p. picci, a. van maldegem, e. palmerini, p.d.s. dijkstra, m. alberghini, j.v.m.g. bovee,
DESCRIPTION
P. Picci, A. van Maldegem, E. Palmerini, P.D.S. Dijkstra, M. Alberghini, J.V.M.G. Bovee, P. Ruggieri, C. Ferrari, S. Ferrari, H. Gelderblom. Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy and Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
P. Picci, A. van Maldegem, E. Palmerini, P.D.S. Dijkstra, M. Alberghini, J.V.M.G. Bovee,
P. Ruggieri, C. Ferrari, S. Ferrari, H. Gelderblom.
Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy and
Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands
P. Picci, A. van Maldegem, E. Palmerini, P.D.S. Dijkstra, M. Alberghini, J.V.M.G. Bovee,
P. Ruggieri, C. Ferrari, S. Ferrari, H. Gelderblom.
Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy and
Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands
Outcome of advanced/inoperable central chondrosarcomas.
Outcome of advanced/inoperable central chondrosarcomas.
Aim of the studyAim of the study
Little is known about the survival of central chondrosarcomas when surgical removal of local or metastatic disease is
considered unfeasible. Particularly no information is available on
survival in this condition.
Little is known about the survival of central chondrosarcomas when surgical removal of local or metastatic disease is
considered unfeasible. Particularly no information is available on
survival in this condition.
Definition of advanced/inoperable central chondrosarcoma
Definition of advanced/inoperable central chondrosarcoma
A tumor that, at first presentation, or after treatment, surgically cannot be rendered totally disease free, for local extension or
metastatic lesions
A tumor that, at first presentation, or after treatment, surgically cannot be rendered totally disease free, for local extension or
metastatic lesions
PatientsPatients
Data from 2 major European Centers: Rizzoli Orthopedic Institute (IOR) Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)
171 inoperable pts (IOR 126, LUMC 45) 49 cases at first diagnosis. 122 cases after one or more relapses.
Inoperable after 23.5 mos (1-233) from 1st diagnosis
Data from 2 major European Centers: Rizzoli Orthopedic Institute (IOR) Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)
171 inoperable pts (IOR 126, LUMC 45) 49 cases at first diagnosis. 122 cases after one or more relapses.
Inoperable after 23.5 mos (1-233) from 1st diagnosis
Stage in inoperable patientsStage in inoperable patients
Local disease only 45
(26%)
Lung only 72
(42%)
Local + lung 39
(23%)
Disseminated disease 15 (9%)
Local disease only 45
(26%)
Lung only 72
(42%)
Local + lung 39
(23%)
Disseminated disease 15 (9%)
SurvivalSurvival
Overall survival for all 171 pts was:
48% at 1 year
24% at 2 years
12% at 3 years
6% at 4 years
2% at 5 years
Median time to death was 11 months with a range of 1-106 months
Overall survival for all 171 pts was:
48% at 1 year
24% at 2 years
12% at 3 years
6% at 4 years
2% at 5 years
Median time to death was 11 months with a range of 1-106 months
0
,2
,4
,6
,8
1
0 12 24 36 48 60 72 84 96 108 120months
0
,2
,4
,6
,8
1
0 12 24 36 48 60 72 84 96 108 120months
Cum
. Sur
viva
l
months
Cum
. Sur
viva
l
0
,2
,4
,6
,8
1
0 12 24 36 48 60 72 84 96 108 120
months
Cum
. Sur
viva
l
0
,2
,4
,6
,8
1
0 12 24 36 48 60 72 84 96 108 120
Non Significant VariablesNon Significant Variables
OS and GenderOS and Gender
OS and Site(Axial or Extremity) OS and Site(Axial or Extremity)
OS and Operable vs Inoperable at Diagnosis
OS and Operable vs Inoperable at Diagnosis
Cum. Survival (M)Cum. Survival (F)
Cum. Survival (E)Cum. Survival (A)
Unresect after first treat
Unres at first diagnosis
P-Value 0.1330P-Value 0.1330
P-Value 0.5849P-Value 0.5849
P-Value 0.4115P-Value 0.4115
Histological Grade at first diagnosis/after progression
Histological Grade at first diagnosis/after progression
GradeInoperable, at diagnosis
Treated, at 1st diagnosis
Final
1 2 (4%) 7 (5%) 4 (2%)
2 34 (69%) 80 (66%) 93 (54%)
3 13 (27%) 35 (29%) 66 (39%)
Dediff 0 0 8 (5%)
OS and Grade at 1st diagnosis OS and Grade at 1st diagnosis
OS and Grade after progressionOS and Grade after progression
0
,2
,4
,6
,8
1
Cum
. S
urv
ival
0 12 24 36 48 60 72 84 96 108 120months
Grade 3 Grade 2
Grade 1
P-Value 0.0187P-Value 0.0187
0
,2
,4
,6
,8
1
0 20 40 60 80 100 120Time
Dediff
32
1
Cum
. S
urv
ival
P-Value 0.0043P-Value 0.0043 P-Value 0.0039P-Value 0.0039
0
,2
,4
,6
,8
1
0 20 40 60 80 100 120Time
Three Dediff One Two
Cum
. S
urv
ival
Survival by Stage of DiseaseSurvival by Stage of Disease
Local disease only: 26% at 36 mos (median 18, range 1-
104)
Lung only: 7% at 36 mos (median 11, range 1-51)
Local + lung: 8% at 36 mos (median 9, range 1-106)
Disseminated: 0% at 24 mos (median 7, range 2-24)
p = 0.0014
Local disease only: 26% at 36 mos (median 18, range 1-
104)
Lung only: 7% at 36 mos (median 11, range 1-51)
Local + lung: 8% at 36 mos (median 9, range 1-106)
Disseminated: 0% at 24 mos (median 7, range 2-24)
p = 0.0014
0
,2
,4
,6
,8
1
Cum
. S
urvi
val
0 12 24 36 48 60 72 84 96 108 120months
OS and stage of inoperable diseaseOS and stage of inoperable disease
P-Value 0.0049P-Value 0.0049
multiple sites
lung only
local + lung
local only
Role of non surgical treatmentsRole of non surgical treatments
37 pts received systemic antitumour treatment, with a survival of 26% at 36 months, compared to 8% for those pts
who did not receive it.
37 pts received systemic antitumour treatment, with a survival of 26% at 36 months, compared to 8% for those pts
who did not receive it.
OS and Medical Treatment (all pts) OS and Medical Treatment (all pts)
P-Value 0.0487P-Value 0.0487
Pts with metastasis only (local & local + met excluded)Pts with metastasis only (local & local + met excluded)
P-Value 0.0082P-Value 0.0082
0
,2
,4
,6
,8
1
0 12 24 36 48 60months
Cum
. S
urvi
val
Cum. Survival (YES)
Cum. Survival (NO)
0
,2
,4
,6
,8
1
0 12 24 36 48 60 72 84 96 108 120months
Cum. Survival (YES)
Cum. Survival (NO)
Cum
. S
urvi
val
Role of non surgical treatmentsRole of non surgical treatments
Radiotherapy was given in 36 pts and survival was 27% at 36
months vs 8% for those who did not receive it.
Radiotherapy was given in 36 pts and survival was 27% at 36
months vs 8% for those who did not receive it.
0
,2
,4
,6
,8
1
0 12 24 36 48 60 72 84 96 108 120months
0
,2
,4
,6
,8
1
0 12 24 36 48 60 72 84 96 108 120
months
0
,2
,4
,6
,8
1
0 12 24 36 48 60 72 84 96 108 120months
OS and Radiotherapy (all pts) OS and Radiotherapy (all pts)
P-Value0.1052P-Value0.1052
OS and Radiotherapy (Local only)OS and Radiotherapy (Local only)P-Value 0.0032P-Value 0.0032
OS and Radiotherapy (Local + met)OS and Radiotherapy (Local + met)
P-Value0.1063P-Value0.1063
Cum. Survival (YES)Cum. Survival (NO)
Cum. Survival (YES)
Cum. Survival (NO)
Cum. Survival (YES)
Cum. Survival (NO)
Cum
. Sur
viva
l
ConclusionsConclusions
This pooled analysis of the largest series of inoperable chondrosarcoma pts allowed us to gain insight on prognosis of these pts who can serve as benchmark for future studies.
These data indicate the need for further investigation on the role of systemic treatment (in metastatic pts ?) and radiotherapy (in locally advanced pts ?)
This pooled analysis of the largest series of inoperable chondrosarcoma pts allowed us to gain insight on prognosis of these pts who can serve as benchmark for future studies.
These data indicate the need for further investigation on the role of systemic treatment (in metastatic pts ?) and radiotherapy (in locally advanced pts ?)