performance report 2012
DESCRIPTION
Performance Report 2012TRANSCRIPT
HALF HOLLOW HILLS CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT
of Huntington and Babylon
2010 – 11 Performance ReportJune 4, 2012
Half Hollow Hills 2011 District Performance Report – June 4, 2012
District Profile 2010 - 2011
2
• Enrollment: 9,882
• Free - Reduced Lunch: 10%
• Limited English Proficient: 2%
• Special Education: 14%
• Race/Ethnic Origin§ Black or African American: 13%
§ Hispanic or Latino: 5%
§ Asian / Pacific Islander: 12%
§ White: 68%
§ Multiracial: 1%
• Annual Attendance Rate: 96%
Half Hollow Hills 2011 District Performance Report – June 4, 2012
District Accountability• English-Language Arts: Good Standing• Mathematics: Good Standing• Science: Good Standing• Graduation Rate: Good Standing
3
Half Hollow Hills 2011 District Performance Report – June 4, 2012
District Accountability• English-Language Arts: Good Standing• Mathematics: Good Standing• Science: Good Standing• Graduation Rate: Good Standing
3
Half Hollow Hills 2011 District Performance Report – June 4, 2012
District Accountability• English-Language Arts: Good Standing• Mathematics: Good Standing• Science: Good Standing• Graduation Rate: Good Standing
3
Highest status granted
Half Hollow Hills 2011 District Performance Report – June 4, 2012
District Assessment Statistics
• Total number of New York State Assessments
• 18,952§ 3-8 ELA: 4,731
§ 3-8 Math: 4,739§ 4 & 8 Science: 1,112
§ Regents Exams: 8,370
4
Half Hollow Hills 2011 District Performance Report – June 4, 2012
English - Language Arts
5
Half Hollow Hills 2011 District Performance Report – June 4, 2012
County and State Comparisons
6
ELA - Grade 3Percentage of Students Earning 3 or 4
0%
20.0%
40.0%
60.0%
80.0%
DistrictCounty
State
Half Hollow Hills 2011 District Performance Report – June 4, 2012
County and State Comparisons
7
ELA - Grade 4Percentage of Students Earning 3 or 4
0%
20.0%
40.0%
60.0%
80.0%
DistrictCounty
State
Half Hollow Hills 2011 District Performance Report – June 4, 2012
County and State Comparisons
8
ELA - Grade 5Percentage of Students Earning 3 or 4
0%
20.0%
40.0%
60.0%
80.0%
DistrictCounty
State
Half Hollow Hills 2011 District Performance Report – June 4, 2012
ELA Grades 3-5 Performance Levels
9
0
50
100
150
200
Chestnut Hill Forest Park Otsego Paumanok Signal Hill Sunquam Vanderbilt
162
185
168 169 170 168 165
116 115 116 116 116 116 116
School Performance AMO
NYS EffecJve Annual Measurable ObjecJve (AMO) is the lowest PI that the group can achieve and sJll achieve Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP).
Half Hollow Hills 2011 District Performance Report – June 4, 2012
ELA Grades 3-8 Performance Index
10
NYS EffecJve Annual Measurable ObjecJve (AMO) is the lowest PI that the group can achieve and sJll achieve Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP).
0
45
90
135
180
District Performance Index AMO
All Students
Disable
d
Black
Hispanic
Asian / Pacific
Islander
White
LEP
Econom
ically
Disadvantaged
Half Hollow Hills 2011 District Performance Report – June 4, 2012
County and State Comparisons
11
ELA - Grade 6Percentage of Students Earning 3 or 4
0%
20.0%
40.0%
60.0%
80.0%
DistrictCounty
State
Half Hollow Hills 2011 District Performance Report – June 4, 2012
County and State Comparisons
12
ELA - Grade 7Percentage of Students Earning 3 or 4
0%
20.0%
40.0%
60.0%
80.0%
DistrictCounty
State
Half Hollow Hills 2011 District Performance Report – June 4, 2012
County and State Comparisons
13
ELA - Grade 8Percentage of Students Earning 3 or 4
0%
20.0%
40.0%
60.0%
80.0%
DistrictCounty
State
Half Hollow Hills 2011 District Performance Report – June 4, 2012
ELA Grades 6 - 8 Performance Levels
14
NYS EffecJve Annual Measurable ObjecJve (AMO) is the lowest PI that the group can achieve and sJll achieve Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP).
50
80
110
140
170
200
Candlewood West Hollow
172 171
119 119
School Performance AMO
Half Hollow Hills 2011 District Performance Report – June 4, 2012
Mathematics
15
Half Hollow Hills 2011 District Performance Report – June 4, 2012
County and State Comparisons
16
Mathematics - Grade 3Percentage of Students Earning 3 or 4
0
0.225
0.450
0.675
0.900
DistrictCounty
State
Half Hollow Hills 2011 District Performance Report – June 4, 2012
County and State Comparisons
17
Mathematics - Grade 4Percentage of Students Earning 3 or 4
0
0.225
0.450
0.675
0.900
DistrictCounty
State
Half Hollow Hills 2011 District Performance Report – June 4, 2012
County and State Comparisons
18
Mathematics - Grade 5Percentage of Students Earning 3 or 4
0
0.225
0.450
0.675
0.900
DistrictCounty
State
Half Hollow Hills 2011 District Performance Report – June 4, 2012
Math Grades 3-5 Performance Levels
19
0
50
100
150
200
Chestnut Hill Forest Park Otsego Paumanok Signal Hill Sunquam Vanderbilt
178191
176185 180 179 181
131 130 131 131 131 131 131
School Performance AMO
NYS EffecJve Annual Measurable ObjecJve (AMO) is the lowest PI that the group can achieve and sJll achieve Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP).
Half Hollow Hills 2011 District Performance Report – June 4, 2012
Math Grades 3-8 Performance Index
20
NYS EffecJve Annual Measurable ObjecJve (AMO) is the lowest PI that the group can achieve and sJll achieve Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP).
0
50
100
150
200
District Performance Index AMO
All Students
Disable
d
Black
Hispanic
Asian / Pacific
Islander
White
LEP
Econom
ically
Disadvantaged
Half Hollow Hills 2011 District Performance Report – June 4, 2012
County and State Comparisons
21
Mathematics - Grade 6Percentage of Students Earning 3 or 4
0
0.225
0.450
0.675
0.900
DistrictCounty
State
Half Hollow Hills 2011 District Performance Report – June 4, 2012
County and State Comparisons
22
Mathematics - Grade 7Percentage of Students Earning 3 or 4
0
0.225
0.450
0.675
0.900
DistrictCounty
State
Half Hollow Hills 2011 District Performance Report – June 4, 2012
County and State Comparisons
23
Mathematics - Grade 8Percentage of Students Earning 3 or 4
0
0.225
0.450
0.675
0.900
DistrictCounty
State
Half Hollow Hills 2011 District Performance Report – June 4, 2012
Math Grades 6-8 Performance Levels
24
NYS EffecJve Annual Measurable ObjecJve (AMO) is the lowest PI that the group can achieve and sJll achieve Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP).
50
80
110
140
170
200
Candlewood West Hollow
184 188
134 134
School Performance AMO
Half Hollow Hills 2011 District Performance Report – June 4, 2012
Science
25
Half Hollow Hills 2011 District Performance Report – June 4, 2012
County and State Comparisons
26
Science - Grade 4Percentage of Students Earning 3 or 4
0%
25.00%
50.00%
75.00%
100.00%
DistrictCounty
State
Half Hollow Hills 2011 District Performance Report – June 4, 2012
County and State Comparisons
27
Science - Grade 8Percentage of Students Earning 3 or 4
0%
25.00%
50.00%
75.00%
100.00%
DistrictCounty
State
Half Hollow Hills 2011 District Performance Report – June 4, 2012
Science 4 & 8 Performance Index
28
NYS EffecJve Annual Measurable ObjecJve (AMO) is the lowest PI that the group can achieve and sJll achieve Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP).
0
50
100
150
200
District Performance Index AMO
All Students
Disable
d
Black
Hispanic
Asian / Pacific
Islander
White
Econom
ically
Disadvantaged
Half Hollow Hills 2011 District Performance Report – June 4, 2012
Science Grade 4 Performance Levels
29
0
50
100
150
200
Chestnut Hill Forest Park Otsego Paumanok Signal Hill Sunquam Vanderbilt
194 199 197 198 197 197 196
100 100 100 100 100 100 100
School Performance AMO
NYS EffecJve Annual Measurable ObjecJve (AMO) is the lowest PI that the group can achieve and sJll achieve Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP).
Half Hollow Hills 2011 District Performance Report – June 4, 2012
Science Grade 8 Performance Levels
30
NYS EffecJve Annual Measurable ObjecJve (AMO) is the lowest PI that the group can achieve and sJll achieve Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP).
50
80
110
140
170
200
Candlewood West Hollow
193 195
100 100
School Performance AMO
Half Hollow Hills 2011 District Performance Report – June 4, 2012
New York State Regents Exams
31
Half Hollow Hills 2011 District Performance Report – June 4, 2012
New York State Regents Exams
32
Comprehensive English 2010-2011
0%
25.00%
50.00%
75.00%
100.00%
Passed at 55%Passed at 65%
Passed w/ Distinction
District State
Half Hollow Hills 2011 District Performance Report – June 4, 2012
New York State Regents Exams
32
Comprehensive English 2010-2011
0%
25.00%
50.00%
75.00%
100.00%
Passed at 55%Passed at 65%
Passed w/ Distinction
District State
Half Hollow Hills 2011 District Performance Report – June 4, 2012
New York State Regents Exams
32
Comprehensive English 2010-2011
0%
25.00%
50.00%
75.00%
100.00%
Passed at 55%Passed at 65%
Passed w/ Distinction
District State
Outperform state by 30 points
Half Hollow Hills 2011 District Performance Report – June 4, 2012
Secondary English Performance Index
33
NYS EffecJve Annual Measurable ObjecJve (AMO) is the lowest PI that the group can achieve and sJll achieve Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP).
160
170
180
190
200
District Performance Index AMO
All Students
Disable
d
Black
Hispanic
Asian / Pacific
Islander
White
Econom
ically
Disadvantaged
Half Hollow Hills 2011 District Performance Report – June 4, 2012
New York State Regents Exams
34
Physical Setting: Earth Science 2010-2011
0%
25.00%
50.00%
75.00%
100.00%
Passed at 55%Passed at 65%
Passed w/ Distinction
District State
Half Hollow Hills 2011 District Performance Report – June 4, 2012
New York State Regents Exams
34
Physical Setting: Earth Science 2010-2011
0%
25.00%
50.00%
75.00%
100.00%
Passed at 55%Passed at 65%
Passed w/ Distinction
District State
Half Hollow Hills 2011 District Performance Report – June 4, 2012
New York State Regents Exams
34
Physical Setting: Earth Science 2010-2011
0%
25.00%
50.00%
75.00%
100.00%
Passed at 55%Passed at 65%
Passed w/ Distinction
District State
Outperform state by 31 points
Half Hollow Hills 2011 District Performance Report – June 4, 2012
New York State Regents Exams
35
Integrated Algebra 2010-2011
0%
25.00%
50.00%
75.00%
100.00%
Passed at 55%Passed at 65%
Passed w/ Distinction
District State
Half Hollow Hills 2011 District Performance Report – June 4, 2012
New York State Regents Exams
35
Integrated Algebra 2010-2011
0%
25.00%
50.00%
75.00%
100.00%
Passed at 55%Passed at 65%
Passed w/ Distinction
District State
Half Hollow Hills 2011 District Performance Report – June 4, 2012
New York State Regents Exams
35
Integrated Algebra 2010-2011
0%
25.00%
50.00%
75.00%
100.00%
Passed at 55%Passed at 65%
Passed w/ Distinction
District State
Outperform state by 41 points
Half Hollow Hills 2011 District Performance Report – June 4, 2012
New York State Regents Exams
36
Global History & Geography 2010-2011
0%
25.00%
50.00%
75.00%
100.00%
Passed at 55%Passed at 65%
Passed w/ Distinction
District State
Half Hollow Hills 2011 District Performance Report – June 4, 2012
New York State Regents Exams
36
Global History & Geography 2010-2011
0%
25.00%
50.00%
75.00%
100.00%
Passed at 55%Passed at 65%
Passed w/ Distinction
District State
Half Hollow Hills 2011 District Performance Report – June 4, 2012
New York State Regents Exams
36
Global History & Geography 2010-2011
0%
25.00%
50.00%
75.00%
100.00%
Passed at 55%Passed at 65%
Passed w/ Distinction
District State
Outperform state by 37 points
Half Hollow Hills 2011 District Performance Report – June 4, 2012
Advanced Placement Exams
37
Half Hollow Hills 2011 District Performance Report – June 4, 2012
Advanced Placement Exams• Nearly 2100 exams written in 2010-2011
37
Half Hollow Hills 2011 District Performance Report – June 4, 2012
Advanced Placement Exams• Nearly 2100 exams written in 2010-2011
• 84% of all students achieved scores of 3, 4 or 5
37
Half Hollow Hills 2011 District Performance Report – June 4, 2012
Advanced Placement Exams• Nearly 2100 exams written in 2010-2011
• 84% of all students achieved scores of 3, 4 or 5 § National average is 57%
37
Half Hollow Hills 2011 District Performance Report – June 4, 2012
Advanced Placement Exams• Nearly 2100 exams written in 2010-2011
• 84% of all students achieved scores of 3, 4 or 5 § National average is 57%
• Nearly 30% of all students achieved a score of 5
37
Half Hollow Hills 2011 District Performance Report – June 4, 2012
Advanced Placement Exams• Nearly 2100 exams written in 2010-2011
• 84% of all students achieved scores of 3, 4 or 5 § National average is 57%
• Nearly 30% of all students achieved a score of 5 § National average is 14%
37
Half Hollow Hills 2011 District Performance Report – June 4, 2012
Graduation Rate Accountability
38
Half Hollow Hills 2011 District Performance Report – June 4, 2012
Graduation Rate Accountability
39
NYS EffecJve Annual Measurable ObjecJve (AMO) is the lowest PI that the group can achieve and sJll achieve Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP).
All Students
Disable
d
Black
Asian / Pacific
Islander
White
Econom
ically
Disadvantaged
0
25
50
75
100
Graduation Rate AMO
Half Hollow Hills 2011 District Performance Report – June 4, 2012
Graduation Rate Accountability
39
NYS EffecJve Annual Measurable ObjecJve (AMO) is the lowest PI that the group can achieve and sJll achieve Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP).
All Students
Disable
d
Black
Asian / Pacific
Islander
White
Econom
ically
Disadvantaged
0
25
50
75
100
Graduation Rate AMO
Half Hollow Hills 2011 District Performance Report – June 4, 2012
Graduation Rate Accountability
39
NYS EffecJve Annual Measurable ObjecJve (AMO) is the lowest PI that the group can achieve and sJll achieve Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP).
All Students
Disable
d
Black
Asian / Pacific
Islander
White
Econom
ically
Disadvantaged
0
25
50
75
100
Graduation Rate AMO
IEP Diplomas & 5-Year grads are not considered graduates
Half Hollow Hills 2011 District Performance Report – June 4, 2012
Graduation Rate Accountability
40
81%
15%
2%1%1%
4 Year College 2 Year College EmploymentMilitary Other
96% of all graduates attending college
Half Hollow Hills 2011 District Performance Report – June 4, 2012
Graduation Rate Accountability
40
81%
15%
2%1%1%
4 Year College 2 Year College EmploymentMilitary Other
96% of all graduates attending college
Half Hollow Hills 2011 District Performance Report – June 4, 2012
Half Hollow Hills 2010-2011 Performance Report
THANK YOU!
41
Half Hollow Hills 2011 District Performance Report – June 4, 2012
County and State Comparisons
43
Elementary English - Language ArtsPercentage of Students Earning 3 or 4
0
20
40
60
80
73 75 75
64 64 3956 57 54Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5
District County State
Half Hollow Hills 2011 District Performance Report – June 4, 2012
County and State Comparisons
44
Secondary English - Language ArtsPercentage of Students Earning 3 or 4
0
20
40
60
8080
6973
66 57 5856 48 47Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8
District County State
Half Hollow Hills 2011 District Performance Report – June 4, 2012
County and State Comparisons
45
Elementary MathematicsPercentage of Students Earning 3 or 4
0
23
45
68
90
82 84 83
66 73 7360 67 65Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5
District County State
Half Hollow Hills 2011 District Performance Report – June 4, 2012
County and State Comparisons
46
Secondary MathematicsPercentage of Students Earning 3 or 4
0
23
45
68
90
86 89 88
72 75 6063 64 70Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8
District County State