overview of outcomes, training process and qa procedures for protect iii prepared for the protect...

16
Overview of Outcomes, Training Process and QA Procedures for ProTECT III Prepared for the ProTECT Investigator Meeting November 13, 2012 Angela Caveney, Ph.D. University of Michigan Felicia Goldstein, Ph.D. Emory University

Upload: arthur-willis

Post on 18-Dec-2015

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Overview of Outcomes, Training Process and QA Procedures for ProTECT III Prepared for the ProTECT Investigator Meeting November 13, 2012 Angela Caveney,

Overview of Outcomes, Training Process

and QA Procedures for ProTECT III

Prepared for the ProTECT Investigator Meeting

November 13, 2012Angela Caveney, Ph.D.

University of Michigan

Felicia Goldstein, Ph.D.Emory University

Page 2: Overview of Outcomes, Training Process and QA Procedures for ProTECT III Prepared for the ProTECT Investigator Meeting November 13, 2012 Angela Caveney,

Site List

• Sites reporting to Dr. Goldstein– Arizona– Stanford– UCSF– Emory– Minnesota

• Sites reporting to Dr. Caveney– Kentucky– University of Maryland– Henry Ford– Wayne State

– Oregon– Temple (including Geisinger,

Hershey, Jefferson, Drexel)– Wisconsin– NY Presbyterian Hospital

– Cincinnati– UPENN– Texas (Including Houston and

Austin sites)– Virginia

Page 3: Overview of Outcomes, Training Process and QA Procedures for ProTECT III Prepared for the ProTECT Investigator Meeting November 13, 2012 Angela Caveney,

TBD

• Massachusetts General Hospital

• The Ohio State University

• SUNY Downstate Medical Center

• University of California, Los Angeles

• University of Pittsburgh

Page 4: Overview of Outcomes, Training Process and QA Procedures for ProTECT III Prepared for the ProTECT Investigator Meeting November 13, 2012 Angela Caveney,

Where do I find everything?www.protectiii.com

• Investigator Tools• Toolbox Resources (will be asked for ID and

Password)• Manual of Operations and Procedures

– Appendix 4: CRFs– Appendix 6: Outcomes Manual

Other Useful Links

-Education (GOSE, DRS, NOS-TBI, and GOAT Training Modules)

-FAQ-Neuropsych

Page 5: Overview of Outcomes, Training Process and QA Procedures for ProTECT III Prepared for the ProTECT Investigator Meeting November 13, 2012 Angela Caveney,

What are the 6 month outcomes?

• Typically Administered by Coordinator– ***Glasgow Outcome Scale – Extended

(GOSE)– Neurological Outcome Scale – Traumatic

Brain Injury (NOS-TBI)– Disability Rating Scale (DRS)– Galveston Orientation and Amnesia Test

(GOAT) - Depending

Page 6: Overview of Outcomes, Training Process and QA Procedures for ProTECT III Prepared for the ProTECT Investigator Meeting November 13, 2012 Angela Caveney,

A few comments about initial GOSE, DRS, NOS-TBI and GOAT certification

• Who has to get certified?

– Anyone who will do the test

• Must keep certification active by doing ≥2 every 6 months

– Primary Site Investigators (GOSE only)• Can change yourself to “Waived” in WebDCU following initial certification if you will

not/no longer administer the GOSE

– Primary Site Coordinators (All 4 Certifications)• Can change yourself to “Waived” in WebDCU following initial certification if you will

not/no longer administer the GOSE

• When should I get certified?

– We recommend you wait until about 1-2 months prior to your first outcome visit.

• NIHSS 2 years

Page 7: Overview of Outcomes, Training Process and QA Procedures for ProTECT III Prepared for the ProTECT Investigator Meeting November 13, 2012 Angela Caveney,

A few MORE comments about initial GOSE, DRS and NOS-TBI certification

• Advice?– Don’t take it too early. You will forget what you learned

and certification will expire.

– Take it seriously• Warning: If you fail, you have to talk to us before

you can try again.

– We strongly recommend only maintaining certification for the number of people your enrollment can support. One primary and 1 back up is probably good.

Page 8: Overview of Outcomes, Training Process and QA Procedures for ProTECT III Prepared for the ProTECT Investigator Meeting November 13, 2012 Angela Caveney,

Test List

• Administered by Neuropsychologist/Technician– Galveston Orientation and Amnesia Test (GOAT)– Buschke Selective Reminding Test– Trail Making Test– Grooved Pegboard Test – Digit Span– 6 Month Follow-Up Form – Selective Reminding: 20 + 5 minute delay– Controlled Oral Word Association Test– PHQ-8– Frontal Systems Behavior Scale (FrSBe): Either Coordinator or

NP

Page 9: Overview of Outcomes, Training Process and QA Procedures for ProTECT III Prepared for the ProTECT Investigator Meeting November 13, 2012 Angela Caveney,

Emory

• Study Coordinator: Obtains Consent to be videotaped; performs GOSE/DRS with patient

• NP: Then Administers Tests

At the same time, the SC interviews LAR, has them complete FrSBe

At end of testing, the SC completes remainder of outcomes (NOS-TBI, etc.).

Page 10: Overview of Outcomes, Training Process and QA Procedures for ProTECT III Prepared for the ProTECT Investigator Meeting November 13, 2012 Angela Caveney,

Training and Initial Certification Procedure for all NP Raters

• Let Angi or Felicia know who your NP will be at least 2 months before your first 6 month visit

• For NP outcomes, primary training was at the October 2010 Outcomes Meeting

• New sites’ NPs will need to do the following:• Observe video of meeting• Work with Angi or Felicia on testing procedures

(intensity depends on experience with tests)

Page 11: Overview of Outcomes, Training Process and QA Procedures for ProTECT III Prepared for the ProTECT Investigator Meeting November 13, 2012 Angela Caveney,

Training and Initial Certification Procedure for all NP Raters (2)

• Pass “test out” at site visit or send mock video BEFORE you test your first patient (plan to do this at least 1 month before your first visit to allow for additional practice/submissions)– Dr. Caveney or Goldstein will visit your site as close to

your first testing as possible• Receive Testing Certificate

– Coordinator uploads this to WebDCU (2 places – also GOAT)

Page 12: Overview of Outcomes, Training Process and QA Procedures for ProTECT III Prepared for the ProTECT Investigator Meeting November 13, 2012 Angela Caveney,

Quality Plan (GOSE, DRS and NP)

• All Testing will be digitally recorded (ok if patient refuses)

• Forms from selected visits will be requested for review

– The first 5 visits for each Rater (or more if needed)

– A 10% sampling throughout the trial

• Recordings, forms and data entry will be reviewed centrally

• Feedback will be given for all reviewed tests (even if no errors)

Page 13: Overview of Outcomes, Training Process and QA Procedures for ProTECT III Prepared for the ProTECT Investigator Meeting November 13, 2012 Angela Caveney,

Expiration of Certification

• If you do not test twice in 6 months, your certification will expire• We will use the dates of May 1st and November 1st as static

expiration dates– The first period may be shorter (or longer) for you, depending on

when you certify initially

• Re-training may also be required if you make repeated errors • If you will not test another patient or will not “test out” a trainee, you

can allow your certification to expire

• You do not need to re-certify until you need to do testing or training again (but, please plan ahead)

Page 14: Overview of Outcomes, Training Process and QA Procedures for ProTECT III Prepared for the ProTECT Investigator Meeting November 13, 2012 Angela Caveney,

Avoiding Expiration of Certification

• As May 1 or Nov 1 approach, if you have not done 2 evaluations since the last static expiration date, you can either:– (Includes NP) Test real or “dummy” patients (record)

before expiration date• Total of 2 (i.e., do either 1 or 2 more depending on how many

you have done so far)

OR

– (GOSE/DRS only) Re-do online training

Page 15: Overview of Outcomes, Training Process and QA Procedures for ProTECT III Prepared for the ProTECT Investigator Meeting November 13, 2012 Angela Caveney,

Retraining

• Re-training includes– Observation of videotaped sessions (website)– Additional review of materials– “Test Out” with certified individual (or video submitted to Angi or

Felicia)– Potentially additional site visits in a few cases

• Common reasons to re-visit a site include– NP Examiner turnover (No one on-site to train, inexperienced

new rater)– Past difficulties– Long period of site inactivity