patterns of regional mortality in ukraine from soviet...

18
PATTERNS OF REGIONAL MORTALITY IN UKRAINE FROM SOVIET TIME TO NOWADAYS Svitlana PONIAKINA XXVII IUSSP International Population Conference 2631 August 2013, Busan, Korea

Upload: others

Post on 19-Feb-2021

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • PATTERNS OF REGIONAL MORTALITY IN UKRAINE FROM SOVIET TIME TO NOWADAYS

    Svitlana PONIAKINA

    XXVII IUSSP International Population Conference26‐31 August 2013, Busan, Korea

  • 2

    The special interest in Ukraine

    Difference in Life Expectancy among regions is large (≈5 years)

    max

    81.079.9

    68.676.2

    min

    82.1

    max

    69.368.6

    66.967.1

    min

    71.7Crisis following the collapseof Soviet Union made causedchanges in mortality patterns

    Life expectancy at birth in Europe and Ukraine, 2005‐2010

  • Research questions:

    3

    1. How large are geographical variations in mortality in Ukraine?  

    2. How have they changed over time?

    3. What are causes of death behind variations ?

  • Data 

    4

    Data of State Statistics Office of Ukraine:26 administrative units:

    • 24 regions (oblasts)• Autonomous Republic of Crimea • Capital Kyiv 

    1988

    1989

    1990

    1991

    1992

    1993

    1994

    1995

    1996

    1997

    1998

    1999

    2000

    2001

    2002

    2003

    2004

    2005

    2006

    2007

    2008

    2009

    2010

    Population by age (rn2)    Death by age and by cause (C8)

    census census

  • Method:

    5

    stx

    xjxj pmSDR ,

    ynynyn

    cyncyncyn MM

    MM

    21

    2,

    1,

    ,

    Standardized Death Rates:Decomposition of change in life expectancy 

    by causes of death

    ‐ death rate at age x for a region j

    stxp ‐ proportion of the population at 

    age x in standard population

    jxm ,

    cynM ,

    yn M

    cyc

    nyn , ‐ contribution produced by the difference in mortality in the age group y, y+n

    y

    W

    xynxx ee

    12

    ‐ difference in life expectancy in 2 periods

    ‐ central death rate for age group y, y+n and cause of death c

    ‐ central death rate for age group y,y+n and all causes

  • Three time periods at a focus:1) around census of 1989 – last census in Soviet Union2) around census of 2001 – first all‐Ukraine’s census3) latest years  – nowadays

    Census 1989, begin of the year

    Census 2001, end of the year Nowadays

    Soviet Union

    1988 19901989

    economic crisis

    2000 2001 2002 2003 2007 2008 2009 2010

    I n d e p e n d e n c e

    1991

  • females

    I.degradation II. 

    crisis

    III.recovery

    males

    60

    62

    64

    66

    68

    70

    72

    74

    76

    1988

    1989

    1990

    1991

    1992

    1993

    1994

    1995

    1996

    1997

    1998

    1999

    2000

    2001

    2002

    2003

    2004

    2005

    2006

    2007

    2008

    2009

    2010

    Life expectany

     at b

    irth in years

    years

    62.063.4

    74.673.5

    74.4

    65.5

    Life expectancy at birth, 1988‐2010

    After two decades LE returned to its initial values observed at the end of Soviet epoch.

    What happened during this period with mortality patterns?

  • I. Life expectancy at birth by regions: males

    1988‐1991: LE – 65.5 yearmax‐min = 4.4 year

    2007‐2010: LE – 64.3 yearmax‐min = 6.5 year

    2000‐2003: LE‐ 62 yearsmax‐min = 6.3 year

    South and North (around Chernobyl) have lost the most in LE.South and West have contributed the most to its recovery.

    >66.9

  • I. Life expectancy from past till now: females

    1988‐1992: LE – 74.6 yearmax‐min = 2.9 year

    2008‐2012: LE – 74.4 yearmax‐min = 4.6 year

    2000‐2003: LE – 73.5 yearmax‐min = 4.1 year

    >76.5

  • Mix type:• High share of chronic conditions and of

    “man‐made” diseases• Communicable diseases are still

    important

    II. Nosological structure of mortality*: males1988‐1991 2000‐2003 2007‐2010

    49.4

    19.8

    13.7

    8.33.21.6

    53.6

    14.3

    15.6

    6.34.0 3.0

    56.8

    13.9

    12.3

    4.5

    5.7 3.5

    Circulatory systemCancersExternal causesRespiratory systemDigestive systemInfectious and parasitic diseases With course of time this contradiction only 

    strengthened

    *According to standardized death rates based on all‐Ukraine’s population of 2001 used as a standard

  • II. Nosological structure of mortality: females1988‐1991 2000‐2003 2007‐2010

    Circulatory systemCancersExternal causesRespiratory systemDigestive systemInfectious and parasitic diseases

    Circulatory system diseases are crucially important in surviving of females, 

    and their role is increasing

    71.1

    13.3

    3.75.1 2.1 0.4

    76.1

    11.3

    4.3 2.82.2 0.6

    76.5

    11.5

    3.31.8 3.2 1.1

    *According to standardized death rates based on all‐Ukraine’s population of 2001 used as a standard

  • 12

    ‐1,8

    ‐1,3

    ‐0,8

    ‐0,3

    0,2

    circulatory system

    external cau

    ses

    cancers

    respira

    tory system

    digestive system

    infectious diseases

    othe

    r cau

    ses

    contrib

    ution in years

    males females

    Increased mortality from circulatory system diseases, external causes and infectious diseases 

    have the most contributed to the decline of life expectancy 

    III. Contribution to difference in LE by causes: 2000‐2003 comparing to 1988‐1991 (degradation)

  • 13

    Decreased mortality from Circulatory system diseases (for females) 

    andExternal causes (for males) 

    have the most contributed to the recovery of  LE

    Digestive system diseases Infectious diseases

    constantly contribute to deterioration in LE‐0,4

    ‐0,2

    0,0

    0,2

    0,4

    0,6

    0,8

    1,0

    1,2circulatory system

    external cau

    ses

    cancers

    respira

    tory sy

    stem

    digestive system

    infectious diseases

    othe

    r cau

    ses

    contrib

    ution in years

    males

    females

    III. Contribution to difference in LE by causes: 2007‐2010 comparing to 2000‐2003 (recovery)

  • 14

    ‐45

    ‐35

    ‐25

    ‐15

    ‐5

    5

    15

    25

    circulatory system

    external cau

    ses

    cancers

    respira

    tory sy

    stem

    digestive system

    infectious diseases

    othe

    r cau

    ses

    ZAKARPATSKALVIVSKAVOLYNSKARIVNENSKATERNOPILSKAIVANO‐FRANKIVSKACHERNIVETSKAKHMELNYTSKAZHYTOMYRSKAVINNYTSKAKYIVSKACHERNIHIVSKACHERKASKASUMSKAKIROVOHRADSKAPOLTAVSKAKHARKIVSKAODESKAMYKOLAYIVSKADNIPROPETROVKAKHERSONSKAZAPORIZKADONETSKALUHANSKAARCRIMEAKYIV

    III. Contribution to difference in LE by causes: males(two periods together)

    2000‐2003 comparing to 1988‐1991 

    • Only external causes covered back loses in LE (eastern regions concerned)• Circulatory system diseases – only partly• Digestive system diseases continue to generate loses • Cancers and respiratory system disease continue to generate gains (western regions concerned)

    West

    North‐Center

    South‐East

    2007‐2010 comparing to 2000‐2003 

  • 15

    III. Contribution to difference in LE by causes: females(two periods together)

    2000‐2003 comparing to 1988‐1991 

    • Circulatory system diseases external causes covered back loses in LE (eastern regions concerned)• Digestive system and infectious diseases continue to generate loses • Cancers and respiratory system disease continue to generate gains (western regions concerned)• Other causes contributed to gains

    ‐45

    ‐35

    ‐25

    ‐15

    ‐5

    5

    15

    25

    circulatory system

    external cau

    ses

    cancers

    respira

    tory sy

    stem

    digestive system

    infectious diseases

    othe

    r cau

    ses

    ZAKARPATSKALVIVSKAVOLYNSKARIVNENSKATERNOPILSKAIVANO‐FRANKIVSKACHERNIVETSKAKHMELNYTSKAZHYTOMYRSKAVINNYTSKAKYIVSKACHERNIHIVSKACHERKASKASUMSKAKIROVOHRADSKAPOLTAVSKAKHARKIVSKAODESKAMYKOLAYIVSKADNIPROPETROVKAKHERSONSKAZAPORIZKADONETSKALUHANSKAARCRIMEAKYIV

    2007‐2010 comparing to 2000‐2003 

    West

    North‐Center

    South‐East

  • 16

    IV. Contribution to difference in LE by causes and regions:Circulatory system diseases: males

    1.5min ‐0.5 0 0.5‐1.5 max

    • East and North are responsible for major losses though situation on the East have recovered, West and North still contribute to decrease in LE

    2000‐2003 comparing to 1988‐1991  2007‐2010 comparing to 2000‐2003 

  • 17

    1.5min ‐0.5 0 0.5‐1.5 max

    IV. Contribution to difference in LE by causes and regions:Circulatory system diseases: females

    • Degradation was about the same over entire Ukraine• Improvement is particular for the South and West

    2000‐2003 comparing to 1988‐1991  2007‐2010 comparing to 2000‐2003 

  • Conclusions:

    18

    • During two decades life expectancy in Ukraine experienced sharpdecrease, then stagnation followed by a recovery.

    • Though average values at the end of Soviet times and now are close,regional and cause‐specific patterns changed.

    • The biggest killer, pathologies of circulatory system, contributed a lotto the losses in life expectancy and their role is still cruciallyimportant even after a recovery

    • As for geography mortality improved more in the regions wheresituation was already favorable (West), and degraded where it wasalready difficult (East‐South) bringing western regions to the secondstage of a health transition.