performance review research assistant block versiontitle: microsoft word - performance...

1
Performance ReviewClassified Research Assistant (NonStudent Positions) Classified Research Assistant: Performance Review (012014) Employee’s Name: UTD ID: Review Date: School: Supervisor: Performance Factors Exceeds Expectations Meets Expectations Fails to Meet Expectations Unsatisfactory Quality of Work: Accuracy, thoroughness, neatness Better than average, few errors Consistently satisfactory, occasional errors Frequent errors, careless Unsatisfactory, many errors Quantity of Work: Productive Output Does a good day’s work, better than average quantity Average, turns out required amount of work, seldom more Slow output frequently below required quantity Output inadequate to retain on job Dependability: Follows instructions, judgment Dependable in most respects Ordinarily dependable Frequently undependable Consistently undependable Compatibility: Attitude, ability to get along with others Quick to volunteer to work with and assist others Generally works well with and assists others Cooperates only when has to, frequent conflict with others Consistently does not work well with or assist others Attendance Seldom absent or late Average attendance record, usually on time Frequent absence and tardiness Attendance too poor to retain Supervisory/Teaching Ability Above average ability to supervise/teach Adequate skills in supervisory/teaching responsibility Has some difficulty with supervisory and teaching skills Exhibits little to no supervisory/teaching capabilities Overall Evaluation (check one): Exceeds Expectations Meets Expectations Fails to Meet Expectations Unsatisfactory Comments by Supervisor: Recommendations (check one) Retain: Yes No Reassign: Yes No Comments by Employee: Signatures (Supervisor should review performance evaluation with Employee) Supervisor Date Employee Date Dean Date

Upload: others

Post on 25-Jul-2020

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Performance Review Research Assistant Block VersionTitle: Microsoft Word - Performance Review_Research Assistant_Block Version Author: jxk134030 Created Date: 1/29/2014 10:41:18 AM

 Performance Review‐ Classified Research Assistant (Non‐Student Positions) 

Classified Research Assistant: Performance Review (01‐2014) 

 

Employee’s Name:            UTD ID:        Review Date: 

School:                Supervisor: 

Performance Factors  Exceeds Expectations  Meets Expectations  Fails to Meet Expectations 

Unsatisfactory 

Quality of Work: Accuracy, thoroughness, neatness 

Better than average, few errors 

Consistently satisfactory, occasional errors 

Frequent errors, careless  Unsatisfactory, many errors 

Quantity of Work: Productive Output 

Does a good day’s work, better than average quantity 

Average, turns out required amount of work, seldom 

more 

Slow output frequently below required quantity 

Output inadequate to retain on job 

Dependability: Follows instructions, judgment 

Dependable in most respects 

Ordinarily dependable  Frequently undependable 

Consistently undependable 

Compatibility: Attitude, ability to get along with others 

Quick to volunteer to work with and assist others 

Generally works well with and assists others 

Cooperates only when has to, frequent conflict 

with others 

Consistently does not work well with or assist 

others 

Attendance  Seldom absent or late  Average attendance record, usually on time 

Frequent absence and tardiness 

Attendance too poor to retain 

Supervisory/Teaching Ability 

Above average ability to supervise/teach 

Adequate skills in supervisory/teaching 

responsibility 

Has some difficulty with supervisory and teaching 

skills 

Exhibits little to no supervisory/teaching 

capabilities 

 

Overall Evaluation (check one):   Exceeds Expectations               Meets Expectations                 Fails to Meet Expectations                Unsatisfactory 

Comments by Supervisor:  

 

 

Recommendations (check one)   Retain:       Yes             No    Reassign:    Yes             No 

Comments by Employee: 

 

Signatures (Supervisor should review performance evaluation with Employee) 

 

Supervisor      Date        Employee      Date 

 

Dean      Date