performance evaluation of sipm arrays under strong magnetic fields s españa 1, g tapias 2, l m...
Post on 20-Dec-2015
220 views
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Performance Evaluation of SiPM Arrays under Strong Magnetic Fields S España 1, G Tapias 2, L M Fraile 1, J L Herraiz 1, E Vicente 1,3, J M Udias 1, M Desco](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062313/56649d4e5503460f94a2e5f6/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Performance Evaluation of SiPM Performance Evaluation of SiPM Arrays under Strong Magnetic Arrays under Strong Magnetic
FieldsFieldsS España1, G Tapias2, L M Fraile1, J L Herraiz1, E Vicente1,3,
J M Udias1, M Desco2, J J Vaquero2
1Grupo de Física Nuclear, Dpto. Física Atómica, Molecular y Nuclear, Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain 2Unidad de Medicina y Cirugía Experimental, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain 3Instituto de Estructura de la Materia, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC), Madrid, Spain
![Page 2: Performance Evaluation of SiPM Arrays under Strong Magnetic Fields S España 1, G Tapias 2, L M Fraile 1, J L Herraiz 1, E Vicente 1,3, J M Udias 1, M Desco](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062313/56649d4e5503460f94a2e5f6/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
2
IntroductionIntroduction
SiPM (G-APD, MPPC, …) have many advantages compared to APD and PMT:
•High gain•Low Voltage•Fast Timing•Compact size•Low cost•Compatible with magnetic fields
![Page 3: Performance Evaluation of SiPM Arrays under Strong Magnetic Fields S España 1, G Tapias 2, L M Fraile 1, J L Herraiz 1, E Vicente 1,3, J M Udias 1, M Desco](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062313/56649d4e5503460f94a2e5f6/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
3
Calorimeter Tests of SiPMsCalorimeter Tests of SiPMs
CALICE-HCAL (ILC): CAlorimeter for the Linear Collider Experiment
CALICE-HCAL (ILC): CAlorimeter for the Linear Collider Experiment
![Page 4: Performance Evaluation of SiPM Arrays under Strong Magnetic Fields S España 1, G Tapias 2, L M Fraile 1, J L Herraiz 1, E Vicente 1,3, J M Udias 1, M Desco](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062313/56649d4e5503460f94a2e5f6/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
4
GoalsGoals
• Previous results: Previous results:
SiPMs (1 × 1 mmSiPMs (1 × 1 mm22))
• New results:New results:
2 x 2 SiPM array (6 × 6 mm2 x 2 SiPM array (6 × 6 mm22))
Strong Magnetic Field (7 Tesla)Strong Magnetic Field (7 Tesla)
1 mm1 mm
![Page 5: Performance Evaluation of SiPM Arrays under Strong Magnetic Fields S España 1, G Tapias 2, L M Fraile 1, J L Herraiz 1, E Vicente 1,3, J M Udias 1, M Desco](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062313/56649d4e5503460f94a2e5f6/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
5
MaterialsMaterials
VendorVendorActive Active
area (mmarea (mm22))Number of Number of
PixelsPixelsPixel Pixel
size (size (μμm)m)PDE PDE (%)(%)
Hamamatsu
(2 × 2 array)6 × 6
3600/
element50 5050
Single crystalSingle crystalCrystal matrixCrystal matrix
4 × 44 × 4
10 10 × 10 × 20 mmmm33 LYSO LYSO 1.5 x 1.5 x 12 mm1.5 x 1.5 x 12 mm33 LYSO LYSO
![Page 6: Performance Evaluation of SiPM Arrays under Strong Magnetic Fields S España 1, G Tapias 2, L M Fraile 1, J L Herraiz 1, E Vicente 1,3, J M Udias 1, M Desco](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062313/56649d4e5503460f94a2e5f6/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
6
Bruker BioSpec 70/20 USR7 Tesla
LIM – Hospital Gregorio Marañón
MaterialsMaterials
![Page 7: Performance Evaluation of SiPM Arrays under Strong Magnetic Fields S España 1, G Tapias 2, L M Fraile 1, J L Herraiz 1, E Vicente 1,3, J M Udias 1, M Desco](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062313/56649d4e5503460f94a2e5f6/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
7
Experimental SetupExperimental Setup1.- Single crystal1.- Single crystal
LYSO crystal (10 × 10 × 20 mm3) LYSO crystal (10 × 10 × 20 mm3)
22Na22NaSiPM covers 36% SiPM covers 36%
of scintillator baseof scintillator baseSiPM covers 36% SiPM covers 36%
of scintillator baseof scintillator base
![Page 8: Performance Evaluation of SiPM Arrays under Strong Magnetic Fields S España 1, G Tapias 2, L M Fraile 1, J L Herraiz 1, E Vicente 1,3, J M Udias 1, M Desco](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062313/56649d4e5503460f94a2e5f6/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
8
Pulse ShapePulse Shape
NO preamplifierNO preamplifierNO preamplifierNO preamplifier
![Page 9: Performance Evaluation of SiPM Arrays under Strong Magnetic Fields S España 1, G Tapias 2, L M Fraile 1, J L Herraiz 1, E Vicente 1,3, J M Udias 1, M Desco](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062313/56649d4e5503460f94a2e5f6/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
9
Gain vs VoltageGain vs Voltage
T=20ºC
![Page 10: Performance Evaluation of SiPM Arrays under Strong Magnetic Fields S España 1, G Tapias 2, L M Fraile 1, J L Herraiz 1, E Vicente 1,3, J M Udias 1, M Desco](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062313/56649d4e5503460f94a2e5f6/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
10
Gain vs TemperatureGain vs Temperature
Bias = 69.0 V
![Page 11: Performance Evaluation of SiPM Arrays under Strong Magnetic Fields S España 1, G Tapias 2, L M Fraile 1, J L Herraiz 1, E Vicente 1,3, J M Udias 1, M Desco](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062313/56649d4e5503460f94a2e5f6/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
11
Dynamic RangeDynamic Range
![Page 12: Performance Evaluation of SiPM Arrays under Strong Magnetic Fields S España 1, G Tapias 2, L M Fraile 1, J L Herraiz 1, E Vicente 1,3, J M Udias 1, M Desco](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062313/56649d4e5503460f94a2e5f6/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
12
Energy spectra Energy spectra 2222NaNa
ΔE@511 keV = 14%ΔE@511 keV = 14%
Bias = 69.0 VT = 20ºC
![Page 13: Performance Evaluation of SiPM Arrays under Strong Magnetic Fields S España 1, G Tapias 2, L M Fraile 1, J L Herraiz 1, E Vicente 1,3, J M Udias 1, M Desco](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062313/56649d4e5503460f94a2e5f6/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
13
Experimental SetupExperimental Setup2.- Crystal matrix2.- Crystal matrix
4 × 4 LYSO matrix (1.5 × 1.5 × 12 mm3) 4 × 4 LYSO matrix (1.5 × 1.5 × 12 mm3)
18F18F
![Page 14: Performance Evaluation of SiPM Arrays under Strong Magnetic Fields S España 1, G Tapias 2, L M Fraile 1, J L Herraiz 1, E Vicente 1,3, J M Udias 1, M Desco](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062313/56649d4e5503460f94a2e5f6/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
14
Flood Field ImageFlood Field Image
•18F• 68.2 V - 20ºC• 5·105 counts• SoftwareAnger logic
![Page 15: Performance Evaluation of SiPM Arrays under Strong Magnetic Fields S España 1, G Tapias 2, L M Fraile 1, J L Herraiz 1, E Vicente 1,3, J M Udias 1, M Desco](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062313/56649d4e5503460f94a2e5f6/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
15
Flood Field ImageFlood Field Image
•18F• 68.2 V - 20ºC• 5·105 counts• SoftwareAnger logic Peak to valley ratio = 10:1
![Page 16: Performance Evaluation of SiPM Arrays under Strong Magnetic Fields S España 1, G Tapias 2, L M Fraile 1, J L Herraiz 1, E Vicente 1,3, J M Udias 1, M Desco](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062313/56649d4e5503460f94a2e5f6/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
16
Crystal Energy SpectrumCrystal Energy Spectrum
•18F• 68.2 V - 20ºC• 3·104 counts/crystal
![Page 17: Performance Evaluation of SiPM Arrays under Strong Magnetic Fields S España 1, G Tapias 2, L M Fraile 1, J L Herraiz 1, E Vicente 1,3, J M Udias 1, M Desco](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062313/56649d4e5503460f94a2e5f6/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
17
Energy Resolution @ 511keVEnergy Resolution @ 511keV
FWHM (%) 0 Tesla 7 Tesla
Center 11.2 11.9
Center Edge row 14.1 14.4
Corner 21.7 21.4
![Page 18: Performance Evaluation of SiPM Arrays under Strong Magnetic Fields S España 1, G Tapias 2, L M Fraile 1, J L Herraiz 1, E Vicente 1,3, J M Udias 1, M Desco](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062313/56649d4e5503460f94a2e5f6/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
18
ConclusionsConclusions
• The 2 × 2 SiPM array from Hamamatsu shows very good suitability for its use in the presence of strong magnetic fields.
• Monitoring of Temperature and Voltage is needed to correct gain variations.
• Combination with LYSO crystals shows potential to obtain energy resolution below 10% @ 511 keV.
• The 4 × 4 crystal array of 1.5 mm pitch size was perfectly resolved with negligible differences at 0 and 7 Tesla.
![Page 19: Performance Evaluation of SiPM Arrays under Strong Magnetic Fields S España 1, G Tapias 2, L M Fraile 1, J L Herraiz 1, E Vicente 1,3, J M Udias 1, M Desco](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062313/56649d4e5503460f94a2e5f6/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
19
Future SiPMsFuture SiPMs
1 × 4 channels array1 × 4 channels array1 × 4 mm1 × 4 mm22
1 × 1 mm1 × 1 mm22 / channel / channel 25/50/100 μm
4 × 4 channels array4 × 4 channels array16 × 16 mm16 × 16 mm22
3 × 3 mm3 × 3 mm22 / channel / channel25/50/100 μm