oxford talk smmr paper july 2011 final

Upload: nadakhan

Post on 07-Apr-2018

216 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/6/2019 Oxford Talk SMMR Paper July 2011 Final

    1/30

    DrGillianLancaster

    PostgraduateStatisticsCentreLancasterUniversity

    [email protected]

    TrialsinPrimaryCare:design,conductandevaluationofcomplexinterventions

    CentreforExcellenceinTeachingandLearning

  • 8/6/2019 Oxford Talk SMMR Paper July 2011 Final

    2/30

    RSSPrimaryHealthCareStudyGroupCoauthorsofSMMRpaper:

    MikeCampbell,Sheffield

    SandraEldridge,QueenMaryLondon

    AmandaFarrin,LeedsMauriceMarchant,EastSussexPCT

    SaraMuller,Keele

    RafaelPerera,OxfordTimPeters,Bristol

    TobyPrevost,KingsCollege

    GretaRait,UCL

  • 8/6/2019 Oxford Talk SMMR Paper July 2011 Final

    3/30

    1.Introduction

    ResearchinPrimaryCareistimeconsumingandoftenchallenging

    Itrequiresextensiveplanning&prep

    Interventionsareoftencomplexand

    presentarangeofproblemseg.

    Workinginhealthcaresetting

    Sensitivitytolocalcontext

    Logisticsofapplyingexperimentalmethods

  • 8/6/2019 Oxford Talk SMMR Paper July 2011 Final

    4/30

    Whatmakesanintervention

    complex?

    Interactionsbetweencomponentsinexperimentalandcontrolarms

    Difficultyofbehavioursrequiredbythosedeliveringorreceivingtheintervention

    Organisationallevelstargetedbytheintervention

    Variabilityofoutcomes

    Degreeofflexibility/tailoringofinterventionpermitted

    Willitworkineverydaypractice?

    NB.takenfromMRCguidelines

  • 8/6/2019 Oxford Talk SMMR Paper July 2011 Final

    5/30

    Guidance

    MRC

    documentDevelopingandEvaluatingComplexInterventions

    www.mrc.ac.uk/complexinterventionsguidance

    CraigP.etal.BMJ2008,337:a1655

    BMJpaper(CampbellNCetal.2007,334:4559)DesigningandEvaluatingComplexInterventionsto

    improvehealthcare

    Casestudies

    http://www.mrc.ac.uk/complexinterventionsguidancehttp://www.mrc.ac.uk/complexinterventionsguidance
  • 8/6/2019 Oxford Talk SMMR Paper July 2011 Final

    6/30

    KeystatisticaldesignissuesIPhases

    given in MRCguidanceframework

    Key elements in

    designing andevaluating complexinterventions

    General points to consider Key statistical design

    issues addressed in ourpaper

    Development Background andcontext(For more informationand examples see MRC

    and Campbell et al.)

    Socio-economic background;Underlying cultural

    assumptions;Health service system;

    Government initiatives;Preventative policies

    Defining andunderstanding theproblem(See above docs)

    Prevalence of condition;Population most affected;How condition is

    caused/sustained;Potential for intervention and

    improvementConceptualising theproblem(See above docs)

    Levels of complexity of healthproblem and co-morbidity;

    Risk factors and factorsinfluencing changes overtime;

    Patient beliefs, symptoms andadherence to treatment

    Gathering evidence Systematic reviews;Epidemiological research;Qualitative research;Expert opinion

    Using evidence from primarystudies, systematic reviewsand qualitative studies toinform study design

    Developing theintervention

    Identify key processes andmechanisms for delivery;

    Potential beneficial effect;

    Define target group;Optimise best treatment

    combinations

    Conducting primary careresearch in the UK:complying with research

    governance and assessingquality of care using theQuality and OutcomesFramework

  • 8/6/2019 Oxford Talk SMMR Paper July 2011 Final

    7/30

    KeystatisticaldesignissuesII

    Phases given inMRC guidanceframework

    Key elements indesigning andevaluating complexinterventions

    General points to consider Key statistical designissues addressed in ourpaper

    Evaluation Developing and

    optimising trialparameters

    Testing the feasibility and

    integrity of the trial protocol;Consideration of appropriate

    primary/secondaryendpoints;

    Recruitment and retentionstrategies;

    Method of randomisation to

    minimise imbalance;Sample size considerations

    Pilot studies and pre-trial

    modelling;Selection of outcome

    measures for effectivenessand quality;

    Recruitment of practices andparticipants;

    Choosing the method of

    randomisation;Sample size and between

    trial variationData collection andanalysis

    Data collection forms;Design of database;Monitoring procedures;Awareness of issues of data

    analysis for different studydesigns

    Choosing the method of

    analysis: cluster specificversus marginal modelsImplementation Getting evidence into

    practice(See new MRCguidance document)

    Publication and disseminationstrategy;

    Stakeholder involvement;Benefits, harms, costs for

    decision making;Recommendations

  • 8/6/2019 Oxford Talk SMMR Paper July 2011 Final

    8/30

    2.Usingevidencefromprimary

    studies,systematicreviewsand

    qualitativestudiesinthedesign

    Muchhighqualityresearchlacksgeneralisability (externalvalidity)

    Interventionmaynotbeeasilyimplementedinpractice(Who?How?Duration?)

    Strongargumentforcarryingoutresearchin

    themostappropriatecontextandsettingEg.Canwetrustestimateofeffectsizewhen

    interventionstudiestolowerBPafterstroke

    aremostlycarriedoutinsecondarycare?(Mant etalBMJ2006)

  • 8/6/2019 Oxford Talk SMMR Paper July 2011 Final

    9/30

    Usefulbecausebasedonclearlyformulatedresearchquestionsandmethodology

    Quality

    of

    included

    papers

    has

    been

    appraised Summary(pooled)estimateofeffectsize

    Feasibility,acceptabilityanduptakeof

    intervention

    can

    be

    measured

    by

    level

    of

    attrition

    ofparticipants

    Eg.RelativeattritionhasbeenusedtocomparelevelsofattritionacrossoralanticoagulationandDiabetestypeIItrials(Hennekens etal.BMCRes.Methods2007)

    Systematicreviewsofdiagnostictestandmethodcomparisonstudiesalsousefulforselectinganappropriatemeasurementmethod ortechnique

    SystematicreviewsofRCTs

  • 8/6/2019 Oxford Talk SMMR Paper July 2011 Final

    10/30

    Especiallyusefulwhenplanningorevaluatingacomplexintervention

    Canbeused:

    Before thetrialtoexploreissuesofdesigneg.barrierstorecruitment;acceptabilityof therandomisationfromapatientsperspective

    During thetrialtounderstandandunpacktheprocessesofimplementation andchange

    After thetrialtoexplorereasonsforthefindingseg.arefindingsinlinewithunderlyingtheory;acceptabilitytodeliverersandreceivers;comparisonswithpatientreportedoutcomes;

    thevalueoftheintervention asanevaluativeassessmentandtoaidinterpretation

    Qualitativestudies

  • 8/6/2019 Oxford Talk SMMR Paper July 2011 Final

    11/30

    3.

    Conducting

    primary

    care

    researchintheUK

    Publicgenerallytrustsacademicresearch Researchgovernance ensuresresearchintegrity

    toupholdthepublicsconfidence,toprotect

    participantsfromabuse,andtoprotectresearchersfromaccusationsofmisconduct

    Widerangeoflegalrequirementseg.

    European

    Clinical

    Trials

    Directive DataProtectionAct

    EthicalapprovalNB.muchdebateaboutwhetherRECsshould

    examinestatisticalissues&methodologicalrigour

  • 8/6/2019 Oxford Talk SMMR Paper July 2011 Final

    12/30

    GPsareusuallyselfemployedorworkwithina

    limitedcompany;contracttoNHS

    NHSPrimaryCareTrusts(PCTs)commissionGPs

    serviceswithintheirgivenarea

    PCTsfacilitateresearchlocallytoensure

    researchintegrity;researchreviewcommittees

    PrimarycareresearchofteninvolvesseveralGP

    centresacrossmultiplePCTs

    verytimeconsumingtoobtainapproval;

    honorarycontracts;CRBchecksetc.(eg.6months)

    NIHRhaverecentlyintroducedguidanceanda

    ResearchPassportSystemtohelptheprocess

    Researchgovernance

  • 8/6/2019 Oxford Talk SMMR Paper July 2011 Final

    13/30

    Tomonitorqualityofcareofpatients,financial

    incentives(upto30%ofGPincome)havebeen

    introducedthroughtheQualityandOutcomes

    Framework(QOF)

    QOFhas5domainsofincentivisation

    oClinicalcare

    oOrganisation

    oPatientexperience

    o

    Education

    and

    trainingoOtheradditionalservices

    Pointsareawardedaccordingtotheworkload

    neededtoachievetargetsandprevalenceofdisease(age,sex,deprivation)inthearea

    ResearchpotentialofQOF

  • 8/6/2019 Oxford Talk SMMR Paper July 2011 Final

    14/30

    TouseQOFindicatorsinresearcheg.toassess

    differencesinqualityofcare,therearecertain

    problemstoovercome:

    o Exclusionseg.failuretoattendforassessment,

    frailtyofcondition,refusetreatment

    o DifferencesbetweenGPPracticeseg.how

    conditionsarerecorded,howinterventionsare

    assessed,compositionandskillsofpracticestaff

    QOFisprimarilypaymentdrivenandnotcreated

    forresearchpurposes

    Researchdatabaseshavebeencreatedeg.GPRD,

    Qresearch,usingsamplesofGPpractices

    ResearchpotentialofQOF

  • 8/6/2019 Oxford Talk SMMR Paper July 2011 Final

    15/30

    4.Useofpilotstudies

    Important

    pre

    requisite

    for

    funding Oftenadhocsmallstandalonestudies

    Subjecttopublicationbias

    Isthereadifferencebetweenafeasibility

    andapilotstudy?

    Pilotstudiesaddresstheintegrityofthestudyprotocol

    Needclearlistofkeyobjectives

  • 8/6/2019 Oxford Talk SMMR Paper July 2011 Final

    16/30

    Keyobjectivesofapilotstudy

    Testintegrityofstudyprotocol

    Samplesizecalculation

    Recruitmentandconsentrates Developandtestimplementationanddelivery

    oftheintervention

    Acceptabilityoftheintervention Trainstaffindeliveryandassessment

    Selectionofmostappropriateoutcome

    measures

    (endpoints) Randomisationprocedure

    Pilotdatacollectionforms/questionnaires

    Prepareandplandatacollectionandmonitoring

  • 8/6/2019 Oxford Talk SMMR Paper July 2011 Final

    17/30

    Example UKBEAMtrial

    UKBackPain,Exercise,ActivemanagementandManipulationtrial(Farrin etal.2005)

    Totesttheintegrityofthestudyprotocolusingaseriesofsubstudies

    Plannedasclusterrandomisedtrial

    3treatments activemanagement(practicelevel);spinalmanipulationandexercise(patientlevel)

    Findings: Majorityofmethodsweresuccessful

    Problemwithdifferentialrecruitmentbetween

    practices changedtononclustereddesign

  • 8/6/2019 Oxford Talk SMMR Paper July 2011 Final

    18/30

    Pretrialmodelling

    Example Fallspreventiontrial(Eldridgeetal.2005)

    Toinformdesignandtestlikelihoodofthe

    interventionbeingviableandeffective Costeffectivenessmodelusingpilotdata

    o UsedprobabilitytreeandMarkovsimulation

    Findings: Interventionwouldreduceproportionfalling

    byonly2.8%over12months

    Ifpolicymakerswerewillingtospend30,000perQALYgained,therewasstillonlya40%chancetheinterventionwouldbecost

    effective

  • 8/6/2019 Oxford Talk SMMR Paper July 2011 Final

    19/30

    5.Selectionofappropriate

    outcomemeasure(s)

    Distinguishbetweenprimaryandsecondary

    outcomemeasures Validandreliable(repeatable&reproducible)

    Directlymeasuredvs patientreported

    o Includeadditionalobjectivemeasureswhenselfreportingmaybeunreliableeg.selfassessedsmokingcessationandbiochemicalmeasure

    o HRQL usegenericanddiseasespecificmeasure

    Selectmostappropriateoutcomeforevaluatingtheeffectivenessoftheintervention

    eg.levelofkneepain, kneefunction,abilitytowork,satisfactionwithtreatment

    Individuallevelvs group(cluster)level

  • 8/6/2019 Oxford Talk SMMR Paper July 2011 Final

    20/30

    6.

    Recruitment

    Successfulrecruitmentrequiresacoordinatedapproachandgoodpilotwork

    Importanttoengagepracticesearlyono IsresearchquestionimportantforPrimaryCare?

    o Whatisitsprioritycomparedtootherissues?

    o Howdoesitimpactonpatientdoctorrelationship?

    o IsGPconfidenttoraiseresearchissuewithinasensitiveconsultation?

    Timeconstraintsareamajorissue

    Needtofindefficientwaystoidentifythesampleandgainconsent

    Complexinterventionscanhavedifferentlevelsofrecruitment(practices&patients)

  • 8/6/2019 Oxford Talk SMMR Paper July 2011 Final

    21/30

    Principlesofgoodrecruitment Engagewithallstakeholders(GPs,practicestaff

    andparticipants) Brandfortrial(eg.BEAM,PANDA,SCAMPS)

    Welldevelopedmarketingstrategy,goodPReg.BellsPalsytrialusedlocalcelebrityinmedia

    Wellwrittenpatientinformationdocuments

    InvitationtotakepartcomingfromownGP

    UsetrainedstaffotherthanGPstoidentifyandconsentparticipantseg.practicenurses

    Providestafftrainingindiseasetopicandresearch

    GetsupportfromlocalPCRNinfrastructure ResearchReadyaccreditationscheme

    ePCRN (www.ePCRN.org)

    Reimbursepracticesfortakingpart NB.Participantsareallowedtooptout

  • 8/6/2019 Oxford Talk SMMR Paper July 2011 Final

    22/30

    7.Methodofrandomisation

    Byindividualorbyclustereg.GPpractices,households,nursinghomes

    o relativecostsandjustification

    Relativelyfewerclustersthanindividualsare

    usually

    available

    higher

    prob.

    of

    imbalanceo inthesizeofeachtreatmentarm

    o inbaselinecovariatedistributionsatindividuallevel

    Complexinterventionsinprimarycaremayhavemultiplecomponentseg.simpleparalleldesignvs factorialdesign

  • 8/6/2019 Oxford Talk SMMR Paper July 2011 Final

    23/30

    Imbalanceinsizeoftrt groups

    Tooptimisepowerneedtoensure

    o

    an

    equal

    number

    of

    clusters

    in

    each

    treatment

    armo anequalnumberofpeopleineachtreatmentarm

    Toensurebalanceinnumbersofpeopleineach

    armcanuseblockingo interventionsareassignedrandomlywithineachblock

    o varyingblocksizesreducespredictabilityofnext

    assignment Allocationconcealmentisharderinclustertrials

    o eachclustergetssameallocation

    o useofplacebosisnotusuallyfeasible

  • 8/6/2019 Oxford Talk SMMR Paper July 2011 Final

    24/30

    Imbalanceinbaselinecovariates

    Imbalancemayaffectface validityofcomparisonsandoverallconclusions

    Waystominimiseimbalance: Adjustmentbyanalysis mayresultindifferent

    unadjustedandadjustedestimatesoftreatmenteffectso byeffectsizeandsignificance

    o difficultiesininterpretation

    Atthedesignstage byidentifyingselected

    covariateswhichmaybeimportantpredictorsofoutcomeo Randomiseusingstratification prepareaseparate

    randomisationscheduleforeachstrata

    o Useminimisation handleslargernumberofselectedvariables

  • 8/6/2019 Oxford Talk SMMR Paper July 2011 Final

    25/30

  • 8/6/2019 Oxford Talk SMMR Paper July 2011 Final

    26/30

    Samplesize

    Identifyprimaryoutcomemeasureand

    calculatesamplesizeforindividualtrial

    FindestimateofIntraclusterCorrelation

    Coefficient(ICC)

    o Fortrialsrandomisinggeneralpracticeswith

    patientleveloutcomes,ICCsusuallyaround0.05.

    o PapershavebeenpublishedprovidinglistsofICCs

    Multiply(inflate)samplesizebydesigneffecto 1+(m1)xICC wheremisclustersizeassumingall

    clustersizesareequal

    Pre2000manyCRTswereunderpowered

  • 8/6/2019 Oxford Talk SMMR Paper July 2011 Final

    27/30

  • 8/6/2019 Oxford Talk SMMR Paper July 2011 Final

    28/30

    Example DESMONDtrialComparisonof4methodsofanalysis:outcomeistheproportionof

    patientswithanHbA1cbelow7%, interventionisstructurededucn

    Model OddsRatio

    StandardError

    z P > | z | (95% Confidence Interval)

    Cluster

    specific

    1.085539 0.166037 0.54 0.592 (0.804362, 1.465007)

    Population averaged:

    Robust 1.161681 0.271156 0.64 0.521 (0.735194, 1.835573)

    Independent

    errors

    1.161681 0.162818 1.07 0.285 (0.882643, 1.528933)

    Exchangable

    errors

    1.079769 0.160086 0.52 0.605 (0.807480, 1.443876)

  • 8/6/2019 Oxford Talk SMMR Paper July 2011 Final

    29/30

    10.Conclusion

    Presentedmainstatisticalissuesforconductingcomplexinterventions

    ProvidesaflavouroftheissuescoveredinourPHCSGmeetingsoverpast8years

    Balancebetweenmethodologicalissuesandmorepracticalissuesofrealliferesearch

    o manyissuesnotuniquetoprimarycaresetting

    Challengeremainsofmaintainingandexpandingthecapacityofbothmethodologicalandappliedexpertiseinprimarycare

  • 8/6/2019 Oxford Talk SMMR Paper July 2011 Final

    30/30

    Reference LancasterG.A.,CampbellM.C.,EldridgeS.E.,Farrin

    A.,

    Marchant M.,

    Muller

    S.,

    Perera R.,

    Peters

    T.J.,

    PrevostA.T.,Rait G.(2010).TrialsinPrimaryCare:statisticalissuesinthedesign,conductandevaluationofcomplex

    interventions.StatisticalMethodsinMedicalResearch19:34977.

    Facultyof1000publication.

    Primstat data

    archive www.jiscmail.ac.uk/primstat

    presentationsandsummariesofdiscussionsfrommeetingsofPHCSG

    http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/primstathttp://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/primstat