performance measurement and evaluation basics 2014 americorps external reviewer training

37
Performance Measurement and Evaluation Basics 2014 AmeriCorps External Reviewer Training

Upload: monica-norton

Post on 26-Dec-2015

216 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Performance Measurement and Evaluation Basics

2014 AmeriCorps External Reviewer Training

¨ Theory of Change¨ Logic Models¨ Performance Measurement and

Evaluation Basics

2

Topics

3

Theory of Change

Theory of Change Elements

Community Problem/Need

Specific Intervention

IntendedOutcome

¨ Cause and effect relationship between intervention and outcome

¨ If…then… logic

4

Theory of ChangeTheory of Change

5

Theory of Change Elements

Community Problem/Need

Specific Intervention

IntendedOutcome

Evidence• Guides choice of intervention

• Supports cause-effect relationship

Statistics documenting

the need

Theory of Change

¨ A likelihood that the proposed intervention (design/dosage) will lead to the outcome

¨ The stronger the evidence, the stronger the relationship between intervention and outcome

Evidence Demonstrates…Theory of Change

6

Community Problem/Need

7

Statistics on the number of students at below grade level in program’s service area; Research on why reading proficiency by 3rd grade is important.

Children reading below grade level

in 3rd grade

Example:Riverton Literacy Corps

Theory of Change

Community Problem/Need

Statistics on the number of students at below grade level in program’s service area; Research on why reading proficiency by 3rd grade is important.

Children reading below grade level

in 3rd grade

8

Students are able to read at 3rd grade level (as measured by 3rd grade reading exam)

Example:Riverton Literacy Corps

IntendedOutcome

Theory of Change

Community Problem/Need

Statistics on the number of students at below grade level in program’s service area; Research on why reading proficiency by 3rd grade is important.

Children reading below grade level

in 3rd grade

Students are able to read at 3rd grade level (as measured by 3rd grade reading exam)

IntendedOutcome

9

Specific Intervention

Evidence: Research on building block skills leading to

reading proficiency. Research on design, frequency,

duration of tutoring sessions.

Individualized tutoring 3 times/week for 20 min on five “building block” literacy skills through reading, writing and verbal communication activities

Example:Riverton Literacy Corps

Theory of Change

¨ A visual summary or snapshot of your program that communicates how your program works, the resources you have to operate your program, the activities you plan, and the outcomes you hope to achieve

¨ A well-specified conceptual framework that identifies key components of the proposed process, product, strategy, or practice and describes the relationships among the key components and outcomes, theoretically and operationally (NOFO p. 18)

¨ The purpose of a logic model is to describe how a program will create change (theory of change)

Logic Models

Logic Models

10

How a Logic Model Works

11

Resources/Inputs Activities Outputs Outcomes/

ImpactsLong-Term

Goal

Certain resources are

needed to operate your

program

If you have access to

them, then you can use

them to accomplish

your planned activities

If you accomplish

your planned activities,

then you will hopefully

deliver the amount of

product and/or service that

you intended

If you accomplish

your planned activities to the extent

you intended, then your

participants will benefit in certain ways

If these benefits to participants

are achieved, then certain changes in

organizations, communities,

or systems might be

expected to occur

Figure 1: How to Read a Logic Model

j k l m nYour Planned Work Your Intended Results

Logic Models

¨ Applicants required to use the logic model template developed by CNCS

¨ Criteria for assessing completeness and quality of logic model will be addressed in the next training module

12

AmeriCorps Logic ModelLogic Models

Project Resources

Core Project Components

Evidence of Project

Implementation and Participation

INPUTS ACTIVITIES OUTPUTSShort-Term Medium-Term Long-Term

What we invest (# and type of AmeriCorps members)

What we do Direct products from program

activities

Changes in knowledge,

skills, attitudes, opinions

Changes in behavior or

action that result from

participants' new knowledge

Meaningful changes, often

in their condition or status in life

Evidence of Change

Outcomes

13

CNCS TemplateLogic Models

¨ Inputs – Resources, including AmeriCorps members

¨ Activities (Interventions) – Services provided by members and/or volunteers

¨ Outputs – Units of service delivered (# of beneficiaries served, etc.)

¨ Outcomes Short Term (Knowledge, Skills, Attitudes,

Opinions) Medium Term (Behavior) Long-Term (Condition)

Applicant Logic ModelsLogic Models

14

Performance Measurement & Evaluation

What is Performance Measurement?¨ Performance measurement is the ongoing and

systematic monitoring and reporting of program accomplishments, particularly progress towards pre-established targets

¨ Monitors the vital signs of a program

15

Evaluation is the use of social science research methods to assess program design, implementation, and effectiveness.

What is Evaluation?Performance Measurement & Evaluation

16

17

Comparing Performance Measurement & Evaluation¨ Performance measurement data can show that a

change occurred but not why¨ Evaluation results can show whether the change

that occurred can be attributed to the intervention

¨ The more scientifically rigorous the evaluation design, the greater the certainty re: causality

Performance Measurement & Evaluation

Performance Measurement EvaluationWhat is it? A system of tracking progress in

accomplishing specific pre-set targets (activities, outputs, and/or outcomes)

A formal scientific process for collecting, analyzing, and interpreting data about how well a program was implemented (process evaluation) or how effectively the program accomplished desired outcomes/impacts (outcome/impact evaluation)

Why is it typically used? To gauge program delivery, quality, participant satisfaction and engagement; to improve products, services, and efficiency; to inform/enhance decision making, and support planning and program development

To assess program effectiveness and determine whether the program is responsible for changes found

How does it work? Monitors a few vital signs related to program performance objectives, outputs, and/or outcomes

Comprehensively examines programs using systematic, objective, and unbiased procedures in accordance with social science research methods and research designs

Who typically does it? Program staff An experienced researcher (often external to the program) who has formal training in evaluation

When is it done? Ongoing Basis Periodically

Comparing Performance Measurement & Evaluation

Performance Measurement & Evaluation

18

Performance Measurement

19

Outputs¨ Amount of service provided

(people served, products created, or programs developed)

Performance Measurement & Evaluation

Performance Measurement

20

Outcomes¨ Reflect the changes or benefits that occur ¨ Can reflect changes in individuals, organizations,

communities, or the environment¨ Address changes in attitudes/beliefs,

knowledge/skills, behavior, or conditions

Performance Measurement & Evaluation

Attitude/Belief Knowledge/Skill Behavior Condition

Thought, feeling Understanding, know-how Action Situation,

circumstance

21

Types of OutcomesPerformance Measurement & Evaluation

22

Different Theories of ChangeHave Different Outcomes

Attitude/Belief Knowledge/Skill Behavior Condition

Increased interest in school Improved math ability Increased school

attendance

Successful completion of high school

Performance Measurement & Evaluation

NEED: 35% of young veterans (18-24 year olds) are unemployed (Department of Veteran Affairs, 2011). Economists cite a lack of marketable civilian skills and the need for education degrees, vocational certifications…

INTERVENTION: National service participants support veterans in completing training programs by assisting in locating appropriate programs, securing financial aid, and by providing tutoring resources and internship placements.

1. Veterans report increased confidence about finding employment. (attitude)

2. Veterans demonstrate new technical skills. (knowledge/skills)

3. Veterans are placed in jobs. (condition)

Which Type of Outcome?

Practice: Choosing an OutcomePerformance Measurement & Evaluation

23

If AmeriCorps members support veterans to enroll in and complete training programs, then veterans will gain technical skills

If veterans gain technical skills, then they will be more likely to find jobs

24

Following the LogicPerformance Measurement & Evaluation

Evaluation and Theory of Change

¨ Theory of change (as expressed in a logic model) is key to evaluation

¨ Based on a program’s theory of change, evaluation tests assumptions/hypotheses about how a program works and whether or not it is achieving what it intended to accomplish

Performance Measurement & Evaluation

25

Two levels/Types of Evaluation:

1. Implementation (Process) Is the program operating as intended?

2. Outcomes (Short-, Intermediate, and Long-Term) What difference did the program make?

Levels/Types of EvaluationPerformance Measurement & Evaluation

26

¨ Is the program operating as designed, and, if not, how and why? Do program staff clearly understand the program’s goals and

objectives? Do staff need additional training to implement the program

correctly? How consistent is the program’s implementation across sites?

¨ Is the program reaching the intended target population? Who are the individuals receiving/participating in the program? Is the target population receiving the appropriate services? Why

or why not?¨ What is the quality of services provided by the program?

How satisfied are participants with their program experiences? Do staff believe that the program is effective? Why or why not? Which program elements are or are not working well? Why?

Implementation Evaluation: Types of Questions

Performance Measurement & Evaluation

27

Outcomes/Impact Evaluation: Types of Questions

¨ What did the program accomplish?¨ What impact did the program have on its

participants?¨ Was the benefit greater with this program as

compared with another program?¨ Did all types of students or clients benefit from

the program or specific subgroups?¨ Did the program increase participants’

awareness, knowledge and skills?

Performance Measurement & Evaluation

28

Internal Validity

¨ The degree to which measured effects may be due to program vs. factors other than the program

¨ High internal validity allows for more plausible causal attribution statements

¨ Attaining moderate and strong evidence requires that a study has high internal validity

Performance Measurement & Evaluation

29

 Evaluation Study Designs

Comparison

Ability to make statements

about causal attribution

Experimental Design Studies Randomly Assigned Groups

Quasi-Experimental Design Studies

Statistically Matched Groups

Non-Experimental Design Studies

Not Statistically Matched Groups or Group Compared to

Itself

Evaluation Study Designs & Causal Impact

Performance Measurement & Evaluation

30

Children receiving nutrition, fitness and counseling services through an after school program delivered by AmeriCorps members are compared to children attending an after school program that does not include the AmeriCorps nutrition, fitness and counseling program. Children in the two groups are matched based on demographic characteristics and baseline measures of nutrition, fitness and obesity.

What kind of evaluation design is it?

Practice Questions

Practice Question I

31

This is a quasi-experimental design because it compares beneficiaries to a statistically matched group of individuals not receiving the AmeriCorps intervention.

32

AnswerPractice Questions

High school students enrolled in a career preparation program delivered by AmeriCorps members are compared to high school students who wanted to the program but were not selected. 100 students wanted to join the program, but there were only 50 spots. 50 students were randomly selected for the program. The other 50 were placed on a waiting list to join the program.

What kind of evaluation design is it?

33

Practice Question 2Practice Questions

This is an experimental design because individuals were assigned to the beneficiary group or the control group through random assignment.

34

AnswerPractice Questions

Students receiving academic mentoring services from AmeriCorps members take a survey that asks their view about the importance of education before participating in the AmeriCorps mentoring program and after participation in the program.

What kind of evaluation design is it?

35

Practice Question 3Practice Questions

This is a non-experimental design because it looks at changes in the beneficiaries’ attitudes over time. There is no comparison group or control group.

36

AnswerPractice Questions

To check for understanding and verify that you have completed this orientation session, please complete the Assessment at the following link:

https://www.surveymonkey.com/s/perfmeasure

37

Next StepsPractice Questions