perioperative infarcts: epidemiology, predictors and post-op monitoring · post-op monitoring •is...

40
Perioperative Infarcts: Epidemiology, predictors and post-op monitoring Dr Carol Chong Geriatrician Northern Health, Epping, Victoria, Australia Friday Nov 3rd, 2017 1pm

Upload: others

Post on 27-Mar-2020

4 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Perioperative Infarcts: Epidemiology, predictors and post-op monitoring · Post-op monitoring •Is screening indicated to detecting cardiac injury peri-operatively? –Perhaps for

Perioperative Infarcts:Epidemiology, predictors and

post-op monitoring

Dr Carol ChongGeriatrician

Northern Health, Epping, Victoria, Australia

Friday Nov 3rd, 2017 1pm

Page 2: Perioperative Infarcts: Epidemiology, predictors and post-op monitoring · Post-op monitoring •Is screening indicated to detecting cardiac injury peri-operatively? –Perhaps for

back

• Orthopaedic Intern, 1st job

• Aged Care registrar – Orthopaedic-geriatric unit

• Incidence of asymptomatic Troponin elevations after orthopaedic surgery

• RCT intervention

• M.D 2008-2011

How I became interested in this field

Page 3: Perioperative Infarcts: Epidemiology, predictors and post-op monitoring · Post-op monitoring •Is screening indicated to detecting cardiac injury peri-operatively? –Perhaps for

back

• How common are peri-op infarcts?

– Cardiac complications (MI, Heart Failure, VT) up to 5% of patients

– Mortality after MI in hospital 25-65% at 1 year

Epidemiology

Devereaux et al CMAJ 2005

Lowe et al Med J Aust 2006

Lowe et al Med J Aust 2006

Page 4: Perioperative Infarcts: Epidemiology, predictors and post-op monitoring · Post-op monitoring •Is screening indicated to detecting cardiac injury peri-operatively? –Perhaps for

back

How do we define an AMI after non-cardiac surgery?

• Third Universal definition of Myocardial Infarction

– Redefined in 2007, updated in 2012

– Emphasised rise and fall of cardiac markers with level above 99th percentile of upper reference range

– Together with symptoms of ischaemia or ECG changes

Thygesen et al 2007 J Am Coll Cardiol

Thygesen et al 2012 Circulation

Page 5: Perioperative Infarcts: Epidemiology, predictors and post-op monitoring · Post-op monitoring •Is screening indicated to detecting cardiac injury peri-operatively? –Perhaps for

back

• Type I: Spontaneous MI

• Type II: MI secondary to an ischaemic imbalance

• Type III: MI resulting in death when biomarker values are unavailable

• Type IVa: MI related to PCI

• Type IVb: MI related to stent thrombosis

• Type V: MI related to CABG

Universal Classification of MI

Thygesen et al 2012 Circulation

Page 6: Perioperative Infarcts: Epidemiology, predictors and post-op monitoring · Post-op monitoring •Is screening indicated to detecting cardiac injury peri-operatively? –Perhaps for

back

• Type 1 peri-op MI – traditional for pts with non-surgically related MI.

– Arterial thrombosis of coronary artery by plaque fissuring or acute luminal thrombosis in areas of stenosis

– Dawood et al, landmark study – Autopsy study –fatal post-op MI 42 pts

-significant atherosclerotic obstruction in >50%

-Site of infarct not necessarily site of most severe stenosis

2 proposed mechanisms

Dawood et al Int J Cardiol 1996

Page 7: Perioperative Infarcts: Epidemiology, predictors and post-op monitoring · Post-op monitoring •Is screening indicated to detecting cardiac injury peri-operatively? –Perhaps for

back

• Demand ischaemia – hemodynamic changes may relate to troponin abnormalities

• Angiography post- MI – presence of chronic severe coronary artery disease without thrombus or ulcerated plaques

• Imbalance between myocardial oxygen supply and demand

Type II peri-op MI

Modesti et al Intern Emerg Med 2006

McFalls et al Eur Hear J 2008

Page 8: Perioperative Infarcts: Epidemiology, predictors and post-op monitoring · Post-op monitoring •Is screening indicated to detecting cardiac injury peri-operatively? –Perhaps for

back

Peri-operative Myocardial Infarction

• Mostly silent eg. delirium, analgesics blunt pain sensation

• Either end of surgery or 24-96 hours later

• ECG changes non-Q wave

Sun et al Am Heart J 2007

Badner et al Anesthesiology 1998

Page 9: Perioperative Infarcts: Epidemiology, predictors and post-op monitoring · Post-op monitoring •Is screening indicated to detecting cardiac injury peri-operatively? –Perhaps for

back

Pathophysiology of peri-op MI

• Complex!

• Surgery sympathetic system

• Inflammation

• Hypoxia

• Increased pro inflammatory cytokines

• Platelet activation

• Hypercoagulable environment

• Oxygen demand Increases

Page 10: Perioperative Infarcts: Epidemiology, predictors and post-op monitoring · Post-op monitoring •Is screening indicated to detecting cardiac injury peri-operatively? –Perhaps for

back

The Cardiac Myocyte and Troponins

Page 11: Perioperative Infarcts: Epidemiology, predictors and post-op monitoring · Post-op monitoring •Is screening indicated to detecting cardiac injury peri-operatively? –Perhaps for

back

Troponin I

• Exists in 2 forms within myocardium

1. Cytosolic component 3% Troponin I

2. Structural (myofibrillar) form

• Unbound cytosolic component released acutely

– Concept of reversible ischaemia

• In practice, difficult to distinguish clincally

Page 12: Perioperative Infarcts: Epidemiology, predictors and post-op monitoring · Post-op monitoring •Is screening indicated to detecting cardiac injury peri-operatively? –Perhaps for

back

Incidence of post-op troponinelevations

• Orthopaedic series

– Incidence between 5.9 - 52.9%

• Studied mainly in the vascular population

– Incidence 8-33%

Jules-Elysse et al J Clin Anesth 2001

Mouzopoulos et al J Trauma 2007

Ausset et al Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2008

Dawson-Bowling et al Injury 2008

Chong et al Age Ageing 2009

Kim et al Circulation 2002

Landesberg et al J Am Coll Cardiol 2005

Oscarsson et al Acta Anaesthesia Scand 2004

Barbagallo et al J Clin Anesthesia 2006

Page 13: Perioperative Infarcts: Epidemiology, predictors and post-op monitoring · Post-op monitoring •Is screening indicated to detecting cardiac injury peri-operatively? –Perhaps for

back

• Incidence likely related to sensitivity of biomarker

• Biomarker of myocardial injury

• Non specific marker of illness

• Determining cause of troponin elevation helps to guide management

– For pts with a high pretest probability of ACS due to a thrombotic event, diagnostic value of troponin is useful

– Difficulty lies in troponin as a screening tool if patients with a low pre-test probability are tested

Troponin Issues

Page 14: Perioperative Infarcts: Epidemiology, predictors and post-op monitoring · Post-op monitoring •Is screening indicated to detecting cardiac injury peri-operatively? –Perhaps for

back

• Concept of Myocardial Infarction and Myocardial Injury after Noncardiac Surgery (MINS)

– Broader term than MI.

– Results in myocardial injury during (+/-necrosis) or within the first 30 days after non-cardiac surgery

– Prognostically relevant

– Due to an ischaemic etiology

– May not have the typical features eg. symptoms, ECG

MI and MINS

Botto et al Anaesthesiology 2014

Page 15: Perioperative Infarcts: Epidemiology, predictors and post-op monitoring · Post-op monitoring •Is screening indicated to detecting cardiac injury peri-operatively? –Perhaps for

back

• VISION study (Vascular Events in Noncardiac Surgical Patient Cohort Evaluation Study)

• Trop measured 6-12 hours after surgery and days 1,2,3 post op.

• 15,065 pts

• Trop >0.03ng/ml

• 11.6% post-op troponin elevation

• 8% MINS

MINS incidence

Botto et al Anaesthesiology 2014

Page 16: Perioperative Infarcts: Epidemiology, predictors and post-op monitoring · Post-op monitoring •Is screening indicated to detecting cardiac injury peri-operatively? –Perhaps for

back

• 41.8% fulfilled the universal definition of MI

• Only 15% with MINS had an ischaemic symptom

• 30 day mortality (115 pts) was 9.8% in MINS pts and 1.1% without.

• Vascular cause of death in 62 (53.9%)

• 10 fold mortality with Troponin >0.30

MINS incidence 8% (VISION)

Botto et al Anaesthesiology 2014

Page 17: Perioperative Infarcts: Epidemiology, predictors and post-op monitoring · Post-op monitoring •Is screening indicated to detecting cardiac injury peri-operatively? –Perhaps for

back

• MI and MINS – worse short and long term outcomes

• In hospital mortality after peri-op MI 5-25%

Prognosis

Devereaux et alCMAJ 2005

Badner Anesthesiology 1998

Page 18: Perioperative Infarcts: Epidemiology, predictors and post-op monitoring · Post-op monitoring •Is screening indicated to detecting cardiac injury peri-operatively? –Perhaps for

Levy et al Anesthesiology 2011

Page 19: Perioperative Infarcts: Epidemiology, predictors and post-op monitoring · Post-op monitoring •Is screening indicated to detecting cardiac injury peri-operatively? –Perhaps for
Page 20: Perioperative Infarcts: Epidemiology, predictors and post-op monitoring · Post-op monitoring •Is screening indicated to detecting cardiac injury peri-operatively? –Perhaps for

back

• 1977 Goldman et al created a risk evaluation system (NEJM)

• 1999 Lee et al – Revised Goldman Cardiac Risk Index

Predictors

Page 21: Perioperative Infarcts: Epidemiology, predictors and post-op monitoring · Post-op monitoring •Is screening indicated to detecting cardiac injury peri-operatively? –Perhaps for

back

Page 22: Perioperative Infarcts: Epidemiology, predictors and post-op monitoring · Post-op monitoring •Is screening indicated to detecting cardiac injury peri-operatively? –Perhaps for

back

Revised Goldman Cardiac Risk Index

Page 23: Perioperative Infarcts: Epidemiology, predictors and post-op monitoring · Post-op monitoring •Is screening indicated to detecting cardiac injury peri-operatively? –Perhaps for
Page 24: Perioperative Infarcts: Epidemiology, predictors and post-op monitoring · Post-op monitoring •Is screening indicated to detecting cardiac injury peri-operatively? –Perhaps for
Page 25: Perioperative Infarcts: Epidemiology, predictors and post-op monitoring · Post-op monitoring •Is screening indicated to detecting cardiac injury peri-operatively? –Perhaps for

back

• American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) Calculator

Other predictors

Page 26: Perioperative Infarcts: Epidemiology, predictors and post-op monitoring · Post-op monitoring •Is screening indicated to detecting cardiac injury peri-operatively? –Perhaps for

back

Page 27: Perioperative Infarcts: Epidemiology, predictors and post-op monitoring · Post-op monitoring •Is screening indicated to detecting cardiac injury peri-operatively? –Perhaps for

back

Page 28: Perioperative Infarcts: Epidemiology, predictors and post-op monitoring · Post-op monitoring •Is screening indicated to detecting cardiac injury peri-operatively? –Perhaps for

back

• Is screening indicated to detecting cardiac injury peri-operatively?

Post-op monitoring

Page 29: Perioperative Infarcts: Epidemiology, predictors and post-op monitoring · Post-op monitoring •Is screening indicated to detecting cardiac injury peri-operatively? –Perhaps for

Post-op monitoring

• Is screening indicated to detecting cardiac injury peri-operatively?

– Perhaps for high risk surgery

– Using Troponin and ECGs

• Recommendations

• 2014 ACC/AHA guidelines – usefulness uncertain

• 2014 European Society of Cardiology – may be considered

• 3rd Universal definition of MI – before and 48-72hrs after in high risk pt’s

Page 30: Perioperative Infarcts: Epidemiology, predictors and post-op monitoring · Post-op monitoring •Is screening indicated to detecting cardiac injury peri-operatively? –Perhaps for

back

1. Will the test change the care of my patient eg. Asymptomatic pt with Normal ECG and mild troponin elevation

2. What are the probability and potential adverse consequences of a false positive result eg. Anticoagulating, bleeding risk, PCI risk

3. Is the pt in danger in the short term if I do not perform the test?

Screening Issues

Beckman Circulation 2013

Page 31: Perioperative Infarcts: Epidemiology, predictors and post-op monitoring · Post-op monitoring •Is screening indicated to detecting cardiac injury peri-operatively? –Perhaps for
Page 32: Perioperative Infarcts: Epidemiology, predictors and post-op monitoring · Post-op monitoring •Is screening indicated to detecting cardiac injury peri-operatively? –Perhaps for

back

Troponin I

• Incidence of a troponin elevation post-operatively was 70/187 (37.4%)randomised.

• 12 patients had a post-op AMI (6.4%)

• SC: 5 patients 41.7% dead at 6 months

• CC: 7 patients 42.8% dead at 6 months

• 1 year mortality No difference between randomised groups

• 6/35 (17.1%) dead in each group (p=1.000)

• Troponin was a prognostic marker

Page 33: Perioperative Infarcts: Epidemiology, predictors and post-op monitoring · Post-op monitoring •Is screening indicated to detecting cardiac injury peri-operatively? –Perhaps for

back

• B blockers – POISE

• Aspirin and clonidine - POISE II

• Ivabradine and atorvastatin

• Dabigatran (a Direct Thrombin Inhibitor) and Omeprazole (a Proton-pump Inhibitor) in Patients Suffering Myocardial Injury after Noncardiac Surgery (ongoing Oct 2017) Devereaux

Preventative strategies

Page 34: Perioperative Infarcts: Epidemiology, predictors and post-op monitoring · Post-op monitoring •Is screening indicated to detecting cardiac injury peri-operatively? –Perhaps for

back

Page 35: Perioperative Infarcts: Epidemiology, predictors and post-op monitoring · Post-op monitoring •Is screening indicated to detecting cardiac injury peri-operatively? –Perhaps for

back

• Fewer in bblocker group 244 (5.8%) versus placebo 290 (6.9%) reached primary endpont (composite CV death, non fatal MI and nonfatal cardiac arrest)

• MI 5% at 30 days (4.2% bblocker vs 5.7% placebo)

• More death in bblocker group 29 (3.1%) vs 97 (2.3%) Hr 1.33, 1.03-1.74, p=0.0317)

• More stroke 41 (1%) vs 19 (0.5%) HR 2.17, 1.26-3.74, p=0.0053).

• Clinically significant hypotension and stroke explains increased risk of death

POISE Trial results-8351 pts at risk of atherosclerotic disease

Page 36: Perioperative Infarcts: Epidemiology, predictors and post-op monitoring · Post-op monitoring •Is screening indicated to detecting cardiac injury peri-operatively? –Perhaps for

back

Page 37: Perioperative Infarcts: Epidemiology, predictors and post-op monitoring · Post-op monitoring •Is screening indicated to detecting cardiac injury peri-operatively? –Perhaps for

back

Page 38: Perioperative Infarcts: Epidemiology, predictors and post-op monitoring · Post-op monitoring •Is screening indicated to detecting cardiac injury peri-operatively? –Perhaps for

back

Page 39: Perioperative Infarcts: Epidemiology, predictors and post-op monitoring · Post-op monitoring •Is screening indicated to detecting cardiac injury peri-operatively? –Perhaps for

back

• Few prospective RCTs in this field

• Newer cardiac Ix – Coronary calcium scores, Cardiac MRI

• Use of peri-op beta blockers controversial –eg. Duration of initiation prior to surgery, dose and titration

• Value of testing biomarkers peri-op needs more Ix.

Screening/Monitoring – more research needed

Page 40: Perioperative Infarcts: Epidemiology, predictors and post-op monitoring · Post-op monitoring •Is screening indicated to detecting cardiac injury peri-operatively? –Perhaps for

Summary

• Post-op AMI assoc with worse outcomes

• Troponin elevations confer a worse prognosis

• However, there are no validated treatments for asymptomatic troponin elevations post-op as yet – thus screening is not recommended