pacific university architecture katie kozarek engineeringchristian heimple constructiondebbie sit...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Pacific University Architecture Katie Kozarek EngineeringChristian Heimple ConstructionDebbie Sit ApprenticeChristina Cho OwnerPeter Demian School of Engineering](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649e215503460f94b0d817/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Pacific University
Architecture Katie Kozarek
Engineering Christian Heimple
Construction Debbie Sit
Apprentice Christina Cho
Owner Peter Demian
School of Engineering – New Construction Design Alternatives
![Page 2: Pacific University Architecture Katie Kozarek EngineeringChristian Heimple ConstructionDebbie Sit ApprenticeChristina Cho OwnerPeter Demian School of Engineering](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649e215503460f94b0d817/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Presentation Outline:
General Project Information & Introduction Discipline Constraints & Goals Alternative 1-4 by Discipline Decision Matrix (Pros/Cons of each Alternative) Team Process – Iteration Examples Team Dynamics Conclusion
CCAA
EE
![Page 3: Pacific University Architecture Katie Kozarek EngineeringChristian Heimple ConstructionDebbie Sit ApprenticeChristina Cho OwnerPeter Demian School of Engineering](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649e215503460f94b0d817/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Pacific Team & Project Information
Engineering School of Pacific University in Oregon
Location: Beautiful valley site near Pacific Ocean “Sunny Pond” of about 3000 sq.ft.
Preservation of existing footprint10,000 sq.ft. per story (3)
60% assignable CCAA
EE
![Page 4: Pacific University Architecture Katie Kozarek EngineeringChristian Heimple ConstructionDebbie Sit ApprenticeChristina Cho OwnerPeter Demian School of Engineering](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649e215503460f94b0d817/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Project Constraints
Total Budget: PV = $4.1 millionStructural System Budget: $330,000Completion Time: 1 year, by September
30, 2012Occupancy for Lab Facility: May 1, 2012Soil Condition: Rippable Rock
![Page 5: Pacific University Architecture Katie Kozarek EngineeringChristian Heimple ConstructionDebbie Sit ApprenticeChristina Cho OwnerPeter Demian School of Engineering](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649e215503460f94b0d817/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Design Considerations:
Rebuild a 3-story building for classroom, lab, office, and auditorium
Design a facility for innovative courses taking a team approach to engineering design
Put forth creative ideas considering: Architectural sense of place Functional use by occupants
Listen to team members knowledge-based notifications to design issues
![Page 6: Pacific University Architecture Katie Kozarek EngineeringChristian Heimple ConstructionDebbie Sit ApprenticeChristina Cho OwnerPeter Demian School of Engineering](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649e215503460f94b0d817/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Topography map Topography map
Oregon coast Site considerations:
•Small community
•Steep topography
•Cliffs
•Sparse highway system
![Page 7: Pacific University Architecture Katie Kozarek EngineeringChristian Heimple ConstructionDebbie Sit ApprenticeChristina Cho OwnerPeter Demian School of Engineering](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649e215503460f94b0d817/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Site map Site map
Small campus
Nearby pond
Overlooking cliff
![Page 8: Pacific University Architecture Katie Kozarek EngineeringChristian Heimple ConstructionDebbie Sit ApprenticeChristina Cho OwnerPeter Demian School of Engineering](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649e215503460f94b0d817/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Site photographsSite photographs
Considerations:
Cliff & Pond
![Page 9: Pacific University Architecture Katie Kozarek EngineeringChristian Heimple ConstructionDebbie Sit ApprenticeChristina Cho OwnerPeter Demian School of Engineering](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649e215503460f94b0d817/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Campus buildingsCampus buildingsNote:
Brick skin & Rectilinear forms
![Page 10: Pacific University Architecture Katie Kozarek EngineeringChristian Heimple ConstructionDebbie Sit ApprenticeChristina Cho OwnerPeter Demian School of Engineering](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649e215503460f94b0d817/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Structural Engineering – Requirements & Conditions
System Requirements Steel or concrete frame Cast-in-place, post-tensioned, or precast concrete
slab
Geometric Requirements Height of structure limited to 30’ Footprint of structure limited to existing
footprints
Pacific University – School of Engineering
![Page 11: Pacific University Architecture Katie Kozarek EngineeringChristian Heimple ConstructionDebbie Sit ApprenticeChristina Cho OwnerPeter Demian School of Engineering](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649e215503460f94b0d817/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Structural Engineering – Load Considerations Live Loads
Terrace, Atrium, Storage, & Stairwells – 100 psf Corridors – 80 psf Auditorium & Lobby – 60 psf Classrooms & Offices – 50 psf Roof – 20 psf
Dead Loads Lightweight concrete floor – 60 psf Metal deck – 5 psf Flooring, ceiling, lights – 12 psf Ductwork – 5 psf Partitions – 20 psf Exterior Cladding – 30 psf
Pacific University – School of Engineering
![Page 12: Pacific University Architecture Katie Kozarek EngineeringChristian Heimple ConstructionDebbie Sit ApprenticeChristina Cho OwnerPeter Demian School of Engineering](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649e215503460f94b0d817/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Structural Engineering – Load Considerations
Seismic Considerations Moderate to high seismic activity; Zone 3 Occupancy category, I = 1.0 Rock subsurface
Wind Considerations Design wind speed, V33 = 85 mph (38m/s)
Pacific University – School of Engineering
![Page 13: Pacific University Architecture Katie Kozarek EngineeringChristian Heimple ConstructionDebbie Sit ApprenticeChristina Cho OwnerPeter Demian School of Engineering](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649e215503460f94b0d817/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Equipment
Track-type Tractor
Ripper
Hydraulic Crane
![Page 14: Pacific University Architecture Katie Kozarek EngineeringChristian Heimple ConstructionDebbie Sit ApprenticeChristina Cho OwnerPeter Demian School of Engineering](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649e215503460f94b0d817/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Site Plan: L-shape
Material LaydownMaterial Storage
Office Trailer
Crane
Temporary Road Access
Main Road Access
Site Main Entrance
Optional Site Entrance
Site Boundary
![Page 15: Pacific University Architecture Katie Kozarek EngineeringChristian Heimple ConstructionDebbie Sit ApprenticeChristina Cho OwnerPeter Demian School of Engineering](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649e215503460f94b0d817/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Site Plan: Double Square
Material LaydownMaterial StorageOffice Trailer
CraneMain Site Entrance
Site Boundary
Optional Site Entrance
![Page 16: Pacific University Architecture Katie Kozarek EngineeringChristian Heimple ConstructionDebbie Sit ApprenticeChristina Cho OwnerPeter Demian School of Engineering](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649e215503460f94b0d817/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Alternative 1 - ArchitectureAlternative 1 - Architecture
Previous drawings restructured by engineer: Architectural redesign in Alternative 2
![Page 17: Pacific University Architecture Katie Kozarek EngineeringChristian Heimple ConstructionDebbie Sit ApprenticeChristina Cho OwnerPeter Demian School of Engineering](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649e215503460f94b0d817/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Alternative 1Alternative 1Previous Section & Elevation
![Page 18: Pacific University Architecture Katie Kozarek EngineeringChristian Heimple ConstructionDebbie Sit ApprenticeChristina Cho OwnerPeter Demian School of Engineering](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649e215503460f94b0d817/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Alternative 1 – Option 1 Structural Proposal
Pacific University – School of Engineering
Steel moment resisting frame Composite concrete/steel deck (t = 4.5”)
![Page 19: Pacific University Architecture Katie Kozarek EngineeringChristian Heimple ConstructionDebbie Sit ApprenticeChristina Cho OwnerPeter Demian School of Engineering](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649e215503460f94b0d817/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Alternative 1 – Option 1 Structural Proposal
First Floor Plan
Pacific University – School of Engineering
Third Floor Plan
Outdoor TerraceLaboratory
![Page 20: Pacific University Architecture Katie Kozarek EngineeringChristian Heimple ConstructionDebbie Sit ApprenticeChristina Cho OwnerPeter Demian School of Engineering](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649e215503460f94b0d817/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Alternative 1 – Option 1 Structural Proposal
Second Floor Structural Plan
Pacific University – School of Engineering
W12x45
W14x61
6x6 tube
Third Floor Structural Plan
![Page 21: Pacific University Architecture Katie Kozarek EngineeringChristian Heimple ConstructionDebbie Sit ApprenticeChristina Cho OwnerPeter Demian School of Engineering](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649e215503460f94b0d817/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Roof StructurePacific University – School of Engineering
Alternative 1 – Option 1 Structural Proposal
![Page 22: Pacific University Architecture Katie Kozarek EngineeringChristian Heimple ConstructionDebbie Sit ApprenticeChristina Cho OwnerPeter Demian School of Engineering](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649e215503460f94b0d817/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Alternative 1 – Option 1 Structural Proposal
Roof Structure
Pacific University – School of Engineering
![Page 23: Pacific University Architecture Katie Kozarek EngineeringChristian Heimple ConstructionDebbie Sit ApprenticeChristina Cho OwnerPeter Demian School of Engineering](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649e215503460f94b0d817/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Alternative 1 – Option 1 Structural Proposal
Roof Structure
Pacific University – School of Engineering
![Page 24: Pacific University Architecture Katie Kozarek EngineeringChristian Heimple ConstructionDebbie Sit ApprenticeChristina Cho OwnerPeter Demian School of Engineering](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649e215503460f94b0d817/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Alternative 1 – Option 2 Structural Proposal
Pacific University – School of Engineering
Cast-in-place concrete frame and two-way concrete slab (t = 6”) Shear walls (t = 10”) Goal: To address cost cost concerns of CM regarding rotunda
![Page 25: Pacific University Architecture Katie Kozarek EngineeringChristian Heimple ConstructionDebbie Sit ApprenticeChristina Cho OwnerPeter Demian School of Engineering](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649e215503460f94b0d817/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Alternative 1 – Option 2 Structural Proposal
Second Floor Plan
Pacific University – School of Engineering
Third Floor Plan
Outdoor TerraceStorage
![Page 26: Pacific University Architecture Katie Kozarek EngineeringChristian Heimple ConstructionDebbie Sit ApprenticeChristina Cho OwnerPeter Demian School of Engineering](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649e215503460f94b0d817/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Alternative 1 – Option 2 Structural Proposal
Second Floor Structural Plan
Pacific University – School of Engineering
Foundation Plan Main columns have 5’x5’ spread
footings Rotunda has 10” drilled piles
10”x15”
10”x10”
Complex connection
![Page 27: Pacific University Architecture Katie Kozarek EngineeringChristian Heimple ConstructionDebbie Sit ApprenticeChristina Cho OwnerPeter Demian School of Engineering](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649e215503460f94b0d817/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Alternative 1 – Option 3 Structural Proposal
Eccentrically braced steel frame Composite steel/concrete deck (t = 4.5”) Goal: To address cost and constructability concerns of previous two
options
Pacific University – School of Engineering
![Page 28: Pacific University Architecture Katie Kozarek EngineeringChristian Heimple ConstructionDebbie Sit ApprenticeChristina Cho OwnerPeter Demian School of Engineering](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649e215503460f94b0d817/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Alternative 1 – Option 3 Structural Proposal
First Floor Plan
Pacific University – School of Engineering
Second Floor Plan
No conflicts with architecture
![Page 29: Pacific University Architecture Katie Kozarek EngineeringChristian Heimple ConstructionDebbie Sit ApprenticeChristina Cho OwnerPeter Demian School of Engineering](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649e215503460f94b0d817/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Alternative 1 – Option 3 Structural Proposal
Third Floor Structural Plan
Pacific University – School of Engineering
W12x45
W14x61
Second Floor Structural Plan
W14x61
Fewer columns than with original concept (A/E/C)
W12x45
![Page 30: Pacific University Architecture Katie Kozarek EngineeringChristian Heimple ConstructionDebbie Sit ApprenticeChristina Cho OwnerPeter Demian School of Engineering](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649e215503460f94b0d817/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Alternative 1 – Option 3 Structural Proposal
Gravity load distribution
Pacific University – School of Engineering
Lateral load distribution
![Page 31: Pacific University Architecture Katie Kozarek EngineeringChristian Heimple ConstructionDebbie Sit ApprenticeChristina Cho OwnerPeter Demian School of Engineering](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649e215503460f94b0d817/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Space frame: Construction Method Excavated cost for sunken auditorium (20,000 cy)
at about $400,000, ~10% of Total Cost Steel SMRF more labor-intensive then braced
frame; Concrete requires CIP
Alternative 1 – Construction Issues
![Page 32: Pacific University Architecture Katie Kozarek EngineeringChristian Heimple ConstructionDebbie Sit ApprenticeChristina Cho OwnerPeter Demian School of Engineering](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649e215503460f94b0d817/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Alternative 1: Option 3 Schedule & Estimate
Total: $3.8 Million
Structural: $420,000
![Page 33: Pacific University Architecture Katie Kozarek EngineeringChristian Heimple ConstructionDebbie Sit ApprenticeChristina Cho OwnerPeter Demian School of Engineering](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649e215503460f94b0d817/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Alternative 2 - PartiAlternative 2 - Parti
Parti:Redevelopment of last year’s idea
How can the design pattern laid above the space be incorporated and brought into the building?
Can circulation systems become the pattern?
Can the pattern be highlighted with structure?
Can the structure reflect the pattern’s form and in turn cause sunshadows to develop in the interior spaces?
![Page 34: Pacific University Architecture Katie Kozarek EngineeringChristian Heimple ConstructionDebbie Sit ApprenticeChristina Cho OwnerPeter Demian School of Engineering](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649e215503460f94b0d817/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Alternative 2 - PlansAlternative 2 - Plans
Initial plans
More Finalized plans
![Page 35: Pacific University Architecture Katie Kozarek EngineeringChristian Heimple ConstructionDebbie Sit ApprenticeChristina Cho OwnerPeter Demian School of Engineering](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649e215503460f94b0d817/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Alternative 2 – Model ViewsAlternative 2 – Model Views
Auditorium space underground
Pattern defined by structure and pathways
Structure filters and captures sunlight
![Page 36: Pacific University Architecture Katie Kozarek EngineeringChristian Heimple ConstructionDebbie Sit ApprenticeChristina Cho OwnerPeter Demian School of Engineering](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649e215503460f94b0d817/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Alternative 2Alternative 2
SectionSection through building bringing truss down through building above stairwells
Question to engineer? Can you make this a load bearing element in your structural considerations?
![Page 37: Pacific University Architecture Katie Kozarek EngineeringChristian Heimple ConstructionDebbie Sit ApprenticeChristina Cho OwnerPeter Demian School of Engineering](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649e215503460f94b0d817/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
Alternative 2 – Option 1 Structural Proposal
Eccentrically braced steel frame Composite steel/concrete deck (t = 4.5”) Basement auditorium (steel space frame or concrete dome roof) Goal: To meet architect’s challenge of a radial layout with the structure
integrated into the north building’s radial hallways
Pacific University – School of Engineering
![Page 38: Pacific University Architecture Katie Kozarek EngineeringChristian Heimple ConstructionDebbie Sit ApprenticeChristina Cho OwnerPeter Demian School of Engineering](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649e215503460f94b0d817/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
Alternative 2 – Option 1 Structural Proposal
Second Floor Structural Plan
Pacific University – School of Engineering
W12x45
W14x61
First Floor Plan
Laboratory
![Page 39: Pacific University Architecture Katie Kozarek EngineeringChristian Heimple ConstructionDebbie Sit ApprenticeChristina Cho OwnerPeter Demian School of Engineering](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649e215503460f94b0d817/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
Alternative 2 – Option 2 Structural Proposal
Special moment resisting steel frame Composite steel/concrete deck (t = 4.5”) Basement auditorium (steel space frame or concrete dome roof
with compression ring) Goal: To eliminate structural conflicts with architecture
Pacific University – School of Engineering
![Page 40: Pacific University Architecture Katie Kozarek EngineeringChristian Heimple ConstructionDebbie Sit ApprenticeChristina Cho OwnerPeter Demian School of Engineering](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649e215503460f94b0d817/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
Alternative 2 – Option 2 Structural Proposal
First Floor Plan
Pacific University – School of Engineering
W12x45
W14x61
Second Floor Structural Plan
No conflicts w/architecture
![Page 41: Pacific University Architecture Katie Kozarek EngineeringChristian Heimple ConstructionDebbie Sit ApprenticeChristina Cho OwnerPeter Demian School of Engineering](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649e215503460f94b0d817/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
Alternative 2 – Option 3 Structural Proposal
Steel frame with shear walls Composite steel/concrete deck (t = 4.5”) Basement auditorium (steel space frame or concrete dome roof
with compression ring) Goal: To explore a shear wall alternative
Pacific University – School of Engineering
![Page 42: Pacific University Architecture Katie Kozarek EngineeringChristian Heimple ConstructionDebbie Sit ApprenticeChristina Cho OwnerPeter Demian School of Engineering](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649e215503460f94b0d817/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
Alternative 2 – Option 3 Structural Proposal
Second Floor Structural Plan
Pacific University – School of Engineering
First Floor Plan
No conflicts w/architecture
![Page 43: Pacific University Architecture Katie Kozarek EngineeringChristian Heimple ConstructionDebbie Sit ApprenticeChristina Cho OwnerPeter Demian School of Engineering](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649e215503460f94b0d817/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
Alternative 2 – Option 4 Structural Proposal
North Building – visible braced frames along main corridors South Building – eccentrically braced frames on exterior walls Composite steel/concrete deck (t = 4.5”) Basement auditorium (steel space frame or concrete dome roof) Goal: To integrate functional braced frames into the north building’s
hallways
Pacific University – School of Engineering
![Page 44: Pacific University Architecture Katie Kozarek EngineeringChristian Heimple ConstructionDebbie Sit ApprenticeChristina Cho OwnerPeter Demian School of Engineering](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649e215503460f94b0d817/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
Alternative 2 – Option 4 Structural Proposal
Pacific University – School of Engineering
First Floor Plan
W12x45
W14x61
![Page 45: Pacific University Architecture Katie Kozarek EngineeringChristian Heimple ConstructionDebbie Sit ApprenticeChristina Cho OwnerPeter Demian School of Engineering](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649e215503460f94b0d817/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
Alternative 2 – Construction Issues
Building is separated into two parts:Cost Consideration for duplication of MEP systems
Connecting the two parts by 3rd floor skywalk: Potential savings: ~20% of total cost
Enclosed or Open Radial hallways: Life-cycle Costs
Constructability issues: Curved Walls & Angled Connections
![Page 46: Pacific University Architecture Katie Kozarek EngineeringChristian Heimple ConstructionDebbie Sit ApprenticeChristina Cho OwnerPeter Demian School of Engineering](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649e215503460f94b0d817/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
Milestone 1:Structural System Erected
Milestone 2:Building enclosed
Milestone 3:Project completion
Total: $6.0 Million
Structural: $590,000
MEP: $.2.2 Million
Alternative 2: Schedule & Estimate
![Page 47: Pacific University Architecture Katie Kozarek EngineeringChristian Heimple ConstructionDebbie Sit ApprenticeChristina Cho OwnerPeter Demian School of Engineering](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649e215503460f94b0d817/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
Alternative 2: Revised Estimate
MEP: $1.1Million
Structural:$400,000
Total: $4.2 Million
![Page 48: Pacific University Architecture Katie Kozarek EngineeringChristian Heimple ConstructionDebbie Sit ApprenticeChristina Cho OwnerPeter Demian School of Engineering](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649e215503460f94b0d817/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
parti sketches
Alternative 3Alternative 3
Organically growing plans and elevations moving out from footprint: representing natural growth of coastal habitat ; provisions for experimental growth
![Page 49: Pacific University Architecture Katie Kozarek EngineeringChristian Heimple ConstructionDebbie Sit ApprenticeChristina Cho OwnerPeter Demian School of Engineering](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649e215503460f94b0d817/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
Alternative 3: Puzzle ConceptAlternative 3: Puzzle Concept
Option 1 – First set of plans
![Page 50: Pacific University Architecture Katie Kozarek EngineeringChristian Heimple ConstructionDebbie Sit ApprenticeChristina Cho OwnerPeter Demian School of Engineering](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649e215503460f94b0d817/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
Alternative 3: Option 1Alternative 3: Option 1
Second set of plans: Changes include moving auditorium to first and second floor instead of excavation – consequential redesign of some interior spaces
![Page 51: Pacific University Architecture Katie Kozarek EngineeringChristian Heimple ConstructionDebbie Sit ApprenticeChristina Cho OwnerPeter Demian School of Engineering](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649e215503460f94b0d817/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
Alternative 3: Elevation
![Page 52: Pacific University Architecture Katie Kozarek EngineeringChristian Heimple ConstructionDebbie Sit ApprenticeChristina Cho OwnerPeter Demian School of Engineering](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649e215503460f94b0d817/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
Option 2 involves the L-shaped plan for the site
It is still working with the puzzle concept – showing its versatility
Alternative 3: Option 2
![Page 53: Pacific University Architecture Katie Kozarek EngineeringChristian Heimple ConstructionDebbie Sit ApprenticeChristina Cho OwnerPeter Demian School of Engineering](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649e215503460f94b0d817/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
Material selectionMaterial selection3 materials
5 blocksEach block has own material skin
Considered in construction and structural process
Computer block: brick to match surrounding buildings
Administration block : wood
Student block: wood
Auditorium: concrete
Classroom block: concrete
![Page 54: Pacific University Architecture Katie Kozarek EngineeringChristian Heimple ConstructionDebbie Sit ApprenticeChristina Cho OwnerPeter Demian School of Engineering](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649e215503460f94b0d817/html5/thumbnails/54.jpg)
Alternative 3: ModelAlternative 3: ModelSuggestions made to construction manager and engineer: think about how can we think of this design as being constructed in separate functional blocks? Can prefabrication be an option? Classroom block
Computer blockStudent blockFaculty blockAuditorium
PUZZLE PIECE AS INTERCONNECTING BLOCKS
![Page 55: Pacific University Architecture Katie Kozarek EngineeringChristian Heimple ConstructionDebbie Sit ApprenticeChristina Cho OwnerPeter Demian School of Engineering](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649e215503460f94b0d817/html5/thumbnails/55.jpg)
Alternative 3 - Interior examplesAlternative 3 - Interior examples
Isozaki/
Kurokawa
how can elements from puzzle concept enter into interior spaces?
![Page 56: Pacific University Architecture Katie Kozarek EngineeringChristian Heimple ConstructionDebbie Sit ApprenticeChristina Cho OwnerPeter Demian School of Engineering](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649e215503460f94b0d817/html5/thumbnails/56.jpg)
Alternative 3 - Exterior examples
Isozaki/
Kurokawa How can elements of form
create interesting spaces? Can structure be pushed into
stipulating form? Can functional blocks merge
to create a whole?
![Page 57: Pacific University Architecture Katie Kozarek EngineeringChristian Heimple ConstructionDebbie Sit ApprenticeChristina Cho OwnerPeter Demian School of Engineering](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649e215503460f94b0d817/html5/thumbnails/57.jpg)
Alternative 3 – Option 1 Structural Proposal
Pacific University – School of Engineering
Steel frame w/ shear walls (t = 8”) Composite steel/concrete deck (t = 4.5”)
![Page 58: Pacific University Architecture Katie Kozarek EngineeringChristian Heimple ConstructionDebbie Sit ApprenticeChristina Cho OwnerPeter Demian School of Engineering](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649e215503460f94b0d817/html5/thumbnails/58.jpg)
Alternative 3 – Option 1 Structural Proposal
First Floor Plan
Pacific University – School of Engineering
W14x90
W12x65
Second Floor Structural Plan
Instructional Laboratory
![Page 59: Pacific University Architecture Katie Kozarek EngineeringChristian Heimple ConstructionDebbie Sit ApprenticeChristina Cho OwnerPeter Demian School of Engineering](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649e215503460f94b0d817/html5/thumbnails/59.jpg)
Alternative 3 – Option 1 Structural Proposal
Cantilever Details
Pacific University – School of Engineering
Tube Section (6x6)
Tube Section (6x6)
![Page 60: Pacific University Architecture Katie Kozarek EngineeringChristian Heimple ConstructionDebbie Sit ApprenticeChristina Cho OwnerPeter Demian School of Engineering](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649e215503460f94b0d817/html5/thumbnails/60.jpg)
Alternative 3 – Option 2 Structural Proposal
Concrete frame w/ shear walls (t = 8”) C-I-P two-way beam supported slab (t = 5”) Post-tensioned cantilever beams and slab Goal: To explore concrete alternatives
Pacific University – School of Engineering
![Page 61: Pacific University Architecture Katie Kozarek EngineeringChristian Heimple ConstructionDebbie Sit ApprenticeChristina Cho OwnerPeter Demian School of Engineering](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649e215503460f94b0d817/html5/thumbnails/61.jpg)
Alternative 3 – Option 2 Structural Proposal
Second Floor Structural Plan
Pacific University – School of Engineering
Cantilever Details
![Page 62: Pacific University Architecture Katie Kozarek EngineeringChristian Heimple ConstructionDebbie Sit ApprenticeChristina Cho OwnerPeter Demian School of Engineering](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649e215503460f94b0d817/html5/thumbnails/62.jpg)
Alternative 3 – Option 3 Structural Proposal
Eccentrically braced steel frame Composite steel/concrete deck (t = 4.5”) Preferred option for Alternative 2 Goal: A cost and time efficient, constructible alternative
Pacific University – School of Engineering
![Page 63: Pacific University Architecture Katie Kozarek EngineeringChristian Heimple ConstructionDebbie Sit ApprenticeChristina Cho OwnerPeter Demian School of Engineering](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649e215503460f94b0d817/html5/thumbnails/63.jpg)
Alternative 3 – Option 3 Structural Proposal
First Floor Plan
Pacific University – School of Engineering
Moment frames used to integrate structure with architecture
![Page 64: Pacific University Architecture Katie Kozarek EngineeringChristian Heimple ConstructionDebbie Sit ApprenticeChristina Cho OwnerPeter Demian School of Engineering](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649e215503460f94b0d817/html5/thumbnails/64.jpg)
W12x45
W14x61
Alternative 3 – Option 3 Structural Proposal
Second Floor Structural Plan
Pacific University – School of Engineering
![Page 65: Pacific University Architecture Katie Kozarek EngineeringChristian Heimple ConstructionDebbie Sit ApprenticeChristina Cho OwnerPeter Demian School of Engineering](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649e215503460f94b0d817/html5/thumbnails/65.jpg)
Alternative 3
Computer Room & Instructional Lab located on different floors: Construction Sequence
Trailer rental costs $10,000 vs Late move-in penalty $37,500
Pre-cast concrete allows fast erection, yet relatively expensive for small-scale projects
![Page 66: Pacific University Architecture Katie Kozarek EngineeringChristian Heimple ConstructionDebbie Sit ApprenticeChristina Cho OwnerPeter Demian School of Engineering](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649e215503460f94b0d817/html5/thumbnails/66.jpg)
Alternative 3 - Option 3 Schedule & Estimate
Total: $4.0 Million
Structural: $460,000
![Page 67: Pacific University Architecture Katie Kozarek EngineeringChristian Heimple ConstructionDebbie Sit ApprenticeChristina Cho OwnerPeter Demian School of Engineering](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649e215503460f94b0d817/html5/thumbnails/67.jpg)
Alternative 4 - Architecture
CAD model sent by structural engineer…
![Page 68: Pacific University Architecture Katie Kozarek EngineeringChristian Heimple ConstructionDebbie Sit ApprenticeChristina Cho OwnerPeter Demian School of Engineering](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649e215503460f94b0d817/html5/thumbnails/68.jpg)
Alternative 4Breaking down massing to make for more usable interior spaces outside of auditorium
Working on unfolding building to consider spatial issues
![Page 69: Pacific University Architecture Katie Kozarek EngineeringChristian Heimple ConstructionDebbie Sit ApprenticeChristina Cho OwnerPeter Demian School of Engineering](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649e215503460f94b0d817/html5/thumbnails/69.jpg)
Alternative 4
Potential
for new
spaces
Creating circulation
![Page 70: Pacific University Architecture Katie Kozarek EngineeringChristian Heimple ConstructionDebbie Sit ApprenticeChristina Cho OwnerPeter Demian School of Engineering](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649e215503460f94b0d817/html5/thumbnails/70.jpg)
Alternative 4How can “floating column” be replaced to show load transfer?
• Conceptual plan – how can this form fit into the site? – needs to be broken down
![Page 71: Pacific University Architecture Katie Kozarek EngineeringChristian Heimple ConstructionDebbie Sit ApprenticeChristina Cho OwnerPeter Demian School of Engineering](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649e215503460f94b0d817/html5/thumbnails/71.jpg)
Alternative 4 – Option 1 Structural Proposal
60’ Cable-stayed cantilever over ocean-side cliff Composite steel/concrete deck with eccentrically
braced frame
Pacific University – School of Engineering
![Page 72: Pacific University Architecture Katie Kozarek EngineeringChristian Heimple ConstructionDebbie Sit ApprenticeChristina Cho OwnerPeter Demian School of Engineering](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649e215503460f94b0d817/html5/thumbnails/72.jpg)
Alternative 4 – Option 1 Structural Proposal
Structural Concept based on TWA hangar in Philadelphia and American hangar at San Francisco International
Design started with engineer to break out of A > E > C pattern and to overcome prior structural difficulties with previous alternatives
Pacific University – School of Engineering
![Page 73: Pacific University Architecture Katie Kozarek EngineeringChristian Heimple ConstructionDebbie Sit ApprenticeChristina Cho OwnerPeter Demian School of Engineering](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649e215503460f94b0d817/html5/thumbnails/73.jpg)
Alternative 4 – Option 1 Structural Proposal
Cantilevered portion of structure
Pacific University – School of Engineering
![Page 74: Pacific University Architecture Katie Kozarek EngineeringChristian Heimple ConstructionDebbie Sit ApprenticeChristina Cho OwnerPeter Demian School of Engineering](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649e215503460f94b0d817/html5/thumbnails/74.jpg)
Alternative 4 – Option 1 Structural Proposal
Pacific University – School of Engineering
Eccentrically braced steel frame Composite steel/concrete deck (t = 4.5”)
8x8 tube steel hanging columns
![Page 75: Pacific University Architecture Katie Kozarek EngineeringChristian Heimple ConstructionDebbie Sit ApprenticeChristina Cho OwnerPeter Demian School of Engineering](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649e215503460f94b0d817/html5/thumbnails/75.jpg)
Alternative 4 – Option 1 Structural Proposal
Third Floor Plan
Pacific University – School of Engineering
![Page 76: Pacific University Architecture Katie Kozarek EngineeringChristian Heimple ConstructionDebbie Sit ApprenticeChristina Cho OwnerPeter Demian School of Engineering](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649e215503460f94b0d817/html5/thumbnails/76.jpg)
Alternative 4 – Option 2 Structural Proposal
60’ Cable-stayed cantilever over ocean-side cliff Shear walls and post-tensioned slab (t = 5”) Cantilevered portions remain steel Goal: Reduce mast height and reflect architect’s
revisions
Pacific University – School of Engineering
![Page 77: Pacific University Architecture Katie Kozarek EngineeringChristian Heimple ConstructionDebbie Sit ApprenticeChristina Cho OwnerPeter Demian School of Engineering](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649e215503460f94b0d817/html5/thumbnails/77.jpg)
Alternative 4 – Option 3 Structural Proposal
Pacific University – School of Engineering
Northeast shoulder removed to accommodate footprint constraint
![Page 78: Pacific University Architecture Katie Kozarek EngineeringChristian Heimple ConstructionDebbie Sit ApprenticeChristina Cho OwnerPeter Demian School of Engineering](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649e215503460f94b0d817/html5/thumbnails/78.jpg)
Pacific University – School of Engineering
Footprint
2nd Floor Structural Plan
Alternative 4 – Option 3 Structural Proposal
![Page 79: Pacific University Architecture Katie Kozarek EngineeringChristian Heimple ConstructionDebbie Sit ApprenticeChristina Cho OwnerPeter Demian School of Engineering](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649e215503460f94b0d817/html5/thumbnails/79.jpg)
Alternative 4
Structurally very dynamic, yet repetition aids in cutting construction costs
Cable-stayed system requires deep pile foundation 2nd and 3rd floor cantilever hanging over cliff:
require temporary platform for efficient construction of the exterior wall
Design still young; construction input in structure/materials/method can possibly drive cost and schedule down
![Page 80: Pacific University Architecture Katie Kozarek EngineeringChristian Heimple ConstructionDebbie Sit ApprenticeChristina Cho OwnerPeter Demian School of Engineering](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649e215503460f94b0d817/html5/thumbnails/80.jpg)
Alternative 4: Schedule & Estimate
Total: $4.6 Million
Structural: $560,000
![Page 81: Pacific University Architecture Katie Kozarek EngineeringChristian Heimple ConstructionDebbie Sit ApprenticeChristina Cho OwnerPeter Demian School of Engineering](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649e215503460f94b0d817/html5/thumbnails/81.jpg)
Cost Comparisons
![Page 82: Pacific University Architecture Katie Kozarek EngineeringChristian Heimple ConstructionDebbie Sit ApprenticeChristina Cho OwnerPeter Demian School of Engineering](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649e215503460f94b0d817/html5/thumbnails/82.jpg)
Decision Matrix AEC
1
2
3
4
PROS CONS
•Dynamic, radial, curvilinear, sun pattern•Semi-regular bays sizes and layout•Easier to construct (regular layout, little welding)
•Most flexible puzzle piece parti•material-functional block relationships•Braced frames have dual purpose of “backing” cantilevers & lateral load support
•Most dynamic interior spaces (auditorium), sunpatterns, shadowplay•Structure integrated with architecture
•Design speaks to engineering and structure•Extremely interesting structural system•Regular structural patterns – many common components throughout
•Cantilevered walkway over atrium susceptible to vibration and imposes large moments in connecting column•Costly atrium space
•May not challenge engineer•Long cantilevers may be susceptible to vibration problems•No economies of scale with so many materials
•Circulation undeveloped•Very irregular layout resulting in a large number of angled connections •Expensive to construct (curved walls, angled connections)
•No relationship to site or context, lack of spatial variation creating architectural limitations•Exceeds height limit and footprint (under review)•Deep piles require lots of time & money, large overhanging portion
![Page 83: Pacific University Architecture Katie Kozarek EngineeringChristian Heimple ConstructionDebbie Sit ApprenticeChristina Cho OwnerPeter Demian School of Engineering](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649e215503460f94b0d817/html5/thumbnails/83.jpg)
Team Process – Iteration Examples Alternative 1 A->E->C->A->E->C
Predetermined, old architectural drawings redesigned
Alternative 2 A->E->C Developed architecturally but needs more structural and construction advice due to issues of
constructability
Alternative 3 A->E->C->E->A->C Redesign of Alternative 1 E&C advised architect against irregular, oblique layout
Expensive, angled connections A challenges E&C to integrate their systems into the architecture (e.g. exposed structural
system)
Alternative 4 E->A->C->A->E->C Design started with engineer
![Page 84: Pacific University Architecture Katie Kozarek EngineeringChristian Heimple ConstructionDebbie Sit ApprenticeChristina Cho OwnerPeter Demian School of Engineering](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649e215503460f94b0d817/html5/thumbnails/84.jpg)
Team Dynamics INTERACTION WITH OWNER:
Very understanding, sensitive, & informative b/c has engineering
Encouraging of ideas outside original scope
INTERACTION WITH TEAM: Initial lack of conceptual understanding of each
others’ fields and roles Challenge to meet new expectations for next semester
by being informative and understanding of different expectations and considerations in the design process
Challenge to be more communicative and outspoken during the design process
![Page 85: Pacific University Architecture Katie Kozarek EngineeringChristian Heimple ConstructionDebbie Sit ApprenticeChristina Cho OwnerPeter Demian School of Engineering](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649e215503460f94b0d817/html5/thumbnails/85.jpg)
Consideration of Alternative 4 Redesign as Final Solution:
CCAA
EE
Challenging Structural Design Feasible in Time and Cost for
Construction without current considerations for material
Architecturally lacks spatial concept and connection to context
![Page 86: Pacific University Architecture Katie Kozarek EngineeringChristian Heimple ConstructionDebbie Sit ApprenticeChristina Cho OwnerPeter Demian School of Engineering](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649e215503460f94b0d817/html5/thumbnails/86.jpg)
CONCLUSION
Considering a fifth alternative
that can challenge all fields equally
CCAA
EE