p09457 process improvement project project review eric maccormack – chief engineer (ie) colin roy...

36
P09457 Process Improvement Project Project Review Eric MacCormack – Chief Engineer (IE) Colin Roy – Project Manager (IE) Duke Bonaventura – Engineer (IE) Jimmy Ichihana – Engineer (IE) Cody Rath – Engineer (ME)

Upload: bridget-mcbride

Post on 26-Dec-2015

220 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

P09457 Process Improvement ProjectProject Review

Eric MacCormack – Chief Engineer (IE)Colin Roy – Project Manager (IE)

Duke Bonaventura – Engineer (IE)Jimmy Ichihana – Engineer (IE)

Cody Rath – Engineer (ME)

AgendaAgenda

Engineering Specifications

Concept Summary

Design Updates

Plant Layout

Weld Booth Layout

Hydrostatic Testing Table

Kaizen Results

Weld Stick Order Procedure

Consignment Inventory Reduction

Case Hydrostatic Testing Area Design

Consignment Checkout Suggestions

MSD II Quarter Progress

Objective Project Evaluation2

Engineering SpecificationsEngineering SpecificationsEngr. Spec.

#

Importance

Source Specification (description) Unit of MeasureMarginal Value

Ideal Value

ResultsComments/

Status

ES1 1 CN1 Recordable Injury Injuries / yr  0 0 Should be 

ES2 1 CN1 Near Miss InjuryNear Miss Injuries /

yr 0 0 Should be 

ES3 1 CN2Increased floor space for new opportunity

sq ft 10% 30% 23%  

ES4 1 CN3 Finished products out the door Parts / yr 5% 15%Capacity

increased 33%  ES5 2 CN4 Standard welding stations Specs Same Y Y Y Yes/No

ES6 2 CN5 Total distance materials travel ft -15% -40% -34%  

ES7 3 CN6 Consignment part availability Percent Available  90%  100%

ES8 3 CN6Trigger response to recognize what seeing

Response Time  <5s  <1s

ES9 3 CN7 Inventory turnover Time 30 Days   16 Days Minimize

Importance: 1=must have, 2=nice to have, 3=preference only        

Marginal Value: Minimal improvement value        

Ideal Value: Best case scenario given constraints        

3

Design SummaryDesign Summary

Improve safety and increase plant capacity by

relocating weld booths off of the Final Packaging floor

Standardize weld booths for increased productivity

Redesign the Hydrostatic Testing area to ensure

worker safety

Reduce Consignment inventory

Develop standard work for the weld stick ordering

procedure

4

Design Status UpdatesDesign Status Updates

5

6

Plant Layout Status Update Most equipment and material has been ordered;

remaining are in quote processes

Changes have been made resulting from floor

personnel input

Planned completion date end of third quarter 2009

Maintenance department has started required

departmental improvements

Electrical Drops

Final Plant LayoutFinal Plant Layout

7

8

Weld Booth Layout Status Update

No longer need to dig

trenches as work benches

have been reoriented

Rollers have been received

Weld curtain framework has

been received

Welders have chosen

personal booths

9

Hydrostatic Table Status Update Waiting on second quote for safety cage

6S executed on flange inventory

Gauge board components have been quoted

Gauge board placed on order from weld shop

Kaizen 1 -Weld Stick Order Procedure

10

11

Needs Inventory for weld stick rods should never be zero

Reordering process

Information flow

12

Current State

13

Future State

14

Storage Location Example

15

Storage Rack 3D

16

Benefits Quick, visual way to identify what needs to be ordered

Responsibility falls in one individual’s hands

With correct buffer and safety stocks, weld sticks will

never run out

Reduced number of weld sticks on hand

Eliminate need for expedited orders

Less time and resources needed to maintain the

system

Kaizen 2- Reduction of Consignment Inventory

17

18

Needs Reduce consignment footprint to make use of the

space in alternative ways

Determine part usage

Eliminate parts and empty shelves

19

Usage Data Last 18 Months

83 different parts770 units of parts

20

Results

Current Target Day 1 Final % Improvement

Space (sq. ft.) 1041 781  777   25 

Inventory of different parts 337 252 252   25

Visual controls 0 1 0   0

Consignment Checkout

21

22

Consignment Checkout Current State Process

23

Costs

Item Total

Wireless Barcode Scanner $500 - $1500

Total $500 - $1500

Barriers

Barrier Contingency

Additional software might be needed Develop or purchase software necessary

Workers may still not check out partsControlled gate access or stricter

policies

Positives

Automated ordering

No need to manually input information

Information sent directly to supplier and Wendy

Shorter lead time (Real-time update)

Less time and effort to check out

Better part availability

Robust technology

Easy implementation

Negatives

Repair/Maintenance of infrastructure

Training

Database Manager

Product Process: Barcode Scanner Location: Consignment

Owner: RIT Team Date: April 2009

Process Flow

24

Costs

Item Total

Scratch-Off Lottery Ticket $1/Day

Total $260/Year

Risks

Risk Contingency

Workers will want lottery tickets for other process

they are expected/paid to do

Workers will be verbally positively reinforced by

management when they are seen following

procedures.

Workers will fill out multiple cards when only one

needs to be

If it is determined that this is occurring, the person(s)

will not be allowed to win for X days/weeks.

Only pipe fitters will be receiving lottery ticketsPut reward on other systems to benefit welders, test,

etc.

Performance Management Process

Product Process: Consignment Check Out Location: Piping and Packaging

Owner: Dave Thompson & RIT Team Date: April 2009

Positives

Improves conformity of workers to the consignment check out process. Yellow cards filled out more frequently/correctly will improve:

Visibility of inventory Assurance that customer’s parts are going to the proper skids

Workers will gain a feeling that their work is being noticed and appreciated. It is a low cost solution to help combat a high cost problem.

Negatives

Not 100% accurate Consignment data must be recorded twice Slow process

25

Product Process: Consignment Checkout Location: Piping and Packaging

Owner: Dave Thompson and RIT team Date: April 2009

Material Handler Process

1. Walk loop and collect consignment orders at the same time, delivers consignment parts to workers, and deliver parts between welders and pipe fitters

2. Tracks consignment levels as parts leave the consignment area

Costs

Item Total

1 Worker’s Salary $15 / hour

Kanban Post $1000

Total

Barriers

Barrier Contingency

Potentially a bottleneckConduct up front study to evaluate

conveyance time

Positives

Helps prevent missing parts by having a single worker responsible for checking out

parts

Eliminates welder and pipe fitter downtime associated with travel

Real time data tracking eliminates the lag between running out of parts and placing

the order for more

Creates a proactive approach to ordering necessary parts

Negatives

Additional personnel

Additional information flow (request for parts made)

26

Case Hydrostatic Testing Area DesignCase Hydrostatic Testing Area Design

27

Case Hydro – System Needs Primary Needs

Incorporate HAZOP recommendations to improve safety

Improve control layout

Improve Standard Operating Procedure Documentation

Analysis:

Reviewed the current procedural documentation and made

suggestions about possible improvements

Developed several concepts that implement safety components into

two mechanical systems involved in case testing: Hydro and Air

Compared and weighted the concepts to determine an ideal design

for the given application

28

Hydro System Concepts

Pressure VesselNew or Existing Gauge Board

Calibrated Low Pressure

Gauge

Low Pressure Pump

Low PressureControl Valve

Main Water Feed

Drain

Drain Valve

Pressurized Feed

Calibrated High Pressure

Gauge

High Pressure Pump

High PressureControl Valve

Pressure VesselNew or Existing Gauge Board

Low Pressure Pump

Low PressureControl Valve

Main Water Feed

Drain

Drain Valve

Pressurized Feed

High Pressure Pump

High PressureControl Valve

Rupture Disc

Digital PressureGauge

Pressure Limit Switch

Concept #1

Concept #3

Concept #2

Pressure VesselNew or Existing Gauge Board

Low Pressure Pump

Low PressureControl Valve

Main Water Feed

Drain

Drain Valve

Pressurized Feed

High Pressure Pump

High PressureControl Valve

Digital PressureGauge

Pressure Limit Switch

29

Air System Concepts

Pressure Vessel

Main Air Supply

Air Pressure Regulator

Air Relief Valve

Concept #1 Concept #2

Pressure Vessel

Main Air Supply

Air Pressure Regulator

Air Relief Valve

Calibrated PressureGauge

Main Control Valve

30

Concept Assessment To compare the different concepts, a Pugh assessment was completed Hydro Concept #1 proved to be the ideal solution for the hydro system Air Concept #2 proved to be the ideal solution for the air system

Hydro Pugh Assessment Air Pugh Assessment

31

Final Design – Hydro System

Pressure Vessel

Calibrated Low Pressure

Gauge

Low Pressure Pump

Low PressureControl Valve

Main Water Feed

Drain

Drain Valve

Pressurized Feed

Calibrated High Pressure

Gauge

High Pressure Pump

High PressureControl Valve

Rupture Disc

32

Final Design – Air System

Pressure Vessel

Main Air Supply

Air Pressure Regulator

Air Relief Valve

Calibrated PressureGauge

Main Control Valve

Run Kaizen Event

• Check Improvement•Act Upon Observations

33

Finish Ordering Parts and Tools• Ensure all orders have been made • Identify lead times

• Work with maintenance to develop work schedule• Generate Move Schedule

MSD II Quarter Progress Week 1 Week 2 Week 3 Week 4 Week 5 Week 6 Week 7 Week 8 Week 9 Week 10

Look at Kaizen Bursts Already Established• Choose ones that can be accomplished• Set Priorities

Obtain Data on Consignment Parts• Understand process• Obtain usage and stock out numbers • Perform Statistical Analysis

on Collected Data• Determine Schedule of Orders, Quantity, etc.

Establish New Checkout Procedure

Propose

• Monitor Process• Make Changes & Adjust to Observations

Begin Moves in Accordance to Move Schedule

• Observe Changes Made to Weld Booths • Make Additional Changes Where see Fit

Run Kaizen Event

• Check Improvement•Act Upon Observations

Run Kaizen Event

• Check Improvement•Act Upon Observations

• Make presentation to D-R personnel

Objective Project EvaluationObjective Project Evaluation Design Strengths

Successfully moved 9 welders out from under a 250 ton overhead crane

Designed new safety cage for the Hydrostatic Testing table

Improved final packaging capacity by 33%

Design Weaknesses

The original intent was to develop lean improvements at little or no cost

The full extent and the results of the changes to be implemented can not yet be

proven

Potential Future Projects

Analysis of the advantages/disadvantages of having a dedicated conveyance

operator in the Consignment cage

Development of a barcode or other tracking system for parts in Consignment

Further consignment inventory reduction and thorough analysis of part re-order

points

34

Questions?Questions?

Cost Analysis

Item System Description Part. No. Price Qty. Total

1

Hydro

High Pressure Ball Valve - 10,000 psi max

4FL-HB4LPKR-SSP 263.84 3 791.52

2High Pressure Gauges -

10,000 psi451377SS04BXS4TS0S 235.00 2 470.00

3High Pressure Safety Head –

10,000 psi10-61AM4 90.10 1 90.10

4High Pressure Rupture Disc

- 10,000 psiRD10000  41.30 2 82.60

5

Air

*Pressure Gauge 251009SW02B30/15 88.00 1 88

6 *Control Valve TBD  20.00 1 20

7 Blow Off Valve Model 377 313.45 1 313.45

Hydro Total 1434.22

Air Total 421.45

Total 1855.67* Indicates an Estimation