part 2b steady state 1-d conduction
TRANSCRIPT
8/19/2019 Part 2b Steady State 1-D Conduction
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/part-2b-steady-state-1-d-conduction 1/50
8/19/2019 Part 2b Steady State 1-D Conduction
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/part-2b-steady-state-1-d-conduction 2/50
University of Ottawa, CHG 2314, B. Kruczek 2
Conduction Analysis
• Selection of appropriate form of the heat equation
• Solve heat equation subject to appropriate initial and boundary conditions for thetemperature distribution
• Application ofFourier’s law
to determine the heat flux
Three main steps of conduction analysis
Simplest conduction case: (1) One-Dimensional , (2) Steady-State , (3) with or without Thermal Energy Generation
Common geometries
• The Plane Wall : Described in rectangular (x) coordinate. Area perpendicular todirection of heat transfer is constant (independent of x).
• The Tube Wall : Radial conduction through tube wall
• The Spherical Shell : Radial conduction through shell wall
8/19/2019 Part 2b Steady State 1-D Conduction
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/part-2b-steady-state-1-d-conduction 3/50
University of Ottawa, CHG 2314, B. Kruczek 3
Steady-state 1-D conduction – Plane wall
Temperature distribution• Heat Equation for 1-D plane wall having constant k at steady state
Solving governing differential equation byintegrating it twice:
2 2 2
2 2 2 pT T T T
k q ct x y z
where : C 1 and C 2 are the integration constants, determinatio
nof which require specifying two boundary conditions
Boundary conditions: ,1 ,20 , s sT T T L T
1 2T x C x C
Substituting expressions for constants: ,2 ,1
,1 s s
sT T
T x T L
2
12 0
d T dT dx C
dxdx 1
dT dx C dx
dx
,2 1 ,1 1 ,2 ,1 s s s sT C L T C T T L
,1 1 2 2 ,10 s sT C C C T
2
20
d T
dx
8/19/2019 Part 2b Steady State 1-D Conduction
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/part-2b-steady-state-1-d-conduction 4/50
University of Ottawa, CHG 2314, B. Kruczek 4
Steady-state 1-D conduction – Plane wall
Temperature distribution• Heat Equation for 1-D plane wall at steady state variable k
Integrating once:
0d dT
k dx dx
Let : ok k aT
Qualitative determination of temperature profile
pT T T T
k k k q c x x y y z z t
"1 x
dT k C qdx or simply Fourier’s law is recovered:
where k o and a are constants. 1 2 1 20 , andT T T L T T T BCs :
Unlike the case with constant k , double integration of the governing differential equationdoes not lead to explicit relation T = f ( x ), but intuitively, T does not change linearly with x
For a > 0, k increases with T. Since q x ” is constant,dT / dx must decrease with
"
x
dT q k dx
For a < 0, k decreases with T. Since q x ” is constant,
dT / dx must increase with T For a = 0, k is independent of T. Since q x
” is constant,dT / dx must be independent of T
Q: How would the profiles in this problem change if T 1 < T 2?
0 L
8/19/2019 Part 2b Steady State 1-D Conduction
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/part-2b-steady-state-1-d-conduction 5/50
8/19/2019 Part 2b Steady State 1-D Conduction
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/part-2b-steady-state-1-d-conduction 6/50
University of Ottawa, CHG 2314, B. Kruczek 6
Steady-state 1-D conduction – Plane wall
Thermal circuit• Thermal resistance
Recall from Part 1 that rate equations for modes ofheat transfer can be written as:
We could get above equation, by realizing that all resistances are in series and knowingthe expressions for individual resistances
,1 ,2 ,1 ,2 ,1 ,2"" " " "
1 2 , 1 , , 21 1 xt conv t cond t conv t
T T T T T T q
h L k h R R R R
xt
T q
Rwhere : R t is the thermal resistance
", ,ort cond t cond
L LR RkA k
"
, ,
1 1 ort conv t conv
R R Ah h
Going back to equation for heat flux:
NB: Problem analysis may start from the equivalent thermal circuit , which in this case is:
8/19/2019 Part 2b Steady State 1-D Conduction
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/part-2b-steady-state-1-d-conduction 7/50University of Ottawa, CHG 2314, B. Kruczek 7
Steady-state 1-D conduction – Plane wall
Overall heat transfer coefficient U • Application of thermal circuit to a
multilayer plane wallRate equation for heat transfer fromhot to cold fluid:
,1 ,4x
tT T q
R
tottot
1 4
1 1 1
C A B
t A B C
L R L L R R
A h k k k h A
• Alternative expression for rate equation
,1 ,4
xt
T T q
R
,1 ,4x U q A T T
1
tot
U AR
A modified form of Newton’s law of cooling toencompass multiple resistances to heat transfer
Q: Assign k A, k B, k C from thelowest to the highest value?
8/19/2019 Part 2b Steady State 1-D Conduction
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/part-2b-steady-state-1-d-conduction 8/50University of Ottawa, CHG 2314, B. Kruczek 8
Steady-state 1-D conduction – Plane wall
Series and parallel resistances• Total resistance ( Rtot )
Resistances in series:
• Examples of parallel resistances
Simultaneous (parallel) convection and radiation from a surface at T s
Resistances in parallel:
tot A B
R R R
1
1 1 1 1 1tot
tot A B A BRR R R R R
If T sur = T : R”
rad
R”
conv
T T s
1"
1 1
1 1
sc r s
c r
T T q h h T T
h h
8/19/2019 Part 2b Steady State 1-D Conduction
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/part-2b-steady-state-1-d-conduction 9/50University of Ottawa, CHG 2314, B. Kruczek 9
Steady-state 1-D conduction – Plane wall
Series and parallel resistances• Examples of parallel resistances
Simultaneous (parallel) convection and radiation from a surface at T s
If T sur ≠ T :
4 4"
c s r s sur c s s sur q h T T h T T h T T T T
R”
rad
R”
conv T
T s
T sur
Composite wall made of 4 different materials E,F,G, H
NB: If k f k G the system is no longer one-dimensional,but it can be treated as a 1-D system by assuming:
a) Surfaces normal to the x -directionare isothermal:
b) Surfaces parallel to the x -direction
are adiabatic:
8/19/2019 Part 2b Steady State 1-D Conduction
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/part-2b-steady-state-1-d-conduction 10/50University of Ottawa, CHG 2314, B. Kruczek 10
Steady-state 1-D conduction – Plane wall
Contact resistance• Ideal and real interfaces
An ideal interface is formed between twoperfectly smooth solid surfaces A and B, sothat at the interface T A = T BIn reality, there is no perfectly smoothsurface, and at the interface T
A ≠ T
Bi.e.,
there is discontinuity in temperature profiledue to contact resistance
• Quantification of contact resistanceAll three modes of heat transfer may be involved in contact resistance
There is no thickness and hence no volume associated with contact resistanceIf temperatures of the surfaces in contact, T A and T B were know, the contactresistance could be evaluated from steady state heat flux :
,
A Btc
x
T T R
q t c
t cc
R R
A,
,
where : is the contact resistance per unitsurface area and is the contact resistance
2, m K/Wt c R , K/Wt c R
Numerical values of R” t,c are in the order of 10 -6 -10 -4 [m 2 K/W] - Table 3.2
" " " ", , ,tot cond A t c cond B R R R R
Q: In which cases the contact resistance will likely be a factor in heat transfer problems?
8/19/2019 Part 2b Steady State 1-D Conduction
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/part-2b-steady-state-1-d-conduction 11/50
University of Ottawa, CHG 2314, B. Kruczek 11
Example 1 – Problem 3.30
The performance of a gas turbine engines may be improved by increasing the tolerance of the turbineblades to hot gases emerging from the combustor. One approach to achieving high operation temperatureinvolves application of a thermal barrier coating (TBC) to the exterior surface of the blade, while passingcooling air through the blade. Typically, the blade is made from a high-temperature superalloy, such asInconel ( k = 25 W/m K), while a ceramic, such as zirconia ( k = 1.3 W/m K), is used as a TBC.
Consider conditions for which hot gases at T ,o = 1700 K and cooling air at T ,i = 400 K provide outer andinner surface coefficients of ho = 1000 W/m 2 K and h i = 500 W/m 2 K, respectively. If a 0.5 mm-thick zirconiaTBC is attached to a 5-mm-thick Inconel blade by means of a metallic bonding agent, which provides aninterfacial thermal resistance of R” t,c = 10 -4 m 2 K/W, can the Inconel be maintained at a temperature that isbelow the maximum allowable value of 1250 K? Radiation effect may be neglected, and the turbine blademay be approximated as a plane wall.
8/19/2019 Part 2b Steady State 1-D Conduction
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/part-2b-steady-state-1-d-conduction 12/50
University of Ottawa, CHG 2314, B. Kruczek 12
Steady-state 1-D conduction – Radialsystems
• Appropriate for of Heat Equation
Cylindrical wall Spherical wall
2
2
10
d dT kr
dr dr r
10
d dT kr
r dr dr
Boundary conditions(in both cases):
1 ,1 2 ,2, s sT r T T r T
• Temperature profiles (assuming constant k )Solving governing differential equations subject to boundary conditions:
,1 ,2,2
1 2 2ln
ln / s s
sT T r
T r T r r r
1/,1 ,1 ,2
1 2
1
1 / s s s
r r T r T T T
r r
8/19/2019 Part 2b Steady State 1-D Conduction
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/part-2b-steady-state-1-d-conduction 13/50
University of Ottawa, CHG 2314, B. Kruczek 13
Steady-state 1-D conduction – Radialsystems
• Heat flux and heat rate – application of Fourier’s law Cylindrical wall Spherical wall
• Conduction resistance, recognizing that : t q T R
,1 ,22 1ln /r s s
dT k q k T T
dr r r r
,1 ,22 1
22 ln /r r s s
Lk q rLq T T r r
,1 ,22 1
22
ln /r r s sk
q rq T T r r
A ( r )
[W/m 2]
[W/m]
[W]
[W/m 2]
[W]
,1 ,22
1 21/ 1/
r s s
dT k q k T T
dr r r r
2 ,1 ,21 2
441 / 1 /r r s sk q r q T T
r r
Q1: Why there is no q’ r for spherical wall?
A ( r )
2 1,cond
ln /
2t
r r R
Lk
2 1,cond
ln /
2t
r r R
k
[K/W]
[K m/W]
1 2,cond
1/ 1 /
4t
r r R
k
Q2: Why A doesn’t appear in the expressions for the thermal resistance?
Q3: What would be the expressions for the resistances if r 1 → r 2?
[K/W]
8/19/2019 Part 2b Steady State 1-D Conduction
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/part-2b-steady-state-1-d-conduction 14/50
University of Ottawa, CHG 2314, B. Kruczek 14
Steady-state 1-D conduction – Radialsystems
• Consider a composite cylindrical or spherical wallTotal resistance and overall heat transfer coefficient
Heat is transferred from hot fluid inside to cold fluidoutside through a 3-layer composite wall
If contact resistances are negligible, there are fiveresistances in series, thus:
,1 ,4 ,1 ,4tot
r T T
q UA T T R
tot
1where: UA
R
At steady state R tot and UA are constant , but U depends on A , which varies with r
1
1 1 2 2 3 3 4 4 t U A U A U A U A R UA
1
31 2 1 1 4 1
1 1 2 3 4 4
1
1 1ln ln ln
A B C
U r r r r r r r
h k r k r k r r h
For cylindrical wall:
For spherical wall:
1 2 22 21 2 3 1 3 41 1 2 1
2
1 44
1
1 1 1 11 11 1
A B C
U r r r r r r r r r r
h k k k hr
8/19/2019 Part 2b Steady State 1-D Conduction
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/part-2b-steady-state-1-d-conduction 15/50
University of Ottawa, CHG 2314, B. Kruczek 15
Steady-state 1-D conduction – Radialsystems
• Consider a thin-walled copper tube of radius r i
Critical thickness of insulationNB: Intuitively, as thickness of insulation (wall) increases, the resistance to heat transfer
increases. This is the case for the plane wall, but not necessarily for the radial walls
'
'
r tot
iT T q R
The tube is to be used to transport a low-temperature refrigerant at T i such that T i < T
,T h
To answer question, we need to investigate function R’ tot ( r ). Let’s see if the 1 st derivativecan be equal to zero (why?)
The tube is to be insulated with a material ofthermal conductivity k
What should be the thickness of insulation , r – r i ,to minimize heat gain from the environment?
• Rate equation
where: ' ' ' ln / 1
2 2
i
tot cond conv
r r R R R
k rh
Q: Does R ’ tot increase with r ?
'
2
ln / 1 1 10
2 2 2 2
itot r r dR d
dr dr k rh kr hr
k r
h There a min or max R’ tot at r = k / h
8/19/2019 Part 2b Steady State 1-D Conduction
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/part-2b-steady-state-1-d-conduction 16/50
University of Ottawa, CHG 2314, B. Kruczek 16
Steady-state 1-D conduction – Radialsystems
• Further investigation of R’ tot ( r )Critical thickness of insulation
Evaluation of the 2 nd derivative of R’ tot ( r ) at r = k/h:
,T h
2 '
2 2 2 3
1 1 1 1
2 2 2tot d R d
dr kr dr hr kr r h
Sub-in r = k/h:
2 '
2 2 3 2
1 1 1 10
2 2tot
d R k
h k k dr k hk h
NB: Since d 2 ( R’ tot )/dr 2 > 0: R’ tot ( k/h ) = R ’ tot, min and r =k/h ≡ r cr is the critical radius. Thus,t = r cr – r i = t cr is the critical thickness of insulation
If for a given k ( of insulation ) and h, r i > r cr insulating thetube will lead to increase of thermal resistance
If for a given k ( of insulation ) and h, r i < r cr insulating thetube may lead to a decrease in thermal resistance
Q: Derive expression for r cr in spherical coordinates
The analysis become more complex recognizing that h depends on r , and also when radiation effects are included
8/19/2019 Part 2b Steady State 1-D Conduction
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/part-2b-steady-state-1-d-conduction 17/50
University of Ottawa, CHG 2314, B. Kruczek 17
Example 2 – Problem 3.72
A composite spherical shell of inner radius r 1 = 0.25 m is constructed from lead ofouter radius r 2 = 0.30 m and AISI 302 stainless steel of outer radius r 1 = 0.31 m.The cavity is filled with radioactive wastes that generate heat at the rate of 5 x 10 5 W/m 3 . It is proposed to submerge the container in oceanic waters that are at atemperature of T = 10 oC and provide a uniform convection coefficient of h = 500W/m 2 K at the outer surface. However, environmental activists are concerned that atthese conditions heat generation by the radioactive wastes may result in melting ofthe lead shell and leaking of radioactive wastes to ocean. Are their concerns
justified?
8/19/2019 Part 2b Steady State 1-D Conduction
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/part-2b-steady-state-1-d-conduction 18/50
University of Ottawa, CHG 2314, B. Kruczek 18
Steady-state 1-D conduction with heatgeneration
• Thermal energy is generated from conversion of different forms of energy(e.g., electrical, chemical, nuclear)
Origins of internal heat generation
Resistance to the flow of electrical current liberates thermal energy – Ohmic heating
Example: consider flow of electrical current through a solid system:
2 g eE qV I R where I is the electrical current [ A] and R e is the electrical resistance [ Ω]
Ohmic heating, similarly to nuclear decay, exothermic and endothermic reactions,generally leads to uniform volumetric heat generation
• Energy generation by absorption of external radiationA solid (stationary fluid) is semi-transparent to external radiation (alpha, gammarays, thermal, visible radiation, etc).
The intensity of external radiation gradually decreases (decays) as it passes thoughthe system and as it decreases, heat is generated
Non-uniform heat generation, typically described by:
xq e where is a constant depending on the nature of radiation and x is adistance from the surface through which radiation enters the system
8/19/2019 Part 2b Steady State 1-D Conduction
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/part-2b-steady-state-1-d-conduction 19/50
University of Ottawa, CHG 2314, B. Kruczek 19
Steady-state 1-D conduction with heatgeneration in plane wall
• Heat eq. for 1-D plane wall having constant k and uniform heat generationTemperature distribution
2 2 2
2 2 2 pT T T T
k q ct x y z
2
20
d T k q
dx
Solving governing differential equation by integrating it twice:2
12
d T q dT qdx dx x C
k dx k dx 1
dT qdx x C dx
dx k 2
1 22
qT x x C x C
k
where : C 1 and C 2 are the integration constants, determination ofwhich require specifying two boundary conditions
NB1 : Regardless how boundary conditions are specified,
temperature profile has a parabolic shape
Consider asymmetric boundary conditions:
,1
,2
BC1: 0
BC2:
s
s
T x T
T x L T
,2 ,12
,12 2 s s
s
T T q qT x x L x T
k L k
0 L
8/19/2019 Part 2b Steady State 1-D Conduction
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/part-2b-steady-state-1-d-conduction 20/50
University of Ottawa, CHG 2314, B. Kruczek 20
Steady-state 1-D conduction with heatgeneration in plane wall
• Effect of the location of origin in coordinate systemTemperature distribution
2
1 22
qT x x C x C
k
,1
,2
BC1: 0
BC2:
s
s
T x T
T x L T
,2 ,12
,12 2 s s
s
T T q qT x x L x T
k L k
0 L
Consider previously derived temperaturedistribution for asymmetric BCs:
,1
,2
BC1:
BC2:
s
s
T x L T
T x L T
Origin at one of
two surfacesThickness = L
Origin at mid-planeThickness = 2 L
2 2
,2 ,1 ,1 ,2
21
2 2 2 s s s sT T T T qL x x
T xk L L
8/19/2019 Part 2b Steady State 1-D Conduction
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/part-2b-steady-state-1-d-conduction 21/50
University of Ottawa, CHG 2314, B. Kruczek 21
Steady-state 1-D conduction with heatgeneration in plane wall
• Application of Fourier’s law to previously derived temperature distributions Heat flux (flow)
,2 ,1" 2
,1
,2 ,1
2 2
2
s s x s
s s
T T d q qq k x L x T
dx k L k k q
qx T T L L
0 L
Origin at one oftwo surfacesThickness = L
Origin at mid-planeThickness = 2 L
2 2,2 ,1 ,1 ,2"
2
,2 ,1
1
2 2 2
2
s s s s x
s s
T T T T d qL x xq k
dx k L Lk
qx T T L
Although A does not change in the direction of heat flow, heat flux (flow) is not constant;it varies linearly with x
NB: Since heat flux (flow) varies with x a wall with internal heat generation cannot be a part of
equivalent thermal circuit
8/19/2019 Part 2b Steady State 1-D Conduction
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/part-2b-steady-state-1-d-conduction 22/50
University of Ottawa, CHG 2314, B. Kruczek 22
Steady-state 1-D conduction with heatgeneration in plane wall
• Convective boundary conditionsTemperature distribution with unknown surface temperatures
Suppose that T s ,1 and T s ,2 are unknown , but T ,1 and T ,2 alongwith h 1 and h 2 are known, then:
Thus : Solving simultaneously Eqs. (1) and (2) allows determination of the unknown T s ,1 and T s ,2
Differentiating the derived temperature distribution forthe asymmetric BCs:
1 ,1 ,1
2 ,2 ,2
BC1: at 0 :
BC2: at :
s
s
dT x k h T T
dx
dT x L k h T T dx
0 L
,2 ,1 ,2 ,12
,12 2 2 s s s s
s
T T T T dT d q q q q x L x T x L
dx dx k L k k L k
Using BC1 (at x = 0): ,2 ,1 1,1 ,1 (1)
2 s s
s
T T hq L T T
L k k
Using BC2 (at x = L): ,2 ,1 2,2 ,2 (2)
2 s s
s
T T hq L T T
L k k
8/19/2019 Part 2b Steady State 1-D Conduction
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/part-2b-steady-state-1-d-conduction 23/50
University of Ottawa, CHG 2314, B. Kruczek 23
Steady-state 1-D conduction with heatgeneration in plane wall
• Symmetrical boundary conditionsTemperature distribution and heat flux
T s ,1 = T s ,2 = T s as a result of T ,1 = T ,2 = T and h 1 = h 2 = h
Since T s ,1 = T s ,2 only one surface boundary condition canbe specified – additional BC is needed
Due to thermal symmetry, the position x = 0
corresponds to the mid-plane, where:
0dT
dx
Thermal symmetry plane is equivalent to an adiabaticsurface (perfectly insulated surface)
No heat transfer through aninsulated surface, thus:
0 0dT dT
k dx dx
BC1: at 0 : 0
BC2: at : s
dT x
dx x L T T
2 2
21
2 sqL xT x T k L
• Determination of T s Overall energy balance on the wall:
out 0 g E E 0 s s shA T T q A L
s
qLT T
h
2 2
"
21
2 x sd qL xq k T qxdx k L
8/19/2019 Part 2b Steady State 1-D Conduction
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/part-2b-steady-state-1-d-conduction 24/50
University of Ottawa, CHG 2314, B. Kruczek 24
Steady-state 1-D conduction with heatgeneration in radial systems
• For 1-D radial systems at steady state with constant k and heat generation Heat Equation and boundary conditions
Cylindrical Coordinates Spherical Coordinates
0k d dT
r qr dr dr
2
2 0
k d dT r q
r dr dr
Cylindrical wall Solid cylinder Spherical wall Solid sphere
• Boundary conditionsSolid cylinder and sphere are analogous to a symmetrical wall;there require one surface boundary condition , while the otherone is a result of a max (min) temperature at centerline (point)
0 0dT
r dr
Radial walls require two surface boundary conditions; radial walls may have onesurface insulated
Q : Can solid cylinder (sphere) have “one” surface insulated?
8/19/2019 Part 2b Steady State 1-D Conduction
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/part-2b-steady-state-1-d-conduction 25/50
University of Ottawa, CHG 2314, B. Kruczek 25
Steady-state 1-D conduction with heatgeneration in radial systems
• Consider example of a solid cylinder Temperature distribution and heat flux
0k d dT
r qr dr dr
Solid cylinder
Heat Equation:
Integrating once: Boundary conditions:
BC1: at 0 : 0
BC2: at : o s
dT r dr
r r T T
2
12
d dT qr dT qr r dr dr r C dr dr k dr k
2
22 4
dT qr qr T r C
dr k k
by BC1: C 1 = 0
Rearranging and integrating again:
by BC2: 2
24
o s
r T C
qk
Therefore: 2 2
21
4o
s
o
qr r T r T
k r
• Application of Fourier law: 2 2
"
21
4 2o
r s
o
qr d r qr q k T dr k r
Heat rate:" 2 ' " ' 2 orr r r r r r q q A q Lr q q A q r
NB: A summary of temperature distributions, heat fluxes and heat rates for plane, cylindricaland spherical walls, as well as for solid cylinder and sphere are provided in Appendix C .
8/19/2019 Part 2b Steady State 1-D Conduction
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/part-2b-steady-state-1-d-conduction 26/50
University of Ottawa, CHG 2314, B. Kruczek 26
Example 3 – Problem 3.100
A high-temperature, gas-cooled nuclear reactor consists of a composite cylindrical wall forwhich a thorium fuel element ( k = 57 W/m K) is encased in graphite ( k = 3 W/m K) andgaseous helium flows through an annular coolant channel. Consider conditions for which thehelium temperature is T = 600 K and the convection coefficient at the outer surface of thegraphite is h o = 2000 W/m 2 K.
If thermal energy is uniformly generated in the fuel element at the rate of 10 8 W/m 3, whatare the temperatures T 1 and T 2 at the inner and outer surfaces, respectively, of the fuelelement?
8/19/2019 Part 2b Steady State 1-D Conduction
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/part-2b-steady-state-1-d-conduction 27/50
University of Ottawa, CHG 2314, B. Kruczek 27
Steady-state 1-D conduction – Extendedsurfaces
• The main purpose of extended surfaces ( fins ) is to: Rationale of Extended Surfaces
OR
sq hA T T
Q: If heat transfer from the original and extended surface is byconvection, why do we need conduction analysis?
Increase the rate of heat transfer for a given T Decrease T for a given rate of heat transfer
Original surface
Extended surface
Fins
• Rate of heat transfer Original surface by convection:
Extended surface also byconvection: e b b b f f f q h A T T h A T T
Conduction analysis are required to find how T changeswith the distance from the original surface
( T - T ) is the local driving force for convection from thefin
• Key features/assumptions in conduction analysis
Convection (radiation) from the extended surface is in adirection transverse to that of conduction
One dimensional conduction in the direction away (ortowards) the original surface
8/19/2019 Part 2b Steady State 1-D Conduction
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/part-2b-steady-state-1-d-conduction 28/50
University of Ottawa, CHG 2314, B. Kruczek 28
Steady-state 1-D conduction – Extendedsurfaces
• Heat exchangers with finned
tubes
Configurations and applicationsa) Straight fin with
uniform cross sectionb) Straight fin with non
uniform cross sectionc) Annular fin d) Pin fin
Always non-uniformcross section
uniform ornon-uniform cross section
• Heat sinks used in microelectronics
a) c)
a)
d) With uniformcross section
8/19/2019 Part 2b Steady State 1-D Conduction
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/part-2b-steady-state-1-d-conduction 29/50
University of Ottawa, CHG 2314, B. Kruczek 29
Steady-state 1-D conduction – Extendedsurfaces
Objective: Incorporate extended surface (fins) in thermal circuit• Approach to achieve the main objective:
Derive the governing differential equation for appropriate fin configuration
Identify boundary conditions and solve the differential equation
Rate of heat transfer from the fin based on temperature distributionApplication of Fourier’s law at the base
Application of Newton’s cooling
Fin efficiency
Efficiency of finned surface
Resistance to heat transfer from fin
Resistance to heat transfer from finned surface
Using tabulated expressions for fin efficiency of fins with variable cross-section
Finned surface with integral and attached fins
8/19/2019 Part 2b Steady State 1-D Conduction
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/part-2b-steady-state-1-d-conduction 30/50
University of Ottawa, CHG 2314, B. Kruczek 30
Steady-state 1-D conduction – Extendedsurfaces
Governing differential equation
• Straight fin with variable cross-section
OR in out g st E E E E 0
in out E E
in cond ,x cdT
E q kA
dx
cond ,xout cond ,x dx conv cond ,x conv
dq E q q q dx q
dx
cond,x dxq
2
2c
out c C s c c s
dAdT d dT dT dT d T E kA k A dx hdA T T kA k A dx hdA T T
dx dx dx dx dx dx dx
Substituting rate equationsfor the energy terms:
and
NB: Up till now we started from appropriate for of Heat Equation derived in Chapter 2,but this approach is not applicable for conduction analysis in extended surfaces
convq
1 st law for differential element oflength dx (closed system):
8/19/2019 Part 2b Steady State 1-D Conduction
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/part-2b-steady-state-1-d-conduction 31/50
University of Ottawa, CHG 2314, B. Kruczek 31
Steady-state 1-D conduction – Extendedsurfaces
Governing differential equation
OR
2
0cc s
dA dT d T k A dx hdA T T
dx dx dx
Substituting expressions for Ė in andĖ out into 1 st law:
• Straight fin with variable cross-section
Rearranging: 2
2
10c s
c c
dA dAd T dT hT T
dx A dx dx A k dx
• Annular fin
Starting from 1 st law for closed systems, identifying energy terms,and rearranging it can be show that
2
2
1 20
d T dT hT T
dr r dr kt where t = fin thickness
8/19/2019 Part 2b Steady State 1-D Conduction
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/part-2b-steady-state-1-d-conduction 32/50
University of Ottawa, CHG 2314, B. Kruczek 32
Steady-state 1-D conduction – Extendedsurfaces
Governing differential equation
OR
• Simplification for a straight fin with uniform cross-section
2
2
10c s
c c
dA dAd T dT hT T
dx A dx dx A k dx
• Excess temperature – driving force convection:
Note the units: m 2 [1/m 2 ]
Recognizing that: s s
dAdA Pdx P
dx
Therefore: 2
20
c
d T hP T T
dx A k perimeter
x T x T
• Fin constant: 2 orc c
hP hP m m
A k A k
For pin fin:2
and4c
D A P D
thus:
2 4
hm
kD
For rectangular fin: and 2 2 2c A tw P w t w thus:
2 2
hm
kt
Therefore: 2
22 0
d m
dx
8/19/2019 Part 2b Steady State 1-D Conduction
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/part-2b-steady-state-1-d-conduction 33/50
University of Ottawa, CHG 2314, B. Kruczek 33
Steady-state 1-D conduction – Extendedsurfaces
General solution of the governing differential equation
OR
• Fin with constant cross-section
22
2 0
d m
dx
• Annular fin
Looking for a functionwhose 2 nd derivative equalsto the original function
Because of 2 nd order thesolution must have twoconstants
1 2
mx mxx C e C e
Check:
1 2
mx mxdmC e mC e
dxand
2
2 2
1 22
mx mxdm C e m C e
dx
Therefore, the general solution satisfies the governing ODE
2
2
1 20
d T dT hT T
dr r dr kt
22
2
10
d d m
dr r dr
Modified Bessel
equation of zero order 1 0 2 0r C I mr C K mr
Where: I 0 and K 0 are the modified,zero-order Bessel functions of the firstand second kinds, respectively
NB: Bessel and modified Bessel aretabulated in Appendix B
8/19/2019 Part 2b Steady State 1-D Conduction
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/part-2b-steady-state-1-d-conduction 34/50
University of Ottawa, CHG 2314, B. Kruczek 34
Steady-state 1-D conduction – Extendedsurfaces
Boundary conditions• The specific solutions for the temperature distribution in fins require determination
of constants C 1 and C 2 , which in turn require 2 boundary conditions
x L 0
• BC1 at x = 0
0 0orb b bx xT T T T
• BC2 at x = L
Can be specified in different waysdepending on problem specification
a) In the most general case (as in figure above) – convection from the tip:
orc c
x L x L
dT dhA T L T kA h L kdx dx
b) If the fin is sufficiently long T ( L) T - infinite fin:
or 0
L LT x L T
8/19/2019 Part 2b Steady State 1-D Conduction
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/part-2b-steady-state-1-d-conduction 35/50
University of Ottawa, CHG 2314, B. Kruczek 35
Steady-state 1-D conduction – Extendedsurfaces
Boundary conditions• BC2 at x = L
c) Heat transfer from the tip is negligible – adiabatic tip:
c shA T L T hA T T
0 or 0x L x L
dT d
dx dx
Q: Is it possible to have the exact adiabatic tip conditions for a fin which is not infinitely long?
NB: An infinite fin has adiabatic tip, but a fin having an adiabatic tip is not necessarily infinite
x L 0
T , h T 1 T 2
If T 1 = T 2 ≠ T then:2
0L
x
dT
dx
The rod can be seen as two fins oflength L /2 with a common adiabatic tip
If T 1 > T 2 > T , or T 1 < T 2 < T ,there exists x’ such that0 < x’ < L at which: '
0x x
dT
dx
• Consider a rod connecting two walls
8/19/2019 Part 2b Steady State 1-D Conduction
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/part-2b-steady-state-1-d-conduction 36/50
University of Ottawa, CHG 2314, B. Kruczek 36
Steady-state 1-D conduction – Extendedsurfaces
Boundary conditions• BC2 at x = L
d) Tip is in contact with a surface of knowntemperature – prescribed tip temperature:
x L 0
T , h T b T L
T b > T > T L
L L L x L x LT T or T T
This BC2 exists only if there is no x (0< x < L) for which dT / dx = 0 , which willhappen when:
T b < T < T L OR
If there is x’ (0< x’ < L) for which dT / dx = 0 , there are two fins (one havinglength x’ and the other one having length L- x’ ) with a common tip at x’
NB: In the case of fin with prescribed tip temperature, the heat transferred to the fin at the
base is lost by convection from the side surface and by conduction from the tip
8/19/2019 Part 2b Steady State 1-D Conduction
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/part-2b-steady-state-1-d-conduction 37/50
University of Ottawa, CHG 2314, B. Kruczek 37
Steady-state 1-D conduction – Extendedsurfaces
Specific solution of the governing differential equation
• Consider a fin with constant cross-section and an adiabatic tip
General solution:
Where:
1 2
mx mxx C e C e 0BC1:
bx
BC2: 0x L
d
dxand
Using BC1: 1 2 1 2 (1)b b
C C C C
Using BC2: 1 2 1 20 0 (2)mx mx mL ml
x L
dC e C e mC e mC e
dx
Solving simultaneously Eqs. (1) and (2): 1
mL
b mL mL
eC
e e 2
mL
b mL mL
eC
e eand
Sub-in C 1 and C 2 into general solution and rearranging:
m L x m L xmL mx mL mx
b b bmL mL mL mL mL mLe e e e e ex
e e e e e e
sinh2
x xe exOther hyperbolic function:cosh2
x xe e
x
sinh
tanhcosh
x x
x x
x e ex
x e e
cosh
cothsinh
x x
x x
x e ex
x e e
1sech coshx x
1csch sinhx x
coshcoshb m L xx
mL
8/19/2019 Part 2b Steady State 1-D Conduction
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/part-2b-steady-state-1-d-conduction 38/50
University of Ottawa, CHG 2314, B. Kruczek 38
Steady-state 1-D conduction – Extendedsurfaces
Heat transfer from fin
• Consider a fin with constant cross-section and an adiabatic tip
Where:
At steady state, all heat transferred to orfrom the fin must pass through the base:
, f cond bq q
,
0
f cond b cx
dT q q kAdx
Substituting expression for T ( x ):
, 0
0
coshsinh
cosh coshc b
cond b c b x
x
m L x kAdq kA T T T m m L xdx mL mL
c b c b c b
c
hP M kA m kA kA hPkA
, tanhcond bq M mL
Alternatively, all heat transferred to or from the fin is by convection: 0
L
f convq q hP T T dx
Substituting expression for T ( x ):
0
cosh
cosh
L
conv b
m L xq hP T T T T dx
mL
leads after integration and rearrangements to: ,tanhconv cond bq M mL q
8/19/2019 Part 2b Steady State 1-D Conduction
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/part-2b-steady-state-1-d-conduction 39/50
University of Ottawa, CHG 2314, B. Kruczek 39
Steady-state 1-D conduction – Extendedsurfaces
Summary of expressions for T (x ) and q ffor fins with constant A
c
where:
• Corrected length for convective tip
The expressions for adiabatic tip can be used for fins with a convective tip byreplacing actual length ( L) with a corrected length ( Lc ), where:
For pin fin:
For rectangular fin:
4cL L D 2
cL L t
8/19/2019 Part 2b Steady State 1-D Conduction
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/part-2b-steady-state-1-d-conduction 40/50
University of Ottawa, CHG 2314, B. Kruczek 40
Example 4 – Problem 3.126
Turbine blades mounted to a rotating disc in a gas turbine engine are exposed to a gas stream that is at T
= 1200 oC and maintains a convection coefficient of h = 250 W/m 2 K over the blade. The blades, which arefabricated from Inconel, k = 20 W/m K, have a length L = 50 mm. The blade profile has uniform cross-sectional area Ac = 6 x 10 -4 m 2 and a perimeter of P = 110 mm . A proposed blade-cooling scheme, whichinvolves routing air through the supporting disc, is able to maintain the base of each blade at a temperatureof T b = 300 oC.
a) If the maximum allowable blade temperature is 1050 oCand the blade tip may be assumed to be adiabatic, is theproposed cooling scheme satisfactory?
b) For the proposed cooling scheme, what is the rate atwhich heat is transferred from each blade to thecoolant?
8/19/2019 Part 2b Steady State 1-D Conduction
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/part-2b-steady-state-1-d-conduction 41/50
University of Ottawa, CHG 2314, B. Kruczek 41
Steady-state 1-D conduction – Extendedsurfaces
Fin performance
• Fin effectiveness ( ε f )
The ratio of the fin heat transfer rate to the heattransfer rate that would exist without the fin:
,
f
b b f
c Aq
hIn the limiting case of infinitely long fin:
f c bq M hPkA
f c
kPhA NB: The use of fins is justified when ε f ≥ 2
• Fin efficiency, ( η f )
Ratio of the actual fin heat transfer rate tomaximum fin heat transfer rate:
max
f f
f
f
b
q qq h A
Fin efficiency in terms of temperature profile
q max is represented by the area of a rectangleunder the dashed red line, A max
q is represented by the area under theactual temperature profile, A
a L
max
f A
AThus:
f aL
Lor
8/19/2019 Part 2b Steady State 1-D Conduction
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/part-2b-steady-state-1-d-conduction 42/50
University of Ottawa, CHG 2314, B. Kruczek 42
Steady-state 1-D conduction – Extendedsurfaces
Fin efficiency
• Consider a fin with constant cross-section
Regardless of type of the fin: f f f bq hA
Thus:
f c bq M hPkA
tanh tanhc b c
f b
hPkA mL mLkAhPL hP L
tanh f mLmL
For a fin with adiabatic tip :
For a fin with convective tip , the equation for the adiabatic tip isapplicable in which L is replaced by Lc
For infinite fin :
tanh tanh f c bq M mL hPkA mL
Thus:
1c b c f
b
hPkA kAhPL hP L
1
f mL
A f
Q: What is the efficiency oftruly infinitely long fin?
NB: For a fin with prescribed tip temperature, the concept of fin efficiency is applicableonly to the portion of heat transferred to/from the fin by convection
8/19/2019 Part 2b Steady State 1-D Conduction
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/part-2b-steady-state-1-d-conduction 43/50
University of Ottawa, CHG 2314, B. Kruczek 43
Steady-state 1-D conduction – Extendedsurfaces
Efficiency of fins with variable cross-section
• Tabulated expressions for the efficiency of common fin shapes fromTable 3.5
Pin Fins
8/19/2019 Part 2b Steady State 1-D Conduction
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/part-2b-steady-state-1-d-conduction 44/50
University of Ottawa, CHG 2314, B. Kruczek 44
Steady-state 1-D conduction – Extendedsurfaces
Efficiency of fins with variable cross-section• Tabulated expressions for the efficiency of common fin shapes from
Table 3.5 - continuedStraight Fins
8/19/2019 Part 2b Steady State 1-D Conduction
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/part-2b-steady-state-1-d-conduction 45/50
University of Ottawa, CHG 2314, B. Kruczek 45
Steady-state 1-D conduction – Extendedsurfaces
Graphical representation of fin efficiency• Geometrical parameter of fin
Consider straight fins (rectangular, triangular, parabolic profiles) and annular finwith rectangular profile:
1/21/2
3/22c c c
c p
hP hmL L LkA kA
where A p is the fin profile area
Fin efficiency presented graphically as a function of: 1/2 3/2
p ch kA L
Q: Why Lc of triangular andparabolic fins is equal to L?
8/19/2019 Part 2b Steady State 1-D Conduction
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/part-2b-steady-state-1-d-conduction 46/50
University of Ottawa, CHG 2314, B. Kruczek 46
Steady-state 1-D conduction – Extendedsurfaces
Graphical representation of fin efficiency• Efficiency of annular fin of rectangular profile
8/19/2019 Part 2b Steady State 1-D Conduction
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/part-2b-steady-state-1-d-conduction 47/50
University of Ottawa, CHG 2314, B. Kruczek 47
Steady-state 1-D conduction – Extendedsurfaces
Incorporation of fins into thermal circuits
• Resistance to heat transfer from a fin ( R t , f )
Rate of heat transfer from a fin in terms of fin efficiency: f f f bq hA T T
Q: Is it possible to incorporate a fin with prescribed tip temperature to a thermal circuit?
Alternatively,
,
b f
t f
T T q
Rtherefore,
,
1 f
f t
f
RhA
• Finned surfaceIn practical applications individual fins are arranged in fin arrays
The concept of fin efficiency is extendedinto the concept of overall efficiency of
surface ( o ):
o
t
t b
qhA
Where: q t = the total rate of heat transferand A t = total surface area
NB: It is assumed that heat transfer coefficients from fins and prime surface are the same
8/19/2019 Part 2b Steady State 1-D Conduction
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/part-2b-steady-state-1-d-conduction 48/50
University of Ottawa, CHG 2314, B. Kruczek 48
Steady-state 1-D conduction – Extendedsurfaces
Incorporation of fins into thermal circuits
• Relationship between fin and surface efficiency
Surface efficiency is a weighted average ofefficiency of fins and prime surface
t f f b b bq N hA hA
Where: N = number of fins, A b = prime surface area ( A b =A t - NA f )
Efficiency of prime surface is 100% (why?)
Sub-in for A b and rearranging:
1 1 f t t f b t o b
t
NAq hA hA
A
Thus:
1 1 f
t
o f NA
A
Since:
,
bt t o b
t o
q hAR ,
1o
tt
o
RhA
• Resistance of finned surface ( R t ,o )
8/19/2019 Part 2b Steady State 1-D Conduction
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/part-2b-steady-state-1-d-conduction 49/50
University of Ottawa, CHG 2314, B. Kruczek 49
Steady-state 1-D conduction – Extendedsurfaces
Incorporation of fins into thermal circuits • Thermal circuit for finned surface
Fins attached to the base – contact resistance
,
1o
t
t
oR hA
Integral fins
1 , ,1 / f f t c c bC hA R A
,
1
o
o c
t c
t R
hA
where: 1
1 1
f f o c
t
NA
A C and
8/19/2019 Part 2b Steady State 1-D Conduction
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/part-2b-steady-state-1-d-conduction 50/50
Example 5 – Problem 3.144
An isothermal silicon chip of width W = 20 mm on a side is soldered to an aluminum heat sink ( k = 180 W/mK) of equivalent width. The heat sink has a base thickness of Lb = 3 mm and an array of rectangular fins,each of length Lf = 15 mm. Airflow at T = 20 oC is maintained through channels formed by fins and a coverplate, and for a convection coefficient of h = 100 W/m 2 K, a minimum fin spacing of 1.8 mm is dictated bylimitations on the flow pressure drop. The solder joint has a thermal resistance of R” t,c = 2 x 10 -6 m 2 K/W.
a) Consider limitations for which the array has N = 11 fins, in whichcase values of the fin thickness t = 0.182 mm and pitch S = 1.982mm are obtained from the requirements that W = ( N – 1) S + t and S
– t = 1.8 mm. If the maximum allowable chip temperature is T c =85 oC, what is the corresponding value of the chip power? (Anadiabatic fin tip condition may be assumed, and airflow along theouter surfaces of the heat sink may be assumed to provide aconvection coefficient equivalent to that associated with airflow
through the channels.) b) With ( S -t ) and h fixed at 1.8 mm and 100 W/m 2 K, respectively,
explore the effect of increasing fin thickness by reducing the numberof fins. With N = 11 and S – t fixed at 1.8 mm, but relaxation of theconstraint on the pressure drop, explore the effect of increasing theairflow and hence the convection coefficient.