park stewardship program - fy 2012 and 2013 - annual report on restoration
DESCRIPTION
This report summarizes the accomplishments of Park Stewardship Program's (PSP) Restoration activities at Oakwood Valley, Wolfback Ridge, Milagra Ridge, and Mori Point during the 2012 and 2013 fiscal years.TRANSCRIPT
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 1
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 2
Park Stewardship Program
Annual Report on Restoration
FY 2012 & FY 2013
10/1/2011 - 9/30/2013
Oakwood Valley - Wolfback Ridge - Milagra Ridge - Mori Point
February 20, 2014
Prepared by:
Christina Crooker, Restoration Manager Ruby Kwan, Assistant Project Coordinator
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 3
1. INTRODUCTION
Lupinus albifrons at Milagra Ridge
This annual report summarizes the accomplishments of Park Stewardship Program’s (PSP) restoration
actions at Oakwood Valley, Milagra Ridge, Mori Point, and Wolfback Ridge during the fiscal years of
2012 and 2013. In future years we hope to feature restoration work at all our stewardship sites in
Marin, San Francisco, and San Mateo Counties, including work at Lands End, Presidio Coastal Bluffs, Dias
Ridge, and Muir Beach.
This report was developed for internal recordkeeping, information-sharing within different departments
of the Parks Conservancy, the Presidio Trust, and National Park Service. This document may also be a
helpful reference for future PSP staff and interns, as well as a helpful reference for Parks Conservancy
promotional, fundraising and outreach activities.
In order to help discern which projects are volunteer- friendly and which are not, we have marked
invasive species work with the following symbols:
A leaf represents invasive species work conducted by staff, interns or contractors
A hand represents invasive species work conducted by volunteers
The “Future Projects and Resource Needs” listed under each site shows tasks that fall into one of three
categories:
Those that require technical skills, such as tree removal projects that require certifications in
chainsaw operation and herbicide application.
Those that are beyond the scope of our finite volunteer resources and limited field staff to
achieve greater control of invasives that we know to be manageable – given the proper
resources, such as extensive broom removal at Marincello or Oakwood Valley.
Removal of invasive plants in challenging locations including cliff sides or poison oak patches.
Areas of need have been listed by site in this report, and will be prioritized in follow-up meetings with
key park managers.
Data on work hours and exotics removed are taken from the Work Performed Database.
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 4
2. ALL PARK STEWARDSHIP SITES
Tools for success
2.1 DISTRIBUTION OF LABOR
These hours represent invasive species removal work in the field that were entered in the work
performed database. Other types of work such as endangered species monitoring or planning and
scoping are not captured but are a significant focus of the restoration team.
The vast majority of total work hours continue to be spent at Mori Point (68%). This trend originated
with the transformation of Mori Point and project-oriented funding allocated toward restoration
that started in 2007.
We expect to see a more equitiable distribution of volunteer resources across all sites in the future.
As usual, Wolfback Ridge received the least amount of hours (4%) primarily due to difficult
conditions for volunteers.
FIGURE 2-1. FY2013. Proportion of all work performed hours by site (n = 4,204).
Mori Point 47%
Oakwood Valley 28%
Milagra Ridge 19%
Wolfback Ridge 6%
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 5
2.2 DISTRIBUTION OF LABOR – ANNUAL COMPARISON
The amount of work at Mori has decreased due to completion of Phase 1 of the Mori Point
Restoration and Trails Project.
FIGURE 2-2. FY2013. Proportion of volunteer hours performed by site (n = 1,627). There were no volunteers at Wolfback Ridge.
Oakwood Valley 22%
Mori Point 63%
Milagra Ridge 15%
FIGURE 2-3. Annual comparison of work performed hours at each site.
0
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
14,000
Mori Point Oakwood Valley Milagra Ridge Wolfback Ridge
Wo
rk h
ou
rs
CY 2006CY 2007FY 2008FY 2009FY 2010FY2011FY 2012FY 2013
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 6
Volunteerism across all sites (including school groups, regular volunteers, and special groups)
peaked in 2010.
FIGURE 2-4. Annual comparison of volunteer hours.
1,284
1,925
2,637
3,099
3,758
2,470 2,538
1,527
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Vo
lun
tee
r h
ou
rs
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 7
3. OAKWOOD VALLEY
Rolling green hills at Oakwood Valley
3.1 WORK PERFORMED SUMMARY
Maintained a French broom-free corridor on either side of Alta Avenue to protect the Wildland
Urban Interface.
Planted 307 coyote brush in Wildland Urban Interface tree removal areas and removed invasive tree
saplings.
Maintained our investment in revegetated areas by removing disturbance-loving weeds from all our
planting footprints.
Controlled French broom in the vicinity of Mission blue butterfly (MBB) habitat patches.
Continued Oakwood Valley–wide Cape ivy eradication.
Tested the effects of different types of mulch on native planting success.
Monitored Mission blue butterflies and documented an increasing population.
Removed 184 blue gum eucalyptus and 365 acacia trees as part of Phase 1 of the Oak Rehabilitation
Project, funded by a private donor to rehabilitate oak forests in the aftermath of a massive dieback
due to Sudden Oak Death.
Planted 362 coyote brush and 135 oak acorns to revegetate oak woodlands.
Protected the health of wetland meadows by removing invasive perennial grasses.
Controlled incipient populations of invasive plants site wide.
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 8
3.2 WORK HOURS CONTRIBUTED
In 2013, Oakwood Valley was primarily managed by Parks Conservancy staff and interns who
contributed nearly 50% of work hours.
The North Bay Conservation Corps contributed 17% of hours as part of the privately funded Oak
Rehabilitation Project.
25% of hours are from special groups (large volunteer events and corporate groups).
Regular drop in programs and ongoing school partnerships accounted for 6% of work hours.
Increases in regular programming, especially with local colleges would help to accomplish volunteer-
friendly tasks like broom control.
Restoration Technicians replaced contractors in 2011 in maintaining a broom-free Wildland Urban
Interface at Oakwood Valley.
Volunteerism peaked in 2010.
FIGURE 3-1. Oakwood Valley. Annual comparison of work hours contributed by group type.
0
200
400
600
800
1,000
Staff Contractor/Rest. Techs. Volunteer Youth Intern Program
Wo
rk h
ou
rs
CY2006CY2007FY2008FY2009FY2010FY2011FY2012FY 2013
FIGURE 3-2. Oakwood Valley FY 2013. Proportion of work hours contributed by group type (n=1,168).
Conservation Corps 17%
Restoration Technicians
14% Interns
31% Staff 4%
Special Groups 25%
School Program 4%
Volunteer Program
2%
Youth Intern Program
3%
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 9
3.3 INVASIVE SPECIES
See maps in Appendix for detailed information on species and locations treated.
3.3.1. General Control
Mission blue butterfly habitat
Hand pulled French and Scotch broom
within MBB patches 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, and
10.
Re-treated Harding grass near MBB
patches 7 & 8. Broom is decreasing
each year.
Treated cotoneaster in MBB patch 8.
Cotoneaster is a problem in all MBB
sites and should be targeted more
widely.
Wetland meadows
Re-treated Harding grass, tall fescue,
and orchard grass in Bagshaw, Social,
and Middle Meadows.
Amount of invasive Harding grass and
tall fescue are decreasing each year.
Harding grass is being replaced by
velvet grass in Bagshaw meadow.
However, velvet grass is a lower priority
since it is already is widely established
at Oakwood and seems to thrive only in
wet sites, whereas Harding grass is still
incipient and can overtake dry butterfly
habitat.
Cape ivy
Followed-up on all patches of this park
priority invasive plant. We flagged and
counted resprouts which continue to
decline annually.
Removed tarps covering Cape ivy.
Controlled general weeds such as wild
radish, bristly ox-tongue, poison
hemlock, Italian, bull, and sow thistles
from Patch 3058 and Cape ivy piles.
Figure 3-3. Experienced staff, like Restoration Intern Marcela Maldonado, remove broom in the vicinity of lupines, which are carefully flagged.
Figure 3-4. Restoration intern Zachariah Jefferson assesses a patch of ox-eye daisy at Marincello. Afterwards, Zachariah and Marcela, apply mulch in areas where ox-eye daisy was removed.
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 10
Revegetation areas
Mulched entire planting area to suppress Italian thistle, bull thistle, and poison hemlock.
Removed annual grasses (Avena and Bromus sp.), thistles, and poison hemlock from around
plantings to reduce competition.
Treated Italian thistle, bull thistle, and poison hemlock in planting footprint.
Oakwood Valley trail
Treated general weeds (Italian and bull thistle, invasive grasses, poison hemlock, and fennel)
along valley trails and Alta Ave.
Incipient invasives
Removed harlequin flower, panic veldt grass, and ox-eye daisy. Controlled ox-eye daisy at
Marincello and mulched to prevent resprouts.
Mapped populations of panic veldt grass, harlequin flower, and ox-eye daisy for follow-up.
3.3.2 Broom Control
French broom was controlled by Go Native in MBB patches 9 and 10 in 2010. Follow-up control in
those areas resumed in 2012 and 2013.
Striated broom was targeted at Marincello in 2012 with youth from Project Regen. It was also
targeted in 2009 with Go Native. Much more work remains.
Scotch broom was removed from above MBB patch 8 in 2012.
French broom is removed annually within the Wildand Urban Interface, a 15 foot corridor along
either side of Alta Avenue, cleared in 2004 to reduce the threat of fire in the park escaping to nearby
Marin City.
FIGURE 3-5. Oakwood Valley. Annual comparison of French and Scotch broom individuals treated site-wide.
0
50000
100000
150000
200000
250000
300000
350000
400000
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
# o
f in
div
idu
als
rem
ove
d Scotch broom
French broom
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 11
The need for follow-up control within the Wildland Urban Interface at Alta Avenue has dropped
since 2007. However, ongoing follow up is still significant, costing the Park Stewardship Program
approximately $5,000 per year in Restoration Technician time to maintain our 2004 investment.
3.3.3 Treatment of Cape Ivy Resprouts
Cape ivy has been treated with the goal of complete eradiation from Oakwood Valley since 2006.
Seven patches have not had resprouts in two or more years (DEOD 3056, 3054, 3051, 3167, 3132,
and 3187, New Patch).
Eight patches remain active, but the number of resprouts continues to diminish, underscoring the
importance of our long–term commitment to control.
Another patch was located in 2013, called Fresh Patch. This patch is across the stream from DEOD
3056 and it is likely an extension of this patch. Control was conducted where it spans the stream in
2013, and full control (scrape to bare earth and tarp) is slated for 2014.
FIGURE 3-6. Oakwood Valley. Annual comparison of French and Scotch broom individuals treated at the Wildland Urban Interface (WUI).
0
100000
200000
300000
400000
500000
600000
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
# o
f in
div
idu
als
rem
ove
d Scotch broom
French broom
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 12
3.3.4 Oak Rehabilitation Project
Phase 1
Worked with a private donor to
rehabilitate oak woodland in the
aftermath of a coast live oak
dieback due to Sudden Oak Death.
Restored 5.45 acres containing
coast live oak seedlings and
saplings.
Removed 365 invasive acacia trees
(A. dealbata and A. melanoxylon).
Removed 184 eucalyptus trees.
Phase 1 cost: $15,500.
See Oakwood Valley Restoration
Project Progress Report 2012 and
Oakwood Valley and Oakwood Valley Restoration Project Phase 2 Progress Report 2013.
FIGURE 3-7. Oakwood Valley. Number of Cape ivy resprouts each year.
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160#
of
Cap
e iv
y re
spro
uts
Non-quantified treatment 2009 (resprouts counted) 2010 (resprouts counted)2011 (resprouts counted) 2012 (resprouts counted) 2013 (resprouts counted)
FIGURE 3-8. Oakwood Valley. Oak Rehabilitation Project map. White polygons represent areas where eucalyptus and acacia trees were removed.
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 13
3.4 REVEGETATION
3.4.1 Wildland Urban Interface (former eucalyptus removal areas)
To outcompete thistles and poison hemlock that are
invading former Eucalyptus removal sites:
282 coyote brush were planted in 2012.
26 coyote brush were planted in 2013.
Used different mulching methods to suppress invasive
weeds and measured coyote brush survival in each.
In Pacheco, where soils are deeper and moister, coyote
brush survival was enhanced by the addition of either
plastic or cardboard mulch to rice straw mulch. This is
likely due to reduced competition from poison hemlock.
In EUGL 6, where soils are thinner and less organic, there
was no apparent effect of mulching regime on coyote
brush survival.
See Coyote brush survivorship with different mulching methods at EUGL 6, Oakwood Valley and
Coyote brush survivorship with different mulching methods at Pacheco subsite, Oakwood Valley
for details.
FIGURE 3-10. Poison hemlock grows through holes in cardboard and plastic mulch where coyote brush was planted.
FIGURE 3-9. Oakwood Valley. Oak Rehabilitation Project before (top) and after (bottom) pictures of acacia trees removed.
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 14
3.4.2 Oak Rehabilitation Project (eucalyptus and acacia removal areas)
Planted 362 coyote brush in 2013 to revegetate areas where eucalyptus and acacia were removed
as part of the Oak Rehabilitation Project.
Survivorship of coyote brush has not yet been quantified but they appear to be thriving.
FIGURE 3-11. Oakwood Valley. Coyote brush survival under different mulching regimes.
68% 65% 68%
48%
81%
90%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Straw mulch only Plastic sheeting & straw mulch Cardboard sheeting and strawmulch
% s
urv
ival
of
coyo
te b
rush
EUGL 6
Pacheco
FIGURE 3-12. Oakwood Valley. Oak Rehabilitation Project before (top) and after (bottom) pictures of eucalyptus/acacia trees removed, and subsequent outplanting of coyote brush in the project footprint.
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 15
Planted 135 coast live oak acorns. Acorns were planted three to a hole and when more than one
germinated, extra oak seedlings were either cut or transplanted elsewhere in June 2013 to ensure
the survival of one seedling.
44% of germinated acorns survived.
See Survivorship of Quercus agrifolia, Oak Rehabilitation Project
3.5 SPECIAL STATUS SPECIES
3.5.1 Special Status Species Monitoring
3.5.1.1 Mission blue butterfly
337 Mission blue butterflies were observed
on-transect in 2013, contributing to an
overall trend of increased abundance.
General trends in Mission blue butterfly
distribution were consistent with previous
years.
The flight season lasted 58 days, beginning
May 4th and ending July 5th, the latest date ever recorded at Oakwood Valley.
See FINAL REPORT, 2012 Mission Blue Butterfly Survey, Oakwood Valley and FINAL REPORT, 2013
Mission Blue Butterfly Survey, Oakwood Valley for details.
FIGURE 3-13. Oakwood Valley. Oak Rehabilitation Project. Survivorship of direct seeded coast live oak acorns.
% alive 44% % dead
56%
FIGURE 3-14. Restoration Intern Marcela Maldonado measures wind speed and temperature while monitoring Mission blue butterflies.
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 16
3.6 FUTURE PROJECTS AND RESOURCE NEEDS
This section highlights high priority projects that are not currently addressed due to limitations in
staffing or funding.
3.6.1 Funding
Annual maintenance funds for maintaining the Wildland Urban Interface (WUI) are almost
expended. Follow-up maintenance on the WUI footprint costs approximately $5,000 per year.
Additional funds or increased volunteerism will be needed to continue maintaining the fuel breaks.
Another funding source of approximately $8,000 is available in service from Shelterbelt contractors.
This may be a good fit to begin working on either cotoneaster near MBB patches or to do partial
follow up on Marincello broom.
Even with these current funding projects, additional long-term funding is needed to more
thoroughly deal with the larger scale invasive species problems outlined below.
Volunteerism has decreased at Oakwood Valley, whereas invasive species control needs have
increased. The goal in the year ahead is to transition the Marin Team into Oakwood Valley and
increase volunteerism.
3.6.2 Invasive Species
Striated broom at Marincello
Continues to persist and spread along the Marincello site. The Habitat Restoration team
(HRT) manages broom above the Marincello road and Park Stewardship manages broom
below the Marincello Road.
FIGURE 3-15. Oakwood Valley. Mission blue butterfly observations per year. Overall relative abundance is not comparable to data collected prior to 2010 due to differences in monitoring methods.
87 87
197
337
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
2010 2011 2012 2013
# o
f M
issi
on
blu
e b
utt
erfl
ies
FIGURE 3-16. A Mission blue butterfly takes flight while another rests on a summer lupine.
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 17
A $5,251 contract was
completed in 2010, which
treated only a small portion
of the total footprint.
This project is best
completed with contractors
who can cut and treat large
plants with herbicide.
Limited work on smaller
plants could be done with an
increase in volunteerism.
An effort to map, assess, and estimate cost of project should be conducted.
Cape ivy
There is a Cape ivy patch on the Marincello side of Oakwood Valley that Tanya Baxter and
HRT used to maintain.
We need to coordinate with HRT to ensure that the patch is treated annually.
Incipient invasives
Jubata grass, tower of jewels, and other
invasives are growing along the east-facing
slopes of Alta Avenue and may spread into
sensitive habitat if not controlled.
An effort to map, assess and control
outliers should be initiated.
Cotoneaster, French and Scotch brooms
These invasive shrubs continue to persist,
spread, and create dense thickets in key
areas within and between Mission blue
butterfly patches.
Patches should be mapped, prioritized and
slated for control.
French and Scotch broom can be removed
with a significant increase in volunteer
support.
Cotoneaster must be controlled by staff or
contractors as it will require power tools
and carefully timed herbicide applications
to be successful.
To estimate cost of cotoneaster removal,
we plan to map all cotoneaster infestations
site-wide in the spring of 2014.
FIGURE 3-18. Oakwood Valley. Incipient jubata grass invades coastal scrub on east facing slopes.
FIGURE 3-17. Oakwood Valley. Yellow broom at Marincello viewed from Alta Avenue.
FIGURE 3-19. Restoration interns Zachariah and Aaron Anderson control French broom growing adjacent to lupine marked by the white pin flags.
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 18
Eucalyptus
Large saplings continue to grow around the edges of Eucalyptus patches leading to ever-
expanding groves.
Their removal will require contractor support since trees must be felled with chainsaws.
Estimated cost $12,920.
3.6.3 Sudden Oak Death
In 2006 a large infestation of the native California oak moth swept through Oakwood Valley leaving
hundreds of oak trees defoliated. Many of these trees subsequently died.
In 2012, testing revealed that the pathogen causing Sudden Oak Death had infected several coast
live oak trees at Oakwood Valley.
We suspect that the combination of Sudden Oak Death, other pathogens, and defoliation by the oak
moth caused the massive die off of oaks.
The death of oak trees has opened up light gaps throughout the oak-bay woodland canopy, leaving
oak forest vulnerable to infestations by disturbance loving invasive plants.
FIGURE 3-21. Oakwood Valley. Eucalyptus saplings in the foreground of the large eucalyptus grove and cotoneaster (red).
FIGURE 3-20. Oakwood Valley. Cotoneaster (patches of red) are invading Mission blue butterfly habitat.
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 19
A program to monitor and assess the impact of light gaps on understory composition should be
considered.
FIGURE 3-22. Oakwood Valley. Extent of oak dieback due to the California oak moth.
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 20
4. WOLFBACK RIDGE
View towards the south from Wolfback Ridge
4.1 WORK PERFORMED SUMMARY
No volunteers worked at Wolfback Ridge in 2013. The site was managed entirely by Parks
Conservancy staff and interns.
Continued removing French and Scotch broom throughout Wolfback Ridge. We still do not have
enough resources to remove all flowering broom each year.
Completed initial removal of a patch of tower of jewels just east of Waldo Tunnel.
Increased removal efforts for thoroughwort and panic veldt grass.
Planted 200 summer lupine as part of the Lupine Diversification Project.
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 21
4.2 WORK HOURS CONTRIBUTED
No volunteer groups were hosted at Wolfback Ridge in 2012 or 2013. This is in part due to difficult
access, steep terrain, ticks, and plentiful poison oak.
Restoration technicians, staff, and interns conducted all work at Wolfback in 2013, funded by Park
Stewardship.
FIGURE 4-1. Wolfback Ridge. Annual comparison of work hours contributed by group type.
0
50
100
150
200
250
Staff Contractor/Rest. Techs. Volunteer Youth Intern Program
Wo
rk h
ou
rs
CY2006CY2007FY2008FY2009FY2010FY2011FY2012FY 2013
FIGURE 4-2. Wolfback Ridge FY 2013. Proportion of work hours by group type (n=277).
Restoration Technicians
50%
Interns 45%
Staff 5%
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 22
4.3 INVASIVE SPECIES CONTROLLED
4.3.1 General Control
See maps in Appendix for detailed information on species and locations treated.
Tower of jewels
Finished controlling tower of jewels (Echium pininana, formerly E. candicans) from Drainage
1 manually and with herbicide. Control resulted in soil disturbance and light gaps,
conditions that favor secondary invaders like Italian thistle.
Panic veldt grass
Followed up on Ehrharta treatment that was initiated in 2008. Treatment intervals need to
increase to ensure efficacy.
Thoroughwort
Expanded thoroughwort control to Ridge 1 in 2013. Completed follow-up on efforts initiated
in 2008. Follow-up was conducted manually in order to ensure success and to limit non-
target impacts to native species. Treatment intervals likely need to increase to ensure
efficacy.
Scotch broom
Follow-up treatment of Scotch broom in Over the Tunnel, Drainage 1, and Ridge 1. Initial
work in Over the Tunnel completed by contract under Maria Alvarez prior to 2010.
Eucalyptus and Monterey pine
Removed young eucalyptus and pine in understory of mature trees and adjacent areas.
FIGURE 4-4. Wolfback Ridge. Annual comparison of area treated by species.
05,000
10,00015,00020,00025,00030,00035,00040,00045,000
General Weeding Thoroughwort Panic Veltdgrass Echium
Are
a tr
eate
d (
m2 )
CY 2006CY 2007FY 2008FY 2009FY 2010FY 2011FY 2012FY 2013
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 23
French broom
Swept Drainages 1 & 2, Ridge 1, and Over the Tunnel. Hand pulled over 14,000 individuals.
We do not have enough resources to treat all flowering broom at Wolfback. Additional
funds for Restoration Technicians will be needed to complete removal.
Since 2007, French broom follow-up needs have remained fairly steady.
FIGURE 4-5. Wolfback Ridge. Annual comparison of individuals treated by species.
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
Monterey Pine Blue Gum Eucalyptus Scotch Broom
Ind
ivu
dal
s tr
eate
d
CY 2006CY 2007FY 2008FY 2009FY 2010FY 2011FY 2012FY 2013
FIGURE 4-6. Wolfback Ridge. Annual comparison of French broom individuals treated.
19,500
5,620
12,510
0
5,026
8,095
14,026
5893
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
CY 2006 CY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013
Ind
ivid
ual
s tr
eate
d
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 24
4.4 REVEGETATION
Planted summer lupine (Lupinus formosus) on grassy slopes
as part of the Lupine Diversification Project funded by the
California Garden Club.
Since summer lupine is more resilient to pathogen outbreaks,
their purpose is to buffer against future fungal pathogen
attacks on silver lupine, the butterfly host plant growing there
naturally.
25 summer lupine were planted in winter 2011/2012. As of
March, 2013, 28% survived.
175 summer lupine were planted in winter 2012/ 2013. As of
March, 2013, 30% survived.
Cardboard was placed around the lupines at the time of planting to prevent competition from
invasive grasses. Cardboard was subsequently changed to black landscaping fabric to reduce its
visual impact from roadways.
See Project: Mission Blue January – August 2012 Report and Project: Mission Blue May –
December 2011 Report for details.
4.5 SPECIAL STATUS SPECIES
Mission blue butterflies at Wolfback Ridge are monitored annually by NPS natural resources
specialist Susie Bennett.
Mission blue butterflies were observed off transect in a patch of bush lupine (Lupinus arboreus) in
2010.
The majority of bush lupine (Lupinus arboreus) plants that were discovered to be hosting Mission
blue butterflies in 2010 were dead in 2012. We assume they succumbed to a pathogen since
uniform natural senescence of all plants within the population is unlikely.
Summer lupines were planted in the vicinity of bush lupines in the hopes that some Mission blue
butterflies may have survived and will be able to use newly planted lupines.
FIGURE 4-7. Restoration intern Cody Ender puts cardboard around a lupine she just planted.
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 25
4.6 FUTURE PROJECTS AND RESOURCE NEEDS
This section highlights high priority projects that are not adequately addressed due to limitations in
staffing or funding.
4.6.1 Invasive Species Control
Scotch and French broom
We have been controlling Scotch and French broom for years but are still not able to control
all flowering plants each year.
One limiting factor is access. We should clear a wide path so that volunteers can access the
site without contacting poison oak. Also, we should provide a way of crossing the drainage
that keeps volunteers safe and dry.
Some of the broom in open grasslands could be tackled with these improvements and
volunteer support from the Marin and Volunteer Teams.
Most of the broom is within poison oak and tick- heavy scrub and should be reserved for
contractors, staff, or restoration technicians. Park Stewardship currently spends $5,000 on
restoration technician support a year, but this is not enough to control all flowering broom
each year.
Blackwood acacia
The grove of acacia trees continues to spread.
We will need contract funds to remove or control it since it requires chainsaws and herbicide.
FIGURE 4-8. Wolfback Ridge. Acacia grove spreading.
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 26
Blue gum eucalyptus
The remaining eucalyptus trees are greater than 8 inches dbh and will therefore require a
contract for removal.
Panic veldt grass
Panic veldt grass is spreading in mixed scrub in the Over the Tunnel subsite. We have not
initiated control here as we are still trying to get a handle on controlling it where it grows in
more easily managed monotypic stands.
We are not certain that it should be a priority.
4.6.2 Revegetation
Summer lupine
Additional experimentation with growing and planting summer lupine should be conducted.
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 27
5. MILAGRA RIDGE
Coastal view from atop Milagra Ridge
5.1 WORK PERFORMED SUMMARY
Volunteers tend primarily to Scotch broom, pines, and ox-eye daisy work.
Other invasive species work, and monitoring and experimentation, is conducted by Parks
Conservancy staff.
Completed initial removal of a patch of tower of jewels.
Continued efforts to eradicate patches of Cape ivy.
Controlled 5.25 acres of jubata grass at Lower Milagra Ridge.
Controlled more than 5 acres of French broom at Lower Milagra Ridge.
Experimented on control of ox-eye daisy, Bermuda buttercup, and tower of jewels.
Planted 136 varied colored lupine in winter 2011/2012.
Planted 248 lupines in 2012/2013.
Discovered that mechanical treatments result in greater number of lupine seedlings than burn or
control treatments, but also reduce native plant cover more.
Monitored Mission blue butterflies, San Bruno elfin butterflies, and California red-legged frogs.
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 28
5.2 WORK HOURS CONTRIBUTED
Volunteerism has decreased overall at Milagra Ridge while staff and intern time has held fairly
constant.
This year, contractors contributed 34% of labor to Milagra Ridge due to funds from the Connemara
Development Project at Lower Milagra Ridge.
FIGURE 5.1. Milagra Ridge. Annual comparison of work hours by group type.
0
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
Staff Contractor/Rest. Techs. Volunteer Youth Intern Program
Wo
rk h
ou
rs
CY 2006CY 2007FY 2008FY 2009FY 2010FY 2011FY2012FY 2013
FIGURE 5-2. Milagra Ridge FY 2013. Proportion work hours by group type (n=793).
Contractors 34%
Restoration Technicians
1%
Interns 21%
Staff 7%
School Program
13%
Special Groups
1%
Volunteer Program
17%
Youth Intern Program
6%
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 29
5.3 INVASIVE SPECIES CONTROLLED
5.3.1 General Control
See maps in Appendix for detailed information on species and locations treated.
Scotch broom
Continued weed wrenching Scotch broom around the Water District Fenced Area, the Rock
Ridge Garden, the Northwest Prairie, and the Southeast Prairie. In most areas, broom is
reduced to resprouts and immature plants.
Mature broom stands remain in Southeast Prairie area between Eucalyptus grove and Pond
where very large plants grow in scrub with poison oak making removal by volunteers
difficult.
Cut/stump treatment or hand removal by restoration technicians or the Restoration team
may be necessary.
Ox-eye daisy
Controlled ox-eye daisy in Nike Basin and
found and controlled two satellite
populations in Southeast Prairie.
Despite experimental evidence that ox-eye
daisy control can be successful when done
diligently, the number of bags of ox-eye
daisy removed at Milagra Ridge are not
declining.
Control efforts in 2012 and 2013 were
intensive since it was part of the weekly
duties of the Mission blue butterfly monitor.
FIGURE 5-3. Milagra Ridge. Annual comparison of Scotch broom individuals removed.
Milagra
22042
10810
2877
802
10183
7940
903
3705
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
CY 2006 CY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY2011 FY2012 FY 2013
Ind
ivid
ual
s tr
eate
d
FIGURE 5-4. Ox-eye daisy basal leaves.
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 30
In 2011 & 2012 we mulched areas where removal was conducted in response to
experimental treatments. A layer of thicker mulch could be applied in future years..
Cape ivy
Maintained containment line in patches 1001/3 and 1005. Patches
1001/3 and 1005 are too large, steep, and erosive to initiate control.
These patches are being contained over the long-term.
Conducted follow-up work in patches 1014, 1013, and 1035, and
partial follow-up in 1004. Patches 1014, 1013 and 1035 are under
control and require only regular follow up. Patch 1004 requires more
intensive efforts to gain control.
Removed disturbance-loving weeds from patches including mustard and poison hemlock.
Poison hemlock is becoming a problem in areas of 1004 that were formerly Cape ivy piles or
that were treated with herbicide.
FIGURE 5-5. Milagra Ridge. Annual comparison of the number of bags of ox-eye daisy removed.
22
12
15
7
14 12.5
9 10
0
5
10
15
20
25
CY 2006 CY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY2011 FY2012 FY 2013
# o
f b
ags
rem
ove
d
FIGURE 5-6. Milagra Ridge. Annual comparison of Cape ivy resprouts removed.
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
DEOD 1013 DEOD 1014 DEOD 1004 DEOD 1035
# if
Cap
e iv
y re
spro
uts
20092010201120122013
Gray bars indicate control that was too extensive to be quantified
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 31
Monterey pine
Conducted roving removal in the Southeast Prairies and Rock Ridge Garden. Work is
ongoing.
Restoration interns cut larger pines in poison oak in 2013.
Front gate area
This area continues to be infested by mustards and thistles. It is largely denuded and
disturbed by road clearing and trail maintenance efforts. We suggest mulching and
scattering seed or planting low growing cover. Plants were requested for next planting year
to outcompete invasives.
Bellardia
Continued removal in Nike Basin in 2012. Bellardia was not highly productive at Milagra
Ridge in 2008 and 2009 and 2013; since it was not found in the Nike Site these years it was
not removed.
We are not sure what factors contribute to annual abundance of Bellardia.
Jubata grass
Removed scattered jubata grass from the Northwest Prairie, Southeast Prairie and Rock
Ridge Garden.
Conducted initial removal in Lower Milagra Ridge (see below).
Tower of jewels
Conducted hand removal of Echium pininana in upper part of Patches 1, 2, and 4. The lower
part of Patch 1 has a lot of poison oak making removal dangerous for volunteers.
Eucalyptus
Contained grove for first time since 2009 by controlling saplings along perimeter.
FIGURE 5-7. Milagra Ridge. Annual comparison of Monterey pine trees removed.
2540 2540
5430
3790
738
4201
30
1505
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
CY 2006 CY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY2011 FY2012 FY 2013
Ind
ivid
ual
s tr
eate
d
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 32
5.3.2 Lower Milagra Ridge Invasive Species Control
As mitigation for the Connemara
housing development, 36 acres of
natural open space lands were
dedicated to the National Park Service
for the preservation, restoration, and
management of habitat for the federally
endangered species.
Approximately $75,000 was donated to
support these efforts.
We created an interim management
plan for invasive species control that was
approved by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and targets three
priority invasives 1) invasive trees 2) French broom 3) jubata
grass.
Initial work is planned for FY 2014.
See Interim Management Plan for Invasive Species Control,
Connemara Conservation Easement Dedication and
Development Project for details.
5.3.2.1 Jubata grass in Lower Milagra Ridge
5.25 acres of jubata grass treated at Lower Milagra Ridge.
Contracted to Shelterbelt Builders for a cost of $3,447.85.
FIGURE 5-8. Milagra Ridge. Annual comparison of individuals treated by species.
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
Tower of Jewels Jubata Grass New Zealand TeaTree
Cotoneaster Monterey Cypress Blue GumEucalyptus
Ind
ivid
ual
s tr
eate
d
CY 2006CY 2007FY 2008FY 2009FY 2010FY2011FY2012FY 2013
FIGURE 5-10. Jubata grass grows rampant at Lower Milagra Ridge.
FIGURE 5-9. The Connemara housing development at Lower Milagra Ridge.
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 33
5.3.2.2 French broom in Lower Milagra Ridge
Removed 14,900 French broom over 5 acres.
Contracted to Go Native for a cost of $ 12,741.
5.3.3 Experiments
5.3.3.1 Ox-eye daisy control
Mulching in 2010 accelerated the reduction in seedlings after the first year, but all treatments seem
to have similar levels of success in the long run, in this case, after 5 years. With diligent follow up,
ox-eye daisy is greatly reduced, but not eradicated from any of these plots after five years of
treatment. This underscores the importance of long-term follow up.
FIGURE 5-12. Before (left) and after (right) of French broom removal at Lower Milagra Ridge.
FIGURE 5-11. Before (left) and after (right) of jubata grass treatment at Lower Milagra Ridge.
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 34
We also assessed efficacy of different treatments. Although herbicide appears most efficient, the
time needed for herbicide prep and clean up reduces the time actually spent removing and treating
ox-eye daisy. Therefore, hand removal is the most straightforward method to remove ox-eye daisy
while offering similar levels of success.
TABLE 1. Summary of work hours contributed to remove ox-eye daisy from test plots. Area/hour/individual is based on the
combined area of test plots per treatment. For example, there are four 2mX2m herbicide treatment plots which equate to 16
m2, and three hand removal plots.
Treatment Total # of hours Total # of individuals hours/individual area /hr/individual
Herbicide – staff/interns 53 36 1.47 10.87 m2
Hand removal – staff/interns 57 35 1.63 7.37 m2
Hand removal - volunteers 315 90 3.50 3.43 m2
See Milagra Ridge Test Plots for Ox-eye Daisy Removal for more information.
5.3.3.2 Bermuda buttercup control
We compared the percent cover of Bermuda buttercup (Oxalis pes-caprae) before and after two or
three years of treatment. Scraping and herbiciding offered the greatest reduction in cover, while
flaming did little to reduce cover. However, both scraping and herbiciding damage native plants and
are not viable means of controlling oxalis within a matrix of native scrub. Further after three years
of treatment, there is still significant cover.
FIGURE 5-13. Milagra Ridge. Results from the ox-eye daisy control experiment.
120
20
60 72
20
52
34
127
27
57
82
12
39
4 12
66
30
7 5 4 14
2
19
1 4 4 2 4
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
Hand Removal Hand Removal Hand Removal 2% RoundupPro; 1.5%
Aquamaster in2011
2% RoundupPro; 1.5%
Aquamaster in2011
50% RoundupPro; 1.5%
Aquamaster in2011
50% RoundupPro; 1.5%
Aquamaster in2011
Plot 1 Plot 2 Plot 3 - Mulchin 2010
Plot 4 Plot 5 - Mulchin 2010
Plot 6 - Mulchin 2010
Plot 7
# o
f in
div
idu
als
rem
ove
d
2008 2010 2011 2012 2013
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 35
We refrained from any treatment for a year and a half and measured the percent cover of oxalis
again. We found that oxalis readily recolonized non treated areas, further making this type of
control undesirable.
Unless we can use different chemical treatments on oxalis, we have no plans to initiate control at
Milagra.
See Bermuda Buttercup (Oxalis pes-caprae) Control Study at Milagra Ridge for details
5.3.3.3 Tower of jewels
Tested two treatments on Echium pininana 1) Foliar treatment with 1.5% Aquamaster and 2) cutting
at the base with no herbicide. Found that foliar treatment was 100% effective and cutting at the
base was 75% effective.
FIGURE 5-14. Milagra Ridge. Percent cover of oxalis.
78
28
63
41
58 54
77
64
42 34 34
30
0
20
40
60
80
100
Before After Before After Before After Before After Before After Before After
Roundup Pro 2% Scraping Flaming Control Roundup Pro 1%* Roundup Pro0.5%*
After one year and three months After two years
Pe
rce
nt
cove
r
FIGURE 5-15. Milagra Ridge. Percent cover of woody natives.
10 17
0
12
0 12
17 17
36
9
38
10
0
20
40
60
80
100
Before After Before After Before After Before After Before After Before After
Roundup Pro 2% Scraping Flaming Control Roundup Pro 1%* Roundup Pro0.5%*
After one year and three months After two years
Pe
rce
nt
cove
r
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 36
Since we must return annually to scout and remove
seedlings, we can conduct follow up on the 25 % that
resprouts fairly easily.
We propose simply cutting the plants because it
involves less time in set up and clean up, can be done
without time restrictions, is more comfortable for the
worker due to the reduced need for PPE and does not
use chemicals.
However, foliar treatment may be beneficial when
plants are in thick poison oak and access to their bases
is difficult for the worker.
5.3.3.4 Velvet grass
We installed two plots to test the effectiveness of
hand removal in controlling H. lanatus at Milagra
Ridge, with the goal of informing best management
practices at this particular site. Hand removal was
tested because it is the most approachable
method, a factor that is especially important given
that PSP frequently works with of volunteers.
Results are pending.
See Test Plots for Purple Velvet Grass (Holcus lanatus) Removal for details.
5.4 REVEGETATION
5.4.1 Lupine Diversification Project
Planted varied color lupine and summer lupine as part of
the Lupine Diversification Project funded by the California
Garden Club. The purpose is to buffer against future
fungal pathogen attacks on silver lupine, the butterfly
host plant growing there naturally.
We planted 136 varied colored lupine (Lupinus variicolor)
in winter 2011/2012. As of March, 2013, only 10%
survived.
We planted 248 lupine in 2012/2013. As of March, 2013,
77% survived.
Varied lupine was collected from the Northwest Prairie.
FIGURE 5-16. Restoration intern Zachariah Jefferson removes tower of jewels.
FIGURE 5-18. A planted Lupinus variicolor.
FIGURE 5-17. A meter by meter quadrat was used to conduct point-intercept vegetation surveys of each test plot.
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 37
See Project: Mission Blue January – August 2012 Report and Project: Mission Blue January – May –
December 2011 Report for details.
5.4.2 Mission Blue Butterfly Habitat Disturbance Project
NPS Park Vegetation Ecologist Alison Forrestel analyzed data collected in 2011 from lupine
disturbance plots and found that mechanical treatment (brushcutting and scraping) seemed to
result in increased numbers of germinating lupine seedlings.
However, mechanical treatments were also associated with the greatest increases in non-native
grasses and the greatest decreases in native plant cover.
We have not yet decided what management actions to take based on the results of the study.
FIGURE 5-19. Milagra Ridge. Results from the Mission blue butterfly habitat disturbance project.
5.5 SPECIAL-STATUS SPECIES
5.5.1 Special-Status Species Protection
5.5.1.1 California red-legged frog – cattail and tule
removal
Documented a significant expansion of tule and cattail
between 2012 and 2013. Prior to 2011, the footprint
had been constant for many years.
Cut tule and cattail back to its 2011 footprint.
0
10
20
30
40
50
Control Burn Mech
# o
f im
mat
ure
lup
ine
Marin
Milagra
-0.3
-0.2
-0.1
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
chan
ge in
re
lati
ve c
ove
r ControlBurnMechanical
native grasses
native shrubs
native forbs
non-native forbs
non-native grasses
FIGURE 5-20. Tule and cattail were cut back.
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 38
5.5.2 Special Status Species Monitoring
5.5.2.1 California red-legged frog monitoring
Monitored California Red-legged frog egg masses at the
oxidation pond. Found 20 egg masses in 2013.
5.5.2.2 Mission blue butterfly monitoring
2012 was the poorest year on record for Mission blues at
Milagra Ridge.
Only two Mission blue butterflies were recorded on
transect, marking the lowest relative abundance ever
documented.
Only two transects supported Mission blue butterflies,
marking the narrowest distribution ever documented.
Only two surveys detected Mission blue butterflies,
marking the second shortest flight season ever
documented.
2013 was better, but still poor overall.
Eight Mission blues were recorded on transect.
Three transects supported Mission blues.
The flight season only lasted four weeks.
See 2012 Mission Blue Butterfly Monitoring Report – Milagra Ridge and 2013 Mission Blue
Butterfly Monitoring Report – Milagra Ridge for details.
FIGURE 5-22. Milagra Ridge. Number of California red-legged frog egg masses observed each monitoring season.
27
81
53
40
39 31
35
61
12
68
51
43
20
0
20
40
60
80
100
2000/2001 2002/2003 2004/2005 2006/2007 2008/2009 2010/2011 2012/2013
# o
f C
RLF
egg
mas
ses
FIGURE 5-23. Volunteer Diane Darling monitors Mission blue butterflies.
FIGURE 5-21. A California red-legged frog egg mass.
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 39
5.5.2.3 Mission blue butterfly egg monitoring
In 2010 a study to investigate the effects of different disturbance regimes on lupine host plant
recruitment was undertaken in part at Milagra Ridge.
The burn treatment subplots supported the highest number of Missionblue eggs, followed by
mechanical treatment, then control suggesting that both disturbance regimes positively influenced
butterfly oviposition.
Mission blue butterfly eggs were detected in three out of four plots. In contrast, adult butterflies
were only detected in one of these plots.
See Final Report, 2013 Mission Blue Butterfly Survey, Milagra Ridge for details.
FIGURE 5-24. Milagra Ridge. Number of Mission blue butterfly observations per year.
20
46
57
46
3 3
30
22
11
28
13 12 14
21 23
5 3 2 7
2
8
0
10
20
30
40
50
60#
of
Mis
sio
n b
lue
bu
tte
rflie
s # MBB Observations (Transects 1-13.5)
# MBB Observations (including Transects A, B, C)
FIGURE 5-25. Milagra Ridge. Number of Mission blue butterfly egg observations per year.
12
5 4
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
Burn Control Mechanical
# o
f M
BB
egg
s
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 40
5.5.2.4 Lupine pathogen monitoring
We quantified the extent that a fungal pathogen, Colletotrichum lupini, adversely affected plants in
the Quarry subsite over time.
The majority of plants are affected each year; however, extent of impact per plant has been
significantly reduced in 2013 (5%) since it was first detected in 2010 (50%).
See Final Report, 2013 Mission Blue Butterfly Survey, Milagra Ridge and Literature review for
Colletotrichum lupini for details.
5.5.2.5 San Bruno elfin butterfly monitoring
Numbers of San Bruno elfin butterflies decreased slightly in
2012 but continue an overall trend of increase.
Many environmental parameters were tested to determine a
relationship with butterfly abundance but none had a
significant relationship.
See Final Report, 2012 San Bruno Elfin Butterfly Survey,
Milagra Ridge and Final Report, 2013 San Bruno Elfin
Butterfly Survey, Milagra Ridge for details
FIGURE 5-26. Milagra Ridge. Percent of lupine leaf dieback as a result of fungal pathogen.
92.46%
80% 84.52%
69%
50%
25% 25%
5%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
2010 2011 2012 2013
% d
ieb
ack
% Dieback in Patch % Leaf Dieback per Plant
FIGURE 5-27. San Bruno elfin larva.
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 41
5.6 FUTURE PROJECTS AND RESOURCE NEEDS
This section highlights projects that are high priority but are currently not adequately addressed due
to limitations in staffing or funding.
5.6.1 Invasive Species Control
Tower of jewels
Tower of jewels (Echium pininana) is spreading on west-facing slopes.
Large-scale tower of jewel control should be conducted by contractors or restoration
technician since they grow on steep slopes within poison oak.
FIGURE 5-28. Milagra Ridge. Number of San Bruno elfin larvae observed each year.
8
4
24
23
9 10
1
12
60
28
35
1.5
1.5
12.0
7.7
9.0
5.0
1.0 1.5
6.7
4.0
2.9
0.0
2.0
4.0
6.0
8.0
10.0
12.0
14.0
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 **2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
# of SB
E larvae/su
rvey
# o
f SB
E la
rvae
# OF LARVAE # OF LARVAE / SURVEY
FIGURE 5-29. Milagra Ridge. The tall flower stalks of tower of jewels show that it is spreading fast on west-facing slopes.
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 42
Bermuda buttercup
Bermuda buttercup is spreading and outcompeting native seedlings resulting in mature
bushes with an understory of nothing but oxalis.
In spite of testing different control methods, we have not determined an effective control
method that does not harm native plant communities.
Velvet grass
Velvet grass is spreading throughout the site.
Volunteers may be able to control it in satellite populations but an increase in volunteerism
is needed in order to do so.
Poison hemlock
Poison hemlock is spreading within the gullies along north facing slopes and will require a
significant long-term investment of control and revegetation to rehabilitate.
Cape ivy
Several Cape ivy patches have been historically mapped but have not been re-located in
current times.
Efforts should focus on finding these and determining whether control or containment is
appropriate.
5.6.2 Skyridge Mitigation Parcel
The adjacent parcel Skyridge has many incipient and established invasives that are spreading
and could spread into Milagra Ridge proper. These include jubata grass and echium.
The Home Owners Association (HOA) ceased paying annual mitigation funds many years ago
and so management has stopped in this area.
The park should pursue acquiring these funds so that management can continue in this area.
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 43
6. MORI POINT
Wildflowers at the Point
6.1 WORK PERFORMED SUMMARY
Maintained our investment in revegetated areas by removing disturbance-loving weeds from all our
planting footprints.
Controlled high priority invasive species across Mori Point (Cape ivy, and cotoneaster, French
broom, Italian buckthorn).
Planted 8,298 plants and field divisions of 21 species to fill-in previously planted areas in 2012
Planted 3,224 plants of 15 species were planted to fill-in previously planted areas in 2013.
Continued experimenting with methods to control Cape ivy resprouts.
Demonstrated success in reinvigorating coastal bluff wildflower populations at the Point through a
direct seeding experiment.
Concluded that the Mori Point trail system effectively protects sensitive species while allowing
visitors to enjoy the park via a Visitor Use Study.
Monitored California red-legged frog breeding success at the Mori Point ponds.
Mapped Italian buckthorn and Cape ivy populations.
Analyzed revegetation survivorship and revegetation community composition.
Contracted Go Native to construct a sensitive habitat protection fence along the Pollywog Path to
protect San Francisco garter snake and California red-legged frog from off trail use.
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 44
6.2 WORK HOURS CONTRIBUTED
With the conclusion of Phase 1 of the Mori Point Restoration and Trail Plan and associated grant
funding, the amount of time Park Stewardship spends at Mori Point continues to decrease.
2012 marked the last year for grant-funded restoration technicians, who contributed nearly half of
all work hours at Mori Point (42%). Another 41% was contributed by volunteers. Youth interns
spent the least amount of time working at Mori Point.
FIGURE 6-2. Mori Point. Annual comparison of work hours by group.
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
7,000
8,000
9,000
Staff Contractor/Rest. Techs. Volunteer Youth Intern Program
Wo
rk h
ou
rs
CY 2006CY 2007
FY 2008FY 2009FY 2010
FY 2011FY2012FY 2013
FIGURE 6-3. Mori Point FY 2013. Proportion of work hours contributed by group (n=1,966).
Contractors 1% Restoration
Technicians 13%
Interns 22%
Staff 8%
Special Groups
16%
School Program
23%
Volunteer Program
13%
Youth Intern Program
4%
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 45
6.3 INVASIVE SPECIES CONTROLLED
6.3.1 General Control
See maps in Appendix for detailed information on species and locations treated.
General weeding in revegetation areas
Much of our time at Mori Point is spent maintaining our investment in revegetation areas.
After the construction and decommissioning of trails, building of ponds, and several large-
scale invasive species removal projects, disturbed areas were revegetated. We continue to
work with volunteers and staff to control disturbance-loving weeds from these areas. As
planting areas increase annually, so does our general weeding footprint
We expect the general weeding area to continue to decrease over time as native plantings
grow and outcompetes weeds.
Decommissioned trails in Bowl
Bristly ox tongue, thistle, fennel, and poison hemlock were treated in the decommissioned
trails in the bowl.
Invasive grasses
Pulled or cut along the Pollywog Path prior to the 4th of July in order to reduce fire risk to
neighbors.
Periwinkle
Control not needed this year, indicating that repeated herbicide treatment in previous years
has finally resulted in control.
FIGURE 6-4. Mori Point. General weeding area trend over 6 years.
0
11,265
49,781
56,679
66,387
43,265
35659
0
10,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
50,000
60,000
70,000
CY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013
Are
a tr
eate
d (
m2 )
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 46
French broom
Removal was initially conducted via foliar spray with Shelterbelt builders in 2006. After
approximately 3 years of follow-up spraying, the site has become dominated by teasel,
poison hemlock and French broom seedlings.
In 2013, broom plants were removed by hand to avoid non target impacts and give natives a
chance to grow.
Most broom grows in poison oak areas but some grows on slopes and could be tackled by
hardy volunteers.
Teasel
A dense stand in the Bowl has been successfully converted to native scrub and little follow
up is needed.
Cotoneaster
In 2013, an intensive treatment of germinated seedlings was initiated within all Cotoneaster
control areas. Seedlings were too numerous to quantify but we covered 26,293 square
meters.
Italian buckthorn
Based on 2012 mapping efforts, invasive Italian buckthorn trees were removed by Go Native
in 2013. Project cost $ 420.
Jubata grass
We hand removed 50 large jubata grass on the Bluffs and followed up on all other areas.
FIGURE 6-5. Mori Point. Area of species removed.
0
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
14,000
16,000
Bristly OxTongue
FieldMustard
Teasel Cape Ivy ItalianThistle
InvasiveGrass
PoisonHemlock
Periwinkle FrenchBroom
Are
a tr
eate
d (
m2 )
CY 2006
CY 2007
FY 2008
FY 2009
FY 2010
FY 2011
FY 2012
FY 2013
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 47
Incipient invasives
Early detection and rapid response efforts have been successful; we did not find any
Echinochloa crus-gallii, Anthema cotula, Leucanthemum vulgare , or Centauria calcitrapa in
2013.
Tall fescue - we found and treated an incipient patch of Festuca arundinacea.
Garland daisy (Chrysanthemum coronarium) was also found and treated in the bowl this
year. It seems to be spreading and should be watched carefully.
Yellow flag iris was removed for the first time in 2013 just south of the southern pond in
areas that used to contain standing water.
Trifolium angulstifolium. We did not treat this in 2013 but should watch for it across from
the bulletin board.
Cape ivy
We continued to pull resprouts in each of the Cape ivy patches that received initial
treatment in 2010. We visit patches three to five times per year to flag and remove
resprouts. After 3 years, resprouts have markedly decreased, but follow up is needed until
several years have passed with no documented resprouts.
We tracked efficacy of Cape ivy resprouts control in two patches at Mori Point that were
initially treated (cutting all vegetation, raking, and tarping all plant material) in March 2011.
Results are similar with a 95 to 100 % decrease in resprouts in Year 3 for either treatment.
FIGURE 6-6. Mori Point. Individual species treated.
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
Cotoneaster Monterey Pine Monterey Cypress Jubata Grass
Ind
ivid
ual
s tr
eate
d
CY 2006CY 2007FY 2008FY 2009FY 2010FY 2011FY 2012FY 2013
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 48
6.3.2 Invasive Species Mapping
Italian buckthorn was mapped throughout Mori Point in 2012.
Cape ivy locations were mapped in conjunction with San Francisco State University. The mapping
will be used to determine Cape ivy control areas and locations of containment lines for a long-term
Cape ivy management strategy.
See Mapping species distribution of Cape ivy (Delairea odorata) in Mori Point National Recreation
Area: Implications for resource management and conservation planning for details.
FIGURE 6-7. Mori Point. Individual Cape ivy resprouts over time. Cape ivy resprouts are decreasing.
338
225
542
303
63
235
54 7 10
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
East Peak Bowl West Bowl
# o
f C
ape
ivy
resp
rou
ts
Total FY 2011
Total FY 2012
Total FY 2013
FIGURE 6-8. Mori Point. In Year 3, the number of Cape ivy resprouts decreased by 95-100 percent depending on patch and treatment.
97 % 96%
95%
100%
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
Manual Herbicide Manual Herbicide
Bowl Patch West Bowl Patch
# o
f C
ape
ivy
resp
rou
ts
2011
2012
2013
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 49
6.4 REVEGETATION
6.4.1 Revegetation in Winters 2011/2012 & 2012/2013
2011/2013
8,298 plants and field divisions of 21 species were planted to fill-in previously planted areas
at Mori Point. All plants were grown at Oceana Native Plant Nursery.
2012/2013
3,224 plants of 15 species were planted to fill-in previously planted areas at Mori Point. All
plants were grown at Oceana Native Plant Nursery.
6.4.2 Revegetation Survivorship Monitoring
Median survivorship of all planted areas site- wide was 74%.
See Mori Point Restoration and Trail Plan Revegetation Report 2007-2012 for a detailed summary
of all revegetation efforts to date.
6.4.3 Revegetation Community Monitoring
We worked with San Francisco State University (SFSU) to assess
the success of revegetation efforts. We established transects
in reference and revegetation areas over five vegetation
communities.
SFSU students found that there was no significant difference
between broad categories of vegetative cover between
reference and revegetation areas in four of five plant
FIGURE 6-9. Mori Point. Survivorship of plants per planting area.
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%
100%
Ben
ches
Bo
wl
Mid
dle
Po
nd
*
No
rth
ern
Po
nd
**
Po
int*
*
Sou
th B
ow
l**
Sou
ther
n P
on
d
Up
per
Slo
pe*
**
Wes
t B
ow
l
Wet
lan
d
% S
urv
ivo
rsh
ip
2008-2009 2009-2010
FIGURE 6-10. Restoration interns and SFSU students monitor vegetation transects.
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 50
communities. One revegetated community was significantly more native than its reference
transect.
We conclude that revegetation efforts at Mori Point exceeded goals.
See Restoration Success at Mori Point for details.
6.4.4 Coastal Bluff Direct Seeding Plots
Direct seeding plots were established in three areas at the Point in 2012. The soil was decompacted
in all plots. Half of each plot was seeded with coastal bluff species and half was left unseeded to see
if decompaction alone would stimulate a native seed bank.
An early bloom of goldfields and tidy tips, followed by a later bloom of farewell to spring, appeared
in the seeded plots. Non-seeded, but decompacted plots contained mostly weeds.
Based on our success in 2012, we expanded each plot in 2013.
See Memorandum: Mori Point – Direct Seeding the Point & Memorandum, 2013 Mori Point Direct
Seeding for details.
FIGURE 6-11. Mori Point. Decompacted but unseeded (left) and decompacted and seeded (right) plots.
FIGURE 6-12. Mori Point. 2012 and 2013 direct seeding plots.
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 51
6.5 VISITOR USE
We conducted a post-implementation visitor use
survey at Mori Point.
The study tracked visitor use on specific trail segments
and assessed use of amenities such as benches and
signage.
We concluded that the new trail system is effective in
reducing off-trail impacts to sensitive habitats while
providing a range of visitor use activities.
Three additional popular trails are in need of
enhancement to protect the integrity of the immediate
surroundings and accommodate visitor use
preferences.
See Mori Point Post-Implementation Visitor Use Report, Assessing the effectiveness of the
new Mori Point trail system in reducing off -trail effects to sensitive habitats for details
FIGURE 6-14. Mori Point. 2012 visitor use summary map.
FIGURE 6-13. Dog walking is a popular activity at Mori Point.
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 52
6.6 SPECIAL STATUS SPECIES
6.6.1 Special Status Species Protection
6.6.1.1 Pollywog Path fence
We installed a split redwood fence to protect the San
Francisco garter snakes, the California red-legged
frog, and their habitats from off-trail use. The fence
was installed adjacent to the Pollywog Path via a
contract with Go Native. The bottom of the fence was
left open to facilitate wildlife movement per NPS
specifications.
Park users provided overwhelmingly positive
feedback.
6.6.1.2 Outreach on domestic cats
Park Stewardship staff photo documented and
recorded the location and activity of domestic cats
seen at Mori Point between October 2011 and
December 2012.
We worked with NPS natural resources staff to draft a
brochure and outreach strategy to provide education
to the residents of the Fairway neighborhood about
the impacts of domestic cats on wildlife.
The final strategy will be implemented by NPS
personnel.
FIGURE 6-16. Feedback towards to Pollywog Fence was positive.
Positive 86%
Negative 2%
Neutral 12%
FIGURE 6-17. A domestic cat stalks prey in a planting area at Mori Point.
FIGURE 6-15. The Pollywog Fence.
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 53
We also worked with a student from San Francisco State to conduct a study on the impact of
domestic cats at Mori Point.
See Effects of Feral and Domestic Cats at Mori Point for details.
FIGURE 6-18. Mori Point. 2012 map of cat observations.
6.6.1.3 Tule & cattail management in ponds
We strive to maintain a variety of habitat
types to balance competing management
needs and to provide more diverse
habitat for the California red-legged frog
and San Francisco garter snake. Tule and
cattails provide good substrate for egg
mass attachment, but also have an
aggressive growth habit with the
potential to take over open water habitat
and fill in the ponds, thereby harming
special-status species in the long-term.
We manage tule and cattails by
maintaining a cover of less than 50% in
order to maintain a mosaic of open water and emergent vegetation in the Willow and Northern
ponds. Tule and cattails rapidly expanded between 2012 and 2013.
FIGURE 6-19. Tule and cattail removal at the Northern pond at Mori Point.
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 54
We aggressively remove them from the Middle and Southern ponds.
6.2.2 Special Status Species Monitoring
6.2.2.1 California red-legged frog
Egg mass monitoring
We monitor California red-
legged frog egg masses each
winter in coordination with
NPS natural resource staff.
In the winter of 2012/13
California red-legged frog egg
masses were slightly less
numerous than in the past two
years, but still demonstrate an
overall increasing trend since
pond construction. This winter
was also particularly dry which
may contribute to the decline
in egg mass numbers.
The larger Wetland and Southern ponds continue to support the greatest number of
California red-legged frog egg masses.
See Final Report, 2013 California red-legged frog survey, Mori Point for details.
FIGURE 6-21. Mori Point. Summary of egg masses observed per monitoring season.
3 12 3
23
35 28
128 130
113
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
2004/05 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 2012/13
# o
f C
RLF
egg
mas
ses
FIGURE 6-20. Monitoring for California red-legged frog egg masses.
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 55
Radio tracking
NPS Aquatic biologist Darren Fong
spearheaded a radio tracking study in the
spring of 2012 to determine where
California red-legged frogs go during non-
breeding season.
Interestingly, the frogs at Mori Point mostly
went nowhere, at least during the
monitoring timeframe.
Only one frog ventured over Mori Ridge to
the south to spend its time on the banks of
Calera Creek. The other frogs not only
remained in the ponds at Mori Point, but
they exhibited high site fidelity to specific
ponds and did not move much between ponds.
Park Stewardship has observed that the frogs generally stay at the ponds through the
summer and are usually absent from Mori Point just before the rainy season in the late fall.
The results of the telemetry study are consistent with our observations.
6.6.2.2 San Francisco garter snake
Observational surveys
NPS aquatic biologist Darren Fong initiated
observational surveys for San Francisco
garter snakes in 2013.
Six snakes were observed during seven
surveys.
Incidental sightings
FIGURE 6-22. Mori Point. Summary of egg masses observed per monitoring season at each pond.
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
2003/04 2004/05 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 2012/13
# o
f C
RLF
egg
mas
ses
Willow Pond (LS05)
Middle Pond (LS06)
Southern Pond (LS07)
Wetland Pond (LS08)
FIGURE 6-23. Restoration Manager, Christina Crooker, uses an antenna to locate radio collared frogs
FIGURE 6-24. NPS biologists Darren Fong and Susie Bennett measure a San Francisco garter snake.
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 56
Park Stewardship recorded incidental observations:
Three San Francisco garter snakes were observed in 2012.
Two San Francisco garter snakes were observed in 2013.
6.7 FUTURE PROJECTS AND RESOURCE NEEDS
This section highlights high priority projects that are not adequately addressed due to limitations in
staffing or funding.
6.7.1 Funding
Annual maintenance monies that funded restoration technicians, nursery work, and contract
projects were exhausted in July 2012. While volunteers support a portion of weed control, many
projects require more technical expertise for completion. This presents a challenge to continuing
weed control and revegetation maintenance at Mori Point.
6.7.2 Trails
Three trail segments were identified as being important in the Visitor Use Study and are detailed
below.
6.7.2.1 Bluff trail
This is one of the most popular yet least safe
trails at Mori Point. Funds should be secured
to develop an alternative trail that provides
the same coastal views and is safe and
structurally sound. Realignment of this trail
has already been analyzed and funds should
be sought for implementation.
6.7.2.2 Headlands trail
This trail along the Point is popular among all
FIGURE 6-26. The Bluff Trail along the coastline is among the most popular yet least safe trail at Mori Point.
FIGURE 6-25. Mori Point. San Francisco garter snake.
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 57
user groups including off-leash dog walkers.
The Point is also the most visited destination
spot at Mori Point. Although degraded and
compacted due to prior mining operations
and motorcycle racing, it houses the
spectacular wildflower displays that make
Mori Point beloved by so many. Long-time
visitors regularly express concern about a
decrease in wildflowers at the Point. With an
increase in overall visitation to Mori Point due
to trail and habitat improvements, the Point
is subject to more trampling than ever before.
It will be prudent to establish a trail system
that guides visitor use along one main trail rather than along several social trails, and attempt to
revegetate barren areas with native wildflowers. Experimental plots to revegetate this area have
been successful, increasing the viability of limiting visitor access while restoring barren areas.
6.7.2.3 Southern access routes
Three trails currently provide access to Mori Point from private lands to the south. The most
popular of these was the connector trail between the Coastal Trail and Calera Creek. Careful
consideration of access points and the popularity of these points should be undertaken when the
next phase of trail construction is initiated.
6.7.2.4 Upper Mori trailhead
The main entrance to Mori Point is the access
point to the Upper Mori Trail. This study
showed that this trailhead is poorly used. The
trailhead and the trail should be upgraded to
make the entryway more desirable. Habitat
traversed by the Upper Mori Trail is also in need
of restoration.
6.7.3 Revegetation
A revegetation strategy for coastal bluff
wildflowers should be drafted in conjunction
with a trail plan. The vegetation strategy should draw from the results of the direct seeding
experiments already conducted at Mori Point.
FIGURE 6-27. The Headlands trail leads to the Point, a popular destination spot given the ocean view and wildflower displays.
FIGURE 6-28. Main entrance to Mori Point from the access point at the Upper Mori Trail.
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 58
6.7.4 Outreach
A strategy to educate the neighboring public about the risks of having domestic cats in the park
should be initiated.
6.7.5 Invasive Species
A management plan for Cape ivy should be developed that identifies the location of containment
lines and eradication areas.
Fennel should be targeted throughout Mori Point, especially along the Timigtac trail.
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 59
7. SUMMARY
San Bruno elfin larva at Milagra Ridge
The Park Stewardship Program has collectively made great strides in rehabilitating key landscapes and
working to restore populations of sensitive species that depend on the park’s natural communities.
Our work spans invasive species control, sensitive species monitoring and recovery, revegetation, field
experiments, trail construction and maintenance, long-term habitat and project monitoring, mapping,
and data management.
Although volunteerism continues to be one key element in restoring and maintaining these restoration
sites, many restoration actions are either too technical, too large, or are in environments too challenging
for community volunteers.
As such, a healthy level of ongoing base funding for restoration technicians and experienced
contractors is critical to ensure long-term protection of these important parklands.
Our goal in the year ahead is to prioritize these critical restoration actions (that are not volunteer
friendly) and begin the process of acquiring funding and resources to ensure that currently unmet needs
can be addressed in the years to come.
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 60
APPENDIX 1. Invasive Vegetation Removal Comparison Maps
2006-2013
Oakwood Valley (p. 61 – 98)
Wolfback Ridge (p. 99 – 107)
Milagra Ridge (p. 108 - 136)
Mori Point (p. 137 -
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 61
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 62
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 63
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 64
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 65
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 66
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 67
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 68
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 69
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 70
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 71
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 72
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 73
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 74
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 75
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 76
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 77
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 78
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 79
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 80
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 81
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 82
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 83
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 84
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 85
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 86
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 87
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 88
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 89
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 90
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 91
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 92
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 93
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 94
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 95
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 96
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 97
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 98
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 99
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 100
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 101
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 102
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 103
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 104
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 105
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 106
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 107
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 108
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 109
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 110
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 111
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 112
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 113
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 114
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 115
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 116
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 117
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 118
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 119
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 120
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 121
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 122
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 123
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 124
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 125
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 126
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 127
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 128
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 129
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 130
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 131
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 132
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 133
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 134
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 135
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 136
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 137
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 138
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 139
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 140
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 141
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 142
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 143
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 144
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 145
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 146
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 147
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 148
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 149
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 150
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 151
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 152
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 153
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 154
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 155
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 156
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 157
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 158
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 159
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 160
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 161
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 162
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 163
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 164
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 165
FY 2012 and FY 2013 Annual Restoration Report 166
Appendix 2: Reports Referenced in this Document
Oakwood Valley Restoration Project Progress Report 2012
Oakwood Valley Restoration Report Phase 2 Progress Report 2013
Oak Coyote brush survivorship with different mulching methods at EUGL 6, Oakwood Valley
Coyote brush survivorship with different mulching methods at Pacheco subsite, Oakwood Valley
Survivorship of Quercus agrifolia, Oak Rehabilitation Project and Oakwood Valley Restoration
Project Progress Report 2012
FINAL REPORT, 2012 Mission Blue Butterfly Survey, Oakwood Valley
FINAL REPORT, 2013 Mission Blue Butterfly Survey, Oakwood Valley
Project: Mission Blue January – August 2012 Report
Project: Mission Blue May – December 2011 Report
Interim Management Plan for Invasive Species Control, Connemara Conservation Easement
Dedication and Development Project
Milagra Ridge Test Plots for Ox-eye Daisy Removal
Bermuda Buttercup (Oxalis pes-caprae) Control Study at Milagra Ridge
See Test Plots for Purple Velvet Grass (Holcus lanatus) Removal
Final Report, 2012 Mission Blue Butterfly Survey, Milagra Ridge
Final Report, 2013 Mission Blue Butterfly Survey, Milagra Ridge
Literature review for Colletotrichum lupini for details.
Final Report, 2012 San Bruno Elfin Butterfly Survey, Milagra Ridge
Final Report, 2013 San Bruno Elfin Butterfly Survey, Milagra Ridge
Mapping species distribution of Cape ivy (Delairea odorata) in Mori Point National Recreation Area:
Implications for resource management and conservation planning
Mori Point Restoration and Trail Plan Revegetation Report 2007-2012
Restoration Success at Mori Point
Memorandum: Mori Point – Direct Seeding the Point
Memorandum, 2013 Mori Point Direct Seeding
Mori Point Post-Implementation Visitor Use Report, Assessing the effectiveness of the new Mori
Point trail system in reducing off -trail effects to sensitive habitats for details
Effects of Feral and Domestic Cats at Mori Point
Final Report 2013 California Red- legged frog survey, Mori Point