parking requirements and housing affordability
DESCRIPTION
Parking Requirements and Housing Affordability. Michael Manville Department of City and Regional Planning Cornell University September 19, 2013. The Purpose of Parking Requirements. Prevent congested curb parking. Problem 1: They Don’t Work Very Well. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Parking Requirements and Housing Affordability
Michael ManvilleDepartment of City and Regional Planning
Cornell UniversitySeptember 19, 2013
The Purpose of Parking Requirements
• Prevent congested curb parking
Westwood Village Parking Requirement: 1.5 spaces per efficiency apartment, 2.5 spaces per 2-bedroom apartment
Problem 1: They Don’t Work Very Well
Problem 2: Distorted Development Decisions, Distorted Landscapes
Pre-War Building7,500 sq ftPre-
100% efficiency
Same Building, 2013:
3,125 sq. ft. (improvements)
12 stalls (4 per 1,000 sq. ft.)
Illustration: MDA Johnson Favaro Architecture & Urban Design
42% efficiency
All transportation systems have three basic elements:
Vehicles Rights of way Terminal capacity
Trains Tracks StationsAirplanes Sky AirportsShips Oceans SeaportsCars Roads Parking spaces
Shifting the Cost of Vehicle Ownerhsip into Cost of Housing
• Makes it difficult to build housing– For certain people (those who don’t own cars or don’t
need them on-site with housing)– On some parcels (small lots)– In some buildings (historic structures with no parking
and no room to provide it)– In some neighborhoods (if a neighborhood is
dominated by small parcels/old buildings)In sum: infill gets harder. Housing at lower price-points
gets harder.
50 apartments
550 sq feet apiece
You think you can sell 50 units to people you don’t want onsite parking
• 1 space per unit parking requirement – 50 spaces
• 1 sq ft parking per 2 sq ft of apartment
• Go underground: lose six units to the ramp
• Underground only holds 33 spaces ($40-50k per space)
• 44 units, 33 spaces
• Dig second level ($$$)
• Can’t just dig 11 spaces – end up with 66 spaces for 44 units
• Marginal cost of the 34th space is extraordinary
• You need a variance (Good luck)
• Even with the variance, you are now building to a higher price point
Surface parking instead
Building shrinks to 30 units
You have 19 spaces
Still not enough; need to shrink to 25 units or get a variance
Again building for a higher price point
Things that don’t matter to the city:How much each additional space costsWhether off-street parking is abundant in the neighborhood (how much you could sell your spaces for)Whether transit is nearby
Why Can’t the Private-Sector Provide Lower-Income Housing?
Why Do Old Buildings Sit Vacant?
• 322 apartments, developer added 200 on-site spaces
• Downtown Requirement: 1 space per unit minimum
• With parking requirement, maximum 200 units
• Would not have penciled out• Historic building, fully
occupied, $1,200 month• Illegal to build it today
Concerns
• No one will build parking/ Spillover parking
• Meters (or permits) manage curb parking
Conclusions
• Parking requirements mandate quantity and location without respect to cost
• Attempt to solve a problem on public streets by regulating private land
• If cities manage street-parking, off-street parking takes care of itself– Cities that think they need parking requirements
usually need parking meters