p1(case study)

Upload: blacktiger7

Post on 08-Apr-2018

223 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/7/2019 P1(case study)

    1/20

  • 8/7/2019 P1(case study)

    2/20

  • 8/7/2019 P1(case study)

    3/20

  • 8/7/2019 P1(case study)

    4/20

  • 8/7/2019 P1(case study)

    5/20

    News taken from The Star Online

    An accident involving the use of gondola 29 March 2008 (Saturday) and at about

    10.00 am

    In a high-rise building construction project somewhere inBukit Mulia, Ampang.

    3 workers seriously injured after thrown off from level 13.

  • 8/7/2019 P1(case study)

    6/20

    The gondola

  • 8/7/2019 P1(case study)

    7/20

    LOSS

    PEOPLE

    INJURED 3 WORKERS PROPERTY

    MACHINE BREAKDOWN - GONDOLA

    PROCESS

    CONSTRUCTION PROCESS STOP FOR A WHILEABOUT 2 HOURS

  • 8/7/2019 P1(case study)

    8/20

    INCIDENT

    Three workers on the gondola thrown off and landed on theground.

    IMMEDIATE CAUSE

    The workers placed the concrete mixture about 300kg and plus 3workers weight about 200kg which is approximately 500kg;exceeding the safe working load of the gondola.

    One of the suspension ropes which had slipped from its mounting

    on the 15th floor of the building was found to be lying at thebottom of the gondola causing the working platform of thegondola to tilt and suspend from the other end.

  • 8/7/2019 P1(case study)

    9/20

    BASIC CAUSES

    Personnel factors Lack of ability that tend to that accident Low mentality

    No safety procedure on how to handle the gondola

    Job factors Bad maintenance

    low-quality equipment

    Tough works times

    the workers want to make the work faster so they put the concrete mixtureexceeding the safe load.

  • 8/7/2019 P1(case study)

    10/20

  • 8/7/2019 P1(case study)

    11/20

    It is opposite of Accident CausationModel

    Its starting from Lack of control thenBasic Causes, Immediate Causes,

    Incident and finally loss

    So from that we can know source of theaccident

  • 8/7/2019 P1(case study)

    12/20

    LACK

    OFCONTROL

    BAS

    IC

    CAUSES

    IMMED

    IATEC

    AUSES

    IN

    CIDE

    NT

    LOSS

  • 8/7/2019 P1(case study)

    13/20

    L

    ACKOFCONTR

    OL

    BASICCAUSE

    S

    IM

    MED

    IATECAU

    SES

    INCIDE

    NT

    LOSS

  • 8/7/2019 P1(case study)

    14/20

    LACKOFCONTRO

    L

    BASICCAUSE

    S

    IM

    MEDIATECAU

    SES

    INCIDENT

    LOSS

  • 8/7/2019 P1(case study)

    15/20

    LACK

    OFCONTR

    OL

    BASICCAUSES

    IMMEDIATECAU

    SES

    INCIDENT

    LOSS

  • 8/7/2019 P1(case study)

    16/20

    LACK

    OFCO

    NTROL

    BASICCA

    USES

    IMMED

    IATE

    CAU

    SES

    INCIDENT

    LOSS

  • 8/7/2019 P1(case study)

    17/20

    LACK

    OFCO

    NTRO

    L

    BASICCA

    USES

    IMMEDIATECAU

    SES

    INCIDE

    NT

    LOSS

  • 8/7/2019 P1(case study)

    18/20

    The safe working load capacity plate has to beprominently displayed on the gondola.

    From FMA, factory and machinery (personal incharge) regulation have mention about the regulation

    for personal in charge.

    Any person who owns or hires a gondola (which isdefined as a hoisting machine) has to ensure that aCertificate of Fitness is obtained from the

    department before the machine is used. Refer toFMA the factory and machinery (certificates ofcompetency examinations) regulation 1970

  • 8/7/2019 P1(case study)

    19/20

    The employer has to ensure that the gondola is notoverloaded during operation. Only 2 workers areallowed on the working platform.

    Maintaining equipment used from time to time check the condition of the gondola. Inspectionfollow Safety and Health rules.

    Supervisor has big responsibility in motivatingworkers and supervision need to be done from timeto time

    Add weight sensor to make sure not overload.

  • 8/7/2019 P1(case study)

    20/20