Pharmacists Perceptions of the Development of Herbal Medicines in Iran

Asghari G.

Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, I.R.Iran

Objectives Identify pharmacists overall

assessments of the WHO-TRM Strategy components influencing the development of herbal medicine market in Iran.

In Iran, although the sale of herbal medicine is growing, at present its share in the drug market is <5%.

Methods:elements assessed Access: affordibility, supply, distrubution,

market expansion, health insurance coverage, price

Rational use: provider training, consumer information, public information, commercial advertizing, student education

Safety, efficacy, quailty: pharmacovigilance, packeging and lebelling, quality assurance, clinical trial, new dosage form

Regulation: registration , integration to NHS, legal consideration, licensing, auditing

Questionnaire used

The 20 questions consisted of 5 items addressing safety, efficacy, and quality of herbal medicines, 5 items about the rational use, 5 items about the access to herbal medicines, and 5 items about regulation.

A five – point Likert rating scale was used for the final 20-item with choices strongly agree, agree, somewhat agree, disagree, and strongly disagree.

Subjects

72 community retail pharmacists practicing in Isfahan city in private pharmacy were participate to complete the survey. Data were collected by self-administered questionnaire.

After their continuing education course, pharmacists were asked to complete a written survey evaluating elements that can influence the development of herbal medicine in Iran .

This is where a large graphic or chart can go.

3.5

3.55

3.6

3.65

3.7

3.75

3.8

3.85

Mea

n o

f p

har

mac

ists

p

erce

pti

on

s

Access Regulation Rational use Safety, eficacy,quaility

Elements assessed

Comparison of pharmacists perceptions of elements influencing herbal medicine market in Iran

Results:

In the safety, efficacy and quality section, there were significant differences between efficacy and others. The results showed that pharmacists believe poor efficacy in herbal product negatively influence their market.

There was a significant difference in access section between cost and availability.

The results demonstrated that the pharmacist perceptions of development of herbal medicines vary from access and regulation items to safety, efficacy, quality and rational use items.

Conclusion :

Since this data were collected to assess the perception of specific city pharmacist, they may not necessarily show the reality and may not nationally applicable or acceptable.

Iran health system needs to evaluate their herbal medicine market by various methods in order to promote their herbal medicine market to meet health care demands.

Challenging methodological issues:

Reliability and validity in the collection of data:

pretest group, clarity, wording, representative

use of questionnaires in multi cultural society, (questions of quality, rational use, safety are strongly determined by the cultural context.)

Complexity of the herbal medicines use: Influence of social factors, cultural

factors, definition of health ( herbal medicine is the best solution)

Limitation: what people think or what they are willing to report is not necessarily the same as what actually happens.

Question should be included in future research: Public Demand Marketing mechanisms Level and distribution of wealth in the

country Affordability of professional care Affordability of traditional herbal

materials

Free access to formal medical care

Number of pharmacies number of traditional healer availability of professional care Availability of drug Availability of traditional market

Behavioral factors:

pharmacist dispensing behavior patient compliance illness behavior attitude of health professionals attitude to health Cultural values: