petra hoelscher unicef namibia

20
How effective are social grants in supporting families? Tax-benefit model family analysis 3 rd ISCI Conference, York, 27-29 July 2011 Petra Hoelscher UNICEF Namibia

Upload: reed-baker

Post on 01-Jan-2016

77 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Petra Hoelscher UNICEF Namibia. How effective are social grants in supporting families? Tax-benefit model family analysis 3 rd ISCI Conference, York, 27-29 July 2011. 2 nd lowest population density in the world. Some scenery. Highest sand dunes in the world. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Petra  Hoelscher UNICEF Namibia

How effective are social grants in supporting families? Tax-benefit model family analysis

3rd ISCI Conference, York, 27-29 July 2011

Petra Hoelscher

UNICEF Namibia

Page 2: Petra  Hoelscher UNICEF Namibia

2nd lowest population density in the world

Page 3: Petra  Hoelscher UNICEF Namibia

Some scenery

Highest sand dunes in the world

Page 4: Petra  Hoelscher UNICEF Namibia

Highest income inequality in the world

20 30 40 50 60 70 800

20

40

60

80

100

120

GINI coefficient

Ra

tio

of

the

ric

he

st

10

% t

o t

he

po

ore

st

10

%

NAMIBIA

Angola

South Africa

Botswana

Japan

Source: UNDP HDR 2009

Page 5: Petra  Hoelscher UNICEF Namibia

1981 1990 20050

10

20

30

40

50

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

poverty GDP

Source: World Bank WDI and UNDESA 2009

Poverty rates (USD 1.25) & GDP per capita

Page 6: Petra  Hoelscher UNICEF Namibia

Namibia – one of the few African countries with government funded social grant system

Basic state grants – universal old age pensions and pension for people with disabilities: N$ 500

Child welfare grants – child maintenance grants (mainly for orphans), foster care grants and special maintenance grants (for children with disabilities): N$ 200

War veteran grants – for participants in liberation struggle: N$ 2000

Contributory social security – provisions for maternity, long term sickness, work-related accidents/illness/death

But system not geared towards poverty reduction

Page 7: Petra  Hoelscher UNICEF Namibia

Orphaned Children

(155,000)

Foster Children

Vulnerable & Poor

Children

Child Welfare Grants (127,000)

NHIES: Child poverty profile

Impact of social grants on poverty

Social Protection Qualitative

Assessment:How do poor children

live?

How do services and systems interact with poor families and their

children

Will Better inform programming outcomes

SA Study tourHow it will work in

practice

Expected costs, experiences &

lessons learned

Administrative processes

ST

RA

TE

GY

& T

HE

HO

W

Tax-benefit model family analysis:Visualises child

povertyPotential impact of

social grantsModelling impact of

alternative policy options

Different policy optionsModelling & costing of alternative policy options

Strategies for gradually phasing in

Page 8: Petra  Hoelscher UNICEF Namibia

Tax-benefit model family analysis

Mapping out for different typical model families different income levels (formal and informal) income taxes paid social contributions paid social grants received expenditure for child health package (children at different

ages) expenditure for education (urban/rural)

How much income is left for the family? How far away are they from the poverty line? Can social grants reduce poverty? Alternative policy options

Page 9: Petra  Hoelscher UNICEF Namibia

Basic assumptions Families have one earner Everybody in the formal sector pays tax and social contributions No private pensions & health insurance taken into account Anybody entitled to benefits gets them Child welfare grants paid to orphaned children Education cost include: school development fund, school

uniforms (incl. track suits), stationery, extra-curricular activities – costs in urban areas considered higher than in rural

Health cost include: annual clinic fees for children for standard health package: immunisation & growth monitoring for infants and U5, bednets for U5, health and dental check-ups for primary school children

Costs do not include transport to school or clinics

Page 10: Petra  Hoelscher UNICEF Namibia

Methodological challenges

Family structures are very complex and variable (for adults and children in the household), issue of kinship care, incl. for children with both parents alive

No reliable data on household composition from census or NHIES

Income difficult to estimate, often irregular Analysis focuses on low income jobs, covering majority of

population; 51.2% unemployment many families no income & no income support

Analysis applies consumption poverty line to income – home consumption, support from relatives, remittances etc. not taken into account

Poverty line comparatively low

Page 11: Petra  Hoelscher UNICEF Namibia

How to determine the poverty line

Poverty line NHIES 2003/04: N$ 262.45 per adult equivalent per month adults, 16 years and over – 1 children, 6-15 – 0.75 poverty line: N$ 196.84 children, 0-5 – 0.5 poverty line: N$ 131.23

Uprating based on Consumer Price Index

Food index 2003: 121.6 July 2010: 199.4

Adjusted poverty line: N$ 430.4 per adult equivalent per month adults, 16 years and over – 1 children, 6-15 – 0.75 poverty line: N$ 322.7 children, 0-5 – 0.5 poverty line: N$ 215.2

(Exchange rate: approx. N$ 7 –US$ 1, N$ 10 – 1 €)

Page 12: Petra  Hoelscher UNICEF Namibia

Case 1: 2 adults, 1 infant, 1 U5, 2 school age, urban

N$ 500 net N$ 1000 net N$ 2500 net N$ 5000 net

-2000

-1000

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

Earnings Basic state grant Child welfare grantSocial contributions Income tax Child health packageEducation package

poverty line

Page 13: Petra  Hoelscher UNICEF Namibia

Case 2: 2 adults, 1 infant, 1 U5, 2 school age, rural

poverty line

N$ 150 net N$ 700 net N$ 1000 net N$ 2500 net

-500

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

Earnings Basic state grant Child welfare grantSocial contributions Income tax Child health packageEducation package

Page 14: Petra  Hoelscher UNICEF Namibia

Case 3: 1 parent, 1 infant, 1 U5, 2 school age, all orphaned, urban

poverty line

N$ 500 net N$ 1000 net N$ 2500 net N$ 5000 net

-2000

-1000

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

Earnings Basic state grant Child welfare grantSocial contributions Income tax Child health packageEducation package

Page 15: Petra  Hoelscher UNICEF Namibia

income & costs net income

-1800

-1300

-800

-300

200

700

1200

1700

2200

2700

3200

EducationHealthChild grantsPensionsSocial securityEarnings

Case 4: 1 pensioner urban, 2 U5, 1 school age, 7 orphans (1 infant, 2 U5, 4 school age)

poverty line

Page 16: Petra  Hoelscher UNICEF Namibia

Policy option 1: universal child welfare grants2 adults, 1 infant, 1 U5, 2 school age, urban

poverty line

N$ 500 net N$ 1000 net N$ 2500 net N$ 5000 net

-2000

-1000

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

Earnings Basic state grant Child welfare grant

Social contributions Income tax Child health package

Education package

Page 17: Petra  Hoelscher UNICEF Namibia

Policy option 2: means-tested CWG @ N$ 36,000 p.a.2 adults, 1 infant, 1 U5, 2 school age, urban

poverty line

N$ 500 net N$ 1000 net N$ 2500 net N$ 5000 net

-2000

-1000

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

Earnings Basic state grant Child welfare grantSocial contributions Income tax Child health packageEducation package

Page 18: Petra  Hoelscher UNICEF Namibia

Summary of results

Low income families great difficulties to make ends meet – only family (2 adults, 4 children) with N$ 2500 above poverty line

Cost of education prohibitive for many families Tax threshold high enough to protect low income

families, social security contributions low enough to be affordable

Pensions and child welfare grants can be important contribution to families‘ income – but not reaching low income families

Pensions and child welfare grants alone cannot lift families out of poverty

Page 19: Petra  Hoelscher UNICEF Namibia

Orphaned Children

(155,000)

Foster Children

Vulnerable & Poor

Children

Child Welfare Grants (127,000)

NHIES: Child poverty profile

Impact of social grants on poverty

Social Protection Qualitative

Assessment:How do poor children

live?

How do services and systems interact with poor families and their

children

Will Better inform programming outcomes

SA Study tourHow it will work in

practice

Expected costs, experiences &

lessons learned

Administrative processes

ST

RA

TE

GY

& T

HE

HO

W

Tax-benefit model family analysis:Visualises child

povertyPotential impact of

social grantsModelling impact of

alternative policy options

Towards an integrated social protection framework for children:

National Development Plan 4NPA for Children

Policy options

Page 20: Petra  Hoelscher UNICEF Namibia

Thank you!

For more info:

[email protected]