ozone without borders - caries...
TRANSCRIPT
© Dr Julian Holmes 2011
caries management
research & clinical application
© Dr Julian Holmes 2011
present dentistry
It is a sad fact of life that every dentist is trained
that if there is an area of decay in a tooth, the only
way to treat this is to drill the decay out or
amputate it, and then place a filling, which will
need replacement at some time in the future; at
worse, the tooth may have to be removed.
© Dr Julian Holmes 2011
present dentistry
© Dr Julian Holmes 2011
present dentistry
© Dr Julian Holmes 2011
present dentistry
© Dr Julian Holmes 2011
present dentistry
© Dr Julian Holmes 2011
infection? let‟s amputate!
© Dr Julian Holmes 2011
easy to apply + great results
© Dr Julian Holmes 2011
dentistry can change peoples lives
1996; 11; 22 1998; 12; 10
© Dr Julian Holmes 2011
• dull
• leathery
• shiny
• hard, remineralised
caries reversal
© Dr Julian Holmes 2011
research in dental care
• 0 1 2 3 4
SoftHard Leathery
Progression
Reversal
0 1 2 3 4
SoftHard Leathery
ProgressionProgression
ReversalReversal
© Dr Julian Holmes 2011
~ diagnosis & evaluation; research results
Holmes J & Lynch E, 2001 (from Lussi A, Caries Research, 1999; 33, 297)
3+ mm into dentine CSI 5> 30Visible on X-rays -> DV
1-2mm into dentine CSI 425~29? visible on X-rays -> DV
at the edj CSI 320~24stain -> DV
confined to enamel CSI 210~19white spot -> DV
extent of carious lesionDIAGNOdent Values
a basic guide to the DIAGNOdent values & The CSI
caries diagnosis
© Dr Julian Holmes 2011
caries diagnosis
Holmes J, 2007 (from Holmes J & Lynch E, 2001)
© Dr Julian Holmes 2011
caries diagnosis
Index Clinical Severity IndexDIAGNOdent
Reading
Clinical
CriteriaOperative Care
Treatment
(seconds)
Sessions
requiredProtocol
0
Severity Index 0.
Lesion arrested (defined as deemed to
have had infected demineralised
dentine or enamel where clinical
remineralisation of the under lying
dentine and enamel is considered to be
complete) This scenario is where
clinical remineralisation of the
underlying dentine is considered to be
complete with no infection remaining
in dentine or enamel. No frosting in
the fissure will be visible after drying.
Varies
due to stain
uptake by
remineralised
tissue
hard, shiny
surface no
frosting
open fissure,
O3 + glass
ionomer or
resin sealant
combine
ozone with air
abrasion
1 x 60-
second
ozone
cycles
Single
treatment
session
open lesion,
remove any
debris, O3,
mineral wash,
glass ionomer
or resin
sealant & OHI
1
Severity Index 1.
Lesion deemed to be reversing
(defined as deemed to have infected
demineralised dentine or enamel that
is reversing) This scenario is where
clinical remineralisation of the
underlying dentine is considered to be
in the process of remineralising the
demineralised dentine, but is not yet
complete. The frosted enamel in the
fissure (visible after drying) will be
reducing.
Varies
due to stain
uptake by
remineralised
tissue
dried lesion
appears
frosted,
white
demineralis
ation
open fissure,
O3 + glass
ionomer or
resin sealant
combine
ozone with air
abrasion
1 x 60-
second
ozone
cycles
Single
treatment
session
open lesion,
remove any
debris, O3,
mineral wash,
glass ionomer
or resin
sealant & OHI
© Dr Julian Holmes 2011
Index Clinical Severity IndexDIAGNOdent
ReadingClinical Criteria Operative Care
Treatment
(seconds)
Sessions
requiredProtocol
2
Severity Index 2.
Lesion deemed to require fissure sealant
with a preventative resin restoration
(define this as deemed to have enamel
caries confined to the enamel and NOT
extending to the amelodentinal junction)
10 - 19
dried lesion
appears frosted,
white
demineralisation
open
lesion,
remove
debris,
O3 +
glass
ionomer
combine
ozone
with air
abrasion
1 x 60-
second
ozone
cycles
Single
treatment
session
open lesion,
remove soft
debris, O3,
mineral wash,
glass ionomer or
resin sealant &
OHI
3
Severity Index 3.
Lesion deemed to require drilling and
filling with a preventative resin
restoration (define this as deemed to have
enamel caries extending to the
amelodentinal junction but not beyond
into dentine)
20 - 24
dried lesion
appears frosted,
white
demineralisation
open
lesion,
remove
debris,
O3 +
glass
ionomer
combine
ozone
with air
abrasion
1 x 60-
second
ozone
cycles
Single
treatment
session
open lesion,
remove soft
debris, O3,
mineral wash,
glass ionomer or
resin sealant &
OHI
4
Severity Index 4.
Lesion deemed to require drilling and
filling (define this as deemed to have
infected dentine extending less than one
millimeter into dentine)
25 - 29
dried lesion
appears frosted,
white enamel
demineralisation,
soft dentine
open
lesion,
remove
debris,
O3 +
glass
ionomer
combine
ozone
with air
abrasion
1 x 60-
second
ozone
cycles
Single
treatment
session
open lesion,
remove soft
debris, O3,
mineral wash,
glass ionomer &
OHI
5
Severity Index 5.
Lesion deemed to require drilling and
filling (define this as deemed to have
infected dentine extending one to two
millimeters into dentine)
25 - 29
dried lesion
appears frosted,
white enamel
demineralisation,
soft dentine,
possible pulp
exposure in
deciduous teeth
open
lesion,
remove
debris,
O3 +
glass
ionomer
combine
ozone
with
operativ
e care
2 x 60-
second
ozone
cycles
Single
treatment
session
open lesion fully,
remove soft
debris, saucerise
lesion, O3, leave
open to
remineralise, use
glass ionomers &
OHI
caries diagnosis
© Dr Julian Holmes 2011
caries diagnosis
Index Clinical Severity IndexDIAGNOdent
ReadingClinical Criteria Operative Care
Treatment
(seconds)
Sessions
requiredProtocol
6
Severity Index 6.
Lesion deemed to require drilling
and filling (define this as deemed to
have infected dentine extending two
or more millimeters into dentine)
30 - 50
dried lesion appears
frosted, white enamel
demineralisation, soft
dentine, possible pulp
exposure
multi-
appointment
& stage
treatment
protocol
combine
ozone
with
operative
care
3+ 60-
second
ozone
cycles
Multiple
treatment
sessions
open lesion
fully, remove
soft debris,
saucerise lesion,
O3, leave open
to remineralise,
use glass
ionomers & OHI
7
Severity Index 7.
Lesion deemed to require drilling
and filling (define this as deemed to
have heavily infected dentine
extending over 3 millimeters into
dentine)
51 - 90
dried lesion appears
frosted, white enamel
demineralisation, soft
dentine, probable
pulp exposure
multi-
appointment
& stage
treatment
protocol
combine
ozone
with
operative
care
4+ 60-
second
ozone
cycles
Multiple
treatment
sessions
open lesion
fully, remove
soft debris,
saucerise lesion,
O3, leave open
to remineralise,
use glass
ionomers & OHI
8
Severity Index 8.
Lesion deemed to require drilling
and filling (define this as deemed to
have heavily infected dentine
extending over 3 millimeters into
dentine)
over 90
reading is
beyond the
limits of the
DIAGNOdent
dried lesion appears
frosted, white enamel
demineralisation, soft
dentine, probable
pulp exposure
multi-
appointment
& stage
treatment
protocol
combine
ozone
with
operative
care
4+ 60-
second
ozone
cycles
Multiple
treatment
sessions
open lesion
fully, remove
soft debris,
saucerise lesion,
O3, leave open
to remineralise,
use glass
ionomers & OHI
© Dr Julian Holmes 2011
early enamel caries
• enamel under acid attack
• enamel demineralises
• mineral loss leads to clinical changes
• O3 eliminates bacteria & acids
• mineral applied wash onto enamel
• fuji7 applied to enamel fissures
– long-term fluoride release
– prevents debris impaction
• remineralised enamel > resistance
• alternative to fissure sealant
– fast
– easy to apply
– predictable
ozone therapies in dental care
© Dr Julian Holmes 2011
ozone therapies in dental care
© Dr Julian Holmes 2011
ozone therapies in dental care
© Dr Julian Holmes 2011
ozone therapies in dental care
© Dr Julian Holmes 2011
ozone therapies in dental care
© Dr Julian Holmes 2011
clinical examples – the early carious lesion
ozone therapies in dental care
enamel demineralisation
„white spots‟
© Dr Julian Holmes 2011
~ treatment of occlusal decay
clinical examples – the early carious lesion
ozone therapies in dental care
example 1
• enamel decay
• early demineralisation
• confined to enamel/EDJ
© Dr Julian Holmes 2011
Clinical Reversal of Occlusal Pit and Fissure Carious Lesions (OPFCLs)
Holmes J1 and Lynch E2. 1 Adentec & UKSmiles, Wokingham, Berkshire, UK2Health and Healthcare Group, School of Dentistry, Queen’s University Belfast, Northern Ireland
Introduction
Aim
Materials and Methods
Conclusions
Discussion
No
1306
Recent reports in the UK national press have lead to
an interest by the general public in ozone
technologies. This study, ‘Clinical Reversal of
Occlusal Pit and Fissure Carious Lesions (OPFCLs)
using Ozone in General Dental Practice’ was set up
to assess the effects of the use of ozone on occlusal
pit and fissure caries in a general dental practice.
The aim of this study was to observe and measure the
Clinical Reversal, Stabilisation or Progression of
Clinical Reversal of Occlusal Pit and Fissure Carious
Lesions (OPFCLs) using Ozone in a General Dental
Practice.
The data sets were obtained from 237 patients with 978
occlusal pit and fissure carious lesions (OPFCLs), who
presented to UKSmiles, a general dental practice, near London,
over a period from December 2001 through to the end of August
2002, and subsequently attended a 2-month recall.
Each tooth was randomized and assigned to two groups; a, be
treated with O3 or b, left as a control. All surfaces to be
measured were cleaned with the ProphyFlex (KaVo) and each
lesion assigned an index number using a Clinical Severity Index
(CSI) as shown in Table 1b. This Index value was recorded.
Various indices have been used in past studies, and a Clinical
Severity Index (CSI, Table 1), developed by Professor Edward
Lynch (Queens University, Belfast) & Dr Julian Holmes
(UKSmiles, Wokingham) was used to determine how long each
lesion was to be treated with ozone. This treatment time varied
from 0 seconds for the lowest (0) CSI score to 40 seconds with
the highest (5) CSI score. The CSI used in this study was based
on the Ekstrand index for clinical caries detection. The Ekstrand
Index was modified to allow easy and fast indexing of lesions in
a general dental practice environment, so that once this pilot
study is completed, other general dental practices could send in
data for an extended study using reproducible criteria.
Over 99% of the ozone treated primary occlusal fissure carious
lesions had clinically reversed based on the clinical severity index
and the DIAGNOdent readings (P<0.001). The control primary
occlusal fissure carious lesions, which had not received any ozone
treatment, did not significantly change. Patients love this system; it is
pain free, fast, and they are happy to pay for this treatment modality
The mean DIAGNOdent (DV) and CSI values are shown in Table
2. The mean DV in the O3 group decreased compared to baseline
measurements (p < 0.01) showing remineralisation. There was no
statistical difference between start DVs and finish DVf in the control
group. There were statistically significant differences in the
changes in DIAGNOdent readings between the treated lesions
after an average of 2 months, and between the O3 group / control
group at the 2-month review (p < 0.001). The table shows that the
O3 group averaged DVs reading of 65 at the start and at recall, the
O3 group had a DVf average of 16. The control group averaged DVs
reading of 63 at the start of the study period & at recall this
changed to 66. The majority of the control lesions showed little
improvement or signs of remineralisation.
Results - Statistics
The Clinical Severity Index above was the primary outcome variable.
Three Ozone treated lesions showed increased DIAGNOdent values
at the recall visit. These lesions consisted of exposed dentine which
had become darker in colour. In these lesions, it is postulated that
the remineralisation process has led to an increase in the stain or
colouration of the lesions. The DIAGNOdent is very sensitive to
stains, which is why the cleaning protocol prior to DIAGNOdent
assessment is so important. The results acquired from this ozone
study mirror those from other clinical research trials in other research
centres. By increasing the O3 Tx time up to 40 seconds, the re-
mineralisation observed has become more predictable.
Table 1; Clinical Severity Index
Table 2; DV & CSI Data
Table 3 & 4; Changes in the DV & CSI Data
References1. Baysan A., Whiley RA., Lynch E. Antimicrobial effect of a novel ozone-
generating device on micro-organisms associated with primary root carious
lesions in vitro. Caries Res. 2000; 34:498-501.
2. Baysan A., Lynch E. and Grootveld M. The use of ozone for the
management of primary root carious lesions. Quintessence Publishing Group
2001; 49-67.
3. Patients Attitudes to Managing Caries with Ozone. H.DOMINGO*, L. ABU-
NABA'A, H. AL SHORMAN, C.SMITH, R. FREEMAN and E.LYNCH. (Health
and Health Care Research Centre, School of Dentistry, Queen’s University
Belfast, Northern Ireland.) J Dent Res, 2002
© Dr Julian Holmes 2011
Clinical Reversal of Occlusal Carious Lesions (OCLs)
Holmes J.
Health and Healthcare Group, School of Dentistry, Queen’s University Belfast, Northern Ireland
No
2752
Table 4; O3 Treatment DV & CSI
Data
Introduction
There is a great deal of interest by the general public in ozone technologies,
following press reports of this new treatment modality for tooth decay. This
study, „Clinical Reversal of Occlusal Carious Lesions (OCLs) using Ozone in
General Dental Practice‟ is based on a previous study, „Clinical Reversal of Pit
& Fissure Carious Lesions‟, published in 2002 by Holmes J et al, with
extended data.
Aim
The aim of this study was to observe and measure the Clinical Reversal,
Stabilisation or Progression of Occlusal Carious Lesions (OCLs) using Ozone
in a General Dental Practice.
Materials and Methods
The data sets were obtained from 376 patients with 2364 occlusal carious
lesions (OCLs), who presented to UKSmiles, a general dental practice, near
London, over a period from July 2001 through to the end of December 2002.
All these patients have been reviewed for a minimum of 6 months. The early
patients have now been followed for 18 months.(Table 1)
Each tooth was randomized and assigned to two groups; a, be treated with O3
or b, left as a control. All surfaces to be measured were cleaned with the
ProphyFlex (KaVo) and each lesion assigned an index number using a Clinical
Severity Index (CSI) as shown in Table 2. This Index value was recorded.
Various indices have been used in past studies, and a Clinical Severity Index
(Table 2), developed by Holmes et al, 2002 was used to determine treatment
time with o2one. This treatment time varied from 0 seconds for the lowest (0)
CSI score to 40 seconds with the highest (5) CSI score. The CSI used in this
study is based on the Ekstrand index.The CSI & DIAGNOdent (KaVo) allow
easy and fast indexing of lesions in a general dental practice environment, so
that other general dental practices can contribute data for an extended
European study using reproducible criteria.
Results – Statistics
The increased data sets have confirmed the earlier study results published in
2002, with no change in the results.
The mean DIAGNOdent (DV) and CSI values are shown in Table 3. The
mean DV in the O3 group decreased compared to baseline measurements (p <
0.01) showing remineralisation. There was no statistical difference between
start DVs and finish DVf in the control group. There were statistically
significant differences in the changes in DIAGNOdent readings between the
treated lesions after an average of 2 months, and between the O3 group /
control group at the 2-month review (p < 0.001). The table shows that the O3
group averaged DVs reading of 65 at the start and at recall, the O3 group had a
DVf average of 16. The control group averaged DVs reading of 63 at the start
of the study period & at recall this changed to 66. The majority of the control
lesions showed little improvement or signs of remineralisation.
Results – Statistics (ctd)
The CSI scores are shown in Table 4 . The majority of lesions reversed from CSI 4 to 0
in the ozone group, when compared to the control group (p < 0.001). The control group
overall showed no improvement. At the first assessment, 90% of all lesions for O3 Tx
fall into categories 3, 4 & 5, & 67% of all lesions for O3 Tx fall into CSI groups 5 & 4.
After O3 treatment, the CSI data shows 93% of the O3 Tx lesions falling into CSI 0 &
1.
There is a clear shift in the distribution of DVs, to DV f in Table 4, showing a clear
trend towards remineralisation. 61% of all lesions were assessed with a DVs of >50,
compared to a DVf at recall where 97% of all lesions had changed to a DVf of <30.
This finding is supported by earlier studies where the treatment time was limited to 10
or 20 seconds (1,2).
Discussion
The Clinical Severity Index has continued to prove a valuable assessment tool, and is
now used in dental practices which offer ozone treatment in the UK . Three Ozone
treated lesions showed increased DIAGNOdent values at the recall visit. These lesions
consisted of exposed dentine which had become darker in colour. In these lesions, it is
postulated that the remineralisation process has led to an increase in the stain or
colouration of the lesions. The DIAGNOdent is very sensitive to stains, which is why
the cleaning protocol prior to DIAGNOdent assessment is so important. The results
acquired from this ozone study mirror those from other clinical research trials in other
research centres. By increasing the O3 Tx time up to 40 seconds, the re-mineralisation
observed has become more predictable.
Conclusions
Over 99% of the ozone treated occlusal fissure carious lesions had clinically reversed
based on the clinical severity index and the DIAGNOdent readings (P<0.001). The
control primary occlusal fissure carious lesions, which had not received any ozone
treatment, did not significantly change.
Patients who are offered this treatment modality, as an alternative to conventional
amputation therapy have embraced this new technology. Research by Domingo H
(2002) has shown there is little anxiety and fear associated with this treatment method,
and it has wide application in the treatment of patients of all ages. Treatment is pain
free, fast, and patients are happy to pay for this treatment modality
ReferencesBaysan A., Whiley RA., Lynch E. Antimicrobial effect of a novel ozone-generating device on micro-
organisms associated with primary root carious lesions in vitro. J Caries Research 2000; 34:498-501.
Domingo H, Abu-Naba'a L, Al Shorman H, Smith C, Freeman R & Lynch E. Patients Attitudes to Managing
Caries with Ozone.. (Health and Health Care Research Centre, School of Dentistry, Queen‟s University
Belfast, Northern Ireland.) J Dent Res, 2002
Holmes J & Lynch E, Clinical Reversal of Pit & Fissure Carious Lesions‟ (Health and Health Care Research
Centre, School of Dentistry, Queen‟s University Belfast, Northern Ireland.) J Caries Research 2002
Table 2; CSI
Table 3; DV & CSI Data
Dr Julian Holmes, June 2003
Table 1; patient treatment/review
Recall Review Patients
Reviewed
No. lesions O3
treated
No. lesions
reversed
18 35 157 155
98.7%
12 126 586 584
99.6%
6 98 490 486
99.2%
© Dr Julian Holmes 2011
~ treatment of occlusal decay
clinical examples – the early carious lesion
ozone therapies in dental care
example 1
© Dr Julian Holmes 2011
~ treatment of occlusal decay
clinical examples – the early carious lesion
ozone therapies in dental care
© Dr Julian Holmes 2011
~ treatment of occlusal decay
clinical examples – the early carious lesion
ozone therapies in dental care
© Dr Julian Holmes 2011
enamel & dentine caries
• caries extends through the EDJ
• O3 eliminates bacteria & acids
• mineral applied wash onto enamel
• fuji7 applied to enamel fissures
– long-term fluoride release
– prevents debris impaction
• remineralised dentine amorphous
• alternative to tissue amputation
– fast
– easy to apply
– predictable
ozone therapies in dental care
© Dr Julian Holmes 2011
enamel & dentine caries
ozone therapies in dental care
© Dr Julian Holmes 2011
enamel & dentine caries
ozone therapies in dental care
© Dr Julian Holmes 2011
ozone therapies in dental care
© Dr Julian Holmes 2011
ozone therapies in dental care
© Dr Julian Holmes 2011
ozone therapies in dental care
© Dr Julian Holmes 2011
ozone therapies in dental care
© Dr Julian Holmes 2011
ozone therapies in dental care
© Dr Julian Holmes 2011
ozone therapies in dental care
© Dr Julian Holmes 2011
ozone therapies in dental care
© Dr Julian Holmes 2011
ozone therapies in dental care
© Dr Julian Holmes 2011
ozone therapies in dental care
© Dr Julian Holmes 2011
ozone therapies in dental care
© Dr Julian Holmes 2011
ozone therapies in dental care
© Dr Julian Holmes 2011
• Showed > 86% caries reversal at 24
months
• 10 seconds ozone applied
• BAYSAN1,2 and E. LYNCH1
• Journal of Dental Research 2001
1Restorative Dentistry and Gerodontology, Queen’s
University Belfast, Northern Ireland,
2Department of Adult Oral Health, St. Bart’s and the
Royal London School of Medicine and Dentistry,
London, UK.
research in dental careliterature overview:
© Dr Julian Holmes 2011
Holmes J. Clinical reversal of root caries using
ozone, double-blind, randomised, controlled 18-
month trial. Gerodontology 2003; 20: 106-114.
~ to assess the efficacy of an ozone delivery system
combined with the daily use of a remineralising
toothpaste, mouthrinse and spray for the
management of non- cavitated leathery primary root
carious lesions (PRCL‟s) in an ageing patient group
(>60, mean 70.8yrs, SD+ 6).
ozone treatment of root caries objectives of this study:
research in dental care
© Dr Julian Holmes 2011
results: the detail ~research in dental care
Holmes J showed that 3 months after ozone treatment (40 seconds) 69% of caries
had reversed to hard from CSI 2. Re-treatment at 3, 6, 12 and 18 months, resulted
in 100% of caries reversing to hard by the 18 month and 24 month reviews.
It is difficult to hypothesise whether all caries would have reversed to hard
without re-treatment, although Baysan et al showed that 81% of caries (CSI 1 or
2) had reversed to hard 3 months after a single 20-second ozone treatment.
0 1 2 3 4
SoftHard Leathery
Progression
Reversal
0 1 2 3 4
SoftHard Leathery
ProgressionProgression
ReversalReversal
© Dr Julian Holmes 2011
Economic Savings Treating Root Caries with Ozone or Air AbrasionH. DOMINGO, J. HOLMES, L. ABU-NABA'A, H. AL SHORMAN, A. BAYSAN and R. FREEMAN
Queen's University of Belfast, United Kingdom
IntroductionOzone treatment has been shown to
significantly arrests root carious lesions (1-4).
However no direct time and cost comparison has
been completed comparing Ozone treatment with
conventional dental treatment methods.
AimTo assess if a new technology in a dental practice
(HealOzone 5, Fig.1) could reduce the treatment
time and cost for treatment of primary root caries
at the baseline treatment visit.
Materials and MethodsConclusionOzone, produced by the HealOzone device was
selected for a time comparison with either Air
Abrasion (Fig.2 PrepStart, Danville, USA), and a
glass ionomer filling material (Fig 3. FujiVII, GC
Corp, Japan 6), or traditional drill and fill (D&F)
procedures (using a conventional glass-ionomer
cement) for the management of primary root
caries (PRCL‟s) in an ageing patient group (>60,
mean 70.8yrs, SD 7) in a general dental practice.
A total of 68 subjects with 3 lesions each (204
PRCL‟s in total) were recruited.
Results and Discussion
The combination of modern technologies, such as
air abrasion, with Ozone offer economic savings
for dental practices and patients. Compared with
conventional drilling and filling of root caries,
Ozone treatment offers potential cost savings in
the treatment of caries.
64 subjects completed this study. There were no
observed adverse events. The mean time required
for ozone treatment was 40 seconds (SD 5
seconds) for each lesion. The mean time required
for A&F 9 minutes (540 seconds (SD 90 seconds).
The mean time required for D&F was 27 minutes
(1620 seconds (SD 8 minutes)) (overall p < 0.01).
Ozone treatment was faster than traditional D&F
by a factor of 40 and faster than A&F by 21. Air
abrasion decreased the mean time for cavity
preparation by 4 times when compared to
traditional rotary drills (67 seconds (SD 12)
compared to 4.5 minutes (SD 1.75 minutes) (p <
0.05)).
The cost* of the treatment was assessed. The
average cost to treat a lesion with ozone was
£6.90, with A&F, £13.90; and with D+F £31.10.
The potential NHS fee was assessed as £44.00.
The gross potential profit for Ozone Tx £37.10, for
AA £30.10 and D&F £13.50
*Assumes 3 lesions treated at same appointment, surgery costs
of £60.00/hour & UK NHS Fee Scale (Schedule of Fees June
2003)
The lesions were randomly assigned into three
groups; treatment with;
1.Ozone, or;
2. Air abrasion and filling (A&F), or;
3. Traditional drilling and filling (D&F).
In groups 1 & 2 PRCL preparation was carried out
without the need for local anaesthetics.
Fig.2 The PrepStart
Danville Engineering
USA
Fig.1 The HealOzone device
CurOzone Inc USA &
KaVo GmbH Germany
Fig.3 FujiVII GC
Corp
Japan
Products Used
1. Lynch E, Baysan A, Silwood C, Grootveld M. Therapeutic
oxidising activity of a novel anti-bacterial ozone-producing
device on primary root caries. Caries Res 1998; 32: 300.
2. Baysan A, Whiley R, Lynch E. Antimicrobial effects of a
novel ozone generating device on micro-organisms associated
with primary root carious lesions in-vitro. Caries Res 2000; 34:
498-501.
3. Baysan A, Lynch E. Clinical review of root caries using
ozone. J Dent Res 2002; 81: 733 (Sp Issue).
4. Holmes J. Clinical reversal of root caries using ozone,
double-blind, randomised, controlled 18-month trial.
Gerodontology 2003; 20: 106-114.
5. HealOzone, CurOzone Inc USA & KaVo GmbH Germany.
6. FujiVII, GC Corp Japan.
All lesions were finished with hand instruments
(excavators), before restoration with a glass
ionomer filling material (FujiVII). This modified
ART technique is the subject of further research.
References
© Dr Julian Holmes 2011
At Baseline; 60 subjects, each with 2 soft PRCL‟s.
1 lesion ART+Ozone
ART, leaving pulp unexposed + 20 seconds ozone
10 (+2) minutes treatment time
1 lesion LA, & conventional “drill&fill”
11 pulp exposures requiring RCT
23 (+4) minutes treatment time
At Recall; 56 subjects returned for recall
All restorations scored alpha for all USPHS criteria recorded
(filling present, margins, surface finish)
additional 4 teeth required RCT
Results; 25% of conventionally treated teeth needed RCT
0% of ART + Ozone treated teeth needed RCT
Conclusion; ART + Ozone
1. reduces time
2. saves tooth tissue
3. maintains tooth vitality
4. no detrimental effect to USPHS assessment
~ research ~ Holmes J, 2004, IADR Abstract
ART – Atraumatic Restorative Care
research in dental care
© Dr Julian Holmes 2011
At Baseline; 60 subjects, each with 2 soft PRCL‟s.
1 lesion ART+Ozone
ART, leaving pulp unexposed + 20 seconds ozone
10 (+2) minutes treatment time
1 lesion LA, & conventional “drill&fill”
11 pulp exposures requiring RCT
23 (+4) minutes treatment time
At Recall; 56 subjects returned for recall
All restorations scored alpha for all USPHS criteria recorded
(filling present, margins, surface finish)
additional 4 teeth required RCT
Results; 25% of conventionally treated teeth needed RCT
0% of ART + Ozone treated teeth needed RCT
Conclusion; ART + Ozone
1. reduces time
2. saves tooth tissue
3. maintains tooth vitality
4. no detrimental effect to USPHS assessment
~ research ~ Holmes J, 2004, IADR Abstract
ART – Atraumatic Restorative Care
research in dental care
© Dr Julian Holmes 2011
initial presentation air abrasion preparation
combined therapies in dental care
~ enamel + dentine decay;
example 3
© Dr Julian Holmes 2011
aa presentation after hand-instrumentation
combined therapies in dental care
~ enamel + dentine decay
© Dr Julian Holmes 2011
~ enamel + dentine decay
enamel etch finished preparation
combined therapies in dental care
© Dr Julian Holmes 2011
fujiVII placement 6-month assessment
combined therapies in dental care
~ enamel + dentine decay
© Dr Julian Holmes 2011
initial presentation #26
combined therapies in dental care
~ enamel + dentine decay
example 4
© Dr Julian Holmes 2011
after air abrasion #26
combined therapies in dental care
~ enamel + dentine decay
after ozone 40 seconds #26
© Dr Julian Holmes 2011
mineral wash application #26
combined therapies in dental care
~ enamel + dentine decay
ready to fill #26
© Dr Julian Holmes 2011
fujiVII application #26
combined therapies in dental care
~ enamel + dentine decay
occlusion re-established #26
© Dr Julian Holmes 2011
barbara age 38
time to treat; 5 minutes
combined therapies in dental care
example 5
© Dr Julian Holmes 2011
ozone therapies in dental care
~ enamel + dentine decay
integrated treatment:
example 7
© Dr Julian Holmes 2011
ozone therapies in dental care
~ enamel + dentine decay
integrated treatment:
© Dr Julian Holmes 2011
~ treatment for patients; Abigall; 7-month results
ozone therapies in dental care
Abigall Summers
Referring Dentist Oloph Granath, USA
Before O3 Tx; 02-02-04 After O3 Tx; 28-09-04
© Dr Julian Holmes 2011
~ treatment results to date. Charlotte
ozone therapies in dental care
21-10-02
15-04-04
Before O3
After O3
O3 treatment started
21-10-02.
Review 15-04-04, 18-months
after the first application of O3
© Dr Julian Holmes 2011
~ treatment for patients with secondary teeth
3 months later
Victoria Age 12
29th January 2003
Review & Assessment
05/11/2002 29/01/2003
combined therapies in dental care
Before O3 After O3
© Dr Julian Holmes 2011
~ treatment for patients with secondary teeth
29/01/2003
results at 3 months
combined therapies in dental care
Before O3 After O3
Photographs © Dr Rob Wain, UK
© Dr Julian Holmes 2011
• Does ozone damage dental nerve / pulp tissue?
• Chou J, Boyd D, Tompkins G. Effect of Ozone Treatment on Interleukin Levels in Dental Pulp IADR Abstract 0036, 2005
• Objective: To determine whether therapeutic levels of ozone stimulate production of the inflammatory cytokines interleukin-2 (IL-2) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) in healthy teeth.
• Conclusion: From the experiment, there was no evidence that ozone treatment stimulated an increase in the levels of IL-6 and IL-2 in healthy dental pulp.
• This suggests that ozone elicits negligible inflammatory responses (if not reduces levels of inflammation) when applied to healthy teeth, and may have potential for prophylactic treatment of patients with high caries risk.
research in dental care
© Dr Julian Holmes 2011
enamel & dentine caries
ozone therapies in dental care
• limitations of ozone
cannot bring life to dead tissue
© Dr Julian Holmes 2011
• integration into routine dental care
ozone therapies in dental care
© Dr Julian Holmes 2011
ozone therapies in dental care
~ ozone integrated into routine dental care
example 8
© Dr Julian Holmes 2011
Tofflemyre matrix band
surrounds 4.5 after cavity
preparation.
Deepest caries has not been
removed, attempting to
prevent a need for root
canal treatment.
Circumference must be
sealed with block-out resin
(below) before ozone can
be delivered to kill bacteria
in the remaining carious
layer.
Photographs © Dr Melvin Perlmutter
integrated treatment:ozone therapies in dental care
example 9
© Dr Julian Holmes 2011
~ treatment for patients with primary teeth
jade,
• age 4, 11 months
• time to treat; 4 minutes
ozone therapies in dental care
example 10
© Dr Julian Holmes 2011
Jake; 4 yrs old, attention disorder syndrome
pre-tx: DIAGNOdent 89, soft dentine, in pain
20 seconds O3 each tooth;
Recall & review at 46 days
post-tx: DIAGNOdent 36. hard dentine, no pain
~ treatment results to date
ozone therapies in dental care
example 11
© Dr Julian Holmes 2011
At Baseline; 60 subjects, each with 2 soft PRCL‟s.
1 lesion ART+Ozone
ART, leaving pulp unexposed + 20 seconds ozone
10 (+2) minutes treatment time
1 lesion LA, & conventional “drill&fill”
11 pulp exposures requiring RCT
23 (+4) minutes treatment time
At Recall; 56 subjects returned for recall
All restorations scored alpha for all USPHS criteria recorded
(filling present, margins, surface finish)
additional 4 teeth required RCT
Results; 25% of conventionally treated teeth needed RCT
0% of ART + Ozone treated teeth needed RCT
Conclusion; ART + Ozone
1. reduces time
2. saves tooth tissue
3. maintains tooth vitality
4. no detrimental effect to USPHS assessment
~ research ~ Holmes J, 2004, IADR Abstract
ART – Atraumatic Restorative Care
research in dental care
• ART- application
of research to other
caries presentations
• Using research to
extend the use of
technology
© Dr Julian Holmes 2011
~ treatment for patients with primary teeth
Darryl,
Age 3, 6 months
Time to treat; 5 minutes
#1E #2E
ozone therapies in dental care
example 12
© Dr Julian Holmes 2011
~ treatment for patients with primary teeth
Beth,
Age 4, 1 month
example 13
combined therapies in dental care
1st Appointment. pulpotomy & GA
parents refused Tx
3rd Appointment -18 months later
glass ionomer lost, pain++
dentist has ozone - 60 seconds Tx
glass ionomer transitional fill
2nd Appointment - 6 months later
ART & glass ionomer
© Dr Julian Holmes 2011
~ treatment for patients with primary teeth
Beth,
Age 4, 1 month
example 13
combined therapies in dental care
1st Appointment – pulpotomy & GAHyper-mineralised tissue
Fuji VII
4th Appointment
Pain free
Tissue regeneration & remineralisation
Tooth vital
Space maintained for upper molar
© Dr Julian Holmes 2011
combined therapies in dental care
~ enamel + dentine decay; ozone +ART
example 14
© Dr Julian Holmes 2011
Victoria; 33. mesial decay repaired 12 years ago
~ treatment results to date. Victoria
© Dr Julian Holmes
Area of demineralisation
Ozone treated for 120 seconds, mineral wash applied
combined therapies in dental care
example 15
© Dr Julian Holmes 2011
~ treatment for patients• Other patterns of decay
– treatment for failing abutments
ozone therapies in dental care
example 16
© Dr Julian Holmes 2011
~ treatment for patients• Other patterns of decay
– treatment for failing abutments
ozone therapies in dental care
example 17