part a - personal pedagogical framework - oral presentation - b anstey
DESCRIPTION
EDP3333 - Pedagogy and Curriculum 3 Part A Personal Pedagogical Framework Oral presentation Belinda Anstey Student number: 0061018708TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Part A - Personal Pedagogical Framework - Oral presentation - B Anstey](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081412/5452b911af795907798b945b/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
PERSONAL PEDAGOGICAL FRAMEWORK ORAL PRESENTATIONEDP3333 Curriculum and Pedagogy 3
Belinda Anstey
![Page 2: Part A - Personal Pedagogical Framework - Oral presentation - B Anstey](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081412/5452b911af795907798b945b/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Some definitions of Learning (Curry, 1993)
A change in behaviour as a result of experience or practice.
The process of gaining knowledge.
A process by which behaviour is changed, shaped or controlled.
The individual process of constructing understanding based on experiences learning.
Fig 1: Displays some definitions of learning.
Fig 1: Shows Contemporary Learning Theory. Source: Studydesk.
“Learning is defined by the person defining it” (Mezirow, 2000)
![Page 3: Part A - Personal Pedagogical Framework - Oral presentation - B Anstey](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081412/5452b911af795907798b945b/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Behaviorism and Constructivism
Figure 4: Shows how Behaviourism and Constructivism are opposite.
![Page 4: Part A - Personal Pedagogical Framework - Oral presentation - B Anstey](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081412/5452b911af795907798b945b/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Constructivism and Theory
“Constructivist learning is a student driven process in which learners develop, or construct, their understanding of
information as they work with concepts and think about processes” (Richardson, 1997).
Figure 5: Demonstrates the process in which knowledge is constructed. Adapted from Strategies and Model for Teachers (Eggan and Kauchak, 2006).
Piaget (1976) acknowledges that children are active
learners that construct knowledge from their
environment.
Figure 6: Jean Piaget. Source: NNBD
![Page 5: Part A - Personal Pedagogical Framework - Oral presentation - B Anstey](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081412/5452b911af795907798b945b/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Behaviorism and Theory
Activity
Arrival (rules, set expectations for day)
(Teacher Directed)
Reading groups (Teacher and student Directed)
English (Teacher Directed )
Little lunch
Maths (Teacher Directed thenChild Directed)
Music N/A
Lunch
Science (Child Directed)
Figure 7: Demonstrates a routine timetable that my personal pedagogical framework would include. Adapted from
Figure 8: B.F. Skinner. Source: NAP. edu
![Page 6: Part A - Personal Pedagogical Framework - Oral presentation - B Anstey](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081412/5452b911af795907798b945b/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Teaching Strategy – K.W.L CHART
What I Know (Facts) What I Want to know (questions)
What I have Learnt
Figure 9: Adapted from Reflections on classroom thinking (Frangenheim, 2010)
Frangenheim (2010) states ,“That this strategy enables students to activate background knowledge, create new
questions and develop a purpose for the task”.
![Page 7: Part A - Personal Pedagogical Framework - Oral presentation - B Anstey](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081412/5452b911af795907798b945b/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Teaching Strategy - Round Robin
Sheurrman (1998) states that, “The
major benefit is that whereas in a whole group brainstorm only one person is
responding, in Round Robin, every student
is on task at all times”.
Figure 10: Demonstrates the structure of Round Robin.
![Page 8: Part A - Personal Pedagogical Framework - Oral presentation - B Anstey](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081412/5452b911af795907798b945b/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
HOW CAN LEARNERS JUDGE THE ACCURACY OF THEIR
UNDERSTANDINGS? (OLSEN, 2003).
![Page 9: Part A - Personal Pedagogical Framework - Oral presentation - B Anstey](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081412/5452b911af795907798b945b/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Explicit Teaching – I DO, WE DO, YOU DO
I DO (Demonstrati
on/Model)
WE DO (Guided Practice)
YOU DO (Application)
Teacher behaviour
Student behaviour
Thinks aloud Listen
Models Observe
Teacher behaviour
Student behaviour
Suggests Listens
Explains Interacts
Responds Collaborates
Acknowledges Participate
Teacher behaviour
Student behaviour
Assist as needed Apply learning
Responds Problem solve
Evaluates student learning
Self monitor
![Page 10: Part A - Personal Pedagogical Framework - Oral presentation - B Anstey](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081412/5452b911af795907798b945b/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Explicit Teaching enables and limits my pedagogical practice
![Page 11: Part A - Personal Pedagogical Framework - Oral presentation - B Anstey](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081412/5452b911af795907798b945b/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
References
Ashman, A. F., & Conway, R. N. F. (1997). An introduction to cognitive education: Theory and applications. London: Routledge.
Borich, G. (2013). Effective Teaching Methods: Research-Based Practice. London: Pearson Education.
Bringuier, J., & Piaget, J. (1989). Conversations with Jean Piaget. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Curry, L. (1993). An Organization of Learning Styles Theory and Constructs. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Retrieved 15 th October, 2013 from http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED235185.
Devries, R. (1999). Implications of Piaget's Constructivist Theory for Character Education. The Journal of the Association of Teacher Educators. 20 (4). 39-47. doi:10.1080/01626620.1999.10462933.
Dillfay, D., & Sassman, C. (2007). Teaching Effective Classroom Routines: Establish Structure in the Classroom to Foster Children's Learning-From the First Day of School and All Through the Year. New York: Scholastic Teaching Resources.
Fosnot, C. (2005). Constructivism: Theory, Perspectives And Practice. Columbia: Teachers College Press. Frangenheim E. (2010) Reflections on classroom thinking strategies (9th Ed) Loganholme QLD: ITC Publications.
McGregor, D. (2007). Developing Thinking; Developing Learning. New York: McGraw- Hill International.
Mezirow, K. (2000). Learning as Transformation: Critical Perspectives on a Theory in Progress. New York: ERIC.
Olson, D.(2003). Psychological theory and educational reform: how school remakes mind and society. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Richardson, V. (1997). Constructivist Teacher Education: Building a World of New Understandings. New York: Routledge.
Scheurman, G. (1998). From Behaviourist to Constructivist Teaching. Journal of Social Education. 62 (1). 6-9. Retrieved 11th October, 2013 from http://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ565801.
Skinner, B. F. (1968). The Technology of Teaching. New York: Meredith Corporation.
Strong, W. (2001). Coaching writing: the power of guided practice. California, U.S.A: Heinemann Publishers.
ImagesSkinner, B. F. [Image]. 2013. Retrieved from http://www.nndb.com/people/297/000022231/Contemporary Learning Theory [Image].2013. Retrieved from http://usqstudydesk.usq.edu.au/m2/course/view.php?id=2922Piaget, J. [Image]. 2011. Retrieved from http://www.nndb.com/people/359/000094077/