panel discussion 6 2 - mhlw.go.jp...panel discussion 6 yutaka horie, mba, phd deputy assistant...
TRANSCRIPT
1
Future Cooperation with and among ASEAN countries for the Aging Population
The 11th ASEAN & Japan High Level Officials Meeting on Caring Societies
Panel Discussion 6
Yutaka Horie, MBA, PhDDeputy Assistant Minister for International Affairs,
Minister's Secretariat, Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Government of Japan
2
Lesson Learned
&What to do
3
Lesson Learned① UHC as a basis for “Active Aging”, Medical
and Welfare services, Health Promotion, and Diseases Prevention.
② Local Communities that Support the Elderly③ Social Involvement and Contribution by the
Elderly: Social Participation④ The roles of the Government in “Active
Aging”
4
What to do next ?
5
Active Aging
6
5W1H• Why• Who• When• Where• What• How
7
Why
Active Aging is Challenge?
8
●Declining Working Generation
●Urbanization with declining Community
strength
●Dominating NCD over infections disease
9
Who
Aging rate1990(60+)(%)1)
Aging rate2010(60+)(%)1)
Prospect of aging
rate2025 (60+)(%)1)
Prospect of aging
rate2050(60+)(%)1)
Total fertility rate1)
Life expectancy at birth 1)
Labor-force participation ratio(60-64year-old)2)
Per capita GDP
(US$)3)
Income disparity(Richest 10% to poorest 10%)4)
Male Female Male Female
Japan 17.4 30.5 35.5 41.5 1.32 79.3 86.1 76.0 45.7 45,903 4.5
Republic of Korea 7.7 15.7 27.2 38.9 1.29 76.5 83.3 70.2 41.5 22,424 7.8
Singapore 8.4 14.0 27.1 37.8 1.25 78.5 82.7 67.5 35.4 46,241 17.7
Thailand 7.3 12.9 21.3 31.8 1.63 70.2 77.1 50.1(60-)
29.5(60-)
4,972 12.6
China 8.9 12.3 20.2 33.9 1.64 71.1 74.5 58.3 40.6 5,445 21.6
Vietnam 7.3 8.4 15.3 30.8 1.89 72.3 76.2 69.4 58.2 1,407 6.9
Indonesia 6.1 8.2 13.2 25.5 2.19 66.3 69.4 78.9 47.3 3,495 7.8
Malaysia 5.6 7.7 13.1 20.4 2.72 71.2 75.7 52.3 17.1 9,977 22.1
Myanmar 7.0 7.9 13.0 24.5 2.08 62.1 65.0 - - 880 -
Brunei Darussalam 4.4 5.7 12.1 23.1 2.11 75.3 80.0 45.5 11.2 40,301 -
Cambodia 4.5 6.2 9.5 19.0 2.80 60.2 62.6 69.5 33.0 897 12.2
Philippines 4.7 5.7 8.9 15.3 3.27 64.5 71.3 79.0(55-64)
54.8(55-64)
2,370 15.5
Lao PDR 5.7 5.9 8.4 18.9 3.02 64.8 67.3 - - 1,320 8.3
Source 1) UN: World Population Prospects: The 2010 Revision Population Database2) Statistical data of respective countries. 3) World Bank Search 2011 (Myanmar ; National Accounts Estimates of Main Aggregates, 2010, United Nations Statistics Division)4) Human Development Report 2007/2008:Published for the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) 10
Comparison of Aging-Related Indicators (ASEAN+3)
2013.6.14厚生労働省第1回「国際的なActive Agingにおける日本の貢献に関する検討会」
Percentage of total deaths by broad age group (both sexes)Country 0-4 0-14 0-19 15-59 15-64 40+ 50+ 60+ 70+ 80+ 90+
Japan 1950-1955 19.8 23.0 24.9 31.2 38.6 63.4 56.5 45.8 29.1 9.5 0.9Japan 1960-1965 7.9 9.4 10.6 26.9 35.7 81.3 75.4 63.8 43.9 17.9 2.0Japan 0.4 0.5 0.6 10.5 16.2 97.6 95.3 89.0 76.1 51.5 18.5
Singapore 0.7 1.0 1.3 21.1 29.1 95.5 89.9 77.8 60.3 33.8 8.9Malaysia 2.5 3.6 5.0 31.5 40.5 86.2 78.1 64.9 45.2 19.5 2.7Viet Nam 7.0 8.5 9.9 29.2 34.4 80.7 73.0 62.3 50.3 29.6 9.5Thailand 2.5 3.9 5.1 35.9 42.9 83.7 73.6 60.2 44.6 22.3 4.9Brunei Darussalam 4.1 5.4 6.5 35.3 42.4 84.3 73.8 59.3 44.2 21.4 4.1Indonesia 12.1 13.8 15.1 29.1 36.7 76.1 68.6 57.0 40.1 18.0 2.2Myanmar 15.3 17.8 19.7 33.8 40.4 68.4 60.1 48.5 33.9 14.1 1.7Philippines 13.1 15.4 17.1 38.1 46.2 71.1 61.1 46.4 29.7 12.5 1.8Lao People's Democratic Republic24.8 28.4 30.9 28.5 34.4 58.5 52.2 43.1 29.9 12.4 1.5Cambodia 26.4 33.0 36.3 35.7 40.3 49.7 40.5 31.3 21.8 11.0 3.0
Republic of Korea 1.1 1.5 1.8 20.8 27.6 94.4 87.9 77.7 61.2 32.6 7.1China 4.2 4.8 5.6 22.3 29.4 88.6 83.0 73.0 56.0 27.6 5.6
Percentage of Deaths by Age Groups (ASEAN+3)
Sorted by the "shares of deaths 60+" Period: 2005-2010UN World Population Prospects: The 2012 Revision
Yutaka HORIE, MBA, PhDASEAN-Japan Seminar, The Regional Cooperation for the Aging Society11th November, 2013 11
12
When
Target Countries
Rapid Aging2025 aging rate ≧20%(60+)(2010→2025)
Moderate Aging10% ≦2025 aging rate < 20% (60+)(2010→2025)
Young2025 aging rate < 10%(60+)
(2010→2025)
High Income CountryGDP per Capita: >10,000$
Japan(30.5%→35.5%)
Singapore(14.0%→27.1%)Republic of Korea(15.7%→27.2%)
Brunei Darussalam(5.7%→12.1%)
Middle Income CountryGDP per Capita: >1,000$
Thailand(12.9%→21.3%)China(12.3%→20.2%)
Malaysia(7.7%→13.1%)
Indonesia(8.2→13.2%)
Vietnam(8.4%→15.3%)
Philippines(5.7%→8.9%)Lao PDR(5.9%→8.4%)
Low Income CountryGDP per Capita: <1,000$
Myanmar(7.9%→13.0%) Cambodia(6.2%→9.5%)
Source ・UN: World Population Prospects: The 2010 Revision Population Database・ World Bank Search 2011 (Myanmar ; National Accounts Estimates of Main Aggregates, 2010,
United Nations Statistics Division)
13
2013.6.14厚生労働省第1回「国際的なActive Agingにおける日本の貢献に関する検討会」
14
Where
15
●Urban area → Social isolation and economic
gap are more evident.
●Rural area → Scarce working generation tends
to weaker community strength.
16
What
Cooperation Interface on Active Aging between Japan and ASEAN countries
Health
Participation
Security
・Empowering Community Strength・Elderly Club Activities・Volunteer Network・Income Generation・Expanding Elderly Employment
・UHC (accessible and sustainable health system)・Income Security (public pension)・Long Term Care Insurance・Human Rights
・Service Standards and Regulation・Qualified Human Resources・Health Promotion Activities for NCD prevention・Expanding Home Care Services・Government Commitments to Securing Services
Japan Japan
ASEAN Japan
Active Aging KnowledgeExperience
KnowledgeExperience
ASEAN ASEAN
17
KnowledgeExperience
2013.10.30厚生労働省第3回「国際的なActive Agingにおける日本の貢献に関する検討会」
18
How
Study Group for Japan's International Contribution to Active Aging
19Development of “User-oriented ” Cooperation
JapanSide
ASEANSide
Solution (≒ Project )
Problem IdentificationAnalyzing advantages and challenges in ASEAN countries on Elderly care・Health and Welfare services・Poverty and Income Gap・Difference of Urban and Rural area
Portfolio of Japan’s Experience
Identifying appropriate solution for ASEAN countries from the viewpoint of utilizing both their potential strength and Japanese experiences.
Strategy Setting
Identification ofProblems and Solutions
Framework for International Cooperation・Bilateral Approach・Regional/ Global Approach・Industry-academia-government Collaboration・Open Discussion Forum
Cooperation Approach for Government policies Measures for the development of elderly care/ policy・Model projects and System development・Capacity Development・Technical Support for Policy making
Priority Setting
Reorganizing knowledge and experience applicable to Asia・Historical Development・Community based health and welfare activities・Human Resource Development e.g. Caregivers training
Chair: Dr. SHIGERU OMIRegional Director Emeritus, World Health Organization for Western Pacific
2013.6.14厚生労働省第1回「国際的なActive Agingにおける日本の貢献に関する検討会」
ASEAN-Japan SeminarThe Regional Cooperation for the Aging Society
20
Date : 9:30am-12:00am On 11th November,2013Venue: ASEAN Hall, the ASEAN SecretariatOpening Remarks :1. H. E. Kimihiro Ishikane, Ambassador of Japan to ASEAN2. Mr. Karry Maramis, Director for Cross-Sectoral Cooperation, ASEAN Socio-Cultural
Community Department, ASEAN Secretariat
Guest Main Speakers :1. Dr. Yutaka HORIE, Deputy Assistant Minister, Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of Japan, “Current status of population aging in Asia and a future direction of international cooperation on ‘Active Aging’”2. Dr. Chanvit TARATHEP, Deputy Permanent Secretary, Ministry of Public Health of Thailand , “Aging Society in Thailand”3. Dr. Mu’man NURYANA, Expert Staff on Social Impact Affairs, Ministry of Social Affairs of the Republic of Indonesia, “Inter-generational support flows and its implication to social policy toward active aging in Indonesia”4. Dr. Dwini HANDAYANI, Associate Director, Demographic Institute, University of Indonesia,“The best practice of social welfare policy in ASEAN region, in the context of Indonesia’s situation and future direction”
Outcome :The seminar overviewed the current situation of aging society in Asia, introduced on-going cooperative activities between ASEAN countries and Japan on this issue, and discussed further regional cooperation utilizing portfolio of experience and knowledge in those countries to address aging society and to achieve “Active Aging.”
International Cooperation in the field of the Elderly Persons between Thailand and Japan
Project on the Development of a Community Based Integrated Health
Care and Social Welfare Services Model for Thai Older Persons (CTOP)
(Nov. 2007~ Nov. 2011)
Health and welfare community-based service models were developed at 4 project sites in accordance with the needs of the sites, for example, 1) One-stop service such as
health-check and welfare registration for the elderly people
2) Community rehabilitation3) Prevention activities of high
blood pressureOwnership of the communities was strengthened based on “user-oriented principles”.Guideline of developed services was disseminated nation-wide.
Project on Long-term Care Service Development for the Frail Elderly
and Other Vulnerable People (LTOP)(Jan. 2013~Aug. 2017)
Thai Service models of long-term care will be developed, taking Japanese models into consideration. Service models will be tested both in urban and rural areas and improved.Policy development of the sustainable care system in Thai society will be discussed.Human resource development will support the to-be developed models.
21
(ref)
2013.10.30厚生労働省第3回「国際的なActive Agingにおける日本の貢献に関する検討会」
Aging issues in ASEAN countries and Japan’s possible contributions
22
Issues in ASEAN countries Japan’s possible contributions
Health
Facility services Secure the quality of services for the middle-income classStandardize facility servicesDevelop facility services to rural areas
A variety of facility services developedPast achievements in standardization (facility standards), “zero” body restraint and elder abuse prevention at three types of long-term care insurance facilitiesRoles of facilities in the integrated community care system
Home services Draw up a strategic roadmap towards development of home servicesDevelop and improve technical skills for each home services
History of service development (e.g. Gold Plan)Development of various home services and staff trainingEstablishment of integrated community care systems
Measures against NCDs
Study and develop specific intervention schemesDevelop action plans and utilize statistic data
Initiatives of annual health-check and intervention for lifestyle improvement
Participation
Social participation
Promote initiatives by utilizing existing social capitalIdentify the fragile elderly who may not be able to participate in the elderly clubs
Local residents’ activities organized at a small sizeBasic checklist to identify the fragile (risky) elderlyLocal initiatives for the integrated community care system
Measures for employment and livelihood
Encourage the elderly to actively participate in activities in order to secure caring resources in local communities
Employment of the elderly through “silver human resource centers”Initiatives by local communities based on the elderly resourcesExtension of retirement age
Security
Health security program
Extend health programs to the informal sectorSecure sustainable financingEstablish basic health services
Establishment and management of the universal health systemA variety of reforms for sustainable health systemFree access and expansion of health services
Income security for the elderly
Improve the coverageImprove the take-up rate and manage expenditures (e.g. old-age welfare allowance)Improve the saving ratio
Universal public pensionUniversal income security program for the elderly (e.g. public assistance, old-age welfare allowance)Variety of financial instruments, saving programs
23
Thailand
●Why: Rapid Aging with declining community strength
●Who: Thailand●When: 2007-2017●Where: Community●What: 1 Problem Finding
2 Care Model●How: JICA Project
24
• Why• Who• When• Where• What• How
User-Oriented