overview of the proton edm proposal at the 10 -29 e cm level yannis k. semertzidis, bnl
DESCRIPTION
Proton EDM Review BNL, 14&15 March 2011. Overview of the proton EDM proposal at the 10 -29 e cm level Yannis K. Semertzidis, BNL. +. -. Motivation (W. Marciano, tomorrow morning) Since last review A working proton EDM lattice, SCT (R. Talman) Beam parameters at BNL (A. Fedotov) - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Overview of the proton EDM proposal at the 10 -29 e cm level Yannis K. Semertzidis, BNL](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022052510/568146b5550346895db3d76c/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
+
-
Overview of the proton EDM proposal at the 10-29ecm level
Yannis K. Semertzidis, BNL•Motivation (W. Marciano, tomorrow morning)•Since last review•A working proton EDM lattice, SCT (R. Talman)•Beam parameters at BNL (A. Fedotov)•E&B-fields; injection (B. Morse)•BPM plans (D. Kawall)•SCT runs at COSY; polarimeter plans (E. Stephenson)•COSY S.R. EDM plan (H. Stroeher)•Software development (Talman, Luccio, Haciomeroglu)
Proton EDM Review BNL, 14&15 March 2011
![Page 2: Overview of the proton EDM proposal at the 10 -29 e cm level Yannis K. Semertzidis, BNL](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022052510/568146b5550346895db3d76c/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Why this review?• The collaboration is putting a proposal together
to be submitted to DOE for CD0
• Evaluate the proposal:
1.Motivation (still current?)
2.EDM-ring lattice (presented well enough?)
3.Beam parameters feasibility?
4.SCT and BPM plans?
5.E-field and B-field (shielding) plans?
6.Cost estimate good enough?
![Page 3: Overview of the proton EDM proposal at the 10 -29 e cm level Yannis K. Semertzidis, BNL](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022052510/568146b5550346895db3d76c/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
EDMs of hadronic systems are mainly sensitive to
• Theta-QCD (part of the SM)
• CP-violation sources beyond the SM
A number of alternative simple systems could provide invaluable complementary information (e.g. neutron, proton, deuteron,…).
• At 10-29ecm is at least an order of magnitude
more sensitive than the current nEDM plans
![Page 4: Overview of the proton EDM proposal at the 10 -29 e cm level Yannis K. Semertzidis, BNL](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022052510/568146b5550346895db3d76c/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Physics reach of magic pEDM (Marciano)
The proton EDM at 10-29e∙cm has a reach of >300TeV or, if new physics exists at the LHC scale, <10-7-10-5 rad CP-violating phase; an unprecedented sensitivity level.
The deuteron EDM sensitivity is similar.
• Sensitivity to SUSY-type new Physics:
• Sensitivity to new contact interaction: 3000 TeV
10 13 Currently: 10 , Sensitivity with pEDM: 0.3 10
pEDM 10 24 ecm sin 1TeV
MSUSY
2
![Page 5: Overview of the proton EDM proposal at the 10 -29 e cm level Yannis K. Semertzidis, BNL](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022052510/568146b5550346895db3d76c/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Two different labs to host the S.R. EDM experiments
• BNL, USA:
proton “magic” ring
• COSY/IKP, Germany: deuteron ring (H. Ströher)
![Page 6: Overview of the proton EDM proposal at the 10 -29 e cm level Yannis K. Semertzidis, BNL](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022052510/568146b5550346895db3d76c/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Proton EDM experiment at BNL with COSY as a partner Institute
![Page 7: Overview of the proton EDM proposal at the 10 -29 e cm level Yannis K. Semertzidis, BNL](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022052510/568146b5550346895db3d76c/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Yannis Semertzidis, BNL
The sensitivity to EDM is optimum when the spin vector is kept aligned to the momentum vector
0a
Momentumvector
Spin vector
dsd E
dt
E
E E
E
![Page 8: Overview of the proton EDM proposal at the 10 -29 e cm level Yannis K. Semertzidis, BNL](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022052510/568146b5550346895db3d76c/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Yannis Semertzidis, BNL
The spin precession relative to momentum in the plane is kept near zero. A vert. spin precession vs. time is an indication of an EDM (d) signal.
0a
dsd E
dt
E
E E
E
![Page 9: Overview of the proton EDM proposal at the 10 -29 e cm level Yannis K. Semertzidis, BNL](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022052510/568146b5550346895db3d76c/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Yannis Semertzidis, BNL
The spin precession relative to momentum in the plane is kept near zero. A vert. spin precession vs. time is an indication of an EDM (d) signal.
0a dsd E
dt
E
EE
E
![Page 10: Overview of the proton EDM proposal at the 10 -29 e cm level Yannis K. Semertzidis, BNL](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022052510/568146b5550346895db3d76c/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Extraction: lowering the vertical focusing
“defining aperture”polarimeter target
RL
RLH
UD
UDV
carries EDM signalincreases slowly with time
carries in-plane (g-2) precession signal
pEDM polarimeter principle: probing the proton spin components as a function of storage time
Micro-Megas TPC detectorand/or MRPC
![Page 11: Overview of the proton EDM proposal at the 10 -29 e cm level Yannis K. Semertzidis, BNL](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022052510/568146b5550346895db3d76c/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
The EDM signal: early to late change• Comparing the (left-right)/(left+right) counts vs.
time we monitor the vertical component of spin
(L-R)/(L+R) vs. Time [s]
M.C. data
![Page 12: Overview of the proton EDM proposal at the 10 -29 e cm level Yannis K. Semertzidis, BNL](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022052510/568146b5550346895db3d76c/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
After the review committee
suggestion (T. Roser) : Take more beam
very early and late
(L-R)/(L+R) vs. Time [s]
M.C. data
![Page 13: Overview of the proton EDM proposal at the 10 -29 e cm level Yannis K. Semertzidis, BNL](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022052510/568146b5550346895db3d76c/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Freezing the horizontal spin precession
2
a
e ma E
m p
• The spin precession is zero at “magic” momentum (0.7 GeV/c for protons, 3.1GeV/c for muons,…)
2, with
2
m gp a
a
• The “magic” momentum concept was first used in the last muon g-2 experiment at CERN and BNL.
![Page 14: Overview of the proton EDM proposal at the 10 -29 e cm level Yannis K. Semertzidis, BNL](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022052510/568146b5550346895db3d76c/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Yannis Semertzidis, BNL
When P=Pmagic the spin follows the momentum
0a
dsd E
dt
E
E E
E
No matter what the E-field value is the spin follows the momentum vector creating an ideal Dirac-like particle (g=2)
1. Eliminates geometrical phase effect2. Equalizes the beta-functions of counter-rotating (CR)
beams3. Closed orbits of the CR beams are the same
![Page 15: Overview of the proton EDM proposal at the 10 -29 e cm level Yannis K. Semertzidis, BNL](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022052510/568146b5550346895db3d76c/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
High intensity charged particle beams can be stored for a long timeStatistics:
• High intensity (41010), highly polarized beams (>80%)
• Keep spin along the momentum, radial E-field (10MV/m) acts on proton EDM
• Long (103s) spin coherence time (SCT) is possible
• High efficiency (0.5%), with large analyzing power (50%)
Systematics:
• Magnetic field shielding + feedback to keep vertical spin <0.3mrad/storage
• Store counter-rotating beams + BPMs to probe <Br>
• Longitudinal impedance: <10KΩ
• Forward/backward bunch polarizations (polarimeter)
Software development:
• Benchmarking at COSY with stored beams
• At least two different approaches, speed, accuracy
E
E E
E
dsd E
dt
![Page 16: Overview of the proton EDM proposal at the 10 -29 e cm level Yannis K. Semertzidis, BNL](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022052510/568146b5550346895db3d76c/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Last review (Dec 2009)• Great Physics, complementary to LHC
• Use all E-field focusing (all-electric ring)
• Critical items:
• 1) SCT (benchmark software with polarized beams at COSY)
• 2) BPMs (test with beams at RHIC)
![Page 17: Overview of the proton EDM proposal at the 10 -29 e cm level Yannis K. Semertzidis, BNL](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022052510/568146b5550346895db3d76c/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Since last review
1. Adopted the E-field focusing option in spring 2010 after studying issues
2. Started a test program at COSY on SCT, software benchmarking
3. Developed a ring lattice with long SCT and large acceptance.
4. Developed significant understanding of the E-field issues for beam dynamics tracking
5. Prepared and installed a BPM for testing at RHIC, while studying systematics
![Page 18: Overview of the proton EDM proposal at the 10 -29 e cm level Yannis K. Semertzidis, BNL](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022052510/568146b5550346895db3d76c/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
The proton EDM ring
Weak focusing to optimize SCT and BPM
B: quadrupoles
![Page 19: Overview of the proton EDM proposal at the 10 -29 e cm level Yannis K. Semertzidis, BNL](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022052510/568146b5550346895db3d76c/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Some ring parameters
![Page 20: Overview of the proton EDM proposal at the 10 -29 e cm level Yannis K. Semertzidis, BNL](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022052510/568146b5550346895db3d76c/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Experimental needsC.R. proton beams
0.7 GeV/c 80% polariz.;
~4×1010
protons/store
<102 m base length
Repetition period: 103s
Beam energy: ~1J
Average beam power: ~1mW
Beam emittance:
95%, norm.Horizontal: 2 mm-mrad
Vertical: 6 mm-mrad
(dp/p)rms~ 2×10-4
• CW & CCW injections: Average emittance parameters: same to ~10%
![Page 21: Overview of the proton EDM proposal at the 10 -29 e cm level Yannis K. Semertzidis, BNL](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022052510/568146b5550346895db3d76c/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Spin Coherence Time• Not all particles have same deviation from
magic momentum, or same horizontal and vertical divergence (second order effects)
• They Cause a spread in the g-2 frequencies:
• Correct by tuning plate shape/straight section length plus fine tuning with sextupoles (current plan) or cooling (mixing) during storage (under evaluation).€
dωa = aϑ x2 + bϑ y
2 + cdP
P
⎛
⎝ ⎜
⎞
⎠ ⎟2
![Page 22: Overview of the proton EDM proposal at the 10 -29 e cm level Yannis K. Semertzidis, BNL](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022052510/568146b5550346895db3d76c/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Software development• Two competing requirements: accuracy, speed
• Total storage ~109 revolutions, ~1.5μs/rev.
• E-field complication: Kinetic energy changes with radial oscillations horizontal focusing
Velocity/c vs. radial motion [m]
![Page 23: Overview of the proton EDM proposal at the 10 -29 e cm level Yannis K. Semertzidis, BNL](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022052510/568146b5550346895db3d76c/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Software development• 4th order R.K. integrator (accurate but slow)
E-field radial dep. Horizontal tune
1/R 1.275
Constant 1.625
R0.2 1.680
Radial motion [m] vs. time [s]
Consistent with analyticalestimations:
Three different E-field dependences:1/RConstantR0.2
![Page 24: Overview of the proton EDM proposal at the 10 -29 e cm level Yannis K. Semertzidis, BNL](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022052510/568146b5550346895db3d76c/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Software development
• 4th order R.K. integrator (accurate but slow, 104 revolutions in ~10 hours CPU)
• Analytic integration with UAL+ ETEAPOT; UAL + SPINK: Fast enough,…
![Page 25: Overview of the proton EDM proposal at the 10 -29 e cm level Yannis K. Semertzidis, BNL](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022052510/568146b5550346895db3d76c/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
BPMs• A radial B-field would cause an EDM-like spin
precession AND would split the vertical position of the counter-rotating beams
• The splitting depends on the vertical tune Qy
€
y = 2βcR0Br0
E rQy2 ~ 2pm
![Page 26: Overview of the proton EDM proposal at the 10 -29 e cm level Yannis K. Semertzidis, BNL](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022052510/568146b5550346895db3d76c/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
BPMs• The splitting depends on the vertical tune Qy
• Modulating Qy would create a frequency dependent separation and a B-field at the same frequency.
€
y = 2βcR0Br0
E rQy2 ~ 2pm
Vertical position vs. time
CW beam
CCW beam
![Page 27: Overview of the proton EDM proposal at the 10 -29 e cm level Yannis K. Semertzidis, BNL](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022052510/568146b5550346895db3d76c/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
BPMs• Developed and installed a resonant BPM in
IP10 of RHIC; resonance ~100MHz
• Statistics adequate for S/N=1 per day
• Estimated systematics large (BPM alignment, bunch parameters,…). Will still take data for diagnostics…
• We took a conservative approach instead: use near-DC effect B-field generated by the beam itself (position modulated only when <Br0>≠0).
![Page 28: Overview of the proton EDM proposal at the 10 -29 e cm level Yannis K. Semertzidis, BNL](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022052510/568146b5550346895db3d76c/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Low Tc SQUIDS as BPMs
• Place them behind a shield (protect from the high frequency beam noise)
• Look at the vertical tune modulation frequency
• Minimize B-field noise from shields (important)
• Direction sensitive
• Commercially available SQUIDS have enough sensitivity. Expect S/N>6, for 10-29ecm
• Plan to develop it and install it in RHIC ($0.6M)
![Page 29: Overview of the proton EDM proposal at the 10 -29 e cm level Yannis K. Semertzidis, BNL](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022052510/568146b5550346895db3d76c/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
So what are the BPM issues?
• B-field noise: addressed by shielding + feedback
• Vibrations: Commercial SQUID system with vibration damping has noise figure plenty good enough
![Page 30: Overview of the proton EDM proposal at the 10 -29 e cm level Yannis K. Semertzidis, BNL](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022052510/568146b5550346895db3d76c/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
What are NOT BPM issues?• Electronics rack temperature stability. NSLS II:
two BPMs sense the absolute position of beam. They require 0.1C stability for 200nm resolution
• EDM ring: One BPM senses the difference between two C.R. beams at the modulation frequency. (Kurt Vettel responsible for NSLS II BPMs just joined the collaboration.)
• Ring temperature stability: just as any other accelerator
![Page 31: Overview of the proton EDM proposal at the 10 -29 e cm level Yannis K. Semertzidis, BNL](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022052510/568146b5550346895db3d76c/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Magnetic shielding(active + passive: 3×108)
4 layers of 0.062" thick Amumetal with 3" spacing between layers: SF 133K:1 OD 35”
Quotation from Amuneal to produce 4 layers ofclam shells (legos) ready to be installed.
![Page 32: Overview of the proton EDM proposal at the 10 -29 e cm level Yannis K. Semertzidis, BNL](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022052510/568146b5550346895db3d76c/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Magnetic shielding options(active + passive: 3×108)
4 layers of 0.062" thick Amumetal with 3" spacing between layers: SF 133K:1 OD 35”
![Page 33: Overview of the proton EDM proposal at the 10 -29 e cm level Yannis K. Semertzidis, BNL](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022052510/568146b5550346895db3d76c/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
In conclusion
BPMs:
• A combination of passive and active magnetic shielding
• Took conservative approach to use near-DC effects eliminating a whole class of systematic errors.
• Using proven techniques (Romalis et al.)
• Risk factor: high (it needs to be proven in accelerator environment)
![Page 34: Overview of the proton EDM proposal at the 10 -29 e cm level Yannis K. Semertzidis, BNL](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022052510/568146b5550346895db3d76c/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
cont’d SCT:
• Lattice: to 1st order SCT very long. Use sextupoles to tune out construction & placements errors
• Tracking studies underway to fine tune the specs
• Risk factor: medium
• SCT at COSY a great success. Mixing w/ cooling eliminates the issue. Studying st. cooling
![Page 35: Overview of the proton EDM proposal at the 10 -29 e cm level Yannis K. Semertzidis, BNL](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022052510/568146b5550346895db3d76c/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
cont’d
Software development:
• Accurate beam and spin dynamics tracking based on 4th order RK integration.
• It’s slow: 10 h CPU for 10 ms tracking
• It confirmed estimation of tunes, radial B-field effect, tune modulation, etc.
• Studying SCT dependence on straight section length, E-field plate shape, etc.
• Fast UAL+SPINK is used for SCT @ COSY
• Plus UAL+ETEAPOT for all-electric; more…
![Page 36: Overview of the proton EDM proposal at the 10 -29 e cm level Yannis K. Semertzidis, BNL](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022052510/568146b5550346895db3d76c/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
cont’d
E-field strength:
• ~10MV/m for 3 cm plate separation. Stainless steel and high pressure water rinsing (HPWR) is below expected E-field limit
• Challenge: QA is critical for large area plates
• Risk factor: low
![Page 37: Overview of the proton EDM proposal at the 10 -29 e cm level Yannis K. Semertzidis, BNL](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022052510/568146b5550346895db3d76c/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
cont’d
Polarimeter:
• Polarimeter data have been analyzed, long paper to be submitted
• Expected systematic error <<1ppm
• Risk factor: low
![Page 38: Overview of the proton EDM proposal at the 10 -29 e cm level Yannis K. Semertzidis, BNL](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022052510/568146b5550346895db3d76c/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
Risk factors
System Risk factor at prev. rev. Current Risk factor
Spin coherence time High Medium (to become low after software studies)
Beam position monitors High High (test in accelerator environment is required)
Polarimeter Low Low
E-field strength Low Low
E-field plates shape Low Low
Software development Medium Low
![Page 39: Overview of the proton EDM proposal at the 10 -29 e cm level Yannis K. Semertzidis, BNL](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022052510/568146b5550346895db3d76c/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
Proton EDM R&D cost
• BPM development & testing over two years: $0.6M
• E-field prototype development & testing: 1.5 years: $0.4M
• SCT tests at COSY: travel support & 1 post doc
• Polarimeter prototype: $0.6M
![Page 40: Overview of the proton EDM proposal at the 10 -29 e cm level Yannis K. Semertzidis, BNL](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022052510/568146b5550346895db3d76c/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
Proton EDM ring candidate locations at BNL
• We considered a couple of places, have made first cost estimate for one.
• We will go ahead and cost estimate one more place (AGS experimental floor)
![Page 41: Overview of the proton EDM proposal at the 10 -29 e cm level Yannis K. Semertzidis, BNL](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022052510/568146b5550346895db3d76c/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
41
AGS Complex
Booster
AGS
g-2 experiment
Linac
TTBC-AD Admin
NSRL
pEDM Feb 2011
100 m
~41-44 m radius
CIRCERL
eRHIC
![Page 42: Overview of the proton EDM proposal at the 10 -29 e cm level Yannis K. Semertzidis, BNL](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022052510/568146b5550346895db3d76c/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
42
AGS Complex
Booster
AGS
g-2 experiment
Linac
TTBC-AD Admin
NSRL
pEDM Feb 2011
100 m
~41-44 m radius
CIRCERL
eRHIC
![Page 43: Overview of the proton EDM proposal at the 10 -29 e cm level Yannis K. Semertzidis, BNL](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022052510/568146b5550346895db3d76c/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
Booster
AGS
![Page 44: Overview of the proton EDM proposal at the 10 -29 e cm level Yannis K. Semertzidis, BNL](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022052510/568146b5550346895db3d76c/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
Proton EDM experiment at BNL cost estimate
• There is still substantial double counting and excessive counting.
• Some items are still missing
• Overhead rate for small project of 39% used. We expect to get the large project rate of 14%.
• Large contingency, 50%-100% was used. Cost estimation will become more realistic with value engineering.
![Page 45: Overview of the proton EDM proposal at the 10 -29 e cm level Yannis K. Semertzidis, BNL](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022052510/568146b5550346895db3d76c/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
Filling-in the blanksSystem Cost Cost including
overhead and contingency
Comments
Electrical $10.5M C-AD
V.C. + plates + Vacuum system
$15M C-AD
Magnetic shielding $5.6M From Amuneal company
SQUID-BPM system
$2.5M pEDM
Polarimeter $0.6M pEDM
Active magn. feedback
$1M
Controls $1.6M C-AD
Control room $0.5M C-AD
Installation $15M C-AD
![Page 46: Overview of the proton EDM proposal at the 10 -29 e cm level Yannis K. Semertzidis, BNL](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022052510/568146b5550346895db3d76c/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
Filling-in the blanksSystem Cost Cost including
overhead and contingency
Comments
Beamline $12M C-AD
Conventional: Ring tunnel, power, water, …
$18.3M C-AD
• 25% less by using the 14% overhead
• Eliminate several doubles
• Add missing items
• The final estimates for the proposal will be ready in ~2 weeks
![Page 47: Overview of the proton EDM proposal at the 10 -29 e cm level Yannis K. Semertzidis, BNL](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022052510/568146b5550346895db3d76c/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
Technically driven pEDM timeline
• Two years R&D
• One year final ring design
• Two years ring/beamline construction
• Two years installation
We’ll also estimate the schedule for another ring location
11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
![Page 48: Overview of the proton EDM proposal at the 10 -29 e cm level Yannis K. Semertzidis, BNL](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022052510/568146b5550346895db3d76c/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
SummaryPhysics is a must doE-field issues understood wellWorking EDM lattice with long SCT and large
enough acceptance (1.3×10-29ecm/year)Critical to demonstrate feasibility of BPM
assumptions including tests at RHICWe need R&D support
We are ready to submit the proposal to DOE
![Page 49: Overview of the proton EDM proposal at the 10 -29 e cm level Yannis K. Semertzidis, BNL](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022052510/568146b5550346895db3d76c/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
Extra slides
![Page 50: Overview of the proton EDM proposal at the 10 -29 e cm level Yannis K. Semertzidis, BNL](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022052510/568146b5550346895db3d76c/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
Proton Statistical Error (230MeV):
p : 103s Polarization Lifetime (Spin Coherence Time)A : 0.6 Left/right asymmetry observed by the polarimeterP : 0.8 Beam polarizationNc : 41010p/cycle Total number of stored particles per cycleTTot: 107s Total running time per yearf : 0.5% Useful event rate fraction (efficiency for EDM)ER : 10.5 MV/m Radial electric field strength (95% azim. cov.)
d 2h
ER PA Nc f pTtot
d 1.610 29ecm/year for uniform counting rate and
d 1.110 29ecm/year for variable counting rate
![Page 51: Overview of the proton EDM proposal at the 10 -29 e cm level Yannis K. Semertzidis, BNL](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022052510/568146b5550346895db3d76c/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
Technically driven pEDM Timeline
07
Spring 2008, Proposal to the BNL PAC Fall 2009 Conceptual Technical Review at BNLFall 2009 Conceptual Technical Review at BNL December 2009, the pEDM experiment is approved • 2010-2013 R&D phase; ring design
• Fall 2012, Finish R&D studies: a) Develop BPMs, 10 nm, 1 Hz BW resolution, <1pm syst.
b) spin/beam dynamics related systematic errors. c) Polarimeter detector development and prepare for testing
d) Finalize E-field strength to use e) Establish Spin Coherence Time, study systematic errors,
optimize lattice
• FY 2013, start ring construction (two years)
08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
![Page 52: Overview of the proton EDM proposal at the 10 -29 e cm level Yannis K. Semertzidis, BNL](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022052510/568146b5550346895db3d76c/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
Physics strength comparison (Marciano)
System Current limit [ecm]
Future goal Neutron equivalent
Neutron <1.6×10-26 ~10-28 10-28
199Hg atom <3×10-29 <10-29 10-25-10-26
129Xe atom <6×10-27 ~10-29-10-31 10-25-10-27
Deuteron nucleus
~10-29 3×10-29- 5×10-31
Proton nucleus
<7×10-25 ~10-29 10-29
![Page 53: Overview of the proton EDM proposal at the 10 -29 e cm level Yannis K. Semertzidis, BNL](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022052510/568146b5550346895db3d76c/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
Is the polarimeter analyzing power good at Pmagic? YES!
Analyzing power can be further optimized
![Page 54: Overview of the proton EDM proposal at the 10 -29 e cm level Yannis K. Semertzidis, BNL](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022052510/568146b5550346895db3d76c/html5/thumbnails/54.jpg)
Main Systematic Error: particles have non-zero magnetic moments!
•For the nEDM experiments a co-magnetometer or SQUIDS are used to monitor the B-field: cancellation level needed for 10-28e-cm is of order 3pG. (See Josh Long’s talk for application of 199Hg co-magnetometer in the nEDM.)
dsB d E
dt
![Page 55: Overview of the proton EDM proposal at the 10 -29 e cm level Yannis K. Semertzidis, BNL](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022052510/568146b5550346895db3d76c/html5/thumbnails/55.jpg)
Experiment StatisticsIncident neutron fluence cold ~ 3x108 n/s: ~ 0.3 Å FWHM
UCN density at beginning of measurement
nUCN ~ 100 cm-3
Polarized 3He density n3 ~ 1012 cm-3, n3/n4 ~ 5x10-11
Cell volume x·y·z = 7.6·10·40 cm3 = 3100 cm3
Holding field B0 ~ 10 mG x
Electric field E0 ~ 50 kV/cm x
Precession frequencies fn ~ 30 Hz, |fn – f3| ~ 3 Hz
Operating temperature Top = 0.45 K
Refrigeration ~80 mW @ 0.3 K
Official sensitivity (300 live days) d = 7.8x10-28 e·cm (90% CL)
![Page 56: Overview of the proton EDM proposal at the 10 -29 e cm level Yannis K. Semertzidis, BNL](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022052510/568146b5550346895db3d76c/html5/thumbnails/56.jpg)
EDMs of different systems Theta_QCD:
Super-Symmetry (SUSY) model predictions:
![Page 57: Overview of the proton EDM proposal at the 10 -29 e cm level Yannis K. Semertzidis, BNL](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022052510/568146b5550346895db3d76c/html5/thumbnails/57.jpg)
3He Co-magnetometer
Data: ILL nEDM experiment with 199Hg co-magnetometer
EDM of 199Hg < 10-28 e-cm (measured); atomic EDM ~ Z2 → 3He EDM << 10-30 e-cm
If nEDM = 10-26 ecm,
10 kV/cm 0.1 Hz shift
B field of 2 10 -15 T.
Co-magnetometer :
Uniformly samples the B Field faster than the relaxation time.
Under gravity, the center of mass of He-3 is higher than UCN by h 0.13 cm, sets B = 30 pGauss (1 nA of leakage current). B/B=10-3.
![Page 58: Overview of the proton EDM proposal at the 10 -29 e cm level Yannis K. Semertzidis, BNL](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022052510/568146b5550346895db3d76c/html5/thumbnails/58.jpg)
Neutron EDM Limits
0.1
1
10
100
1000
10000
100000
1000000
50 60 70 80 90
Year
10^
-25
e-cm
Neutron EDM Vs Year
“…at 3 x 10-26 e cm, it is analogous to the Earth's surface being smooth and symmetric to less than 1 µm” (John Ellis).
Purcell and Ramsey started a long effort
![Page 59: Overview of the proton EDM proposal at the 10 -29 e cm level Yannis K. Semertzidis, BNL](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022052510/568146b5550346895db3d76c/html5/thumbnails/59.jpg)
Polarimeter rates:•Beam intensity with 2×1010 pol. protons/ ~103s and a detection efficiency of 1% 200KHz for ~3000cm2 area, or ~100Hz/cm2 on average but much higher at small radius. Design: ~1KHz/pad.
70 cm
![Page 60: Overview of the proton EDM proposal at the 10 -29 e cm level Yannis K. Semertzidis, BNL](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022052510/568146b5550346895db3d76c/html5/thumbnails/60.jpg)
Yannis Semertzidis, BNL
The Electric Dipole Moment precesses in an Electric field
dsd E
dt
+
-
d The EDM vector d is along the particle spin direction
![Page 61: Overview of the proton EDM proposal at the 10 -29 e cm level Yannis K. Semertzidis, BNL](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022052510/568146b5550346895db3d76c/html5/thumbnails/61.jpg)
Electron EDM experiments• Current limit: 1.6×10-27 (90%), from Tl
(paramagnetic) atom
• Future:
• Paramagnetic atoms: Fr, Cs
• Polar molecules: YbF, PbO, ThO, PbF, HBr, BaF, HgF, ThO, …
• Solids: GGG, …unpaired electron
- +
paramagnetic atom
diamagneticatom
internal electric field 10 ~ 100 GV/cm
paramagnetic molecule (radical)
Fr SrFr Sr
![Page 62: Overview of the proton EDM proposal at the 10 -29 e cm level Yannis K. Semertzidis, BNL](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022052510/568146b5550346895db3d76c/html5/thumbnails/62.jpg)
Yannis Semertzidis, BNL
Neutron EDM Timeline
2000 2010 2020
1E-24
1E-26
1E-28
1E-30
1E-32
ED
M L
imits
[ec
m]
ILL, n
PSI, n
SNS, n
Future
![Page 63: Overview of the proton EDM proposal at the 10 -29 e cm level Yannis K. Semertzidis, BNL](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022052510/568146b5550346895db3d76c/html5/thumbnails/63.jpg)
Yannis Semertzidis, BNL
Hadronic EDM Timeline
2000 2010 2020
1E-24
1E-26
1E-28
1E-30
1E-32
ED
M L
imits
[ec
m]
ILL, n
PSI, n
SNS, n
BNL, p COSY, d
199Hg
129Xe
Future
129Xe, Rn, Ra
![Page 64: Overview of the proton EDM proposal at the 10 -29 e cm level Yannis K. Semertzidis, BNL](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022052510/568146b5550346895db3d76c/html5/thumbnails/64.jpg)
Yannis Semertzidis, BNL
Electron EDM Timeline
2000 2010 2020
1E-24
1E-26
1E-28
1E-30
1E-32
ED
M L
imits
[ec
m]
Tl, e-
Polarmol.
Future
![Page 65: Overview of the proton EDM proposal at the 10 -29 e cm level Yannis K. Semertzidis, BNL](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022052510/568146b5550346895db3d76c/html5/thumbnails/65.jpg)
Electrow
eakB
aryogenises
GU
T S
US
Y
J.M.Pendlebury and E.A. Hinds, NIMA 440 (2000) 471e-cm
Gray: NeutronRed: Electron
n current
n target
Sensitivity to Rule on Several New Models
e current
e targetp, d target
(Adopted from J. Long’s slide)
![Page 66: Overview of the proton EDM proposal at the 10 -29 e cm level Yannis K. Semertzidis, BNL](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022052510/568146b5550346895db3d76c/html5/thumbnails/66.jpg)
Clock-wise (CW) & Counter-clock-wise (CCW) storage
![Page 67: Overview of the proton EDM proposal at the 10 -29 e cm level Yannis K. Semertzidis, BNL](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022052510/568146b5550346895db3d76c/html5/thumbnails/67.jpg)
Vertical plates are placed everywhere around the ring to minimize vertical electric/radial B- fields from image charges
E-field plate module: The (26) FNAL Tevatron ES-separators would do
0.4 m
3 m
Beam position
![Page 68: Overview of the proton EDM proposal at the 10 -29 e cm level Yannis K. Semertzidis, BNL](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022052510/568146b5550346895db3d76c/html5/thumbnails/68.jpg)
Test of Discrete Spacetime Symmetries
Figure: E. N. Fortson, Physics Today 56 6 (2003) 33
EDM: violates P and T
CPT theorem → also CP
nS
H B d ES
Sakharov’s criteria Baryon number violation
→ B; → B B 0 CP violation and C violation
R( → B) > R( → B)Departure from thermal
equilibrium
R( → B) > R(B → )
YB = nB/ ~ 1010
WMAP, PDB (2010)
![Page 69: Overview of the proton EDM proposal at the 10 -29 e cm level Yannis K. Semertzidis, BNL](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022052510/568146b5550346895db3d76c/html5/thumbnails/69.jpg)
In Quantum Mechanics: a non-degenerate system with Spin is defined by the spin vector
0d
+
-
dd
If the particle has an EDM, its vector needs to be aligned with the spin vector, locked to its direction, i.e. it needs to choose either along or opposite but not both (non-degenerate). “CP-Violation Without Strangeness”, Khriplovich/Lamoreaux.
![Page 70: Overview of the proton EDM proposal at the 10 -29 e cm level Yannis K. Semertzidis, BNL](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022052510/568146b5550346895db3d76c/html5/thumbnails/70.jpg)
A Permanent EDM Violates both T & P Symmetries:
+
-
+
-
+
-T
P
![Page 71: Overview of the proton EDM proposal at the 10 -29 e cm level Yannis K. Semertzidis, BNL](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022052510/568146b5550346895db3d76c/html5/thumbnails/71.jpg)
A charged particle between Electric Field plates would be lost right away.
- +E
+
![Page 72: Overview of the proton EDM proposal at the 10 -29 e cm level Yannis K. Semertzidis, BNL](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022052510/568146b5550346895db3d76c/html5/thumbnails/72.jpg)
dsB d E
dt
Spin precession at rest
Compare the Precession Frequencieswith E-field Flipped:
1 2 4dE
+
-
1 1d
EPA N T
Yannis Semertzidis, BNL
Caution is needed applying this equation to obtainthe statistical accuracy…
![Page 73: Overview of the proton EDM proposal at the 10 -29 e cm level Yannis K. Semertzidis, BNL](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022052510/568146b5550346895db3d76c/html5/thumbnails/73.jpg)
Measuring an EDM of Neutral ParticlesMeasuring an EDM of Neutral Particles
H = -(d E + μ B) ● I/I
mI = 1/2
mI = -1/2
ω1 ω2d
EB
12 2ω = B dE
1ω
µ d µ
EB
2ω 2 2= B dE
2ω
2=E
( )1d4
ω -ωd = 10-28 e cmE = 200 kV/cm
= 10-7 rad/s ~1 turn/year
![Page 74: Overview of the proton EDM proposal at the 10 -29 e cm level Yannis K. Semertzidis, BNL](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022052510/568146b5550346895db3d76c/html5/thumbnails/74.jpg)
Yannis Semertzidis, BNL
Important Stages in an EDM Experiment
1. Polarize:state preparation, intensity of beams
2. Interact with an E-field:the higher the better
3. Analyze:high efficiency analyzer
4. Scientific Interpretation of Result! Easier for the simpler systems
![Page 75: Overview of the proton EDM proposal at the 10 -29 e cm level Yannis K. Semertzidis, BNL](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022052510/568146b5550346895db3d76c/html5/thumbnails/75.jpg)
The data
• The drift in frequency is taken out by taking the frequency difference between the cells.
• Runs with micro-sparking are taken out.
![Page 76: Overview of the proton EDM proposal at the 10 -29 e cm level Yannis K. Semertzidis, BNL](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022052510/568146b5550346895db3d76c/html5/thumbnails/76.jpg)
Systematic errors
• The systematic error is ~60% of the statistical error
![Page 77: Overview of the proton EDM proposal at the 10 -29 e cm level Yannis K. Semertzidis, BNL](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022052510/568146b5550346895db3d76c/html5/thumbnails/77.jpg)
The results and best limits
• It now dominates the limits on many parameters• They expect another improvement factor ~3 - 5.
![Page 78: Overview of the proton EDM proposal at the 10 -29 e cm level Yannis K. Semertzidis, BNL](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022052510/568146b5550346895db3d76c/html5/thumbnails/78.jpg)
Storage Ring EDM experiments(or how to create a Dirac-like particle in a storage ring)
![Page 79: Overview of the proton EDM proposal at the 10 -29 e cm level Yannis K. Semertzidis, BNL](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022052510/568146b5550346895db3d76c/html5/thumbnails/79.jpg)
A charged particle between Electric Field plates would be lost right away…
- +E
+
![Page 80: Overview of the proton EDM proposal at the 10 -29 e cm level Yannis K. Semertzidis, BNL](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022052510/568146b5550346895db3d76c/html5/thumbnails/80.jpg)
Yannis Semertzidis, BNL
…but can be kept in a storage ring for a long time
E
E E
E