overview of metrics pertinent to human response to uam noise

28
Overview of Metrics pertinent to Human Response to UAM Noise Durand R. Begault PhD [email protected] Advanced Controls & Displays Group Human Systems Integration Research Division NASA Ames Research Center Moffett Field, California _______

Upload: others

Post on 07-May-2022

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Overview of Metrics pertinent to Human Response to UAM Noise

OverviewofMetricspertinenttoHumanResponsetoUAMNoise

[email protected]

AdvancedControls&DisplaysGroupHumanSystemsIntegrationResearchDivision

NASAAmesResearchCenterMoffettField,California

_______

Page 2: Overview of Metrics pertinent to Human Response to UAM Noise

•  Noisedosemetrics;DNL,CTL•  Statisticalmetrics;exemplarcommunitynoiseordinance

•  Spectrum-basedmetrics

•  Metricsbasedoneventfrequency

•  Metricsbasedonpartialloudnessanddetection

OUTLINE

Page 3: Overview of Metrics pertinent to Human Response to UAM Noise

EXEMPLARROTORCRAFTAPPROACHSPECTRUM•SOUNDEVENTISTIME-VARYING•LOUDER&DISTINCTFROMTHEBACKGROUNDNOISE(AMBIENT)

Page 4: Overview of Metrics pertinent to Human Response to UAM Noise

•  Soundexposurelevel(dose-based)

•  AverageandMaximumlevels•  Tone–correctedlevels•  “Numberabove”levels(threshold-based)

•  TimeAudible(audibilityabovebackground)

AEDTACOUSTICPREDICTIONMETRICS

Page 5: Overview of Metrics pertinent to Human Response to UAM Noise

Weightingsappliedtoacousticalmeasurements•TimeWeighting

•  Instantaneouslevels(“peak”)•  Integrationofsoundenergyoverspecific

timeperiod(125ms“fast”;1s“slow”)•FrequencyWeighting

•  A-weighting(loudnessasafunctionoffrequency,atonesoundlevel)

•  Unweighted(“Z”weighting)

•  ”C”weighting,“B”,“D”…….

Page 6: Overview of Metrics pertinent to Human Response to UAM Noise

•  Leq:equivalentcontinuoussoundpressurelevel (averageleveloveraperiodoftime)•  Lmax:maximumlevel

•  Lpk:Peaksoundpressurelevel

•  L90:NinetiethPercentileSoundLevel(L90)(levelexceeded90%ofatimeperiod)

Average,StatisticalandMaximumLevels

Page 7: Overview of Metrics pertinent to Human Response to UAM Noise

SoundExposureLevel(SEL):Normalizationofsoundenergytoaconstanttimeinterval•  Thesoundenergywithinthedurationofasoundevent(e.g.ajet

flyover)isnormalizedbyintegrationtoafixedduration,e.g.,1second.•  Theenergyintegrationstarts&endsretoapeaklevel(e.g.,10dBa

singleaircraftflyoverrethemaximumlevel).•  Thelongerthedurationofasoundevent,thehighertheSEL•  SEL=AverageA-weightedlevel(LeqA)+10*log10(duration)

Page 8: Overview of Metrics pertinent to Human Response to UAM Noise

TwoSoundEvents(aircraftflyovers)AandB•  Ahasahigher

maximumlevelthanB

•  ButAhasalowerSELthanBbecauseitsdurationisshorter

•  SELcalculatesanormalizationoftotalsoundenergytoaconstanttimeinterval

LaMAX=7874

Energyintegrationto1s

A. B.

SEL=82 SEL=87SEL=82

A. B.

Page 9: Overview of Metrics pertinent to Human Response to UAM Noise

MetricsbasedonSOUNDDOSE(SOUNDEXPOSURELEVEL:SEL)•  Usedforhearingconservation(e.g.,OSHA)

–calculatingpermissiblesoundexposuretonoiseoveraworkday(“dosage-HL”relationship).

•  A-weightedfrequencytypicallyapplied

•  UsedforcalculatingtheDay-NightAverageSoundLevel,orDNL,acommunitynoiseexposuremetric.

•  Percentageofpersonshighlyannoyed(%HA)byaircraftsoundcanbecalculatedbyadosage-responserelationship.

Page 10: Overview of Metrics pertinent to Human Response to UAM Noise

•  DNLmetric(Ldn)sumsenergyacrossmultipleSELs•  10dBpenaltyfornighttimehours•  Effectively,a24hournoisedose

7am 10pm 7am

80dBLeq,10s=90dBSELeach 80dB+10dBpenalty 80+10dB

Example:o  TwoVTOLflyoversduringtheday,averagelevel(Leq)80dBo  Oneflyoveratnight=10daytimeflyovers(dueto10dBpenalty)o  Durationofoverflight=10s(90dBSELfordaytimeflights)o  Soundexposuressummedandadjustedfora24hourperiodo  ResultingDNL=51.4

510seconds 10seconds

Page 11: Overview of Metrics pertinent to Human Response to UAM Noise

•  FAAcriteriaforsignificance:atleast1.5dBabove65DNL•  FICON(1992)predicts~12%highlyannoyed@65DNL•  ISO1996.1(2003)predicts~27%highlyannoyed

65

~12%

~27%

CurvefitstohighlySkeweddata

Page 12: Overview of Metrics pertinent to Human Response to UAM Noise

CTL(communitytolerancelevel,Lct):ISO1996-1

•  Lct=DNLlevelatwhich50%ofthepeopleinaparticularcommunityarepredictedtobehighlyannoyed(%HA)bynoiseexposure

•  Calculates%HAandDNLforaspecificcommunityasopposedtohypothetical“average”

•  Thevariationinsensitivitybetweendifferentcommunitiescanbe

wide-ranging

Page 13: Overview of Metrics pertinent to Human Response to UAM Noise

EXEMPLARURBANRESIDENTIALNOISEORDINANCE(SANFRANCISCO)

•Thelevelsandmetricscitedincommunitynoiseordinancescouldaffectexpectationsandsensitivity

Page 14: Overview of Metrics pertinent to Human Response to UAM Noise

EXEMPLARURBANRESIDENTIALNOISEORDINANCE(SANFRANCISCO)

Maximumallowableinteriornoise:45dBAbetween10:00p.m.-7:00a.m.55dBAbetween7:00a.m.to10:00p.m.fromasourceoutsideofadwelling….

Article29ofthePoliceCodedefines“Ambient”asthelowestsoundlevelrepeatingitselfduringaminimumten-minuteperiod…withthenoisesourceatissuesilent,andinthesamelocationasthemeasurementofthenoiselevelofthesourceorsourcesatissue…theL90(thelevelofnoiseexceeded90%ofthetime)isaconservativerepresentationoftheambient….Innocaseshalltheambientlevelbeconsideredtobelessthan35dBAforinteriorresidentialmeasurementsand45dBAinallotherlocations.

Maximumallowableexteriornoise:5dBAabovetheambientatanypointoutsideofthepropertyplane...orthreefeetfromanywallbetweendwellings(apartments,condos,etc.)

Page 15: Overview of Metrics pertinent to Human Response to UAM Noise

SPECTRUMBASEDMETRICSconsiderationoflevelandfrequency

Page 16: Overview of Metrics pertinent to Human Response to UAM Noise

TonalCorrectionmetrics•  Appliedinmanycommunitynoiseordinances•  Accountsfortherelativeincreaseinnoiseloudnesswhenindividual

tonesarepredominantwithinanoverallspectrum•  Examplesofsources:motors,bladepassagefrequency,electrical“buzz”•  Thepresenceoftonescanadd5-8dBtomeasuredsoundsourceasa

penalty(e.g.,LPNT–Tone-correctedPerceivedNoiseLevel-foraircraftcertification).

One-thirdoctavebandspectrumofanoisewithtwosignificanttones(arrows)

Page 17: Overview of Metrics pertinent to Human Response to UAM Noise

Loudness adjusted sound exposure level: LLSEL •  DescribedinannextoANSIS12.9part4•  UseofISO226equalloudnesscontoursinsteadofA-weighting:

basedonlevelandfrequency(butaveragesovertime)•  Appliespenaltiesfortypesofsound(characteristic,impulsiveness)•  Tonalpenalties:5dBexceedanceinadjacent1/3octavebandsfrom

500Hz-10kHz,8dBfor160-400Hz

Page 18: Overview of Metrics pertinent to Human Response to UAM Noise

•  MetricsbasedonNUMBEROFEVENTSaboveathreshold

Page 19: Overview of Metrics pertinent to Human Response to UAM Noise

AsingleDNLvaluecanresultfromdifferentcombinationsofsoundlevelsandeventfrequencyThesethreeexamplesareallequivalentto65DNLTime-energydosagemetricisnotintuitiveforcommunitiesrespondingtonoise

SEL=114dBX1event

SEL=104dBX10events

SEL=94dBX100events

Page 20: Overview of Metrics pertinent to Human Response to UAM Noise

Event Frequency compared to Noise Contours

20

N70(#events>70dBA)Nthreshold(#events

detectableabovebckgdnoise)

Noisecontours(Leq)

Page 21: Overview of Metrics pertinent to Human Response to UAM Noise

•  TALAtimeaboveA-weightedSEL•  TALCtimeaboveC-weightedSEL

•  TAPNLtimeabovePNL-weightedSEL

•  NANLnumberabovenoiselevel•Numberofeventsaboveauditorythreshold

Exampleeventfrequencymetrics

Page 22: Overview of Metrics pertinent to Human Response to UAM Noise

•  MetricsbasedonDETECTIONand

TIME-VARYINGPARTIALLOUDNESS

Page 23: Overview of Metrics pertinent to Human Response to UAM Noise

GiventhesameA-weightedlevel,intermittentsoundislouderandmoredetectable

Loudnessisaffectedbyitsvarianceovertime(intermittency)

a.b.

Time:

Time:

Soun

dlevel

Page 24: Overview of Metrics pertinent to Human Response to UAM Noise

Loudnessisaffectedbythephenomenonofmasking:howonesoundcanaffecttheperceptionofanothersound

Twotonesthatarecloseinfrequencycaninteractsuchthataquietertoneismadeinaudible.Thisistermedthe“maskingthreshold”Thisfigureshowsamaskingtoneat1000Hertzwithasecondtone(blue-redarrow)slightlylowerinfrequencyThesecondtoneinquietisaudibleatthebluelevel(10dB).Withthemaskingtonepresent,Itslevelmustbeattheredlevel(42dB)tobeaudible

Page 25: Overview of Metrics pertinent to Human Response to UAM Noise

Partialloudness:LoudnessofaVTOLinthepresenceofanothersound•Redarrowsindicatefrequenciesthatwouldbeaudible(notmasked)

Page 26: Overview of Metrics pertinent to Human Response to UAM Noise

Partialloudness:LoudnessofaVTOLinthepresenceofanothersound

TotalLoudness

VTOLloudness

Page 27: Overview of Metrics pertinent to Human Response to UAM Noise

Time-varyingpartialloudnessapproach(futureISO532.3,532.4) 1.Characterizebackground

noiseintermsofstandardizedtime-varyingloudnessspectra

2.Determinethetime-varyingpartialloudnessofaVTOLtodetermineitslevelofdetectionforthathour

7am 7:30am 8:00am

Soun

dlevel

Time:

Page 28: Overview of Metrics pertinent to Human Response to UAM Noise

OverviewofMetricspertinenttoHumanResponsetoUAMNoise

[email protected]

AdvancedControls&DisplaysGroupHumanSystemsIntegrationResearchDivision

NASAAmesResearchCenterMoffettField,California

_______