pcfi and pcf2 specifically bind to cis elements in the rice

13
The Plant Cell, Vol. 9, 1607-1 619, September 1997 O 1997 American Society of Plant Physiologists PCFI and PCF2 Specifically Bind to cis Elements in the Rice Proliferating Cell Nuclear Antigen Gene Shunichi Kosugi and Yuko Ohashil National lnstitute of Agrobiological Resources, Tsukuba, lbaraki 305, Japan We have previously defined the promoter elements, sites Ila and Ilb, in the rice proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) gene that are essential for meristematic tissue-specific expression. In this study, we isolated and characterized cDNAs encoding proteins that specifically bind to sites Ila and Ilb. The two DNA binding proteins, designated PCFl and PCFP, share >To% homology in common conserved sequences at the N-terminal regions. The conserved regions are respon- sible for DNA binding and homodimer and heterodimer formation, and they contain a putative basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) motif. The structure and DNA binding specificity of the bHLH motif are distinguishable from those of other known bHLH proteins that bind to the E-box. The motif is >70% homologous to several expressed sequence tags from Arabidopsis and rice, suggesting that PCFl and PCF2 are members of a nove1 family of proteins that are conserved in monocotyledons and dicotyledons. A supershift assay using an anti-PCF2 antibody showed the involvement of PCF2 in site Ila (site Ilb) binding activities in rice nuclear extracts, particularly in meristematic tissues. PCFl and PCFS were also more likely to form heterodimers than homodimers. Our results suggest that PCFl and PCFS are involved in meriste- matic tissue-specific expression of the rice PCNA gene through binding to sites Ila and Ilb and formation of homodimers or heterodimers. INTRODUCTION Transitions from the G1-to-S phase of the cell cycle in dividing cells and the Go-to-S phase in quiescent cells are important steps in the process of cell proliferation. Most of our knowl- edge about the control of the G, (Go)-toS phase transition is based on studies with yeast and mammalian cells. These studies have suggested that G, cyclins and their associated kinases are key regulators of the G, (Go)-to-S transition. Re- cent studies have identified the genes for G, cyclins in plants (Dahl et al., 1995; Soni et al., 1995), suggesting that regulation by the G1 cyclins and their associated kinases seems to be commonly involved in the control of the G, (Go)- to-S transition in eukaryotes. In addition, in eukaryotes, when quiescent cells are stimulated to enter into S phase, the ex- pression of several genes involved in DNA synthesis, includ- ing the proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) gene, is induced at the G1-to-S phase boundary-a final step of the G1 (Go)-to-S phase transition. In mammalian cells, the transcription of these genes is regu- lated to a large extent by transcription factors E2F (Ogris et al., 1993; DeGregori et al., 1995; Tommasi and Pfeifer, 1995) and Spl (Karlseder et al., 1996; Lin et al., 1996; Slansky and Farnham, 1996). On the other hand, in budding yeast, the Mlul cell-cycle-box binding protein Dscl has been reported to reg- ulate genes expressed at the G, (Go)-toS phase boundary (Lowndes et al., 1992a, 1992b). In plants, cell cycle progres- To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail yohashi@ ss.abr.affrc.go.jp; fax 81 -298-38-7044. sion, including the G, (Go)-to-S phase transition, remains to be investigated. To date, the transcriptional factors regulat- ing DNA synthesis-related genes have not been identified. In animals, the structures of E2F and Spl and their tran- scriptional regulatory mechanisms are quite different from those of Dscl in yeast. This suggests that the regulatory mechanisms in the G1 (G,)-to-S phase transition in plants may be different also. The PCNA, an auxiliary protein of DNA polymerase 6 (Bravo et al., 1987; Prelich et al., 1987b), participates in a variety of processes, such as DNA replication (Prelich et al., 1987a), DNA repair synthesis (Toschi and Bravo, 1988; Shivji et al., 1992), and cell cycle control through interactions with the CDK (cyclin-dependent kinase)xyclin-CDI (cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor) complex (Waga et al., 1994). The PCNA gene is induced at the G,-to-S phase boundary (Almendral et al., 1987; Matsumoto et al., 1987; Jaskulski et al., 1988) and is well conserved in eukaryotes (Suzuka et al., 1991). In addi- tion, the rice PCNA protein produced in bacteria has been found to stimulate DNA synthesis catalyzed by DNA poly- merase 6 from human cells (Matsumoto et al., 1994), suggest- ing the functional conservation of PCNA among eukaryotes. Among the genes that are expressed in the G, (Go)-to-S phase boundary in plants, the rice PCNA gene is one of the most characterized genes in studies examining transcrip- tional control. The expression of the rice PCNA gene is restricted exclusively to meristematic regions and is con- trolled at the transcriptional phase (Kosugi et al., 1991). The

Upload: nguyenthuy

Post on 07-Jan-2017

230 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

The Plant Cell, Vol. 9, 1607-1 61 9, September 1997 O 1997 American Society of Plant Physiologists

PCFI and PCF2 Specifically Bind to cis Elements in the Rice Proliferating Cell Nuclear Antigen Gene

Shunichi Kosugi and Yuko Ohashil National lnstitute of Agrobiological Resources, Tsukuba, lbaraki 305, Japan

We have previously defined the promoter elements, sites Ila and Ilb, in the rice proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) gene that are essential for meristematic tissue-specific expression. In this study, we isolated and characterized cDNAs encoding proteins that specifically bind to sites Ila and Ilb. The two DNA binding proteins, designated PCFl and PCFP, share >To% homology in common conserved sequences at the N-terminal regions. The conserved regions are respon- sible for DNA binding and homodimer and heterodimer formation, and they contain a putative basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) motif. The structure and DNA binding specificity of the bHLH motif are distinguishable from those of other known bHLH proteins that bind to the E-box. The motif is >70% homologous to several expressed sequence tags from Arabidopsis and rice, suggesting that PCFl and PCF2 are members of a nove1 family of proteins that are conserved in monocotyledons and dicotyledons. A supershift assay using an anti-PCF2 antibody showed the involvement of PCF2 in site Ila (site Ilb) binding activities in rice nuclear extracts, particularly in meristematic tissues. PCFl and PCFS were also more likely to form heterodimers than homodimers. Our results suggest that PCFl and PCFS are involved in meriste- matic tissue-specific expression of the rice PCNA gene through binding to sites Ila and Ilb and formation of homodimers or heterodimers.

INTRODUCTION

Transitions from the G1-to-S phase of the cell cycle in dividing cells and the Go-to-S phase in quiescent cells are important steps in the process of cell proliferation. Most of our knowl- edge about the control of the G, (Go)-toS phase transition is based on studies with yeast and mammalian cells. These studies have suggested that G, cyclins and their associated kinases are key regulators of the G, (Go)-to-S transition. Re- cent studies have identified the genes for G, cyclins in plants (Dahl et al., 1995; Soni et al., 1995), suggesting that regulation by the G1 cyclins and their associated kinases seems to be commonly involved in the control of the G, (Go)- to-S transition in eukaryotes. In addition, in eukaryotes, when quiescent cells are stimulated to enter into S phase, the ex- pression of several genes involved in DNA synthesis, includ- ing the proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) gene, is induced at the G1-to-S phase boundary-a final step of the G1 (Go)-to-S phase transition.

In mammalian cells, the transcription of these genes is regu- lated to a large extent by transcription factors E2F (Ogris et al., 1993; DeGregori et al., 1995; Tommasi and Pfeifer, 1995) and Spl (Karlseder et al., 1996; Lin et al., 1996; Slansky and Farnham, 1996). On the other hand, in budding yeast, the Mlul cell-cycle-box binding protein Dscl has been reported to reg- ulate genes expressed at the G, (Go)-toS phase boundary (Lowndes et al., 1992a, 1992b). In plants, cell cycle progres-

To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail yohashi@ ss.abr.affrc.go.jp; fax 81 -298-38-7044.

sion, including the G, (Go)-to-S phase transition, remains to be investigated. To date, the transcriptional factors regulat- ing DNA synthesis-related genes have not been identified. In animals, the structures of E2F and Spl and their tran- scriptional regulatory mechanisms are quite different from those of Dscl in yeast. This suggests that the regulatory mechanisms in the G1 (G,)-to-S phase transition in plants may be different also.

The PCNA, an auxiliary protein of DNA polymerase 6 (Bravo et al., 1987; Prelich et al., 1987b), participates in a variety of processes, such as DNA replication (Prelich et al., 1987a), DNA repair synthesis (Toschi and Bravo, 1988; Shivji et al., 1992), and cell cycle control through interactions with the CDK (cyclin-dependent kinase)xyclin-CDI (cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor) complex (Waga et al., 1994). The PCNA gene is induced at the G,-to-S phase boundary (Almendral et al., 1987; Matsumoto et al., 1987; Jaskulski et al., 1988) and is well conserved in eukaryotes (Suzuka et al., 1991). In addi- tion, the rice PCNA protein produced in bacteria has been found to stimulate DNA synthesis catalyzed by DNA poly- merase 6 from human cells (Matsumoto et al., 1994), suggest- ing the functional conservation of PCNA among eukaryotes.

Among the genes that are expressed in the G, (Go)-to-S phase boundary in plants, the rice PCNA gene is one of the most characterized genes in studies examining transcrip- tional control. The expression of the rice PCNA gene is restricted exclusively to meristematic regions and is con- trolled at the transcriptional phase (Kosugi et al., 1991). The

1608 The Plant Cell

PCNA protein is also present in proliferating cells but absent from nondividing cells and terminally differentiated plant tis- sues (Daidoji et al., 1992). Loss-of-function analysis of the rice PCNA promoter using transgenic plants has demonstrated that two elements (sites Ila and llb) in the proximal region are essential for the proliferating cell-specific transcriptional ac- tivity (Kosugi et al., 1995). On the other hand, two repeated- site Ila sequences located upstream of the cauliflower mosaic virus 35s minimal promoter confer transcriptional activation in tobacco protoplasts (Kosugi et al., 1995). This suggests that sites Ila and Ilb most probably function as positive cis- acting elements in proliferating cells. In addition, results of electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSAs) have also shown that these sites bind to nuclear proteins with identical or simi- lar DNA binding specificity in rice and tobacco (Kosugi et al., 1995). These data suggest that sites Ila and Ilb have a similar function in diversified species. Thus, it is imperative to under- stand the fine details and role of sites Ila and Ilb and nuclear factors binding to the sites in rice PCNA gene expression.

In this report, we describe the cloning and characteriza- tion of proteins PCFl and PCF2 that specifically bind to sites Ila and Ilb in the promoter region of the rice PCNA gene. These proteins have a deduced basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) motif that is responsible for DNA binding and dimer- ization. We further demonstrate that PCFl and PCF2 are nove1 types of bHLH proteins and distinct from other known bHLH transcriptional factors. We also discuss the impor- tance of these proteins in the regulation of the PCNA gene.

R ESU LTS

Cloning of the PCFl and PCF2 cDNAs

We have previously defined the promoter elements (site Ila and site llb) essential for meristematic tissue-specific ex- pression of the rice PCNA gene (Kosugi et al., 1995). In this study, we isolated cDNAs for specific binding proteins for sites Ila and Ilb. Because the initial attempts to isolate cDNAs by in vitro screening were unsuccessful, we used the yeast one-hybrid system for cloning. This system has been developed for the isolation of sequence-specific DNA bind- ing proteins (Li and Herskowitz, 1993; Wang and Reed, 1993). In this system, a hybrid expression library, which pro- duces fusion proteins with a transcriptional activation do- main such as Gal4p, is introduced into a yeast strain carrying a reporter gene. This leads to the activation of the reporter gene containing the binding site of interest within its promoter region through the binding of hybrid proteins to the binding site.

We originally constructed reporter genes consisting of an iso-1-cytochrome c CYC7 minimal promoter fused to the HIS3 coding region in which 12 copies of the site Ila or site Ilb element were inserted upstream of the CYC7 promoter. The pGAD424 cDNA library produced from rice suspension-

cultured cells was introduced into a yeast strain carrying the reporter gene (site Ila),,-CYC1-HIS3. When -5 X 106 Leu+ yeast clones were plated on SD synthetic leucine- and histidine-free media, -5 X 103 colonies that showed histidine auxotrophy appeared after 4 days. The plasmids in these col- onies were rescreened, and two independent HIS+ clones were isolated. To examine whether the HIS+ phenotype of these clones was dependent on site Ila present in the re- porter gene, we used two other reporter genes, (site llb)12- CYC7-HIS3 and CYC7-HIS3, containing 12 copies of site Ilb and no repeated sequence in their promoter regions, re- spectively. Results presented in Table 1 show that the (site Ilb),,-CYC7-H/S3 reporter gene was activated in these clones but that the CYC7-HIS3 control reporter gene was not. These results indicate that activation of the reporter gene in these HIS+ clones was dependent on the sequences of sites Ila and Ilb that were inserted upstream of the HIS3 reporter genes and suggest that cDNAs in these clones en- code DNA binding proteins specific for sites Ila and Ilb.

We then examined the specificities of DNA binding to PCFl and PCF2 proteins encoded by these cDNA clones. The cDNA inserts were cloned into pMAL-c2 and introduced into Escherichia coli strains. The recombinant fusion pro- teins maltose binding protein (MBP)-PCF1 and MBP-PCF2, containing regions extending from residues 25 to 183 in the PCFl and from residues 1 to 265 in the PCF2 amino acid sequences, respectively, were purified by using an affinity column, and an EMSA was conducted. MBP-PCF1 and MBP-PCF2 bound specifically to sites Ila and Ilb but not to a mutated site Ila sequence (mlla), even when 100 ng of pro- teins was added (Figure l A , lanes 6 and 15). In addition, MBP itself had no ability to bind to these DNA probes (data not shown). These observations indicate that PCFl and PCF2 are DNA binding proteins specific for sites Ila and Ilb and that the DNA binding specificity and affinity of PCFl are similar to that of PCF2. lntroduction of this mutated se- quence in the rice PCNA promoter leads to a loss of the pro- moter activity (Kosugi et al., 1995).

We also examined the activities of site Ila binding in nu- clear extracts from rice suspension-cultured cells using a competition assay. When nuclear extracts were subjected to an EMSA using the Ila probe, a broadly shifted band of a DNA-protein complex was observed (Figure 1 B, lane 1). The

Table i. trans-Acting Effect of PCFl and PCF2 Clones on HIS3 Reporter Genes in Yeast

Reporter Gene

cDNA Clone CYCI- (Site lla),2- (Site Ilb),2- in pGAD424 HIS3 CYCI-HIS3 CYC1- HIS3

pGAD-PCF1 His- a His+ a His+ pGAD-PCF2 His- His+ His+

a His+ or His- represents a phenotype of transformants on histidine- free medium.

Cloning of PCF1 and PCF2 cDNA 1609

Ila AGGTGGGCCCGT x2mlla AGGTGGGCSaGT x2lib TGTGGGACCATG x2

protein(ng)probe

MBP-PCF1 MBP-PCF208 g § o gCM " «> fl ° •J CM jl

lla mlla libo g

«T CM g

Ha

B

probe

competitor llalla

mlla lib

mlla lib 8

3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101112131415161718 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Figure 1. Site lla-and Site lib-Specific Binding of PCF1, PCF2, and Nuclear Proteins.

(A) An EMSA using purified MBP-PCF1 and MBP-PCF2 fusion proteins. 32P-labeled DMA probes lla, mlla, and lib contain two copies of site lla,mutated site lla, and site lib sequences, respectively. The underlined nucleotides of mlla indicate an introduced mutation. Each probe was incu-bated with 4, 20, or 100 ng of recombinant proteins.(B) An EMSA of nuclear extracts from rice suspension-cultured cells. Rice nuclear extracts (2 |j.g) were mixed with the lla probe (50 fmol), andfive-, 25-, and 250-fold molar excess of lla (lanes 2 to 4), mlla (lanes 5 to 7), and lib (lanes 8 to 10) were added as competitor DMAs to the EMSAreactions. As a control, no competitor DMA was added (cont; lane 1).

addition of excess lla or lib competitor DNA abolished theformation of this complex in a concentration-dependentmanner (Figure 1B, lanes 2 to 4 and 8 to 10), although thiswas not observed when an mlla competitor was used (Fig-ure 1B, lanes 5 to 7), indicating that nuclear proteins thatbind to site lla are specific for sites lla and lib. These resultsdemonstrate similar binding specificities between recombi-nant proteins and proteins in nuclear extracts.

Binding Activity of Site lla in Nuclear ExtractsContains PCF2

To confirm that the binding activity of sites lla or lib in rice nu-clear extracts contains PCF2, we performed an EMSA usingan antibody raised against recombinant MBP-PCF2C (a MBPfusion with the C-terminal region of PCF2). Immunoblot anal-ysis using rice nuclear extracts showed that IgG fractions pre-pared from anti—MBP-PCF2 antiserum were specific for thePCF2 protein (Figure 2A) because the preimmune serumgave no significant signals (data not shown). In addition,PCF2 was detected in rice leaf nuclear extracts from bothmeristematic lower regions and nonmeristematic upper re-gions of leaves, suggesting constitutive accumulation of thePCF2 protein in rice plants (Figure 2A). The molecular massof PCF2 detected by immunoblot analysis was ^35 kD,

which is close to the calculated 37 kD based on the aminoacid sequence of PCF2. To evaluate further the specificity ofanti—MBP-PCF2 polyclonal antibody, we performed anEMSA using recombinant thioredoxin (Trx)-PCF2. The su-pershift assay showed that the anti—MBP-PCF2 IgG frac-tion specifically reacted with the recombinant protein toform a supershift band (Figure 2B, lane 5), but a control IgG(anti —MBP-OsGBF IgG) from an antiserum raised againstan MBP fusion with a rice G-box binding factor did not (Fig-ure 2B, lane 4). Using the anti-PCF2 antibody, we performedan EMSA using leaf nuclear extracts from meristematic ornonmeristematic regions. Proteins that bound to a site lla-oligonucleotide probe were detected as broad bands in themiddle of columns in both nuclear extracts, indicating thatsite lla binding activity was nearly constitutive (Figure 2C).The addition of an anti—MBP-PCF2 IgG fraction producedsupershift bands in both fractions (meristematic and non-meristematic) of nuclear extracts (Figure 2C, lanes 6 and 7).However, the strength of the signal was considerably higherin meristematic compared with nonmeristematic tissue. Acontrol antibody, anti —MBP-OsGBF IgG, failed to show su-pershift band formation (Figure 2C, lanes 4 and 5), and theanti —MBP-PCF2 IgG itself contained no activity for site llabinding (Figure 2C, lane 1).

These findings indicate that the formation of the supershiftband results from interaction between anti-PCF2 antibody

1610 The Plant Cell

M NM

/ / /I M NM M NM M

Figure 2. PCF2 Contained in Site lla Binding Activities in Rice Nuclear Extracts.

(A) Immunoblot analysis for PCF2 in rice nuclear extracts. Nuclear extracts (12 ̂ g of protein per lane) prepared from the lower (M, meristematic)and upper (NM, nonmeristematic) regions of rice leaves were fractionated on an SDS-polyacrylamide gel and probed with anti —MBP-PCF2polyclonal antibodies. The gel mobilities of the markers and their native molecular masses (in kilodaltons) are indicated at right.(B) Supershift assay with the recombinant PCF2 protein. An EMSA was performed, as given in Figure 1. The recombinant fusion protein Trx-PCF2 (10 ng) was mixed with the lla probe labeled with phosphorus-32 (lanes 3 to 5). Subsequently, 1.3 p.g of the anti —MBP-PCF2 ([+] lane 5)or the anti —MBP-OsGBF ([+] lane 4) IgG fraction, as a control, was added to the reaction. As an alternative control, 30 ng of the recombinantprotein Trx was incubated with the lla probe (lanes 1 and 2), and the anti-MBP-PCF2 IgG fraction was added (lane 2). In lanes 1 and 3, no serum(IgG fraction) was added to the EMSA reaction. An arrow marks a supershift band.(C) Supershift assay with rice nuclear extracts. Nuclear extracts (2.5 ̂ g) from the lower (meristematic [M], lanes 2, 4, and 6) and upper (nonmer-istematic [NM], lanes 3, 5, and 7) regions of rice leaves were mixed with the lla probe labeled with phosphorus-32. Subsequently, 1.3 p,g of theanti —MBP-PCF2 ([+] lanes 6 and 7) or the anti — MBP-OsGBF ([+] lanes 4 and 5) IgG fraction, as a control, was added to 10 nL of the reactionmixtures. In a second control, no serum (IgG) was added (lanes 2 and 3). The anti —MBP-PCF2 IgG (1.3 \i.g) was incubated with the DNA probealone, as a third control (lane 1). An arrow marks supershift bands.

and site lla binding proteins and that proteins responsiblefor site lla binding activities in rice nuclear extracts containPCF2. These results further suggest that the DNA bindingactivity of PCF2 is higher in actively dividing cells than innondividing cells, although the protein level is the same inboth types of cells.

Structure of PCF1 and PCF2

Sequence analysis of the PCF1 and PCF2 cDNAs showedthat these inserts were in frame with the GAL4 activation do-main. Because the lengths of their mRNAs estimated fromRNA gel blot analysis were ~0.9 kb for PCF1 and 1.7 kb for

PCF2, they appeared to have partial sequences. By usingthe plaque hybridization method, we isolated nearly full-length cDNA clones for PCF1 and PCF2 as probes of theoriginally isolated cDNAs, although the clones contained noin-frame stop codon upstream of the first ATG. The cDNAclones for PCF1 and PCF2 contained 840- and 1520-bp in-serts, respectively, and these open reading frames encoded183 and 373 amino acid residues, respectively (Figures 3Aand 3B). Comparative analysis of PCF1 and PCF2 showed aconserved region consisting of 68 amino acids in their N-ter-minal regions. The conserved amino acid sequence showed71 % homology, whereas other regions showed no se-quence similarities. We used the deduced PCF1 and PCF2amino acid sequences to search the Swiss-Prot database,

Cloning of PCFl and PCF2 cDNA 161 1

A PCFl but no protein with a similar sequence was found. Although we failed to find a characteristic motif for transcription fac- tors in primary amino acid structures, the secondary struc- tures predicted by computer analysis indicated that the conserved region would contain an HLH structure. Because a stretch of the basic amino acid-rich region locates up- stream of the predicted HLH structure, it appears that the conserved regions contain a bHLH motif. A search for the conserved sequence, using GenBank and EMBL databases, indicated that translated amino acids sequences from seven Arabidopsis and one rice expressed sequence tags showed >70% homology with the conserved amino acid sequence (Figure 4). This finding suggests that PCFl and PCF2 are members of a nove1 family of proteins.

CTCCTCCGACGGCCCCACCCCTCCCCGCCGCGTCAGGCCCAGGMGl'CCCCCTCCTCCTCCGA 180 S S D G A T P R R V R P R K S P S S S D 5 8

CCCCCACTCCMffiTCCCCGGCCffiGCCGCCGCGl'CCGCAT~ffiGCCA~GffiCCGC 240 R H S K V A C R C R R V R I P A H V A A ~ ~

CCGCGTCTrrUICCKACCCGCGAGC~CffiCCACffiUCCGAffiffiGAGACCATCCffiX 3 O0

PCF2

I A A 1 G T G T V P - A I A T T V D C V L l 4 6 CCGCMCCCCACCCffiTCGTCGTCGTCC~mGCCCffiCCTCCTCC~ffiTCGTCC~GG 600

R I P T 0 S I S S S C P A S S A V V D G 1 6 6

Figure 3. Nucleotide Sequences of PCFl and PCF2 cDNAs and Their Deduced Amino Acid Sequences.

(A) The nucleotide sequence of the PCFl cDNA and its deduced amino acid sequence. A bHLH region in a conserved domain with homology to PCF2 is underlined. A dashed line indicates an addi- tional C-terminal region of the conserved domain (CC region).

DNA Binding Domain in PCFl and PCFP

A DNA binding domain in PCFl was defined, and the role of the putative bHLH domain in the DNA binding was con- firmed. To test the DNA binding abilities of PCFl mutants, we used the yeast one-hybrid system rather than an in vitro assay because only very small amounts of stably solubilized recombinant proteins were obtained from some of the mu- tants. Three deletion mutants of PCFl were generated and cloned into the pGAD424 vector to fuse with the GAL4 acti- vation domain in the vector (Figure 5A). These constructs and the originally isolated pGAD-PCF1, with a region ex- tending from residues 25 to 183 in the PCFl amino acid se- quence, were introduced into a yeast strain carrying the (site Ila),,-CYC7-H/S3 reporter gene. These constructs were en- gineered based on the assumption that if the PCFl mutants retain site Ila binding ability, the GAL4ad-PCFl fusions ex- pressed in the yeast would activate the reporter gene through binding to the site Ila sequence. pGAD-PCF(b1 -cl), containing the conserved region, including residues 51 to 120 of the PCFl amino acid sequence, activated the HIS3 reporter gene (Figure 56). The number and growth rate of colonies appearing on the histidine-free medium were indis- tinguishable from those of the pGAD-PCF1 -introduced colony. Deletion of the basic region (PCF1 [b2]) or C-terminal region of the conserved domain (CC region) preceded by the putative HLH region (PCF1 [c2]) completely failed to yield histidine-auxotrophic yeast, abolishing the DNA binding abil- ity of PCF1. These results suggest that the conserved region

Arrowheads denote the 5' and 3' termini of the original cDNA clone obtained by the yeast one-hybrid screen. (B) The nucleotide sequence of the PCF2 cDNA and its deduced amino acid sequence. The bHLH and CC regions and DNA termini of the originally isolated clone are marked as given in (A). The nucleotide sequences of the PCFl and PCF2 cDNAs have Gen- Bank accession numbers DE7260 and D87261, respectively.

161 2 The Plant Cell

P c F l PcF2 ATTS2702 836373 ATTS3707 T46773 836511 T88453 T13768 R46844

Figure 4. Comparison of the Conserved Regions of PCFl and PCF2 with Sequences Translated from Arabidopsis and Rice Expressed Se- quence Tags.

Sequences ATTS2702 to T13768 are from amino acid sequences translated from Arabidopsis expressed sequence tags. They show significant homology to the region containing a putative bHLH motif conserved between PCFl and PCF2. Sequence R46844 is from a rice expressed se- quence tag. Solid boxes indicate conserved amino acids; open boxes indicate amino acids similar to the conserved one. The bHLH region is in- dicated at top.

containing a predicted bHLH region in PCFl acts as a bHLH motif responsible for specific DNA binding. The corresponding conserved region of PCF2 is also likely to be necessary for DNA binding because this common domain is the only re- gion conserved between PCFI and PCF2.

Dimerization of PCFI and PCFS

It is well documented that bHLH transcription factors bind their cognate DNA sequence as a homodimer or a het- erodimer with other partners. Because of the likelihood of dimerization between PCFl and PCF2 (containing a bHLH motif), we assayed the affinity of PCFl and PCF2 proteins for homologous and heterologous interactions by using the yeast two-hybrid system. PCFl chimeric proteins, each with a GAL4 DNA binding domain and activation domain, inter- acted with each other and activated GALl-IacZ and GALl- HIS3 reporter genes, indicating the formation of a homo- dimer of PCF1. Similar results were obtained for PCF2 fusions (Table 2). Moreover, when PCFl and PCF2 proteins were coexpressed in yeast, compared with a homologous inter- action between PCFl or PCF2, at least a fivefold increase in activation of the reporter gene was observed. This suggests that PCFl and PCF2 preferentially bind DNA as a het- erodimer rather than as a homodimer. In addition, to exam- ine the involvement of the CC region in dimer formation, a PCFl deletion mutant PCFl (bl -h) containing a bHLH region but lacking the CC region was also generated. This mutant lost the ability to interact with wild-type PCFl and PCF2. The data from this study clearly show that the CC region is essential for protein-protein interactions among PCFs. To- gether with the fact that deletion of the CC region resulted in the loss of DNA binding ability of PCFl, as shown in Figure 56, these results strongly suggest that dimer formation is essential for DNA binding.

Expression of mRNAs for PCFl and PCFS

Finally, we also performed RNA gel blot analysis to examine cell specificity for the accumulation of PCFl and PCF2 tran- scripts. Total RNAs were extracted from leaves, seedlings,

A 25 bask HLH 183

F#l

PCFl[blCl]

P21

PCFl[C2] 2

B Effector Plasmid Phenotype

pGAD-PCF1 His+ pGAD-PCF1 [bl-cl] His+ pGAD-PCF1 [b2] His- pGAD-PCF1 [C21 HiS-

Figure 5. Localization of the DNA Binding Domain of PCFl.

(A) Schematic representation of PCFl and truncated versions. The PCFl cDNA in pGAD424, originally isolated by library screening, was used in this analysis. Truncated fragments of the PCFl cDNA were generated by PCR and cloned into pGAD424 to produce the GAL4 activation domain fusions. Shaded and solid boxes represent basic and helix-loop-helix regions, respectively; hatched boxes rep- resent the CC regions. (8) The trans-acting effect of truncated PCFls fused with the GAL4 activation domain on (site Ila),,-CYC1-H/S3 reporter gene in yeast. The pGAD-PCF constructs were introduced into a yeast strain car- rying the YIH2a reporter gene. His+ and His- indicate phenotypes of transformants that are able and unable to grow on histidine-free me- dium, respectively.

Cloning of PCF1 and PCF2 cDNA 1613

Table 2. Yeast Two-Hybrid Assay for the Interaction between PCF1and PCF2

Fusion withGAL4bda

pGBT-PCFI +PGBT-PCF2 +pGBT-PCF1 +PGBT-PCF2 +pGBT-PCFI +PGBT-PCF2 +pGBT-PCF1(b1-h) +pGBT-PCF1(b1-h) +

Fusion withGAL4adb

PGAD424pGAD424pGAD-PCF1pGAD-PCF2pGAD-PCF2pGAD-PCFIpGAD-PCF1PGAD-PCF2

Reporter Gene

H/S3C

His-His~His+

His+

His+

His+

His-His-

lacZ (unit)d

<0.1<0.1

2.42.7

3016<0.1<0.1

aGAL4bd, GAL4 DMA binding domain.bGAL4ad, GAL4 activation domain.0 His+ or His" represents a phenotype of transformed yeast on histi-dine-free medium.d Values represent means of p-galactosidase activities from three in-dependent colonies. Unit is defined as the amount that hydrolyzes1 jimol of o-nitrophenyl (3-D-galactopyranoside per minute.

and suspension-cultured cells. Leaves were separated intoupper, middle, and lower regions, as illustrated in Figure 6,to compare differences in their transcripts in tissues or cellswith different levels of cell proliferation. The lower region ofleaves contained the greatest number of dividing cells com-pared with the upper and middle regions, as shown in thehybridized signal for rice PCNA gene transcripts (Figure 6).Seedlings and suspension-cultured cells also appeared tocontain actively dividing cells, as shown by the expressionof the PCNA gene (Figure 6). Both PCF1 and PCF2 tran-scripts were abundant in the lower region of leaves, whereasless transcript accumulation was detected in the upper re-gion of leaves. The expression of the PCF1 and PCF2 genesas well as the PCNA gene appeared, in general, to begrowth regulated.

DISCUSSION

Cloning of the PCF1 and PCF2 cDNAs That Bind toSites Ma and lib

c/s-Acting elements located at positions -197 and -178 ofthe rice PCNA promoter were recognized by nuclear pro-teins that had near-identical binding preferences (Kosugi etal., 1995). In this study, we isolated two cDNA clones thatencode DNA binding proteins specific for sites Ha and lib.Our results show that in N-terminal regions, both PCF1 andPCF2 proteins contain a conserved region consisting of aputative bHLH domain and an adjacent C-terminal region(CC region). Our data strongly suggest that this conserved

region is responsible for DNA binding and the ability todimerize. Because this conserved sequence has been foundin several expressed sequence tags of unknown function inArabidopsis and rice, PCF1 and PCF2 could be classified asmembers of a novel family of transcription factors that isconserved in monocotyledons and dicotyledons. The obser-vations that the rice PCNA promoter also functions in to-bacco plants and that nuclear proteins binding to sites llaand lib are present in rice and tobacco nuclear extracts fur-ther support this view (Kosugi et al., 1995). In addition, sitella- and/or lib-protein complexes detected as broadly shiftedbands in an EMSA with nuclear extracts (Figures 1 and 2) mayrepresent multimembers of the PCF protein family.

The Unique bHLH Motif in PCF1 and PCF2 Is Distinctfrom bHLH Proteins Binding to the E-Box

In animals, the bHLH transcription factors, represented byMyoD, c-Myc, and the upstream stimulatory factor, bind tothe E-box (CANNTG; N stands for any nucleotide) in promot-ers as homodimers or heterodimers and regulate transcrip-tion of a variety of genes involved in cell proliferation anddifferentiation (Blackwell and Weintraub, 1990; Blackwell etal., 1990). Plant bHLH proteins, B and R gene products from

PCF1

PCF2

PCNA

n

EtBrf*^^^^^^^^^^B

UJLLiFigure 6. PCF1 and PCF2 mRNA Levels in Rice Tissues and Cells.

Rice leaf RNA was isolated from the lower, middle, and upper partsof leaves, as illustrated. RNAs were isolated from 7-day-old seed-lings and rice suspension-cultured cells at mid-log phase. Total RNA(20 n,g) was loaded, and equal loading of the RNA was confirmed byethidium bromide (EtBr) staining. The full-length PCF1 and PCF2cDNAs and rice PCNA cDNA were radiolabeled and used for hybrid-ization.

1614 The Plant Cell

maize, and the de/ gene product from Antirrhinum regulate genes involved in anthocyanin biosynthesis through binding to promoter sites corresponding to the E-box (Goff et al., 1990; Ludwig et al., 1990; Roth et al., 1991; Goodrich et al., 1992). Although both PCFl and PCF2 share a bHLH motif predicted from their primary sequences, they do not bind to the E-box (data not shown) but to sites Ila (GTGGGCCCGT) and Ilb (ATGGTCCCAC). No homology in primary amino acid sequence was detected between known bHLH proteins and PCFs.

It is interesting that E2F is the only known transcription factor that does not bind the E-box, although it contains a bHLH motif required for DNA binding. In mammals and Drosophila, E2F is involved in the control of a variety of growth- and cell cycle-regulated genes that are required for entry into S phase (DeGregori et al., 1995; Duronio et al., 1995). Jordan et al. (1994) have found that the center of the basic region in E2Fs (E2F1 to E2F4) contains a proline and glycine, which may prevent a-helix formation throughout the length of the basic region. In contrast, in the E-box binding bHLH proteins, basic regions form an a-helical structure. Replacement of the proline-glycine pair in the basic region of E2F1 with alanines resulted in a significant reduction in binding to the E2F site (Jordan et al., 1994). The basic re- gions in PCFl and PCF2 also contain proline and glycine, which could prevent a-helix formation and distinguish the DNA binding property of PCFl and PCF2 from that of other bHLH proteins that bind to the E-box.

In addition, E2F, Spl , and Dscl, which are transcription factors that play an important role in the G, (Go)-to-S phase transition of the cell cycle in animals and yeast, have a com- mon feature in their preferred binding sequences-GC-rich sequences. The GC core in the consensus E2F site (TTT[G/ CJ[G/C]CGC) is sufficient for binding of E2F1 (Jordan et al., 1994). In this regard, the promoter regions of housekeeping genes, including DNA synthesis-related genes, contain GC- rich regions, and the specific bindings of these transcription factors to their cognate sites in the GC-rich regions are ex- pected to regulate DNA synthesis genes. Because the binding sequence of PCFl and PCF2 is also rich in GC nucleotides, PCFl and PCF2 might have some properties that are func- tionally analogous to Spl , Dscl, and especially E2F.

Function of PCFl and PCF2

Mutations of sites Ila and Ilb, to which PCFs specifically bind, in the rice promoter lead to a considerable reduction in the transcriptional activity in actively dividing cells but do not result in deregulated expression in nondividing cells (Kosugi et al., .1995). This suggests that sites Ila and Ilb function as positive cis-acting elements in the rice promoter. Further- more, gain-of-function analysis of site Ila with a heterologous promoter demonstrated that site Ila mediates transcriptional activation (Kosugi et al., 1995). The PCFs and nuclear pro- teins that bind to sites Ila and Ilb appear to have common preferred binding sequences. In addition, results of the EMSA

using the anti-PCF2 antibody indicated that the binding ac- tivities of site Ila in nuclear extracts are at least in part from PCF2 and probably also from PCF1. Thus, it is likely that the PCF family is involved in a positive regulation of the rice PCNA gene in proliferating cells through binding to sites Ila and Ilb. In addition, the observation that the heterodimeric in- teraction between PCFl and PCF2 was considerably stron- ger than their homodimeric interaction implies that members of the PCF family may form homodimers and heterodimers with other cell type-specific or temporal-specific members and regulate the transcription of DNA synthesis-related genes such as the PCNA gene.

PCFl and PCF2 transcripts are abundant in actively divid- ing cells, whereas their proteins, as well as site Ila and/or site Ilb binding activities in nuclear extracts, appear to exist in both dividing and nondividing cells. The latter observation does not correlate with the expression of PCNA protein, which is not present in quiescent cells (Daidoji et al., 1992). Similar examples that accumulation of transcripts and pro- teins do not correlate have also been observed in many stud- ies with histone genes. Accumulation of PCFl and PCF2 transcripts may be high in actively dividing cells to maintain a constant leve1 of PCF proteins in newly formed cells.

Binding activities of site Ila and/or site Ilb are present in nuclear extracts from dividing and nondividing cells. This is apparently inconsistent with the fact that sites Ila and Ilb function as positive cis-acting elements in the rice PCNA promoter. Hence, the binding activities of site Ila and/or site Ilb in dividing cells should be functionally different from those in nondividing cells. The supershift assay using the anti-PCF2 antibody showed that the DNA binding activity of PCF2 was higher in nuclear extracts from actively dividing cells than from nondividing cells. This observation suggests that some members of the PCF protein family may function as transcriptional activators in dividing cells, whereas other members act as transcriptional repressors in nondividing cells. In this view, PCF2 has the potential to act as a tran- scriptional activator of the PCNA gene.

Another possible mechanism by which PCFs could medi- ate activation of PCNA gene expression in dividing cells might be analogous to the mechanism in the animal system. Transcription factors E2F and Spl control growth-regulated genes in animals and are present throughout the cell cycle (Mudryj et al., 1990; Shirodkar et al., 1992; Lin et al., 1996). However, certain regulatory mechanisms, including protein- protein interactions, prevent these factors from activating growth-regulated genes in quiescent cells. PCFl and PCF2 may also control PCNA gene expression by interacting with other proteins. The results of an EMSA using nuclear ex- tracts from tissues with a low competence for cell division showed the presence of site Ila-protein complexes with a slow mobility (Figure 2). It is possible that other proteins in- teract with PCFs in nondividing cells, resulting in slow mo- bility in EMSAs. However, it is also possible that some high molecular mass PCFs are present in nondividing cells or that degradation of PCFs is promoted in actively dividing cells.

Cloning of PCFl and PCF2 cDNA 1615

It is conceivable that if a protein interacts with PCFs in nondividing cells, it might function as a transcriptional re- pressor like the E2F-retinoblastoma (RB) complex. In this regard, a member of the RB protein family has been identi- fied recently in maize (Grafi et al., 1996; Xie et al., 1996). The pocket proteins, including RB, negatively regulate the G1 (Go)-to-S phase transition of the cell cycle interacting with E2F. Nagar et al. (1995) have found that the replication pro- tein of a plant DNA geminivirus, tomato golden mosaic virus, induces PCNA in terminally differentiated cells of the host plant. In addition, the replication protein of a wheat dwarf geminivirus forms a stable complex with a member of the RB protein family (Xie et al., 1995). These proteins are analo- gous to the oncoproteins of animal DNA tumor viruses and suggest the presence of cell cycle-regulatory factors that are sequestered from a complex with a plant RB homolog by the replication protein of geminiviruses in plants, as oc- curs in the E2F-RB complex in animals. Together with the fact that PCFs have some features related to E2F as stated, it is also possible that in plants, PCFs interact with members of the RB protein family to regulate the cell cycle-associated genes, including the rice PCNA gene.

In summary, we analyzed the rice PCNA gene to under- stand the mechanisms controlling the G1 (Go)-to-S phase transition in the plant cell cycle. The cis-acting elements, sites Ila and Ilb, regulating the rice PCNA gene seem to mediate transcriptional activation at the G1 (G,)-to-S phase boundary, as described previously. PCFl and PCF2 that specifically bind to sites Ila and Ilb may act as transcription factors to control DNA synthesis-related genes in plants. In particular, PCF2, with a high leve1 of DNA binding activity in meristematic tis- sues, may act as a transcriptional activator of these genes.

METHODS

Construction of Plasmids

To construct reporter genes for the yeast one-hybrid screening, an iso-I-cytochrome c CYC7 minimal promoter extending from positions +49 to -178 and the HIS3 coding region were isolated by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) with specific primer pairs 5 ‘-

3’ and 5‘-GGACTTCTAGAGTGTTTGCGTGTCTATAGAAG-3’ for CYC7 and 5’-TCTAGAGGATCCAAAGATGATGACAGAGCAGAAAGATGCCCTAG-3 and 5’-GTCGACGAATTCTCACTACATAAGAACACCTTTGGTGG-3’ for HIS3 as a template for Saccharomyces cerevisiae genomic DNA. PCR was petformed with Ex Taq polymerase (Takara, Tokyo, Japan), using standard conditions. The nucleotide sequences of the PCR products were verified by sequencing. The CYC7 promoter region was inserted into the Sacll-Xbal sites of pBluescript SK+ (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA). The HIS3 coding sequence was inserted into the Xbal-EcoRI sites of the construct in which the CYC7 promoter was inserted to produce a CYC7-HIS3 construct. Fragments corresponding to 12- repeated site Ila (site Ila)lp and 12-repeated site Ilb (site lIb)lP oligo- mers were generated by annealing and ligating oligonucleotides

GGACTCCGCGGCTCGAGCAGATCCGCCAGGCGTGTATATAGCG-

5’-TCGAGGTGGGCCCGTAGGTGGGCCCGTATGCA-3‘ (where un- derlining indicates two copies of the 12mers of site Ila) and 5’-T&- GGGCCCACCTACGGGCCCACC-3’ for site Ila and 5’-ACTCCATGx- TCCCAC-3’ and 5’-AGTGTGGGACCATGG-3’ for site Ilb. In these re- porter genes, the intention of using the 12 copies of sites Ila and Ilb is based on the idea that increasing copies of the binding sites would reinforce the binding of PCFs (PCNA gene-controlling element bind- ing factors) to the sites and facilitate the interaction of PCFs with components of the basal transcription machinery.

After cloning these fragments in the Smal site of the pBluescript SK+ vector, each fragment excised with Sacl and EcoRV was in- serted into Sacl and blunt-ended Sacll sites of the CYC7-HIS3 con- struct. Fragments corresponding to (site Ila),2-CYC7-HIS3 and (site IIb),,-CYC7-HIS3 were excised with Sacl, treated with T4 poly- merase, and then digested with EcoRI. Fragments were then cloned in the EcoRl and blunt-ended Aatll sites of a yeast integration vector, which was generated by deleting the EcoRI-Aatll fragment from pGBT9 vector (Bartel et al., 1993a) (ClonTech, Palo Alto, CA). The re- sulting reporter constructs, YIH2a and YIH2b, are integration vectors harboring the HIS3 reporter gene directed by 12 copies of site Ila and site Ilb, respectively. A control construct, YIH, containing the CYC7- HIS3 gene was generated from the construct given above by deleting the 12-repeated site Ila region.

For plasmid construction for maltose binding protein (MBP) fu- sions with PCFl and PCF2, the cDNA inserts from the originally iso- lated pGAPPCF1 and pGAD-PCF2 clones were inserted in the EcoRl and BamHl sites of the pMAL-c2 vector, respectively (New En- gland Biolabs, Beverly, MA). For a thioredoxin (lrx) fusion, the full- length PCF2 cDNA was excised with EcoRl and Sal1 and inserted into the corresponding sites of pET32b (Novagen, Madison, WI). For con- structs for the production of antiserum against a MBP-PCF2 fusion, the Sall-Hindlll fragment corresponding to the C-terminal210 amino acids of PCF2 was inserted in frame with the MBP-coding sequence of pMAL-c2 to generate pMAL-PCF2C.

To generate a pGBT-PCF1 construct, the EcoRI-BamHI-restricted fragment of the originally isolated pGAD-PCFI clone was inserted into the corresponding sites of pGBT9. The full-length coding region of PCF2 was also inserted into pGAD424 (Bartel et al., 1993a) (Clon- Tech) and pGBT9 vectors in frame to generate pGAD-PCF2 and pGBT-PCF2. Deletion mutants of PCFl , pGAD-PCFI (bl -cl), PGAD- PCFl(b2), and PGAD-PCFl(c2), were generated by cloning PCFI deletion fragments produced by PCR. PCR was petformed as a template of the pGAD-PCFI plasmid with PCFl -specific primers b l (5’-CACTCAGAAlTCAGGAAGTCCCCCTCCTCCTCCGAC-3‘), CI (5‘-CACTCAGGATCCCGCCTCCTCCGGGGTGAC-3’), b2 (5’-GTC- ATCGAATTCGACCGTCACTCCAAGGTCG-3’), ~2 (5’-GTCATAGGA- TCCGCCCGTCCCGGTGGCGGCGATG-3), GAL4ad (5‘-TAATACCAC- TACAATGGATG-3’), and TADHj (5’-AAlTGAGATGGTGCACGATG-3).

Primers b l and b2 and primers c l and c2 were specific for the ba- sic and C-terminal regions of the conserved domain of PCF1, re- spectively. GAL4ad and TADHl primers were specific for GAL4 activation domain and alcohol dehydrogenase ADH7 terminator re- gions in pGAD424. Fragments amplified with primer pairs b l and cl , b2 and TADH1, and GAL4ad and c2 were digested with EcoRl and BamHl and cloned in pGAD424. The pGBT-PCFl(b1-h) construct was generated by cloning a fragment extending from the basic re- gion to the latter helix region in the helix-loop-helix (HLH) domain of PCFl into pGBT9. This fragment was produced by PCR with primer set b l and h2 (5 ’-AATTCGAGACCATCGAGTGGCTACTCCGC- CAGGCCGAG-3‘). The integrity of the cloned sequences was veri- fied by sequencing.

1616 The Plant Cell

Yeast Transformation and Yeast Two-Hybrid Assay

Yeast was grown in YEPD or SD synthetic medium, as described in Rose et al. (1990). Yeast transformation was performed by the lith- ium-polyethylene glycol method (Ito et al., 1983). A typical transfor- mation yielded 2 to 5 X 104 transformants per pg of plasmid DNA. lntegrative transformation was achieved as follows. The YIH2a, YIHPb, and YIH constructs were linearized at the Munl site within the Trp7 coding region and targeted to a trp7 locus of a yeast strain (MATaura3-52 lys2-801 ade2-701 trpl-A63 his3-A200 leu2-Al; ob- tained from the lnstitute for Fermentation, Osaka, Japan). Total DNA from severa1 colonies showing growth on an SD synthetic tryp- tophan-free medium and no growth on histidine-free medium was extracted to confirm the integration of reporter genes into the yeast genome. Confirmation that the transformants carried no plasmid DNA and that entire regions of the reporter genes were retained on genomic DNA was established by PCR with two-combinatorial primer sets-TA,,,, the 3’ specific CYC7 primer, and a primer (5’- AGGGTTATTGTCTCATGAGCG-3’) corresponding to positions 4009 to 4029 on the pGBT9 vector.

The yeast two-hybrid assay was performed by simultaneous trans- formation with the pGAD424- and pGBT9-based plasmids. The yeast strains HF7c (Feilotter et al., 1994) and SFy526 (Bartel et al., 1993b) were used for assays with the HlS3 and lacZ reporter genes, respec- tively. The transformed HF7c was tested for growth on the synthetic medium without leucine, tryptophan, and histidine. The transformed SFY526 grown on leucine- and tryptophan-free medium was assayed for P-galactosidase activity. Quantitative P-galactosidase assay using o-nitrophenyl P-D-galactopyranoside was performed according to the method described previously by Yocum et al. (1984).

Yeast One-Hybrid Screening

The cDNA yeast expression library was produced as follows. Ran- dom primed cDNA was synthesized from poly(A)+ RNA prepared from rice suspension-cultured cells (Ogm sativa cv Nipponbare) us- ing a cDNA synthesis kit (Pharmacia). The cDNAs, to which EcoRl adapters were ligated, were inserted into a pGAD424 vector predi- gested with EcoRl followed by treatment with calf intestine alkaline phosphatase. The library was transformed into Escherichia coli DH5a by electroporation, and a total of 1.8 X 1 O6 independent colo- nies were amplified for plasmid extraction.

A 500-mL culture of the yeast strain carrying the YIH2a reporter gene was transformed with a total of 50 pg of the cDNA library and 2.5 mg of denatured salmon sperm DNA as a carrier DNA. Approxi- mately 5 x 106 Leu+ transformants were incubated overnight in

’ liquid SD synthetic leucine- and ttyptophan-free medium for expres- sion of the introduced genes. The yeast was then collected by cen- trifugation and plated on SD medium lacking leucine, tryptophan, and histidine for 4 days at 30°C. Approximately 5 X 103 colonies were pooled, and plasmid DNA was isolated from the transformants. The rescued plasmids were reintroduced into the yeast strain carry- ing YIH2a for the second screening. More than 1 8 colonies per pg of plasmid appeared on the leucine- and histidine-free medium. About 30 colonies were randomly collected from the Leu+ His+ colonies, and plasmid DNAs were extracted from the culture of each colony. For further elimination of false-positive clones, the plasmids rescued next were each introduced into a yeast strain carrying the YIH2a or YIH2b reporter gene, thus confirming whether the His’ phenotype of the transformants depended on the site Ila or site Ilb element in the

reporter gene. Plasmids that activated both (site Ila),T and (site Ilb),,-CYCl-H/S3 reporter genes but not the CYC7-HlS3 gene were characterized further by restriction mapping and sequence analysis us- ing a dye-terminator cycle sequencing kit (Applied Biosystems, Fos- ter City, CA) and a DNA sequencer (model373A; Applied Biosystems).

The full-length cDNAs for PCFl and PCF2 were isolated from the oligo(dT)-primed cDNA library of rice leaves and suspension-cultured cells constructed in AZAP (Stratagene). Approximately 1 O6 plaques were transferred onto Hybond N membranes (Amersham lnternational) and hybridized at 68°C with 32P-labeled 550- and 900-bp probes cor- responding to inserts of the original PCFl and PCF2 clones isolated by the yeast one-hybrid screen, respectively. Two and five positive phages were isolated for PCFI and PCF2, respectively, and the plas- mids excised in vivo from these phages were sequenced.

Production of MBP and Trx Fusion Proteins

The pMAL-c2 and pET32 constructs carrying PCFI or PCF2 cDNA were introduced into E. coli (XLI -Blue for pMAL-c2 and BL21 [DE31 for the pET32 plasmid). E. coli was cultured in Terrific broth (Ausubel et al., 1987) until ODGOo reached -1 .O. In the next step, isopropyl p-o- thiogalactopyranoside in a final concentration of 0.5 mM was added and incubated for 3 hr at 37°C. Proteins were extracted with a buffer consisting of 20 mM Hepes-NaOH, pH 7.8, 1 M NaCI, 1 mM EDTA, 2 mM DTT, and 0.1% Triton X-100. MBP fusion proteins from ex- tracted proteins were isolated by one-step purification with an amy- lose resin (New England Biolabs) column, according to the instructions provided by the manufacturer. The Trx fusion, containing a six-histi- dine tag, was purified with a nickel-chelate matrix, according to the in- structions provided by the manufacturer (Novagen).

Production of Antiserums Raised against PCFP

The fusion protein of the C-terminal region of PCF2 with MBP as produced in E. coli transformed with the pMAL-PCF2C consf?ct. The protein was purified with an amylose resin column, emulsified in Freund’s complete or incomplete adjuvant, and injected into New Zealand white rabbits to produce the anti-MBP-PCF2 antibody. In a similar way, the anti-MBP-OsGBF antibody was produced using a recombinant MBP fusion with a rice G-box binding factor (OsGBF), whose cDNA has been recently isolated in our laboratory (S. Kosugi and Y. Ohashi, unpublished results). From the antiserums, each IgG fraction was prepared by precipitating IgG with a saturated ammo- nium sulfate solution (Ausubel et al., 1987).

Preparation of Nuclear Extracts

Nuclear extracts from leaves and suspension-cultured cells of rice (cv Nipponbare) were prepared as described previously by our labo- ratory (Kosugi et al., 1995). The leaf extracts were prepared from the upper and lower regions of leaves.

Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assays

DNA probes were generated by annealing oligonucleotides spanning the regions of interest and by filling in the single-strand overhangs with CL-~~P-~CTP using the Klenow fragment of DNA polymerase I. Binding reactions were performed using a volume of 10 pL contain-

Cloning of PCFl and PCF2 cDNA 161 7

ing 50 fmol of oligonucleotide probe, 0.1 to 1 .O pg poly(d1-dC), 1 x binding buffer (20 mM Hepes-KOH, pH 7.8, 100 mM KCI, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM DTT, 0.05% BSA, and 10% glycerol), and 5 to 100 ng of the recombinant protein or 2.0 to 2.5 pg of protein from the nuclear extracts. The mixtures were incubated for 30 min at room tempera- ture and loaded on native 5% polyacrylamide (acrylamide-bisacryl- amide, 29:l [w/w]) gels. For electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSAs) with specific antibodies, anti-lgG fractions were added to preincubated (1 5 min) reaction mixtures, and the mixtures were incu- bated for another 30 min at room temperature. Electrophoresis was conducted at 4 V/cm for 40 min with 0.5 X TBE (45 mM Tris-borate and 0.5 mM EDTA, pH 8.2) buffer at room temperature. Gels were dried and autoradiographed using intensifying screens.

lmmunoblot Analysis

Nuclear extracts prepared from the upper and lower regions of rice leaves were electrophoresed on 12.5% SDS-polyacrylamide gels (12 pg of nuclear protein per lane) and transferred to an lmmobilon membrane (Millipore, Bedford, MA). The membranes were blocked for 1 hr with a blocking buffer (PBS containing 0.2% casein and 0.1 % Tween 20), incubated with a 1:500 (v/v) dilution (13 pg/mL) of the polyclonal anti-MBP-PCF2 IgG fraction in blocking buffer for 1 hr at 25"C, and then washed three times with blocking buffer. Antibodies bound to the filters were detected by incubation with 1 :2000 (v/v) dilu- tion of alkaline phosphataswonjugated anti-rabbit IgG followed by visualization with a CSPD chemiluminescent substrate, according to the instructions provided by the manufacturer (Tropix, Bedford, MA).

RNA Gel Blot Analysis

Total RNA was isolated from different tissues and suspension-cul- tured cells, as described previously (Kirk and Kirk, 1985). RNA (20 pg) was fractionated in 1 % formaldehyde-agarose gels and trans- ferred to a nylon filter (Hybond N+; Amersham International), accord- ing to the method of Sambrook et ai. (1989). Ethidium bromide (25 pg/mL) was added to each sample to allow visualization of RNA un- der UV light to confirm equal loading of each sample. Hybridization was petformed at 68°C in a solution containing 0.2 M Na,.HPO,, pH 7.2, 1 mM EDTA, 7% SDS, and 1% blocking reagent (Boehringer Mannheim). Filters were washed twice in a buffer containing 20 mM Na2.HP04, pH 7.2, and 1 % SDS at room temperature followed by a single washing at 68°C. DNA probes were prepared from gel-purified fragments of the full-length PCFl, PCF2, and rice PCNA cDNAs and labeled with w~*P-~CTP, using a Redi-primed labeling kit (Amer- sham International).

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Dr. Kamal A. Malik for a critical review of the manuscript. This work and S.K. were supported by Enhancement of Center of Ex- cellence, Special Coordination Funds for Promoting Science and Technology, Science and Technology Agency, Japan.

Received April 28, 1997; accepted July 14, 1997.

REFERENCES

Almendral, J.M., Huebsch, D., Blundell, P.A., MacDonald-Bravo, H., and Bravo, R. (1987). Cloning and sequence of the human nuclear protein cyclin: Homology with DNA binding proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 84,1575-1579.

Ausubel, F.M., Brent, R., Kingston, R.E., Moore, D.D., Seidman, J.G., Smith, J.A., and Struhl, K., eds (1987). Current Protocols in Molecular Biology. (New York: John Wiley and Sons).

Bartel, P.L., Chien, C.-T., Sternglanz, R., and Fields, S. (1993a). Using the two-hybrid system to detect protein-protein interactions. In Cellular lnteractions in Development: A Practical Approach, D.A. Hartley, ed (Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press), pp. 153-179.

Bartel, P.L., Chien, C.-T., Sternglanz, R., and Fields, S. (1993b). Elimination of false positives that arise in using the two-hybrid system. BioTechniques 14, 920-924.

Blackwell, T.K., and Weintraub, H. (1 990). Differences and similari- ties in DNA-binding preferences of MyoD and E2A protein com- plexes revealed by binding site selection. Science 250, 11 04-1 11 O.

Blackwell, T.K., Kretzner, L., Blackwood, E.M., Eisenman, R.N., and Weintraub, H. (1990). Sequence-specific DNA binding by the c-Myc protein. Science 250,1149-1 151.

Bravo, R., Frank, R., Blundell, P.A., and MacDonald-Bravo, H. (1 987). Cyclin/PCNA is the auxiliary protein of DNA polymerase delta. Nature 326, 515-517.

Dahl, M., Meskiene, I., Bogre, L., Ha, D.T.C., Swoboda, I., Hubmann, R., Hirt, H., and Heberle-Bors, E. (1995). The D-type alfalfa cyclin gene cycMs4 complements G, cyclin-deficient yeast and is induced in the G, phase of the cell cycle. Plant Cell 7,

Daídoji, H., Takasakí, Y., and Nakane, P.K. (1 992). Proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA/cyclin) in plant proliferating cells: lmmunohistochemical and quantitative analysis using autoanti- body and murine monocl4al antibodies to PCNA. Cell Biochem. Funct. 10,123-1 32. '

DeGregori, J., Kowalik, T., and Nevins, J.R. (1 995). Cellular targets for activation by the E2F1 transcription factor include DNA synthe- sis- and GI/S-regulatory genes. MOI. Cell. Biol. 15,4215-4224.

Duronio, R.J., O'Farrell, P.H., Xie, J.E., Brook, A., and Dyson, N. (1995). The transcription factor E2F is required for S phase during Drosophila embryogenesis. Genes Dev. 9,1445-1 455.

Feilotter, H.E., Hannon, G.J., Ruddel, C.J., and Beach, D. (1994). Construction of an improved host strain for two hybrid screening. Nucleic Acids Res. 22, 1502-1 503.

1847-1 857.

Goff, S.A., Klein, T.M., Roth, B.A., Fromm, M.E., Cone, K.C., Radicella, J.P., and Chandler, V.L. (1 990). Transactivation of anthocyanin biosynthetic genes following transfer of B regulatory genes into maize tissues. EM60 J. 9, 2517-2522.

Goodrich, J., Carpenter, R., and Coen, E.S. (1992). A common gene regulates pigmentation pattern in diverse plant species. Cell

Grafi, G., Bumett, R.J., Helentjaris, T., Larkins, E.A., DeCaprio, J.A., Sellers, W.R., and Kaelin, W.G., Jr. (1996). A maize cDNA encoding

68,955-964.

161 8 The Plant Cell

a member of the retinoblastoma protein family: lnvolvement in endoreduplication. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93,89624967.

Ito, H., Fukuda, Y., Murata, K., and Kimura, A. (1983). Transforma- tion of intact yeast cells treated with alkali cations. J. Bacteriol.

Jaskulski, D., Gatti, C., Travali, S., Calabretta, B., and Baserga, R. (1988). Regulation of the proliferating cell nuclear antigen cyclin and thymidine kinase mRNA levels by growth factors. J. Biol. Chem. 263,10175-10179.

Jordan, K.L., Haas, AR., Logan, T.J., and Hall, D.J. (1994). Detailed analysis of the basic domain of the E2F1 transcription factor indicates that it is unique among bHLH proteins. Oncogene

Karlseder, J., Rotheneder, H., and Wintersberger, E. (1 996). Inter- action of Spl with the growth- and cell cycle-regulated transcrip- tion factor E2F. MOI. Cell. Biol. 16, 1659-1667.

Kirk, M.M., and Kirk, D.L. (1985). Translational regulation of protein synthesis in response to light, at a critical stage of Volvox devel- opment. Cell41,419-428.

Kosugi, S., Suzuka, I., Ohashi, Y., Murakami, T., and Arai, Y. (1 991). Upstream sequences of rice proliferating cell nuclear anti- gen (PCNA) gene mediate expression of PCNA-GUS chimeric gene in meristems of transgenic tobacco plants. Nucleic Acids Res. 19,1571-1576.

Kosugi, S., Suzuka, I., and Ohashi, Y. (1995). Two of three pro- moter elements identified in a rice gene for proliferating cell nuclear antigen are essential for meristematic tissue-specific expression. Plant J. 7, 877-886.

Li, J.J., and Herskowitz, 1. (1993). lsolation of ORC6, a component of the yeast origin recognition complex by a one-hybrid system. Science 262,1870-1874.

Lin, S.Y., Black, AS., Kostic, D., Pajovic, S., Hoover, C.N., and Azizkhan, J.C. (1 996). Cell cycle-regulated association of E2F1 and Spl is related to their functional interaction. MOI. Cell. Biol. 16,16684675.

153,163-168.

9,1177-1 185.

Lowndes, N.F., Johnson, A.L., Breeden, L., and Johnston, L.H. (1992a). SW16 protein is required for transcription of the periodi- cally expressed DNA synthesis genes in budding yeast. Nature 357,505-508.

Lowndes, N.F., Mclnerny, C.J., Johnson, A.L., Fantes, P.A., and Johnston, L.H. (1992b). Control of DNA synthesis genes in fission yeast by the cell-cycle gene cdclO+. Nature 355, 449-453.

Ludwig, S.R., and Wessler, S.R. (1 990). Maize R gene family: Tis- sue-specific helix-loop-helix proteins. Cell62,849-851.

Matsumoto, K., Moriuchi, T., Koji, T., and Nakane, P.-K. (1987). Molecular cloning of cDNA coding for rat proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA)/cyclin. EMBO J. 6,637-642.

Matsumoto, T., Hata, S., Suzuka, I., and Hashimoto, J. (1994). Expression of functional proliferating-cell nuclear antigen from rice (Oryza sativa) in Escherichia coli in association with human DNA polymerase 6. Eur. J. Biochem. 223, 179-1 87.

Mudryj, M., Hiebert, S.W., and Nevins, J.R. (1990). A role for the adenovirus inducible E2F transcription factor in a proliferation dependent signal transduction pathway. EMBO J. 9,2179-2184.

Nagar, S., Pedersen, T.J., Carrick, K.M., Hanley-Bowdoin, L., and Robertson, D. (1995). A geminivirus induces expression of a host DNA synthesis protein in terminally differentiated plant cells. Plant Cell 7, 705-71 9.

Ogris, E., Rotheneder, H., Mudrak, I., Pichler, A., and Wintersberger, E. (1 993). A binding site for transcription factor E2F is a target for transactivation of murine thymidine kinase by polyomavirus large T antigen and plays an important role in growth regulation of the gene. J. Virol. 67, 1765-1 771.

Prelich, G., Kotsura, M., Marshak, D.R., Mathews, M.B., and Stillman, B. (1 987a). The cell cycle-regulated proliferating cell nuclear antigen is required for SV40 DNA replication in vitro. Nature 326,471-475.

Prelich, G., Tan, C.-K., Kotsura, M., Mathews, M.B., So, A.G., Downey, K., and Stillman, B. (1987b). Functional identity of pro- liferating cell nuclear antigen and a DNA polymerase 6 auxiliary protein. Nature 326,517-520.

Rose, M.D., Winston, F., and Hieter, P. (1990). Methods in Yeast Genetics: A Laboratory Course Manual. (Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press).

Roth, B.A., Goff, S.A., Klein, T.M., and Fromm, M.E. (1991). C7- and R-dependent expression of the maize 6z7 gene requires sequences with homology to mammalian myb and myc binding sites. Plant Cell3,317-325.

Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E.F., and Maniatis, T. (1989). Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual. (Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press).

Shirodkar, S., Ewen, M., DeCaprio, J.A., Morgan, J., Livingston, D.M., and Chittenden, T. (1992). The transcription factor E2F interacts with the retinoblastoma product and a pl07-cyclin A complex in a cell cycle-regulated manner. Cell68, 157-166.

Shivji, M.K.K., Kenny, M.K., and Wood, R.D. (1992). Proliferating cell nuclear antigen is required for DNA excision repair. Cell 69,

Slansky, J.E., and Farnham, P.J. (1996). Transcriptional regulation of the dihydrofolate reductase gene. Bioessays 18, 55-62.

Soni, R., Carmichael, J.P., Shah, Z.H., and Murray, J.A.H. (1995). A family of cyclin D homologs from plants differentially controlled by growth regulators and containing the conserved retinoblas- toma protein interaction motif. Plant Cell 7,85103.

Suzuka, I., Hata, S., Matsuoka, M., Kosugi, S., and Hashimoto, J. (1 991). Highly conserved structure of proliferating cell nuclear antigen (DNA polymerase 6 auxiliary protein) gene in plants. Eur. J. Biochem. 195,571-575.

Tommasi, S., and Pfeifer, G.P. (1995). In vivo structure of the human cdc2 promoter: Release of a p130-E2F-4 complex from sequences immediately upstream of the transcription initiation site coincides with induction of cdc2 expression. MOI. Cell. Biol. 15,6901-6913.

Toschi, L., and Bravo, R. (1988). Changes in cyclin/proliferating cell nuclear antigen distribution during DNA repair synthesis. J. Gell Biol. 107, 1623-1628.

Waga, S., Hannon, G.J., Beach, B., and Stillman, B. (1994). The p21 inhibitor of cyclin-dependent kinases controls DNA replica- tion by interaction with PCNA. Nature 369, 574-578.

367-374.

Cloning of PCF1 and PCF2 cDNA 161 9

Wang, M.M., and Reed, R.R. (1993). Molecular cloning of the olfac- tory neuronal transcription factor Olf-1 by genetic selection in yeast. Nature 364,121-126.

Xie, Q., Suarez-Lopez, P., and Gutierrez, C. (1995). ldentification and analysis of a retinoblastoma binding motif in the replication protein of a plant DNA virus: Requirement for efficient vira1 DNA replication. EMBO J. 14,4073-4082.

Xie, Q., Sanz-Burgos, A.P., Hannon, G.J., and Gutierrez, C. (1996). Plant cells contain a nove1 member of the retinoblastoma family of growth regulatory proteins. EMBO J. 15, 4900-4908.

Yocum, R., Hanley, S., West, R., Jr., and Ptashne, M. (1984). Use of lacZ fusions to delimit regulatory elements of inducible diver- gent GAL7-GAL 70 promoter in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. MOI. Cell. Biol. 4,1985-1998.