participatory ecological restoration in the rio blanco watershed: ecosystem based adaptation actions...

26
PARTICIPATORY ECOLOGICAL RESTORATION IN THE RIO BLANCO WATERSHED: ECOSYSTEM BASED ADAPTATION ACTIONS TO ADDRESS CLIMATE CHANGE IMPACTS IN THE CHINGAZA MASSIF, HIGH MOUNTAIN ECOSYSTEMS OF COLOMBIA Angela Andrade, Klaus Schutze y Angélica Cardona

Upload: gpflr

Post on 11-Apr-2017

1.576 views

Category:

Education


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

PARTICIPATORY ECOLOGICAL RESTORATION IN THE RIO BLANCO WATERSHED: ECOSYSTEM BASED ADAPTATION ACTIONS TO ADDRESS CLIMATE CHANGE IMPACTS IN THE

CHINGAZA MASSIF, HIGH MOUNTAIN ECOSYSTEMS OF COLOMBIA

Angela Andrade, Klaus Schutze y Angélica Cardona

Presenter
Presentation Notes
We are presenting today the results of the Integrated National Adaptation PILOT, INAP, implemented in the high mountain ecosystems of Colombia. It is the first GEF project on Adaptation.

Context

High Mountain Ecosystems and Vulnerability to Climate Change

Located over 2740msnm. 3.7% (4.210.000ha). 70% of National population depend on ES. 48% are protected areas. Glaciers tend to disappear in the coming 10 years. Current Andean forest cover: 23% “Paramos and High Andean Forestry's are highly

vulnerable to cc, affecting provision of ecosystem services. (2nd NC. 2010).

Presenter
Presentation Notes
According with the 1st National Communication to the CC Convention, High Mountain Ecosystems are highly vulnerable to the impacts of Climate Change, especially because most of the population living in the Colombian Andes depend on the ES provided by them and there is a clear trend on temperature increase, changes in reainfall and extreme events.

Pilot Adaptation Project in High Mountain Ecosystems

a) What is the current and projected climate variability at regional scale and how can we best deal with the uncertainties of climate change trends?

b) What are the effects of climatic variability in high mountain ecosystems (Glaciers, High Andean Forests and Páramos)?

c) How can we best maintain or increase the resilience of high mountain ecosystems (Glaciers, High Andean Forests and Páramos) in a context of climate change and climate vulnerability?

d) How can we best prepare social actors for managing resilience and proactively adapt to global change and climate vulnerability in high mountain ecosystems?

e) How can we best influence public policies that focus on implementing environmental management processes?

Belongs to the Chingaza Massif (2nd largest

Paramo in Colombia, and the Chingaza National Park.

It is located 70 km from Bogota, covering an

area of 40.528 ha (30% of the Massif).

Provides water to a population of 8 million. It is used by the Water and Sewage Company in Bogotá.

Population: 15.000 inhabitants.

1 National Park; 3 Regional Environmental Authorities; 3 municipalities, 1Department.

STUDY AREA RIO BLANCO WATERSHED

Presenter
Presentation Notes
The study area is located in the 2nd largest paramo of Colombia, and it provides almost 80% of the water consumed in Bogotá.

Average rainfall decrease for the period

2071-2100 between 10 and 30%, for both A2 and B2 scenarios.

Temperature increase: 2-4° for the period

2071–2100 in both CC scenarios. 0

500.000

1.000.000

1.500.000

2.000.000

2.500.000

3.000.000

3.500.000

4.000.000

4.500.000

Más lluvioso a loactual

Similar a lo actual Seco encomparación a lo

actual

Muy seco encomparación a lo

actual

+10 - +30 -10 - +10 -30 - -10 < -30

Escenario A2Escenario B2

0

500.000

1.000.000

1.500.000

2.000.000

2.500.000

3.000.000

3.500.000

Ligeramente más calidoque lo actual

Más calido que loactual

Muy calido que loactual

0-2 2-4 > 4

Escenario A2Escenario B2

Projected Climate trends in the area

Rainfall 2071–2100

Temperature 2071–2100

Presenter
Presentation Notes
The project developed Climate Change scenarios at national and local level to understand climate variability and main trends of climate change.

How can we build resilience?

1. Vulnerability Assessment Models:

Territorial Sensibility

Slope Land Cover Change Climatic disruptions Fragmentation Index Ecological Integrity Index.

Threats

Climate Change Landslides Increase in the agricultural frontier Mining Infrastructure

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Vulnerability assessments were carried out, including social and ecological aspects affecting the study area. Climate Change was one of these threats. These aspects were analysed at territorial level.

Tipo cambio Área (ha) %

Pérdida bosques 2.512 27

Pérdida espacios naturales naturales 2.554 27

Ganancia bosques 2.696 28

Ganancia espacios naturales 900 10

Estable 799 8

Total cambios 9.461 100

Land Use Change map 1950- 2010

Presenter
Presentation Notes
First of all, a Land use map was developed, based on land use changes during the last 60 years.

Land Cover Threats

Increase of Agricultural Frontier

Mass Movements

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Land cover threats were mapped and an integrated vulnerability assessment was carried out.

Forest fires. Mining

Infrastructure Climate Change

Integrated Vulnerability Assessment of Río Blanco Watershed

2. Participative Analysis of Securities and ecosystem services: water, food, territory.

SUPPORTING -C02 fixation: 70% soil and 30% biomass.

-Soil formation -Biodiversity -Nutrient Cycle

PROVISIONING -Food -Medicines -Fuel -Wood and Fiber -Freshwater

CULTURAL

Aesthetic

Religious.

Recreation and tourism.

Cultural Heritage

3. Surveys with key stakeholders at farm level: interviews and local visits.

REGULATING

-Water regulation.

-Erosion control.

-Quantity and Quality of Water.

-Natural Risks Reduction.

-Water holding capacity.

-Groundwater recharge.

Presenter
Presentation Notes
The results of this analysis was discussed with key stakeholders and local communities, and a participative analyisis of the most relevant ecosystem services was carried out, indicating that water, food and the territory were the main concerns of local people.

4. Participative Ecological Restoration, as an Adaptation Measure to address climate change impacts.

Social Aspects Improve living Conditions Community participation to implement restoration actions. Restoration agreements .

Economic Aspects Ecosystem Services

Selection of sites for restoration, to guarantee provision of water and water regulation.

Ecological Aspects Ecosystem Structure

and Function

Selection of priority species for propagation. Reduction of ecological stressors.

Ecological and Social Resilience

Presenter
Presentation Notes
In order to address these vulonerabilities, ecological restoration (seen in an integrated way) was implemented. Restoration in this context, is the best way to build ecological and social resilience.

A geographical network of spaces that support essential ecological processes necessary to guide adaptation beyond biodiversity conservation and towards the maintenance of ecosystem structure and functioning and main ecosystem services. Main Objective: Maintenance, recovery and regulation of water resources and connect people with their territory. a) Land use recommendations in the framework of ecosystem functioning thresholds; b) Key elements to promote natural connectivity, including ecological restoration. c) Information gaps that need to be addressed to contribute to ecosystem resilience. d) Promotion of social organization mechanisms. e) Proposed compensatory mechanisms.

a. Definition of the Ecological Adaptive Structure- EETA

Presenter
Presentation Notes
The first step was to link ecological restoration with local land use planning, at municipality level (which is the lowest planning level). The main objectives were the conservation and maintenance of water resources and connecting people with their territory.

Ecological Adaptive Structure- EETA

Conservation

Transition and Productive

Areas

Riversides, Wetlands and Catchments

Areas which have to be protected, rich in biodiversity and contribute maintaining hydrological regulation.

Riversides : 7-30m; Catchment areas:10-100m.

Land use changes: grazing to agroforestry systems

Secondary forests; Natural regeneration.

Presenter
Presentation Notes
The ecological adaptive structure proposed 3 categories: Conservation (Paramos, closed forest areas). Connectivity (catchment areas, riversides…). Production and transition areas: changes at farm level in order to guarantee connectivity, water production and food security.

b. Building an Ecological Restoration Plan.

Catchment areas, wetlands and riversides.

Geodynamic process: landslides, severe erosion.

Land use conflicts/ land degradation. Forest fires. Degraded land of PNN Chingaza and

Forest Reserve of Río Blanco and Negro.

Potential area to be restored: 48%

Presenter
Presentation Notes
A restoration plan was developed based on the vulonerability assessment.

c. Promoting Participative Ecological Restoration Actions

- Community participation . Development of “Adaptive land use Plans”, at local level for the management of “global commons”: local agreements for building ecological and social resilience, including activities such as watershed management, land restoration, farm planning, ecological monitoring and social networking;

Identification and implementation of restoration actions which require collective work

“mingas” .

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Community participation was considered at local level, and by initiative of the local communities, adaptive land use plans were implemented, including commitments in restoration, farm planning and monitoring, and collective work.

- Selection of sites for the implementation of ecological restoration actions in priority areas: Current land cover/land use and soil status. Water quantity/quality, and current use. Stakeholders and communities depending on water services.

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Sites were seceted considering ecological and social aspects, in agreement with the local communities.

- Community Agreements for Ecological Restoration.

Agreements for the definition of restoration areas. Signature of Commitment Acts for the implementation

of Restoration Actions. Delivery of inputs for the implementation of actions.

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Agreements for the selection of restoration sites were signed.

- Propagation of plant species for restoration in priority areas.

Identification of species: pioneer species; early growing

species; and others that help natural succession, including those identified by local knowledge.

Collection, propagation and maintenance of the species. Advice to communities in local villages. Construction of satellite greenhouses and an experimental

center to promote participatory research, capacity building and training of local communities and research.

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Propagation of plant species, including species which have economic value, was implemented. An importan activity was the construction of an experimental center to promote participatory research and recognition of traditional knowledge. This center was built at the scholl in order to link research and restoration.

PROPIETARIO SITIO PREDIO ALTURA (msnm) COORDENADAS DESCRIPCIÓN EVALUACIÓN FINAL

- Reduction of tensors and planting native species in selected areas.

Implementation of isolation actions. Communitarian actions for planting. Building drinking places and establishment of pastures for livestock outside

isolated areas.

José Ever Cifuentes R La Esperanza 2.536 Lat. 04° 39’ 04.3” N Lon. 073° 52’ 46.0” W

Sin vegetación arbórea. Abastece de agua a varias familias de la vereda de La Jangada.

Se realizó el aislamiento, se sembraron los árboles y se instaló el bebedero. Se utilizaron todos los insumos entregados.

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Some examples of restoration at field level.

Ejemplo de los sitios caracterizados en la vereda Chatasugá, para la implementación del proceso de restauración ecológica.

Pedro Ángel Barreto

Sitio de ronda hídrica, en la quebrada La Carbonera, desprovisto de vegetación arbórea circundante. Se acuerda con el propietario un aislamiento de 100 metros de perímetro para la protección de este sitio.

Pedro Ángel Barreto

Nacedero desprovisto de vegetación arbórea circundante, con suelo expuesto; conecta con parche de vegetación relictual. Se acuerda con el propietario un aislamiento de 43 metros de perímetro para la protección de este sitio.

Mercedes Pulido

Nacedero desprovisto de vegetación arbórea circundante e invadido por pastos y especies herbáceas. Se acuerda con el propietario un aislamiento de 20 metros de perímetro para la protección de este sitio.

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Examples for connectivity and transitional areas.

Example of Restoration at Farm Level.

Alternatives to Grazing Systems: Confined cattle Multispecies fences Sylvopastoral systems Improved pastures Forage Banks

Results

1. Restoration actions implemented in 9 local communities, restoration agreements signed (6.440 planted trees, of 50 native species).

2. 204 ecological restoration process implemented. 3. Silvopastoral and agroforestry systems established in 121 farms. 4. 8 homegardens in different localities, to promote propagation of native

species and production of organic fertilizer. 5. 1 main center for propagation, producing high quality plants for distribution

among local communities. 6. Capacity building of local communities: restoration, agro forestry systems,

efficient use of water. (Benefiting 800 families). 7. 2 Land Use plans including restoration in order to reduce territorial

vulnerability. 8. 9 adaptive land use plans at local level for the management of “global

commons”. 9. Restoration actions included in education processes and cultural activities. 10.C/B analysis, indicating the avoided cost in water services, after 7 years of

implementing restoration in catchment areas. (2.000US/catchment site/yr).

Lessons Learned Building resilience during Restoration

An integrated vulnerability assessment is the first step to address the

impacts of climate change through restoration. Vulnerability increases with non sustainable management practices. Restoration of ecosystem services is an ecosystem based adaptation (EbA)

measure to climate change and build resilience. EbA through restoration is a learning by doing process. Restoration is a matter of social and economic development. The success of pilot adaptation projects using restoration, is a learning by

doing process and depends on the participation of local communities and the recognition of traditional knowledge.

Valuation of restoration has to be improved, including social, ecological and cultural costs.

Impact on public policies and planning is relevant (land use/farm). Institutions have to be strengthened and adapted in order to improve

resilience.