed to examine a weld is a function of the amount of coverage desired and range of angles in the sector scan (40° to 70° probe angles, in this case). A two-line scan approach was adopted and found to provide adequate information. The axial positions of the scan lines are determined by the pipe wall thickness and weld crown width to provide examination angles of about 45° to 55° in the examination volume (see Figure 2-3).

Weld

Probe

CL

2-3

Figure 2-3 Phased Array Probe Scan Pattern for Circumferential Flaws

The small footprint dual array probe (see Figure 2-4) was used to acquire a total of 125 A-scans at each probe position. This approach proved effective for detecting all the circumferential flaws in the qualification sample set including field-removed IGSCC.

Figure 2-4 Phased Array Probe Configuration for Circumferential Flaws

2-4

Figure 2-5 shows the phased array ultrasonic images from a practice specimen containing circumferential IGSCC.

Figure 2-5 Phased Array Imaging of Circumferential IGSCC

2-5

Axial Flaws

For detection of axial flaws, the phase array approach closely mimics the most successful conventional techniques, that is scanning the beam index point as close as possible to the weld crown with at least two different probe skews. A single 4 x 7 array is mounted on a wedge designed to direct shear waves toward the weld root at about a 50° counter-clockwise skew. The array is mounted with its long, 7-element axis nominally parallel with the weld, so that the center of the acoustic footprint on the pipe surface is as close as possible to the weld crown toe (see Figure 2-6).

Figure 2-6 Phased Array Probe/Wedge Design for Axial Flaws (Counter-Clockwise Scan)

A second 4 x 7 array is mounted on a similar wedge that is cut to look clockwise. The wedge design allows the array to interrogate the weld with limited sector scans at five different probe skew angles, using a total of 55 beam angle/skew angle combinations. Two scan strokes are performed. The first stroke is positioned to provide optimum detection of flaws located very near the weld root, and the second is optimized for flaws near the front of the examination volume (see Figures 2-7 and 2-8).

2-6

Weld

Probe

CL

Figure 2-7 Phased Array Probe Counter-Clockwise Scan Pattern for Axial Flaws

Weld

Probe

CL

Figure 2-8 Phased Array Probe Clockwise Scan Pattern for Axial Flaws

The successful Appendix VIII qualification demonstrated the effectiveness of this approach for detecting for a range of misoriented axial flaws in austenitic pipe welds including field-removed IGSCC.

Figure 2-9 shows the phased array ultrasonic images from an axial IGSCC.

2-7

Figure 2-9 Phased Array Image of Axial IGSCC

EPRI NDE Center Appendix VIII Qualification

EPRI has documented the successful Appendix VIII qualification of a single procedure for phased array examination of ferritic, austenitic (non-IGSCC) and austenitic (IGSCC) pipe welds for flaw detection and length sizing [1]. This procedure covers pipe diameters from 305 to 1270 mm (12 to 50 inches) and thicknesses from 12 to 127 mm (0.5 to 5.0 inches).

The phased array approach uses 1.5 MHz 2D array probes that enable acoustic beam steering and skewing. The qualified procedure uses three separate probes (two looking circumferentially and one looking axially). Each probe is scanned parallel to the weld using rapid two-stroke line scans on each side of the weld (see Figure 2-10). The axial position of the probes is determined from wall thickness and weld crown width.

2-8

Figure 2-10 Phased Array Approach to Similar Metal Pipe Weld Examinations

This procedure was successfully qualified through the Performance Demonstration Initiative (PDI). EPRI personnel performed the qualification. In addition to providing excellent information about the effectiveness of the technique, the qualification gave PDI its first experience on how to qualify a phased array procedure that takes full advantage of electronic beam steering and skewing. PDI had qualified phased array procedures before, but those procedures used arrays to generate only a few beam angles (mimicking several conventional probes) and used conventional, detailed raster scan patterns. The EPRI procedure uses over 200 beam/skew directions, with a very limited line scan pattern, so there was a learning curve on how to deal with the quite different set of essential variables. The EPRI procedure poses some new qualification problems. Several technical justifications were prepared in order to address them.

With normal wear and tear, individual array elements will cease to function. This can be the result of failure of connections within the array, failure of cables, or failure of individual channels within the phased array instrument. In order for the qualification to be valid for a somewhat degraded array probe, cable, or system, the qualification was performed with some of the elements – about 25% of them - deliberately turned off.

Experiments were performed to determine the effect of disabling different random selections of elements and the effect of disabling a worst-case selection of elements. No significant difference in performance was found between the selections of elements to turn off. The only significant effect was the loss of a few dB of sensitivity according to the loss of active area. No selection of disabled elements had a significant effect on detection and location of flaw indications.

Conventional procedures require measurement of the index point and beam angle for each probe that is used. For this procedure, it would not be practical to measure the index and angle for each of the over 200 beam directions that it uses. Instead, calibration is performed using the recorded sector-scan display from reference reflectors, such as side-drilled holes and verification that the depths of the holes are imaged correctly. In this way, a few of the beam angles are verified, and if they are as they should be, then all the other angles should be correct as well. Anything that would affect one beam angle – modification of the wedge, for example – will affect all.

2-9

The purpose of the reference sensitivity is to facilitate the comparison of an indication’s amplitude between two observations that might be years apart. It would not be practical to establish separate reference sensitivity for each beam angle and skew. Instead, the reference sensitivity is measured for one selected beam angle for each array/wedge combination. This is sufficient because any difference between inspections that would affect the sensitivity of one beam angle would affect all the others in the same way.

EPRI has prepared software tools that form a part of the procedure. These tools are also specific to the R/D Tech FOCUS system and TomoView software. One of the tools (EPRI Phased Array Toolkit) calculates the focal laws, or phase programming, that the instrument will use to generate the proper beam angles and skews for the examination. The other tool (EPRI Piping Phased Array Workbook) generates the scan plan, calibration sheets, and examination report sheets for each inspection.

Phased Array Procedure Commercialization

EPRI moved quickly with utility advisors and vendors to make phased array technology commercially available. This was based on the success of the phased array ultrasonic Appendix VIII qualification for piping [1]. Commercialization was accomplished by coordinating the phase array technique development with a vendor, so that when the technique was ready, the vendor would be ready to deliver it. EPRI assisted a vendor in expanding the procedure to fit their field examination requirements. Notably, extending the diameter range down to 102mm (4-inch), the thickness range down to 6mm (0.237 inch), and the cable length out to 100m (300-foot). Commercial phased array pipe examination inspection services are now available and are being applied (Peach Bottom, Fall 2002; Japan, Spring 2003). In addition, this technique has been used for a basis in developing manual phased array procedures for piping.

3-1

3 SINGLE PHASED ARRAY PROBE FOR PIPING

Preliminary Activities

Recently, EPRI NDE Center staff developed and qualified through the Performance Demonstrative Initiative (PDI) an automated inspection technique for the detection and length sizing of IGSCC and non-IGSCC in ferritic and austenitic piping welds using ultrasonic phased array technology with three two-dimensional piezoelectric phased array probes. This technique utilized the advantage of the two-dimensional phased array transducers in order to electronically generate the multiple beam and skew angles, which would ordinarily be accomplished mechanically using conventional ultrasonic methods. Using the multiple beam and skew angles also made it possible to replace the conventional raster scan pattern with a faster line scan pattern parallel to the weld. After successfully qualifying a three-probe phased array technique, the next objective is to develop and qualify a single probe phased array technique for the examination of circumferential and axial flaws in piping welds which performs the same functions as the previous technique but in an overall faster and simpler manner.

The single ultrasonic phased array probe for examining circumferential and axial flaws in piping welds is made up of 2D piezoelectric arrays. In addition, multiple wedges contoured for outside pipe diameters ranging from 101.6mm (4-inch) to 1270mm (50-inch) will be manufactured to cover a large range of pipe sizes. (Figure 3-1) These probe/wedge combinations make it possible to generate and inspect with both longitudinal and shear waves without additional wedges or acquisition setups.

3-2

Figure 3-1 Phased Array Probe/Wedge for Circumferential and Axial Flaws

3-3

In order to investigate the functionality of the single phased array probe, an austenitic weld sample containing circumferential and axially-oriented inside surface connected EDM notches (5 mm height) was examined with multiple line scans using shear wave beam angles from 40° to 60° and skew angles from ±15° to ±80° (Figures 3-2 and 3-3).

Figure 3-2 Austenitic Weld Sample Containing EDM Notches

3-4

Figure 3-3 Shear Wave Ultrasonic Image (Circumferential & Axial EDM Notches)

R/D Tech’s TomoView software was used to combine the contributions from these 200 angles into merged images based on signal amplitude. Figure 3-3 illustrates merged volume corrected “VC-Top (C)” and “VC-Side (B)” views showing all fifteen indications in the austenitic EDM notch sample. The vertical (green) and horizontal (blue) axes shown in the “VC-Top” view are the directions perpendicular and parallel to the circumferential weld respectively. As can be seen in the “VC-Top” image above, the EDM notches are placed at various axial locations from the centerline of the weld that results in a “V” shape for ten axial notches positioned closest to the circumferential notch. The “VC-Side” view in Figure 3-3 shows the indications around the circumference (blue axis) and throughout the thickness (purple axis) of the pipe. In both the “VC-Top” and “VC-Side” images, the ultrasonic responses from the notches skewed ±80° produced the lowest amplitude, however, the signal-to-noise ratio is adequate for detection.

3-5

A different austenitic weld sample containing fabricated (non-IGSCC) flaws was also used to test the functionality of the single probe technique using two line scans with shear wave beam angles from 40° to 60°; skew angles from ±15° to ±68°; longitudinal wave beam angles from 40° to 65°; and skew angles from –15° to +15° (Figures 3-4 & 3-5).

Figure 3-4 Shear Wave Ultrasonic Image (Circumferential & Axial Flaws)

3-6

Figure 3-5 Longitudinal Wave Ultrasonic Image (Circumferential Flaws)

Figure 3-4 shows the volume corrected merged “VC-Top” and “VC-Side” shear wave ultrasonic images from the austenitic weld sample containing one far-side circumferential flaw, two near-side circumferential flaws, and one near-side axially oriented flaw. Furthermore, ultrasonic responses from the weld root and reflections in the wedge can also be seen in the images. This wedge noise should be significantly reduced with the addition of damping material incorporated in the next wedge design revision. Figure 3-5 shows the volume corrected merged “VC-Top” and “VC-Side” longitudinal wave ultrasonic images from the same austenitic weld sample. This data was collected using an additional channel in the same acquisition setup file. The longitudinal wave beam angles serve as confirmation of the far side flaw detection shown in the shear wave data.

These preliminary results provide reassurance that the single probe/wedge design is capable of detecting both circumferentially and axially-oriented flaws in piping welds. The ultrasonic images shown in Figures 3-3 through 3-5 are comparable to the results from the original three-probe technique.

3-7

Detection and Length Sizing Results

The results from the preliminary activities were used to refine the ultrasonic settings and essential parameters of the automated single probe phased array technique. These refinements included slight changes in the inspection angles and the selection of the worst-case selection of elements to deactivate for the PDI demonstration.

A 304.8 mm (12-inch) OD, 17.1 mm (0.674-inch) thick austenitic pipe sample containing fabricated circumferential and axial defects of various lengths and heights was examined using the updated phased array procedure. A drawing of this pipe specimen can be found in Figure 3-6. Figures 3-7 and 3-8 show successful axial flaw detections in the “VC-Side” view using the -45° and +45° shear wave skew angles for flaws “E“ and “F” respectively. No effort was made to size these defects as length sizing of axial flaws is not a requirement of the PDI qualification process for piping. Utilizing shear wave beam angles from 40° to 70°, satisfactory detection and length sizing evaluations for the circumferential cracks are illustrated in Figures 3-9 through 3-12 for flaws “B”, “C”, “D”, and “A”. Table 3-1 presents the length sizing measurements and the associated errors for the circumferential flaws. The largest error of 9.58 mm (0.377-inch) was observed for circumferential Flaw “D”. The root mean of the squared error (RMS) for length sizing over these four circumferential defects was only 6.87 mm (0.270-inch).

Figure 3-6 Drawing of 12-inch Austenitic Pipe Sample

3-8

Figure 3-7 Axial Flaw E Detection Results (-45° and + 45° Skew Angles)

Figure 3-8 Axial Flaw F Detection Results (-45° and + 45° Skew Angles)

-45° Skew Detection

-45° Skew Detection

+45° SkewDetection

+45° Skew Detection

3-9

Figure 3-9 Circumferential Flaw B Detection & Length Sizing Results (40° to 70° Beam Angles)

3-10

Figure 3-10 Circumferential Flaw C Detection & Length Sizing Results (40° to 70° Beam Angles)

3-11

Figure 3-11. Circumferential Flaw D Detection & Length Sizing Results (40° to 70° Beam Angles)

3-12

Figure 3-12. Circumferential Flaw A Detection & Length Sizing Results (40° to 70° Beam Angles)

Table 3-1 Circumferential Flaw Length Sizing Results

Flaw True Length (mm)

True Length

(in)

Measured Length

(mm)

Measured Length

(in)

Length Error (mm)

Length Error (in)

B 89.63 3.529 97.00 3.819 7.37 0.290

C 145.16 5.715 148.67 5.853 3.50 0.138

D 42.44 1.671 52.02 2.048 9.58 0.377

A 39.49 1.555 45.01 1.772 5.52 0.217

RMS Length Error = 6.87 mm (0.270 in) These detection and length sizing results on fabricated flaws using the automated single-probe phased array procedure were acceptable. This technique has been finalized and the procedure was successfully qualified through PDI for ferritic and austenitic similar metal weld piping, including IGSCC for nominal outside pipe diameters of 152.4 mm (6-inch) and greater in 2004. The qualified procedure and supporting documents can be found in the appendices of this report.

4-1

4 SUMMARY Phased array UT technologies have been applied to improve pipe weld inspection speed and reliability. PDI qualifications now exist for phased array examination of ferritic piping and austenitic piping. An ISI vendor is currently using EPRI automated phased array pipe weld examination technology at various power plants. EPRI NDE Center sponsors are benefiting from availability of qualified phased array procedures. EPRI has reduced the inspection time of its automated phased array examination procedure for piping by combining the functions of the qualified three-probe procedure into a single probe technique. In 2004 this enhanced single probe technique was successfully demonstrated through the PDI process for the detection and length sizing of flaws (including IGSCC) in similar metal piping welds. EPRI is currently seeking vendor collaboration of this efficient array technology for field implementation.

5-1

5 REFERENCES

1. D. MacDonald Phased Array Ultrasound Piping Examination Procedure. EPRI Technical Report 1006980. October 2002.

2. J. Landrum M. Dennis, G. Selby, and D. MacDonald. Procedure for Automated Single Phased-Array Probe Ultrasonic Flaw Detection and Length Sizing in Ferritic and Austenitic Piping Welds (EPRI-SPA-1). August 2004.

A-1

A PROCEDURE FOR AUTOMATED SINGLE PHASED-ARRAY PROBE ULTRASONIC FLAW DETECTION AND LENGTH SIZING IN AUSTENITIC AND FERRITIC PIPING WELDS (EPRI-SPA-1)

A-3

PROCEDURE FOR AUTOMATED SINGLE PHASED-ARRAY PROBE ULTRASONIC

FLAW DETECTION AND LENGTH SIZING IN FERRITIC AND AUSTENITIC PIPING

WELDS (EPRI-SPA-1) Approved by: _____________________________________ _____________________________________ _____________________________________ _____________________________________

A-4

1. SCOPE

1.1. This procedure defines the method and requirements for contact, automated phased array ultrasonic examination of full penetration piping butt welds and adjacent base materials from the Outside Diameter (OD) surface.

1.2. This procedure is applicable to the diameter and thickness ranges for austenitic stainless steel

and ferritic carbon steel materials as listed below. This includes austenitic stainless steel piping systems susceptible to intergranular stress corrosion cracking (IGSCC).

List 1 - Material & Examination Thickness Ranges

Material Diameter Range Thickness Range

PDI Demonstration Field Applicability PDI

Demonstration Field Applicability

Wrought Austenitic

6” NPS to 36.0"

6” NPS and

Greater

0.432” to 2.625"

0.332” to 3.125"

Ferritic

6” NPS to 50.0"

6” NPS and

Greater

0.432” to 3.85"

0.332” to 4.85"

1.3. The techniques described within this procedure address the detection and length sizing of

discontinuities within the examination volume. Depth sizing is not addressed. 1.4. Where dual side access is available, examinations shall always be performed from both sides

of the weld. Where dual side access is not possible, the examination shall be performed from a single side of the weld.

1.5. The weld crown condition may be mechanically conditioned or in the "as-welded" condition.

1.6. This procedure has been demonstrated in accordance with the requirements of the American

Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Code, Section XI, Appendix VIII, 1995 Edition with Addenda through 2000, as modified the Performance Demonstration Initiative (PDI) program description. This demonstration was also conducted in accordance with the requirements of the Federal Register, Part II, Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 10 CFR Part 50, Industry Codes and Standards; Amended Requirements; Final Rule, Dated 26 September, 2002.

1.7. This procedure is qualified for;

1.7.1. Detection and length sizing of circumferentially oriented flaw indications in austenitic and

ferritic material where dual side access is available or if the flaw indications are located on the near side of a single side access configuration.

1.7.2. Detection and length sizing of circumferentially oriented flaw indications in ferritic material

where only single side access is available.

1.7.3. Detection of axially oriented flaws in austenitic and ferritic material where dual side access is available or if the flaw indications are located on the near side of a single side access configuration

A-5

1.8. This procedure is not qualified for;

1.8.1. Detection or length sizing of circumferentially oriented flaw indications in austenitic material when only single side access is available and the flaw is located on the far side of the weld, however guidance is provided. The techniques identified in this procedure have been demonstrated to be representative of “best effort" technology for single side detection of far side defects parallel to the weld.

1.8.2. Length sizing axially oriented flaws regardless of location.

2. REFERENCES

2.1. American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section XI, including Appendix VIII, 1995 Edition with the 2000 Addenda of Appendix VIII.

2.2. Receipt Inspection of Single Phased Array Probe Transducer and Wedges for Piping Welds.

A White Paper in support of Procedure for Automated Phased Array Ultrasonic Flaw Detection and Length Sizing in Austenitic And Ferritic Piping Welds (EPRI-SPA-1). EPRI NDE Center, October 2003.

2.3. Effect of De-activating Some of the Elements of a Phased Array Probe. A White Paper in

support of Procedure for Automated Single Phased-Array Probe Ultrasonic Flaw Detection and Length Sizing in Ferritic and Austenitic Piping Welds (EPRI-SPA-1). EPRI NDE Center, October 2003.

2.4. Reference Sensitivity Measurement and Recording for Phased Array Pipe Inspection. A

White Paper in support of Procedure for Automated Phased Array Ultrasonic Flaw Detection and Length Sizing in Austenitic And Ferritic Piping Welds (EPRI-PA-1). EPRI NDE Center, October 2001.

2.5. EPRI Phased Array Toolkit V1.0 User Manual. EPRI NDE Center, September 2001.

2.6. EPRI Piping Single Phased Array Probe Workbook User Manual. EPRI NDE Center, October

2003. 3. PERSONNEL

3.1. Personnel performing examinations, reviewing and evaluating recorded data to this procedure shall be certified to Level II or III in accordance with their employers’ written certification program.

3.2. Data acquisition operators do not require PDI qualifications. Data acquisition operators can

perform ultrasonic calibrations; however, qualified data analysis personnel shall perform validation of calibration and examination essential parameters.

3.3. Data analysis personnel shall have current PDI qualification status for the material type,

diameter, thickness, and access limitation (if any) for the component being examined. Qualification ranges and limitations are listed on the Performance Demonstration Qualification Summary (PDQS) for each qualified individual. Qualified data analysis personnel are responsible for assuring that all acquired data meets the technique requirements and quality standards specified within this procedure.

3.4. Personnel, whose involvement is limited to mounting tracks, positioning the automatic scanner

or verifying transducer position, etc., need not be certified.

A-6

4. EQUIPMENT

4.1. Ultrasonic Instrument

4.1.1. The R/D Tech digitized ultrasonic data acquisition and analysis system with TomoView Version 2.2 Revision Q14. Later revisions of the software shall also be considered equivalent if they contain, as a minimum, the same data merging tools and image views as described within this procedure and the revision has been validated through R/D Tech’s software configuration control process. That process must contain provisions to assure that no change has been made to any of the parameters that have an affect on the sensitivity and accuracy of the signal amplitude and time outputs of the software whether displayed, recorded, or automatically processed. This also applies to addition of mathematical modules, which aid the data analysis with positioning flaws and adjusting for geometric configurations.

4.1.2. The R/D Tech digitized ultrasonic data acquisition equipment shall be utilized. The

system consists of the hardware named in List 2 below. If the essential variable hardware is substituted, the provisions of ASME Section XI, Appendix VIII-4110 must be met.

List 2- Phased Array System Hardware List

Essential Nonessential Description Model Number

X TomoScan III/PA, Manufacturer: R/D-Tech X Pulser Card EQUX114C X Piggy Pulser/Receiver Card EWUX-203E X Delay Receiver Card EQUX167B X Delay Piggy Card EQUX169B X Back Plane Card X Mother Card X CPU Card X MIM Card RS422 X MIM Clock Card X Interface board µTomo X PIM Hyper / Hyper Pim 03 X Voltage Switcher X µ TOMO board X µ TOMO : VxWorks X FOCUS : VxWorks X Data Acquisition computer (PC) and external

storage device

X Scanner with appropriate search unit gimbals X Non-ultrasonic cabling, including network cables

and umbilical cable

Note: Revision letters in some cases can be instrument specific.

A-7

4.1.1 Lists 9A through 9K and Lists 10A through 10F identify the essential and non-

essential instrument settings. Essential settings are mandatory and shall be set as indicated. No adjustments to the nonessential ultrasonic parameters can be made without the knowledge and concurrence of the qualified Data Analyst.

4.2. Ultrasonic Phased Array Transducers

4.2.1. This procedure utilizes arrays that use a minimum of 28 elements arranged in a two-dimensional (2D) matrix. Single array configurations (pulse-echo) are used for the detection of axial flaws. Dual array configurations (pitch-catch) are for the detection of circumferential flaws. Figure 1 provides further detail.

4.2.2. The phased array transducers that have been qualified for examinations are listed in the

applicable PDI Table 1 document for this procedure.

4.2.3. Replacement phased array transducers of the same manufacturer, model number, number and arrangement of elements, element sizes, element spacing, element shapes, and nominal frequency (i.e., different serial number) may be used without re-qualification. Replacement transducers not of the same manufacture, that are of the same number and arrangement of elements, element sizes, element spacing, and frequency may be used providing the provisions of ASME Section XI, Appendix VIII-4110 are met.

4.2.4. Phased array transducer essential parameters are identified in List 3.

List 3 Phased Array Transducer Essential Variables

Element Axis Element Axis Manf. Model Freq. No. of Element Element Element Element Element

Number Elements Arrangement Length (MM)

Spacing(MM)

Width (MM)

Spacing (MM)

Agfa 115-000-206 1.5 MHz 56 7x8 2.25 2.30 1.35 1.40

A-8

Figure 1 Phased Array Transducers

4.3. Phased Array Transducer Wedges

4.3.1. Phased array transducer wedges allow for the formation of several beam angles and beam skews simultaneously. Wedges are typically cut two-dimensionally, with one dimension (wedge cut) controlling the refracted angle(s) produced and the other dimension (roof angle) affecting beam focusing or skewing capabilities.

4.3.2. The phased array transducer wedges that have been qualified for examinations are listed

in the applicable PDI Table 1 document for this procedure.

4.3.3. Replacement wedges of the same manufacturer, model, number, material, angles, and dimensions may be used without re-qualification. Replacement wedges not of the same manufacture, that are of the same material, angles, and dimensions may be used providing the provisions of ASME Section XI, Appendix VIII-4110 are met.

4.3.4. Transducer wedge essential parameters are identified in List 4.

List 4 Phased Array Wedge Essential Parameters

Manf.

Model Wedge Cut RoofContour Beam Flaw Type Config.

Primary Number Angle Angle (OD)

(Note 1)Direction (Figure 9)

Wedge Design

Agfa 360-151-019 30° 0° Flat UPST or DNST Circ/Axial Dual/ Single 45° Shear

Agfa 360-152-004 30° 0° 36” NPS UPST or DNST Circ/Axial Dual/ Single 45° Shear

Agfa 360-152-005 30° 0° 20” NPS UPST or DNST Circ/Axial Dual/ Single 45° Shear

Agfa 360-152-006 30° 0° 12” NPS UPST or DNST Circ/Axial Dual/ Single 45° Shear

Agfa 360-152-007 30° 0° 6” NPS UPST or DNST Circ/Axial Dual/ Single 45° Shear

Note 1: Flat transducer wedges shall be used on components greater than 50” in diameter. The 36” NPS wedges shall be used on components greater than or equal to 35” in diameter. The 20” NPS wedges shall be used on components greater than 16” in diameter. The 12” NPS wedges shall be used on components greater than 8” in diameter. The 6” NPS wedges shall be used on 6” NPS piping. The preceding should be used as a guide in determining the appropriate wedge to be used for a particular pipe size. For each examination the wedge that best matches the outside diameter of the pipe should be used.

A-9

4.4. Phased Array Focal Laws

4.4.1. A phased array focal law is a group of parameters (gains, delays, skews, filters, etc.) applied simultaneously by the Tomoscan III/PA system during pulse transmission and reception to create a desired beam in the material. The timing of the elements' excitation can be individually controlled to produce certain desired effects, such as multiple examination angles or steering the beam axis. A single focal law typically generates a single beam angle. Combining several focal laws creates a focal law “group”. Figure 2 provides further detail.

4.4.2. The phased array focal law groups that have been qualified for examinations in

accordance with this procedure are identified in List 5.

List 5 Phased Array Focal Laws

Focal Law

Group

Beam Direction Beam

Angles

Minimum Beam Angle

Resolution Skews Mode UT Channel

Name/# UT Channel #

1a UPST or DNST

40° - 70° 1° 0°, -15°, +15° Shear Wave 4070S 1

1b UPST or DNST

43° - 70° 1° 0°, -15°, +15° Longitudinal Wave

4370L 4

2 LKLT 35° - 60° 2.5° -35°,-45°, -52.5°, -60°, -67.5

Shear Wave Left 3560S 2

3 LKRT 35° - 60° 2.5° 35°, 45°, 52.5°, 60°, 67.5°

Shear Wave Right 3560S 3

A-10

Figure 2 Phased Array Focal Laws

4.5. Mounting phased array transducers

4.5.1. The arrays are positioned so that the first element of each array is located at the rear of the wedge and is the furthest element from the center of the cork in the lateral direction. (see Figure 3)

Figure 3 Array Placements

A-11

4.6. Ultrasonic cable configurations

4.6.1. The cable type, maximum length, and maximum number of intermediate connectors are specified in Figure 4 and in applicable Table 1 document for this procedure. The maximum cable length identified may be exceeded by a length of 1-meter (3.3’) to allow for cable manufacturing tolerances.

4.6.2. Phased Array Transducer Cable (Integral)

a. Hypertronics 160-pin male connector b. Length: 10 meters (~ 33’)

4.6.3. Extension Cables

a. Two Hypertronics 160-pin male to 160-pin female, 64 RG-178 b. Length: each 44.5 meters (~146’) c. Type: RG-178

4.6.4 Intermediate Y Cables

a. Hypertronics “Y” cable: two 160-pin females into one 160-pin male b. Hypertronics “Y” cable: two 160-pin males into one 160-pin female c. Length: 10.6 meters (~35’)

4.6.5 Cable Adapter (112-140-264)

a. Hypertronics 160-pin female to 160-pin male b. Length: 0.15 meters (~0.5’)

A-12

Figure 4 Cable Diagram

A-13

4.7. Motion Control/Manipulator

4.7.1. An encoded manipulator calibrated to provide accurate positioning shall be utilized. The manipulator shall be capable of performing the scanning and indexing requirements of this procedure. In addition, the scanner shall have the ability to provide adequate force to keep the search unit coupled to the pipe surface.

4.8. Ultrasonic Couplant

4.8.1. The ultrasonic couplant or demin water to be used shall be in sufficient quantities to

maintain adequate acoustic contact between the search unit and component, and shall be approved by the Owner for use.

4.9. Calibration and Reference Blocks

4.9.1. Calibration blocks shall be used to establish a reference sensitivity level from which

subsequent examinations may be compared. The calibration block design shall be the Basic Calibration Block described in III-3400 of the ASME B & PV Code Section XI (Appendix III) or an alternative calibration block as approved and /or provided by the owner.

4.9.2. The Phased Array Reference Blocks shall be made of the same material type (carbon or

stainless steel) as the component being examined. The Phased Array Reference Blocks are described in Figure 5.

4.9.3. For calibration for 6” NPS piping either a 4” or 6” NPS pipe section shall be used, in lieu

of the Phased Array Reference Block. The pipe section shall contain a circumferential notch, a notch of the same depth rotated 45° clockwise, and a notch of the same depth rotated 45° counterclockwise. All three notches shall be located on the inside surface. The depth shall be as specified for the Basic Calibration Block described in III-3400 of the ASME B&PV Code Section XI (Appendix III). The thickness of the pipe section shall be at least ¾”.

4.9.4. Reference blocks (i.e. IIW, DSC, Rompas, etc.) used for establishing linear screen

ranges shall be made of the same material type (carbon or stainless steel) as the component being examined. Reference blocks used for verifying phased array channel count and performing calibration verifications (cal checks) may be made of any suitable material provided that adequate time base and amplitude verification points can be established.

4.10. When desired, contour gauges may be used to obtain OD surface profiles to aid in the

evaluation of indications.

A-14

Figure 5 Phased Array Reference Block

A-15

4.11. Phased Array Software

4.11.1. The “EPRI Piping Single Phased Array Probe Workbook V1.0 Rev0.0.xls” shall be used

to develop scan plans, create “Focal Depth Files” (*.adf), create “merge.ini” files, and record examination information. Later revisions of the software shall be considered equivalent if they allow the generation of equivalent scan patterns, “Focal Depth Files”, and “merge.ini” files, and if the revision has been validated through the software configuration control process.

4.11.2. The “EPRI Phased Array Toolkit V1.0 Rev0” shall be used to calculate all focal laws

uploaded into TomoView Version 2.2 Revision Q14. Later revisions of the software shall be considered equivalent if they allow the generation of equivalent beam and skew angles for the minimum number of transmitting and receiving elements and if the revision has been validated through the software configuration control process.

5. CALIBRATION

5.1. General Information

5.1.1. Select the appropriate search unit and wedge combination for the examination to be performed. Refer to Lists 3 & 4 for search unit/wedge configurations. Connect the search unit and wedge combination to the Tomoscan III/PA system.

5.1.2. The default measurement system in TomoView 2.2Q14 is “Metric” and shall not be

changed during calibration, data setup, or data acquisition. Ensure that the “Bypass Analysis” box under “Preferences” is checked.

5.1.3. Input all pre-determined essential and non-essential instrument UT settings identified in

List 9A – 9K into TomoView into Channel #1.

5.1.4. Create ultrasonic channels 2 through 4 by copying channel 1. Rename each channel using the ultrasonic channel name in List 5. For channel 4 (4370L) the “Wave” should be changed to “Longitudinal”, the “Sound velocity” should be updated (See List 6), and the Time base Range should also be updated. (See 5.5.4).

5.1.5. Load the appropriate focal law file for the current ultrasonic channel. (See List 5)

5.2. Active Channel Count

5.2.1. An active channel count shall be performed for each search unit prior to a series of

exams or any time that system irregularity is suspected. The following steps should be used to perform an active channel count.

a. Apply a special focal law that allows viewing individually the responses of each element. This special focal law shall be included in a setup file named “single probe element check01.acq”.

b. Place the search unit on a block, which contains an appropriate reflector, and obtain a

response. Observe the number of channels that are not operating (a non-operative channel might result from a failure of the channel’s piezoelectric element, cabling, pulser, or receiver).

A-16

c. If at least 21 of the channels are functioning the system is considered to be acceptable. The procedure demonstration was performed with 7 of the elements turned off.

5.3. Focal Law Creation

5.3.1. Focal laws shall be created or approved by the qualified Data Analyst.

5.3.2. The “EPRI Piping Single Phased Array Probe Workbook V1.0 Rev0.0.xls” shall be used

to create the appropriate “Focal Depth File” (*.adf) and “Procedure Input Files” (*.epi) for a given wedge, focal depth, and pipe specimen. This “Procedure Input File” shall then be loaded into the “EPRI Phased Array Toolkit” by the user to generate the corresponding “Focal Law File” (*.law). All focal law files shall be generated using the “EPRI Phased Array Toolkit”.

5.3.3. Focal law files are created based on the following items:

a. Material velocity (List 6), transducer (List 3), wedge (List 4), and pipe diameter.

b. Focal law “Groups” shall be created with the appropriate wave mode (see List 5). The

“Focal Depth File” and “Procedure Input File” generated by the “EPRI Piping Single Phased Array Probe Workbook V1.0 Rev0.0.xls” automatically provides the correct beam angles and skew angles. This file should then be loaded into the “EPRI Phased Array Toolkit” to insure that the correct focal law “Groups” are used.

c. For piping with a nominal thickness greater than or equal to 0.5 inch (16.51mm), the

focal depth shall be equal to the thickness of the pipe ±0.25” (6.35 mm). For piping with a nominal thickness less than 0.5 inch (14.9mm), the focal depth shall be equal to three times the thickness of the pipe, with a ±0.25” (6.35mm) tolerance on the focal depth.

Note: Pipe thickness shall be based on the average wall thickness of the upstream and downstream sides of the weld measured at the weld toes. If dual sided access is not available, and the weld crown is ground flush, the measured thickness at the weld centerline should be used. When the weld crown configuration precludes an accurate thickness reading, the pipe thickness of the accessible side should be used.

A-17

5.3.4. Both upstream and downstream focal law files are generated and named automatically

by the “EPRI Phased Array Toolkit” software in one calculation. Focal law files (*.law) should be named using the following convention:

“Material Type”“Pipe Diameter”_”Wedge Part #”_”Minimum Beam Angle””Maximum Beam Angle” “Mode”“’FD’””FocalDepth””_””Beam Direction”

a. “Material Type” shall be “SS” for austenitic materials and “CS” for ferritc materials.

b. Focal law files for looking downstream scans (Probe Skew of 270o) shall have a suffix

of “_LkDn”. Focal law files for looking upstream scans (Probe Skew of 90o) shall have a suffix of “_LkUp”.

Example: Shear wave focal law files for an austenitic pipe, 305mm diameter using wedge 118-340-373” at a focal depth of 17mm would be as follows:

“SS406_123-456-798_4070SFD32_LkUp.law” (looking upstream) “SS406_123-456-798_4070SFD32_LkDn.law” (looking downstream).

5.3.5. Focal law files are loaded into TomoView using the following process:

a. Select/activate the appropriate ultrasonic channel. (See List 5)

b. Click on the Tomoview Focal Law Calculator Icon and choose "Read a sector from a file", then click “Next”.

c. Click "Browse" and select the appropriate file.

d. Click "Replace” to replace the current set of focal laws with the focal laws from the file.

e. Click "Finish" to load the focal laws into TomoView.

Material & Pipe Dia. Wedge Part #. Min. & Max. Angles, Mode,and Focal depth(FD#)

A-18

5.3.6. After all the applicable focal laws have been loaded the “Time base Start” should be set to “0”. The “Time base Start” should also be set to “0” after establishing the system delay.

5.3.7. The focal law filename should be input on the scan plan.

5.4. Focal Law Verification

5.4.1. Focal Law Verification shall be completed for each ultrasonic channel (1 through 4).

5.4.2. Focal laws shall be verified prior to each examination on an appropriate (CS or SS) reference block similar to the block shown in Figure 5. The following process should be used for focal law verification:

a. Split the setup screen to display two windows, one an “S-scan” and the other an “On-

line A-scan”.

b. Use the cursor in the “S-scan” window to select the focal law for a beam/skew angle of 45°/0° for ultrasonic channels 1 and 4; 45°/±45° for ultrasonic channels 2 and 3.

c. Using the appropriate reference block adjust the probe position and rotation to maximize the amplitude of the response from the appropriate reflector. For 6” contoured wedges, the appropriate reflector is an ID notch in the reference block defined in Paragraph 4.9.3. For wedges contoured for 12” and larger diameters, the appropriate reflector is the SDH that is closest to the thickness of the component, in the reference block defined in Paragraph 4.9.2.

d. Without moving the search unit, use the S-scan cursors to measure the depth of the

reflector. For the Phased Array Reference Block defined in Paragraph 4.9.2, measure the depths of both the SDH closest to the thickness of the component and the SDH at the next shallower depth.

e. If the measured depths are accurate (±10% of the true depth) then the focal laws’

beam angles are considered accurate. The actual and measured depths should be recorded on the calibration data sheet.

5.5. Ultrasonic Calibration

5.5.1. General Information

a. Initial system calibrations shall be performed prior to an examination or series of examinations. A system calibration check (calibration verification) shall be performed as required by paragraph 5.7.

b. The basic calibration data and the digitized A-Scan data acquired during examinations

may be stored on any appropriate storage media.

c. All initial and final calibration and calibration verification times and data shall be recorded on the calibration data sheet. A copy of the calibration data sheet shall be included in the Examination Report.

d. A linear time base representing metal path shall be established. The time base shall

be calibrated using an appropriate reference block (CS or SS) with known reflector distances.

A-19

5.5.2. Acoustic Velocity Setting

a. Acoustic velocity settings for search unit modes of propagation and material types are shown in List 6.

List 6- Material Velocities

Material Velocity Longitudinal Velocity Shear

US Units in./sec.

Metric Units m/sec.

US Units in./sec.

Metric Units m/sec.

Carbon Steel 231890 5890 127165 3230 Stainless Steel 227165 5770 124016 3150

5.5.3. System Delay Setting

a. The system delay is established using a beam angle/skew angle of 45o/0o for ultrasonic channels 1 and 4, and 45°/±45° for ultrasonic channels 2 and 3 on an appropriate reference block. The reference block shall provide appropriate reflectors, such as a 2-inch and/or 4-inch radius. For 6” NPS an ID notch should be used. Peak the signal from the reflector, and then adjust the system delay until the peak of the reflector signal is at the correct time base location.

5.5.4. Time Base (Range) Size

a. Weld profile and component thickness information shall be reviewed prior to calibration to aid in the development of scan plans and establishing an appropriate time base size.

b. The time base size shall be sufficient to provide adequate coverage of the required

examination volume from each side of the weld. Sufficient allowance should be provided for material thickness and/or sound path variation. The following guidelines should be used for establishing time base size, based on the thickness T:

1. For nominal thicknesses greater than or equal to 0.5 inch, the minimum time base

shall be Min.TB =(T+0.25”)/cos(70o) and the maximum time base shall be Max.TB =((Tx1.5)+0.25”)/cos(70o).

2. For nominal thicknesses less than 0.5 inch, the minimum time base shall be Min.TB =(3T+0.25”)/cos(70o) and the maximum time base shall be Max.TB =((3Tx1.5)+0.25”)/cos(70o).

5.6. Reference Sensitivity

5.6.1. Reference sensitivity shall be established for all ultrasonic channels (1 through 4) using an ASME basic calibration block, or for 6” NPS, using the reference block defined in Paragraph 4.9.3. Establish the reference sensitivity using the following process:

a. Peak the signal from the ID notch using a beam angle/skew angle of 45o/0o for

ultrasonic channels 1 and 4, and 45°/±45° for ultrasonic channels 2 and 3 and adjust the amplitude to approximately 80% full screen height (FSH).

A-20

b. Record the calibration block name, array part #, wedge part #, focal law filename,

beam angle, skew angle, metal path, amplitude, noise level, and gain setting on the calibration data sheet included in “EPRI Piping Single Phased Array Probe Workbook V1.0 Rev0.xls”.

5.7. Calibration Verification (Cal check)

5.7.1. Calibration Verification shall be completed for all ultrasonic channels (1 through 4).

5.7.2. The following process shall be used to establish calibration verification measurements:

a. Using the same focal law used to establish reference sensitivity (see 5.6), obtain and

maximize a response from a known reflector in a reference block such as the phased array reference block or an appropriate reference block.

b. Adjust the signal amplitude to approximately 80% full screen height (FSH).

c. Record the identification of the reference block, the identification of the selected

reflector, the gain setting, metal path position and amplitude of this reflector.

5.7.3. Time base and amplitude calibration points shall be recorded during the initial calibration and verified:

a. Prior to a series of examinations

b. At the completion of a series of examinations

c. At intervals not to exceed 12 hr

d. After any interruption in system continuity (e.g., power interruptions, activation of new

examination setups, etc.)

e. After any instance of suspected system irregularity.

5.7.4. Acceptance criteria for calibration check

a. Time base response from reference reflector has not changed by more than ± 10% of the original position.

b. Amplitude response from reference notch reflector has not changed by more than ± 3

dB of the original response. Amplitude changes of 3dB or more shall be investigated to the extent necessary to determine the cause and provide corrective action. If the amplitude has decreased by 3dB or more an active channel count should be performed using the process outlined in paragraph 5.2.

c. At least 21 beam elements in each array are operating.

5.7.5. If any calibration verification fails to meet these requirements, all examinations since the

last successful calibration check shall be voided and the affected components shall be re-examined.

5.7.6. Any change in search units, wedges, focal laws, or UT instruments from that used during

the initial calibration shall be cause for re-calibration. When replacing cables of the same size, type, length and number of intermediate connectors as used during the original calibration, it is acceptable to perform a calibration check and active channel count only.

A-21

6. EXAMINATION

6.1. General Requirements

6.1.1. Prior to examination, the system operator shall verify that all pre-determined essential and non-essential instrument settings identified in Lists 9A through 9K and Lists 10A through 10F are set as specified in this procedure.

6.1.2. Weld profile and component thickness information shall be available prior to examination.

6.1.3. The reference system (Lo, Wo) shall be established per Reference 2.1.

6.1.4. The coordinate systems for circumferential and axial flaw examinations can be found in

Figure 6. The scanner shall be “inverted” appropriately such that the positive and negative “Scan” and “Index” directions are maintained for all scans. The positive Index axis shall be opposite the flow direction in the pipe. The positive Scan direction shall be clockwise while looking in the flow direction.

Figure 6 Examination Coordinate System

A-22

6.2. Required Examination Volume and Surface Condition Requirements

6.2.1. The required examination volume as identified in Figure 10 shall be scanned from both

sides of the weld when accessible. Welds that cannot be examined from at least one (1) side shall be reported to the Owner for disposition.

Figure 7 Examination Volume

6.2.2. The examination shall be performed from the OD surface of the piping component to be

examined. The surface shall be free of irregularities, loose material, or coatings, which interfere with the ultrasonic wave transmission. Areas where ultrasonic contact is inadequate shall be documented as limitations and reported to the Owner for disposition.

6.2.3. When using shear waves to examine austenitic piping, it is important that the wedge

footprint is on base metal. In some cases, weld crowns are blended with the base metal so smoothly that the axial location of the weld toe is not visible. On each side of the weld that will be scanned, if the location of the toe is not visible, the location of the toe shall be identified using etchants, small magnets, or other means.

6.3. Scan Plans

6.3.1. Each weld shall be scanned in accordance with a scan plan developed using the “EPRI

Piping Single Phased Array Probe Workbook V1.0 Rev0.xls”. Scan plans shall be developed or approved by a qualified data analyst.

6.3.2. Scan plans shall be prepared prior to each examination. Scan plans shall provide the

system operator with the scan parameters to be applied and additionally identify the scan coordinates that bound the area to be scanned. The component geometry and/or contour of the area of interest and adjacent scan surfaces shall be evaluated to determine coverage and scan distances. If minor scan parameter changes are required as a result of actual conditions encountered (e.g., wider than expected crown widths, physical obstructions, etc.) the changed values shall be recorded.

6.3.3. The following scan plan information shall be input into the ultrasonic examination system:

a. Scan Offset and Index offset information shall be entered in “UT Settings” under the

“Probe” tab in “Modify Probe-T”.

b. Scan Start, Scan Stop, and Scan Resolution, along with Index Start, Index Stop, and Index Resolution shall be entered in “Inspection Settings” under the “Sequence” tab.

A-23

c. Scan file name using a file naming convention that uniquely identifies information for each exam conducted. The “EPRI Piping Single Phased Array Probe Workbook V1.0 Rev0.xls” automatically suggest an appropriate scan file name. Specific information recommended for each examination data file name includes:

• Weld ID • Wedge number • Minimum and maximum beam angles • Focal depth • Beam direction • Wave Mode

6.4. Scan Patterns (Line Scans)

6.4.1. The maximum scan speed shall be determined from the “Acquisition Rate” and “Scan Resolution” of “1 mm” . The maximum scan speed shall be 95% of the product of the “Acquisition Rate” and the “Scan Resolution”. For example, the maximum scan speed with an acquisition rate of 8 Hz and scan resolution of “1 mm” is “7.6 mm/s”.

6.4.2. List 7 identifies the minimum number, and required positions of scan lines for each

examination. Additional scan lines may be requested by the qualified data analyst to further interrogate suspect indications or to compensate for geometrical uncertainties (offset weld root, tapers, etc.).

List 7 Line Scan Examinations Thickness Access Propagation Minimum # of Lines Positions

>0.500” Dual Side Shear & Longitudinal (Stainless Only)

4 6.4.3

>0.500” Single Side Shear & Longitudinal (Stainless Only)

4 6.4.4

≤0.500” Dual Side Shear 4 6.4.3

≤0.500” Single Side Shear 4 6.4.4

Note: The longitudinal wave mode (channel 4) is not required for dual side access or carbon steel material or pipe thickness less than or equal to 0.5”.

6.4.3. Scan Positions (Dual Side Access)

The scan positions are illustrated in Figure 8.

a. When possible, the transducer position for the first scan line will be such that a 45° beam angle with a 52.5° skew strikes the inside surface at the centerline of the weld. If the weld crown width prevents this from occurring then the transducer position for the first scan line will be with the front of the wedge as close as possible to the weld toe. The wedge footprint must be on base material when examining austenitic materials with any crown conditions, or when examining ferritic materials with non-flush weld crowns. [The 45o/52.5o beam angle is actually the angle at the opposite surface]

A-24

b. The transducer position for the last scan line will be such that a 45° beam angle with a 0° skew strikes the inside surface at the back of the examination volume. If the separation between the first and second scan lines are less than T/2 then the transducer position for the second scan line will be changed to T/2 from the first scan line. The second and third scan lines shall be positioned between the first and fourth lines, to provide a constant axial scan increment.

c. For piping that is less than or equal to 0.5” thick, the scan lines are determined as

defined in “a” and “b” above, but assuming that the thickness for the last scan line is three times the actual thickness, so that the examination is configured for the 3/2 vee-path. (See Figure 9)

Figure 8 Dual Side Access Technique (T>0.500”)

Figure 9 Dual Side Access Technique (T≤0.500”)

A-25

6.4.4. Scan Positions (Single Side Access)

The scan positions are illustrated in Figure 10.

a. When possible, the transducer position for the first scan line will be such that a 45° beam angle with a 52.5° skew strikes strikes the inside surface at the far-side edge of the examination volume. This will require that the wedge be positioned on the weld. If the weld crown contour prevents this from occurring with adequate contact, then the transducer position for the first scan line will be with the front of the wedge as close as possible to the weld toe. The wedge footprint must be on base material when examining austenitic materials with any crown conditions, or when examining ferritic materials with non-flush weld crowns. [The 45o/52.5o beam angle is actually the angle at the opposite surface]

b. The transducer position for the last scan line will be such that a 45° beam angle with a

0° skew strikes the inside surface at the back of the examination volume. If the separation between the first and second scan lines are less than T/2 then the transducer position for the second scan line will be changed to T/2 from the first scan line. The second and third scan lines shall be positioned between the first and fourth lines, to provide a constant axial scan increment.

c. For piping that is less than or equal to 0.5” thick, the scan lines are determined as

defined in “a” and “b” above, but assuming that the thickness for the last scan line is three times the actual thickness, so that the examination is configured for the 3/2 vee-path. (See Figure 11)

Figure 10 Single Side Access Technique (T>0.500”)

A-26

Figure 11 Single Side Access Technique (T≤0.500”)

6.5. Scan Sensitivity

6.5.1. For channel 1 using shear waves, the scanning sensitivity shall be initially determined by selecting the beam angle from “Group 1a” at 0° skew which the forward scan line strikes the weld centerline at the inside surface and adjusting the acquisition gain until the material noise in the area of the weld root is between 2% and 5% FSH. For channel 4 using longitudinal waves, the scanning sensitivity shall be initially determined by selecting the beam angle from “Group 1b” at 0° skew which the forward scan line strikes the weld centerline at the inside surface and adjusting the acquisition gain until the material noise in the area of the weld root is between 4% and 8% FSH.

6.5.2. For channels 2 and 3, the scanning sensitivity shall be initially determined by selecting

the beam angle from “Group 2 or 3” at 52.5o skew which strikes the weld centerline at the inside surface and adjusting the acquisition gain until the material noise in the area of the weld root is between 2% and 5% FSH.

6.5.3. During scanning the system operator shall verify equipment operation and search unit

contact by observing data acquisition displays. It is recommended that both the “S-Scan” view, and a “DynAC-Side” view for a focal law which strikes the inside surface near the weld root, should be displayed while acquiring data. If the operator notices that the initial scanning sensitivity has been set inappropriately (too high or too low) whereas responses in the area of the weld root are absent or excessively saturated, the scan shall be stopped, scan gain shall be adjusted appropriately, and the affected data shall be recollected.

6.6. Supplemental scans may be required by the qualified Data Analyst to obtain additional

information. Supplemental examinations are acceptable provided they are not used to overturn the results of examinations obtained with the primary qualified examination technique described within the procedure, or obtain coverage in lieu of the qualified technique.

6.7. Ensure examinations are performed in accordance with this procedure and the Scan Plan.

Where examination limitations are encountered document these on the examination report and advise the qualified Data Analyst.

A-27

7. DATA ANALYSIS

7.1. Pre-Analysis Verifications

7.1.1. Weld fabrication and examination data histories, if available, should be reviewed prior to analysis of the ultrasonic examination data.

7.1.2. Prior to analyzing data, the Data Analyst shall ensure the quality of the data by verifying

the following:

a. All data has been collected in accordance with requirements of this procedure.

b. All required examinations have been performed and scan limitations documented.

c. The necessary data records and scan plans are completed.

d. A thickness and contour has been performed or provided.

e. Adequate search unit contact has been achieved. Isolated instances of lack of contact may be accepted provided that no more than 3 adjacent acquisition positions are empty of data in the direction of scanning and the area does not contain flaw or suspected flaw indications that require evaluation.

f. Areas that do not meet the acceptance criteria stated above shall be reexamined. If

repeated examinations do not achieve acceptable scans, the total amount of missed coverage shall be calculated.

A-28

7.2. Initial Data Analysis Set-up

7.2.1. All examination data files shall be initially evaluated utilizing the data analysis layout

views identified in Figure 12.

Figure 12 Phased Array Analysis Layout

Volume Corrected Side B Merge Volume Corrected Top C Merge Volume Corrected End D Merge Note: The Volume Corrected End D Merge is optional for Axial flaw evaluations.

A-29

7.2.2. Focal Law Merge Files

a. Individual focal laws are merged to create special volumetric merge views for the analysis system display. The “EPRI Piping Single Phased Array Probe Workbook” shall be utilized to create a “Batch Volumetric Merge” file (*.bvm) and “Volumetric Merge” files (“.vmc) for initial data evaluation. These merged views can be activated from the “Tools” drop-down menu under “change channels”.

b. The merged views identified in List 9 were utilized as a template for the processes

used to qualify this procedure and shall each be viewed as a minimum data analysis requirement. Additional merge views can be created using the workbook or from the analysis system software.

List 8 Layout Merge Views

Beam Directions LKUP or LKDN Merge Channel Name Merge Details

MERGE 4070S SKW -15 Merge all angles from 40° - 70° at (-) 15° Skew only (Shear) MERGE 4070S SKW 0 Merge all angles from 40° - 70° at 0° Skew only (Shear) MERGE 4070S SKW +15 Merge all angles from 40° - 70° at (+) 15° Skew only (Shear) MERGE 5570S SKW 0 Merge only angles from 55° - 70° at 0° Skew (Shear) MERGE 4070S All Ref Merge all angles from 40° - 70° at all skews (Shear) MERGE 3560 SKW -35 Merge all angles from 35° - 60° at (- ) 35° Skew only MERGE 3560 SKW -45 Merge all angles from 35° - 60° at (- ) 45° Skew only MERGE 3560 SKW -52.5 Merge all angles from 35° - 60° at (-) 52.5° Skew only MERGE 3560 SKW -60 Merge all angles from 35° - 60° at (-) 60° Skew only MERGE 3560 SKW -67.5 Merge all angles from 35° - 60° at (-) 67.5° Skew only MERGE 3560 SKW All - Merge all angles from 35° - 60°and all (-)skews MERGE 3560 SKW +35 Merge all angles from 35° - 60° at (+ ) 35° Skew only MERGE 3560 SKW +45 Merge all angles from 35° - 60° at (+ ) 45° Skew only MERGE 3560 SKW +52.5 Merge all angles from 35° - 60° at (+) 52.5° Skew only MERGE 3560 SKW +60 Merge all angles from 35° - 60° at (+) 60° Skew only MERGE 3560 SKW +67.5 Merge all angles from 35° - 60° at (+) 67.5° Skew only MERGE 3560 SKW All + Merge all angles from 35° - 60°and all (+)skews MERGE 4370L SKW -15 Merge all angles from 43° - 70° at (-) 15° Skew only (Longitudinal) MERGE 4370L SKW 0 Merge all angles from 43° - 70° at 0° Skew only (Longitudinal) MERGE 4370L SKW +15 Merge all angles from 43° - 70° at (+) 15° Skew only (Longitudinal) MERGE 5570L SKW 0 Merge only angles from 55° - 70° at 0° Skew (Longitudinal) MERGE 4370L All Ref Merge all angles from 43° - 70° at all skews (Longitudinal)

A-30

7.3. Evaluation of Ultrasonic Data

7.3.1. Load the appropriate data file.

a. Ensure all volume-corrected views are in the projection mode.

b. Activate each pane and set all measurement units to inches, with two decimal places

of precision, or set all to millimeters with one decimal place of precision. Set the USOUND setting to “True Depth”.

c. Under the “Edit Pane Properties” icon select the “Parameters” tab and verify that all

parameters are correct (sound velocity, delay, offsets, etc.).

d. In all the merged volume corrected displays adjust the gate cursors to envelop the entire scan area. After this evaluation, these gates can be manipulated to display specific regions of the weld length or volume for pattern interpretation and comparison. For axial flaw channels, the “Index” and “Depth” gates shall be adjusted so that the signal responses from the internal wedge noise is not displayed in the “VC-Top” and “VC-Side” views.

e. For each merged channel, analyze the volumetric images to identify areas that exhibit

deviation from the component geometrical or metallurgical interface responses. The amplitude color palette range will require adjustment to provide resolution of the various reflectors throughout the scan. The analyst must assure that the data is evaluated from the background noise level and above. Several palette ranges should be evaluated in order to provide optimum image contrast and to ensure that flaw indications are not masked with the background noise. The following are examples of conditions that may warrant additional analysis:

1. Localized high amplitude indications; or

2. Indications which exhibit throughwall depth; or

3. Indications which are offset from normal geometry, such as the weld centerline,

root, or counter bore areas; or

4. Indications that display unique response as compared to benchmark responses.

f. When analyzing data from piping that is less than 0.5” thick, two additional good practices should be followed:

1. When evaluating data for circumferential defects, the top view should be evaluated with the projection gates enveloping the ½-vee path, and again with the gates enveloping the 3/2-vee path. The gates should be set to exclude geometric and metallurgical reflectors occurring at or near the full-vee path.

2. When evaluating data for axial defects, care should be taken to evaluate each skew angle individually, using the “Change Channel” function. This is to ensure that each flaw is viewed at its best signal-to-noise ratio.

7.4. Discrimination of Indications

7.4.1. The following conditions should be considered for determination of geometrical

indications. Note: These items should not be considered mandatory criteria for

A-31

classifying indications as geometry, but are listed as significant points to consider by the data analyst during evaluation of suspect areas

a. The indication appears at or near the centerline of the weld or other documented

geometrical condition (i.e., counter bore). This information can be evaluated against the thickness and contour information.

b. The indication can be seen across the entire length of the scan (either continuously or

intermittently) at consistent amplitude and position responses.

c. The indication possesses very little or no echo dynamic travel in the depth direction.

d. When a comparison is made between responses from a lower and higher beam angle merges, the indication responses are significantly lower or not detected with the higher beam angles.

e. When a comparison is made between the 0° skew merges and the 15° skew merges

the indication responses are significantly lower or not detected with the 15° skew merges.

f. The indication displays patterns or signal responses (multiples), which can be

indicative of mode converted shear wave signals from the use of longitudinal wave search units or mode converted signals from counter bore.

7.4.2. The following conditions should be considered for determination of metallurgical

indications. Note: These items should not be considered mandatory criteria for classifying indications as metallurgical indications, but are listed as significant points to consider by the data analyst during evaluation of suspect areas.

a. The indication appears at or near one of the welds’ acoustical interfaces.

b. The indication is not connected to a surface.

c. Similar indications can be seen at varying amplitudes 360° intermittently.

7.4.3. The following conditions should be considered for determination of flaw indications.

Note: These items should not be considered mandatory flaw confirmation criteria, but are listed as significant points to consider by the data analyst during evaluation of suspect areas.

a. The indication has a high signal-to-noise ratio. This information can be supported by

raising the upper and lower amplitude thresholds of the color palette and observing signal-to-noise ratio contrast across the length of the component.

b. The indication response is isolated from common geometrical benchmark responses

(e.g., root geometry, counterbore).

c. The indication displays several areas of unique and inconsistent amplitude peaks.

d. When a comparison is made between responses from a lower and higher beam angle merges, the indication responses are at comparable or higher amplitude with the higher beam angles.

e. For circumferential flaws, the responses maintain good signal to noise ratio when

viewing either of the skew merges.

A-32

f. During axial flaw scans a skew angle detects a reflector which can be contributed to

an axial component in an area adjacent to a suspect circumferential indication.

g. The indication has defined start and end points. (May not apply to axial flaws).

h. The indication possesses echo dynamic responses indicating reflector depth. Due to flaw orientation this information may be displayed in the Volume Corrected Side B Merge as a significant pattern of response displayed above and/or below the measured material thickness.

i. For circumferential flaws, the indication can be confirmed from the opposite side of the

weld. This information may not be available if the ultrasonic beam is required to propagate through austenitic weld material.

j. For axial flaws, the indication can be confirmed from alternative beam skews.

7.4.4. The following information should be additionally considered during the evaluation of each

suspected indication in austenitic welds where access is limited to a single side and the ultrasonic beam is required to propagate through austenitic weld material.

a. The indication is not related to adverse conditions caused by the austenitic weld

material (e.g., beam redirect or beam steering).

b. The shear wave and/or longitudinal wave search units show an isolated indication that is located on the far side of the weld.

c. The indication response is repeatable during additional or supplemental scans.

d. The indication possesses echo dynamic responses indicating reflector depth. Due to

flaw orientation this information may be displayed in the Volume Corrected Side B Merge as a significant pattern of response displayed above or below the measured material thickness.

7.4.5. Once the analyst has determined that an indication is a flaw, the following items should

be considered to determine if the flaw is surface-connected.

a. The shear wave indication is projected at the inside surface. For axial flaws, the indication may image beyond the inside surface.

b. When viewing the merged B or D Scan images, there is no clear separation between

the flaw and the inside surface geometry.

c. Indications from longitudinal wave search units have an accompanying shear wave component signal present confirming the location detected by the L-wave component.

d. Consideration should be given for single side examinations in austenitic materials

where the sound beam must penetrate through the weld material (far side flaws). Determining indication surface connection may be difficult due to beam redirection and component thickness uncertainty.

7.4.6. Circumferential Flaw Length Sizing (Ultrasonic Channels 1 & 4)

a. Length sizing should generally be performed utilizing 0° skew data from the

examinations performed on the same side of the weld as the indications. However, if component geometry provides limitations (e.g., longitudinal weld obstructions, welded

A-33

attachments, etc.) or the flaw orientation provides improved and satisfactory UT responses, then 0° skew data from opposite side examinations may be used to provide additional information to the same side data. Also, some flaws that are of nominally circumferential orientation are actually skewed to some degree, and in such cases the +15° or the -15° skewed images might produce a similar or better signal-to-noise ratio as the 0° skewed images. In these cases, the +15° or -15° skewed data may be used in conjunction with the 0° skew data to make length measurements.

b. The flaw length shall be determined by locating and recording search unit

circumferential position at the end points where the flaw signal is no longer present (full amplitude drop).

c. This technique provides the outside diameter length dimension which is longer than

the actual inside diameter dimension due to pipe curvature; therefore to calculate the flaw length at the ID surface, use the following formula:

(ID/OD) x OD flaw length dimension = ID flaw dimension.

7.4.7. Flaw Positioning

a. In general, the flaw shall be positioned in the axial (Y) and the circumferential (X)

direction using the data from the merge view that was used to determine the final flaw length.

b. Due to component geometrical configuration (tapers, radius, surface mismatches,

etc.) and/or inherent uncertainties associated with wave propagation in austenitic materials, indication positioning may require detailed evaluation. Also, when using shear waves for examination of piping that is less than 0.5” thick, axial and circumferential position information may be less accurate at the 3/2-vee path than at the ½-vee path. The following shall be considered during circumferential indication positioning.

1. Evaluate the “Volume Corrected C” Merge image to identify common geometric

benchmark responses that may be available (e.g., root geometry or weld volume responses). Determine if these responses are being displayed correctly in relationship to the weld centerline.

2. Evaluate the “Volume Corrected B and/or D” merges from both sides (upstream

and downstream) of the weld. Determine if the ultrasonic responses from the indication appear reduced due to weld volume sound attenuation from one side or another

c. All axial flaw indications shall be plotted or calculated to compensate for the ID/OD

ratio of the component.

A-34

8. DATA RECORDING

8.1. Any indication of a suspected flaw shall be recorded regardless of amplitude.

8.2. The following information shall be provided for each suspected flaw indication. It shall be submitted in both hardcopy and electronic form:

a. Search unit identification, location, and orientation

b. Flaw indication coordinates in the scan and index axis (circumferential position and

axial position relative to the weld centerline)

c. Flaw length

d. System image prints identifying the flaw and surrounding material conditions as requested by the plant Owner. All printed or stored images should have the Palette window visible, or should otherwise indicate any soft gain that has been applied.

8.3. The examination report shall include specific instrument/ calibration information and

examination information including a copy of the calibration and scan plan data sheets. The minimum Examination Report information is listed below and is documented via hard copy or electronic media (e.g. optical disks).

a. All essential variable settings.

b. Examination Report identification, date of calibration; date and time period of

examination(s)

c. Examination procedure number and revision

d. Names of examination personnel and NDE level

e. Basic calibration block identification

f. µTomoscan and Tomoscan III/PA model and serial numbers

g. Applicable Software revision (Analysis, Collection, Focal Law Creation Software)

h. Search unit configuration

i. Wedge Part #

j. Examination type (circumferential or axial)

k. Focal law filename

l. Extension cable type and length

m. Calibration reflector type and location

n. Couplant and batch number

o. Record of the reference sensitivity including beam angles, skew angles

p. Times of initial and final calibration and subsequent calibration checks

A-35

q. Examination results (to be completed by the Data Analyst on the Indication Report)

r. Scanning limitations encountered, with measurements to the nearest 0.10" (2.5 mm).

9. DATA COMPARISON

9.1. In-service examination results shall be compared with available records from previous examinations (PSI, ISI, special examinations, etc.). As a minimum, the following steps shall be performed:

9.1.1. Review prior data to determine the existence and location of flaw indications.

9.1.2. Compare the location and length of flaw indications.

10. EVALUATION

10.1. Initial evaluation of reportable indications shall be conducted in accordance with the applicable ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section XI, Article IWA-3000.

10.2. Final evaluation and disposition of reportable indications shall be the responsibility of the

customer. 11. RECORDS

11.1. Records produced in accordance with this procedure shall be stored as specified by the customer.

A-36

12. ESSENTIAL UT INSTRUMENT AND MOTION CONTROL SETTINGS

12.1. For some UT setting parameters identified in lists 9A – 9K the input value may not be accepted by the system as is. The system hardware will validate the input setting and display an actual value. Some of the settings from this list are purposely identified as higher or lower than the eventually displayed value. The validated value is the actual value and shall be utilized for any recording.

List 9A- UT Settings (Main Screen)

Item Required or Recommended/ Default Settings

Essential / Non-Essential

All laws Checked Essential Interleaved Unchecked Essential Linear Unchecked Essential

List 9B- UT Settings (General Tab)

Item Required or Recommended/ Default Settings

Essential / Non-Essential

Channel Gain Paragraph 6.5 Essential Focal Law Gain 0 Essential Time base Start 0 Essential Time base Range Paragraph 5.5.4 (Paragraph 12.1) Essential Time base Mode Half path Essential

List 9C- UT Settings (Gate Tab)

Item Required or Recommended/ Default Settings

Essential / Non-Essential

Gate 0 Start 0 Non-Essential Gate 0 Length 15 Non-Essential Gate 1 Threshold 0 Non-Essential Gate 1 Start 0 Non-Essential Gate 1 Length 15 Non-Essential Gate 1 Threshold 0 Non-Essential Gate 1 Alarm Level 0 Non-Essential Gate 1 Data Pos 1 Unchecked Essential Gate 1 Data Amp 1 Unchecked Essential Gate 1 Type Maximum Non-Essential Gate 2 Threshold 0 Non-Essential Gate 2 Start 0 Non-Essential Gate 2 Length 15 Non-Essential Gate 2 Threshold 0 Non-Essential Gate 2 Alarm Level 0 Non-Essential Gate 2 Data Pos 2 Unchecked Essential Gate 2 Data Amp 2 Unchecked Essential Gate 2 Type Maximum Non-Essential

A-37

List 9D- UT Settings (DAC Tab)

Item Required or Recommended/ Default Settings

Essential / Non-Essential

Enable Unchecked Essential

List 9E- UT Settings (Digitizer Tab)

Item Required or Recommended/ Default Settings

Essential / Non-Essential

Digitizing frequency 12.5 MHz Essential Averaging 1 Essential Acquisition rate Max Value Essential Data sample size 12 bits Essential Recurrence 2500 Hz Essential Synchro Pulse Essential A-scan Checked Essential Multi-Peak Unchecked Essential A-Scan video Unchecked Essential Compression 4 Essential

List 9F- UT Settings (Pulser/Receiver Tab)

Item Required or Recommended/ Default Settings

Essential / Non-Essential

Configuration Phased array pulse echo Essential Pulser Element number 1 Essential Voltage (all channels) 200 V Essential Pulse width 333 ns Essential Receiver Pulser Essential Scale type LIN Essential Rectification Bipolar Essential High-pass 0.5 MHz Essential Low-pass 5 MHz Essential Smoothing No smoothing Essential

List 9G- UT Settings (Probe Tab)

Item Required or Recommended/ Default Settings

Essential / Non-Essential

Wave List 5 Essential Sound velocity List 6 Essential Probe name Probe Non-essential Modify Probe-T (Wedge delay) Paragraph 5.5.3 Essential Modify Probe-T (Scan axis offset)

Paragraph 6.3.3 Essential

Modify Probe-T (Index axis offset) Paragraph 6.3.3

Essential

Modify Probe-T (Refracted angle)

0 Essential

Modify Probe-T (Skew angle) 0 Essential

A-38

Modify Probe-R (Wedge delay) Do Not Change Essential Modify Probe-R (Scan axis offset)

Do Not Change Essential

Modify Probe-R (Index axis offset)

Do Not Change Essential

Modify Probe-R (Refracted angle)

Do Not Change Essential

Modify Probe-R (Skew angle) Do Not Change Essential Modify Law (Wedge delay) Do Not Change Essential Modify Law (Scan axis offset)

Do Not Change Essential

Modify Law (Index axis offset) Do Not Change Essential Modify Law (Refracted angle) Do Not Change Essential Modify Law (Skew angle) Do Not Change Essential

List 9H- UT Settings (Alarms Tab)

Item Required or Recommended/ Default Settings

Essential / Non-Essential

Output line Alarm 1 Essential Not Unchecked Essential Not Synchro Unchecked Essential Not Synchro Unused Essential Not Gate 1 Unchecked Essential Not Gate 1 Unused Essential Not Gate 2 Unchecked Essential Not Gate 2 Unused Essential Not Gate 3 Unchecked Essential Not Gate 3 Unused Essential Not Gate 4 Unchecked Essential Not Gate 4 Unused Essential

List 9I- UT Settings (I/O Tab)

Item Required or Recommended/ Default Settings

Essential / Non-Essential

General outputs #1 Unchecked Essential General outputs #2 Unchecked Essential General outputs #3 Unchecked Essential General outputs #4 Unchecked Essential General outputs #5 Unchecked Essential General outputs #6 Unchecked Essential

List 9J- UT Settings (Transmitter Tab)

Item Required or Recommended/ Default Settings

Essential / Non-Essential

First element Do Not Change Essential Current element Do Not Change Essential On Do Not Change Essential Delay Do Not Change Essential

A-39

List 9K- UT Settings (Receiver Tab)

Item Required or Recommended/ Default Settings

Essential / Non-Essential

First element Do Not Change Essential Current element Do Not Change Essential On Do Not Change Essential Delay Do Not Change Essential Gain Do Not Change Essential Sum gain Do Not Change Essential

12.2. The inspection settings provided in Lists 10A through 10D are specific for the UT instrument and motion control system (including manipulator) that was qualified during performance demonstration. Additionally, Lists 10E – 10F provide settings if a MCDU motion control system is used. Any alternative motion control systems (including manipulators) is acceptable for use as long as they can perform the scanning requirements identified within this procedure. When alternative motion control systems are utilized, the requirements identified for scan and index resolutions and scan and index speeds shall be maintained.

List 10A- Inspection Settings (Sequence Tab)

Item Required or Recommended/ Default Settings

Essential / Non-Essential

Fire on Encoder Essential Type Bidirectional Essential Index axis preset None Essential Range Unselected Essential Stop Selected Essential Scan Start Paragraph 6.3.3 Essential Scan Stop Paragraph 6.3.3 Essential Scan Resolution 1 mm (Maximum) Essential Scan Speed Paragraph 6.4.1 Essential Scan Unit Mm Essential Scan Preset Never Non-Essential Scan Preset value 0 Non-Essential Index Start Paragraph 6.3.3 Essential Index Stop Paragraph 6.3.3 Essential Index Resolution Paragraph 6.3.3 Essential Index Speed 38.1 mm/s (Maximum) Essential Index Unit Mm Essential Index Preset Never Non-Essential Index Preset value 0 Non-Essential

A-40

List 10B- Inspection Settings (Sequence Controls Tab)

Item Required or Recommended/ Default Settings

Essential / Non-Essential

Use current sequence only Checked Essential Show file size Unchecked Essential Enable pause acquisition Unchecked Essential

List 10C- Inspection Settings (Encoders Tab)

Item Required or Recommended/ Default Settings

Essential / Non-Essential

Encoder 1 Name Any Non-essential

Encoder 1/Wheels (Type) Quadrature Non-essential

Encoder 1/Wheels (Resolution) Paragraph 4.7 Non-essential

Encoder 1/Wheels (Invert) Paragraph 6.1.4 Non-essential

Encoder 2 Name Any Non-essential

Encoder 2/Arm (Type) Quadrature Non-essential

Encoder 2/Arm (Resolution) Paragraph 4.7 Non-essential

Encoder 2/Arm (Invert) Paragraph 6.1.4 Non-essential

Save Unchecked Non-essential

List 10D- Inspection Settings (Options Tab)

Item Required or Recommended/ Default Settings

Essential / Non-Essential

Directory Any Non-essential

Root name Any Non-essential

Counter value Any Non-essential

Prompt Selected Non-essential

External File Unchecked Non-essential

A-41

List 10E- Inspection Settings (MCDU control Tab w/ MCDU)

Item Required or Recommended/ Default Settings

Essential / Non-Essential

Motor 1/Wheels (Tuning Speed) 12 mm/s Non-essential Motor 1/Wheels (Invert polarity) See Paragraph 6.1.4 Non-essential Motor 1/Wheels (Destination) 0 Non-essential Motor 1/Wheels (Joystick) Unchecked Non-essential Motor 2/Arm (Tuning Speed) 25 mm/s Non-essential Motor 2/Arm (Invert polarity) See Paragraph 6.1.4 Non-essential Motor 2/Arm (Destination) 0 Non-essential Motor 2/Arm (Joystick) Unchecked Non-essential

List 10F- Inspection Settings (MCDU I/O Tab w/ MCDU)

Item Required or Recommended/ Default Settings

Essential / Non-Essential

Motor 1/Wheels (High limit switch) Unchecked Non-essential Motor 1/Wheels (Invert limit) Unchecked Non-essential Motor 1/Wheels (Invert home) Unchecked Non-essential Motor 1/Wheels (Invert index) Unchecked Non-essential Motor 2/Arm (High limit switch) Unchecked Non-essential Motor 2/Arm (Invert limit) Unchecked Non-essential Motor 2/Arm (Invert home) Unchecked Non-essential Motor 2/Arm (Invert index) Unchecked Non-essential Relay 0 Unchecked Non-essential Relay 1 Unchecked Non-essential

B-1

B APPENDIX

Receipt Inspection of Single Phased Array Probe Transducer and Wedges for Piping Welds

A White Paper in support of

“Procedure for Automated Single Phased-Array Probe Ultrasonic Flaw Detection and Length Sizing in Ferritic and Austenitic Piping Welds (EPRI-SPA-1)”

This White Paper describes steps that EPRI takes to ensure proper functionality when receiving a new phased array probe.

1 Purpose a. This document defines a set of measurements performed by EPRI upon initial

receipt of phased array transducers and wedges. b. The purpose of the measurements is to verify that all the array’s elements are

functioning and that they are wired to the correct pins on the array’s connector, and to verify that the wedge produces the correct beam angles and skews, with the correct beam exit points.

2 Array active element count a. The array (without a wedge) is placed on a flat block. instrument. b. The instrument is programmed with a special set of focal laws. The first focal law

pulses only element number 1 and receives using only element number 1. The second law uses only element number 2. In this fashion, the number of focal laws is equal to the number of elements, and each element has a unique focal law.

c. The set of focal laws is executed and the resultant sector scan is recorded. d. The sector scan is displayed. The responses of interest are the reflections from

the contact surface. e. Record the numbers of any elements that do not produce a response. These are

the dead elements. The response amplitudes for all the active elements should be about the same, within 6dB or so.

i. Dead elements will be apparent by the lack of any ultrasonic response. ii. The sound path for each backwall response should be the same for all

elements. 3 Array active element count and wiring check

a. The array is mounted on a wedge and connected to the phased array instrument. b. The instrument is programmed with a special set of focal laws. The first focal law

pulses only element number 1 and receives using only element number 1. The second law uses only element number 2. In this fashion, the number of focal laws is equal to the number of elements, and each element has a unique focal law.

c. The set of focal laws is executed, once, in air, not coupled to any test block. The resultant sector scan is recorded.

d. The sector scan is displayed. The responses of interest are the reflections from the contact surface of the wedge (in air, for this test).

B-2

e. Record the numbers of any elements that do not produce a response. These are the dead elements. The response amplitudes for all the active elements should be about the same, within 6dB or so.

i. The responses from the elements located toward the top of the wedge might be lower, because they have a longer plastic path; if necessary, this measurement can be repeated without a wedge on a flat plate, using the backwall responses to compare element amplitudes.

ii. Dead elements will be apparent by the lack of any ultrasonic response. f. Verify that the sound paths of the wedge surface responses follow the expected

pattern. i. For a linear array, the sound path for the element lowest on the wedge

should be the shortest. The sound path for the element highest on the wedge should be the longest. The sound paths for all the elements between should appear at the expected sound paths relative to the endmost elements. If elements are mis-wired, this will be apparent in the pattern of sound paths. An example is shown in Figure 1, which shows a sector scan produced by two 64-element arrays that are nominally identical, mounted on 18-degree wedges.

1. The horizontal axis of the display is time, the vertical axis is element number, and the colors represent amplitude. The red area at the left is the initial pulse.

2. The image contains two diagonal responses, one smooth and one choppy. The smooth one is the response of the elements in one of the arrays, which was wired correctly. The time step from one element to the next is constant. The choppy one is from the other array, which was wired incorrectly; blocks of four elements were transposed alternately along the array. It’s immediately apparent that the wiring is incorrect.

3. Note that the amplitude of the response from the elements lowest on the wedge (shortest time – toward the left in the image) is much higher than the amplitude of the elements highest on the wedge. This is due to attenuation in the plastic, so this test would not be appropriate for testing the constancy of element sensitivity per item 3e(i) above.

ii. For a matrix array, the principle is the same but the pattern of sound paths is a little more complex.

4 Wedge verification – beam skew (Method 1) a. These steps are performed only if the array/wedge combination is intended to

perform a skewing function. This will be the case for some 2D arrays, and for linear arrays that are mounted laterally on the wedge.

b. The array is mounted on the wedge and connected to the phased array instrument.

c. Consider the set of beam angles and skews that the array/wedge combination will be called upon to generate. Identify, for each beam skew, the highest and lowest beam angles that will be used. Program the system with focal laws that will generate these angle/skew combinations in the material of interest.

d. For each focal law (angle/skew combination) identified in step (c), perform the following steps:

i. Set the instrument to display a live A-scan using the selected focal law. ii. Place the probe at the center of the 4” radius of an IIW block, or

alternative reference block such as the one shown in Figure 4, of the material of interest. Rotate the probe to obtain the response from the radiused surface.

B-3

iii. Maximize the response by rotating the probe and adjusting its axial position on the block.

iv. When the response is maximized, measure the skew of the probe. Here is one good way to do this:

1. Draw a pencil line on the reference block along one edge of the wedge.

2. Remove the wedge. Use a sliding T-bevel tool to preserve the angle of the pencil line relative to the side of the reference block.

3. Use a protractor to measure the angle from the T-bevel. v. Record the measured skew.

e. Make a record, such as a chart or table, of the measured skews versus the programmed (intended) skews.

f. The RMS value of the skew errors (measured minus intended) should be less than 3 degrees.

i. A few settings might have skew errors greater than 3 degrees. Keep these cases in mind if these specific, higher-error focal laws will be used in a function that requires high accuracy of skew.

ii. The average skew error should be close to zero degrees. If there is a significantly nonzero skew error, while the RMS value of the error is small, then the wedge is biased; it is not cut the way it was supposed to be. Test the wedge using a flat focal law (same delay for all elements) and an IIW block to determine what its actual angles are.

5 Wedge verification – beam skew (Method 2) a. These steps are performed only if the array/wedge combination is intended to

perform a skewing function. This will be the case for some 2D arrays, and for linear arrays that are mounted laterally on the wedge.

b. The array is mounted on the wedge and connected to the phased array instrument.

c. Consider the set of beam angles and skews that the array/wedge combination will be called upon to generate. Identify, for each beam skew, the highest and lowest beam angles that will be used. Program the system with focal laws that will generate these angle/skew combinations in the material of interest.

d. Collect ultrasonic data on a sample with skewed notches or flaws. (See Figure 5) e. If all the skewed notches or flaws are detected then the generated skew angles

are adequate for inspection and are valid. (See Figure 6) 6 Wedge verification – beam angles

a. Steps b-e below are to be performed at each skew value that the probe will be used for. If the skew angles have already been verified then steps b-e below are to be performed at the zero degree skew value.

b. Program the instrument to generate a sector scan at a specific skew value of interest, focusing at a specific depth of interest.

c. Place the probe on a side-drilled hole block such as the one in Figure 4. Rotate the probe to the programmed skew value, so that the beams are pointed at the holes.

d. Perform a single scan stroke toward the holes. Record the sector scans along with the encoded probe position. Acquire data at a spacing of 0.1” or less. (See Figure 7)

e. (This step contains features specific to R/Dtech’s TomoView software.) In analysis mode, perform a volumetric merge of the data. Display the Volume-Corrected Side View of the merged data. Use cursors to measure the error in depth position and axial position of the SDH nearest the focal depth. Record the error.

f. The error in the measured depth position of the selected SDH should be less than 10%, for array/wedge combinations and focal laws to be used for crack detection and length sizing in piping. Other applications may require greater accuracy.

B-4

Figure 1. Sector scan used for testing two 64-element arrays for correct wiring. The top half shows the response of an array that is wired correctly; the bottom half shows the response of an array that is wired incorrectly.

Figure 2. Sector and A-scan used for testing “single” phased array probe without wedge. Channels 93-96 and Channels 123 to 125 are inactive by design.

B-5

Figure 3. Sector and A-scan used for testing “single” phased array probe with 30 degree wedge. Channels 93-96 and Channels 123 to 125 are inactive by design.

B-6

Hole # Location From Top (in) 1 0.250 2 0.500 3 0.750 4 1.000 5 1.500 6 2.000 7 2.500 8 3.000 9 3.500

Figure 4. Alternative calibration block.

B-7

Figure 5. Austenitic Weld Sample Containing EDM Notches (Notch skew angle in degrees shown above

notch). Figure 6. Shear Wave Ultrasonic Image (Circumferential & Axial EDM Notches)

B-8

Figure 7. Scan of reference block using 45-degree shear and longitudinal waves.

Table. Shear and Longitudinal Wave Depth Errors Wave Mode Beam Angle

(deg) Hole Depth

(mm) Hole Depth Error

(mm) Hole Depth Error

(%) Shear 40 25.4 -0.30 -1.2 Shear 40 38.1 0.50 1.3 Shear 45 25.4 -0.10 -0.4 Shear 45 38.1 -0.30 -0.8 Shear 49 25.4 -1.10 -4.3 Shear 49 38.1 -1.70 -4.5

Longitudinal 43 25.4 -0.42 -1.7 Longitudinal 43 38.1 -0.30 -0.8 Longitudinal 45 25.4 -0.60 -2.4 Longitudinal 45 38.1 0.41 1.1 Longitudinal 50 25.4 -2.26 -8.9 Longitudinal 50 38.1 -0.72 -1.9

C-1

C APPENDIX

Effect of De-activating Seven out of Twenty-Eight Elements of a Phased Array Probe

A White Paper in support of

“Procedure for Automated Single Phased-Array Probe Ultrasonic Flaw Detection and Length

Sizing in Ferritic and Austenitic Piping Welds (EPRI-SPA-1)” This White Paper is intended to serve as supporting technical information for a demonstration of the subject procedure in accordance with ASME Code, Section XI, Appendix VIII, as administered by the Performance Demonstration Initiative (PDI).

Introduction

Industry experience has shown that through normal wear and tear, some of the individual array elements in a phased array system can be expected to be eventually rendered temporarily or permanently inactive. This might occur due to decoupling of the element from the wedge, failure of the element’s electric connections, failure of the cable connecting the element to the instrument, or failure of the pulser or receiver that is connected to the element. Array probes and cables are expensive, so it would not be cost-effective to consider them to be unusable if only a few of their elements are inactive. Further, it would not be cost-effective if a series of examinations was to be considered invalid if it was found that during the examinations a single element had become inactive. It is necessary to be able to use a phased array system without all its array elements operating. EPRI’s “Procedure for Automated Single Phased-Array Probe Ultrasonic Flaw Detection and Length Sizing in Ferritic and Austenitic Piping Welds” uses arrays that have a minimum of 28 elements arranged in a two-dimensional matrix. The initial draft of the procedure stated that each array would be still usable if at least 21of its elements are active, and declares that the number of active elements is an essential variable. The demonstration of this procedure in the PDI program is planned to be performed with seven of the elements deliberately turned off. This White Paper presents experiments that were performed before the PDI demonstration in order to determine which seven elements should be turned off during the demonstration. The experiments included random selections of elements, and non-random selections intended to represent worst cases. The report concludes that different selections of inactive elements do not produce significantly different ultrasonic examination (UT) performance.

C-2

Experiments

Selection of elements to deactivate. Array probe manufacturers indicate that there is no industry experience of a spatial pattern in degradation of array elements with service. There is no reason to expect any particular element or set of elements to fail earliest. For experiments performed in support of this document, random selections of elements were made. The procedure uses both single-array and dual-array probe configurations. In the dual configuration, if any significant beam-shape effects are introduced by a particular selection of inactivated elements in one array, those effects should be mitigated by convolution with the beam-shape effects of the inactive elements in the other array, which would presumably have a different pattern. In the single-array case, the transmitting set of elements is the same as the receiving set of elements, so any beam-shape effects will be maximized. Therefore, the single-array probe is the conservative case and was selected for this investigation. This probe is used for detecting axially-oriented flaws. In addition to the random selections of elements, the probable worst-case selection was investigated. The row of elements nearest the weld was turned off, which has the effect of moving the beam index away from the weld. Proximity of the beam index to the weld crown is known to be an essential parameter for detection of axial IGSCC. No other selection of inactive elements could have as large a negative effect on index position. Setup. The single probe array was mounted on a wedge designed for detection of axial cracking. The TomoScan III/PA instrument driving the probe was programmed to execute the electronic scan pattern defined in the procedure. This electronic scan pattern includes 11 beam angles from 35° to 60°, each produced at four skew angles from 35° to 67.5°, for a total of 55 shear beams produced at each probe position. An austenitic pipe sample containing a Non-IGSCC axially oriented flaw was fitted with a track for automated scanning. Experimental design. Two different random selections of array elements were prepared using a random number generator function in Microsoft Excel. As a worst-case non-random selection, the entire front row of seven elements would be turned off. Finally, as a control case, a setup was prepared with no inactive elements. Selected elements were deactivated by software control. The programming necessary to generate a single, specific beam is called a “focal law.” All the focal laws and scan parameters for this experiment were calculated assuming that all the elements were functional. It would have been possible to optimize individually for each case, but in the interest of simplicity and conservatism this was not done. Expected results. It is expected that the effect of turning off a few elements would be to cause a loss in sensitivity according to the reduction in radiating area:

Effect = 2 * 20 * log(21/28) = -5.0 dB The factor of 2 accounts for the losses incurred in both transmission and reception. It is not expected that the beam direction would be affected significantly. It is useful to think first of the analogous situation in conventional probes, which is a partial decoupling of the transducer from the wedge. If, for example, the transducer in a 60° probe is partially decoupled from the wedge, it’s still a 60° probe; the only thing that has changed is the shape of the effective radiator. The angle would no more be expected to change with this coupling degradation than it would be expected to change if a round crystal was replaced by a square one. The determining factor is the shape of the wedge, not the shape of the radiator.

C-3

In the case of a phased array probe, the beam direction is controlled by adjusting individually the pulse and reception delays of each array element. Adjusting these delays is exactly analogous to changing the angle of the wedge -- a wedge is a mechanical means of selectively delaying different parts of the sound beam, while a phased array instrument is an electronic means of doing the same thing. For an array on any specific wedge, using any specific focal law, turning off a few elements changes only the shape of the radiator, not the effect of either the mechanical (wedge) or the electronic (delay law) controls on the beam direction. The effect of the proposed worst-case element selection would be to move the beam index farther from the weld crown toe. It is not expected that this shift would influence the detection capability for axial flaws. Actual results. The data was analyzed using the Volumetric Merge function of the TomoView software. Data from individual beam directions is not viewed individually; rather, the analyst views images constructed using all the beam angles at once. This is the analysis method employed by the procedure. Flaw images created using the reference case (all elements active), case 1 (random seven), case 2 (random seven), and case 3 (front seven) selections of inactive array elements are shown in the Figure 1 below respectively from top to bottom. Comparisons between the reference and inactive element cases can also be found in Figures 2a though 2c at the end of this report. For each “VC-Side” image, the “contour” tool was used to determine the maximum amplitude, the axial position at the maximum amplitude, the circumferential position at the maximum amplitude, and the depth position at the maximum amplitude in the area of the flaw. All the “VC-Side” images are shown with 9.0 dB of soft gain for display purposes. The images obtained using random selections of inactive elements (case 1 & case 2) are virtually identical to one another. Differences in individual pixels can be identified, and the position of the reflector’s maximum varies by a pixel sometimes, but these deviations are no greater than the normal unrepeatibility of inspection results using any ultrasonic technology, and are not significant in terms of the procedure’s objectives, which are to identify and size flaws. The effect of turning off the front row of elements (case 3), the non-random selection that was expected to be the most conservative. The ability to image the axial flaw was not affected. The calculated position of the reflector was not noticeably affected in the axial direction, because of the change in the beam index position when the front row of elements is deactivated.

C-4

Figure1. Reference, Case 1, Case 2, and Case 3 Inactive Elements Images

The quantitative effect of the different selections of inactive elements is shown in the table below.

Table. Inactive Elements Quantitative Results Deviation from reference case (all elements turned on)

Inactive Element Amplitude (dB) Axial position (mm) Circ. Position (mm) Depth (mm)

Random 7 (Case 1) -4.2 0.50 0.00 1.00

Random 7 (Case 2) -3.6 0.00 -1.00 0.50

Front 7 (Case 3) -1.6 0.00 -1.00 0.50

Average -3.1 0.17 -0.67 0.67

The maximum deviation in axial position of 0.5 mm is actually seen in the first random selection (case 1). This will have no effect on data analysis, since all features in the data are offset by the same amount, and therefore the spatial features used for flaw discrimination are not affected. The theoretical amount of dB loss form deactivating seven out of twenty-eight elements is 5.0 dB. The maximum dB loss (4.2 dB) can be seen from case 1. This dB loss should not impact flaw detection or sizing because the acquisition system has 24 dB of dynamic range when collecting 12-bit data. Therefore more bits are used to represent the amplitude of the signal (as compared to 8-bit data) and the operator is able to scan at a lower gain setting. The color palette control can then be used in analysis to add a sufficient amount of “soft gain” for flaw detection and sizing. As a result, setting the gain level to 4.2 dB below the scanning sensitivity should not influence the final results.

C-5

Conclusions

EPRI makes the following conclusions based on the data presented above:

• The loss of seven out of twenty-eight elements does not significantly affect detection and sizing results.

• It doesn’t matter which seven are lost. • The only significant effect of element loss is loss of sensitivity according to radiating area. This

sensitivity loss is expected to be no more than 5.0 dB. • The 24 dB dynamic range of 12-bit data and the color palette can be used during analysis to help

compensate for a 5.0 dB loss.

Recommendations

EPRI makes the following recommendations:

• The PDI demonstration of this procedure should be performed with seven elements of each array deliberately inactivated. A successful demonstration would qualify the procedure for use as long as each array has no more than seven inactive elements.1

• PDI should select promptly, or should promptly allow EPRI to select, the specific elements that will be inactivated for the demonstration. EPRI suggests using the worst-case selection shown above (case 1). EPRI would like to enter the qualification with data acquisition setups already prepared, and they can’t be prepared until it’s known which elements must be turned off.

1 The only way to intentionally de-activate selected elements is by software control. The instructions that control the elements is in the data acquisition setup file. The setup files used in the demonstration will be saved by PDI as part of the demonstration records. It is important to note that any time the procedure will be used in the field, it would not use the exact same setup files as were used during the demonstration, because of course it would not be desirable to perform inspections with good elements deliberately shut off.

C-6

Figure 2a. Effect of deactivating

seven of the 28 elements (Reference versus Case 1). Case 1 random selection of seven deactivated elements are shown, along with the reference case (all elements on). Inactive elements indicated in red.

Figure 2b. Effect of deactivating

seven of the 28 elements (Reference versus Case 2). Case 2 random selection of seven deactivated elements are shown, along with the reference case (all elements on). Inactive elements indicated in red.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Reference Case (All Elements

On)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 1415 16 17 18 19 20 2122 23 24 25 26 27 28Case 1 (Random 7

Off)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 1415 16 17 18 19 20 2122 23 24 25 26 27 28Case 2 (Random 7

Off)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Reference Case (All Elements

On)

C-7

Figure 2c. Effect of deactivating

seven of the 28 elements (Reference versus Case 3). Case 3 front row of seven deactivated elements are shown, along with the reference case (all elements on). Inactive elements indicated in red.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Reference Case (All Elements

On)

1 2 3 4 5 6 78 9 10 11 12 13 14

15 16 17 18 19 20 2122 23 24 25 26 27 28

Case 3 (Front 7 Off)

Electric Power Research Institute 3420 Hillview Avenue, Palo Alto, California 94304-1338 • PO Box 10412, Palo Alto, California 94303-0813 • USA

800.313.3774 • 650.855.2121 • askepri@epri.com • www.epri.com

WARNING: This Document contains information classified under U.S. Export control regulations as restricted from export outside the United States. You are under an obligation to ensure that you have a legal right to obtain access to this information and to ensure that you obtain an export license prior to any re-export of this information. Special restrictions apply to access by anyone that is not a United States citizen or a permanent United States resident. For further information regarding your obligations, please see the information contained below in the section entitled “Export Control Restrictions.”

Export Control Restrictions

Access to and use of EPRI Intellectual Property is granted with the specific understanding and requirement that responsibility for ensuring full compliance with all applicable U.S. and foreign export laws and regulations is being undertaken by you and your company. This includes an obligation to ensure that any individual receiving access hereunder who is not a U.S. citizen or permanent U.S. resident is permitted access under applicable U.S. and foreign export laws and regulations. In the event you are uncertain whether you or your company may lawfully obtain access to this EPRI Intellectual Property, you acknowledge that it is your obligation to consult with your company’s legal counsel to determine whether this access is lawful. Although EPRI may make available on a case-by-case basis an informal assessment of the applicable U.S. export classification for specific EPRI Intellectual Property, you and your company acknowledge that this assessment is solely for informational purposes and not for reliance purposes. You and your company acknowledge that it is still the obligation of you and your company to make your own assessment of the applicable U.S. export classification and ensure compliance accordingly. You and your company understand and acknowledge your obligations to make a prompt report to EPRI and the appropriate authorities regarding any access to or use of EPRI Intellectual Property hereunder that may be in violation of applicable U.S. or foreign export laws or regulations.

The Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI)

The Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI), with major locations in Palo Alto, California, and Charlotte, North Carolina, was established in 1973 as an independent, nonprofit center for public interest energy and environmental research. EPRI brings together members, participants, the Institute’s scientists and engineers, and other leading experts to work collaboratively on solutions to the challenges of electric power. These solutions span nearly every area of electricity generation, delivery, and use, including health, safety, and environment. EPRI’s members represent over 90% of the electricity generated in the United States. International participation represents nearly 15% of EPRI’s total research, development, and demonstration program.

Together…Shaping the Future of Electricity

© 2006 Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI), Inc. All rights reserved. Electric Power Research Institute and EPRI are registered service marks of the Electric Power Research Institute, Inc.

Printed on recycled paper in the United States of America 1014656