performance evaluation of a zerovalent iron reactive barrier:  mineralogical characteristics

Download Performance Evaluation of a Zerovalent Iron Reactive Barrier:  Mineralogical Characteristics

Post on 08-Dec-2016




1 download

Embed Size (px)


  • Performance Evaluation of aZerovalent Iron Reactive Barrier:Mineralogical CharacteristicsD . H . P H I L L I P S , * B . G U , D . B . W A T S O N ,Y . R O H , L . L I A N G , A N D S . Y . L E E

    Environmental Sciences Division, Oak Ridge NationalLaboratory, P.O. Box 2008, Building 1505,Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831

    There is a limited amount of information about the effectsof mineral precipitates and corrosion on the lifespanand long-term performance of in situ Fe0 reactive barriers.The objectives of this paper are (1) to investigate mineralprecipitates through an in situ permeable Fe0 reactivebarrier and (2) to examine the cementation and corrosionof Fe0 filings in order to estimate the lifespan of thisbarrier. This field scale barrier (225 long 2 wide 31deep) has been installed in order to remove uraniumfrom contaminated groundwater at the Y-12 plant site,Oak Ridge, TN. According to XRD and SEM-EDX analysisof core samples recovered from the Fe0 portion of the barrier,iron oxyhydroxides were found throughout, while aragonite,siderite, and FeS occurred predominantly in the shallowportion. Additionally, aragonite and FeS were present in up-gradient deeper zone where groundwater first enters theFe0 section of the barrier. After 15 months in the barrier, mostof the Fe0 filings in the core samples were loose, and alittle corrosion of Fe0 filings was observed in most of thebarrier. However, larger amounts of corrosion (10-150 mthick corrosion rinds) occurred on cemented iron particleswhere groundwater first enters the barrier. Bicarbonate/carbonate concentrations were high in this section of thebarrier. Byproducts of this corrosion, iron oxyhydroxides,were the primary binding material in the cementation. Also,aragonite acted as a binding material to a lesser extent,while amorphous FeS occurred as coatings and infilings.Thin corrosion rinds (2-50 m thick) were also found on theuncemented individual Fe0 filings in the same area ofthe cementation. If corrosion continues, the estimatedlifespan of Fe0 filings in the more corroded sections is 5to 10 years, while the Fe0 filings in the rest of the barrierperhaps would last longer than 15 years. The mineralprecipitates on the Fe0 filing surfaces may hinder thiscorrosion but they may also decrease reactive surfaces.This research shows that precipitation will vary across asingle reactive barrier and that greater corrosion andsubsequent cementation of the filings may occur wheregroundwater first enters the Fe0 section of the barrier.

    IntroductionRecently, Fe0 permeable reactive barrier technology hasreceived much interest as an alternative to pump and treat

    systems because Fe0 is a readily available medium that iscost saving over a long term and has shown encouragingresults in remediating contaminants from groundwater (1-20, 24, 26, 27, 30-32). Most of the Fe0 systems are used tomediate volatile organic compounds by reductive dehalo-genation (1, 2), and only a few are used to remove heavymetals (3, 4) and radionuclides (5-8). Over 12 of each full-and pilot-scale in situ Fe0 permeable reactive barriers havebeen installed in North America (9). However, only a fewstudies (6, 10-12) have addressed issues related to the long-term performance of Fe0 as a reactive barrier material.Currently, there is still much uncertainty in predicting long-term effectiveness of the reactive media and the hydraulicperformance of these permeable barriers at long-run time(10).

    Geochemical conditions within in situ Fe0 permeablereactive barriers are responsible for the corrosion of Fe0 filings(2) and the formation of precipitates (10). Mineral precipitatesin Fe0 reactive barriers may decrease surface reactivity, thusinfluencing the effectiveness and lifespan of the barrier (6,10-12). Because the geochemistry of the groundwater variesat different barrier sites, the types and extent of mineralprecipitation vary broadly at different barriers. For example,green rust, [Fe42+Fe32+(OH)12][SO42-2H2O], was observed inthe Fe0 barrier at the Elizabeth City, NC and Lowry Air ForceBase, CO site (installed in 1995) where SO42- was partiallyreduced in the groundwater (13). Calcium and Fe carbonateprecipitated in a gate in the Fe0 medium of the permeablereactive barrier at the Denver Federal Center, Denver, COwhere carbonate was high in the groundwater (14). Con-versely, a reactive barrier in Borden, ON showed no mineralprecipitation after one year of operation, even though lossesof 185 mL/L Ca2+ and 82 mL/L of HCO3- were detected acrossthe barrier (11).

    Depletion of reactive media through corrosion is also aconcern in long-term performance of Fe0 barriers (11). Agentscorrosive to Fe0, such as HCO3- and SO42- (15), commonlyoccur in groundwater (6) and are expected to cause Fe0 filingsto disintegrate in reactive barriers. Measurements of disin-tegration rates of Fe0 filings in their perspective geochemicalenvironments are needed to predict future excavation orrenewal of the barrier material. The accumulation of someprecipitates, either individually or as a mixture, such as ironand calcium carbonate (11, 16), green rust (17), and ironoxyhydroxides (12), may restrict flow and eventually clog thesystem (10, 11).

    Application of Fe0 technology for the remediation ofuranium from groundwater is being investigated at the OakRidge National Laboratory (5, 6). A pilot-scale in situ Fe0

    permeable reactive barrier was installed in late November1997 at the Bear Creek Valley (BCV) Y-12 Plant, Oak Ridge,TN, to intercept uranium contaminated groundwater (18).A long-term monitoring plan of the groundwater and barriermaterial at the site is being carried out. The objectives of thispaper are to report (1) the minerals that have precipitatedalong the barrier and (2) to examine the cementation andcorrosion of Fe0 filings that have occurred over the first 15months of operation in order to estimate the lifespan of thebarrier.

    Materials and MethodsBarrier Installation. In late November of 1997, GeoCon Inc.completed construction of the Fe0 barrier at the Oak RidgeY-12 site (Figure 1a). The barrier dimension is 225 long 2 wide with an Fe0 filled midsection of 31 deep 26 long)between two 99.5 sections of pea gravel. The pea gravel

    * Corresponding author phone: (865)241-3959; fax: (865)576-3989;e-mail:

    Environ. Sci. Technol. 2000, 34, 4169-4176

    10.1021/es001005z Not subject to U.S. Copyright. Publ. 2000 Am. Chem. Soc. VOL. 34, NO. 19, 2000 / ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY 9 4169Published on Web 08/31/2000

  • sections are used to increase groundwater flow through theFe0 treatment media and divert it down-gradient. Guar gumbiopolymer slurry was used to prevent sloughing during soilexcavation (19). The Fe0 filings used in the reactive barrierwere obtained from Peerless Metal Powders and Abrasives,Detroit, MI. These Fe0 filings are 3 to 24 mm long (majorityat g10 mm) and 0.5 to 1.5 mm thick (about -1/2 and 25mesh size). These Fe0 filings were composed of about 86%Fe0, 3-4% carbon, 3% silicon and other elements, and smallamounts of magnetite (Fe3O4) (20). The material around thebarrier is a heterogeneous mixture of fill materials and nativesoil, saprolite, and rock fragments. Native soil and saprolitefrom the Nolichucky Shale formation are present near thebottom of the barrier (18).

    Groundwater Characteristics. The background well(TMW 12) is situated in the up-gradient section of the peagravel in the barrier where much of the untreated ground-water collects before moving down through the Fe0 portionof the barrier (Figure 1a). The groundwater from thebackground well is mainly aerobic with a near neutral pHand generally higher concentrations of HCO3-/CO3-, Ca2+,SO42-, NO3- compared to the groundwater in the barrier(Table 1; Figure 2). Similar Fe2+ and S- values are observedfor the groundwater from TMW 12 and piezometers fromthe Fe0 section of the trench. The background uraniumconcentration of this groundwater in the up-gradient soiland pea gravel portion of the barrier is generally

  • after they were removed from the barrier. Argon was injectedinto the cores through small incisions at each end of theplastic caps. These incisions were immediately sealed withtape after injection. The cores were stored in Ar purged airtightPVC tubes to minimize oxidation. During the period be-tweensampling and preparation (2-3 weeks), the PVC storagetubes were purged with Ar twice a week.

    Because of disturbances, mainly compaction and spillagethat resulted in about 50% retrieval of the cores, generallyonly 2 of core material were actually collected in each 4core tube. Therefore, two cores were collected from eachsampling point in order to retrieve both up- and down-gradient interfaces of the barrier. Together, the cores fromeach of the sampling points usually contained about 0.5 of

    soil and fill material from each interface and about 3 ofbarrier material. During preparation, the barrier materialfrom each coring point was separated into 4 segments (usually5 long). Representative samples (10 g) of each segment,including cemented samples, were immediately rinsed withacetone, brought to dryness, and used for mineralogical andmorphological analysis.

    For X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis, the dried sampleswere sonicated in acetone for 2 h to detach precipitates fromFe0 filings. To avoid destruction of the filter from the acetone,an aliquot of the mineral suspension in acetone was pipettedinto Milli-Q water (acetone:H2O ) 1:1) and vacuum platedonto 0.45 m Millipore filters. Mineralogical characterizationof these mounts was performed with XRD using a Scientag

    TABLE 1. Geochemical Parameters of the Groundwater from the Up-Gradient Background (TMW 12) Well and the MultilevelPiezometers (DP19 and DP 22) within the Fe0 Portion of the Barrier


    location pH Eh, mV HCO3-/CO3- Ca2+ Fe2+ SO42- S- total U NO3-


View more >