pacific earthquake engineering research...
TRANSCRIPT
PACIFIC EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERINGRESEARCH CENTER
PEER Annual Report 2017–2018
Khalid M. Mosalam
Amarnath Kasalanati
Selim Günay
Pacifi c Earthquake Engineering Research CenterUniversity of California, Berkeley
PEER Report No. 2018/01Pacifi c Earthquake Engineering Research Center
Headquarters at the University of California, Berkeley
June 2018PEER 2018/01
June 2018
Disclaimer
The opinions, fi ndings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily refl ect the views of the study sponsor(s) or the Pacifi c Earthquake Engineering Research Center.
PEER Annual Report 2017–2018
Khalid M. Mosalam
Amarnath Kasalanati
Selim Günay
Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center University of California, Berkeley
PEER Report No. 2018/01 Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center
Headquarters at the University of California, Berkeley
June 2018
ii
iii
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center (PEER) is a multi-institutional research and education center with headquarters at the University of California, Berkeley. PEER’s mission is to (1) develop, validate, and disseminate performance-based engineering (PBE) technologies for buildings and infrastructure networks subjected to earthquakes and other natural hazards, with the goal of achieving community resilience; and (2) equip the earthquake engineering and other extreme-event communities with the 21st-century tools that define the current digital revolution. This reports presents the activities of the Center over the period of July 1, 2017 to June 30, 2018. PEER staff, in particular Grace Kang, Erika Donald, Claire Johnson, Christina Bodnar-Anderson, and Zulema Lara, helped in preparation of this report.
Key activities of the past academic year include the following:
Continuation of major projects such as Tall Building Initiative (TBI) and Next Generation Attenuation (NGA) projects, and start of work on the major project funded by the California Earthquake Authority (CEA). The TBI was completed in 2017, and NGA projects are nearing completion soon.
Addition of University of Nevada, Reno (UNR) as a core institution.
Re-establishment of the PEER Research Committee.
Issuing a Request for Proposal (RFP) from TSRP funds and funding 17 projects as a result of this RFP. Together with the ongoing projects, the total number of projects funded in 2017 is 24.
Organization of several workshops focused on Liquefaction, Structural Health Monitoring (SHM), High-Performance Computing (HPC), Bridge Component Fragility Development, Physics-Based Ground Motions, Hybrid Simulation, and Research Needs for Resilient Buildings.
Rollout of TBI seminars and HayWired activities as part of outreach.
Conducting a blind prediction contest with robust participation and instructive findings on current modeling approaches.
Organization of the PEER Annual Meeting with participation of 240 attendees.
Continuing participation in board of directors of international organizations such as Global Alliance of Disaster Research Institutes (GADRI) and International Laboratory of Earthquake Engineering (ILEE).
Going forward, PEER aims to hold more focused workshops, form new committees, and draw on existing resources and experience on PBE to systematically move towards Resilient Design for Extreme Events (RDEE).
v
CONTENTS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................................................................... iii
TABLE OF CONTENTS ..............................................................................................................v
1 MISSION, VISION, AND ORGANIZATION ................................................................1
1.1 Mission ....................................................................................................................1
1.2 Vision .......................................................................................................................2
1.3 Future Goals ...........................................................................................................2
1.4 Organizational Structure ......................................................................................2
2 MAJOR RESEARCH PROJECTS ..................................................................................5
2.1 Transportation Systems Research Program (TSRP) ..........................................5
2.2 Lifelines Program ...................................................................................................6
2.3 Tsunami Research Program .................................................................................6
2.4 Seismic Performance of Retrofitted Homes ........................................................7
3 RESEARCH HIGHLIGHTS ............................................................................................9
3.1 Remediation of Liquefaction Effects on Embankments using Soil–Cement Reinforcements ........................................................................................9
3.2 Stochastic Modeling and Simulation of Near-Fault Ground Motions for Use in PBEE..........................................................................................................10
3.3 Resolution of Non-Convergence Issues in Seismic Response Analysis of Bridges ..................................................................................................................12
3.4 Testing and Hybrid Simulation of Environmentally Damaged Bridge Columns ................................................................................................................13
3.5 Towards Multi-Tier Modeling of Liquefaction Impacts on Transportation Infrastructure ............................................................................14
3.6 High-Performance Computing-Based Distributed Multi-Layered City-Scale Transportation Network Tool ...................................................................16
3.7 Implementation and Validation of PM4sand in OpenSees ..............................17
3.8 Modeling Bay Area Transportation Network Resilience .................................18
3.9 Liquefaction Triggering and Effects at Silty-Soil Sites ....................................19
3.10 Aftershock Seismic Vulnerability and Time-Dependent Risk Assessment of Bridges ..............................................................................................................20
3.11 Post-Earthquake Fire Performance of Industrial Facilities ............................22
vi
3.12 Dissipative Base Connections for Moment-Frame Structures in Airports and other Transportation Systems .....................................................................23
3.13 Tsunami Debris: Simulating Hazard and Loads ..............................................25
3.14 Influence of Vertical Ground Shaking on Design of Bridges Islolated with Friction Pendulum Bearings.......................................................................26
3.15 Development of a Database and a Toolbox for Regional Seismic Risk Assessment of California’s Highway Bridges ....................................................28
3.16 Accounting for Earthquake Duration in Performance-Based Evaluation and Design of Bridges (UNR-Stanford Collaboration).....................................29
3.17 Fluid–Structure Interaction and Python Scripting Capabilities in OpenSees ...............................................................................................................30
3.18 PEER Reports 2017 .............................................................................................31
4 EVENTS AND OUTREACH ACTIVITIES .................................................................43
4.1 PEER BIP Program .............................................................................................43
4.2 Summer 2017 Internship Program .....................................................................44
4.3 UNR becomes a New PEER Core Institution mEMBER .................................45
4.4 PEER Bridge Bent Blind Prediction Contest ....................................................45
4.5 PEER-TSRP Funds 6 Seed AND 11 Full Proposals .........................................46
4.6 PEER-USGS Workshop: HayWired and Building Codes ...............................47
4.7 2018 PEER Annual Meeting ...............................................................................47
4.8 GADRI Meeting, March 2018, PEER Participation.........................................48
4.9 Hybrid Simulation Workshop Hosted by PEER and MTS .............................49
4.10 French Delegation Visits PEER ..........................................................................50
4.11 PEER Hub Imagenet (PHI) Challenge ..............................................................51
4.12 HayWired Scenario Rollout: April 18, 2018 .....................................................52
4.13 PEER Participation at the 11NCEE, June, 2018 ..............................................53
4.14 PEER Seminars ....................................................................................................54
4.14.1 Structural Health Monitoring of Composite Structures: Application to Aeronautic Nacelles ...................................................................................54
4.14.2 Probabilistic Risk Assessment of Petrochemical Plants under Seismic Loading ......................................................................................................54
4.15 PEER Seminar: TBI Guideliines for Performance-Based Seismic Design of Tall Buildings Version 2.03 .............................................................................55
vii
5 TECHNOLOGY TOOLS AND RESOURCES.............................................................57
5.1 OpenSees ...............................................................................................................57
5.2 Databases ..............................................................................................................58
5.2.1 Structural Performance Database ...............................................................58
5.2.2 Seismic Performance Observatory (SPO) ..................................................58
5.3 NISEE / PEER Library .......................................................................................59
6 FACILITIES AND RESOURCES .................................................................................61
6.1 Key Personnel (Headquarters) ...........................................................................61
6.2 PEER Staff Research Engineers and Project Scientists ...................................62
6.3 Institutional Board ...............................................................................................62
6.4 Research Committee ............................................................................................64
6.5 PEER Laboratories at UC Berkeley ..................................................................65
6.5.1 Earthquake Simulator Laboratory ..............................................................65
6.5.2 Service-to-Industry ....................................................................................66
6.6 Faculty Participants .............................................................................................67
6.6.1 Faculty Participants (Core Institutions) .....................................................67
6.6.2 Faculty Participants (Affiliate Institutions and Outside Organizations) ....69
6.6.3 Industry Partners ........................................................................................70
7 IN MEMORIAM: STEPHEN A. MAHIN (1946–2018) ...............................................71
APPENDIX A LIST OF SUB-AWARD PROJECTS (PRIOR 5 YEARS) ..................75
viii
1
1 Mission, Vision, and Organization
1.1 MISSION
The Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center (PEER) is a multi-institutional research and education center with headquarters at the University of California, Berkeley. Investigators from over 20 universities and several consulting companies, in addition to researchers at various State and Federal government agencies, contribute to research programs focused on performance-based earthquake engineering (PBEE) in various disciplines, including structural and geotechnical engineering, geology/seismology, lifelines, transportation, risk management, and public policy.
In addition, PEER is an Organized Research Unit (ORU) under the College of Engineering at the University of California, Berkeley, which provides space for PEER offices and largely covers the salaries of PEER staff. In addition, the National Information Service for Earthquake Engineering (NISEE) library and the earthquake simulator and structural research laboratories located at the U.C. Berkeley campus’ Richmond Field Station are supported by PEER.
PEER’s mission is to (1) develop, validate, and disseminate performance-based engineering technologies for buildings and infrastructure networks subjected to earthquakes and other natural hazards, with the goal of achieving community resilience; and (2) equip the earthquake engineering and other extreme event communities with the 21st-century tools that define the current digital revolution. A key goal of PEER's research efforts is to define appropriate performance targets, and develop engineering tools and criteria that can be used by practicing professionals to achieve those targets, such as safety, cost, and post-earthquake functionality. In addition, PEER actively disseminates its findings to professionals who are involved in the practice of earthquake engineering, through various mechanisms including workshops, conferences, and the PEER Report Series. PEER also conducts Education and Outreach programs to reach students, policy makers, practitioners, and others interested in public policy and research related to earthquakes and the built environment.
The core institutions, their researchers and facilities, and educational affiliates are crucial components for realizing the Center’s mission and vision. The wide range of expertise among many researchers, unmatched capabilities of experimental facilities, and geographic spread of institutions make PEER a unique and impactful organization. Some of the most successful PEER projects have been multi-institution efforts with industry collaborations. In return, participating researchers benefit from the PEER infrastructure: access to well-maintained software and databases, dissemination of research through PEER reports, and regular communication efforts,
and transof succes
1.2 V
During thMosalam5 years. EarthquaThe new expansiobuilt envresilient PEER’s vEvents af
1.3 F
To movefollowing
Fgoals. InLiquefacBridge Cand Reseeffective actionablin the com
1.4 O
In additioResearch
sparent opposs.
VISION
he PEER Anm, PEER Dir
The Centeake Engineer
vision inclun from eart
vironment, adesign tha
vision is to bffecting the b
FUTURE GO
e towards theg broad goal
1. Contin
2. Adapt
3. Develsciencengine
4. Deplo
5. Continshapin
6. Identigoals.
ocused workn the past ytion, Struct
Component Fearch Needs way to brin
le research pming years t
ORGANIZA
on to being h Unit (ORU
ortunities an
nnual Meetinector, presener aims to ring (PBEE)udes two natthquake engand extensioat focuses be the thougbuilt environ
OALS
e goal of Rels for the nex
nue the fund
t PBE resear
lop the 21st cce-related teceering and o
oy resilient a
nue outreachng public po
ify and pursu
kshops haveyear, the Ctural HealthFragility Dev
for Resilienng together stplan. The Ceto achieve th
ATIONAL ST
a Multi-InstU) under the
d processes
ng held in Janted the Cen
extend the) to Resilienural extensio
gineering to on of the pon people,
ght leader in nment.
esilient Desigxt few years:
damental res
rch methodo
century toolschnologies, a
other extreme
and sustainab
h activities aolicy; and
ue new, large
e been identiCenter held h Monitorinvelopment, Pnt Buildingstakeholders,enter will fohe overall go
TRUCTUR
itutional Rese College of
2
for research
anuary 2018nter’s vision e current Pnt Design forons of the Cextreme ev
performancecommuniti
Resilient De
gn for Extre:
earch in the
logies and to
s, such as Hiand Artificiae event dom
ble design at
and expand th
e, and sustai
ified as an efworkshops
ng (SHM), Physics-Bas
s. PEER Ann, researchersorm several oal of RDEE
E
search and Ef Engineerin
h funding on
8, Professor Kfor the comerformance-r Extreme E
Center’s past vents affectine-based desiies, and reesign for Ex
eme Events,
field of eart
ools to other
igh-Performaal-Intelligen
mains;
t community
hem to playi
ined funding
ffective meaon a wide High-Perfo
sed Ground Mnual Meetins, and industcommittees .
Education Cng at Univer
n regular bas
Khalid ming 3–
-Based Events.
work: ng the ign to gions.
xtreme
the Center h
thquake engi
r domains of
ance Compuce (AI) tools
y and regiona
ing an advoc
g sources to a
ans of achievvariety of
ormance CoMotions, Hy
ngs have beetry partners fand hold va
Center, PEERrsity of Cali
Dire
sis with high
has identifie
ineering;
f extreme ev
uting (HPC),s for earthqu
al levels;
cacy role in
achieve thes
ving the Cenresearch to
omputing (Hybrid Simulaen found to bfor developinarious works
R is an Organifornia, Berk
ector Khalid Mosa
h rate
ed the
ents;
, data uake
se
nter’s opics: HPC), ation, be an ng an shops
nized keley.
alam
3
PEER has 12 full time staff members and several other Research Engineers, Project Scientists, and Graduate Student Researchers. An Institutional Board (IB), consisting of one representative from each of the core institutions, provides policy level guidance and oversight to the Center. The Research Committee (RC), consisting of industry and academic members, advises the Center in pursuing new research.
Organizational structure of PEER is shown here for the period of July 1, 2017 through June 30, 2018. More details of PEER’s key personnel, IB members, RC members and PEER resources are presented in Section 6 of the report.
College of Engineering Dean Shankar Sastry
PEER Associate Director Amarnath Kasalanati
Associate Dean Karl A. van Bibber
PEER Director Khalid Mosalam
Institutional Board
Research Committee
Administrative Officer
Zulema Lara
Communications Director
Grace Kang
Lab Manager Alex Mead
Database Administrator Gabriel Vargas
Library Asst. Christina Bodnar-
Anderson
Electronic Comm.
Specialist Erika Donald
Lab Mechanic Robert Cerney
Development Technician 5 Nate Knight
Technical Editor
Claire Johnson
Development Technician 5
Lobsang Garcia
4
5
2 Major Research Projects
PEER manages several multi-year, multi-institutional projects. These projects explore key thrust areas and are broad in their scope and impact areas. Details of current major projects are provided in this chapter.
2.1 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS RESEARCH PROGRAM (TSRP)
PEER receives funding from the State of California to conduct research related to the seismic performance of transportation systems. The purpose of the TSRP is to reduce the negative impact of earthquakes on California’s transportation systems, including highways and bridges, port facilities, high speed rail, and airports. The research utilizes and extends PEER’s PBEE methodologies by integrating fundamental knowledge, enabling technologies, and systems. The research program also integrates seismological, geotechnical, structural, and socio-economical aspects of earthquake and tsunami engineering, and involves computational, experimental, and theoretical investigations.
PEER funded a total of 24 projects from the TSRP in 2017. Seven (7) projects were funded in the early part of the year. Through the RFP process with independent review by the research committee, six (6) seed proposals (less than $50,000) were funded in November 2017. Through the RFP process with independent review by the research committee, eleven (11) full proposals (less than $100,000) were funded in December 2017. Details of these projects are presented in Chapter 3 and at the TSRP website.
2.2 L
lifelines r
T(geotechnagencies example Program seismic hresearch and the P
2.3 T
Tto similaCaliforniBarbara propagatend of thlong-duratsunami continent
2004
LIFELINES
research pro
The Lifelinesnical, struc
(Federal, Sof such suis the NGA
hazard, espeprojects are
Pacific Gas a
TSUNAMI R
The U.S. Pacar local tsunia, there is a or Los Angion, the entir
he Aleutian (ation groundinundation. tal margin
4 Indian Ocean T
PROGRAM
ojects are org
s program bctural); scieState of Ca
uccessful muA-West initicially in thediverse and
and Electric
RESEARCH
ific Northwenamis genertsunami thregeles Basinre U.S. westAlaska) andd shaking aSuch a sce
where majo
sunami Damage
Lifelines Resear
M
ganized into
brings togethntists (geol
alifornia, prultidisciplinaiative, whiche western U.d include theCompany.
H PROGRA
Theretsunakilledeven whichenormnuclePlant
est (Washingrated by a Ceat that coul
ns. Based ont coast is vul
d Philippine Massociated wenario is noor geologic
rch Topics
6
eight topics
her multidislogists, seisrivate industary collaborh resulted inS. Sources o California D
AM
e has beenamis since 2d more than
further folh killed mmous econoear disaster at.
gton, OregonCascadia sud be triggeren the directlnerable to dMain Islands
with the subdot an except
subduction
The gprograsafetysystemprograresearcollablifelinresearfrom of groresponstructuelectr
as shown in
sciplinary tesmologists, try); academ
ration that wn major advof funding fDepartment
n increasing2004 when n 230,000 llowing the
more than omic damagat the Fukus
n, and Northubduction zoed by a submtivity characdistant tsunams. The extremduction faultion; it is a
processes o
goal of the am is to i
y and reliabms. The pam are primrch projectboration amnes organizarchers. Thesengineeringound motionse, respoures, and
ric substationn the accomp
eams of pracsocial scie
micians, andwas funded vances in chfor the Lifeliof Transpor
g public attthe Indian people. Att2011 East
18,000 peoge, includinshima Daiich
hern Californone earthquamarine landscteristics ofmis originatme scenario lt rupture, fo
common ooccur. Subs
PEER Lifeimprove sebility of lifprojects in
marily user-dts, with s
mong sponsations and Pse projects rg characterizons, to localnse of bperformanc
n equipmentpanying diag
cticing engientists); fund end-usersby the Life
haracterizatioines programrtation (Caltr
tention giveOcean Tsu
tention increJapan Tsun
ople and cang a devasthi Nuclear P
nia) is vulneake. In Souslide off the Sf tsunami enting in the eawould be st
ollowed by occurrence instantial struc
elines ismic feline
this driven strong soring PEER range zation l soil
bridge ce of t. The gram.
ineers nding s. An elines on of
m and rans),
en to unami eased nami, aused tating
Power
erable uthern Santa nergy astern trong, large n the ctural
damage engineeri
Pfor hazarand fossiemergencpublic fastructureterm econbeing coTsunami
2.4 S
homes, ahousing conducteexpertiseresearchewell as ex
caused by ing design p
EER’s tsunard, structuralil power plancy tsunami
acilities (e.g.s and lifelinnomic impaonducted elsEngineering
SEISMIC PE
and will dirstock. The p
ed by a teame in seismic ers from UCxperienced p
tsunamis inractice for th
ami researchl, damage, annts, liquefiedshelters, tra
., fire and pones will likelcts. This ressewhere. PEg (PBTE)—e
ERFORMA
Tl$pCB
rectly contribproject is in
m of academidesign, anal
C Berkeley, practicing en
n Japan undhe multiple-h
h program innd loss anald natural gasansportation olice stationly lead to lo
search focus EER’s methexpands and
ANCE OF R
The Californlargest provi$3.4 millionproject, entiCripple WalBuildings,” wbute to the
n progress aic and practlysis, testingUC Irvine, U
ngineers in C
7
derscores thehazard scena
ncludes the dyses for crit
s and oil storcorridors in
ns, hospitals,oss of life, dis a crucial
hodology ded extends the
RETROFITT
nia Earthquaiders of resi
n, 3.5-year reitled “Quantls and Sill Awill evaluatimproveme
and is in its icing expertg, and earthqUCLA, UC
California.
e urgency oario.
developmenttical structurrage facilitiencluding co, and schooldelays in emgap in tsunaevelopment—e existing PB
TED HOME
ake Authoritidential earthesearch contifying the
Anchorage inte the seismient of seism
second yeats with uniququake-risk mSan Diego,
of re-exami
t of an effectres and lifelies, civilian anastal bridgels). Failure o
mergency resami research—called PeBEE method
ES
ty (CEA), onhquake insur
ntract to PEEPerformanc
n Single Famic performan
mic resiliencyar. This mulue and natiomodeling. Th, and Stanfo
ning the pr
tive methodoines: e.g., nund military p
es, and impoof critical cosponse, and h efforts currrformance-B
dology.
ne of the worance, awardER. The resce of Retrofmily Wood-fnce of residey of Califorlti-year projeonally recognhe team inc
ord Universit
resent
ology uclear ports, ortant oastal long-rently Based
orld’s ded a earch fit of frame ential rnia’s ect is nized
cludes ty, as
8
3 R
PEER fusimulatiofunded p
3.1 RS
Ross W. Bou
ABSTRA
This resetests on PEER-baprocedurreinforcedeformatinfrastrucavailableinitiationduring eaembankmvalidatinarchived research
of individ
Resear
unded projecon, tsunami rojects and p
REMEDIATISOIL–CEME
DetaiEffecbelowCivilPost-TechVisitiUnde
langer
ACT
earch projecthe 9-m rad
ased collabres for usements for tions for ecture. The e physical n and prograrthquake sh
ment. The reg liquefactiodata provideffort compduals from th
rch Hig
cts covered research, tr
published PE
ION OF LIQENT REINF
ils of the Pcts on Embaw. The proje Engineering
-doc, UC Dnology, Daning Scholaergraduate re
ct facilitateddius centrifuborative efse of soilmitigating mbankment
centrifuge modeling d
ression in shaking affecesults of theon remediat
de a basis foleted both exhe three invo
ghlight
key thrust ransportationEER reports
QUEFACTIFORCEME
PEER fundeankments Uect Principal g, UC Davis
Davis, Ali n Wilson, Aar, China esearchers, U
d performinguge at UC Dffort to l–cement gliquefactions and othe
tests prodata regardsoil–cement cts their abilese tests filleion strategie
or evaluatingxperimental olved institu
9
ts
areas of gen, and infraare presente
ION EFFECNTS
ed research sing Soil-CeInvestigator
s. The researKhosravi, V
Associate DirEarthquak
UC Davis
g two centrDavis as part
develop dgrid and p-induced grer transport
ovided the ding how
grids and lity to mitiged a high-pres. Although
g numerical and numeri
utions mentio
o-hazards, castructure syed in the foll
CTS ON EM
project, “Rement Reinfr (PI) is Rosrch team incVisiting Schrector of CG
ke Adminis
rifuge t of a
design panel round tation
first crack panels
gation potentriority researh beyond thmodeling pr
ical efforts boned above.
Mod
computationystems. Higlowing sectio
MBANKME
Remediation forcements,”s W. Boulancludes Mohaholar, Shari
GM, UC Davstration, an
tial ground rch need forhe scope of rocedures. Tby leveraging
del Configurationin
nal modelingghlights of ons.
ENTS USIN
of Liquefa” are highlignger, Professammad Khosif Universitvis, W. Yunnd A. Pu
deformationr developing
f this projectThis collaborg research e
n with model dime(mm)
g and these
G
action ghted sor of sravi, ty of
nlong, ulido,
ns for
g and t, the rative fforts
ensions
RESEAR
CentrifugembankmcorresponSoil-cemthe toe oearthquakexperimeproceduruser-defipropertiethe recorduring bmagnitudtheir full these numarea-weigsoils in th
3.2 SM
Armen Kiuregh
ABSTRA
This proconductestochastifault grobased panear-faulhorizontamethod ground source anProject Inon-puls
RCH IMPAC
ge tests andment on a lnded to a 2
ment walls wf the embanke motions ental data wres. Nonlineained constitues for the trerded dynamiboth eventsdes and patte
length in thmerical modghted properheir foundati
STOCHASTMOTIONS F
Der hian
DetSimbeloAmEmAssAmDao
ACT
oject is an eed under prec modeling
ound motionarameterizedlt ground mal directionsof generatmotions fo
nd site charImage, this me-like groun
T
d two-dimeliquefiable 8-m-tall emb
were construcnkment with
having pewere archivear deformatiutive mode
eatment zoneic responses. The simuerns, and corhe second evdeling procerties, for anaions.
TIC MODELFOR USE IN
tails of themulation of Now. The pro
merican Univeritus, UC
sistant Profemerican Univoud, Graduat
extension ofevious PEE
and simulans. We deved stochastic motion in tw
and presentting syntheor specifieracteristics thmethod accound motions,
ensional nonfoundation bankment ucted througha replaceme
eak horizonted as a lastiion analysesel PM4Sande. The nume, including tulations rearrectly predi
vent. The resedures, inclualyses of em
LING AND N PBEE
e PEER funNear-Fault G
oject Principversity of Berkeley. T
essor, Depaversity of Bte Research
f the researR funding ation of neaeloped a sitmodel of t
wo orthogonted a practic
etic near-faud earthquahat are readunts for the rin accordan
10
nlinear dynalayer treatenderlain by
h the loose sent ratio of 2tal base acing resource
s were perford for the lierical simulathe triggerinasonably apicted that thesults of theseuding the re
mbankments w
SIMULATI
nded researGround Motal InvestigatArmenia; T
The co-Prinartment of Beirut, Leba
Assistant, A
rch on ar-te-the nal cal ult
ake dily availablrupture direc
nce with thei
amic analysed with soil
a 9-m-thickand layer ov24%. The mccelerations e for validarmed using iquefiable mations were ing of liquefapproximated e soil–cemene comparisonepresentationwith soil–cem
ON OF NE
rch project tions for ustor is ArmenTaisei Profencipal InvesCivil and E
anon. The reAmerican Un
e to design ctivity effectir observed
Illustratio
ses were pel–cement wk saturated lver a 30-m-l
model was shof 0.26g
ation of numthe platform
materials anin reasonableaction in the
the observnt walls wouns provide s
n of the treament treatm
EAR-FAULT
“Stochasticse in PBEE”n Der Kiureessor of Cstigator is MEnvironmenesearch team
niversity of B
engineers. t and producproportions
on of Simulation
erformed fowalls. The m
loose sand llong section
haken with sand 0.54g.
merical modm FLAC witnd area-avere agreementloose sand
ved deformuld shear thrsupport for uatment zone
ment of liquef
T GROUND
c Modeling” are highligeghian, Presiivil Engine
Mayssa Dabntal Engineem includes Beirut, Leban
As shown ices pulse-lik
among reco
Procedure
or an model layer.
n near scaled
The deling th the raged t with layer
mation rough use of
with
fiable
D
g and ghted ident,
eering baghi, ering, Yara
non
in the ke and orded
11
near-fault ground motions. The method accounts for temporal and spectral non-stationarity and for the variability inherent in real earthquake ground motions.
Given the small number of parameters and a limited dataset to which it was fitted, the current model is not able to capture all characteristics of recorded near-fault ground motions. Therefore, in this study, the existing model will be scrutinized and ways to improve its formulation investigated, with focus on those components that most influence structural response. The ground-motion characteristics that we seek to improve include correlations between spectral values at different periods and variability in spectral accelerations at long periods. The improved formulation will better characterize the level of ground shaking in seismic performance assessment and design of long-period structures, such as tall buildings and long-span bridges.
The research will also facilitate use of the simulation procedure for practicing engineers. The methods of computing the modulating function parameters will be improved; the size of the generated time series data will be reduced to make ensuing structural response calculations more tractable; and users will be given more flexibility in the specification of the input, e.g., by adding an option to generate ground motions for randomized hypocenter locations.
RESEARCH IMPACT
This project contributes to the first step of PEER’s PBEE methodology, namely, characterization of the seismic hazard at a location of interest with a special focus on near-fault sites. Near-fault ground motions may possess distinct characteristics—including the rupture directivity effect—that should be taken into account in the seismic risk and performance assessment of structures located nearby active faults.
Probabilistic seismic hazard analysis (PSHA) can be conducted by combining the proposed ground-motion model and simulation procedure for seismic-source characterization. This first step of PBEE is crucial for the ensuing steps of computing structural responses for the given hazard, defining and computing relevant measures of damage to structural and non-structural components and equipment, and computing decision variables that relate to casualties, costs, and downtime. These decision variables drive performance-based design of structures, rendering careful characterization of ground motions essential. Thus, we believe the results of this project will fill an important gap in the practice of PBEE.
By improving the existing near-fault ground-motion model and simulation procedure, the research being conducted will facilitate the use of simulated ground motions in PBEE. Specifically, for any set of earthquake source and site characteristics, one can generate realistic simulated near-fault ground motions that have similar statistical characteristics as recorded motions in the NGA-West2 database. These simulated motions can be used in response history analysis and PBEE applications in place of or in addition to recorded ground motions, without any need for scaling (which is a questionable practice in many instances). For example, the outcome of this research can be used to characterize the level of ground shaking in the seismic performance assessment or design of long-period structures, such as tall buildings and long-span bridges in near-fault regions.
3.3 RA
Filip. C. Filipp
ABSTRA
The projdisplacemexcitation(NDAs) behavior
Aconcrete Image (aidentifyinconvergefollowingaddressed(2) elemeMaterial characterrepresentshear foradditionaunbalancform of sand integinteractioto coordiintelligen
Aperformebridges. Engineercriteria fo
RESEAR
The PBEobjective
RESOLUTIOANALYSIS
pou
DetailIssuesprojecEnginPostdReseaBerke
ACT
ject will dments and cns. Such guto assess thand experim
Analytical mbridges in
a)] will be ng the souence in nong three cd simultaneoent models;
models wristics at largted with nonrces without al global deced dynamic solution scrigration methon between tinate the evnt solution sc
An extensiveed to developCollapse fraring Demandor describing
RCH IMPAC
EE concepts e is defined
ON OF NOOF BRIDG
ls of the PEs in Seismicct Principaneering, UCoctoral Re
archer, UC Beley.
evelop guidcorrespondinuidelines wihe collapse mental obser
odels for typCalifornia [generated furces of nnlinear bridgcritical aspously: (1) mand (3) solu
with robusge strains sunlinear eleme
resorting toegrees of fforces at th
ipts with inthods in respthe nested italuation of cripts.
e set of NDp guidelinesagility curved Parameterg physical co
T
show great d in terms o
N-CONVERGES
EER fundedc Response l Investiga
C Berkeleyesearcher, UBerkeley; an
delines for ng deformatill allow userisk of brid
rvations.
pical reinforrefer to Pro
for study. Anumerical nge models, pects will material modution strategst convergeuitable for brents to accouo external zefreedom (DOhese DOFs. Atelligent swiponse to moterations betthe structura
DAs under a for robust N
es [refer to Prs (EDPs) aollapse.
promise forof an “acce
12
RGENCE IS
d research prAnalysis o
ator is Filiy. The reseUC Berkelnd Jiawei C
overcomingtions for brers to perfo
dge structure
rced oject After non-
the be
dels; gies. ence ridge analyseunt for the coero-length spOF) leadingAdaptive solitching betwonitored locatween elemeal, element,
a large enseNDAs and thProject Imagat relevant li
r improving eptable” pro
SSUES IN
roject “Resoof Bridges” ip Filippouearch teamley; Jade Chen, Gradu
g non-convridge structuorm robust es in a fash
es will be idomplex inter
pring or hingg to numerlution strateg
ween suitableal and globent, section,
and materi
emble of grhe consisten
ge (b)] will bimit states i
design pracobability of
SEISMIC R
olution of Nare highligh
u, Professom includes
Cohen, Gruate Student
ergence issures under nonlinear dion consiste
dentified. Briraction of axge elements,rical sensitigies will be e nonlinear al variablesand materia
al response
round motiont collapse ribe used to cin order to
ctice. The sacollapse. C
RESPONSE
Non-Converghted below.
or of StrucThanh N.
raduate StuResearcher
sues under extreme se
dynamic anaent with phy
idge piers wxial, flexural, which introivities underdeveloped i
solution sch. Because oal, it is impowith the he
ons will theisk assessmecorrelate diff
identify rea
fety performCollapse sha
E
gence . The ctural
Do, udent r, UC
large ismic
alyses ysical
will be l, and oduce r the in the
hemes of the ortant elp of
en be ent of ferent alistic
mance all be
quantifiemotions. significancompleteConverseresult in
Acomplexiand will deploymshear andthe non-cand plasdevelopmand matedynamic interactioNDAs ofmethods be useful
3.4 TB
Claudia Oste
ABSTRA
Hybrid Sreinforcecolumns columns full-scaleSimulatiocolumns of corrosstructureplastic hremaindetesting,
d as realistiA challenge
nt percentagely may resely, assuminan overestim
A comprehenity inherent contribute tent of a newd reinforcemconvergencestic hinge ement of inteerial state danalysis of
on and sevef bridge strufor nonlinea
l for other ty
TESTING ABRIDGE CO
rtag
DetailEnvirPrinciCivil ProjecUC B
ACT
Simulation (ed-concrete (
is very limbecause of t
e testing is on providessubjected to
sion damage s. The study
hinge regioner of the coluan impresse
ically as pose with the prge of nonlinsult in a s
ng all instancmation of the
nsive set oin nonlinearo the accept
w class of brment pull-oute issues thatlements curlligent nonldeterminatiostructures fo
eral local phuctures will far dynamic aypes of struct
AND HYBRIOLUMNS
ls of the PEonmentally ipal InvestigEngineering
ct Scientist, Berkeley; and
HS) is utiliz(RC) bridge.ited, leadingthe complica
complicates a cost-effeo seismic dem
in the plastiy considers n of the coumn and bried current
ssible using roposed anal
near time hissubstantial uces of non-ce collapse pr
f guidelinesr softening retance of nonridge pier mt in a consistt arise with rrently in uinear solutio
on will impror sophisticahenomena. Tform the staranalysis of btures.
ID SIMULA
EER funded Damaged B
gator is Claug, UC BerkUC Berkele
d Ian D. Will
zed to inves. Data regardg to inaccurated behavio
ed and expeective, accumands. The ic hinge of ba single-co
olumn to beidge will be will acceler
13
NDA, whiclysis procedustory analysunderestima
convergence obability.
s will formesponse undnlinear respo
models that atent iterativethe large co
use in nonlion strategiesrove the sta
ated structuraThe standardrting point f
bridge model
ATION OF E
research proBridge Columudia P. Osterkeley. The ey; Jacob F.liams, Gradu
stigate the seding the seisate simulatioor of corrosiensive, andrate methodpurpose of t
bridge columolumn, single simulated simulated arate the pro
ch incorporaure is that unes fail to co
ation of theas represen
m the startiner large disp
onse studies account for le element forollection of inear bridges that coordate-of-the-aral elements bdized templafor the collabls. It stands t
ENVIRONM
oject “Testinmns” are higrtag, T.Y. anresearch te
. Duncan, Guate Student
eismic resposmic performons of envirion-damaged
d is thus vid for testingthis investig
mns on the see-bent bridg
as the exps the analytiopagation o
ates several nder high levonverge. Igne true collanting physica
ng point forplacements ain professio
localized phrmulation wzero length
e response dinate the strt and practby accountinates for elemborative groto reason tha
MENTALLY
ng and Hybrghlighted bend Margareteam includeGraduate Stut Researcher
onse of a comance of corronmentallyd RC elemenirtually nong corrosion-
gation is to eveismic perfoge with twoperimental ical substrucof corrosion
suites of grvels of loadinoring theseapse probabal collapse w
r addressingand deformatonal practiceenomena su
will help mininonlinear s
simulations.tructure, elemtice of nonlng for multi-ment testing
owth of imprat these tools
Y DAMAGE
rid Simulatielow. The prt Lin Professes Selim Güudent Researr, UC Berkel
orrosion-damrroded RC b damaged bnts. Addition
nexistent. H-damaged bvaluate the ermance of b
o spans, witsubstructurecture. Prior tn damage in
round ing, a
e runs bility. would
g the tions,
e. The uch as imize
spring . The ment, linear -axial g and roved s will
ED
on of roject sor in ünay, rcher, ley.
maged bridge bridge nally,
Hybrid bridge effect
bridge h the
e; the to HS n the
experimecracks mbridge cspecimenspecimenlevels of conductedirectionthree-actudegrees-oand one effects operforma
RESEAR
In 2016, are structday-to-damobility concrete confidenassumes,The residunknownsafety ofhelp fill environm
3.5 TT
Brett Ma
ABSTRA
State-of-pcommensgeology mgeotechnremains
ental substrumatching thcolumns in ns will be n as a contf corrosion ded using ns: one horiuator set-upof -freedomrotational, a
of corrosion-ance of bridg
RCH IMPAC
the Federalturally deficay use, but of emergenbridges in
ce that such however, thdual drift ann. This lack of people livithat gap in k
mentally dete
TOWARDS TRANSPOR
aurer
DeLiqThUnGraGra
ACT
practice apsurate with maps that ar
nical tests tha persistent
ucture and hose observ
the field. tested: on
trol and twamage. The ground mozontal and
p is used tom (DOF), twas shown in -induced longe columns.
T
l Highway Acient. The de
especially incy and rescseismically
h bridges wilhat bridges and load-carryof data poseing in seismknowledge aeriorated brid
MULTI-TIERTATION IN
tails of the Pquefaction Ime project P
niversity of aduate Studaduate Stude
pproaches fdistributed
re typically that are typic
challenge t
induce verved on exisA set of t
ne non-corrowo with var
HS tests wiotions in one vertica
o control thwo translatiFigure 1. R
ngitudinal cr
Administratioeteriorated stn the case ocue crews isactive regio
ll be operatioare in a pristying capacits a large rese
mically activeand obtain adges.
ER MODELNFRASTRU
PEER fundempacts on TPrincipal In
Washingtodent Researcent Research
for predictintransportati
too general tcally too coo assess reg
14
rtical sting three oded rying ll be two
al. A hree-ional
Results of thracking in t
on reported tate of theseof a large ss imperativeons are desonal immeditine, undamaty of corrodearch gap, oe areas. Thea better unde
LING OF LIUCTURE
d research pTransportationvestigator on. The rescher, Univeher, Universi
ng soil liqion infrastruo be accuratstly to be f
gional liquef
hese tests withe plastic h
that 5.6% oe bridges posseismic evene for post-digned and tiately followaged conditioded bridges one that come research coerstanding of
QUEFACT
project “Towon Infrastrucis Brett M
search teamersity of Wity of Washi
quefaction aucture) havete at site-spefeasible overfaction haza
Figure
ill then be uhinge region
of all RC brses a seriousnt. Followindisaster respotested thorouwing a large on prior to tfollowing a
mes with poteonducted inf the seismic
TION IMPAC
wards Multi-cture” are hi
Maurer, Assm includes Washington a
ington.
at the rege traditional
ecific scales; r large area
ards in a ma
e 1: Experimenta
used to assesn on the se
idges in thes risk, not ong such an eonse. Reinfoughly, with earthquake.
the seismic eseismic eve
ential threat tn this projectc performan
CTS ON
Tier Modeliighlighted beistant ProfeMertcan G
and Alex B
ional-scale lly relied oand/or (b) in
al extents. Itanner that is
l Set-Up
ss the ismic
e U.S. nly in event, forced
high . This event. ent is to the t will
nce of
ing of elow. essor,
Geyin, Baird,
(i.e., n (a) n situ t thus both
accurate and lossinfrastrucon probafreely avgeotechnan infiniprelimina~10,000 CPT-bas[2017]. Mshown inunder a Figure 1(cost and which apredict dIn particfor paveon shallopart, bperformaearthquakassessme
RESEAR
The PBEsoil liqueinclude: developminfrastruc(e) areasultimateldata of dinformatiapproachby econoanalyses)demonstrFranciscoamong ot
and inexpens incurred bcture planne
abilities of livailable geo
nical methodite number ary test of lcase studie
ed geotechnModel efficn Figure 1(a)ROC curve (b), the geossimplicity. T
aims to extdamage and lcular, predicments, bridg
ow foundatioy the un
ance data rekes, which ents for ~80,
RCH IMPAC
EE-compatibefaction to b(a) regiona
ment; (c) emcture with pos that lack gly inform an diverse originion to the fu
h is critical fomics (e.g., ). As part orated for loco, Californiathers.
nsive. By coby transporrs and ownequefaction oospatial datads, “geospatiof locationsliquefaction s from the
nical modelsacy was ass), which me(AUC) wa
spatial modeThese provotend geospaloss within Pctive tools mges, pipelinons. This is nprecedentedesulting from
includes d000 infrastru
T
le tools resube rapidly aal loss estimmergency resossible damageotechnical
ensemble-mns and scalesullest extentfor complime
methods baof this Seed cations withia; Santa Mo
orollary, a strtation infraers must makoccurrence. Ma have receal” models c
s anywhere models basCanterbury, were testedsessed via rasures the ras used to qel performedocative findinatial modeliPBEE framewmay be devenes, and stru
made possid infrastrum the Cantdamage anducture assets
ulting from thand probabilmation and sponse; (d) age, thus mal testing. Bemodelling aps to predict lt possible. Inenting methoased on in s
Project, thein PEER’s gonica, Califo
15
till more diffastructure aske decisions Meanwhile, ently been can predict lin the worl
sed on geosp, New Zeald against thereceiver-opeates of true-uantify and
d remarkablyngs support ing to works. eloped uctures ble, in ucture-terbury d loss-s.
his project wistically predisaster simpost-event r
aximizing theeyond these pproach by wliquefaction n moving toods that are situ geoteche PBEE appgeographic dornia; Eurek
fficult challes a result based on thliquefactionproposed. I
liquefaction ld. The resepatial versuand, earthque seminal geerating-chara- and false-p
compare my well, especthe potentia
will allow foedicted at nomulation; (breconnaissane efficiency immediate
which engine impacts, theowards this more advan
hnical tests oplication of domain. Canka, Californi
enge is to prof liquefact
hese downstrn-prediction In contrast rapidly and
earch team us geotechnicuakes. Two eospatial moacteristic (Rpositive predmodel efficaccially considal of this PE
or the downso cost. Potenb) city plannce (e.g., toof field recoimpacts, th
eers can statereby exploilong-term g
nced but spator effective-the develop
ndidate locatia; and Seat
edict the damtion. Ultimaream impactmodels baseto convent
d inexpensivehas performcal data utilstate-of-pra
odel of Zhu OC) analysi
dictions. Thecy. As showdering its relER Seed Pro
stream impacntial applica
nning and po rapidly ideonnaissance)he research ctistically coaiting all avaigoal, a first-tially-constr-stress numeped tools witions includettle, Washin
mage ately, s, not ed on tional ely at
med a lizing actice et al. is, as e area wn in lative oject,
cts of ations policy entify ); and could alesce ilable -order rained erical ill be e San
ngton,
3.6 HL
Kenigi So
ABSTRA
The goautilize a agent-basquantify transportpipeline nunder dscenariosquantify infrastrucmodel caground-msimulatintraversinresponse weights oweights othus changround-mdoing soand stratStanford earthquakover timearthquakof ABM and wate
RESEAR
The loss rescue anroute avaunder disultimate
HIGH-PERFLAYERED C
ga
DetailBasedhighliChancUC BUnive
ACT
al of this pgraph-parallsed model
the perftation networnetworks at
different gros. The objethe perform
cture networapable of simmotion scenang city-scaleg close to refrom indivi
of the edgesof the edges/nging the re
motion cases, the dynam
tegy of recoUniversity,
ke-damage-ime. The fragi
ke shaking wsimulations
er pipeline ne
RCH IMPAC
of accessibind recovery ailability, trasaster scenaraim of this
FORMANCCITY-SCAL
ls of the Pd Distributedighted belocellor’s ProfBerkeley; Aersity.
project is tlel distribute
(ABM) tformance orks and watethe city scal
ound motioctives are t
mance of thesrks using a hmulating thearios. The dee infrastructueal time. Thidual agent bs on a graph/ removal ofesponse of s are supplied
mic performaovery of the , which aiminduced traffility curves will be used s on traffic networks are a
T
ility due to dof a city aft
affic distriburios so as toproject is to
E COMPUTLE TRANS
PEER funded Multi-Lay
ow. The pfessor, UC BAlexandre B
to ed to of er le
on to se high-fidelitye interactioneveloped graure networkse purpose obehaviors. Mh network (ef an edge), wa city. In thd by EBMUance of wate
water netwms to build ffic capacity
and recoveas inputs to networks wiaffected by a
damages/closter natural dution, reducto evaluate tho provide a t
16
TING-BASEPORTATIO
d research yered City-Sproject PrinBerkeley. ThBayen, UC
y microscale ns between taph-parallel s with hundrf the ABM
Macro-scale ee.g., reduced
which in turnhis project,
UD, and the eer pipelines
work is evaluand utilize loss and resry time modour HPC-ba
ill be conducan earthquak
sures of trandisasters. Tration in speed
he impacts antool that ena
ED DISTRION NETWO
project “HiScale Transpncipal Invehe research
Berkeley;
model and tthe above twdistributed
red-thousandtool is to caevents such d road capacn affect the b
pipeline daeffect on trafafter an ear
uated. This a model th
storation witdels for ind
ased transporcted to test ke event.
nsportation nansport assetd, and reconnd plan for ables city-sc
IBUTED MUORK TOOL
igh-Performportation Nestigator is team includand Jack
to develop awo networkcomputing t
d links and mapture the co
as earthquacity/road clobehavior of iamage scenaffic networkrthquake anproject link
hat links indth network-ledividual bridrtation netwscenarios w
network can t managers nnstruction redisaster reli
cale resilienc
ULTI-L
mance Competwork Tool
Kenichi Sdes Joan WaBaker, Stan
a unified netks under difftool is capabmillions of aomplex city-akes influencosures updatindividual agarios by diffk is examinedd the assess
ks to the wodividual brievel performdges subjectork tool. A s
when both br
greatly affecneed to knowesources reqef measures
ce planning u
puting l” are Soga, alker, nford
twork ferent ble of agents -scale ce the te the gents, ferent d. By sment ork of dges’
mance ted to series ridges
ct the w the
quired . The using
HPC for analysis recovery develope
3.7 IM
Pedro Ardu
ABSTRA
Soil liquduring ealiquefiabare neceadvancedproposedplasticityapplicatioand Ziotoby Dafalimechanicsimulate geotechnuser cangeneratioin total aSince its and reseobservatielement models. challengefurther wusing exi
RESEAR
Predictiogoal is tothose par
infrastructuin real timscenarios
ed to include
MPLEMEN
uino
DetaiPM4Sis PedUnivestuden
ACT
uefaction is arthquakes. le soils, adv
essary. Overd models ford. Among thy model foons recentlyopoulou [20ias and Mancs concepts
general trenical earthqun achieve reon and dissipand optional)
introductionarchers due ions. The Ulevel usingPreliminary
es related towork. The goisting experi
RCH IMPAC
on of the beho have an adrameters usu
ure planners me and enab
after an ea more sophi
TATION AN
ls of the PESand in Opedro Arduinoersity of Want, Universit
a major cauTo predict t
vanced consr the last dr liquefiable hem, PM4S
or earthquaky proposed
015]. This 2Dnzari [2004] a. The mode
ends observeuake engineeeasonable apation, limiti), the user can, the PM4S
to its relatW Computa a “contain
y results uso model staboal of this pimental resul
T
havior of liqudvanced modually require
in the Bay Ables probabiarthquake. Bsticated mod
ND VALIDA
EER funded nSees” are h
o, Professor, ashington. Thty of Washin
use of damthe behaviorstitutive moddecade sevesoils have b
Sand is a sake engineer
by BoulanD plane-straand is basedel has beened in the fiering practicapproximatioing strains, aan further fiSand model tively easy ational Geomner” constituing convent
bility and efproposal is tlts for 2D an
uefiable soildel. Existing a great effo
17
Area. The pilistic analysBeyond thidels and infr
ATION OF
research prohighlighted bDepartment
he research tngton.
age r of dels eral een and ring nger ain model fod on boundinn calibrated ield and emce. By changons of desiand cyclic mine tune the has drawn wcalibration p
mechanics gutive driver tional stress
fficiency ando implemen
nd 3D bound
ls is importag models usuort to calibra
proposed toosis through s proposal,
rastructure ty
PM4SAND
oject “Implebelow. The pt of Civil & team include
llows the plng surface pl
at an elemmpirical corrging three pired behavio
mobility. Usiresponse, alwide attentioprocess and
group has imspecially d
s paths are d implementnt PM4Sand dary-value pr
ant for desigually requireate. The PM4
ol can potentmultiple rufurther res
ypes.
D IN OPENS
ementation aproject PrincEnvironmen
es Long Che
lasticity framlasticity and ment level trelations com
primary inpuor, includining secondarlthough this on of geotec
d good agreemplemented tdesigned to
very promtation into Oin OpenSee
roblems.
gn. Key to ace many inpu4Sand mode
tially be useuns for diffsearch coul
SEES
and Validaticipal Investintal Engineeen, PhD Gra
mework propcritical state
to approximmmonly use
ut parametersng pore prery parameteris not neces
chnical engiement with this model atest constit
mising. HowOpenSees rees and valid
ccomplishingut parameterel was introd
ed for ferent ld be
on of igator ering, duate
posed e–soil
mately ed in s, the
essure rs (18 ssary. ineers
field at the tutive
wever, equire date it
g this rs and duced
to proviPM4Sandliquefiab
3.8 M
Jack Bake
ABSTRA
The goalbuild aindividuadamage-icapacity with performaadditionaof criticresearch quantify performanetwork-understanlevel. Wdamage, restoratioindividuacompone
RESEAR
Communagencies.framewoindividuaprovide interest icomponequantifyiwill help
de relativeld model in le soils. Thi
MODELING
er
DetailNetwoJack BRodriBhatta
ACT
l of this pra model tal bridges’ einduced
loss and net
ance over tal travel timcal connecti
objectiveshow individ
ance contr-level resiliennd how resi
We will builand networ
on over timal bridge riskent performa
RCH IMPAC
nity resilienc. Common rks for descal bridge pera link betwin enhancedents and coing the benep make the c
ly good apOpenSees ws tool can be
G BAY ARE
ls of the PEEork ResilienBaker, Assoigo Silva, Gacharjee, Gr
roject is to that links earthquake-
traffic restoration
twork-level time (e.g.,
me and loss ions). The s are to dual bridge ributes to nce, and to lience can bd on our p
rk disruptione of bridge k to communance (e.g., vi
T
ce is the focactivities in
cribing resilirformance to
ween PEER’d disaster rerridors who
efits of imprcase for inve
proximationwould provie used by bo
EA TRANSP
ER funded rnce” are highciate Profess
Graduate Sturaduate Stud
be improvedprior work tn (Figure 1)
traffic capanity resilienca retrofit) on
cus of signifnclude the sence. This p
o those broads work on
esilience. Wose functionroved bridgeesting in hig
18
n and easy ide a reliablth researche
PORTATIO
research projhlighted belosor, Stanford
udent Researent Research
d through mito simulate . To this weacity and nece, and to efn that resilien
ficant attentisetting of reproject aims der resiliencenhanced b
We also aim ning is deeme technology
gher-perform
calibrationle and free ters and engin
ON NETWO
ject “Modelow. The prod Universityrcher, Stanfoher, Stanford
itigation actregional-sc
e are addingetwork func
fficiently quance assessm
ion from a nesilience go
to develop ce goals. Onebridge system
to identify med criticaly for comm
mance bridge
n process. Atool to simu
neers in prac
ORK RESIL
ling Bay Areoject Principy. The researford Universd University
tions at the icale seismic g models toctionality. Wantify the im
ment.
number of cials and the predictive me aim of the ms and the
key transpl to regiona
munity resiliee systems (si
An implemulate behavictice.
LIENCE
ea Transportpal Investigarch team incsity and Gitay.
individual-b hazards, b
o characterizWe plan to rmpact of chan
ivic and resdevelopme
models that rproject is thbroader wo
portation netal resilienceence, this primilar to the
ented ior of
tation ator is cludes anjali
bridge bridge ze the relate nging
earch ent of relate hus to orld’s twork e. By roject e way
that PEEsystems)resiliencerole in reof the reg
3.9 L
Jonathan B
ABSTRA
Simplifieprovide structurahave thesignificanwell-docuextensiveprogram,silty soil
Tinvestigaseismic pthe start the geolosites. Wconventiohave liqindicate that a geologic factors cnot maniresponse manifestaperform silty-soil lack of mliquefied
ER’s PBEE . By using e assessmenegional resilgion’s Chief
LIQUEFACT
Bray
Detailat SiltD. BrEnginGradu
ACT
ed liquefactuseful insigl damage du
e opportunitnt earthquakumented pee suite of g, provide an deposits.
The primary ate, characteperformanceof the proje
ogic conditioWe will then
onal procedquefied, budid not liqucommon s
depositican be identifest liquefaof stratified
ation. PM4Snumerical sdeposits to
manifestationd. The PM4
has helpedperformanc
nts, this projience planni
f Resilience O
TION TRIG
ls of the PEEty-Soil Sitesray, Faculty neering, UCuate Student
tion triggerghts, but theuring the 201ty to learn kes that deliverformance ground-motio
exceptional
research taerize, and me of silty-soect, we will ons of all 55n focus on dures indicaut field obuefy. It is hyset of disconal envtified at sitection. It is ad soil deposSand has justimulations t develop inns of liquef4Sand soil
d make the ce metrics mect will alsoing efforts, sOfficers.
GGERING A
ER funded rs” are highliChair in Ea
C Berkeley.Researcher,
ring proceduey cannot e10–2011 Can
how the svered differof land an
on recording opportunity
asks are to model the il sites. At investigate 5 NGL-NZ
sites that ate should bservations ypothesized criminating vironmental es that did also hypoth
sits is requirt recently bethat capture sights regarfaction at sitmodel will
19
case for invmore closelo position Psuch as SPU
AND EFFEC
esearch projighted belowrthquake En The resea, UC Berkele
ures and pexplain the nterbury earsame groundent intensiti
nd structuresgs and the y to advance
esized that red to captureen implemen
the nonlineding key mtes that siml be exercis
vesting in hly aligned wPEER’s reseUR’s work w
CTS AT SIL
ject “Liquefaw. The Princngineering Earch team ey.
post-liquefacdifferent lev
rthquake seqd and strucies and duras in Christccomprehens
e our underst
an assessmere the obsernted in Open
ear, effectiveechanisms a
mplified procsed extensi
higher-perfowith those arch to mor
with San Fra
LTY-SOIL
faction Triggcipal InvestigExcellence, P
includes D
ction settlemvels of liqu
quence. It is ctures respoations of strochurch, com
sive subsurfatanding of th
ent of the sorved cases onSees. It wile stress respand probablecedures indicvely initiall
ormance buiof relevanc
re directly pancisco and
SITES
gering and Efgator is Jon
Professor of Daniel Hutab
ment proceuefaction-indextremely ra
onded to seong shakingmbined withface investighe liquefacti
oil–water syof no liquefall be employonse of strae reasons focate should ly to ensur
ilding e for
play a those
ffects athan Civil barat,
dures duced are to everal . The h the gation ion of
ystem action yed to atified or the
have re its
implemenresponse develop asilty-soil
RESEAR
Learningunderstanliquefactliquefactbenchmacurrent eliquefactsites will
TChristchusilty-soil liquefactprocedurwith a dliquefactmanifestaZealand, state-of-tliquefactcharacter
3.10 AA
Henry V. Bu
ABSTRA
Decisioncritical sTransporpost-earth
ntation in Oof the soil–
a set of desisites.
RCH IMPAC
g from obsnding in eaion of straion on bri
arks to our uempirical liqion data curl assist greatl
The over-preurch appearsdeposits. Th
ion triggerinres also contdilemma: Hoion triggerinations of liquearthquake
the-art liqueion triggeriristics do not
AFTERSHOASSESSME
urton
Detaand TprojeDepaEndois JoEnviMangCand
ACT
ns about the step in postrtation uses hquake ope
OpenSees is –water systemign guideline
T
servations aarthquake entified deposdges and l
understandinguefaction trirrently availly in broaden
diction of lis to be due the empiricalng data fromtributes to thow can the png procedureuefaction wes? This proj
efaction procing with tht manifest liq
OCK SEISMENT OF BR
ails of the PETime-Depenect Principaartment of Cowed Chair ionathan Stewronmental galathu, Podidate, UCLA
structural int-event respa set of briderability of
providing rm will be a es for evalua
after designngineering. sits of siltylifelines prog of soil liquiggering prolable relates ning the app
iquefaction tto their inabl database us
m sand sites. Che over-predprediction oes be reconcere not obser
oject will decedures to ahe field obquefaction a
MIC VULNERIDGES
EER fundedndent Risk Aal Investiga
Civil and Enin Structural
wart, ProfessEngineering
ostdoctoral A.
ntegrity andponse and rdge system-
f bridges. T
20
eliable resulkey issue toating liquefa
n-level eartInvestigatin
y and sandovide invaluefaction. Th
ocedures andto sandy so
plicability of
triggering byility to captused to develoConservatism
diction of liqof liquefactiociled with thrved after in
evelop insighaddress the servations t
and damage b
ERABILITY
d research prAssessment ator is Hevironmentall Engineerinsor and Depg, UCLA. Scholar, UC
d functionalitrecovery. Cu-level damagThe damag
lts. It is hypo explore andaction trigge
thquakes isng the occudy soils andluable inforhe geologic
d their conseoils, so caref design meth
y current prure the seismop these prom of the empquefaction. Eon in these e contradict
ntense shakinhts that wildiscrepancy
that stratifiebridge found
Y AND TIME
roject “Afterof Bridges”
enry V. Bul Engineerinng, UCLA. Tpartment Cha
The reseaCLA and
ty of earthqurrently, thege states as ge states a
pothesized thd to describeering and its
s invaluablurrence or nd evaluatingrmation thadata can be
equential effeful examinahods.
ocedures at mic performocedures conpirical liquefEngineers ar
silty soils uory observatng from the ll enable eny of their oved silty sitdations.
E-DEPEND
rshock Seism” are highligurton, Assi
ng and EngleThe Co-Princair, Departmarch team Mehrdad S
quake-damage Californiathe basis fo
are based o
hat the hydre. Lastly, wes consequenc
e to advannonoccurrencg the effecat will serve used to impfects. Most oation of silty
silty-soil sitmance of stransists primarfaction triggre currently using establtions that suCanterbury,gineers to aver-predictiotes of parti
DENT RISK
mic Vulneraghted belowistant Profeekirk Presidecipal Investi
ment of Civiincludes S
Shokrabadi,
ged bridges a Departmenor classifyinon the HA
raulic e will ces at
ncing ce of
cts of ve as prove of the y-soil
tes in atified ily of
gering faced lished urface New adjust on of icular
K
ability . The essor, ential igator il and Sujith
PhD
are a nt of
ng the AZUS
classificaevent trais deemeHAZUS completetime-depinform relationshthere hasseismic vposed byto quantdependenenvironmproposedPBEE fravulnerabearthquakgoal of iappropriaclosure (p
RESEAR
Bridges aThis is emobility As such,bridges aand cominformedthe funct
ations (minoffic state.” Fed “open to being the pr
e closure of endent after
these hips is uncls been signifvulnerability
y mainshockstify the vulnt risk
ment is stilld research amework to ility and timke-damagednforming deateness and partial and c
RCH IMPAC
are an essentespecially truof emergen
, decisions rare a critical
mparable med post-earthqionality and
r, moderate,For example
limited pubrimary tool ubridges, the
rshock hazardamage-tr
lear. Moreovficant researy and risk ts, recognizedlnerability ain the al in its infawill impleassess the a
me-dependend bridges, ecisions regatiming of p
complete).
T
tial part of thue during th
ncy responderegarding thl step in posteasures of aquake decisi
recovery of
extensive, a, a bridge thblic traffic wused to infore extent to wrd and risk raffic-state ver, while rch on the to bridges d research and time-aftershock ancy. The ement the aftershock nt risk of with the
arding the post-event
he transportahe period imers is highly he structural t-event respaftershock bons related
f transportati
21
and completehat has been with speed, rm post-earthwhich knowl
ation systemmmediately
dependent ointegrity an
onse and recbridge perfoto bridge cl
ion networks
e), with eachclassified aweight, an
hquake deciledge of res
m in Californfollowing a on a functiond functionacovery. The
formance wilosures, whics.
h one assigns having “m
nd lane restrisions regardsidual structu
nia and othermajor earth
oning transpoality of eart developmenill ultimatelch has direc
ned a “likely moderate” darictions.” Deding the partural capacity
r parts of thehquake wheortation netwthquake-damnt of quantitly lead to ct implicatio
post-mage espite tial or y and
e U.S. en the work.
maged tative more
ons to
3.11 P
Erica C. Fis
ABSTRA
This projon perfoevaluatioinvestigaOpenSeecause mo1923 Tokground performavarying Varying is causeseismoloimprove the U.S. proposedretrofit stto be imp
RESEAR
The lossearthquakrequire fileaves mautomatideformatthe fire inbased firsuppressisystem; hhave notdirect imevaluatiocomponeresearch
POST-EART
sher
Detailof Indis Eric
ACT
ject is a seedormance-bason and invesation will uses for multi-hore damage kyo earthquacceleration
ance-based fdegrees of ground acce
ed by the gical, multi-emergency are quantify
d research prtrategies thaplemented by
RCH IMPAC
ses from pokes. Typical
fire suppressimany structur
c fire supprtions, the strnitiates. As re engineeriion systems however, thet been designmpact on thon of industrents of these
can provid
THQUAKE
ls of the PEdustrial Facica C. Fische
d project thaed earthqua
stigation of tse OpenSeehazard evaluthan the eaake, 80% of
ns will be fire engineerdamage to
elerations wifire versus -hazard, andmanagemen
ying the econroject wouldat improve thy contractors
T
ost-earthquakl building deion systems res vulnerabression systeructure is alrboth the earng approachpost-earthqu
ere are still ned with pe
he structuralrial facilities e facilities ande important
FIRE PER
EER funded ilities” are her, Assistant
at will produake and firethe post-earts. Previous uation of buarthquake itsf the damagused and cring approathe buildingll allow the r
the earthqd socio-econont and the renomic impacd work with phe performans.
ke fires canesign allows to be operab
ble to post-eaems. In addready weakerthquake- anhes, more buake that acmany vulne
erformance-bl engineerinin post-eart
nd targeted t informatio
22
RFORMANC
research prohighlighted bProfessor, O
uce results ne engineerinthquake fire
researchersildings. In s
self. In the ce was causecombined dches. The vg during thresearchers tquake grounomical aspecsilience of c
ct of post-earpractitionersnce of buildi
n be compafor plastic d
ble after an earthquake fi
dition, if a bened and potnd fire-enginbuildings caccommodate rable existinbased engineng and emethquake firesimprovemenn regarding
CE OF IND
oject “Post-ebelow. The pOregon State
necessary forng. The scoperformanc
s have demosome cases, case of the ed by post-edesign fire varying grouhe earthquakto quantify hnd motion. cts of earthqcommunitiesrthquake fires to communings in post-
arable to thdeformation earthquake. ires without building hastentially has
neering fieldan be design the plastic ng buildingseering pract
ergency mans, this projecnts that can g emergency
DUSTRIAL
earthquake Fproject Prince University.
r a much larope of the ce of industronstrated gopost-earthqu1906 San Farthquake fiscenarios
und accelerake phase of how much a This workquake and fis. Cities on es on their cnicate the res-earthquake
hose experieof the build
This type ofthe capabili already exp
s residual des move towaned to havedeformation
s in high seistices in mindnagement pct will identibe made. T
y manageme
FACILITIE
Fire Performcipal Investi
ger scope prproject inc
rial facilitiesood results uuake fires teFrancisco anires. A variedeveloped uations will cthe simulat
dditional damk will inteire engineerithe west coa
communitiessults and devfires and are
enced only ding and doef design apprity of operatperienced p
eformations ward perform
e operationan of the strucsmic regionsd. This workractice. Thrify the vulne
The results oent of cities
S
mance igator
roject cludes . The using
end to nd the ety of using cause tions. mage
egrate ing to ast of s. The velop e able
from es not roach tional
plastic when ance-
al fire ctural s that k has rough erable of this s and
communearthquakof this reevaluate would cofire engin
3.12 DIN
Amit M. Kan
ABSTRA
Steel coconnectionumeroutransportprimarilyairports (Californiunobstrupre-1990overpassdesigningby knowwith seperformainfrastrucconnectioexpensivbe highlytorsional dissipatioperforma(supporteductile ainteractiofor the c
ities. By ideke fires, com
esearch projecritical trans
ontribute to bneering desig
DISSIPATIVN AIRPORT
nvinde
DetaiMomhighlProfeReseaWalteand A
ACT
olumn to ons are criti
us structurtation infray include m(a large majia utilize tcted bays),
0 bridges es. The cug base conne
wledge gaps erious implance and eccture. First, ons, requirin
ve base conny ductile, wbuckling). A
on/inelastic ance. This ied independand repairaons betweencomponents
entifying typmmunities caect would besportation inboth the pergn methodol
VE BASE CTS AND OT
ils of the PEment Frame lighted beloessor, UC Daarcher, UC Ders, Forell E
Ali Roufegar
concrete fcal componeres withinastructure.
moment framority of airpthese to aand in num
and frurrent practiections is inh
in several lications foconomy of c
structural sng designersnections. Recwhereas the cAgainst this deformation
is achieved dently of theable) base n these conn
themselves
es of structuan realisticale the foundanfrastructure rformance-balogies.
CONNECTIOTHER TRA
EER funded Structures iw. The proavis. The resDavis; Yazh
Elsesser, PEErinejad, Fore
footing ents of
n the These
mes in ports in achieve merous reeway ice for hibited areas,
or the critical systems do s to design tcent experimcolumns havbackdrop, th
n in the bathrough a
e PEER projconnectionsections and while deve
23
ures vulnerablly plan for tation for a m
for post-earased earthqu
ONS FOR ANSPORTA
research prin Airports oject Principsearch team hi Zhu, PostER BIP; Geell Elsesser, P
not allow dthem as elas
mental researve limited rhis study de
ase connecticoordinated
ject) are reqs, whereas
the system,eloping guid
ble to collaptheir recover
much larger prthquake fireuake enginee
MOMENT-ATION SYS
roject “Dissiand Other T
pal Investigincludes Vin
t-doctoral Reeoff Bomba,PEER BIP.
ductile/dissistic and fixerch shows throtation capaevelops a desions, while d plan of tequired to desimulations
, to establishdelines for s
pse or partialry after a disproject that ues. The resulering and pe
-FRAME STSTEMS
ipative BaseTransportatiator is Amncente Pericesearcher, U, Forell Else
ipative respoed. This resuhat the base acity (due tosign paradigproviding a
esting and evelop resilis are requih acceptancestructural de
l collapse in saster. The reuses OpenSelts of the reserformance-b
TRUCTURE
e Connectionion Systems
mit M. Kanvoli, Post-doc
UC Davis; Messer, PEER
onse in the ults in extreconnectionso local or la
gm that allowacceptable fsimulation; ent (i.e., relired to exae/demand cresign such th
post-esults ees to earch based
ES
ns for s” are vinde, ctoral
Mason BIP;
base emely s may ateral
ws for frame
tests liably amine riteria hat it
24
achieves acceptable performance (e.g., collapse probabilities, deformations etc.), as determined within a PBEE framework.
RESEARCH IMPACT
Column base connections are an essential component of a huge number of transportation structures. Moreover, they are possibly the most important connections in these structures because they carry the largest forces and interact with the frame affecting its response. Current design/construction practices for base connections as well as the structures that utilize them have major conservatisms in material requirements (e.g., deeper embedment or large anchor rods) and inefficiencies (e.g., multiple concrete pours, coordination between steel and concrete trades) that may be eliminated by more research on embedded base connections. These outcomes (mitigation of conservatisms and inefficiencies) will be particularly impactful for two reasons:
They will affect all structures that employ steel–concrete footing connections. These impacts are not limited to one connection detail or issue, and have a broad impact affecting possibly thousands of transportation structures.
Research on base connections is much less developed compared to other connections (beam–column connections). As a result, we are on the steep part of the learning curve, such that major (rather than incremental) advances in our understanding of these connections are expected.
These impacts will be pursued through early and sustained engagement with key code/standard committees, including the American Institute of Steel Construction.
3.13 T
Patrick Ly
ABSTRA
Port facilcausing lcurrents. “extraordreasonabaccuratelproject tosuch thatquantifiecategoriehorizontalarge vodomains.means todifferent quantificdistributiwhich thresponse aim to udynamicswith a tedebris fietypical oboats, anthe debriimpart lo
RESEAR
Advance6 of ASCtsunami sthe debrilikely be to predicimmediatWest Co
TSUNAMI D
ynett
DetaHazPatrinclu
ACT
lities are amlimited or n
Large vesdinary debrile handle oly predict boo develop, vt both the prd. For this
es: (1) detaial-dimensionolume of d. These twoo answer rescales. The ation of ion around hen allows to these loa
understand ts of a tsunamemporally ineld includes of cargo sh
nd vehicles tis on the flowoads on struc
RCH IMPAC
s in this areaCE7-16) aresubcommitteis loading sethe main gu
ct debris trte applicatioast (i.e., San
DEBRIS: SI
ails of the zard and Loarick J. Lyneudes Aykut
mong the mosno inundatiossels, when is,” causing on tsunami-
oth the genervalidate, androbability of
research arled 3D simun (2HD) simdebris throuo approacheesearch que3D simulatithe detaan object for a pro
ads. In the 2he combinemi churning ncreasing de
objects withipping cono understandw field and tctures.
T
a are greatlye shockinglyee begins to ection will uuide for deteansport in on. Scenarion Diego, LA
IMULATING
PEER fundads” are highett, ProfessoAyca, Gradu
st vulnerableon locally co
pulled fromsevere dam
-induced curation and trad apply transf debris imparea, we diviulation of thmulation ofugh port-sizes represent
estions on tion permits iled press
or structuper design 2HD study, ed and coup
through a pebris field. Th length scantainers, smd the impactthe potential
y in need, as y crude andorganize for
undergo signermining howports, and
o simulationA/LB, Oaklan
25
G HAZARD
ded researchhlighted beloor of Civil uate Student
e to tsunami ould greatlym their bermage to anyurrent modeansport of deport models
act as well aide the debrhe flow arouf a zed t a two the ure
ure, in
we pled port The ales mall t of l to
existing appd often highr ASCE7-22nificant reviw to change the detachm
ns will be pend/Richmon
D AND LOA
h project “Tow. The proEngineering
t Researcher
hazards. Evy impact porrths by they structure eling in porebris. It is th
s for variouss the magnitris transportund a singl
proaches forhly conserva2 revisions, esion. The rethe section.
ment and drerformed at
nd, and Seatt
ADS
Tsunami Deoject Principg, USC. Thr, USC.
ven a relativert operation
e tsunami cthey might rts, it becohe main goals types of detude of debrt modeling e large obje
r debris loadative. Indeedearly discussesearch prop In the shortrifting of lat major porttle/Tacoma)
ebris: Simulpal Investigahe research
ely small tsuns through scurrents, be
impact. Womes feasibl of this propebris inside pris loading cstudies into
ect; and (2)
ding (e.g. Chd, as the ASsions indicateposed here wt term, the aarge vesselsts along the to both visu
lating ator is
team
unami strong come
With a le to posed ports, an be
o two two-
hapter SCE7 e that
would ability s has U.S.
ualize
and quanrecognizeestimate Guard, anthe poten
3.14 INIS
Keri Rya
ABSTRA
The objeexplicitlybuilds onthat vertiisolated wbearing aMore comdesign. Adevelop quantitie
Amodel wcomputatperformeinfluenceshaking ofunction parametecapture tthe superis accelement distributestudy wilintensityOpenSeeof 1.2).
ntify debris e the tsunamlocal impac
nd port/harbntial of these
NFLUENCESLOLATED
an
DetaiShakihighliProfeincludReno
ACT
ective of thisy consideredn prior NEEical shakingwith triple paxial force thmplete underApplication a holistic us.
A simplifiewill be devtional ed to undee of verticon bridge re
of keyers. The mthe vertical vrstructure spcomplished
discretizaed mass. A ll be conduc. The bridg
es under a suIsolation be
effects. Finami debris hazcts. Industrybor commissie hazards in t
E OF VERTD WITH FR
ils of the Ping on Desiighted below
essor of Civides Rushil M.
s seed projecd in the desS/E-Defense
g can increasendulum beahat is transmrstanding is to bridges,
understandin
ed bridge eloped and simulations
erstand the cal ground esponse as a y system model will vibration of pans, which
through ation and
parametric cted to undere seismic r
uite of grounearings will
ally, a workzard, and to sy in the eneions will be their local po
TICAL GRORICTION PE
PEER fundeign of Bridgw. The projeil EngineerinMojidra, Gr
ct is to answsign of bridge testing thatse both the arings. Vertimitted to theneeded to dedue to the
ng of the in
f
rstand how tesponse wild motions thbe modeled
26
kshop will bshow stakeh
ergy and carbrought tog
orts.
OUND SHAENDULUM
ed research ges Isolated ect Principalng, Universiraduate Stud
wer the questges with frit demonstratbase shear ical shaking e base shear evelop sensi
eir relative snfluence of
the base sheall be evaluahat best repred using sing
be organizedholders how rgo sectors, gether in the
AKING ON BEARING
project “Ind with Frictil Investigatoity of Nevaddent Resear
tion: “Shouliction penduted both expand the stor introduces aand can ex
ible guidelinsimplicity, i
f vertical sh
ar varies witated by respesents high vgle friction
d to demonsto use the das well as workshop a
DESIGN OS
nfluence of ion Penduluor is Keri L.da, Reno. Thcher, Unive
ld vertical grulum bearingperimentallyry acceleratia high-frequ
xcite higher snes for includis an ideal haking on r
th increasingponse historvertical seismpendulum
strate the nedeveloped too
the Navy, Cand will be sh
OF BRIDGE
Vertical Grum Bearings Ryan, Assohe research
ersity of Ne
round shakings?” The pr
y and numeriions in buil
uency variatistructural mding this effestarting poi
relevant resp
g vertical shary analysis umicity (V/Hbearing or
eed to ols to Coast hown
ES
round s” are ociate team vada,
ng be roject ically dings ion in
modes. fect in int to ponse
aking using
H ratio triple
27
friction pendulum elements, which use friction models to simulate the interaction of bearing axial force and lateral force. Increase in base shear and other effects for 3D shaking relative to 2D shaking will be evaluated, focusing on systematic trends that can be justified by fundamental engineering principles. A small project Advisory Board will be assembled to provide input in the design of the parametric study.
RESEARCH IMPACT
Performance-based design techniques are used for critical infrastructure that have seismic performance objectives beyond minimum code requirements. Highway bridges are a critical component of resilient transportation systems that support post-earthquake response and recovery. Seismic isolation techniques are recognized as an effective option to reliably achieve high post-earthquake performance objectives such as continuous operation. The influence of vertical shaking on the lateral response of systems with friction pendulum bearings has been identified as a potential shortcoming that may prevent achievement of envisioned performance objectives targeted through PEER performance-based earthquake engineering methodology. However, prior research has shown that the influence of vertical shaking can be reliably predicted through properly constructed models and analysis techniques. In this project, a thorough parametric study will lead to more complete understanding of the significance of vertical shaking on isolated bridges with a variety of response characteristics, and may ultimately lead to recommended changes in the design of bridges isolated with triple pendulum bearings. If it is concluded that vertical shaking should be considered, then follow-up work is anticipated to determine the specifics of design guidelines for seismically isolated bridges. Efforts to determine specifics should be driven by interaction and feedback with code committees, such as AASHTO or Caltrans.
3.15 DS
Ertugrul Tac
ABSTRA
The firsproject Californiprovide can be domains,planners,insurancebe launchby the prand it wiusers—thlike Wcontinuouthe proobjectivesynthesizproduce transportspecific sBridgeR from othbackbone
RESEAR
Once puband evolsource buby decispolicymacan bettestructura
DEVELOPMSEISMIC RI
ciroglu
DetaToolBridTaciGradRese
ACT
st objectiveis to deve
ia’s bridgesvarious datused by ex, including b, emergence researcherhed with conroject team ll be editablhrough a cr
Wikipedia—aus updating
oject team.e of the ze a comput
continuoustation networseismic bridwill inciden
her domains e of BridgeR
RCH IMPAC
blicly launchlve with conuilding blockion makers akers can beer prepare, pl damage is
MENT OF AISK ASSES
ails of the PElbox for R
dges” are higroglu, Profe
duate Studenearcher, UCL
e of this elop a dat. This datata and metaxperts from bridge engincy respondrs. The datantent that is from severae by direct inrowd-sourcinand by a
scripts deve. The secproject wiltational seisms performark. BridgeR
dge fragilitientally form t(e.g., first re
R, verify it, a
T
hed, the datantributions fks. The resuwho play i
etter prioritizplan, and remost likely t
A DATABASSSMENT O
EER funded Regional Sei
ghlighted beessor, UCLAnt ResearchLA.
proposed tabase of abase will adata that
multiple neers, city ders, and abase will harvested
al sources, nput from ng model automated eloped by cond-year ll be to mic “app”—
ance-based will produce
es, which withe blueprinesponders).
and apply it t
abase and itsfrom many uulting bridge-integral roleze critical b
eact to a powto occur.
28
SE AND A OF CALIFO
research prismic Risk elow. The pA. The res
her, UCLA
—BridgeR—seismic a
e quantitativill ultimatelynt for future Through the
to a set of tes
seismic appusers due to-specific seies in managbridges for rwerful earth
TOOLBOXRNIA’S HIG
roject “DeveAssessmen
project Princearch team and Peng-Y
—that will intassessments ve results in y enable reg
apps that we present prstbed bridge
p BridgeR wo its open-acismic safety/ging seismicretrofits; andhquake if th
X FOR REGGHWAY B
elopment of nt of Califocipal Investi
includes BYu Chen, G
teract with tof Califo
the form of gional econowill be deveoject, we aim
es in Los An
will have the ccess archite/loss informac risks. Thad emergencyhey know w
GIONAL RIDGES
a Database aornia’s Highigator is ErtBarbaros CeGraduate Stu
the databaseornia’s highsite- and fac
omic loss stueloped by exm to develo
ngeles.
potential to ecture and oation can be
at is, governy first-respo
where the gre
and a hway tugrul etiner, udent
e and hway cility-udies. xperts op the
grow open-
e used nment nders eatest
3.16 AEC
David San
ABSTRA
Previous can havedecreasinand increto shortemodels arelated to(M8 andimportanaftershoc
Tmodels earthquakand desigto mitigaon cyclicdesign ofNevada, analyses combinedThe framthat accocompanio
RESEAR
This projwhich arsubductioof high-smitigatinorganizat
ACCOUNTIEVALUATIOCOLLABOR
nders G
ACT
studies hav a significan
ng displacemeasing the riser-duration mand criteria ao long-duratid M9) earthnt for evaluacks and mult
The overall gand reco
ke duration gn of bridgeate the effectc deterioratif bridges. FoReno, that wwill be int
d effects of gmework will ount for earon projects a
RCH IMPAC
ject will devre especiallyon earthquakstrength rein
ng duration tions to impl
NG FOR EON AND DERATION)
reg Deierlein
ve shown thant effect on sment capacitysk of structumotions upoare based. Inion motions
hquakes, durating structurtiple earthqu
goal of this ommendation
in the peres. Related ot of duration ion to help our shake tawill be extenegrated throground-motibe applied t
rthquake durat the Univer
T
velop seismicy important kes are expenforcement impact. Th
lement the re
ARTHQUAESIGN OF
Details ofEarthquakDesign ohighlighteH. Sanderincludes JDeierlein,Mohamm
at earthquakstructural pery on the ord
ural collapseon which mn addition tofrom large
ration effectral performa
uake events.
project is tns for crformance a
objectives aron reinforcequalify the
able column nded throughough the PEion intensityto develop aration. The rsity of Neva
c design profor Norther
ected to occufor bridges
he PIs will esearch find
29
AKE DURABRIDGES
f the PEER fke Duration of Bridges ed below. Thrs, UniversitJohn Anders, Stanford ed, Dynamic
ke duration rformance, der of 25% compared
most design o concerns magnitude ts are also ance under
to develop onsidering assessment e as followsed concrete buse of highexperiment
h the use of aEER performy, spectral shand calibrate
proposed reada, Reno an
ovisions thatn California
ur. The projes in high se
work withdings into des
ATION IN P(UNR-STA
funded reseain Perform(UNR-Sta
he project Prty of Nevadson, Univer
Universityc Isolation S
s: (1) to devebridge piersh-strength rts will be coanalytical mmance-basedhape, and due performancesearch willnd Stanford
t account fora, Oregon, aect will also eismic regioh Caltrans, sign standar
ERFORMAANFORD
arch projectmance-Basedanford Collrincipal Inveda, Reno. Thrsity of Nevy; and MoServices.
elop improv; and (2) to l
reinforcemenonducted at t
modelling. Thd frameworkuration on strce-based desl be conducUniversity.
r earthquakeand Washingcontribute t
ons and devAASHTO,
rds.
ANCE-BAS
t “Accountind Evaluationlaboration)”estigator is Dhe research
vada, Reno; ohammed S
ved design dleverage resnt in the sethe Universihe test resultk to consideructural respsign requiremcted through
e duration efgton where to the reliablvelop detailACI, and
ED
ng for n and are
David team Greg
Saeed
details earch ismic ity of ts and er the ponse. ments h two
ffects, large
le use ls for other
3.17 FC
Minjie Z
ABSTRA
Building framewo(FSI) simFrom thescriptingfor a limilinear-elasections. incorporalanguagefor mathehave embcommunvisualizadevelopmOpenSeeOpenSeescripting the sccommunframewograduate have lundergra
RESEAR
This projimprove libraries variety oPFEM wapplicatiocomforta
FLUID–STRCAPABILIT
Zhu
DetPythPrinteam
ACT
upon recerk’s Python
mulation cape start of the, and to accited number astic triangl
However, ated under the, Tcl, in Opematical combraced moreity with n
ation, anment. es to Pythones keep pace
developmcientific ity and mrk more ac
students wlearned Pyaduates.
RCH IMPAC
ject will incthe user exavailable in
of Python-bawill supportons using th
able.
RUCTURE ITIES IN OPE
tails of the Phon Scriptinncipal Invesm includes M
nt advancesn scripting capabilities, weir developmomplish FSIof pre-exist
le elements hundreds ofhe Python umenSees is str
mputations. Re general, scnumerous lind web
Extending n will help e with new
ments from computing make the cessible to who likely ython as
T
crease the uxperience of n Python, e.ased applicatt the develohe nonlinear
INTERACTENSEES
PEER fundeng Capabilitistigator is MMichael H. S
s in OpenSapabilities a
which are bament, the FSI simulationting element
and beamf constitutivmbrella for Fring-based, pRecent trend
cientific langibraries for
user base of f OpenSees g., numpy, tions. The copment of structural m
30
TION AND P
ed research ies in OpenS
Minjie Zhu, Scott, Co-PI,
Sees, the goand to furthesed on the
SI modules inns in OpenSe
and materiam–column elve models aFSI and genepowerful, ands in scriptinguages such
numerical
OpenSees wwith a frienpandas, etc
continued defragility cu
models with
PYTHON S
project “FluSees” are higOregon Sta Oregon Sta
oals of this er develop iparticle finin OpenSeesees, Python al commandslements witand elementeral OpenSend easy to leng languagesas Python, w computing
with the popndlier user i., will allow
evelopment urves and owhich curre
SCRIPTING
uid-Structureghlighted beate Universiate Universit
project areits fluid–struite-element ms have been commands s available inth Concretet formulatioees use. The earn; howeves for engineewhich has eg, data ana
pular Pythointerface. Thw OpenSeesof OpenSeeother structent OpenSee
G
e Interactionelow. The prity. The resty.
e to expanducture interamethod (PFbased on Pyhave been an OpenSeese01/Steel01 ons remain toriginal scrier, it is not sering applicavolved to a alysis, scie
n interpreterhe wide arras to be usedes for FSI vitural enginees users feel
n and roject earch
d the action FEM). ython added , e.g., fiber
to be ipting suited ations large
entific
r and ay of
d in a ia the eering
most
31
3.18 PEER REPORTS 2017
PEER 2017/01 2016 PEER Annual Report. Khalid M. Mosalam, Amarnath Kasalanati, and Grace Kang. March 2017.
The Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center (PEER) is a multi-institutional research and education center with headquarters at the University of California, Berkeley. PEER’s mission is to develop, validate, and disseminate performance-based seismic design technologies for buildings and infrastructure to meet the diverse economic and safety needs of owners and society.
The year 2016 began with a change of leadership at PEER. On January 1, Professor Khalid Mosalam became the new PEER Director as Professor Stephen Mahin completed his 6- year term. Also in early 2016, Dr. Yousef Bozorgnia stepped down from the position of Executive Director, after serving as a key member of PEER’s management team for over 12 years. Several accomplishments of the Center during the leadership of Director Mahin were recounted during the PEER Annual Meeting on January 28–29, 2016. This meeting also set the course of the Center with several new thrust areas identified for future research.
During the past year, PEER has continued its track record of multi-institutional research with several multi-year Mega-Projects. The PEER Tall Buildings Initiative (TBI) was recently expanded to include assessment of the seismic performance of existing tall buildings. The California Earthquake Authority (CEA) awarded a $3.4 million, 3.5-year research contract to PEER to investigate the seismic performance of wood-frame homes with cripple walls. The project will directly contribute to the improvement of seismic resiliency of California’s housing stock. Former Director Mahin will lead a broad effort for computational modeling and simulation (SimCenter) of the effects of natural hazards on the built environment. Supported by a 5-year, $10.9-million grant from the National Science Foundation (NSF), the SimCenter is part of the Natural Hazards Engineering Research Infrastructure (NHERI) initiative, a distributed, multiuser national facility that will provide natural hazards engineers with access to research infrastructure (earthquake and wind engineering experimental facilities, cyberinfrastructure, computational modeling and simulation tools, and research data), coupled with education and community outreach activities.
In addition to the Mega Projects, PEER researchers were involved in a wide range of research activities in the areas of geohazards, tsunami, and the built environment focusing on the earthquake performance of old and new reinforced concrete and steel structures, tall buildings, and bridges including rapid bridge construction. As part of its mission, PEER participated in a wide range of education and outreach activities, including a summer internship program, seminars, OpenSees days, and participation in several national and international conferences. The Center became an active board member of two prominent international organizations, namely GADRI (Global Alliance of Disaster Research Institutes) and ILEE (International Laboratory of Earthquake Engineering). PEER researchers and projects were recognized with awards from several organizations.
Going forward, PEER aims to improve the profile and external exposure of the Center globally, strengthen the Business-Industry-Partnership (BIP) program, engage the Institutional Board (IB) and the Industry Advisory Board (IAB) to identify new areas of research, and explore new funding opportunities.
32
PEER 2017/02 U.S.–New Zealand–Japan Workshop: Liquefaction-Induced Ground Movements Effects, University of California, Berkeley, California, 2–4 November 2016. Jonathan D. Bray, Ross W. Boulanger, Misko Cubrinovski, Kohji Tokimatsu, Steven L. Kramer, Thomas O’Rourke, Ellen Rathje, Russell A. Green, Peter K. Robinson, and Christine Z. Beyzaei. March 2017.
There is much to learn from the recent New Zealand and Japan earthquakes. These earthquakes produced differing levels of liquefaction-induced ground movements that damaged buildings, bridges, and buried utilities. Along with the often spectacular observations of infrastructure damage, there were many cases where well-built facilities located in areas of liquefaction-induced ground failure were not damaged. Researchers are working on characterizing and learning from these observations of both poor and good performance.
The “Liquefaction-Induced Ground Movements Effects” workshop provided an opportunity to take advantage of recent research investments following these earthquake events to develop a path forward for an integrated understanding of how infrastructure performs with various levels of liquefaction. Fifty-five researchers in the field, two-thirds from the U.S. and one-third from New Zealand and Japan, convened in Berkeley, California, in November 2016. The objective of the workshop was to identify research thrusts offering the greatest potential for advancing our capabilities for understanding, evaluating, and mitigating the effects of liquefaction-induced ground movements on structures and lifelines. The workshop also advanced the development of younger researchers by identifying promising research opportunities and approaches, and promoting future collaborations among participants.
During the workshop, participants identified five cross-cutting research priorities that need to be addressed to advance our scientific understanding of and engineering procedures for soil liquefaction effects during earthquakes. Accordingly, this report was organized to address five research themes: (1) case history data; (2) integrated site characterization; (3) numerical analysis; (4) challenging soils; and (5) effects and mitigation of liquefaction in the built environment and communities. These research themes provide an integrated approach toward transformative advances in addressing liquefaction hazards worldwide.
The archival documentation of liquefaction case history datasets in electronic data repositories for use by the broader research community is critical to accelerating advances in liquefaction research. Many of the available liquefaction case history datasets are not fully documented, published, or shared. Developing and sharing well-documented liquefaction datasets reflect significant research efforts. Therefore, datasets should be published with a permanent DOI, with appropriate citation language for proper acknowledgment in publications that use the data.
Integrated site characterization procedures that incorporate qualitative geologic information about the soil deposits at a site and the quantitative information from in situ and laboratory engineering tests of these soils are essential for quantifying and minimizing the uncertainties associated site characterization. Such information is vitally important to help identify potential failure modes and guide in situ testing. At the site scale, one potential way to do this is to use proxies for depositional environments. At the fabric and microstructure scale, the use of multiple in situ tests that induce different levels of strain should be used to characterize soil properties.
33
The development of new in situ testing tools and methods that are more sensitive to soil fabric and microstructure should be continued. The development of robust, validated analytical procedures for evaluating the effects of liquefaction on civil infrastructure persists as a critical research topic. Robust validated analytical procedures would translate into more reliable evaluations of critical civil infrastructure iv performance, support the development of mechanics-based, practice-oriented engineering models, help eliminate suspected biases in our current engineering practices, and facilitate greater integration with structural, hydraulic, and wind engineering analysis capabilities for addressing multi-hazard problems. Effective collaboration across countries and disciplines is essential for developing analytical procedures that are robust across the full spectrum of geologic, infrastructure, and natural hazard loading conditions encountered in practice.
There are soils that are challenging to characterize, to model, and to evaluate, because their responses differ significantly from those of clean sands: they cannot be sampled and tested effectively using existing procedures, their properties cannot be estimated confidently using existing in situ testing methods, or constitutive models to describe their responses have not yet been developed or validated. Challenging soils include but are not limited to: interbedded soil deposits, intermediate (silty) soils, mine tailings, gravelly soils, crushable soils, aged soils, and cemented soils. New field and laboratory test procedures are required to characterize the responses of these materials to earthquake loadings, physical experiments are required to explore mechanisms, and new soil constitutive models tailored to describe the behavior of such soils are required. Well-documented case histories involving challenging soils where both the poor and good performance of engineered systems are documented are also of high priority.
Characterizing and mitigating the effects of liquefaction on the built environment requires understanding its components and interactions as a system, including residential housing, commercial and industrial buildings, public buildings and facilities, and spatially distributed infrastructure, such as electric power, gas and liquid fuel, telecommunication, transportation, water supply, wastewater conveyance/treatment, and flood protection systems. Research to improve the characterization and mitigation of liquefaction effects on the built environment is essential for achieving resiliency. For example, the complex mechanisms of ground deformation caused by liquefaction and building response need to be clarified and the potential bias and dispersion in practice-oriented procedures for quantifying building response to liquefaction need to be quantified. Component-focused and system performance research on lifeline response to liquefaction is required. Research on component behavior can be advanced by numerical simulations in combination with centrifuge and large-scale soil–structure interaction testing. System response requires advanced network analysis that accounts for the propagation of uncertainty in assessing the effects of liquefaction on large, geographically distributed systems. Lastly, research on liquefaction mitigation strategies, including aspects of ground improvement, structural modification, system health monitoring, and rapid recovery planning, is needed to identify the most effective, cost efficient, and sustainable measures to improve the response and resiliency of the built environment.
34
PEER 2017/03 NGA-East Ground-Motion Models for the U.S. Geological Survey National Seismic Hazard Maps. Christine A. Goulet, Yousef Bozorgnia, Nicolas Kuehn, Linda Al Atik, Robert R. Youngs, Robert W. Graves, and Gail M. Atkinson. March 2017.
The purpose of this report is to provide a set of ground motion models (GMMs) to be considered by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) for their National Seismic Hazard Maps (NSHMs) for the Central and Eastern U.S. (CEUS). These interim GMMs are adjusted and modified from a set of preliminary models developed as part of the Next Generation Attenuation for Central and Eastern North-America (CENA) project (NGA-East). The NGA-East objective was to develop a new ground-motion characterization (GMC) model for the CENA region. The GMC model consists of a set of GMMs for median and standard deviation of ground motions and their associated weights in the logic-tree for use in probabilistic seismic hazard analysis (PSHA).
NGA-East is a large multidisciplinary project coordinated by the Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center (PEER), at the University of California, Berkeley. The project has two components: (1) a set of scientific research tasks, and (2) a model-building component following the framework of the “Seismic Senior Hazard Analysis Committee (SSHAC) Level 3” [Budnitz et al. 1997; NRC 2012]. Component (2) is built on the scientific results of component (1) of the NGA-East Project. This report does not document the final NGA-East model under (2), but instead presents interim GMMs for use in the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) National Seismic Hazard Maps.
Under component (1) of NGA-East, several scientific issues were addressed, including: (a) development of a new database of empirical data recorded in CENA; (b) development of a regionalized ground-motion map for CENA, (c) definition of the reference site condition; (d) simulations of ground motions based on different methodologies, (e) development of numerous GMMs for CENA, and (f) the development of the current report. The scientific tasks of NGA-East were all documented as a series of PEER reports.
This report documents the GMMs recommended by the authors for consideration by the USGS for their NSHM. The report documents the key elements involved in the development of the proposed GMMs and summarizes the median and aleatory models for ground motions along with their recommended weights. The models presented here build on the work from the authors and aim to globally represent the epistemic uncertainty in ground motions for CENA.
The NGA-East models for the USGS NSHMs includes a set of 13 GMMs defined for 25 ground-motion intensity measures, applicable to CENA in the moment magnitude range of 4.0 to 8.2 and covering distances up to 1500 km. Standard deviation models are also provided for general PSHA applications (ergodic standard deviation). Adjustment factors are provided for hazard computations involving the Gulf Coast region.
PEER 2017/04 Expert Panel Recommendations for Ergodic Site Amplification in Central and Eastern North America. Jonathan P. Stewart, Grace A Parker, Joseph P. Harmon, Gail M. Atkinson, David M. Boore, Robert B. Darragh, Walter J. Silva, and Youssef M.A. Hashash. March 2017.
The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) national seismic hazard maps have historically been produced for a reference site condition of VS30 = 760 m/sec (where VS30 is time averaged shear wave velocity in the upper 30 m of the site). The resulting ground motions are modified
35
for five site classes (A-E) using site amplification factors for peak acceleration and ranges of short- and long-oscillator periods. As a result of Project 17 recommendations, this practice is being revised: (1) maps will be produced for a range of site conditions (as represented by VS30) instead of a single reference condition; and (2) the use of site factors for period ranges is being replaced with period-specific factors over the period range of interest (approximately 0.1 to 10 sec). Since the development of the current framework for site amplification factors in 1992, the technical basis for the site factors used in conjunction with the USGS hazard maps has remained essentially unchanged, with only one modification (in 2014). The approach has been to constrain site amplification for low-to-moderate levels of ground shaking using inference from observed ground motions (approximately linear site response), and to use ground response simulations (recently combined with observations) to constrain nonlinear site response. Both the linear and nonlinear site response has been based on data and geologic conditions in the western U.S. (an active tectonic region). This project and a large amount of previous and contemporaneous related research (e.g., NGA-East Geotechnical Working Group for site response) has sought to provide an improved basis for the evaluation of ergodic site amplification in central and eastern North America (CENA). The term ‘ergodic’ in this context refers to regionally-appropriate, but not site-specific, site amplification models (i.e., models are appropriate for CENA generally, but would be expected to have bias for any particular site). The specific scope of this project was to review and synthesize relevant research results so as to provide recommendations to the USGS for the modeling of ergodic site amplification in CENA for application in the next version of USGS maps.
The panel assembled for this project recommends a model provided as three terms that are additive in natural logarithmic units. Two describe linear site amplification. One of these describes VS30-scaling relative to a 760 m/sec reference, is largely empirical, and has several distinct attributes relative to models for active tectonic regions. The second linear term adjusts site amplification from the 760 m/sec reference to the CENA reference condition (used with NGA-East ground motion models) of VS =3000 m/sec; this second term is simulation-based. The panel is also recommending a nonlinear model, which is described in a companion report [Hashash et al. 2017a]. All median model components are accompanied by models for epistemic uncertainty.
The models provided in this report are recommended for application by the USGS and other entities. The models are considered applicable for VS30 = 200–2000 m/sec site conditions and oscillator periods of 0.08–5 sec. Finally, it should be understood that as ergodic models, they lack attributes that may be important for specific sites, such as resonances at site periods. Sites-specific analyses are recommended to capture such effects for significant projects and for any site condition with VS30 < 200 m/sec. We recommend that future site response models for hazard applications consider a two-parameter formulation that includes a measure of site period in addition to site stiffness.
PEER 2017/05 Recommendations for Ergodic Nonlinear Site Amplification in Central and Eastern North America. Youssef M.A. Hashash, Joseph A. Harmon, Okan Ilhan, Grace A. Parker, and Jonathan P. Stewart. March 2017.
This document is a companion report to Expert Panel Recommendation for Ergodic Linear Site Amplification Models in central and eastern North America (PEER Report No. 2017/04,
36
Stewart et al. 2017). This report describes the panel recommendations for ergodic median nonlinear site amplification models, which are meant to accompany linear models in the companion report. Nonlinear models for site amplification must represent the strength of the input ground motion in some manner, and peak acceleration for a reference condition (PGAr) is often used. The use of PGAr (and similar parameters) requires specification of a reference condition in the development of nonlinear models, and those provided here consider reference conditions of VS = 3000 m/sec and VS30 = 760 m/sec. One of the proposed models (the GWG-S nonlinear amplification model) is derived for a reference condition of VS = 3000 m/sec. A second is identical to the first except that PGAr is adjusted to a VS30 = 760 m/sec reference condition. Nonlinear amplification models in this report are produced as functions of VS30 and (PGAr). Other models evaluated in this report are the PEA nonlinear amplification model and the GWG-S model with an alternative approach to convert GWG-S nonlinear amplification model estimations to a VS30 = 760 m/sec reference condition. A recommended epistemic uncertainty model on the GWG-S recommended median nonlinear amplification models is provided in piecewise functional form to generate reasonable variation of Fnl across the period and VS30 ranges of interest. Limitations on the recommended models are presented considering both the methodology of the recommended model derivation and limitations of nonlinear amplification models in general.
PEER 2017/06 Guidelines for Performance-Based Seismic Design of Tall Buildings, Version 2.01. Version 2.0, prepared by a TBI Working Group led by co-chairs Ron Hamburger and Jack Moehle: Jack Baker, Jonathan Bray, C.B. Crouse, Greg Deierlein, John Hooper, Marshall Lew, Joe Maffei, Stephen Mahin, James Malley, Farzad Naeim, Jonathan Stewart, and John Wallace. May 2017.
These Seismic Design Guidelines for Tall Buildings present a recommended alternative to the prescriptive procedures for seismic design of buildings contained in the ASCE 7 standard and the International Building Code (IBC). The intended audience includes structural engineers and building officials engaged in seismic design and review of tall buildings. Properly executed, these Guidelines are intended to result in buildings that are capable of reliably achieving the seismic performance objectives intended by ASCE 7, and in some aspects, and where specifically noted, somewhat superior performance to such objectives. Individual users may adapt and modify these Guidelines to serve as the basis for designs intended to achieve higher seismic performance objectives than specifically intended herein.
The Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center published a first edition of these Guidelines in 2010 in response to the growing use of alternative performance-based approaches for seismic design of tall buildings. Major innovations introduced in that volume included: use of Service-Level Earthquake (SLE) shaking to evaluate building response to frequent earthquakes coupled with a specific collapse-resistance evaluation for Maximum Considered Earthquake (MCER) shaking, use of nonlinear dynamic analysis; explicit evaluation of global, system-based performance criteria in addition to individual element or member-based criteria; introduction of the concept of critical and non-critical elements; and explicit evaluation of cladding adequacy for MCER demands.
In the time since the publication of the 2010 Guidelines, the profession has gained substantial experience in application of these techniques to design of buildings around the world, and, in particular, the western United States. Also, the ASCE 7 standard has been amended substantially, in no small part based on influence from the first edition of this document.
37
Additionally, significant advances have been made in nonlinear analytical capability and in defining ground motions for use in nonlinear seismic analysis. Initially, buildings designed using performance-based procedures were assigned to Risk Category II; these buildings were structurally regular and typically utilized concrete core wall systems for lateral resistance. Individual project development teams have extended the use of performance-based seismic design of tall buildings to encompass other structural systems, building complexes that include irregular structures and multiple towers on a single podium, and numerous structures assigned to higher Risk Categories. This second edition addresses lessons learned in application of the first edition on many projects and the conditions, knowledge, and state-of-practice that presently exist.
These Guidelines include the seismic design of structural elements normally assigned as part of the seismic-force-resisting system as well as structural elements whose primary function is to support gravity loads. Except for exterior cladding, design of nonstructural components is not specifically included within the scope of these Guidelines. Design for nonstructural systems should conform to the applicable requirements of the building code or other suitable alternatives that consider the unique response characteristics of tall buildings.
PEER 2017/07 A Nonlinear Kinetic Model for Multi-Stage Friction Pendulum Systems. Paul L. Drazin and Sanjay Govindjee. October 2017.
Multi-stage friction pendulum systems (MSFPs), or more specifically the triple friction pendulum (TFP), are currently being developed as seismic isolation devices for buildings and other large structures. However, all current models are inadequate in properly modeling all facets of these devices. Either the model can only handle uni-directional ground motions while incorporating the kinetics of the TFP system, or the model ignores the kinetics and only models bi-directional motion. And in all cases, the model is linearized to simplify the equations.
This paper presents an all-in-one model that incorporates the full nonlinear kinetics of the TFP system while allowing for bi-directional ground motion. In this way, the model presented here is the most complete single model currently available. The model is developed in such a way that allows for easy expansion to any standard type of MSFP, simply by following the procedure outlined in this report.
It was found that the nonlinear model can more accurately predict the experimental results for large displacements due to the nonlinear kinematics used to describe the system. It is also shown that the inertial effects of TFP system are negligible in normal operating regimes, however, in the event of uplift, the inertial effects may become significant. The model is also able to accurately predict the experimental results for complicated bi-directional ground motions.
PEER 2017/08 Influence of Kinematic SSI on Foundation Input Motions for Bridges on Deep Foundations. Benjamin J. Turner, Scott J. Brandenberg, and Jonathan P. Stewart. November 2017.
Seismic design of bridges and other pile-supported structures often utilizes a substructure method of dynamic analysis in which the foundation elements are not explicitly modeled but are replaced by springs and dashpots representing the foundation impedance. The ground motion appropriate for input to the free end of the springs, known as the “foundation input
38
motion” (FIM), differs from the free-field motion (FFM) due to the difference in stiffness and deformation characteristics between the pile(s) and soil, which is typically overlooked in practice. Results of a parametric study of the influence of kinematic pile–soil interaction on FIM are presented. One dimensional nonlinear ground response analyses were used to define free-field motions, which were subsequently imposed on a beam-on-nonlinear-dynamic-Winkler-foundation pile model. The free-field ground surface motion and top-of-pile FIM computed from these results were then used to compute transfer functions and spectral ratios for use with the substructure method of seismic analysis. A total of 1920 parametric combinations of different pile sizes, soil profiles, and ground motions were analyzed.
Results of the study show that significant reductions of the FFM occur for stiff piles in soft soil, which could result in a favorable reduction in design demands for short-period structures. Group effects considering spatially-variable (incoherent) ground motions are found to be minor over the footprint of a typical bridge bent, resulting in an additional reduction of FFM by 10% or less compared to an equivalent single pile.
This study aims to overcome limitations of idealistic assumptions that have been employed in previous studies such as linear-elastic material behavior, drastically simplified stratigraphy, and harmonic oscillations in lieu of real ground motions. In order to capture the important influence of more realistic conditions such as material nonlinearity, subsurface heterogeneity, and variable frequency-content ground motions, a set of models for predicting transfer functions and spectral ratios has been developed through statistical regression of the results from this parametric study. These allow foundation engineers to predict kinematic pile–soil interaction effects without performing dynamic pile analyses.
While previously available elastic analytical models are shown to be capable of predicting the average results of this study, they do not adequately reflect the amount of variability in the results that arises from consideration of more realistic conditions. The new model is also used to re-examine available case history data that could not be explained by existing models.
PEER 2017/09 “R” Package for Computation of Earthquake Ground-Motion Response Spectra Pengfei Wang, Jonathan P. Stewart, Yousef Bozorgnia, David M. Boore, and Tadahiro Kishida. December 2017.
Earthquake ground motions are typically recorded with one vertical and two horizontal components. It has become standard practice to represent the horizontal component of ground shaking in a manner that recognizes a range of amplitudes with changing azimuths. These variable amplitudes can be generically denoted RotDxx, where xx indicates the percentile of the horizontal amplitude range. RotDxx representations of ground motion are used with amplitude parameters (peak acceleration and velocity) as well as response spectral ordinates for a range of oscillator periods. The use of RotDxx ground motions was introduced in the NGA-West2 project, and analysis procedures for their computation were originally developed in Fortran by the fourth author of this report. Here we describe the implementation of these analysis procedures in R, resulting in an “R” package referred to as Rotated Combination of Two-Component ground motions (RCTC). We describe related algorithms for recovering accurate peak quantities from digital data (i.e., Sinc-interpolation and subset selection), which are also implemented in RCTC. We verify the code outputs by comparing them with a prior Fortran code. RCTC takes as input two horizontal components of ground
39
motion, their azimuths, and their time step, and returns various types of variables, including pseudo spectral acceleration for each horizontal component, RotDxx for xx=0, 50, 100% as well as earlier, orientation-independent, geometric mean parameter GMRotI50. Other period-independent variables are also computed and outputted. We document here the code
verification and provide instructions for its use.
PEER 2017/10 Development of Time Histories for IEEE693 Testing and Analysis (Including Seismically Isolated Equipment). Shakhzod M. Takhirov, Eric Fujisaki, Leon Kempner, Michael Riley, and Brian Low. December 2017
This study was undertaken to address new developments in IEEE P693/D16 [IEEE693 WG 2017], account for the new strong-motion records from the recent major earthquakes, and assess their effects on the spectral demand. A large set of both crustal and subduction type records was investigated based on a number of parameters and intensity measures. The best candidates were selected as seed motions. The motions were matched to the IEEE693 spectrum in a time domain at 5% damping, which follows the guidance of IEEE P693/D16 [IEEE693 WG 2017]. In addition, three three-component synthetic time histories were generated. All modified and generated time histories were arranged into a suite of time histories proposed for use in IEEE693 seismic qualification analysis and testing. The suite consisted of four IEEE693-spectrum-compatible time histories modified from crustal records, one IEEE693-spectrum-compatible time history modified from a subduction record, and three IEEE693-spectrum-compatible synthetic time histories. The spectral matching was conducted with a tight tolerance to remain within a 15% strip above the IEEE693 spectra in a wide-frequency range. It was shown that the conservatism of the IEEE693 spectrum is different for crustal and subduction type records. Based on the results of the investigation, the study summarizes the basis for changes to the requirements for development of input time histories given in IEEE P693/D16, and considerations for input motion specifications for a future edition of the standard.
PEER 2017/11 Preliminary Studies on the Dynamic Response of a Seismically Isolated Prototype Gen-IV Sodium-Cooled Fast Reactor (PGSFR). Benshun Shao, Andreas H. Schellenberg, Matthew J. Schoettler, and Stephen A. Mahin, December 2017.
The KEPCO Engineering and Construction Company, Inc. (KEPCO E&C) is developing a Prototype Gen-IV Sodium-Cooled Fast Reactor (PGSFR). Preliminary evaluations of the behavior of the isolated PGSFR when subjected to seismic and aircraft impact loading conditions were conducted to support design efforts by KEPCO E&C. Results and key findings of these analyses are as follows: (i) because isolator deformations are typically quite small for the considered seismic excitation levels, the benefit of seismic isolation could be enhanced with revised isolator designs that reduce the apparent yield strength and permit greater displacement demands; (ii) the amplitudes of acceleration and displacement responses resulting from the impact of a large aircraft are similar to or exceed the demands imposed by a seismic event based on the NRC hazard with a peak ground acceleration of 0.3g, and (iii) as provided, the isolator initial stiffness is poorly conditioned since it leads to fundamental isolation frequencies that are not well separated from the plant’s superstructure frequencies, and triggers some resonance that significantly increases floor acceleration response spectra.
40
PEER2017/12 Experimental Investigation of the Behavior of Vintage and Retrofit Concentrically Braced Steel Frames under Cyclic Loading. Barbara G. Simpson, Stephen A. Mahin, and Jiun-Wei Lai. December 2017.
The parallel evolution of seismic design provisions and braced-frame research has led to inconsistencies between the design and construction of braced frames and the development of modern seismic design codes and now-typical detailing requirements. Since literature on concentrically braced frames (CBFs) spans over several decades, existing older or vintage concentrically braced frames–especially those designed prior 1988–may be prone to a number of deficiencies that are now limited in new CBFs due to contemporary seismic design requirements.
The number and range of these deficiencies and their likely interdependence, makes assessing the likely behavior of vintage braced frame systems problematic. Recent research has focused on improving the seismic behavior of modern braced frame systems, such as the Special Concentrically Braced Frame (SCBF). In contrast, relatively little research has focused on existing braced frames, even though vintage CBFs may be characterized by distinctly different behavior from modern SCBFs. Component tests of non-compact braces and connections and documented failures during past earthquakes have shown that vintage CBFs may be vulnerable to a number of complex damage states, including limited deformability and energy-dissipation capacity of the braces, potentially brittle connection failures, beam yielding in V- or chevron configurations, etc.
To improve this situation, experiments of complete sub-assemblages of vintage braced frame systems are needed to improve understanding of seismic response, assess the feasibility and efficacy of possible retrofit strategies, and calibrate computational models for future parametric studies. This report presents results of experiments and related analyses performed on vintage CBF specimens. Cyclic quasi-static tests were performed on three full-scale CBF specimens. A common two-story, one-bay configuration was adopted. The first specimen was representative of a pre-1988 CBF incorporating hollow HSS braces. The second specimen was similar, but the HSS braces were filled with concrete. The third specimen incorporated a mast (or strongback) retrofit and other features intended to mitigate the weak-story behavior observed in the first two specimens.
The first test structure utilized square HSS braces placed in a “chevron” configuration with one column oriented in strong-axis bending and the other in weak-axis bending. The first specimen was designed according to the 1985 Uniform Building Code; as such, it did not satisfy many requirements of current seismic design codes. These inadequacies were typical of vintage construction and included high brace width-to-thickness ratios, weak gusset connections lacking adequate yield-lines, weak beams designed without consideration of an unbalanced load that may arise due to brace buckling, and no capacity design considerations in proportioning members or connections. This specimen formed a weak story in the second floor, while the rest of the frame experienced only minor yielding and little permanent damage. Both second-story braces buckled–exhibiting considerable local buckling at the brace midpoint–and then fractured within a few additional cycles. Since the imposed story drifts were modest, the frame was subsequently repaired. The fractured second-story braces and gussets were replaced with the same sections.
41
The new braces in the “second” test specimen were filled with low-strength concrete in an effort to postpone brace local buckling and fracture observed during the first experiment. Net section reinforcement was also added at all the brace-to-gusset connections. Testing of the second specimen also resulted in a weak-story mechanism but in the bottom story. Delayed local buckling and subsequent fracture was observed in one of the bottom-story braces. After fracture of this brace, the frame tended to behave like an eccentrically braced frame (EBF) with a long link beam. This beam provided a relatively weak and flexible energy-dissipating mechanism. Many different local failure mechanisms were observed during subsequent loading cycles, including nearly-complete fracture at one column-to-baseplate interface, significant local buckling, and multiple connection weld and base metal failures.
The third specimen utilized a “strongback” (SB) retrofit aimed at alleviating the weak-story behavior seen in both the first and second experimental tests. The SB system employs a steel truss “backbone” that is designed to remain essentially elastic. This truss enforces similar drift demands in adjacent stories to delay or prevent weak-story behavior. The retrofit design was composed of two halves: an “inelastic” truss utilizing a buckling-restrained brace (BRB) that dissipated seismic input energy and an “elastic” vertical truss designed to control weak-story behavior. The specimen was successful in imposing nearly uniform drifts over the full height of the frame throughout the duration of the test. These preliminary experimental results show that the SB system can be an effective means in limiting weak-story mechanisms.
A number of numerical simulations were calibrated to the experimental results. These analytical models are capable of predicting the observed behavior. The models developed adequately simulated the observed brace global buckling, braces fatigue, column-to-baseplate fracture, and the overall global response of the test specimens.
42
4 E
PEER oryear. Sevpresentedin the fol
4.1 P
Industry annual doin PEERproductsinterests.needs at students
PEER arplan, its r
ABIP proggovernm(IHI) join
Director M
Events
rganized sevven (7) studd their workllowing secti
PEER BIP P
and governmonation, the
R research a. Researcher Business anstudent-orgaand faculty.
re members research proj
As one of its gram, and d
ment agenciesned the prog
Mosalam with BIP
s and O
veral events dents partic
k in PEER seions.
PROGRAM
ment partnerPEER Busi
and educatirs share indind Industry anized semin
of an Industjects, implem
strategic godeveloping s. The BIP
gram. Below
P Members at a R
Outreac
and was incipated in Peminar serie
M
rs are an intiness and Indon programividual reseaPartners are
nars, where t
try Advisorymentation of
oals, PEER iextended tieprogram wais a listing o
Recent Gathering
43
ch Act
nvolved in nPEER summ
s. Highlight
tegral part odustry Partn
ms, and provarch plans ane invited to pthey also hav
Psummarthe PEEstate-of-workshoPEER IndustryrepresenPartnersgovernm
y Board (IAf research re
s focusing oes with the as revampedof PEER’s cu
tivities
numerous oumer internshits of the outr
of the researcnership (BIP)vides accessnd findings present recenve the oppor
PEER holdrize researchER researchf-the-art ops on selemission, a
y Partnersntatives of ship plus ment agenc
AB), which aesults, and ne
on increasing structural
d in 2017, aurrent Busin
s
utreach activip program.reach activit
ch program ) Program ins to PEER with partnent projects artunity to int
ds frequenh progress ah program. and statected topicsand invitess to atthe Busine
representacies providiadvises PEERew opportun
g the depth afirms and s
and an interness & Indus
vities in the Several exties are pres
at PEER. Fnvolves mem
researchersers having siand technoloteract with P
nt meetingsand seek inp
PEER also te-of-the-pras related tos Business ttend. Seless and Indatives of ing fundingR on its stra
nities for fun
and breadth state and fernational mestry Partners
e past xperts ented
For an mbers s and imilar ogical PEER
s to ut on runs
actice o the
and lected dustry
key g for ategic ding.
of its ederal ember s:
Sustaini
Annual M
4.2 S
member
S
ng Partners
Californ
Californ
Pacific
Members:
Arx-Pax
Bechtel
Degenk
Expone
FM Glo
Forell/E
Holmes
IHI Cor
Micron
SAGE E
Skidmo
Walter
Wiss, Ja
SUMMER 2
of a research
ome of the p
Implem
AnalytiSimulat
DevelopConver
s:
nia Departm
nia Earthqua
Gas & Elect
x
l Corporation
kolb Enginee
ent
obal
Elsesser Eng
s Structures
rporation, Ja
Optics
Engineers
ore, Owings
P Moore
anney, Elstn
017 INTER
h team.
projects the i
mentation of H
ical Investigtion
pment of a sion
ment of Trans
ake Authorit
tric Compan
n
ers
gineers, Inc.
apan
& Merrill LL
ner Associate
RNSHIP PR
In theprovidunderg(UNINpartici
advisoexperiresearc
interns partic
Hybrid Simu
gation of th
Hydraulic P
44
sportation (C
y (CEA)
ny (PG&E)
LP
es, Inc.
ROGRAM
e summer oded a uniqugraduate stuNORTE) anipate in state
Internship or and a graience on lech and give
cipated in th
ulation with
he Effect o
Power Conv
Caltrans)
of 2017, theue opportun
udents from nd Americae-of-the-art r
participantsaduate studeearning howen the opp
his summer i
Online Mod
of Time D
version Cha
e PEER Intnity for se
m the Univeran Universitresearch.
s were paireent mentor. w to condortunity to
included:
deling Updat
elay on Re
ain for Ocea
ternship Proeven outstanrsidad del Nty of Beiru
ed with a faStudents g
duct indepenparticipate
ting
eal-Time H
an Wave En
ogram nding Norte ut to
aculty ained ndent as a
Hybrid
nergy
4.3 U
RResearchearthquakmaterialsinteractioBridges Officials
4.4 P
resilient rebar yie
N“ResearcInformatset-up; teshell, andand measwas condYingjie W
Pground mwere rank1 points,
PerformConcret
PerformMaking
Analyti
UNR BECO
ThComeUNpevodo
Research testh activities ke protectivs, non-structon. Faculty and Structu(AASHTO)
PEER BRID
columns welding, and co
Nineteen teamch & Acadeion providedested materid the grout; sured acceleducted by a Wu, Selim G
articipating motions, whiked in the orrespectively
mance-based te Frames
mance-based g on Highwa
ical Study of
MES A NE
he Universitore Institutioembership sNR may apperiod, the repoting rights,ocuments as
ting facilitiesinclude a
ve systems, fural systemswork close
ures of the ) in Washing
DGE BENT
ere confinemolumn rocki
ms participaemic” and “d to the conial propertieconstructionerations on tteam that co
Günay, and K
teams were ich led to a rder of increy. Scores for
Evaluation
Earthquakeay Bridge De
f the Stability
EW PEER C
ty of Nevadaon Member status has duply for full Cpresentative and UNR one of PEER
s at UNR inaccelerated fluid–structus, performanely with theAmerican A
gton DC.
BLIND PR
InccB
ment provideng allowed a
ated in the Practicing Entestants inces for reinfon sequence inthe table foronsisted of AKhalid Mosa
asked to pretotal of 117
easing error; r all quantiti
45
of Infill Wa
e Engineerinesign and Re
y of Thin W
CORE INST
a, Reno (UNby the PEE
uration of thCore membee of UNR o
will be liR’s Core Ins
nclude two gbridge co
ure interactionce-based dee TechnicalAssociation
REDICTION
n October 2ontest for aentering res
Berkeley shaed by steel jat the base.
competitionEngineers” ccluded structorcing (mildncluding phor each test. TArpit Nema lam of UC B
edict 13 resp7 quantities.the 1st, 2nd
ies were sum
all Effects o
ng Methodoletrofit
Walls in Colom
TITUTION M
NR) was adER Institutiohree years, ership. Durin
on the Instituisted on thestitutions.
geotechnical onstruction, on (FSI/tsunesign, remotl Committee
of State H
N CONTEST
2017, PEER a bridge bensilient columaking table. ackets, ener
n, where thcategories wtural drawin
d and prestreotographs; pThe Blind Pand Jose Re
Berkeley.
ponse quanti. For each p
d, 3rd, and 4tmmed for ea
on Code-desi
logy for Inf
mbian Build
MEMBER
dded as a PEonal Board. and at the eng the threeutional Boare PEER we
labs and twanchor-zon
nami inundate sensing, aes of the SHighway an
T
organized ant that consimns tested oOther uniqurgy dissipati
he numbers were 10 andngs of the spessing) stee
properties of Prediction teestrepo of U
ities for eachpredicted quth teams recach team, an
igned Reinfo
formed Deci
dings
EER Transit The transitend of that
e-year transitrd will haveebsite and
wo structural ne performation), innovand soil–struSubcommitted Transport
a blind predisted of two
on the PEERue features oion via unbo
of teams ind 9, respectipecimen and
el, concrete, f the mass blesting experiC San Diego
h of the appluantity, the teived 8, 5, 3
nd the teams
forced
ision-
tional tional time,
tional e full other
labs. mance, vative ucture ee on tation
iction self-
R UC of the onded
n the ively. d test steel
locks; iment o and
lied 9 teams 3, and s with
46
the highest score in each category were declared the winners. The winners were announced at the PEER Annual Meeting held at UC Berkeley in January 18–19, 2018.
In addition to the predictions, the contestants were asked to provide a range that they thought the measured response would be within with 80% probability. Statistical evaluation of the competition results is in progress and will be published in the form of scholarly papers and a PEER report soon.
More information about the competition can be accessed from: http://peer.berkeley.edu/prediction_contest/. The experimental results are posted on the contest website, and contestants are encouraged to compare their predictions with these results, update their models according to the test results, and provide any feedback to PEER on improved modeling. Although the competition is completed, information required to develop analytical models and the corresponding experimental results are still available on the website; therefore, members of the earthquake engineering community are welcome to use these data and information to continue developing analytical models.
4.5 PEER-TSRP FUNDS 6 SEED AND 11 FULL PROPOSALS
PEER has continuing funding from the State of California related to the seismic performance of transportation systems. This funding supports the Transportation Systems Research Program (TSRP), the purpose of which is to lessen the impacts of earthquakes on the transportation systems of California, including highways and bridges, port facilities, high-speed rail, and airports. In September 2017, PEER issued a request for proposals, “Solicitation PEER TSRP 17-01” for one- and two-year projects aligned with the current TSRP research priorities and vision.
In response to “Solicitation PEER TSRP 17-01,” 47 outstanding proposals were received, covering 16 different issues in the broad domains of: Geotechnical Engineering (G), PBEE of Bridges and Other Transportation Systems (S), PBEE Methodology (M), PBEE Tools (T), and Areas of Application (A). All proposals were grouped into two categories: 13 seed proposals of $50,000 total budget or less and 34 full proposals of more than $50,000 total budget. Each proposal received three independent reviews from members of the PEER Research Committee. Based on the priorities of the pre-set strategic plan, pre-defined evaluation criteria that was specified in the RFP, and factors such as the PI qualifications and level of engagement of as many of the PEER core institutes as possible, 17 new projects were approved: 6 seed projects and 11 full projects, comprising a total of 17 projects funded for over $1 million.
Two of the 11 full projects involve collaborations of PEER core campuses. One project is a collaboration between PEER core campuses Stanford University and UNR, and another project is a collaboration between a PEER core campus, UC Davis and Forell/Elsesser Engineers, a member of PEER Business and Industry Partnership (BIP) program, Awarded projects are listed on the PEER-TSRP website at http://peer.berkeley.edu/transportation/projects/. Details of these projects can be found in Chapter 3, where it can be observed that each project provided a major contribution to the PEER mission individually and holistically.
4.6 P
resilienceengineerimost urbevery Bprovidingstock in t
4.7 2
highlightresiliencetools shoon the fo
PEER-USGS
e of new buing impacts,banized and ay Area bug a lens throthe future.
018 PEER
ting the rolee, and the n
ould be develllowing topi
• Earthq
• Perfor
• Perfor
• Engin
S WORKS
OGrHbistH
uildings. Ex, and socioeactive fault
uilding met ough which t
ANNUAL
Th201PENadisrelame
e of PEER need to idenloped for effics:
quake Hazar
rmance-Base
rmance-Base
neering and P
recoConfeatuBusthe e
formfund
HOP: HAY
On January Geological Sresearch neHayWired building codif a Magnitustarting undethis workshHayWired cxperts from economic cot. Among o
current coto view code
MEETING
e 2018 PEE18, at the I
EER at 21: Tatural Hazardciplinary pated natural
eeting openeresearch in
ntify areas wfective decis
rd Characteri
ed Engineeri
ed Engineeri
Public Policy
The firognition of ntest, followured emergiiness and Inevening.
On Fridmatted for mded research
47
YWIRED AN
17, 2018, PSurvey (US
eeds and oScenario’s
de requiremeude 7.0 earter Oakland, hop, particican inform
many discionsequences other producode requireme objectives
ER Annual InternationalThe Practiceds. This yea
performance-l hazards t
ed on Thursn the fields where researsion-making
ization
ing: Applica
ing: Researc
y for Earthqu
st day contwo winnined by the eving research
ndustry Partn
day, Januarymore detailedhers and proj
ND BUILDI
PEER partnSGS) to co-hopportunities
examinationents. The Haythquake hap California, ipants discua research
iplines estim of a large
cts, HayWirements beforand options
Meeting wl House on
e of Performar’s meeting-based engito achieve sday, Januar
of performrch and devg. Plenary se
ations
ch
uake Resilie
ncluded wing teams invening Post
h. An invitatnership (BIP
y 19, concurd discussionjects, with th
NG CODES
nered with thhost a works arising fn of outcoyWired scen
ppens on theon 4/18/18
ussed howagenda for
mated earth-earthquake ed estimatesre the earths for a more
was held onn the UC Bmance-Basedg featured thineering wicommunity
ry 18, with mance-based
elopment ofssions includ
ent Commun
ith the annn the 2017 ter Session &tion-only di
P) program p
rrent breakon and engaghe goal of cr
S
he United Skshop to idefrom the Uomes of cunario asks, “We Hayward
8 at 4:18PMw scenarios
r the earthq-science hazon the couns the outcom
hquake occuresilient bui
n January 18Berkeley camd Engineerinhe role of mith seismic
resiliency. plenary sesengineering
f technologyded presenta
nities
nouncement Blind Predi& Receptionnner for PE
participants e
out sessions gement of PEreating a syn
States entify USGS urrent What Fault
M?” In like
quake zards, ntry’s me if urred, ilding
8–19, mpus: ng for multi-
and The
ssions g and y and ations
and iction n that
EER’s ended
were EER-nergy
of resour
The day Simulatioand final
Bfollowing
Over 24industry PresentatAnnual M
4.8 GP
was dediactivitiesFacilitatireductionsuch as Ufrom 40 c
rces and info
Buildin
Charact
Bridges
Designi
concluded on,” followe remarks fro
Both days g Special Pre
PEER –Berkele
Extremand Poand EnHazards
Learninof InforDimensTsinghu
40 attendeesstakehold
tions and poMeeting web
GADRI MEEPARTICIPA
icated to an s and introduing discussion, including UNISDR, UNcountries. Fo
ormation. Co
ngs
terization of
s
ing for Geoh
with a pleed by reportom Director M
of the Anesentations:
– The First ey
e Events Rssibility of
ngineering Rs Center
ng with Conrmation Geosional Sensua-Berkeley
s at the mders, praosters can b
bsite.
ETING, MAATION
Open Discuucing the mon between universities,NESCO, anor more deta
oncurrent dis
f Geohazards
hazards
enary sessios from the cMosalam.
nnual Meet
Decade –
ReconnaissanCollaborativ
Research – L
nfidence: Thometric Leasory Data Shenzhen In
meeting inclactitioners, be found on
ARCH 2018
ussion Forumembers of thGADRI me
, networks, ad others. Cu
ails, refer to
48
scussion topi
s
n, “Computconcurrent s
ting feature
Jack Moehl
nce: The Prve Social SLori Peek, N
heory and Parning from
– Lin Znstitute
luded reseaand stu
n the 2018
, PEER
PEER partDisaster ReMarch 14–1Research InUniversity, to meetingincluded thBoard. PEEDirectors to
m with the fhe Board ofembers and and organizaurrently, GAhttp://gadri.n
ics included
tational sessions
ed the
le, UC
romise Science Natural
Practice High-
Zhang,
archers, udents. PEER
ticipated inesearch Inst15, 2018, henstitute (DPKyoto, Japa
gs of the Bhe formationER has trano the Advisfollowing agf Directors a
important ations in col
ADRI membenet/.
:
n the Globtitutes (GADeld at the DiPRI) in Uji an. The first Board of Dn of the G
nsitioned frosory Board. genda: (1) Oand Advisorstakeholdersllaboration wership includ
bal AlliancDRI) meetinsaster PreveCampus, Kday was dev
Directors, anGADRI Advom the Boa
The secondOutlining GAry Board; ans in disasterwith UN agedes 150 inst
ce of ng on ention Kyoto voted nd it
visory ard of d day ADRI nd (2) r risk encies itutes
DKhalid MEngineervisiting Alliances
GnetworksSendai Fin GADR
4.9 H
methodomethodotechniquesubstructsimulatioworkshopactivities
Aafternoonapplicatiosimulatiodescriptiotests of hybrid siconduced
MTS Att
Discussing fuMosalam garing for Natuscholar Dr. s for North A
GADRI is a s on topics ramework fo
RI and has be
HYBRID SIM
logy and fulogy, introdues. Furthermturing, integon, and the p continued s.
After the ovn session incons were pon and a largon of the cona variety ofimulation, gd near collap
tendees View PEE
uture directiave a talk ural Hazards
Charles ScAmerica.
collaborativrelated to d
for Disaster Reen on the B
MULATION
undamentals.uction to me
more, presengration meth
implementawith a lunc
verview of cluded quasipresented, cge-scale muntrol room af interestinggeographicalpse.
ER Shaking Tabl
ons and howentitled, PE
ds, where he cawthorn in
ve platform disaster risk Risk Reducti
Board of Dire
N WORKSH
PEERSeriesfocusinsimulaat the great t
static devote
. Presentatioechanical hybntations focuhods, simulaation frame
ch presentati
the methodi-static hybrcovering a ulti-directionand the PEEg quasi-staticlly distribut
le
49
w to proceedEER at 21outlined exa
ntroduced th
for discussireduction a
ion 2015–20ectors since
HOP HOST
, in collabor, held a twong on a ation techno
UC Berkelturnout, with
The first d(slow) hybred to lecturons in this sbrid simulat
used on coreation errorsworks Openon describin
dology and rid simulatio
wide rangenal hybrid simR hybrid simc hybrid simed hybrid s
d in the nex: The Pracamples of fuhe new initi
ion, sharingand resilienc030. PEER hGADRI’s in
TED BY PE
ration with o-day workscomprehenslogies and mley Richmoh active parti
day of the wrid simulatiores that dessession incltion, and dese aspects of and geogrnFresco andng the curren
fundamentaon applicatioe between mulation. Dmulation sysmulation casimulation,
xt few yearsctice of Peruture PEER iative for G
g knowledgece to disastehas been an nauguration
ER AND M
MTS’s Labshop on Marsive exploramethods. Thond Field Sticipation of 4
workshop foon. The mornscribed an luded past ascription of hf the methodraphically dd OpenFrescnt and futur
als in the mons and dem
a small-coDemonstratiostem, and coases, includinand local h
s, PEER Dirrformance-Binitiatives. P
GADRI Reg
e, and promers based oactive particin March 20
MTS
b Expert Semrch 20–21, 2ation of h
he event wastation and h45 attendees
ocused on qning sessionoverview o
and future ohybrid simuldology, includistributed hco Express.
re states of P
morning sesmonstrations. omponent hons started wontinued withng free-vibr
hybrid simul
rector Based PEER gional
moting n the
cipant 015.
minar 2018,
hybrid s held had a s.
quasi-n was f the
of the lation uding
hybrid . The PEER
ssion, Four
hybrid with a h live ration lation
Tsimulatiotheory, dtable conhybrid siof some contributThe aftertuned maapplicatiosystems a
TsimulatiosimulatioMartin LSchellenbShawn Ysimulatiothe broad
Ppresentatreport.
4.10 F
A FrencFebruarypart of thFranciscointernatioand respo
TcommunFrench E
The second on in other indevelopmentnfigurations,mulation. In
of the wotions to hybrrnoon sessioass damper ons in otheand adaptive
The workshoon experts aon. The panLeClerc (Poberg (MaffeYou (MTS)on and waysd engineering
EER and Mtions and dem
FRENCH DE
h delegationy 14, 2018, the delegationo), Mr. Chrisonal team tronse units of
The delegatiities abroad
Embassy alon
day of the ndustries. Prt and applic and seismi
n honor of Prorkshop sperid simulatioon started won the PEE
er domains, e façades, an
p concludedaddressed quel memberslytechnique
ei Structural . Discussed to overcomg community
MTS are planmonstrations
ELEGATIO
n of 14 peo learn aboun included Mstophe Lemoraveled fromf the French
on was keewhen there ng with the
workshop fresentations cations of rec testing syrofessor Stev
eakers and on and to eaith a live de
ER 6-DOF sincluding e
nd fire hybrid
d with a oneuestions from were Dr. SMontreal), Engineering
d aspects wme them, and
y including i
nning on holds are posted
ON VISITS P
eople visitedut PEER actMr. Emmanuoine (French
m Paris and Emergency
en to learn is an earthqFrench Res
50
focused on in the morn
eal-time hybstem modelive Mahin, thattendees th
arthquake enemonstrationshaking tableenergy gened simulation
e-hour Q&Am the audieShawn Gao
Professor Kg), Dr. Shakere the cha
d how to makindustry and
ding similarin the event
PEER
d PEER heivities and guel Lebrun-Dh Consul Gen
included reManagemen
how to bequake. The Hidence, whic
real-time hyning session brid simulating and conhe lunch-timhat reflect
ngineering, an of the reale and contineration from
n.
A session, whence and dis
(MTS), Dr.Khalid Moskhzod Takhiallenges in ke hybrid si
d academia.
r workshops t website and
eadquarters global seismDamiens (Frneral in Los epresentativent Center for
e better preHaitian earthch was the h
ybrid simulaincluded an
tion in actuantrol techniqme presentati
Professor Macademia, anl-time hybridnued with h
m ocean wa
here a panelscussed the . Selim Günsalam (PEEirov (UC Bethe current
imulation ea
in the futurd will be com
in Berkeleymic risk. The
rench ConsuAngeles) an
es from the r French Nat
epared to ahquake in 20home of the
ation and hn overview oator and sha
ques for realion included Mahin’s valund life in gend simulationhybrid simulaves, daylig
l of seven hfuture of h
nay (PEER)R), Dr. Anerkeley), an
state of hasily accessib
re. The workmpiled in a P
y, CaliforniaCalifornia-b
ul General innd their staff
communicationals Abro
assist the Fr010 destroyee ambassado
hybrid of the aking l-time
d talks uable neral. n of a lation
ghting
hybrid hybrid , Mr.
ndreas d Dr.
hybrid ble to
kshop PEER
a, on based n San f. The ations oad.
rench ed the or and
51
diplomatic visitors. Therefore, mitigating the risks for the French population, along with the embassies and consulates, in earthquake-prone areas was of great interest to the delegation.
PEER Director Khalid Mosalam discussed the Center’s activities, details of seismic activity around the world, how risk is evaluated, PEER’s PBEE methodology, and early warning systems. Director Mosalam also emphasized PEER’s ties with the France–Berkeley Fund, as well as the work that was done with sensors as a result of this collaboration. Additionally, Heidi Tremayne, Executive Director of EERI, talked about EERI’s efforts in reducing earthquake risks around the world.
Following the presentations, delegates from the international team asked questions about mitigating seismic risk: where to begin, what to do, and how to do it. Questions also arose about sensors and early warning systems. Mr. Philippe Perez, the Attaché for Science and Technology in San Francisco, enquired about the ways they can actively engage with the earthquake engineering community to stay abreast of latest developments. PEER and EERI recommended participation in the upcoming 11NCEE as a way to start participation. PEER will follow up with Mr. Perez in June 2018 about participation in the conference and other related activities.
4.11 PEER HUB IMAGENET (PHI) CHALLENGE
The Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center (PEER) organized the first image-based structural damage identification competition: the PEER Hub ImageNet (PHI) Challenge to be announced in the mid-summer of 2018.
In this challenge, two sets of images will be provided to the contestants, one for training and the other for testing. The first set consists of about 20,000 labeled images for different categories, examples of which are structural component type, damage level, and damage type. Each competing team is expected to use/develop algorithms to train their recognition models based on these well-labeled images. The second set consists of 5000 unlabeled images to be labeled by the teams using their trained algorithms. Labels predicted for the test set will be compared against reference labels, and teams with the highest accuracy will be declared the winners of the challenge. Reference labels will be provided by a team of structural experts determined by the competition organization committee. Scoring and other rules will be provided during the formal challenge announcement.
This effort is part of PEER’s strategic plan of equipping the earthquake engineering community with tools of the current Digital Revolution Era of Machine Learning, Deep Learning, Artificial Intelligence, and High-Performance Computing. The objective of this challenge is to fully engage the earthquake engineering and other members of the extreme events community at all stages, including preparation of the datasets, execution of the computations, and processing and interpretation of the results. In the datasets preparation stage, members of the community are expected to contribute by uploading images that can be used in the challenge and by labeling these images. To encourage participation to the datasets presentation, PEER hosted a Boot Camp of Machine Learning in Vision-based Structural Health Monitoring,
http://apparound 2
4.12 H
Tconcrete that mornschemes located ytop of conferenat the researchefollowedpartners, with theresearcheto the geanswer se
Tthe socie2018. Thinfrastrucsocial vusystems.
Pcontinue initiativehttps://dofar (Voluhttps://do
Khalid
ps.peer.berke0 students at
HAYWIRED
The event staslab located
ning, anotheof two uni
yards away frthe fault.
ce was held top of Me
ers gave and by a serie
and sponse Lawson Lers providedeneral publicession.
The HayWireetal consequhese issues cture and lifulnerability,
EER looks to engage
. Among thoi.org/10.313ume I: Earthoi.org/10.313
Mosalam
eley.edu/phittended this
D SCENARI
The HayWianticipates tFault, with iand dangerointerconnectperformanceengineering networks an
arted with ad on top of er media touique and m
from the HayIn the afat the Univ
emorial Stan overview es of responsors. The eLecture whed the overviec, followed
ed scenario uences of thinclude imp
feline networeffects on j
forward to athe academ
he documen33/fs201830hquake Haza33/sir201750
ichallenge, bBoot Camp.
IO ROLLO
ired earthquthe impacts its epicenterous in the Uted region. Te-based frais applied t
nd social imp
a media tourthe Haywar
ur was held monumental yward Fault,fternoon, a ersity Club ladium. Hay
of the scnses from levening conere the Hayew of the scby a questi
team is buile M7.0 eart
pacts on inforks, communjobs and the
additional Hmic, researchnts published016 and the Hards and Vo013.
52
between M.
UT: APRIL
uake scenariof a hypoth
r in OaklandU.S. because The scenarioamework: ato determinepacts are exp
r in Fremonrd fault to sh
at UC Berkstructures: t and the Cal
press located yWired cenario, eaders,
ncluded yWired cenario on and
lding on thethquake, and
formation annity recoverye regional e
HayWired reh, and pracd to date, tHayWired E
olume II: En
May 29th an
L 18, 2018
io, led by thetical M7
d. The fault iit runs throu
o methodoloa hazard ie consequenplored.
nt at the Schow the dispkeley, whichthe Hearst lifornia Mem
e engineeringd the resultnd communiy including
economy, an
esults to be rctitioner comthe USGS FEarthquake Sngineering Im
HayWired
nd June 15t
the U.S. Geearthquake
is consideredugh a densegy is very ss postulate
nces to build
ience Centeplacement oh highlightedMemorial M
morial Stadiu
g analyses ts are anticipications techpopulation d
nd earthquak
released in mmunity wiFact Sheet Scenario repmplications)
d Attendees, UnivMemorial Stadiu
th, 2018, w
eological Suon the Hayd the most a
ely urbanizedimilar to PE
ed and defdings, and lif
er that featuof the fault. d seismic reMining Builum, which li
to further expated in Ochnology, risdisplacemenke early wa
October andith the statecan be foun
ports publish) can be fou
versity Club, um
where
urvey, yward active d and
EER’s fined, feline
ured a Later
etrofit lding, ies on
xplore ctober sks to nt and arning
d will ewide nd in
hed so und in
53
4.13 PEER PARTICIPATION AT THE 11NCEE, JUNE, 2018
Many PEER-affiliated researchers participated at the 11th National Conference on Earthquake Engineering held in Los Angeles, California, on June 2 –29, 2018. Over a
dozen faculty, post-docs, and students presented their work on PEER-funded research. Additionally, over 70 PEER-affiliated researchers from PEER core institutions as well as other institutions throughout the world presented and shared posters during the conference.
The PEER exhibit booth was well attended, with scheduled “Meet the Expert” sessions held during the morning and afternoon breaks, as well as impromptu gatherings with researchers and practitioners. Scheduled experts included Dimitrios Lignos, Jack Baker, Jonathan Stewart, I. M. Idriss, Vesna Terzic, Erica Fisher, Barbara Simpson, Tali Feinstein, Hong-Kie Thio, and Selim Günay.
A special session titled, “Steve Mahin Retrospective,” was held Thursday morning, in honor of former PEER Director Mahin. The session was moderated by Jim Malley (Degenkolb Engineers) and Jack Moehle (UC Berkeley, former PEER Director). Speakers included Mahin’s first Ph.D. student as well as his most recent Ph.D. students. Members of the audience were also invited to share their memories of Steve.
Norm Abrahamson, UC Berkeley, delivered Wednesday’s Plenary Session Presentation, “What Changes to Expect in Seismic Hazard Analyses in the Next 5 Years.” Maryann Phipps, Estructure, delivered Thursday’s Plenary Session Presentation, “Seismic Risk: Towards
Performance-Based Construction—Better Buildings by Design,” and mentioned the broad range of analysis results recently illustrated by submittals to the 2017 PEER Blind Prediction Contest. Selim Günay, PEER, presented “Deep Residual Network with Transfer Learning for Image-based Structural Damage Recognition,” and introduced the PEER PHI Challenge that will have more details announced on July 15, 2018.
4.14 P
4.14.1 SA
damage c
T(composicore) of tmany tydelaminaconstrainaddresseddamage temperatu
4.14.2 PL
demonstrlosses frocannot bmulti-damand consformalizefor the loading, hazard cuby the coconsequeof accide
Fabrizio
Nazih M
PEER SEMI
Structural HAeronautic
NaStstrtoorThcoty
classification
The main parite monoliththe thrust re
ypes of damation, crack,nts such as d in this talbefore the ure.
ProbabilistiLoading
Faofisefevpoanev
rated by theom damage. e applied tomage conditsequences. Ined but withoprobabilisticwhich is ba
urve of the somponents sence analysients. The pro
Paolacci
Mechbal
INARS
Health MonNacelles
azih Mechbtructural Heructures withmonitor aut
r civil enginehis process omputationalpically divin, and damag
rts of the nahic) and the verser. Thes
mage, which etc.). Furthchanging
lk was to dedegradation
ic Risk Ass
abrizio Paolaf the urbanizsue becauseffects and covolution of ossible procend in the survents. The e recent 201It is known
o evaluate cotions in multn literature, out convergic risk assesased on Mosite, a multi-eismically ds that includocedure has
nitoring of
al presentedealth Monih an applicatonomously eering struct
relies on l units, andided into foge quantifica
acelle conceinner fixed
se structuresh can reduhermore, thethermal varevelop and
of the who
sessment
acci in this szed territory e of the genonsequences
knowledge edures to prrrounding areeffects of
11 Tohoku that the clas
onsequencestiple equipmseveral attemng toward assment methonte Carlo slevel approa
damaged, anddes propagatbeen implem
54
Composit
d this seminaitoring (SHation to elem
the health oures in real tonboard pla
d communicour steps: dation.
erned with tstructure (IF
s—made fromuce the useese structureriations (frovalidate a Sole structure
of Petroch
seminar on Jagainst Na-T
neral unprepin the aftermon this m
redict damageas, and the earthquakesEarthquake,ssical Quants in case of
ment, and thempts to moda unified apphodology fosimulations. ach is proposd the followtion of multmented in P
te Structur
ar on May 1HM) systemments of aeroof complex time is becoatforms comcation resoudamage dete
the proposedFS, sandwicm compositeful life of es are expoom -55°C tSHM systeme occurs, in
hemical Pla
July 24, 2017Tech events
paredness ofmath of a dis
matter, therege propagatiquantificatio
s on chemi, where mantitative Risk
f earthquakese generationdify the classproach. Thisor petroche
Specificallysed in which
wing levels atiple simultaPRIAMUS s
res: Applic
19, 2017, anms for comonautical nacstructures su
oming increamprising seurces. The ection, dam
d approach ch structure e materials—
a nacelle osed to manto +120°C)
m able to dendependently
ants under
7, discussed, which reprf the countrsaster. Despie is lack inion within a on of the riscal plants ny industria
k Assessments because of
n of multiplesic QRA apps seminar premical planty, starting fh the first levare treated thaneous and isoftware, wh
cation to
nd he focusemplex compcelles. The auch as aeronasingly impoensors, actuaSHM proce
mage localiza
are the fan with honeyc
—are subject(fiber brea
ny environm). The chaletect and locy of the am
r Seismic
d the vulneraresents a straries in prediite the continnformation a
processing sk under Na-is importan
al plants suft (QRA) metf the presen-chains of eproach have esents a newts under sefrom the sevel is represhrough a clasinteracting chich assumes
ed on posite ability nautic ortant. ators,
ess is ation,
cowl comb ted to
akage, mental
lenge calize
mbient
ability ategic icting nuous about plant
-Tech nt, as
ffered thods
nce of events
been w tool ismic
ismic
ented ssical
chains s that
the accidautomatieasily quthe metho
4.15 PD
chairs RoC.B. CroMalley, F
Tseismic dCode (IBcapable ASCE 7,Pacific E2010 in design olessons le
TSacramenparticipanreview oupdated G
dent may bcally genera
uantified. Thod and envis
PEER SEMIDESIGN OF
on Hamburgouse, Greg DFarzad Naeim
These guideldesign of buBC). Properlof reliably , and in som
Earthquake Eresponse to
of tall buildearned in ap
The seminarsnto), Novemnts included
of tall buildGuidelines, a
e representeated sampleshe applicationsages possib
INAR: TBI F TALL BU
PEER partn(SEAOC) WashingtonTall BuildinSeismic Des
Thispublished P2017/06: “Buildings, V
ger and JackDeierlein, Jom, Jonathan
ines presentuildings conly executedachieving o
me aspects wEngineering
the growindings. Newlyplication of
s were held mber 2 (Seatd structural edings. Attendand 4 PDHs
ed by a seqs of damagen of this mele further ev
GUIDELIINILDINGS V
nered with Foundation
n (SEAW) tongs Initiativsign of Tall
s seminar Pacific EarthGuidelines Version 2.0k Moehle, wohn Hooper,Stewart, and
t a recommentained in th, these Guidor exceeding
where specifiResearch Ceg use of alty released Vthe first edit
on October ttle), and Noengineers andees receive.
55
quence of p propagationthod to a pe
volutions.
NES FOR PVERSION 2
the Structurand the
o co-host seve project “Buildings, V
highlighted hquake Engfor Perform
3,” preparedwith contribu, Marshall Ld John Wall
ended alternhe ASCE 7 delines are g the seism
fically noted enter publishternative perVersion 2.0tion on many
24 (San Fraovember 28,nd building ed a copy o
propagation n scenarios,etrochemical
PERFORMA2.03
ral EngineerStructural
eminars to inTBI Guidel
Version 2.03
revisions gineering Remance-Based by a TBI utions from
Lew, Joe Malace.
native to thestandard anintended to
mic performafor Risk Ca
hed a first erformance-b03 addressesy projects.
ancisco with 2017 (Los officials eng
of the prese
“levels.” W the risk of l plant show
ANCE-BAS
rs AssociatiEngineers
ntroduce thelines for Pe3.”
incorporatedesearch (PEd Seismic Working GJack Baker
affei, Stephe
e prescriptivnd the Intern result in bance objectiategories II, edition of thebased approas new know
h webcasts iAngeles). Ogaged in sei
entations, a
With a serief the plant caws the potent
SED SEISM
ion of CalifAssociation
e PEER-manrformance-B
d into the EER) Report
Design of Group led byr, Jonathan Ben Mahin, J
ve procedurenational Buibuildings thaives intende III, and IVese Guidelinaches for sewledge inclu
n San DiegoOver 200 semismic designhardcopy o
es of an be tial of
MIC
fornia n of naged Based
just t No.
Tall y co-Bray,
James
es for ilding at are ed by . The
nes in ismic uding
o and minar n and of the
56
5 T
5.1 O
The Op(OpenSeresponse been devperformato improsource de
Oof systemsoftware or for par
Ogeotechnbeam/colOpenSeeand meth
Aresearchebind the so users users areabout theexplanativariety omodelingstructuraOpenSee
Techno
OPENSEES
en System es) is a softof structura
veloped as tance-based eove modelinevelopment.
OpenSees hams using a is designed
rametric stud
OpenSees pronical modelslumns. Nonles provides ahods for hand
As an open-ers from diffPEER earthand develop
e developerse software aions of the of basic andg and simull and geotec
es Days work
ology T
S
for Earthtware frameal and geotethe computa
earthquake eg and comp
s advanced wide rangefor parallel
dies.
ovides beam. A wide ra
linear analysa large variedling constra
-source framfferent disciphquake enginpers should e so it is imparchitecture,included ma
d advanced elation methochnical enginkshops and v
Tools a
quake Engwork for simechnical sysational platfengineering aputational si
capabilities e of materiacomputing t
m–column elange of uniasis requires aety of nonliaints.
mework, Opplines and dineering comexpect changportant to re access to taterials, elemexamples. Oods that havneering discvia OpenSee
57
and Re
ineering Simulating thestems. Openform for resat PEER. Thimulation in
for modelinal models, eto allow sca
lements andaxial materiaa wide rangenear static a
enSees provifferent part
mmunity togeges and updegister. The the source cments, solutOpenSees fove advancediplines. PEE
es Communit
esourc
imulation e seismic
nSees has search in he goal of thn earthquake
ng and analyelements, an
alable simula
d continuumals and sectie of algorithmand dynamic
vides a coms of the worether. It is udates on a re
OpenSees wcode, the detion algorithosters develod simulationER provides ty message b
ces
he OpenSeee engineerin
yzing the nond solution ations on hig
m elements fion models ms and solutc methods,
mputational rld to work
under continuegular basis. website provevelopment hms, etc., alopment of cn capabilitie
support to uboard.
s developmeng through o
onlinear respalgorithms.
gh-end comp
for structuraare availabl
tion methodsequation sol
environmentogether, heual developmIn this sens
vides informprocess, detong with a community-bes and integusers throug
ent is open-
ponse . The puters
al and le for s, and lvers,
nt for elping ment, se, all
mation tailed large
based grated gh the
New Fun
OpenSeelist of cofew exam
5.2 D
5.2.1 S
This sitereinforce
5.2.2 S
SPO is objective
nctionality t
es continued ontributions mples are ind
Elemento modewith an
Uniaxia
Solvers
DATABASE
Structural P
e (nisee.berked-concrete c
spiral ocross se
rectang
column
Seismic Pe
an applicatie of SPO is t
have a c
have instructur
provideoccurre
provide
unify th
to OpenSee
to grow in can be foun
dicated below
nt Modeling:el shear wal
n elastic elem
alMaterial: C
s: New GPU
ES
Performanc
keley.edu/spdcolumns. Th
or circular hoections)
ular reinforc
ns with or wi
rformance
ion for storo
centralized,
nformation ores
e data obtained since 1900
e pre-earthqu
he post-earth
es
the past yeand at: http://w.
: MVLEM, ls, Compone
ment.
ConcreteD, C
solvers, Cul
ce Databas
d) provides e database d
oop-reinforc
ced columns
ithout splices
e Observato
ring and se
accessible an
of post-earth
ned from ea0 and linked
uake data for
hquake data c
58
ar with man/opensees.be
SFI_MVLEentElement2
ConcreteCM
laS4 and Cu
se
the results describes test
ced columns
s
ory (SPO)
arching pos
nd scalable d
hquake dam
arthquakes ad to structure
r comparison
collection ef
ny additions erkeley.edu/O
M multiple 2D to combin
M, SteelMPF,
ulaS5, Simps
of over 400ts of:
(with circul
st-earthquak
database
mage like vid
at magnitudes
n purposes
fforts
from the coOpenSees/ch
vertical linene zeroLeng
F, and Bilinea
sonsTimeSer
0 cyclic, late
lar, octagon
e damage i
deos, pictur
des of 5.5 a
ommunity. AhangeLog.ph
e element mgth hinges at
arOilDampe
riesIntegrato
eral-load tes
al, or rectan
information.
res, data, etc
and up that
A full hp. A
models t ends
er
or
sts of
ngular
The
c., of
have
SMw7.1 P
5.3 N
informatia large, Online Aof earthqliterature
TNational EarthquaRichmonCaliforni
PO has beenPuebla, Mexi
NISEE / PEE
ion needs ofspecialized
Archive. Resquake, struce, as well as r
The NISEE–Information
ake Engineend Field Statia Institute o
n effectivelyico Earthqua
ER LIBRAR
f the earthquphysical co
earchers woctural, seismresearch soft
–PEER Libran Service forring Researtion and anoof Technolog
y used in the ake.
RY
uake engineeollection of orldwide canmology, geoftware, image
ary originalr Earthquakerch Center (other at the Egy, Pasaden
59
field by sev
ering commulibrary mat
n access this otechnical aes, and video
lly began ine Engineerin(EERC), UnEarthquake
na, Californi
veral reconna
TheService fo(NISEE) /Plibrary of Ustructural engineerinengineerinearthquakeNISEE-PEat the Ribegan its
unity. The Nterials in ad vast databa
and public po recordings
n 1971 as ang (NISEE), niversity of Engineeringa. The phys
aissance team
e Nationaor EarthquaPEER librarUC Berkeley
engineerinng, structung seisme public safeEER Library ichmond Fi mission
NISEE-PEERddition to thase ($25 annpolicy engis.
a public serwith two facCalifornia,
g Research Lsical collecti
ms after the
al Informake Enginery is an affily, specializi
ng, geotechural dynamology, fety. In 1971
opened its dield Stationof serving
R Library hohe NISEE-P
nual memberneering res
rvice projectcilities: one Berkeley, a
Laboratory oion of the li
2017
mation eering liated ing in hnical amics,
and 1, the doors
n and g the ouses PEER rship) earch
t, the at the at the of the ibrary
began wiPenzien,
structuraalso ahttps://ni
Wooearthq
ith the genefollowed by
l and geotecavailable isee.berkeley
odcut showinuakes Jan Ko
erous contriby numerous d
chnical engidigitally.
y.edu/elibrar
ng effects of ozak Collectio
butions of Udonations th
EbudSKMtc
IaSw
neering donMore
ry.
on
60
UC Berkeleyrough the ye
In 2Earthquake becoming thunique to donated bySteinbrugge Kozak, whicMany other the library frcommunity,
ProfeIntroductionavailable thrSEMM, PEEwhich inclune at UC Beinformation
y Professors ears.
008, EERCEngineering
he NISEE–this collecty UC Band Bill Go
ch have beeimage colle
rom studentsand Caltran
essor Vitelmn to Earthqhrough the aER, and UCude seminaerkeley since
can
Ray W. Cl
C merged wg Research
–PEER Librtion are nu
Berkeley Podden, and en digitized ections haves, professorss.
mo Berteroquake Enginarchive, as
C Berkeley al research e 1967. Resbe found
ough and Jo
with the PaCenter (PE
rary. Particuumerous imProfessors Geophysicisby library
been donats, engineers i
o’s tutorialneering, is well as EE
Geotech repin earthq
earch reportd online
oseph
acific EER) ularly mages
Karl st Jan staff.
ted to in the
, An also
ERC, ports,
quake, ts are
at
6 F
6.1 K
K
Com
P
Faciliti
KEY PERSO
Khalid MosalaDirector
Grace Kangmunications D
Selim GünayProject Scientis
es and
ONNEL (HE
am
g irector
y st
d Reso
EADQUAR
AmarnAssociate Dir
Strate
ZuFinancial An
C
FranChief Informa
61
ources
RTERS)
ath Kasalanarector for Operaegic Initiatives
ulema Lara nalyst and Sub
Coordinator
nk McKenna ation Officer/M
ati ations &
baward El
Manager
DarlenAdministra(Retired i
Erika lectronic Comm
Spe
GabrieDatabase
ne Wright ative Director n Jan 2018)
Donald
munications & Wecialist
el Vargas e Specialist
Web
ChristinLibrary
RLabo
6.2 P
Tadahiro KAssistant P Silvia MazVisiting As Sharyl RabVisiting Re Matthew SResearch E
6.3 IN
The InstiCollege orepresentprovide pmission.
na Bodnar-A& Information
Robert Cerneoratory Mechan
PEER STAF
Kishida Project Scientis
zzoni sistant Resear
binovici esearcher
Schoettler Engineer
NSTITUTIO
itutional Boaof Engineerit PEER resepolicy level
Anderson
Services
ey nician
FF RESEAR
st V S
cher CV TV
ONAL BOA
ard membersing or an appearchers at th
guidance an
ClaiTec
LobsLaborat
RCH ENGI
Laurie JohnsoVisiting Project
Sifat SharmeeResearch Engi
Charles ScawVisiting Resea
Tsubasa Tani Visiting Schola
ARD
s, listed in thpropriate Deheir institutind oversight
62
re Johnson chnical Editor
sang Garcia tory Mechanicia
NEERS AN
on t Scientist
en Muin ineer
wthorn rch Engineer
ar
he followingepartment Chion. Generalt for the Cen
an
ND PROJE
NicoAssi MarVisit AndRes
g page, are ahair at the rel duties of tnter with a
AlexLab M
NathanDevelopme
ECT SCIENT
olas Kuehn istant Project S
rtin Nuenschwting Post-docto
dreas Schellenearch Enginee
appointed byespective cothe Institutiogoal to help
x Mead Manager
iel Knight
ent Technician
TISTS
Scientist
wander oral Fellow
nberg er
y the Dean oore institutiononal Board ap PEER fulf
of the n and are to fill its
AnChair
St
University
SUnivers
Oreg
nne Kiremidjr, Institutional tanford Univers
Joel P. Conty of California,
Sashi Kunnatsity of Californi
Michael Scogon State Univ
jian Board
sity
te San Diego
th a, Davis
tt
versity
DomiCalifornia In
RaEduca
Rep
DawUniversi
JohUniversity of C
63
iniki Asimakstitute of Tech
akesh Goel ational Affiliatepresentative
CalPoly
wn Lehman ity of Washingt
hn Wallace California, Los
ki
nology
e
ton
Angeles
Ian Universit
R
Erik AUniversity of S
JackUniversity of C
FarzinUniversity of
Buckle ty of Nevada, Reno
. Johnson
Southern Califo
k Moehle California, Berk
n Zareian f California, Irvi
ornia
keley
ne
6.4 R
The Pacithat has transport(TSRP), systems airports. PEER’s fundamenseismoloearthquakfield invand resea
TPedro ArState UnMosquedaddition,organizat
PUnive
GilUniversity
RESEARCH
ific Earthquacontinuing f
tation systemthe purposeof CalifornFunding froperformanc
ntal knowledgical, geotke and tsunaestigations. archers.
The PEER Trduino (Univniversity), Kda (Universi Amarnath tion of propo
Pedro Arduinersity of Wash
berto Mosquy of California,
H COMMITT
ake Engineefunding fromms. This fune of which
nia, includinom the TSRPce-based eardge, enablintechnical, sami engineeThe progra
TSRP is cooversity of W
Khalid Mosaity of Califo
Kasalanatiosals, assign
no hington
ueda San Diego
TEE
ring Researcm the State nding suppois to lessen
ng highwaysP supports trthquake en
ng technologstructural, hering, and inam also enco
ordinated byWashington),
alam (ex-offfornia, San Di and Selimnment and co
JaStanf
ToEx-Of
64
ch Center (Pof Californi
orts the Tran the impacs and bridgtransportationgineering (gies and systhydrodynamnvolve theorourages vigo
y a ResearchJack Baker
ficio, UniveDiego), andm Günay oompilation o
ack Baker ford University
om Shantz fficio MemberCaltrans
PEER) is a mia related to
ansportation cts of earthqges, port facon-related re(PBEE) metems. The pr
mic and soretical, comporous intera
h Committe(Stanford U
ersity of Cad Tom Shanof PEER hof the review
r
multi-campuo the seismic
Systems Rquakes on thcilities, highesearch that ethodologiesrogram also ocio-economputational, eactions betw
ee (PEER-RUniversity), J
lifornia, Bentz (ex-offichelped the
ws.
JuOregon St
KhalidEx-Offic
University of C
us research cc performan
Research Prohe transporth-speed rail,uses and ex
s, and integaims to inte
mical aspectexperimental
ween practiti
RC) consistinJudy Liu (Orrkeley), Gil
cio, Caltranscommittee
dy Liu tate University
d Mosalam cio Member
California, Berk
center nce of ogram tation , and
xtends grates egrate ts of l, and oners
ng of regon lberto s). In
with
keley
AmaAssigni
PE
6.5 P
As an OCaliforni
6.5.1 E
freedom Berkeleyload framequipmenmicro laBerkeleydigital im
Toperationand IEEEprovidingproject indesign inboth acaagencies,machine suite of o
arnath Kasalng and Comp
Reviews EER/UC Berke
PEER LABO
Organized Ria, Berkeley,
Earthquake
test set-ups y Lab housesme, along nt required t
ab for smally Lab is at thmage process
The PEER–Un and maintaE-693 test pg the enginen a timely mnput, and ovedemic style , refer to thshop and ele
offices are al
anati
pilation of
eley
ORATORIE
Research Un, PEER oper
e Simulator
as well as ms large and with all ofto operate thler-scale exphe forefront ising for the m
UC Berkeleains an IAS aprotocols. Theering commmanner, and erall project reports, alo
he “Service tectronics sholso located a
SeCompila
PEER
ES AT UC B
nit (ORU) urates the follo
r Laborato
The signBerkeleylargest inPEER-UClab consintegratedcomprehehydraulicwith an iavailable
multi-axis cusmall dampef the assoche lab’s variperiments inin the develomeasuremen
y Lab demaccreditationhe PEER–U
munity testinthe academmanagemen
ong with ACto Industry”op, along wi
at the PEER–
65
lim Günay ation of ReviewR/UC Berkeley
BERKELEY
under the Coowing labor
ory
nature piece y Lab is the n the U.S., aC Berkeley sisting of ad, reconfigensive invec actuators, rnventory of to accom
ustom test coer test machiated controious test man self-equiliopment of bont of continu
monstrates ben, related to
UC Berkeleyg facilities,
mic backgrount. The PEERC156 and IE” web page ith dedicated–UC Berkele
ws
Y
ollege of Eratories.
of testing esix degree-oand one of tLab also ho
a 20 ft × 6gurable, mentory of ranging from
f other test hmmodate botonfigurationshines, a 200-ol, measure
achines. The ibrating testoth the hybriuous strain fie
est-practice the shaking
y Lab has a the staffing
und to proviR–UC Berke
EEE-693 repfor more in
d control rooey Lab facili
Engineering
equipment aof-freedom sthe largest inouses a large60 ft strong
modular reaboth static
m 5 kips to hardware andth simple s. In additio-kip and a 4
ement, and PEER facil
ting frames.id simulationelds.
protocol intable testinglong historyexpertise to
de appropriaeley Lab is a
ports submitnformation. oms, confereity.
at Universi
at the PEERshaking tablen the worlde-scale strucg floor witaction wallc and dyn2000 kips, a
d componentsingle-degren, the PEER
4000-kip unidata acquis
lity also hou The PEERn test method
n its generag of both ACy of successo execute a gate data anaavailable to tted to regulA welding
ence rooms,
ity of
R–UC e, the . The ctures th an l. A namic along ts are ee-of-R–UC iaxial sition
uses a R–UC d and
al lab C-156 sfully given
alysis, write
latory shop, and a
Tprivate inutilized ithe reseabasis.
6.5.2 S
In additiresilient bCompetitpartner shaking temergencsubstatioearthquaktesting isseismic effectivenevent of
Tperform t
(i
(i
(i
(i
The PEER-Undustry thatin the develoarch commun
Service-to-I
on to regulbridge bent ution), PEERwith privatable testingcy power gen electrical ke excitatis performed
regulationsness of seisan earthquak
The 6-DOF sthe followin
i) IEEE6these type;
ii) AC15Compduratisubjec
iii) Panel Load Resist
iv) BeamqualifSeism
UC Berkeleyt may requiropment of prnity, and tim
Industry
ar research used in the BR Labs at ate industryg of critical eenerators, ai
equipment ons. The to ensure c
s and to mic retrofit ke.
shaking tableng test protoc
693, Recommrecommenda
56, Seismic Cponents: Thision, and rangcted;
testing per ATest for Sheting Systems
m–Column anfied Connect
mic Applicati
y Labs are re large-caproject budgeme is made
work (e.g., Blind Predic
UC Berkey and perfequipment, eir handlers,
under varyshaking ta
compliance wconfirm
strategies w
e is accreditcols:
mended Pracations includ
Certifications standard esge of frequen
ASTM E212ear Resistancs for Buildin
nd Steel Framtions for Speions.
66
available topacity testingets. Priority available to
the ction eley
form e.g., and
ying able with
the with the goa
ted by Intern
ctice for Seide discussion
n by Shake-tastablishes crncies to whic
26-11, Standce of Verticangs; and
me Testing pecial and Inte
o both the g services. Pin schedulin
o commercia
al of reducin
national Acc
smic Designn of qualific
able Testing riteria for a sch nonstruct
dard Test Meal Elements o
per ANSI/AIermediate St
research coPublished reng a given teal clients on
ng damage a
creditation S
n of Electricacation of each
of Non-struspecific inputural compon
ethods for Cyof the Latera
ISC 341-10, teel Moment
ommunity anecharge rateest always f
n a time-avai
and injury i
Services (IA
al Substationh equipment
uctural ut motion, nents should
yclic (Reveral Force
Chapter K, t Frames for
nd to es are favors ilable
in the
AS) to
ns: t
d be
rsed)
Pre-r
Atesting rfollowing
6.6 F
6.6.1 F
U
NMRAAYJoAMAJa
C
JoDJa
O
SAJu
S
JaS
A select listrecently at g:
W.E. Gun
US Gypsu
The VMC
TRU Com
Manwill E
CW Iron,
IEM (Indu
Tesla Mo
CEL Con
Dynamic
Sonoma C
Tobolski
FACULTY P
Faculty Par
University of
Norm AbrahamM. Reza Alam Richard Allen Abolhassan AsAlexander BayYousef Bozorgonathan Bray
Anil Chopra Mary Comerio Armen Der Kiuames Kelly
California In
ose Andrade Domniki Asimaames Beck
Oregon State
cott Ashford Andre Barbosaudy Liu
Stanford Un
ack Baker arah Billingto
t of companthe PEER
ndy & Assoc
um
C Group
mpliance
Engineering
Inc.
ustrial Electr
tors
sulting
Certification
Cast Stone
Watkins Eng
PARTICIPA
rticipants (
f California
mson
staneh-Asl yen gnia y
ureghian
stitute of Te
aki
e University
a
iversity
on
nies that halaboratories
ciates
LLC
ric Mfg)
ns Lab (DCL
gineering
ANTS
(Core Instit
, Berkeley (
ShaofanStephenJack MoPaulo JKhalid MDoug DFilip FiliSanjay Peggy HRoberto
echnology
John HThomaWilfred
y
Ben MaMichae
GregorKiremid
67
ave performs includes
L)
tutions)
(Headquarte
n Li n Mahin oehle .M. Monteiro
Mosalam reger ppou Govindjee Hellweg o Horowitz
all s Heaton Iwan
ason Michael el Scott
ry Deierlein Adjian
med the
ers)
DMCJMRNKDT
Olson
nne
Dwight Jaffee Mark Wilfried Claudia OsterJuan PestanaMichael RiemRay Seed Nicholas SitarKenichi Soga David SundingTarek Zohdi
Paul Jennin
Harry Yeh Solomon Y
Kincho LawEduardo M
Disconnect S
Mueller
rtag a er
r
g
ngs
im
w iranda
Switch Testing
68
University of California, Davis
Ross Boulanger Rob Y.H. Chai Jason deJong I.M. Idriss
Boris Jeremíc Amit Kanvinde Sashi Kunnath
Bruce Kutter Kenneth Loh Brian Maroney
University of California, Irvine
Anne Lemnitzer Ayman Mosallam
Farzad Naeim Farzin Zareian
University of California, Los Angeles
Scott Brandenberg Robert Kayen
Jonathan Stewart Ertugrul Taciroglu
John Wallace Jian Zhang
University of California, San Diego
Joel Conte Ahmed Elgamal Patrick Fox Tara Hutchinson
J. E. Luco Gilberto Mosqueda José Restrepo
Pui-Shum Shing Chia-Ming Uang Yael Van Den Einde
University of Southern California
Gregg Brandow Roger Ghanem Tom Jordan
Erik Johnson Patrick Lynett Sami Masri
James Moore Costas Synolakis Carter Wellford
University of Washington
Pedro Arduino Jeffrey Berman Paolo Calvi Marc Eberhard Michael Gomez Steve Kramer
Dawn Lehman Laura Lowes Peter Mackenzie Brett Maurer Peter May Mike Motley
Kamran Nemati Dorothy Reed Charles Roeder John Stanton Richard Wiebe
University of Nevada, Reno
Ian Buckle Ahmed Itani Ramin Motamed
Mohamed Moutafa Gokhan Pekcan David Sanders
Keri Ryan Saiid Saidii
69
6.6.2 Faculty Participants (Affiliate Institutions and Outside Organizations)
Boston College John Ebel
Brigham Young University Kyle Rollins
California State University, Chico Curt Haselton
California State University, Long Beach
Lisa Star Vesna Terzic
Florida International University Arindam Chowdhury
Johns Hopkins University Judith Mitrani-Reiser (NIST)
McMaster University Tracy Becker Dimitrios Konstantinidis
Sacramento State University Benjamin Fell
San Diego State University Steven Day
San Jose State University Thalia Anagnos Kurt McMullin
University at Buffalo-SUNY Michael Constantinou Andre Filiatrault Andrew Whittaker
University of California, Santa Barbara Ralph Archuleta Jamison Steidl
University of Central Florida Kevin Mackie Nicos Makris
University of Florida Forrest Masters David Prevatt
University of Hawaii, Manoa Ian Robertson
University of Illinois Youssef Hashash
University of Memphis Chris Cramer Shahram Pezeshk
University of Texas at Austin Gregory Fenves Ellen Rathje Kenneth Stokoe
Virginia Tech University Martin Chapman Adrian Rodriguez-Marek
Western University, Canada Gail Atkinson
70
6.6.3 Industry Partners
AECOM (formerly URS Corporation) Hong Kie Thio
AMEC Foster Wheeler Brian Chiou Marshall Lew Robert Youngs
Bechtel Alidad Hashemi James Marrone Farhang Ostadan
California Dept. of Transportation Mark Mahan Tom Ostrom Tom Schantz Charles Sikorsky
California High-Speed Rail Authority Kevin Thompson
California Seismic Safety Commission Fred Turner
Canterbury Earthquake Recovery Authority (CERA)
Roger Sutton
Forell/Elsesser Engineers Simin Nasseh Mason Walters
Image Cat Bill Graf
Mar Structural Design David Mar
NIST Steve Cauffman Judith Mitrani-Reiser
Pacific Engineering & Analysis Robert Darragh Walt Silva
Rutherford + Chekene Bill Holmes Bret Lizundia
Simpson Gumpertz & Heger Ron Hamburger Gayle S. Johnson Ron Mayes
Skidmore, Owings & Merrill Peter Lee Mark Sarkisian
Tipping Structural Engineers Leo Panian Steve Tipping
U.S. Geological Survey Brad Aaagard Mehmet Celebi Dale Cox
U.S. Resiliency Council Evan Reis
7 I
PEER anformer di
design obuildingsengineeri
PCaliforni(UC), Beworked afaculty aEngineerPEER – t
InCenter (SNational talented mnatural himprove SimCentand Profintend to
Step
n Mem
nd the earthirector of PE
of structural s, bridges, ping.
rofessor Maia. He startederkeley in 1as an Assists Assistant Pring, Mechathe Pacific E
n 2016, he bSimCenter)
Science Fmulti-univer
hazards on thcommunity
er is now ufessor Sanjay carry out St
phen A. Mahin
moriam
hquake enginEER.
ProfessCivil aBerkel
with wcontribmotionstructuand de
steel, reinfpower plant
ahin was bod undergrad1964, earnintant ResearcProfessor in nics, and M
Earthquake E
ecame the foof the Naturoundation. rsity team ofhe built envy resiliencender the co-y Govindjeeteve’s vision
m: Step
neering com
Stephen Asor Emerituand Environmey, passed a
He was a wide-rangingbutions in tn; numericaural testing mevelopment forced concrts, and offsh
orn in Lodi,duate studiesng his BS (ch Engineer
1977. At UMaterials (SEEngineering
ounding Direral Hazards Under his f researchersvironment, we to earthqu-directorshipe (UC Berkenary efforts t
71
phen A.
mmunity lost
A. Mahin, thus of Structumental Engi
away on Febr
world-renowg teaching,the charactel modeling,methods for
of earthqurete, and timhore structu
California, in Civil EnHonors, 196at UC Ber
UC Berkeley,EMM) ProgResearch Ce
ector of the Engineeringvisionary le
s to advancewith the ultiuakes, stormp of Professeley), who ato transform
. Mahin
t a legend th
the Byron Lural Engineineering at truary 10, 20
wned expert, research, erization of, computer severe load
uake-protectmber constr
ures; and pe
and attendngineering at68), MS (19rkeley from , he served a
gram (1990–enter (2009–
Computationg Research Ieadership, te simulation imate aim toms, and ot
sor Greg Deare humbled
research in
n (194
his year, Ste
L. and Elveering in thethe Universi
018.
t in earthquand profe
f earthquakesimulation,
ding environtive systemsruction with
erformance-b
ded school it the Univer970), and P1974–1977
as the Chair–1993), and –2015).
nal ModelinInfrastructurthe SimCenmethods to
o inform decther extrem
eierlein (Stand by their ne
natural haza
6–2018
ephen A. M
vira E. Nishe Departmeity of Califo
uake engineeessional prae strong gr, and innovnments; inces; behaviorh applicationbased earthq
n Pacific Gsity of Calif
Ph.D. (1974), then joine
r of the Strucwas Direct
ng and Simulre, funded b
nter assemblreduce effeccision makin
me hazards. nford Univeew role, andards enginee
8)
Mahin,
hkian ent of ornia,
ering, actice round vative eption r and ns in quake
Grove, fornia ). He d the ctural tor of
lation by the led a cts of ng to
The ersity) d who ring.
72
Dr. Mahin’s research focused on improving the understanding of seismic behavior of systems by integrating high-performance numerical and experimental simulation methods. He pioneered the development of hybrid simulation theories and methods that integrated large-scale physical tests with computer simulations, thereby enabling study of complete structural systems under realistic loading.
He recognized the value of seismic isolation and protective systems, and conceived and developed these technologies with the goal of reducing costs and enhancing seismic performance. He was active in adapting supplemental viscous damping, added mass damping, and seismic isolation systems to the needs of actual building projects.
Professor Mahin published hundreds of journal articles, papers, and reports, and the range of topics reflects the comprehensive and broad expanse of his research engagement.
In 1983 he was awarded the ASCE Walter Huber Civil Engineering Research Prize for his practical application of rigorous theory to complex engineering problems. In 1987 he was awarded the Norman Medal by ASCE for his seminal work on the seismic behavior of offshore platforms, and in 2012 he was inducted into the ASCE/OTC Hall of Fame. His pioneering work on self-centering bridges earned him the FHWA James Cooper Best Paper Award in 2007.
The American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC) honored him with its Special Educator Achievement Award in 2001 for leadership in improving steel structures subjected to earthquakes, and its Lifetime Achievement Award in 2013 for sustained contributions to the profession, industry, and academia. He was recognized for innovative research related to the seismic behavior of conventional and buckling restrained braced frames as well as moment-
frame structures. He served as program manager for the six-year FEMA-sponsored SAC Steel Project that developed guidelines for the design of steel moment-frame structures following the 1994 Northridge earthquake. The SAC guidelines and supporting documents led directly to major changes to the AISC seismic design standards that are used in the United States and worldwide, and that will greatly improve the performance of steel buildings in future earthquakes.
Dr. Mahin served as President of CUREe (1994–1997), Vice-President of the Association for Steel-Concrete Composite Structures (1997–2000), and recently served as Vice President of the International Association for Experimental Structural Engineering. He served as a Director of the Structural Engineers Association of Northern California (SEAONC), and was awarded SEAONC’s Helmut Krawinkler Award (2017) for
73
outstanding leadership in implementing state-of-the-art research into structural engineering practice. The Northern California Chapter of the Earthquake Engineering Research Institute (EERI) recognized Steve as its 2017 Individual Awardee for Leadership, Innovation, and Outstanding Accomplishments in Earthquake Risk Reduction for decades of visionary work in engineering research and teaching.
Dr. Mahin chaired the NEHRP Northridge Earthquake Engineering Research Coordination Program (1995–1997). He worked tirelessly on behalf of the US–Japan cooperative programs, opening the door for US participation in landmark experiments at Japan’s E-Defense facility, resulting in the NEES/E-Defense collaboration. He chaired the NSF US–Japan Cooperative Earthquake Research Program on Composite and Hybrid Structures (1995–1999), and NEES/E-Defense Collaborative Research Program since 2004.
He had a deep interest and unique talent to interact and make friends with fellow researchers throughout the world. Many international research collaborations with Asia, including China, Japan, Korea, Singapore, and Taiwan, among others, were initiated and nurtured by his leadership. Over three decades he enlightened, guided, and led multiple phases of US–Japan research collaboration on earthquake engineering using large-scale test facilities operated by the two countries.
Dr. Mahin was named a Master Academician (2014) by Tongji University of Shanghai, China. The title is given to the top 100 professors internationally in all fields of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC). He was Director of ILEE–International Joint Research Laboratory of Earthquake Engineering, located at Tongji University.
Dr. Mahin was invited to give keynote addresses at several national and international conferences. Notable among his recent addresses was the opening keynote lecture at 16WCEE in Santiago, Chile (January 2017), on “Resilience by Design: A Structural Engineering Perspective.” The lecture reflected his unique perspective, which included disciplines beyond structural engineering.
He delivered the opening keynote lecture at the Structural Engineering Frontiers Conference (SEFC17) at the Tokyo Institute of Technology on March 2017, on recent advances in the use of computer-enabled optimization to enhance the seismic performance of existing tall buildings using fluid viscous dampers. The conference brought together more than 200 academic and professional engineering experts from Japan and abroad to discuss emerging trends in structural engineering.
Professor Mahin gave a keynote address at National Center for Research in Earthquake Engineering (NCREE) in Taiwan (August 2017), at the opening of their new earthquake simulation laboratory. Mahin discussed lessons from recent disastrous earthquakes, and their implications for research over the next several decades. He also highlighted recent work by his research group on hybrid simulation using large scale test machines and shaking tables, like those in the new NCREE laboratory.
74
Steve Mahin’s life includes many achievements, and the list would not be complete without mentioning his sons, Jeff and Colin, two fine men prominent in Steve’s life and heart, and of whom he was very proud.
Professor Mahin was an engaging mentor of numerous students over his long career. His students recall that he taught them to see problems with ten solutions instead of one solution, to always think outside of the box, and to never shrink from sharing new and thought-provoking ideas. A meeting or casual encounter with Professor Mahin could generate ideas leading to decades of research. National and international travel to engage the broad earthquake community were a regular part of graduate student training with Professor Mahin.
During his nearly 50-year career at Berkeley and with international activities, Professor Mahin taught, advised, and mentored generations of students, postdoctoral fellows, research associates and colleagues, and practicing engineers. His broad range of interests also engaged social scientists and stakeholders. His creative approach, collaborative spirit, and enthusiastic generosity in sharing his prolific ideas have inspired everyone who has spent time with him, and he will leave his mark on the profession for years to come.
75
Appendix A List of Sub-Award Projects (Prior 5 Years)
76
77
Fund Source
PI Institution Project Title
TSRP Jose Andrade Cal Tech Micro-Inspired Continuum Modeling Using Virtual Experiments
TSRP Brett Maurer University of Washington
Towards Multi-Tier Modeling of Liquefaction Impacts on Transportation Infrastructure
TSRP Pedro Arduino University of Washington
Implementation and Validation of PM4Sand in OpenSees
TSRP Keri Ryan University of Nevada, Reno
Influence of Vertical Ground Shaking on Design of Bridges Isolated with Friction Pendulum Bearings
TSRP Minjie Zhu Oregon State University
Fluid–Structure Interaction and Python Scripting Capabilities in OpenSees
TSRP Kenichi Soga UC Berkeley High-Performance Computing-Based Distributed Multi-Layered City-Scale Transportation Network Tool
TSRP Jack Baker Stanford Modeling Bay Area Transportation Network Resilience
TSRP Henry Burton UCLA Aftershock Seismic Vulnerability and Time-Dependent Risk Assessment of Bridges
TSRP Ahmed Elgamal UCSD A Systematic Computational Framework for Multi-Span Bridge PBEE Applications
TSRP Erica Fischer OSU Post-Earthquake Fire Performance of Industrial Facilities
TSRP Patrick Lynett USC Tsunami Debris: Simulating Hazard and Loads
TSRP Amit Kanvinde UCD Dissipative Base Connections for Moment Frame Structures in Airports and Other Transportation Systems
TSRP Gregory Deierlein Stanford UNR-Stanford Collaboration: Stanford - Accounting for Earthquake Duration in Performance-Based Evaluation and Design of Bridges
TSRP David Sanders UNR Project Title: UNR-Stanford Collaboration: UNR - Accounting for Earthquake Duration in Performance-Based Evaluation and Design of Bridges
78
Fund Source
PI Institution Project Title
TSRP Anne Lemnitzer UCI Towards Next Generation P-Y Formulations - Part 2: Statistical Assessment of Uncertainties in Key Components of Soil Resistance Functions
TSRP Ertugrul Taciroglu UCLA Development of a Database and a Toolbox for Regional Seismic Risk Assessment of California’s Highway Bridges
TSRP Jonathan Bray UCB Liquefaction Triggering and Effects at Silty Soil Sites
TSRP Steven L. Kramer UW Next Generation Liquefaction: Japan Data Collection
TSRP Jonathan P. Stewart
UCLA Next Generation Liquefaction: Japan Data Collection (Task #3k01-Tsrp, Year 2)
TSRP Jose I. Restrepo UCSD Earthquake Resilient Bridge Columns
TSRP Patrick Lynett USC Tsunami Design Guide Specifications for Bridges: Local Tsunami Hazard Assessment
TSRP Harry Yeh Oregon State University
Tsunami Engineering: Performance Based Tsunami Engineering
TSRP Hong Kie Thio AECOM Tsunami Engineering: Performance Based Tsunami Engineering
TSRP Anne Lemnitzer UCI Towards Next Generation P-Y Curves - Part 1: Evaluation of the State of the Art and Identification of Recent Research Developments
TSRP Vesna Terzic CSU Long Beach
Recovery Model for Commercial Low-Rise Buildings
TSRP Armen Der Kiureghian
American University of Armenia
Stochastic Modeling and Simulation of Near-Fault Ground Motions for Use in PBEE
TSRP Kamran M. Nemati UW How Water/Biner Ratio and Voids Affect The Performance of Hardened Concrete Subjected to Fire
TSRP Sanjay Govindjee UCB Geometrically Exact Nonlinear Modeling of Multi-Storage Friction
TSRP Tarek I. Zohdi UCB Swarm-Enabled Infrastructure-Mapping for Rapid Damage Assessment following Earthquakes
79
Fund Source
PI Institution Project Title
TSRP Claudia Ostertag UCB Conventional Testing and Hybrid Simulations of Environmentally Damaged Bridge Columns
TSRP Steve Mahin UCB 3 Axis Testing of Four PEER Columns (Six Weeks Maximum Shaking Table Occupation and Testing Time)
TSRP Steve Mahin UCB Bridge Column Testing
TSRP Jonathan D. Bray UCB Liquefaction-Induced SFSI Damage Due To the 2010 Chile Earthquake
TSRP Gregory Deierlein Stanford University
Effects of Long-Duration Ground Motions on Structural Performance
TSRP Jose L. Restrepo UCSD Advanced Precast Concrete Dual-Shell Steel Columns
TSRP Joel P. Conte UCSD Probabilistic Performance-Based Optimal Seismic Design of Isolated Bridge Structures
TSRP Claudia P. Ostertag UCB Shaking Table Test of Pre-Cast Post-Tensioned Hyfrc Bridge Column
TSRP Kyle Rollins Brigham Young University
Supplemental Field Testing of Pile Down Drag Due to Liquefaction
TSRP Steven L. Kramer UW Next Generation Liquefaction: Japan Data Collection
TSRP (Tsunami)
Hong Kie Thio URS Corporation
Performance Based Tsunami Engineering Methodology (Tsunami Research Program)
TSRP (Tsunami)
Patrick Lynett USC Simulation Confidence in Tsunami-Driven Overland Flow (Tsunami Research Program)
TSRP (Tsunami)
Harry Yeh Oregon State University
Performance Based Tsunami Engineering Methodology (Tsunami Research Program)
TSRP John W. Wallace UCLA Shear-Flexure Interaction Modeling for Reinforced Concrete Structural Walls and Columns Under Cycling Loading
TSRP Jack Baker Stanford University
Ground Motions and Selection Tools for PEER Research Program
TSRP Jonathan P. Stewart
UCLA Next Generation Liquefaction: Japan Data Collection (Task #3K01-TSRP, Year 2)
TSRP & Validus
Vesna Terzic CSU Long Beach
Towards Resilient Structures
80
Fund Source
PI Institution Project Title
TSRP Scott J. Brandenberg
UCLA Influence of Kinematic SSI on Foundation Input Motions for Bridges on Deep Foundations
TSRP Ross W. Boulanger UC Davis Mitigation of Ground Deformations in Soft Ground
TSRP Jose I Restrepo UCSD Earthquake Resilient Bridge Columns
TSRP Jonathan D. Bray UC Berkeley Next Generation Liquefaction: New Zealand Data Collection
Lifelines Jonathan P. Stewart
UCLA NGL: Next Generation Liquefaction Database Development and Implications for Engineering Models
Lifelines Steven L Kramer UW NGL: Next Generation Liquefaction Database Development and Liquefaction Triggering Evaluation
Lifelines Filip C. Filippou UCB PEER-Lifelines Proposal - Non Convergence
Lifelines Sashi Kunnath UCD Caltrans-PEER Workshop on Characterizing Uncertainty in Bridge-Component Capacity Limit-States
NC1T01 Steven Day UCSD Vertical-Component Basin Amplification Model
NC2Q03 Jason DeJong UCD In-Situ Identification and Characterization of Intermediate Soils
NC2S01 Jonathan P. Stewart
UCLA In-Situ Identification and Characterization of Intermediate Soils
NC2L01 Robert Bachman Cosmos Archiving and Web Dissemination of Geotechnical Data, Phase 4a: Production GVDC Using DIGGS Standard
NC1E09 Robert Darragh Pacific Engineering and Analysis
NGA Processing Update 2
NC10A2 Hong Kie Thio URS Corporation
Tsunami Hazard Analysis Phase2
NC9K02 Farzin Zareian UCI Quantification of Variability in Performance Measures of Ordinary Bridges to Uncertainty in Seismic Loading Directionality and Its Implication in Engineering Practice
81
Fund Source
PI Institution Project Title
NC10B1 Michael H. Scott Oregon State University
Validation of OpenSees for Tsunami Effects on Bridge Superstructures
NC9M01 Pedro Arduino UW Estimation of Shear Demands on Rock-Socketed Drilled Shafts subjected to Lateral Loading
NC4E01 Scott J. Brandenberg
UCLA Evaluation of Collapse and Non-Collapse of Parallel Bridges Affected by Liquefaction and Lateral Spreading
NC3J01 Steve Kramer UW Effects of Liquefaction on Surface Response Spectra
NC2U01 Jonathan P. Stewart
UCLA Guidelines for Performing Hazard-Consistent 1-D Ground Response Analysis for Ground Motion Prediction
NCBC01 Armen Der Kiureghian
UCB Synthetic Near-Fault Ground Motion Arrays for PBEE Analysis
NC9N01 Marios Panagiotou UCB Three Dimensional Seismic Demand Model for Bridge Piers Supported on Rocking Shallow Foundations
NC3KL1 Jonathan P. Stewart
UCLA Next Generation Liquefaction: Japan Data Collection
NC2T01 Scott J. Brandenberg
UCLA Influence of Kinematic SSI on Foundation Input Motions for Bridges on Deep Foundations
DOE Robert R. Youngs AMEC Environment & Infrastructure
NGA-East: SSHAC and TI Seismic Research Review
NRC Walter J. Silva Pacific Engineering and Analysis
NGA-East: GMPE Implementation
NRC Robert R. Youngs AMEC Environment & Infrastructure
NGA-East: SSHAC and TI Seismic Research Review
DOE Walter J. Silva Pacific Engineering and Analysis
Development of Vertical Amplification Factors
82
Fund Source
PI Institution Project Title
DOE Robert R. Youngs AMEC Environment & Infrastructure
NGA-East: SSHAC, PPRP and TRC Seismic Research Review
NRC Martin Chapman Virginia Tech
NGA-East Path/Source Working Group Tasks
DOE Martin Chapman Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
NGA-East Path Working Group Tasks
NRC (24669)
Thomas Jordan USC Support of the SCEC Broadband Platform for NGA-East Simulations
DOE Youssef Hashash University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Geotechnical Working Group Integration Project
CEA Paul Somerville URS Corporation
Directivity Corrections for NGA-West GMPE's
CEA Mark Petersen USGS PEER-USGS Collaboration on NGA-WEST 2
CEA Stanford Stanford Directionality Model for NGA West 2
CEA Jonathan P. Stewart
UCLA Further Development of Site Responses in NGA Models
CEA Paul Spudich USGS Update of the Spudich and Chiou 2008 Directivity Model for Improved Prediction and Directivity and Directionality
CEA Robert R. Youngs AMEC Geomatrix
GMPE Development and Assessment of Epistemic Uncertainty
CEA Walter J. Silva Pacific Engineering and Analysis
Update NGA-W Strong Motion Database and Develop Vertical Amplification Factors
FM Global
Walter J. Silva Pacific Engineering and Analysis
NGA-Subduction Strong Ground Motion
USDI Jonathan Stewart UCLA NGA-Subduction Analysis of Maule Chile and Tohoku Japan Ground Motion Data
83
Fund Source
PI Institution Project Title
TSRP Steven L. Kramer UW Next Generation Liquefaction: Japan Data Collection
TSRP Jonathan P. Stewart
UCLA Next Generation Liquefaction: Japan Data Collection (Task #3K01-TSRP, Year 2)
The Pacifi c Earthquake Engineering Research Center (PEER) is a multi-institutional research and education center with headquarters at the University of California, Berkeley. Investigators from over 20 universities, several consulting companies, and researchers at various state and federal government agencies contribute to research programs focused on performance-based earthquake engineering.
These research programs aim to identify and reduce the risks from major earthquakes to life safety and to the economy by including research in a wide variety of disciplines including structural and geotechnical engineering, geology/seismology, lifelines, transportation, architecture, economics, risk management, and public policy.
PEER is supported by federal, state, local, and regional agencies, together with industry partners.
PEER Core Institutions:University of California, Berkeley (Lead Institution)
California Institute of TechnologyOregon State University
Stanford UniversityUniversity of California, DavisUniversity of California, Irvine
University of California, Los AngelesUniversity of California, San DiegoUniversity of Southern California
University of Washington
PEER reports can be ordered at http://peer.berkeley.edu/publications/peer_reports.html or by contacting
Pacifi c Earthquake Engineering Research CenterUniversity of California, Berkeley325 Davis Hall, Mail Code 1792
Berkeley, CA 94720-1792Tel: 510-642-3437Fax: 510-642-1655
Email: [email protected]
ISSN 1547-0587X